An Act of Parliament was
passed in the year 1563, in which the penalty of death was denounced
against all who should “ take in hand in all time hereafter to use any
manner of witchcraft, sorcery and necromancy.” The same year, four women
were delated as witches by the Superintendent of Fife. Their cases came
before the Assembly, when they were modestly disposed of by a resolution
to the effect that the Privy Council be requested to take order
concerning them. Six years later, a notable sorcerer, named Nic Neville,
was condemned, and burnt to death at St. Andrews; and, on August 19 in
the same year, William Stewart, Lyon King of Arms, was hanged in the
same place “ for divers points of witchcraft and necromancy.” Still in
the same year, according to the Diurnal of Occurrents, “ in my Lord
Regent’s passing to the north, he causit burn certain witches in
Sanctandrois, and in returning he causit burn ane other company of
witches in Dundee.” After this, witchcraft grew apace, and the execution
of witches increased.
In the shire of Renfrew,
prosecutions for witchcraft were somewhat late in beginning. In the
Presbytery of Kirkcaldy, processes against witches were set up as early
as 1632. By the year 1645, the parish of Dunfermline was so completely
overrun by these assumed agents of Satan, that it had to be divided into
districts, and elders and others appointed to keep watch and ward over
them.
In Renfrewshire, however,
there were witches and cases of witchcraft before there were
prosecutions. Of all the parishes in the shire, that of Inverkip seems
to have been the first to obtain anything like notoriety. Early in the
seventeenth century, “ Auld Dunrod,” who sold the barony of Dunrod in
1619 to Archibald Stewart of Blackhall, acquired a great reputation both
in Renfrewshire and in the county of Lanark for the intercourse he was
believed to have with the Evil One and his agents. His fame was
celebrated in more than one ballad. In one of them it is said—
“In Auldkirk the witches
ride thick,
And in Dunrod they dwell,
But the greatest loon amang them a’
Is auld Dunrod himsel’.”
In the extant Records of
the Presbytery of Paisley, the first mention of witchcraft occurs in the
libel laid against Mr. John Hamilton, the minister of Inverkip, on May
17, 1664, wherein he is accused of taking a bribe of fifty merks to
secure against harm a woman who had been apprehended for the crime.
Hamilton was deposed and the woman died in prison. The next reference to
the subject does not occur in the Records till February 23, 1670, when
the Presbytery resolved to consult the Synod as to “what course is
fittingest to be taken with those who go under the name of witches.”
Under date November 2, 1671, the following entry occurs: “Master William
Cameron having given in a certain gross presumption of witchcraft
against Janet Lyon, the presbyterie refers and recommends the business
to the Sheriff or his Depute, and appoints Mr. William to give in the
particulars of the presumption to him.”
By this time Greenock as
well as Inverkip had become notorious for its witches. In March, 1672,
the Presbytery again applied to the Synod for advice, and in the
following May the brethren were directed to report all cases of
presumption of witchcraft in their parishes to the Archbishop, in order
that they might be brought by him before the Privy Council. At the next
meeting of Presbytery, June 19, 1672, it was reported that Mr. William
Cameron had given in “ some presumptions of witchcraft he had against
two particular persons in Grinock to the Bishop.”
No other case is referred
to in the Records until February 23, 1676, when Mr. Leslie, curate at
Inverkip, delated one John Macgregor as a charmer in Greenock. The
charge against Macgregor was that of restoring a young woman, named
Agnes Christwell, suddenly to speech, “ whereof,” it is said, “ there is
a famct clamosa in the country.” When summoned before the Presbytery,
Macgregor denied that he had ever cured Agnes in any manner of way, and
the case was remitted to the Session at Greenock to examine witnesses
and to report. Subsequently, it appears to have been placed in the hands
of Messrs. Leslie and Cameron, the ministers of Inverkip and Greenock.
To these Macgregor admitted that he had hung a bead about the neck of “
Margaret Wilson ” at Inverkip when she was dumb, and that after leaving
him she suddenly obtained the power of speech. He further admitted that
he had taken money for this from the mother of Margaret Wilson. This was
reported to the Presbytery by Mr. Leslie on February 7, 1677. Nothing
more is heard of the case till the fifteenth of August following, when
the Records bear : “ Mr. Cameron is appointed publickly from the pulpit
to inhibit John Macgregor to practice any cures henceforth under the
pain of holding him for a charmer and delating him to the Civill
Magistrat as such. Likewise the people are to be discharged [prohibited]
from seeking after the said John henceforth under pain of Church
censure.”
