1843-1846.
THE MISSIONARY SIDE OF 1843.
Scotland’s solution of the Church and State Difficulty—India outside of
party strife—Dr. Brunton writes to the Missionaries—The unanimous
Response of all Evangelical Anglo-Indians—An equitable Settlement of the
Mission Property refused—Dr. Wilson in Jerusalem—Joins the Church of
Scotland Free—Letters to Robert Nesbit and Dr. Brunton—General Assembly
at Glasgow—Dr. Wilson’s Address—First educated Brahman baptized at
Bombay—First Caste Expiation—Epistle from American Presbytery of North
India—Establishment of the Nagpore Mission—Stephen Hislop—Sir Donald
M‘Leod—Kaffrarian Mission transferred to Free Church—Dr. Wilson at
Oxford—At the May Meetings of 1844, and the Inverness Assembly—Medical
Missions—Speech on Turkish Atrocities— Plea for Dhunjeebhoy’s
Ordination—The Ideal of a Missionary Church.— General Assembly’s
Farewell.
When Dr. Wilson left
Bombay he was appointed a representative of the Church of Scotland in
India, in the General Assembly which met in Edinburgh on the 18th of May
1843. On that day, the last of the old historic Kirk, when Dr. Welsh,
the Moderator, read the protest of 470 ministers who laid down their
livings, and they and he, and Thomas Chalmers, and elders representing a
majority of its people, went forth as the Church of Scotland Free, Dr.
Wilson was, on camel-back, entering for the second time the city of
Jerusalem. The Church’s evangelical ministers in Scotland had sacrificed
their all, how would its Indian and Jewish missionaries act? The moral
grandeur of the spectacle on that 18th day of May, in the Scottish
capital, was such as to extort the admiration of judges like Francis
Jeffrey and Lord Cockburn, and of many who had no sympathy with the
spiritual principles involved, but saw in the protesters the legitimate
heirs of, and now the joyous martyrs for, the principles of the
Reformation and Revolution Kirk of Scotland. The same party which did
the wrong on that day have since sought to undo it, by abolishing what
was only an accident of their principles—lay patronage. Although the
remnant of the Church as still established has not yet blotted out what
are known as the Rescissory Acts, by which it endorsed the wrong and
departed from the Reformation and Revolution principle, yet, so recently
as last year, by the mouth of its Moderator it expressed admiration of
the spiritual heroism of the men whom the Courts and the Legislature
drove and the minority of the last General Assembly barred out on that
day. Would the missionaries, then far away, dim or would they increase
the lustre of that sacrifice, by adhering to the protest % The chaplains
of the Church thought it right to cling to their monthly salaries from
the Government, and not to forfeit the pensions given by the East India
Company. No one will judge them. Every missionary, from Pesth and
Constantinople to Calcutta and Madras, Bombay and Poona, joined the
Church of Scotland Free. Yet the Kirk’s Foreign Mission had owed its
origin to Dr. Inglis, father of the present Lord President of the Court
of Session, and was directed by Dr. Brunton, both of the “moderate”
party. The grandeur of the testimony was complete. Missionaries,
ministers, and elders united with the people in 1843, under the guidance
of Thomas Chalmers, to work out in the vexed question of Church and
State the only true solution of the freedom of each within its own
proper sphere, yet the respectful alliance of both, which Italy has
since accepted ; which Mr. Gladstone of English statesmen has most
appreciated; and which, on the part of a spiritually democratic Church,
is as hostile to the sacerdotalism of the Ultramontane as it is a
protest against Csesarism.
During the ten years which preceded the crisis of 1843, all the
missionaries and some of the chaplains at Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras,
sympathised with the evangelical party whom conscience ultimately forced
out. But they were far removed from the conflict and its excitement. And
they had even higher work to do. In the face of a common enemy, or
league of enemies, like the four great Cults of Hindooism, Parseeism,
Muhammadanism, and Fetishism, all non-sacerdotal missionaries, then and
ever since, have formed a union of the widest catholicity and heartiest
co-operation. From the first, too, foreseeing men like Wilson felt that
they were laying the foundations of the future Church of India, and that
it was an evil thing to introduce into it the purely historical and
sectarian controversies of the warring churches of the West. The best
missionary—he who knows the people best—is still a foreigner, and he and
his translations must in time give way to an indigenous and
self-developing church or churches, which may a second time illustrate
the Christian truth of the saying, “Ex Oriente Lux.” Hence the echoes of
the Ten Years’ Conflict, as it is called in Scotland, were somewhat dull
in India, as dull almost as those of the strifes of the home churches
now are to every earnest worker there. That India knows no party is as
true of ecclesiasticism as of politics. What the land-tax shall be in a
province ? whether it shall have certain primary schools and village
institutions 1 how far the historical creeds and sectarian confessions
shall be bound on the necks of the office-bearers of the native churches
—these are questions that affect millions now and] hereafter. Such
issues as these are the true politics of India.
