Search just our sites by using our customised search engine

Unique Cottages | Electric Scotland's Classified Directory

Click here to get a Printer Friendly PageSmiley

Significant Scots
Whyte-Melville, George John

IT is a great misfortune to English literature that the pencil of John Leech never lent its aid to the pen of Whyte-Melville, an alliance of author and artist as natural as the - memorable one between Boz and Phiz. They were contemporary: each excelled in the delineation of the chase: each delighted in portraying the most charming phases of young womanhood and the graces and foibles of young men. It is doubtful whether John Jorrocks and the rest of Surtees' inimitable gallery would ever have become the very household gods of the hunting-box had Leech not been enlisted to enliven the chronicle by his art. But Whyte-Melville was a careless author ; he cared little, that is, for the form in which his books were published. Writing for his own amusement and that of his friends, he devoted all the proceeds of his labour to philanthropic and charitable ends, especially to the establishment and maintenance of reading- rooms and other means of recreation for grooms and stable-boys. He seems to have had none of that parental conceit in his work that renders a writer fastidious about paper, type, and other bibliographic millinery, reflecting in that respect the indifference he always showed in his own costume; for although he was extremely critical about the dress of others, and was an acknowledged arbiter of how a man should be turned out for hunting, lie himself never wore in the field anything more elaborate than a black coat and hunting boots.

It is not too late to attempt an edition of Whyte-Melville's writings more worthy of their quality than those which have gone before. These novels may not rank high as "human documents"—which seems to be the term applied to stories of the failure of energy and commonsense to steer a character through ordinary temptation and the results of puzzle-headedness; they may be deficient in variety of characters represented, the same types recurring under different names in successive combinations ; the problems presented for solution may fade into insignificance before some of those with which certain more recent writers entertain their readers. But as long as chivalry in man and tenderness in maid have any hold upon English readers— as long as people take delight in descriptions of honest love-making, adventure and field sports, or find amusement in gentle satire of well-to-do folk and kindly raillery at the foibles of all classes —as long as the public is not too critical to enjoy pictures of the general prevalence of good over evil in the world as we have it-SO long shall Whyte-Melville find high favour with wholesome minds.

The son of a Scottish laird—Mr. John Whyte-Melville, of Mount Melville in Fife. J. G. Whyte-Melville was born in 1821, and went, in process of time, to Eton, after the manner of many of his kind. The reputation of Eton for scholarship never, perhaps, exceedingly high, was probably at its lowest in the "thirties"; yet, as has happened to other boys who have passed in and out of her gates without distinction, young George acquired in that school a loving reverence for Latin writers which endured throughout his life and left its stamp on all his writings.

In 1839 he obtained a commission in the army, and, having exchanged into the Coldstream Guards in 1846, retired in 1849. Five years later, on war being declared with Russia, he volunteered for active service, and was employed throughout the campaign as a major of Turkish Irregular Cavalry. Returning to England after peace was declared, Whyte-Melville indulged his passion for country life, and generally spent the winter in hunting quarters in Leicestershire and Northamptonshire, latterly in Gloucestershire; while in summer he was most often to be found on the links of his native St. Andrews in clays before golf had fired, as an apocalypse, the fancies of men besouth the Tweed. Himself a bold and good horseman, very modest withal, he was always more disposed to turn an appreciative eye on the performances of others than to invite attention to his own.

Many a story is told even now of his quiet humour and old-lash iotied, never-failing courtesy. One day, as he stood at the edge of the pavement, waiting to cross an excessively muddy street, a lady's carriage drew up smartly in front of a shop before which he was standing, splashing him from head to foot with filthy mire, an assault of a kind calculated to upset the equanimity of the mildest of men.

"Oh, Major Melville," exclaimed the lady, a Friend of his, ''I am so sorry."

"It doesn't matter a bit," said he; ''I always say you drive the best-actioned horses in London."

Readers of Whyte-Melville's novels cannot fail to be struck by a constantly recurring note of melancholy which runs through them all, especially in reference to women. Therein may be traced the effect of his own lifelong disappointment. It behoves one to deal reverently with the domestic life, even of the departed, but it was matter of common knowledge to all his acquaintance that his marriage did not turn out happily. Probably there were faults on both sides—in what quarrel can it be said that there are not? At all events one seems to recognise some consciousness of this and unavailing regret in such passages as the following, spoken by "Uncle John" to Algernon Lealey, who was about to marry

"There is but one hit of advice I can give. Don't start with too exalted an idea of your goddess. She must come down from her pedestal sometimes. When she does not agree with you. don't be provoked with her because she is your wife, but listen to her courteously, though she is talking nonsense, as you would to any other lady. ...Above all, never attempt to reason with her as you would with a man." -

Passages of similar significance may be found ill the novels, but perhaps nowhere do these feelings receive such clear expression as in the remarkable budget of essays entitled Bones and I:—

"If Clebs (in search of a wife) expects to find a perfection really exist which he thinks he has discovered while dazzled by the glamour surrounding a man in love, he deserves to he disappointed, and he generally is. . . . What is it we expect to find? In this matter of marriage, more than in any other, our anticipations are so exorbitant that we cannot be surprised if our come-down is dis- heartening in proportion.

Where is the maiden of mortal strain,
That may match ith the Baron of Triermain?
She must be lovely, constant and kind,
Holy and pure, and humble of ifl]fld,' etc.

"Yes, she must be all this, and possess a thousand other good qualities, many more than are enumerated by lago, so as never to descend for a moment from the pedestal on which her baron has set her up. Is this indulgent—is it even reasonable? Can he expect any human creature to be always dancing on the tight rope? . Men are very hard in the way of exaction on those they love. All 'take' seems their motto, and as little 'give' as possible. If they would but remember the golden rule, and expect no more than should be expected from themselves, it might be a better world for everybody."