On the whole, the curates
in the shire appear to have been somewhat slack, as compared with their
successors, in dealing with witchcraft and sorcery. Perhaps they were
more anxious to repress conventicles and to win over the people from
their Presbyterianism than to carry on a crusade against this peculiar
form of superstition. It may be, too, that they were disposed to regard
witches and charmers as charlatans, and preferred that they should be
dealt with by the Civil Magistrate as impostors. At anyrate, their
treatment of Macgregor, the Greenock charmer, seems to argue that they
had more sense than to believe that witchcraft and sorcery were anything
more than delusions. Credit is at least due to them for not sending him
to the fire or the gibbet.
When Presbyterianism once
more became triumphant in the country, witches began to multiply with
amazing rapidity. In the shire of Renfrew nothing is heard of them until
after the appointment of Mr. Thomas Blackwell to the ministry of
Paisley, to which he was inducted, after considerable delay, on August
18, 1694. Mr. Blackwell was regarded as an able man, and had a great
reputation for learning. In the shire of Renfrew he gained a reputation
less creditable. Here he distinguished himself as a great witch finder.
It was during his incumbency of Paisley, and chiefly through his
influence, that Renfrewshire acquired an unenviable notoriety for its
witches.
One of the earliest cases
the Presbytery took in hand, after most of the vacant livings in the
shire had been filled up, was that against a charmer named Dougal at
Inverkip, who, among other things, “taught John Hunter how to make his
neighbour’s corn go back by sowing sour milk among it at Beltane.” For
curing convulsion fits he was reported to have given the following
recipe : “ Take pairings from the nails of the person subject to the
fits, some hairs from his eyebrows and others from the crown of his
head; wrap them up in a clout with a halfpenny, and then deposit the
parcel in a certain place ; when found the fits will at once leave the
sufferer and be transferred to the finder of the parcel.” For the curing
of John Hunter’s beast of the “ sturdy,” so the indictment runs, he had
taught Hunter to cut off a stirk’s head, to boil it, burn the bones to
ashes, and then bury the ashes, which, he said, would prove an
infallible cure to the beast. He also offered “for a 14 1,1 to teach a
man how to get a part of his neighbour’s fishing and his own too. With
this impostor the Presbytery dealt summarily and wisely. He was rebuked
before the congregation of his parish, and forbidden to practise his
arts under pain of being sent to the Sheriff. This was on November 12,
1695.
Three months later, two
cases were reported which appeared to the Presbytery to be of a much
more serious character, and filled them with alarm. On February 5, 1696,
Mr. Brisbane, the minister at Kilmacolm, reported that several
individuals had been accused of witchcraft before his Kirk Session by a
confessant or confessing witch, and that upon the person of one of them
“ an insensible mark,” supposed to be a sure sign of intimacy with the
evil one, had been found. At the same time, Mr. Turner, minister at
Inchinnan, reported that “a woman of bad fame” in his parish had used
threatening language towards her son, and thereafter the house had
fallen upon him and killed him. Messrs. Brisbane and Turner were
thereupon directed to take precognitions of the three “ malifices ” in
their respective parishes, with a view to an application being made to
the Sheriff. When the Presbytery met thirteen days later, Mr. Brisbane
reported that, when examined, several witnesses had declared that a
certain Janet Wodrow’s “ threats had been followed by injurious effects,
and that Janet was now in Greenock, having been arrested there as a
fugitive from the Session.”
At this meeting of the
Presbytery serious developments were expected, and the Sheriff-Depute
had been asked to attend. The cases were laid before him, and the
Presbytery, led by Mr. Blackwell, “ did earnestly desire that he would
take Janet into custody, and apply to the Lords of the Privy Council for
a commission to put her and others suspected in the bounds for trial.”
The Sheriff-Depute, who appears to have been no wiser than the
ministers, promised to commit her, but suggested that the Presbytery
should make a joint application with him for the appointment of a
commission. Accordingly, Mr. Thomas Blackwell and Mr. David Brown, the
minister at Neilston, were despatched to Edinburgh, where they appear to
have had no difficulty in getting a commission appointed. But when the
commissioners’ instructions came to be read, on April 29, they were
found to apply only to the case of Janet Wodrow, who, in the meantime,
had become a confessant and had accused others. The case against Jean
Fulton, the “woman of bad fame” in Inchinnan, had also been enquired
into, and was now fully matured. The instructions of the commissioners,
therefore, required to be enlarged, so as to enable them to deal with
her case and with those of others in Kilmacolm, Inverkip, and Inchinnan,
who were now under suspicion. For this practically new commission,
Messrs. Turner and Brisbane were sent to Edinburgh, and, on May 13, it
was reported to the Presbytery that they had “ obtained, extracted, and
brought west ane ample commission to the Sheriff-Depute and several
gentlemen within the bounds for putting all delated for or suspected of
witchcraft to a tryal.”
The brethren now prepared
themselves to wrestle strenuously with the wicked one and his agents.