Although correspondents kept Dr. Wilson well informed of the inner life
of their Kirk, and a visitor like Dr. Duff in 1840 brought back from
Edinburgh the latest tidings, they and their colleagues, being in the
true front of the battle, left the security of their base to be looked
to by others. And at the last the crisis in Scotland came with a rush.
The evangelical party, outraged by a majority of eight to five of the
judges, could not believe for a time that Parliament would set the seal
on such an interpretation of Scottish statutes, Union contracts, the
Revolution Settlement. Parliament, never very heroic itself, and
affecting a cynical disbelief in the heroism of others, lent a willing
ear to the small band of men of compromise, who, unprepared for
sacrifice themselves, scouted the idea of it in so many of their
brethren. So it came about that, when Dr. Wilson saw the last of Bombay
for a time, as night settled down on Malabar Hill on the 2d January, he
did not anticipate that his relations with Dr. Brunton were so soon to
cease. At Cairo, when he heard of the Convocation of 478 of the 1200
ordained ministers, who had consulted all through a winter week, and
resolved to resign their livings if justice were not done to the
principles of the Kirk, he must have said for the first time, as his
colleagues in Bombay expressed it—“What will remain? A Presbyterian
Establishment, but not the Church of Scotland; nearly all that
constitutes nationality will have vanished.” To them Dr. Brunton had
written official^, expressing the anxious wish that all would continue
as they were. The chaplains, Dr. Stevenson and Mr. Cook, now Dr. Cook of
Borgue, did so. The missionaries, Messrs. Nesbit and Murray Mitchell,
had kept the public informed of the conflict in Scotland through the
Oriental Christian Spectator, and the receipt of the mail announcing the
event of the 18th May saw them ministers of the Free Church of Scotland.
All the elders and a majority of the members of St. Andrew’s kirk also
left it.
The missionaries had been in the habit of conducting a service for
Europeans residing at a distance from that church in the Ambrolie
Mission-house. The congregation, now greatly increased, found
accommodation in the neighbouring chapel of the American Mission, until
it could erect the building which adorns the Esplanade. The new college
was about to be occupied, and the missionaries who had struggled for so
many years in the confined and unhealthy rooms of a native house, had
been looking forward with eager eyes to the building for which they and
their friends, chiefly on the spot, had raised the necessary funds. They
did not enter it. Not only so, but at the close of the session of 1843,
when Dr. Brunton’s committee established in it a new mission, they had
the pain of making over to the German agent who was sent to demand the
property, the whole library, mathematical, astronomical, chemical, and
other educational apparatus, which were the fruit of their personal toil
and their friends’ generosity. All was quietly given up and carried off,
fortunately without any such scandal as attended a similar act of
transference at Calcutta. It was well that Dr. Wilson was spared his
share of the pain. How he viewed the equity of the proceedings his
correspondence will show. On him, at home, devolved the duty of
furnishing the mission anew, and selecting and sending out the first
Free Church minister. In all this the men who had chosen suffering for
conscience sake made no boast and no complaint—they were Christian
gentlemen. With Dr. Stevenson, who had been their colleague for some
time, their relations had been very close. They did not fail to help
their old Institution, as engaged with themselves in the one great
contest. And now there is a prospect that both may unite with the other
evangelical churches to form a strong and catholic Christian College
like Principal Miller’s in Madras.
For upwards of two months on the march from Cairo to Jerusalem, Dr.
Wilson had been without news. As he sat in the lodging-house of the
Greek, Elias of Damascus, in the Via Dolorosa, at the end of March, and
devoured his letters and a file of papers sent him by the British
Consul, he wrote:—“It would be difficult to say whether, for this day at
least, the natural Jerusalem in the land of Israel, or the spiritual
Zion in the land of Caledonia, was uppermost in our thoughts and
feelings. That the God of Zion reigneth above gave us hope and peace.”
