Emigraton has no
permanent effect on population, Legal
restrictions; useless and dangerous:: discontents in
the Highlands:: emigration useful to the public peace.
The
concise view that has been taken of the
different resources which have been proposed for preserving the local
population of the Highlands, may be sufficient to show, that not one of
them is applicable to the circurnstances of those who are most inclined to
emigration. It must also be observed that these resources are still to be
found only in the regions of theory; and to their practical application
there are irnpediments which cannot be removed without much patience and
exertion. The country is by no means arrived, and will require a
considerable time before it can arrive, at such a state, that every man
who is industriously disposed, may have opportunities of employment
adapted to his situation.
Independently of any question as to
constitutional propriety, nothing seems more obvious, than the necessity
of bringing resources of this kind to full maturity within the country,
before any legal interference is hazarded for preventing the people from
seeking them elsewhere. To act upon contrary principles would be
productive of the utmost misery, and of a real, instead of an apparent:
depopulation. Let us suppose an extreme case; that, while the change of
the agricultural system is
allowed to go on, and no adequate means of support are provided for the
superabundant population, invincible obstacles should be contrived to
restrain the people from removing to a different situation. The infallible
consequence must be, that the lower classes would be reduced
to the utmost distress: the difficulty of
procuring either land or employment would amount almost to an
impossibility; and even if the people should escape absolute famine, few
would be inclined in such circumstances to undertake the burthen of
rearing a family or would venture on
marriage. The misery of the people would thus in time produce the effect
which emigration is now working, and reduce their numbers to a due’
proportion with the employment
that can be given them. On
the other hand, if a number of people, who are under no absolute
necessity, should emigrate, those who remain behind will find it so rnuch
easier to procure employrnent and subsistence, that marriages will more
readily take place, and the natural increase of population will proceed
with more rapidity, till every blank is filled
up.
On this subject it will be
sufficient to refer to the valuable work of. Mr. Malthus on the Principle
of Population, in which these arguments are traced to such
uncontrovertible general principles, and with such force of illustration,
as to put scepticism at defiance. I may be allowed, however, to state one
or two facts, which, while they add to the mass of concurring proofs which
Mr. Maithus has quoted, may serve to show how immediately his principles
are applicable to the particular case of the Highlands.
By the returns made to Dr.
:Webster, in the year 1755, the seven parishes of the Isle of Sky
contained 11,252 inhabitants. By those to Sir John Sinclair, between 1791
and 1794, 14,470. Some time after Dr, Webster’s enumeration, the
emigrations commenced, and, since the year 1770, have been. frequent and
of great amount. A gentleman of ability and observation, whose; employment
in the island gave him the best opportunities of information, estimates
the total number who emigrated, between 1772 and 1791, at 4000. The number
who, during the same period, went to the Low Country of Scotland, going in
amore gradual manner, and exciting less notice, could not be so well
ascertained; but from concurring circumstances he considers 8000 as the
least at which they can possibly be reckoned.
Notwithstanding this drain,
it appears that the natural tendency of population to multiply has more
than filled up the blank; and if, to the numbers which have left the
island, we add the natural increase which has probably taken place among
them also, in their new situation, we cannot doubt that there are now
living a number of people
descended from those who inhabited the island at the period of Dr
Webster’s enumeration, at least double of its actual population. Now, let
it be supposed, for the sake of argument, that the whole of these could
again be collected within the island: will the wildest declaimer against
emigration pretend, to say, that, it could afford. support or employment
to them all? When its actual. numbers are an oppressive burthen, what
would be the case if such an addition were made? Can it possibly be
believed, that, if the emigrations had not taken place, the same natural
increase would have gone on? And does not this instance demonstrate, that
to restrain emigration, would only be to restrain the principle of
increasing population?
Another instance of a similar fact is quoted by Mr.
Irvine. It was communicated, he says, by a gentleman of unquestionable
veracity, who relates, from his personal knowle4ge, that in 1790, a place
on the west coast contained 1900 inhabitants, of whom 500 emigrated the
same year to America. In 1801, a census was taken, and the same spot
contained 1967, though it had furnished 87 men for the army and navy, and
not a single stranger settled in it.’