But when an attempt was made to secure a quorum of the commissioners to
preside at the trial, a number of them refused to act. This necessitated
another journey to Edinburgh for the purpose of getting fresh
commissioners appointed in their place. At last the appointments were
made and a quorum was prepared to sit. In the meantime, however, things
had gone from bad to worse. To the alarm of the Presbytery, a fresh
outbreak of satanic agency had occurred more terrible than the one they
were preparing to deal with.
At its meeting on
December 30, 1696, Mr. Turner, the minister at Erskine, unfolded before
the Presbytery the dreadful story of the bewitching of Christian Shaw,
daughter of the laird of Bargarran. “ Mr. Turner,” so runs the minute, “
represented the deplorable case of Christian Shaw, daughter of the laird
of Bargarran, in the parish of Erskine, who, since the beginning of
September last, hath been under a sore and unnatural-like distemper,
frequently seized with strange fits, sometimes blind, sometimes deaf and
dumb, the several parts of her body violently extended, and other times
violently contracted, and ordinarily much tormented in various parts of
her body, which is attended with an unaccountable palpitation in those
parts that are pained, and that, these several weeks bypast, she hath
disgorged a considerable quantity of hair, folded up straw, unclean hay,
wild foule feathers, with divers kinds of bones of fowls and others,
together with a number of coal cinders, burning hot candle grease,
gravel stones, etc., all which she puts forth during the forementioned
fits, and in the intervals of these is in perfect health, wherein she
gives ane account of several persons, both men and women, that appear to
her in her fits, tormenting her, all which began upon the back of one
Catherine Campbell her crossing her. And though her father hath called
physicians of the best note to her during her trouble, yet their
application of medicine to her hath proven ineffectual, either to better
or worse, and that they are ready to declare that they look upon the
distemper as toto genere preter-natural, all which is attested by the
ministers who have visited her in her trouble, upon all which Mr. Turner
desired that the Presbytery would do what they judged convenient in such
a juncture.”
The Presbytery were now
more than ever alarmed. They appointed “the exercising of fasting and
prayer to be continued as it is already set up by Mr. Turner in that
family [the Bargarran] every Tuesday.” Two of their number were
appointed to repair to Bargarran and there draw up a narrative of all
the circumstances of the case ; and two others were despatched to
Edinburgh, to lay the whole matter before the Privy Council and to
obtain a commission for the trial of all who were suspected to be the
tormentors of Christian Shaw. On their way to Edinburgh, the two
ministers were
instructed to call upon
Dr. Brisbane, and “ to entreat him to give a declaration of his
sentiments of the foresaid trouble.” There is a brief record of Dr.
Brisbane’s “ sentiments,” but nothing to show what the brethren said to
him. A commission was granted by the Privy Council to Lord Blantyre and
others to take precognitions of the diabolical manifestations. Messrs.
Symson, Turner, and Blackwell were appointed by the Presbytery to wait
upon the Commissioners at their meeting at Renfrew on February 5, and a
day of public fasting and humiliation was appointed to be held
throughout the parish of Erskine, Messrs. Hutcheson and Symson being
directed to assist the minister of the parish in holding the services.
The Commissioners lost no
time in setting to work. Between the 5th and 17th of February they
apprehended James and Thomas Lindsay and Elizabeth Anderson, whom
Christian Shaw had denounced as her tormentors, and these having accused
others, they also were apprehended. On February 18, the Presbytery, who
had already held a meeting on the 17th, met at Renfrew, when they waited
upon the Commissioners, and “ finding that Bargarran was desired by the
Commissioners to go in [to Edinburgh] with their report, which was to be
put into the hands of Sir John Maxwell, to present to the Council, did
think that one of our number should go in company with Bargarran, and
accordingly did appoint Mr. Thomas Blackwell, and failing him, Mr.
Robert Taylor, to go to Edinburgh, and to represent to the said Sir John
Maxwell, and, with his concurrence, to His Majesty’s Advocate and other
Lords of His Majesty’s Privy Council, the lamentable condition of this
part of the country upon account of the great number that are delated by
some that have confessed, and of the many murders and other maleficies
that in all probability are perpetrated by them, and to entreat their
compassion in granting a commission for putting these persons to trial,
and for bringing the same to an effectual and speedy issue, and that
they would order some way for maintaining those of them that have
nothing of their own till the trial be complete, or so long as they
should be detained in prison.” As for the three confessants, the two
Lindsays and Elizabeth Anderson, at the desire of the Commissioners,
they were distributed in the houses of the ministers of the Presbytery,
who were instructed to deal with their consciences as opportunity
offered.