His second visit to Jerusalem with Dr. Graham, and his distant journey
to Damascus, where he left that missionary, caused the time to pass
rapidly till he returned to Beyrut, and rested there for a fortnight. On
the 2d November 1840 Dr. Brunton had thus written to him:—“Our Church
fever is by no means abated. It is carrying its lamentable heats by far
too much into private society, but it has not as yet touched at all our
committee. Nothing can be more harmonious and united than it continues
to be.” As the aggression of the Court of Session on the spiritual
rights in purely spiritual things guaranteed to the national Church of
ministers, elders, and people, continued, it became inevitable that all
its members should declare themselves. Thus, on the 28th April 1842, Dr.
Brunton met the otherwise pleasing announcement of the proposed
foundation of a mission at Nagpore by Sir W. Hill by this response:—“The
only ground of doubt is the present state of the Church. I am forced to
consider our funds as in a very precarious state. Even if the
Establishment escape from the wreck there will be more or less of very
embittered secession. Or, though things remain as they are now, a great
part of the bounty which used to flow in the various channels of
Christian charity is directed to the interminable lawsuits of the
Church. Altogether our prospects are anything but cheering. Human aid
seems of little avail, but God is able to give deliverance. O may He
send it speedily for his own name’s sake ! ” How it was sent, and how it
continued to be sent, the future of the Foreign Missions of Scotland
will reveal.
Dr. Wilson’s first act was to write promptly to his colleague, Mr.
Nesbit, at Bombay. When he arrived at Smyrna he despatched to Dr.
Brunton his resignation, in terms most honourable to both. At the same
time he sent on to Dr. Chalmers, as Moderator, his formal adherence to
the Free Church of Scotland. That document he caused to be published in
Bombay also:—
“Beyrut, 20th June 1843.—My dear Robert—A month before this can reach
you, you will have heard of the rupture which has taken place in the
Church of our beloved native land. It was unavoidable as far as the
faithful ministers of Christ are concerned ; and it will be overruled, I
doubt not, for the great extension of vital religion throughout the
country. From Smyrna—for which I sail to-day in the Austrian steamer—I
intend to send in my adherence as a minister and missionary to the Free
Church ; and I firmly believe that we shall all be found in the same
fellowship. Whether any plan of co-operation with the Moderates may now
be practicable or desirable I do not know, though a few weeks ago I
dropped a hint to Dr. Brunton on the subject. One thing is evident, we
cannot be divorced from the counsels and prayers of those whose
principles and actings have our conscientious and strong approbation.
“The question connected -with our mission property in Bombay must, I
think, be determined on principles of equity. It will be of great
consequence for us to get occupation as soon as possible of the new
buildings. The onus of legal proceedings—should such be resorted to—will
rest on the Moderates, if we are first in possession. I shall propose
that we give the Moderates a fair share of the price should they ask it
from us.
“A regard to the souls of the present and future generations of our
countrymen in India demands our decided action in behalf of the Free
Church. Assemble its adherents in Bombay and Poona, promise the
continuance of your services to them till regular pastors be provided,
and forthwith petition for these pastors. I hope that we shall hear of
your proceedings before the meeting of Assembly at Glasgow in October. I
shall do all there in my power in support of your prayer. Tell Captains
George and John Jameson, Archie Graham, Captain Thornbury, Mr. Spencer,
Mr. Fallon, Mr. Martin, and Dr. Malcolmson, etc. etc., that I expect
them in particular to be among the first who will rally round the old
flag of the Covenant.”
TO DR. BRUNTON
“Smyrna, July 1843.—My very dear Sir—The rupture which has taken place
in our beloved Church, which to the last moment I had fondly thought
would have been averted by the Government considering its righteous
claims, or by both parties within the Church agreeing to uphold at least
its spiritual independence, has forced me impartially and prayerfully to
consider to which of the two separated bodies it is my duty to adhere.
My decision is in favour of the free protesting Church; of the
principles professed and advocated by which I have long conscientiously
approved.
“In these circumstances it has become my painful duty to intimate, as I
now do, my withdrawal as a minister and missionary from the Established
Church of Scotland, with which I have so long considered it an honour
and a privilege to be connected. I take this momentous step from my
desire to bear and maintain a conscience void of offence toward God and
man, and, I trust, without a breach of that charity which it becomes me
to cherish towards those with whose judgment my own has been found at
variance. I take it with inexpressible regret, as far as it involves the
dissolution of that official tie which has so long bound me to yourself,
who have ever treated me with more than paternal kindness, and
strengthened my hands and encouraged my heart in the work of the Lord
more than I can declare. I feel at this moment the unfeigned sorrow of a
great bereavement, and it is my humble but fervent prayer that the Lord
may comfort us both in the afflictive circumstances in which we are
placed in His inscrutable providence. To the latest moment of my life I
can never forget, or lightly estimate, the multiplied favours which I
have experienced at your hands ; and if God will that we should soon
meet together, I shall tender to you the homage of my unfeigned
gratitude.
