HISTORY OP SHETLAND
Is it the Ultima.Thule of
the Ancients—Picts—Norsemen— Harold Harfager—Scandinavian Earls—Ronald
I.—Sigurd I. —Sigurd II.—St Magnus—Ronald II.—Kirkwall Cathedral —Visits
of Earls to Shetland—Swein of Gairsey—Shetland annexed to Crown of
Norway—The St Clairs—Impignoration -of Orkney and Shetland to
Scotland—Lord Robert Stewart— Bothwell—Earl Patrick Stewart—His
Character—His Castles —Misrule, &c.—Complaints—Imprisonment—Execution,
&c. —Earl of Morton—Sir Lawrence Dundas, and Earls of Zetland—County
deprived of Franchise till 1832.
TOURING the early and
middle period of the Roman Empire, the term Ultima Thule appears to have
been applied to some very distant land, situated far to the north of
Gaul, and which they conceived to be the end of the earth. As
geographical knowledge and the Roman eagles together advanced
northwards, the term seems to have been restricted to the most northerly
land or island the Italian conquerors ever visited.
The Emperor Claudius, who
invaded Britain about the year of our Lord 43, if we are to believe
Eutropius, penetrated as far as Orkney. “Quasdam insulas etiam ultra
Britanniam, in oceano positas Romano imperio addidit, quae appellantur
Orcades.” The elder Pliny, in his “ Natural History,” which was written
about the year 75 a.d., mentions the Orkneys and Hebrides, on the
authority of Pytheas, a Greek navigator, who appears, from his correct
knowledge of these islands, to have visited them. He refers more
definitely to Thule, and even takes notice of the length of its day in
summer, and its shortness in winter. “Ultima omnium quae memorantur
Thule, in qua solstitio nullas esse noctes indicavimus, cancri* signum
sole transeunte, nullosque contra per brumam dies.”1
Pliny also mentions, on the same authority, the situation of the islands
of Thule, which he says is north from Britain six days’ sail. “Quod
fieri in insula Thule, Pytheas Massiliensis scripsit, sex dierum
navi-gatione in Septemtrionem a Britannia, distante.” Tacitus, the
biographer of Agricola, claims for him the discovery of Orkney, and says
he also saw Thule.
“Hanc oram novissimi
maris tunc primum Romana classis circumvecta, insulam esse Britanniam
a&fir-mavit, ac simul incognitas ad id tempus insulas quas Orcadas
vocant, invenit, domuitque : (Jespecta est et Thule, quam hactenus nix
et hiems abdebat.” 8 From this passage it is evident that the Romans
were acquainted with and had visited the Orkneys, and that the land to
which they applied the name of Thule was beyond them. What land, then,
can be the Thule of the ancients? Not the Hebrides, because they were
mentioned by Pliny by their proper names, along with the Orkneys; and,
besides, they are situated to the west of the mainland of Scotland, and
their most northerly point is not so far north as Cape Wrath, and
therefore they could not be said to be “ultra Britanniam.” Certainly not
Caithness, or any district in the extreme north of Scotland, since they
are all to the south of Orkney and parts of Britain, and therefore not “
beyond” it. We must exclude Faroe and Iceland from amongst the claimants
of this honour, because they were both too distant to be visited by the
frail galleys of the Romans, unaided as they were either by the compass
or the navigation; and, besides, they by no possibility could have been
seen from Orkney. We must dismiss any part of the Norwegian coast for
the same reasons, and because it is not an island and is not situated
north from Britain, both of which facts Pytheas affirms regarding Thule.
By this process of elimination, therefore, we are shut up to the
conclusion that Shetland alone answers to the descriptions and allusions
to the Ultima Thule contained in the Latin classics. It consists of
islands, which might easily be mistaken when viewed from a great
distance for a single island; it lies in a northerly direction from
Orkney, from some parts of which Foula, the Fair Isle, or the high land
of Fitfulhead, at the south-western extremity of the mainland, can be
seen on a clear day; and a passage of six days would not be a very
lengthened one in the primitive barks of the Romans, who were never
much. distinguished for seamanship. But we have more positive proofs of
Shetland being the Ultima Thule. Several Roman coins have been found in
the country, and in the island of Fetlar the ruins of a fortification
have been found, which Dr Hibbert, a very competent judge, declares to
be those of a Roman camp. It is by no means probable that either the
Piets or the Scandinavians carried their coins thither, and in no part
of the world, as far as we are aware, is there evidence of either of
these races imitating these fortifications, which were of a kind
peculiar to the Romans.
