| |
Social History
of the Highlands
Courage
|
Accustomed, as the Highlanders were, to
interminable feuds arising out of the pretensions of rival clans, the native courage which
they had inherited from their Celtic progenitors was preserved unimpaired. Instances of
cowardice were, therefore, of rare occurrence, and whoever exhibited symptoms of fear
before a foe, was considered infamous and put under the ban of his party. The following
anecdote, as related by Mrs. Grant, shows, strongly, the detestation which the Highlanders
entertained towards those who had disgraced themselves and their clan by an act of
poltroonery: "There was a clan, I must not say what clan it is, who had been for ages
governed by a series of chiefs, singularly estimable, and highly beloved, and who, in one
instance, provoked their leader to the extreme of indignation. I should observe, that the
transgression was partial, the culprits being the inhabitants of one single parish. These,
in a hasty skirmish with a neighbouring clan, thinking discretion the better part of
valour, sought safety in retreat. A cruel chief would have inflicted the worst of
punishments - banishment from the bounds of his clan - which, indeed, fell little short of
the curse of Kehama. This good laird, however, set bounds to his wrath, yet made their
punishment severe and exemplary. He appeared himself with all the population of the three
adjacent parishes, at the parish church of the offenders, where they all were by order
convened. After divine service, they were marched three times round the church, in
presence of their offended leader and his assembled clan. Each individual, on coming out
of the church door, was obliged to draw out his tongue with his fingers, and then cry
audibly, 'Shud bleider heich,' (i.e.) 'This is the poltroon,' and to repeat it at every
corner of the church. After this procession of ignominy, no other punishment was
inflicted, except that of being left alone to guard the district when the rest were called
out to battle.....It is credibly asserted, that no enemy has seen the back of any of that
name (Grant) ever since. And it is certain, that, to this day, it is not safe for any
person of another name to mention the circumstance in presence of one of the affronted
clan." |
Next Part | Previous Part
| Index
|