“Your interest in the continued prosperity of our mission, which you
have done so much to advance, will, I am certain, remain undirninished.
In a postscript attached to my last letter I expressed the hope that
some plan of co-operation between the two sections of our Church might
be devised. The terms on which the separation has taken place, however,
have for the present annihilated that hope. Had the Residuary Assembly
not consented, as I humbly but firmly believe it has done, to the utter
overthrow of the scriptural and constitutional liberties of the Church,
the case might have been otherwise. —I am, my dearest Sir, yours in the
bonds of Christian love and gratitude,
“John Wilson.”
“Bilstanebrae, 12th June 1843.
“My dear Dr. Wilson—I have received with great thankfulness your very
kind letter from Beyrut. I rejoice to find that you have safely passed a
perilous part of your journey without harm, and commit you for the
remainder of it to the same protection. Your packets to Dr. Keith I
delivered immediately. The opportunity, indeed, came before I had the
satisfaction of perusing them. I expect that he will afford me that
pleasure still. In the meantime the details of your progress which you
have sent to myself will, I am quite sure, awaken in the public the same
interest which I felt in reading them.
“The calamity which you anticipate has befalleu ; and with an extent and
an exasperation with which I had by no means laid my account. Our
brethren who have left us have announced their purpose, to enter
immediately on missionary enterprise; I have rejected repeatedly and
unhesitatingly declined such a proposal as the one which you suggest.
This theme I have uniformly shunned in my correspondence with India,
unless perhaps by a hint at its financial bearing, because I could not
see how the point in dispute could in the least touch the status of our
brethren in India. But, of course, after the Disruption took place, I
was directed to state to each of the Missions that the Established
Church was resolved to go on with all of her schemes as before, and
counted in her day of peril on the zealous co-operation of those whom
she had found so admirably qualified for their work. Reports are loudly
circulated here that my appeal comes too late. I cannot allow myself to
believe it. I cannot think that those with whom our intercourse hitherto
has been so delightful to us would pledge themselves, as they are said
to have done, without giving us the shadow of warning. This would be to
peril to an enormous extent the safety of our great cause ; as well as,
in many other respects, to be a source of very painful feeling. Even
now, when it has become necessary to make a direct appeal, I have in no
one instance introduced one word of personal pleading ; but you will
easily understand how painful my personal feelings are. May the Lord
Himself direct you to that which is right, and may He who is able to
bring good out of evil cause this sore calamity to minister to the
advancement of His glory and of the Gospel cause. It is not easy for man
to see how this result is to be reached; but with Him all things are
possible. We are determined, through his blessing, to persevere. So far
as human aid avails we have the prospect of abundant funds. But if works
of the purest charity are to be henceforward channels for estrangement,
and contention, and strife, my whole heart shrinks from what used to be
its joy.
“I cannot mix up this subject with any other; indeed I have nothing else
that is interesting to communicate. I need not say how very anxious I
shall be to hear from you, nor how much I am, yours affectionately,
“Alex. Brunton.”
“Munich, 11th September 1843.
“My very dear Sir—On the evening of the day on which I last addressed
you, I received your kind letter of the 12th of June. Though it could
not alter the decision, which I had intimated to you, of my adherence to
the Free Church, I could not peruse it without the deepest emotion. It
made me realise in all its extent your exceeding kindness and
consideration during the whole period of our official connection, and
imparted to me the deepest sorrow. To no individual do I feel a stronger
attachment, and for no individual do I cherish a more profound regard
than yourself; and could anything of a personal nature have prevailed
with me in my choice of the ground which I should occupy after the
rupture in our beloved Church, I should have been found still ranged by
your side in the missionary enterprise.