The early inhabitants of
these islands were evidently the Picts, who are now admitted by the most
accomplished archaeologists and ethnologists to have been a Celtic race.
This people spread over Scotland and the Hebrides before the birth of
Christ, and thence must have migrated to Orkney and Shetland. We have no
means of knowing even approximately when the Picts entered Shetland, but
they appear to have remained in undisputed possession until the
beginning of the ninth, century, when the nautical daring, boundless
energy, and desire for foreign enterprise, not to speak of plunder, had
become so much developed in the Norsemen, that the barren shores of
their native Scandinavia could no longer afford scope for their
exploits. At first they appear to have visited Shetland in comparatively
small numbers; and they probably first became acquainted with the
islands by some unfortunate fishing-yawl being driven op. their shores
by a long-continued easterly gale. In A.D. 876, Harold Harfager having
usurped kingly authority over all the other princes of Norway, a large
number of malcontents took refuge in the Terrae Incognitse of Iceland,
Faroe, Shetland, Orkney, and .several districts on the Scotch coasts.
Enraged at this revolt, Harold speedily equipped a fleet to subdue the
rebels, and landing at Haroldswick in Unst, which bears his name to this
day, quickly subdued the Shetland and Orkney Islands, which, along with
the Hebrides, he added to his domains. The two first-mentioned groups of
islands he formed into one earldom, and invested one of the most
powerful of his nobles, Ronald, Count of Merca, with the government.
Ronald made over the earldom to his brother Sigurd, who became the first
of the famous Norse jarls of Orkney and Zetland. Immediately after his
accession to this dignity, Sigurd formed an alliance with Thorstein,
King of Dublin; and, invading the northern provinces of Scotland,
subdued them as far as Morayshire. In his case death speedily followed
victory, but in a very unusual way. Having slain Maelbrigd, a Scottish
chief, Sigurd tied his head to his saddle-bow. The tooth, says the Saga,
which was very prominent, inflicted a wound on his leg, and the wound
inflaming, caused the death of the earl.
In course of time arose
another Sigurd, sumamed the Stout. He, too, was a mighty warrior. His
Caithness dominions having been invaded by Finla, a Scottish maormor, he
gallantly advanced to repel the aggressor with a force one-seventh the
number Of his. Seeing the number opposed to them, the Norsemen hesitated
to face such odds. At length Sigurd overcame their misgivings by
offering to restore to the Boendr (udallers) the allodial lands they had
resigned to Earl Einar, his great-grandfather: the Norsemen charged and
completely routed the sevenfold more numerous Highland host. Following
up this decisive victory, Sigurd extended his sway over the north of
Scotland as far as Morayshire; and afterwards making peace with Malcolm,
King of Scots, received the daughter of that monarch in marriage. It was
through this same Sigurd that Christianity was introduced amongst the
Scandinavian denizens of Orkney and Zetland. Olaf-Trigvisson, King of
Norway, happening to run his long ship into the harbour of OsmondwaU, in
the south of Orkney, while Sigurd lay there, summoned the earl to attend
him on board. In course of this interview, the sovereign laid hold of
the vassal’s little son, and drawing his sword, threatened instantly to
put him to death unless Sigurd would consent to be baptized himself and
to force that rite on all his subjects. The earl yielded. The sincerity
with which he embraced Christianity may be inferred from the
circumstance that Sigurd fell desperately fighting in the pagan ranks,
at the great battle of Clontarf, near Dublin, in 1014.
Partly through his own
military prowess, and partly through the influence of his grandfather
the King of Scotland, Torfin, son of Sigurd, was able to defeat all
rivals and ultimately succeed his father. After a long career of
bloodshed and conquest, in course of which he subdued Scotland to the
shores of the Forth, and became the most powerful of all the earls, he
made a pilgrimage to Rome, and having there obtained absolution,
returned to the far north, where he devoted his energies to furthering
the welfare of his people. He founded the bishopric of Orkney, and died
in 1064, after having held, according to the Saga, the earldom for
seventy winters, and is widow afterwards became the wife of King Malcolm
Canmore.
To dwell more minutely on
the extremely complicated history of the grand old Norse earls would not
be consistent with the object of these pages. In 1115, Earl Magnus was
murdered in Egilshay, Orkney, by Hakon, his kinsman and colleague in the
earldom. After death his many virtues obtained for him a place in the
calendar of saints. His nephew Kali, the son of Kol, •having become a
claimant to his uncle’s share of the earldom, vowed that should he
succeed he would erect and endow a magnificent “ stone minster,” at
Kirkwall, in honour of St Magnus. Having at length succeeded, Kali
Kolson, now Earl Ronald the Second, commenced building the famous
Cathedral of St Magnus, Kirkwall, in 1137. In reward of this pious
undertaking, Ronald, in his turn, after his death, received the honour
of canonisation.
