Search just our sites by using our customised search engine

Unique Cottages | Electric Scotland's Classified Directory

Click here to get a Printer Friendly PageSmiley

Scottish Independence and Scotland's Future
Independence Debate
SNP ‘not offering’ full Scottish independence

This article can be read here.
Note that at time of posting this there were 23 pages of comments.

But to put this in context here is one of the replies to it by Dr James Wilkie...

I agree wholeheartedly with the Cuthberts - as anyone who has followed my contributions to these columns over the years will know. The SNP has to be supported as the only feasible vehicle for obtaining constitutional independence, but God forbid that in its present state it should be permitted to run Scotland afterwards.

It hasn't a clue how an independent state of Scotland's size is actually run nowadays, because it has nobody with the requisite know-how and experience. Its pantomime performance over EU membership demonstrates its lack of knowledge of international affairs. That is the primary difference between running a devolved administration (which the SNP has in fact done very well) and governing an independent state.

Independent Scotland will have to live and work within the new global framework of inter-dependence that has developed over the past two decades under the general umbrella of the United Nations. There is no sign that the SNP even understands what that means.

Inter alia, it means that the importance of the European regional institutions has declined relative to the new system of global governance. Within that framework, the 27-member European Union (the other major European organisations have up to 57 members each) is just a sub-regional association of certain states within Europe. It in no way justifies the importance the SNP attaches to it, but the relevant SNP policy is in reality dictated by that front for vested interests calling itself the European Movement (or Euromove, its recent euphemism), no doubt for the purpose of keeping Scotland under foreign control after formal independence.

It also means coping with Scotland's place within a global economy where the levers of power do not lie in London, or even with the US-oriented Bretton Woods institutions, but in newer hands like those of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), which effectively governs the world economy. Constitutional independence is essential for this reason alone, but we must have an adequate pool of indigenous Scottish talent capable of coping with the new global framework within which Scotland will have to work and protect its interests.

The major problem post independence will be the quality of governance, due to the dearth of relevant talent, know-how and experience in the country. The SNP may succeed in its aim, but it has a long way to go before it will be capable of governing an independent Scotland.

This throws up the problem of exactly who will govern Scotland during the crucial period after independence. It cannot be left to the SNP, and there will be no alternative to mustering the best talent, know-how and experience available in Scotland and elsewhere.

With a worldwide diaspora Scotland should be able to fill the inevitable gap until an indigenous body of ability and experience can be built up over the years, with a correspondingly beneficial spin-off onto national intellectual and cultural life.

Return to our Scottish Independence and Scotland's Future Index Page


This comment system requires you to be logged in through either a Disqus account or an account you already have with Google, Twitter, Facebook or Yahoo. In the event you don't have an account with any of these companies then you can create an account with Disqus. All comments are moderated so they won't display until the moderator has approved your comment.

comments powered by Disqus