“I feel it extremely difficult at once to do justice to the credit which
I give to those from whom I differ in my judgment as to late events in
our Church, and to express the conviction which I feel that my own
sentiments are in accordance with the will of Christ. I may be permitted
to say, however, that I do think that the Free Church, as far as
constitutional principle is concerned, is essentially the Church of
Scotland, and that in cleaving to it I am only following out my
ordination vows according to my conscientious interpretation of them. In
your official correspondence with the missionaries you shunned, as you
intimate, all reference to the existing controversies, except in their
financial bearing; and my former silence on the subject originated in my
respect for your own example, and my reluctance to hold out any threat,
however humble, to those with whom I might ultimately be found at
variance. Though as a missionary employed by both parties I was silent
in the discussion, yet as a member of the Kirk-Session of Bombay I
uniformly supported non-intrusion principles. I constantly opposed
premature division in India, and I have a letter from Mr. Cook cordially
thanking me for my co-operation and friendship. It was only when the
Government proved relentless, and multitudes conspired to overthrow the
spiritual liberties and discipline of the Church, that I was compelled
as a missionary to give in my adherence to the body of whose principles
and contendings I approved. Had your own charitable and peaceful
remonstrances and pleadings for upholding the authority of the Church
prevailed with the body with which you are now associated, the schism I
am persuaded would not have occurred.
“Had it appeared that our practical operations in India would likely
suffer by our leaving the Establishment, and that it was possible for
the Establishment immediately to supply our lack of service, I should
have considered it a duty for us to give adequate warning of our
intention to forsake that Establishment. I have not yet seen, however,
that any of our operations require to be abandoned ; and should the
Establishment send any faithful missionaries to India, I for one shall
most cordially bid them God speed, rejoicing that they preach Christ to
the heathen Hindus.
“Perhaps I have erred in thinking these few remarks of explanation
called for by your kind letter; if so, I am sure that you will excuse
me. I hope very soon to see you in Edinburgh ; and I confidently trust
that I shall ever vindicate the sincerity with which I subscribe myself,
as of old, yours most gratefully and affectionately, John Wilson.”
“Rev. Dr. Brunton.”
The General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland, which met at the
end of May under Dr. Chalmers, had necessarily to leave the details of
organisation to be worked out after it rose. Hence the meeting of a
second General Assembly in the same year, instead of such a “Commission”
of Assembly as holds quarterly meetings every year but with restricted
powers. At Glasgow, on the 17th October, and with Dr. Thomas Brown of
St. John’s, Moderator, this special Assembly met. The five months that
had passed showed 754 congregations and 730 ministers and preachers. Of
these 465 had given up their livings in the Established Church, and 110
licentiates and others since licensed to preach, their certain
appointment to livings. There remained the twenty-one missionaries,
fourteen in India and seven to the Jews, and in due time the adherence
of all of these was announced. When men like the last Marquis of
Breadalbane; Mr. Fox Maule, afterwards Earl of Dalhousie, who had in
vain brought before the House of Commons “the question of the spiritual
independence of the Church and the rights of the Christian people of
ScotlandMr. Murray Dunlop, M.P.; Dr. Chalmers and Dr. Candlish had
reported arrangements resulting in a response from the country to the
amount of £300,000 in that brief period, Dr. Gordon submitted the
statement of the India Mission.
In answer to those friends of the missionary cause who had deprecated
the long defence of their spiritual rights by the people of Scotland, on
the ground that it was “not a religious question,” he pointed to “the
striking fact that the missionaries of the Church of Scotland,
possessing in an eminent degree the esteem and confidence of the
Christian public both at home and abroad, as holy and devoted men of God
quietly pursuing their pious labours far from the scene of controversy,
and as calm observers watching from a distance the progress of the
conflict, should, the moment that conflict ended, have unanimously and
without hesitation united themselves to their protesting brethren.” But
while Dr. Chalmers could announce his third of a million, chiefly due to
that unique contribution to ecclesiastical economics, the Sustentation
Fund for the ministers, Dr. Gordon could, at that early stage, when no
appeal had been made, report only £327 as the fund with which the Church
nevertheless resolved, as Dr. Forbes put it, to continue the “gigantic
scheme of Church Extension ” among a population which was then estimated
at 160 millions, but will be shown, by the second imperial census in
1881, to be nearer 260 millions as British India now is. The fourteen
foreign missionaries of 1843-41 have grown in number to forty ordained
men, Native and Scottish ; the £327 of October 1843 and £6402 of the
whole year, to £30,657 a year in Scotland alone, and nearly double that
if the whole annual revenue of the Indian, African, and South Pacific
Missions be considered. In the thirty-six years since that time the
Church of these fourteen missionaries has given in Scotland alone,
£550,000 for foreign missions, and there is not a contributor who does
not admit that the amount might have been and will yet be doubled. The
conflict of the ten years before 1843, and the struggles of Cameron, the
Erskines, and Gillespie before that, will not be exhausted until the
three great branches of the Reformation Kirk of John Knox are gathered
once again into one reconstructed Church, as free in its own legitimate
sphere as the statutes of the Reformation, the treaty of Union and the
Revolution Settlement acknowledged it to be. This is, thus far,
Scotland’s contribution to the question which Pope and Emperor in Italy
and Germany are trying to work out on the hopelessly irreconcilable,
because intolerant, lines of Ultramontane tyranny and Caesarist
encroachment; and Dr. Wilson often declared it to be so. The freewill
offerings of the members of the Free Church of Scotland every year, for
all spiritual purposes at home and abroad, nearly equal £600,000. In all
it has raised the sum of thirteen millions sterling1 side by side with
higher moral aims, and as the fruit of a deeper spiritual life.