There is, perhaps, no part of the
Highlands. where the people have so strong a spirit of emigration, and
where the gentry are so much in dread of its effects, as in that part of
the Hebrides called the Long Island, particularly in North and South Uist,
and Barra. From these islands there have been very considerable
emigrations at different times, some of which, though by no means all, are
enumerated in the statistical accounts. Of the total number of the people
who have left these islands, I cannot speak with precision; but from
various circumstances they appear to have been as great in proportion to
the whole popuIation, as in other parts of the Highlands. Nevertheless
these parishes, which, in 1755, contained 5268 people, were found to have
8808 at the date of Sir John Sinclair’s statistical survey. The
particulars that may be collected from that publication, as to the crowded
state of population, and the poverty of the people in consequence of it,
make it apparent that the multiplication of the inhabitants has gone to an
inconvenient and excessive degree.
These facts might be corroborated by
many other examples; but these are perhaps sufficient to leave no doubt of
the principle, that emigration does not imply the necessity of a permanent
diminution of population, and is not even inconsistent with an increase,
wherever there are adequate resources for its employment and support.
This principle, important in itself,
leads to a conclusion of still more importance— the emigrations from the
Highlands, without ultimately affecting the numbers of the people,
operate a very desirable change. in their character and
composition.
A few of the small tenants, who,
with some amount of capital, combine industry and good management,
gradually extend their possessions, and grow up into farrners on a more
respectable scale: the rest of this class, and the greater
proportion, emigrate to America: the cotters, or as many of them as can
remain in the country, fall into the station of labourers on these
extended farms, and other subordinate employments; multiplying till every
blank is filled up. The peasantry in this way takes the form most fit for
a Commercial state of society; and in order to wind up and complete the
abolition of feudal manners, such a change in the people of the Highlands
is absolutely necessary. Their established character, founded upon the
habits which the former state of the country required, do not accord with
the condition of the lower classes in an industrious community.
The obstacles to the requisite
change are chiefly formed among the more opulent of the cornmonality among
them is the greatest difficulty of exciting a spirit of industry, or
directing it to any new pursuit, and, nearly in proportion to the amount
of their property, are their dispositions intractable. The tenants are no
doubt those who come nearest to the desciption of men whom an antient
chieftain would value. The cotters may not retain so much of the generous
spirit of their warlike ancestors; but they will be more easily moulded
into the character adapted to the present circumstances of the country,
into industrious and contented labourers.
While the small tenants emigrate,
the cotters, if any productive employment is introduced as a resource for
them, will feel their circumstances ameliorated in proportion to the
growth of their industrious habits. Having little in their previous
situation to excite feelings of regret, and animated by the prospect of
bettering their condition, they will proceed with vigour and cheerfulness
in the career that is opened to them.
If by any coercive means the small
tenants are obliged to remain and to follow the same pursuits, it must be
with a very different spirit. They will not forget that they were once in
a higher station, nor will they allow their children to forget that they
were once on a level with the men who insult them by their superiority.
Instead of the animating prospect of rising in the world, they will have
the idea of degradation constantly rankling in their minds, to damp their
exertions and to sour their temper.
It is not to be overlooked that
among the peasantry of the Highlands, and particularly among the tenants,
a spirit of discontent and irritation is widely diffused; nor will this
appear extraordinary to any one who has paid a minute attention to the
circumstances attending the breaking up of the feudal system. The progress
of the rise of rents, and the frequent removal of the antient possessors
of the land, have nearly annihilated in the people all that enthusiastic
attachment to their chiefs, which was formerly prevalent, and have
substituted feelings of disgust and irritation proportionaliy, violent. It
is not the mere burthen of an additional rent that seems hard to them: the
cordiality and condescension which they formerly experienced from their
superiors are now no more: they have not yet learnt to brook their
neglect: they are not yet accustomed to the habits of a commercial
society, to the coldness, which must be expected by those whose
intercourse with their superiors is confined to the daily exchange of
labour for its stipulated reward. They remember not only the very opposite
behaviour of their former chiefs; they recollect also the services their
ancestors performed for them: they recollect that, but for these, the
property could not have been preserved: they well know of how little avail
was a piece of parchment and a lump of wax, under the old system of the
Highlands: they reproach their landlord with ingratitude, and remind him
that, but for their fathers, he would now have no estate. The permanent
possession which they had always retained of their paternal farms, they
consider only as their just right, from the share they had borne in the
general defence, and can see no difference between. the title of the chief
and their own.