It is interesting to note
that about this period the earls appear to have pretty frequently
visited Shetland. Thus Earls Magnus and Hakon are mentioned in the Saga
as having “slain a famous man Thorbiorn, in Burgarfiord (Burrafirth), in
Hjaltland.” St Magnus, while blameless in life, wise in counsel,
eloquent in debate, and liberal to the poor, was also “victorious in
battle.”
Three lengthened visits
of Earl Ronald to Shetland are recorded—viz., during his first
unsuccessful attempt to take possession of the earldom, when he anchored
Ins ships in Tell Sound; then immediately before *his victorious descent
on the Orkneys, when the treacherous beacon-keeper of Fair Isle stood
him in good stead; and lastly, when he underwent shipwreck at Gulberwick,
en his way to Palestine. On each occasion the noble and accomplished
earl was entertained with much hospitality by the udallers.
Of private vikings the
most daring and powerful was Swein, owner of the little isle of Gairsey,
in Orkney. Having dissipated, with high revelry, the gloom of an
Orcadian winter, in his spacious drinking-hall at Gairsey, he sowed his
fields in spring chiefly with his own hands; and then set out, with
eighty retainers, on a marauding expedition to the Irish Sea. Returning
in time for harvest, he reaped his com; and then sailed southwards with
his long ships, on the “autumn viking,” from which he came not back
until the first month of winter was over. His exploits fill many pages
of the Saga. On one occasion he seized Earl Paul and carried him off to
Athole, never to see Orkney again, and on another captured the city of
Dublin.
Five years before the
close of the eventful twelfth century, Earl Harald Maddadson, having
lent his countenance to an unsuccessful revolt against the Norwegian
king, was punished by having Shetland taken from him and annexed to the
crown of Norway. “It never again,” the Saga says, “formed part of the
domains of the Scandinavian earls.”
Earl John, son of Harald
Maddadson, was slain at Thurso in 1231, leaving no male heir, and thus
the direct line of the Norse earls failed. Their title and estates now
passed through a female line to the noble Scottish family of Angus.
About the year 1330, the Angus line of earls became extinct, in the male
line, in the person of Magnus the Fifth, and another dynasty succeeded.
Malis, Earl of Strathearn, had married the daughter of Magnus; and, in
right of his wife, he became Earl of Orkney and Zetland. From Malis it
again passed through the female line to his grandson, Henry St Clair,
son of William St Clair, Baron of Roslin, on whom it was conferred by
Hacon the Fourth, King of Norway. These Scandinavian earls, jarls, or
sea-kings, who held the earldom of Orkney and Zetland for four centuries
and a half, occupied a high place among the potentates of Northern
Europe. Wise in peace and formidable in war,* they were known and feared
through the wide-extending lands whose coasts were so frequently swept
by their victorious fleets. The position they occupied is not rightly
expressed by the title of “Earl,” for they were sovereigns of the
“countries of Orkney and Zetland” (as the islands were termed before
they were formed into a Scotch county), under the protection of the
kings of Norway. In virtue of their high position they intermarried not
only with the noble families of the neighbouring countries, but also
with the royal families of Scotland and Norway. Of course their warlike
exploits and viking expeditions are not to be viewed in the light of
modem civilisation and Christian enlightenment, but in that of the dark
and barbarous age in which they lived.
As already mentioned, the
earldom in 1379 passed from the Scandinavian dynasty to
“The lofty line of high St
Clair.'
For a century after that
period the
“St Clairs held princely
sway
O’er isle and islet, strait and bay.”
