The father of this celebrated anatomist was the first
efficient professor of the science in tbe University of Edinburgh, and
may be considered as the founder of the medical school for which it has
been subsequently so justly famed. He was a descendant of the Munros of
Milntoun, and grandson of Sir Alexander Monro of Beerscroft—a strenuous
opponent of Oliver Cromwell.
Monro, secundus, was born in this city in
1732; and, although the youngest son, bis father early designed that he
should be his successor, and no exertion was spared to initiate him in
the practice as well as the theory of his profession. That his whole
time and attention might be devoted to the science, his father—presuming
on the strength of thirty years' devotion to the medical chair, and
emboldened by the fame which the seminary bad acquired under his
professorship— ventured to memorialise the Town Council on the subject
of appointing his son assistant and successor. Among other motives which
urged the professor to this step, it is stated in the memorial, that the
acquisition of so much knowledge of an extensive science as a teacher
ought to have, cannot be obtained without some neglect of tbe other
branches; and, therefore, a prospect of suitable advantage from that one
branch must be given, to induce any person to bestow more time and pains
on it than on others.
The memorial thus proceeds:—"That the professor's
youngest son has appeared to his father, for some years past, to have
the qualifications necessary for a teacher; and this winter be has given
proof, not only dissecting all the course of his father, but prelecting
in most of it. That he is already equal to the office; for testimony of
which, it is entreated that inquiry may be made at the numerous students
who were present at his lectures and demonstrations." It was farther
stated, that if "the patrons agreed to the proposition, the education of
the young professor should be directed, with a view to that business,
under the best masters in Europe. He should have all his father's
papers, books, instruments, and preparations, with all the assistance
his father can give in teaching, while he is fit for labour."
This document throws great light upon the history of
the young anatomist, and of the profitable manner in which he had spent
his time. It contains also a plain but sensible statement of his
father's sentiments concerning his proficiency. There was likewise
produced to the patrons certificates from the different Professors of
Latin and Greek, of Philosophy and Mathematics, and of the Professors of
Medicine in the University of Edinburgh, under whom he had studied;
together with attestations from a great number of the students who had
attended his demonstrations and lectures. Evidence was also produced
that he was above twenty-one years of age. These papers were laid before
the patrons in June, 1754, and the prayer of the petition was granted.
Mr. Monro did not immediately repair to the Contineut,
but remained in Scotland for a year. The reason of this was probably a
wish that he might graduate at the University of Edinburgh. This he
accordingly did upon the 20th October, 1755. He chose as the subject of
his thesis "De Testibus et Semine in varus Animalibus." He could hardly
have selected one more difficult to discuss. It is fully twice the size
of ordinary theses, and is accompanied with plates, in order to explain
the situation of the parts, their functions, and his reasoning
concerning them. It is long siuce it became very scarce. Such as have
examined it, uniformly concur iu opinion that it possesses great merit,
and affords an excellent specimen of what was to be expected from him as
a professor of anatomy.
When he went abroad, it was with the view principally
of studying anatomy under the best masters in Europe. At Berlin he
attended Professor Meckel's lectures, whose reputation as an anatomist
stood very high. He now and then referred to him in his own lectures,
and spoke of his old master in very high terms. He was for some time at
Leyden ; but whether he ever visited Paris we are not informed. Upon his
return to Scotland, he was admitted a licentiate of the Edinburgh Eoyal
College of Physicians on the 2nd of May, 1758, and elected a fellow on
the 1st May, 1759.
His character as a lecturer on anatomy stood very
high during the long period that he discharged its duties. As an
anatomist he was well known, not only throughout the British dominions
and in America, but over the whole Continent of Europe; and he
contributed most essentially to spread the fame of the University of
Edinburgh as a medical school. He was not only a skilful anatomist, but
an enthusiast in the study of it; and was constantly employed in
exercising his mechanical genius in inventing and improving surgical
instruments. Neither he nor his father read any of their lectures. His
elocution was distinct—slow, but somewhat formal—and he generally
detained the students more than an hour at lecture. The following,
notice of his death occurs in the Scots Magazine :—
"Oct. 22 [1S17]. At Edinburgh, in the eighty-fifth
year of his age, Alexander Monro of Craiglockhart, Esq., M.D., Professor
of Medicine, Anatomy, and Surgery, in the University of Edinburgh. This
distinguished physician was admitted joint Professor with his father,
12th July, 1754 ; and, during more than half a century, shone as one of
the brightest ornaments of that much and justly celebrated seminary ;
his elegant and scientific lectures attracting students from all
quarters of the globe."
He was succeeded by his son, the present and third
Dr. Alexander Monro in lineal succession, who have reputably held
the professorship upwards of a hundred years.
The print of Dr. Monro was executed in 1790, and is
said to be extremely faithful; indeed, the present Professor thinks it
one of the best representations ever given of any individual.