In due time the Judges,
who had been appointed with full powers, arrived, and a certain number
of the Presbyters, who had been appointed by their brethren “ to wait
upon their Lordships,” issued the following manifesto to all within the
bounds of the Presbytery :—
“ The Presbytery,
considering the great rage of Satan in this corner of the land, and
particularly in the continued trouble of Bargarran’s daughter, which is
a great evidence of the Lord’s displeasure, being provoked by the sins
of the land (exprest as the causes of our former public fasts) so to let
Satan loose amongst us. Therefore the Presbytery judge it very necessary
to set apart a day of solemn humiliation and fasting, that we may humble
ourselves under God’s hand, and wrestle with God in prayer, that he may
restrain Satan’s rage, and relieve that poor afflicted damsel and that
family from their present distress, and that the Lord would break in
upon the hearts of these poor obdured that are indicted for witchcraft,
that they may freely confess to the glory of God and the rescuing of
their own souls out of the hands of Satau, and that the Lord would
conduct and clear their way that are to be upon their trial, in order to
the giving of Satan’s kingdom an effectual stroke. Therefore the
Presbytery appoints Thursday come eight days to be religiously and
solemnly observed upon the account foresaid in all the congregations
within their bounds, and the same to be intimate the Sabbath preceding.”
Mr. Blackwell, who, as
might be expected, took a particular interest in this case, intimated
the fast from the pulpit of the Abbey Church in Paisley, according to
the above injunction, and added some words of his own. These were
considered of such importance that they were printed and published, and
have thus been preserved. Evidently Mr. Blackwell was possessed by the
idea that a great and critical struggle was going on between the Church
and the devil. “ My friends,” he said, “ we have been preaching of
Christ to you ; we are now going to speak of the devil to you—the
greatest enemy that our Lord and His kingdom hath in the world. The
thing I am about to intimate to you is this—the members of the
Presbytery having taken into consideration how much Satan doth rage in
these bounds, and, which indeed is lamentable, in our bounds, and in
ours only, they have thought fit to appoint a day of fasting and
humiliation, that so He who is the Lion of the Tribe of Judah may appear
with power against him who is come out in great wrath. 0, that it may be
because his time is short! ” He then went on to “ hint a few things ” as
the causes of the fast, and ended with the startling suggestion—“ Who
knows but in this congregation there be many who have these years hence
been under vows to Satan . . . so it is the ministers’ and the people of
God’s duty and interest not only to pray that God would find out the
guilty among these that are apprehended, but also that God would
discover others that are guilty and who are not apprehended, that the
kingdom of Christ may run and be glorified, and the kingdom of Satan
destroyed.” What effect these words had upon the congregation, is not
told. Doubtless many were startled, if not alarmed and filled with fear
that the hand of the officer might next be laid upon them.
Mr. Hutcheson was
appointed to preach before the Judges, and chose for his text the
ominous words : “ Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.” With these
words ringing in their ears, the Judges proceeded to their wrork. The
trial lasted many days, much strange evidence was given, and the
ministers were always at hand, ready with their suggestions, and equally
ready to converse with the accused. These, when it was found that they
had on them the “ insensible marks,” had no chance of an acquittal. The
advocate for the prosecution declared to the jury that, if they
acquitted the prisoners, “ they would be accessory to all the
blasphemies, apostasies, murders, listures, and seductions whereof these
enemies of heaven and earth should hereafter be guilty.” The jurors had
no intention of running any such risk. They found seven of the
accused—three men and four women—guilty as libelled, who were at once
condemned to the flames.
After this pitiless
sentence was pronounced, the Presbytery appointed two of their number to
preach to the condemned prisoners in the Tolbooth. During the night
before the execution, all the members of the Presbytery were instructed
to spend some time in the prison with the condemned. On the morrow, each
of the persons sentenced was assigned to one or two of the ministers, by
whom they were to be dealt with, and then “waited on to the fire.”
Before the day fixed for the execution, June 9, 1697, arrived, one of
the men died in the prison of Renfrew, probably by his own hand, and
thus deprived the one or two of the ministers who had been allotted to
him by the Presbytery, of the privilege of “ waiting on him to the
fire.” The rest were duly executed on the Gallow Green in Paisley. They
were first hanged, and then burnt. They were the victims of one of the
most horrible superstitions that ever darkened the human mind.
On June 22, 1698, Mr.
Brisbane, who had so successfully dealt with the “diabolical” vagaries
of his parishioner, Janet Wodrow, intimated that he had discovered a
fresh case of the power of Satan in the person of Margaret Laird, who
belonged to bis own parish of Kilmacolm. Then ensued the usual fasts and
prayers, consultations with the Privy Council, letters to the King’s
advocate, delations, and imprisonments, in all of which Mr. Thomas
Blackwell took a prominent part; but, before anything effectual could be
done, Mr. Blackwell was translated to Aberdeen, where he subsequently
became a Professor in the University. His departure wears much the
appearance of being the signal for the withdrawal of the forces of Satan
from within the county. For, strange to say, shortly after he had gone,
the Satanic manifestations against which he had fought so valiantly,
began to cease, and the prosecution of witches and the search for them
came to an end. |