Their sway extended to
Shetland, which is specially mentioned as part of the earldom conferred
on Henry St Clair. The Scandinavian rule terminated in 1468, when Orkney
and Zetland were handed over to Scotland, in pledge for the dowry of
Margaret, Princess of Denmark, on her marriage with King James ILL They
were, and probably are still, redeemable to Denmark on payment of 58,000
florins (50,000 for Orkney and 8000 for Zetland), but have ever since
this impignoration remained politically united to Scotland. Two years
after this important event, Earl William St Clair was induced by his
sovereign to surrender his honourable but onerous position, and sold his
“haill richt”
to the “countries” of
Orkney and Zetland for more manageable domains in the “Kingdom of Fife,”
together with a handsome sum from the royal treasury. The islands were
now annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, never again to be
alienated unless in favour of a lawful son of the king. By a strange
contravention of this wise measure, which was often broken, though as
often re-enacted, these islands appear in the next century to have been
considered the “patrimony” of the unlawful sons of the king; for, in
1530, they were granted to James, Earl of Moray, and afterwards to Lord
Robert Stewart, both natural sons of James Y. The reign of the latter
donatory, whose name is still notorious as an infamous oppressor, was
for a short time interrupted by that of the still more infamous Bothwell,
on whom his unfortunate spouse, Mary Queen of Scots, conferred the
rights of earldom with the title of Duke of Orkney. A memorial of his
short and troubled reign still exists in the form of a tax called “ ox
and sheep money/* originally exacted by him, and which is perpetuated as
one of the numerous taxes with which those islands are burdened. After a
short interval Lord Robert Stewart returned to the scene of his tyranny,
but his misrule Was in two or three years brought to a close by his
death. He was succeeded by his son Patrick Stewart, who obtained the
title of Earl of Orkney and Lord of Zetland (1595), and served himself
heir to all his father’s vices, in a very aggravated form, as well as to
his honours. In Earl Patrick Stewart were united an unusual combination
of evil qualities. He was proud, luxurious, dissipated, and much given
to pompous display; but in him the amiable and easy qualities which
generally characterise the voluptuary were totally awanting, their place
being supplied by implacable cruelty, insatiable avarice, and almost
boundless energy. His father’s palace at Birsay and mansion at Sumburgh
could not satisfy Earl Patrick, but he must needs erect the magnificent
“Earl’s Palace” at Kirkwall, and afterwards the scarcely less stately
Castle of Scalloway. He is described by contemporary writers as living
in princely state, as giving sumptuous feasts, and as never leaving his
palace or castle without a numerous retinue. But how was such
extravagant display to be supported? His lawful revenues were altogether
insufficient for that purpose; therefore taking full advantage of his
power over all the law courts of the islands, he set himself with iron
energy to aggrandise his resources at the expense of the liberty, the
property, and often the very life of his hapless subjects. To describe
the oppressions by Patrick Stewart would fill a large volume. Justice
was perverted, exorbitant fines imposed, large amounts of property
seized from the peasant proprietors, new taxes levied, and old ones
increased, weights and measures altered for his benefit, and the country
overawed by dissolute soldiery, who also guarded the ferries, lest the
complaints of the oppressed should find their way to the royal ear.
Suicide—chiefly by drowning —was very common amongst the small
proprietors of Zetland at this period; and its frequency became all the
more suspicious when we observe that the lands and gear of the deceased
were invariably “escheit” by the rapacious earl. By sea as well as land
was his tyrannical power felt; for ships, of whatever nation,
approaching the shores of Orkney and Zetland, were boarded by his
lordship’s armed vassals, and laid under heavy contributions; and the
people were prohibited, under the most severe penalties, from helping
ships in distress, or rescuing drowning mariners.
Despite the vigilance of
his sentries, and the awe inspired by his widespread power and tyranny,
several complaints against Stewart were presented to Government ; but to
these the earl’s kinsman, King James VI., paid little attention. At
length, in November 1608, the good Bishop Law, with whose rights he had
also tampened, addressed a letter direct to his Majesty on the subject;
and such an appeal could not well be overlooked. Accordingly the very
next month (December 1608), Sterfart was summoned to Edinburgh, and sent
as prisoner to the Castle. In that city he remained till 1612, when he
was removed to Dumbarton Castle, where he could communicate less readily
with Orkney and Zetland. All this time he appears to have been treated
with the utmost leniency that could be extended to a state prisoner; and
the king was believed to be desirous of acquitting him of all charges,
and appointing him keeper of one of the royal palaces, on condition that
Patrick Stewart would renounce all claims to the northern earldom. Even
to such favourable terms no power on earth could induce him to accede;
and early in 1614, in his place of confinement at Dumbarton, was hatched
a bold scheme for reinstating the arch-tyrant in his much-loved
possessions of Orkney and Zetland. Accordingly, in June the same year,
Robert Stewart, natural son of the earl, acting under his father’s
instructions, raised a rebellion in Orkney, which, from a combination of
boldness, tyranny, and effective military tactics, was attended with
surprising success. He took possession of the earl’s palaces of Birsay
and Kirkwall, as well as the castle and cathedral of that town. To quell
this rebellion the Privy Council sent the Earl of Caithness, who
ultimately effected that object more through the treachery of Patrick
Halcro, Robert Stewart’s second in command, than by the force of his own
arms. Young Stewart, who appears to have been worthy of a better father
and a better fate, was taken prisoner, carried to Edinburgh, tried for
high treason, condemned and executed on 1st January 1615. Before death
he expressed penitency and emitted a confession, which clearly
implicated his father. It was this act of treason, and not his many
former crimes and acts of oppression, which brought Earl Patrick Stewart
to the scaffold. After his condemnation it is recorded that “the
ministers finding him so ignorant that he could scarce rehearse the
Lord’s Prayer, entreated the Council to delay his execution some few
days, till he were better informed and received the Lord’s Supper.” This
delay was granted. On Monday, 5th February 1615, at the market-cross of
Edinburgh, the axe of the executioner put an end to the long and dark
career of Patrick Stewart, in presence of a great concourse of the
Scottish people.
