As a member of the old Realm of Scotland (RoS) group and a subsequent
founding member of the original Scottish Democratic Alliance (SDA), I
have considerable knowledge about how the UK government has been
blatantly mishandling Scotland’s money for many years – probably since
the Treaty of Union. My more or less hands-on experience came as a
result of reading two articles written by the well-respected forensic
accountant Niall Aslen, who analysed the UK government’s annual
publication ‘Government Expense & Revenue in Scotland (GERS)’ beginning
in 2004 and continuing until the Scottish Executive wrested control of
GERS reports from the UK government in 2008.
The UK government knew – and knows – Scotland does support itself
financially. UK government documents released under the Freedom of
Information (FoI) act demonstrate that it has been continuously lying
about Scotland’s financial condition for at least 33 years and probably
much longer.
As an example of the UK government’s lies, Professor Gavin McCrone,
Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, advised the UK government in
1975 of the truth about Scotland’s finances. As Chief Economic Adviser
to the Secretary of State for Scotland, he prepared a report, “The
Economics of Nationalism Re-examined”. His report advised the UK
government that an independent Scotland would have a massive budget
surplus if granted its fair share of North Sea oil. It was promptly
classified "Secret" and suppressed. It came to light only in 2005, when
the UK government was forced by the FoI to release it.
The UK government’s
Government Expenditure & Revenue in
Scotland (GERS) reports
published before 2007 provide other examples of the UK government’s
duplicity. They were finally exposed by forensic accountant Niall
Aslen's analysis of the 2005 GERS report. The analysis was based
entirely on the UK government’s own figures, with one exception for
which UK government figures were not available. Mr Aslen documented the
sources of all the figures.
Mr Aslen's analysis
exposed the UK government’s egregious misallocation – to Scotland’s
serious disadvantage – of revenues (not just oil revenues) and
expenditures. If a private firm cooked its books half as outrageously as
the UK government has done in its GERS reports, its directors would be
in jail.
Mr Aslen's analysis
convincingly demolished the assertions that Scotland was being
subsidised by the rest of the UK. But the British press
(including the Scottish papers) ignored or suppressed it. Luckily,
enough people saw it on the internet before the 2007 election to
discredit Labour’s claims that Scotland was running a £11.2-billion
deficit. Mr Aslen’s analysis showed that Scotland actually had a
£9.6-billion surplus.
The Scottish
Executive published a GERS report covering 2006 and 2007 in June 2008.
As expected, it was very different from the 2005 report published by the
former Labour executive.
This GERS is
certainly improved from its predecessors, but Mr Aslen said it still
contains some very suspicious revenue and expenditure allocations.
The Scottish
Government now publishes GERS reports in cooperation with the UK
Treasury. You can believe the Scottish Government staff go over them
with fine-tooth combs.
http://www.electricscotland.com/independence/TheGreatObfuscation.pdf
and
http://www.electricscotland.com/independence/TheGreatDeception.pdf.
Getting the truth
out to the Scottish people can still be difficult. BBC Scotland is still
highly biased, but the newspapers have increasingly seen the light, and
the internet NewsnetScotland.com is totally pro-independence.
A very recent major
revelation about how the UK government has been mishandling Scotland’s
finances was published in the internet publication ‘Business for
Scotland’ on 5 November 2013. The lead article,’ Revealed: The
ACCOUNTING TRICK that Hides Scotland’s Wealth’, by Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp,
founder and Managing Director of ’Business for Scotland’ is available at
http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/revealed-the-accounting-trick-that-hides-scotlands-wealth/.
Following is a list of the sections:
● Scotland pays its
way
● The debt trick
● If Scotland had to pay only its own way
● Accumulating a massive surplus
● Conclusion
● Data
sources
As of 22 May 2013
‘Business for Scotland’ had more than 500 members from all segments of
Scottish business and was growing rapidly. See
http://www.yesscotland.net/news/membership-business-scotland-tops-500-mark.
An even more recent article, published on 8 November 2013 (as I was
writing this), gives a specific example of how the UK government
plans to withhold EU
cash that was supposed to go to Scottish farmers.
Here are four paragraphs from the article, followed by a link to the
entire article:
A
Scottish MEP [Member of the European Parliament] has said he is "beyond
angry" after learning that the UK Government plans to withhold EU cash
that was supposed to go to Scottish farmers.
SNP [Scottish National Party] MEP Alyn Smith has reacted angrily to news
that the UK government has today (Friday) announced that it will not
pass on hundreds of millions of pounds in EU agriculture payments to
Scotland which only accrue to the UK because of Scotland's unique
agriculture.
The shock decision comes despite a cross party call from Scottish
politicians at Holyrood, including the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem parties
as well as the Scottish government, for the payment to be passed on.
The money, amounting to almost a quarter of a billion euros over the
next seven years, accrues purely because of the poor Common Agriculture
Budget allocation awarded to Scotland's farmers. The decision will see
Scottish farming losing out on €60million a year until 2020, some
€230million in funds to which they are objectively entitled.
http://newsnetscotland.com/index.php/scottish-economy/8300-mep-fury-as-westminster-holds-on-to-scots-farmers-eu-cash.
Going back a little farther in time, in 1999 the UK government illegally
moved the Scotland-England border in the North Sea, thereby stealing not
only 6,000 square miles of Scotland’s sea but also stealing all the
revenues derived from that area since 1999. This move was proposed in
the UK parliament and nodded through the Scottish Parliament by the
treacherous Liberal Democrat/Labour coalition, which refused a debate on
the issue even though expert legal opinion declared the move illegal on
three grounds, but the UK government continues to steal all the revenues
derived from the oil and gas operations in that area. The whole sordid
story can be read at:
http://www.electricscotland.com/Independence/scotland_borders.htm. |