A description of Scottish Plants. An old publication in 2
volumes where the letter s is shown as the letter f and so you need to
keep this in mind as you read this publication.
Volume 1
| Volume 2
Another edition printed in 1821 doesn't
have this letter problem
PREFACE
The general division of Scotland into
Highlands and Lowlands is in itself sufficiently indicative of the
nature of the country, and of its aptness to the purposes of Natural
History. The Lowlands, adjoining the English frontier, present an
extensive and level range of the most fertile corn-fields, interspersed
with moist woods, and occasional tracts of barren heath. In a surface
thus diversified, and also containing a correspondent variety of soil,
the botanist will meet with the greater number of the plants peculiar to
the southern districts of Great Britain; while the mountains and rocks
of the Highlands furnish a considerable number of others, for which
search has in vain been made in any other part of the United Kingdom.
Such a country, though happily now forming an undivided portion of the
empire, is of itself so naturally separate, and was so long regarded
politically so, that there can scarcely be raised a question as to how
far it deserves the distinction of having a volume dedicated expressly
to the elucidation of its vegetable productions. In England, as well as
upon the continent, the advantage of partial Floras has been generally
recognised: they supply the natives of peculiar districts with the means
of examining and ascertaining the plants of their vicinity at a
comparatively small expense; they furnish an important contribution to
vegetable geography; and they record a multitude of facts which would
otherwise escape observation as well as contain in many instances more
laboured and more minute descriptions than can be admitted into works of
more extensive range.
Sibbald, as early as the year 1684, published his Scotia Illustrata,
sive Prodromus Histories Naturalis Scotice, in two small folio volumes,
the second of which was devoted exclusively to plants. This work was
shortly afterwards attacked with severe invectives, which he met with a
Vindicice contra Prodromomastiges. Whether it was owing to the rebuff
which poor Sibbald experienced; or to the unsettled state of the
country, little qualified to encourage scientific pursuits; or to any
other cause; no further attempt appears to have been made to illustrate
the vegetables of Scotland, till the appearance of the Flora Scolica of
Lightfoot, in the latter half of the last century; a publication soon
followed by two lists of plants lately discovered in Scotland by Mr.
Dickson; the one communicated to the Linnean Society, the other printed
in his own 2d fasciculus of Cryptogamous Vegetables. At a subsequent
period, the late indefatigable George Don made many, and in certain
instances very unexpected, additions to the Scotch Flora, the greater
part of which he published through the medium of Smith’s Flora
Britannica, or Sowerby’s English Botany; but some of them are to be
found in his own fasciculi of Dried Plants. In times more immediately
our own, Mr. Hopkirk of Glasgow, the founder of our Botanic Garden, has
made a more important contribution to the Natural History of Scotland,
by the publication of his Flora Glottiana; but still, with the exception
of Lightfoot’s work, none has yet appeared professing to be a complete
Flora of the country north of the Tweed. It will be observed that, in
making this remark, I speak only of a Flora exclusively devoted to
Scotland; it would be an invidious, and it would also be a needless,
task, to provoke a discussion of the merits or demerits of those among
my cotemporaries whose publications embrace the plants contained in the
whole extent of the British Isles. With these I enter into no
competition; nor have I a single observation to offer that may
deteriorate from the merits of Lightfoot. His work contains a great mass
of curious and valuable matter, selected with judgement when it is a
compilation, and admirable where it is original. But it has long been
out of print; and it maybe added, without any diminution of his fame,
that during the last fifty years Botanical science has made such
advances that a new and a different work is now required. To supply,
therefore, this desideratum is the object of the present publication.
The want of a similar work was felt by myself severely during the last
course of my Lectures, and I have reason to believe that it has been
equally complained of in the other Universities of Scotland. Of my own
qualifications for the task it would by no means become me to speak: I,
most assuredly, cannot lay claim to the advantages arising from a long
residence in the country; but, on the other hand, 1 am not altogether a
stranger tc it. Two successive tours, undertaken for the purpose of the
cultivation of this branch of Natural History, the one in company with
Mr. Borrer, the other with Mr. Turner, and both of them extending over
by far the greatest part of the country, have rendered me, in some
measure, acquainted with its vegetable productions. For a much more
extensive and intimate acquaintance with them, I am proud to acknowledge
myself indebted to the communications of my friends, who are residents
in various parts of the kingdom: the information they have supplied me
with is invariably accompanied with their names; but in a peculiar
manner I feel myself bound to acknowledge the exertions made by my
friend R. H. Greville, Esq. who devoted a very large portion of his time
to the study of the minuter Fungi, with a success to which that portion
of the work will bear ample testimony. Still much remains to be done in
that extensive tribe, as well as among the Confervae, nor could the
Botanists of Scotland render a more acceptable service to their Flora
than by searching for new individuals of these families: and I can
assure them that their labours will be rewarded by .numerous interesting
discoveries.
The work is divided into Two Parts: the First comprising all the plants
of Scotland, arranged according to the Linnean system, with the
exception of the last class Cryptogamia. It contains generic and
specific characters, with further descriptions and observations, where
considered necessary, and occasional remarks on the uses of the plants.
The synonyms are curtailed as much as possible, a single reference being
considered sufficient where such can be made to a good figure, or to
some work which shall have described the plant as a native of Scotland.
The Second Part is devoted to the Natural Arrangement and here I may
claim the merit of being the first who has made such an attempt with the
indigenous plants. This section begins with the Crvptogamia, which in
the Linnean system immediately follows the 23d class, or the last
included in the first part of the work, and which may thus be said to
occupy its right place, whichever method may be followed by the student.
In the Crvptogamous or Acotyledonous plants, observations are frequently
added to the synonyms and habitats; but in the other two classes which
correspond with the 23 Linnean classes, treated of in the foregoing part
of the Flora, it has been desirable to exclude all remarks and
particular stations, and refer for these to the First Part. In all this,
my aim has uniformly been to avoid the inconvenience and the expense of
a large book. Could the whole have been comprised in a still smaller
compass, it would have been my wish that it should have been so; but to
have acquired brevity at the expense of clearness would have been no
benefit to those who may use this work, and would have been an obvious
failure in my own object.
Glasgow, 10th April, 1821.
In collecting the characters given of a large proportion of the natural
orders; indeed, of all, with the exception of the Acotyledones, it is
with much pleasure that I acknowledge the able and willing assistance
that has been rendered me by my friend J. Lindley, Esq. That part must
be considered as a joint production, and we alike claim the merit, or
are responsible for the defects, which it may be found to contain. Of
any tiring original, however, as to matter, little can be attributed to
ourselves; the difficulty has been to select with care from materials
which lie scattered in the various productions and memoirs of Linnaeus,
Jussieu, Decandolle, Mirbel, Richard, and lastly, though among the very
first in point of value, those of our learned countryman, Mr. Brown. But
it must be observed, that although the name of some author is in most
instances added to the characters of the orders, we nevertheless have
used our discretion in altering those characters so as to make them suit
our purpose. For by generally omitting such distinctions as only apply
to extra European genera, we flatter ourselves that the subject has
become considerably simplified, without any disadvantage to the student.
In those eases where no name is cited we must be considered as wholly
responsible.
Flora Scotica
By William Jackson Hooker, LL.D. |