And then, as if recollecting that the shortcoming had not been all on his own side, Whyte- Melville ends the colloquy with Bones, by making his fleshless companion observe-

"I never knew but one woman who could understand reason, and she wouldn't listen to it!

For an unprofessional writer, Whyte-Melville's literary diligence was remarkable. Few men, who, like him, were independent of and indifferent to the pecuniary fruits of their labour, would have cared to undergo the drudgery necessary to producing twenty-eight separate works in twenty-six years. But Whyte-Melville was a born storyteller, and from the first he never lacked an audience. Man of the world in the best sense, he gave the impression of one who never lost consciousness of something beyond the world. His writings abound in passages of true philosophy, not less profound because expressed in terms suggestive of levity. Perhaps the chapter on "Gourds" in Bones and I is as characteristic of his style as any that could be chosen. He excelled as a delineator of the phases of fashionable life, and enjoyed an advantage over many novelists who attempt to deal with it, in that his perfect and daily familiarity with its ways and peculiarities steered him clear of those blunders which so often raise a smile at the expense of observers less perfectly qualified than Whyte-Melville.

But he was at his best—and therein almost unrivalled—in describing the incidents of the hunting-field. " Nimrod" could stir the pulses of his readers by recounting the business of the chase and the performance of individuals; Surtees had the knack of throwing a lifelike picture on the screen and imparting a sense of wind and weather, of scents and sounds, of life and movement in the open air and a wild country. But neither of them had the secret of Whyte-Melville's glamour, which invested the rapturous reality with an air of romance and gave to technical details the momentous import of the operations of war; neither of them kept before his readers, as Whyte-i\ielville did, the ideal of a cultivated, accomplished, lofty-minded, warm-hearted English gentleman. To him must be given the palm among all who have hitherto celebrated the glories of the noblest among British field sports.

Whyte- Melville's end came in the way which, had the choice rested with him, he probably would have preferred. He had rented a small house at Tetbury in Gloucestershire, which a friend once criticised as being too near the churchyard.

"Perhaps it is," replied Whyte-Melville, for some tastes; but the closer the better for a hunt- in mail they will not have so far to carry him."

Careless, almost flippant words, but of unforeseen significance. Not long afterwards, on the 5th of December 1878, the speaker was out with the Vale of White Horse hounds. They had found a fox, but were. still in cover; Whyte- Melville, stealing forward for a start, was galloping along the grass headland of a ploughed field oil favourite hunter, the Shah. No one saw what happened; the good horse must have crossed his legs and fallen oil rider, who was found stone dead. They took him to his little house in Tetbury, whence, to repeat his own words, they had "not so far to carry him," when they laid him in the churchyard hard by.

There was one high-minded gentleman the less in this world—one generous soul the more among the shades.


MONREIT'H, 1898.

There is a complete collection of his books on the Internet Archive and there seems to be a complete set with the Title starting with [Works (Volume x)

The Tarpaulin Jacket

This appears in the Scottish Student's Handbook. The words were written by G. J. Whyte-Melville (1821-1878). The air was written by Charles Coote. Charles Coote was half owner and director of Coote and Tinney Band, the premier London dance orchestra in the 1850s. Coote was still active in the late 1880s, publishing Burlesque Lancers and the polka Hanky Panky in 1887-8. George John Whyte-Melville was a British novelist born in Strathkinnes Fife on June 19, 1821. Whyte-Melville graduated from Eton in 1939. He became captain in the Coldstream Guards in 1846 and retired in 1849. He published his first novel, Digby Grand, in 1853. When the Crimean War broke out Whyte-Melville volunteered as major of Turkish irregular cavalry. After the Crimean War he wrote twenty-one more novels. He died while hunting December 5, 1878.

Click here to listen to the song
The final verse is missing, probably because that is all the 78 inch record could hold.

A tall stalwart lancer lay dying,
And as on his deathbed he lay,
To his friends who around him were sighing,
These last dying words he did say:
Wrap me up in my tarpaulin jacket
And say a poor buffer lies low;
And six stalwart lancers shall carry me
Carry me with steps solemn, mournful and slow.

Had I the wings of a little dove,
Far far away would I fly; I'd fly
Straight for the arms of my true love
And there I would lay me and die.
Wrap me up in my tarpaulin jacket
And say a poor buffer lies low;
And six stalwart lancers shall carry me
Carry me with steps solemn, mournful and slow.

Then get you two little white tombstones
Put them one at my head and my toe, my toe,
And get you a penknife and scratch there:
Here lies a poor buffer below.
Wrap me up in my tarpaulin jacket
And say a poor buffer lies low;
And six stalwart lancers shall carry me
Carry me with steps solemn, mournful and slow.

And get you six brandies and sodas,
And set them all out in a row, a row,
And get you six jolly good fellows
To drink to this buffer below.
Wrap me up in my tarpaulin jacket
And say a poor buffer lies low;
And six stalwart lancers shall carry me
Carry me with steps solemn, mournful and slow.

And then in the calm of the twilight
When the soft winds are whispering low, so low,
And the darkening shadows are falling,
Sometimes think of this buffer below.
Wrap me up in my tarpaulin jacket
And say a poor buffer lies low;
And six stalwart lancers shall carry me
Carry me with steps solemn, mournful and slow.

Riding Recollections (pdf)
By G. J. Whyte-Melville

Return to our Significant Scots page


This comment system requires you to be logged in through either a Disqus account or an account you already have with Google, Twitter, Facebook or Yahoo. In the event you don't have an account with any of these companies then you can create an account with Disqus. All comments are moderated so they won't display until the moderator has approved your comment.

comments powered by Disqus