Men in whose minds these impressions
have taken root, are surely. not a desirable. population; and. if they do
not remove, the irritation that prevails among them may be transmitted
from generation to generation and disturb the peace of the country long
after the causes from which it has arisen may be considered as worn out.
The example of Ireland may, perhaps, be quoted, to prove to what distant
periods the effect of an antiquated ground of discontent may be prolonged
by a train of consequences reacting upon each other. Amidst all the
variety of opinion that are entertained as to the immediate effect
of more recent measures, no one who is acquainted with that kingdom will
deny, that the mutual animosity of its religious parties is (at least in a
great degree) the legitimate offspring and consequence of the horrible
feuds that raged in the 17th century and preceding ages; nor can it be
doubted, that if after the forfeitures under Cromwell and King William,
all who felt themselves immediately aggrieved by these acts of power, had
found the means (as much as they doubtless had the inclination) to seek a
distant asylum, the internal state of that country at this day would be
much more satisfactory.
To state any comparison with a part
of the empire so dreadfully convulsed, may appear an exaggerated view; but
incidents have occurred in the Highlands, sufficient to prove that this
apprehension is not altogether visionary. For the truth of this, I may
appeal to any gentleman who was in the shire of Ross or Cromarty in July
and. August, 1792. I happened to be there myself at that moment when the
irritation alluded to broke out into actual violence. Sheep-farming was
then in the first stage of its introduction into that district, but the
people had heard of its consequences in others. Roused by the circumstance
of a particular estate being turned into sheep-walks, the. tenantry of all
the adjoining country took part with those who were ejected, and rose in
arms. These poor and ignorant men, without leaders, and without any
intelligible plan, actuated by indignation merely against their immediate.
superiors, and as if they did not understand that they were committing an
offence against the general government of the kingdom, proceeded to vent
their rage in driving away the sheep that; had been brought to stock the
grazings. They had for many days the entire command of the country;
and it was not from want of opportunity that few acts of pillage or
personal violence were committed. In a letter to the officers of
government at Edinburgh, a general rneeting of gentlemen expressed
themselves nearly in these words: ‘We are at the feet of the mob, and if
thet should proceed to burn our houses, we are incapable of any
resistance.'
It is satisfactory to reflect that
this irritation of the common people has been hitherto against their
immediate superiors only, and that the Highlanders have never given reason
to impeach that character of loyalty
towards their
sovereign which their ancestors maintained. It cannot surely be reckoned
of no importance to preserve these sentiments unimpaired; and this object
ought not to be overlooked in the consideration of any legislative
measure which may appear to these people the result of undue partiality
for the interest of their superiors, or which can with any plausibility be
deemed an infringment of the principles of equal justice towards :the
lower orders.
This, however, is not the only view
on which a direct attempt to restrain emigration may have pernicious
consequences. There is scarcely any part of the Highlands that has not in
its turn been in a state of irritation as great as that of Ross-shire in
1792; can any comment be necessary to show what would have been the
dreadful state of things, if this had come to a height at the same moment
over all the country? It has been the good fortune of Scotland, that, from
the gradual manner in which the new system of management has advanced,
this has happened in different districts, at different times; and by means
of the emigrations, the discontented people of one have been removed,
before the same causes of discontent had produced their full effect in
another. What must we think, then, of the policy which would impede this
salutary drain, and would prevent a population infected with deep and
permanent seeds of every angry passion, from removing and making way for
one of a more desirable character |