The roofless walls of the
Castle of Scalloway still stand as a monument of their execrable
builder, the inscription he placed on them being so remarkably verified
by the fate his vices so well merited. The inscription ran as follows:—
“Patricus Steuardus,
Orcadise et Zetlandi® Comes, I.V.R.S., Cujus fundamen saxum est, Dom.
ilia manebit, labilis e contra, si sit arena perit, a.d. 1600.”
Over the principal
entrance of the Castle of Birsay in Orkney, Lord Robert Stewart’s vanity
caused him to place the following inscription:—
“Dominus Robertas
Steuartus, filius Jacobi Quinti, Rex Scotomm hoc opus instruxit.”
Whether put there as a
mere grammatical blunder, or as a claim to the sovereignty of the realm,
the word “Rex” in the above inscription nearly obtained for him a trial
for high treason, having been heard of by James VI. In no case do we
find a more remarkable example of the hereditary transmission of the
natural as well as the acquired qualities of mind from father to son,
than in the history of the unfortunate family of Stewart. The very same
vices, mistaken opinions, and inability to profit by the fate of their
predecessors, which drove that royal family from the throne, and
ultimately led to its extinction, when carried out by more than one
spurious scion of the same devoted house—perhaps under more favourable
circumstances for their development—in these northern islands, produced
a like result. Both bastard earl and free-born king appeared to think
his “divine right” conferred on him the privilege of governing his
subjects, not for their benefit, but for the gratification of his
inhuman passions and perverted will.
After the death of Earl
Patrick, the earldom was annexed to the Grown to save the inhabitants
from their “former condition of misrule, trouble, and oppression,” and
its rents were farmed by different Scottish gentlemen till 1643, when it
was given to the Earl of Morton by a redeemable mortgage. The exorbitant
and unjust rental extorted by Earl Patrick was admitted into the King’s
Exchequer; no compensation was ever given to the poor udallers for the
manner in which they had been despoiled by the Stewarts; but, on the
contrary, the farmers of the crown lands who came after them carried
out, although in a modified degree, their system of oppression. The
lands of Shetland still pay the old Norse taxes—scatt and wattle; those
imposed by the donatories of the crown lands in the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries—ox-penny, grassums, hawk-hens, land-mails; and, in
addition to them all, the Scottish land tax of cess.
Their possessions in
Orkney and Zetland involved the Morton family in frequent lawsuits. The
earl of that day succeeded in getting his grant declared irredeemable in
1742. After the abolition of hereditary jurisdictions, Lord Morton sold
his estate, in 1766, for £60,000, to Sir Lawrence Dundas,
great-great-grand-father of the present Earl of Zetland, and in that
noble and excellent family it remains to this day.
The county of Orkney,
ever since it became a county, has enjoyed representation in the
Scottish Parliament, and, since the Union, in that of Great Britain. To
Shetland, however, this privilege was very long denied, on the ground
that it had no valued rent. This grievance was much felt, and many a
petition and remonstrance from the Commissioners of Supply, and other
leading gentlemen of that county, was in vain sent up to the
Legislature. Even in connection with the great Reform measure of 1832,
it was for some time doubtful whether Shetland would obtain the
franchise. The Government of Earl Grey was not favourable, and, strange
to say, his eminent Lord Advocate, Francis Jeffrey, somewhat opposed
such an act of justice. At this crisis the claims of Shetland were ably
supported in the House of Commons by the Hon. Thomas Dundas, M.P. for
Richmond (for long afterwards Earl of Zetland), who succeeded in
carrying a clause which gave Shetland the right of returning a member
along with Orkney.
To judge from the keen
election contests which have several times taken place since, this
privilege has been duly appreciated. |