A
THE Auld Brig of Ayr was reopened by the
Right Honourable the Earl of Rosebery, K.G., K.T., on the 29th
of July 1910. At the Brig the Provost of Ayr said, " Ayr has
been given the sobriquet of 'The Auld Toon.' She would have
forfeited her right to such a title had she allowed her Auld
Brig to be demolished. We love the Auld Brig for itself as well
as for its associations. We must protect and preserve those
relics of the long-past ages, as there are sermons in Art as
well as in Nature. Sentiment must not always be swept aside by
utility. It is important that the future may read the records of
the past. We are here to-day to congratulate ourselves on having
successfully negotiated the last fence in connection with the
Auld Brig, this 'ghaist alluring edifice' as Burns has called
it, 'whose wrinkled arches' we can see to-day have been
maintained, partly by preserving, partly by restoring, and
partly by rebuilding. The preserving and restoring have been
done at the expense of a very widely scattered company of loyal
Scotsmen and admirers of our national bard, who look upon this
Brig as the finest monument we have to his memory."
Lord Rosebery briefly replied, "I
congratulate Ayr not merely on a great restoration, but on the
prevention of a great desecration. It was with incredulity and
with horror that the great mass of Burns worshippers throughout
the world heard that there was any idea under any circumstances
of tampering with this immemorial bridge. Fortunately, owing to
the enterprise and energy mainly of Mr Oswald and Mr Morris,
that desecration has been averted, and I think we may hope and
believe that as long as the poet's works live, so long will the
Auld Brig of Ayr stand as a testimony to him for ever."
At the Town Hall, and immediately following
the reopening ceremony at the Brig, the Freedom of the Burgh was
presented to Lord Rosebery and Mr Oswald. In the course of his
speech his Lordship, in commenting upon the intolerance of the
Church of Burns' day, said, "His,"Burns', "great horror was of
anything which savoured of hypocrisy and cant, but what he had
mainly in his mind then was religious hypocrisy and religious
cant. Cant survives, though religious hypocrisy and cant are but
little in fashion now. They do not pay as they did then. But are
we quite sure that in avoiding one kind of cant we are
absolutely free from any other? Are we absolutely certain that
our characters in these days are as free from cant as Burns
wished them to be ? There are a thousand forms of cant which
form the dry rot of our country. It is not my task to-day to
point them out. I might introduce division where 1 only wish to
leave a united Ayr behind me. I do ask you, ladies and
gentlemen, to apply yourselves the touchstone of Burns'
diatribes against cant, and I prophesy for you that you will
find yourselves none the worse for it. Now, Mr Provost, I must
apologise for having detained you so long, but when one is given
the freedom of Ayr one cannot but touch upon Burns, and when one
touches upon Burns one cannot well check oneself. As I have said
before, I am quite aware that you are only giving us this
freedom to-day because we are living admirers of Burns, and
because you cannot give it to the dead man himself. To speak the
honest truth, Burns never seems dead to me. Of all dead men he
is the most living to me, much more living than many men who
to-day are alive. I know no man who has impressed his
individuality and his vitality so strongly on his
fellow-creatures as this man who was born here 150 years ago.
His blood still courses warm and strong through the veins of
Scotland. His spirit is abroad in all our country, and from our
country it has passed over the world; but its home, its original
source, its favourite region is this county of Ayr, and I trust
that in the long days to come, when people remember with shame
and almost with terror there was once a risk of the Old Brig
being demolished, they will also remember in turn their
responsibility, that the connection between Burns and Ayr is
indissoluble and eternal."
On the afternoon of the day of the reopening,
the Town Council caused to be placed on the parapet of the Brig
a bronze tablet with this inscription:— .
THE AULD BRIG OF AYR
ERECTED IN THE 13TH CENTURY
PRESERVATION WORK 1907-10
REOPENED BY LORD ROSEBERY
29TH JULY 1910
JAMES S. HUNTER PROVOST OF THE BURGH OF AYR
The Preservation Committee on the 9th June
1911 placed another bronze tablet by its side, which records—
IN ADMIRATION OF
ROBERT BURNS
AND HIS IMMORTAL POEM
THE BRIGS OF AYR
THIS BRIG WAS DURING 1907-10
RESTORED BY SUBSCRIPTIONS
RECEIVED FROM ALL PARTS
OF THE WORLD
R. A. OSWALD, CHAIRMAN OF THE PRESERVATION
COMMITTEE
It is unfortunate that neither of the tablets
are quite happily phrased, for while the one might readily
convey to future generations that the work of preservation had
been carried out by the Town Council; the other might also, and
without hypercriticism, be held to imply that those who worked
for or gave of their means toward the preservation of the Brig,
were actuated merely by "admiration" of the poet, rather than by
the deeper and more enduring sentiments of reverence and
veneration. The noun implies less than the truth, and the
inscription fails to recognise, or altogether ignores the
devotion and even love which many or those who shared in the
enterprise, bear in their heart for Robert Burns.
APPENDIX B
THIS tradition has survived in at least two
forms. The first, that the lover was a knight, drowned while
crossing the river to the Ayr side ; the second, that the
sisters were enamoured of two monks from one of the Ayr
monasteries, who, in fording the river from the Ayr side to the
Castle of the New Town, met the same untoward fate. As
indicating the pertinacity with which tradition survives, an old
man recently told me he remembered the arched gateway of Newton
Castle, through which, he stated it had long been said, these
monks commonly passed.
Except as very vague and now almost forgotten
traditions, these, as many of the uncertain happenings of the
past, are rarely reliable in detail, although in circumstance
often indisputable. In this case the second story is the more
unlikely, not in practice but in sequence, for while the
earliest known reference to the Brig is in 1236, it does
not follow that the Brig was only then built; and one must not
forget that the first of the two larger monasteries on the Ayr
bank, that of the Dominican or Black Friars, was built but six
years prior to the date named. Whether, then, it was a lover or
lovers who essayed to ford the river, and whether soldier or
priest, is of little moment to-day. The human element is always
as ever the essential factor and real
interest, and the music of the song that remains clear and
dominant centres round the circumstance that a devoted lover was
by the river bereft of life, and in this tradition, or legend or
tale, a tale as old as man and belonging to all ages, the Brig
found its reputed origin and being.
APPENDIX C
THE following postscript from a letter which
I received from Lord Rosebery a few weeks ago, is of interest
psychologically as evidence, if not of fact, then at least of
the power which sincerity and eloquence may exert upon a
sympathetic and perhaps imaginative mind.
"P.S.—Since writing the above, I have
been looking at the book, and a recollection comes across me
that may be of interest to you.
"After my speech at Glasgow for the Brig of
Ayr, I received a letter from a stranger saying that he had been
.present at the meeting with his son, and that while I had been
speaking he had distinctly seen the form of Robert Burns
standing behind me, or walking in behind me as I was speaking,
as I described him in my speech.
"I do not know who the man was, and give the
story for what it is worth, but I think it is interesting."