According to Mr. W. Holms, M.P., himself a member of the Established
Church, who stated in the House of Commons debate on the 18th June 1878:
“There are 1517 churches attached to the Free and United Presbyterian
Churches against 1390 attached to the Established Church. And these last
comprise about 300 Highland charges, most of them very meagrely
attended. In regard to the money raised for religious purposes during
the year 1877-78, which was not an unfair test of vitality and power,
£965,000 had been contributed by Free and United Presbyterians, against
£385,000 by the Established Church.”
Dr. Wilson’s first speech in the General Assembly is remembered to this
day for the length as well as the eloquence of its statements of fact
and pictures of Oriental superstitions and missionary life. To the
attitude of the religions of the East towards the Christian demand for
their surrender he happily applied the remark of Tippoo, when the
British forces surrounded the last stronghold of Seringapatam—“I am
afraid, but afraid not so much of what is seen as of what is unseen.”
First in the list of the principal means of propagating the Gospel in
India he placed those used by the Lord and His apostles, as he had done
from the day he took possession of Bombay—“conversation, discussion,
public preaching, among all classes of men to whom they could find
access, and in all situations in which they could be advantageously
practised.” After an account of the work of his colleagues, and of the
agents of other Churches in every case, he briefly describes his own:—“I
have declared the doctrine of the Cross in three languages, the Marathee,
Hindostanee, and Goojaratee, from the Shirawutee in Canara to Sirohee in
Bajpootana, and from Bombay to Berar.” Second in his enumeration of
agencies came the translation of the Scriptures into the languages of
India, and the publication of works showing the evidence of their truth;
of “plain but affectionate ” expositions of their contents ; and of
demonstrations of the vanity, falsity, and immorality of the systems of
error to which they are opposed. Again, after a generous tribute to the
work of others, he briefly stated his own, adding, “It was my privilege
to act for twelve years as secretary to the different translation
committees of the Bombay Bible Society.” Besides the English, Marathee,
Goojaratee, Hindostanee, Persian, and Hebrew, in which his own writings
had appeared, the missionaries of other societies had translated them
into Bengalee, Hindee, Tamul, and Canarese. On the third agency of
schools Dr. Wilson gave a fair and full summing-up of a question much
disputed in this country, though long set at rest in favour of
education, higher and lower, by experienced men of all churches in
India, so far as Hindoos, Parsees, Buddhists, and Muhammadans, or the
non-aboriginal races, are concerned. This was followed by equally
weighty utterances on the two questions which lie at the foundation of
the indigenous Church of India, native congregations and native
ministers. The Moderator, according to the newspapers of the day, in an
eloquent address conveyed the thanks of the General Assembly to Dr.
Wilson.
While he was yet speaking there was intelligence on its way from Bombay
which gave a new point to the opinions he so emphatically expressed. An
educated Brahman youth, now the Rev. Narayan Sheshadri, and long one of
the most successful ordained ministers in India, asked to be baptized.
He was one of the few Hindoos who had clung to the mission college when
the Parsee baptisms in 1839 produced a panic throughout native Bombay.
The first educated Brahman baptized in the island, he was the direct
fruit of the higher Christian education, and a worthy associate of the
two Parsees who had anticipated him. Mr. Nesbit’s loving gentleness, and
Dr. Murray Mitchell’s efficient instructions, had continued the good
work begun by Dr. Wilson. It seemed likely that both Narayan and his
younger brother Shripat would have been allowed to live and study
together, holding kindly intercourse with their parents. But the
prospect was too much for those who had recently seen toleration
triumphant in the case of the two Parsees, and were the more determined
“ to contest every inch of ground with advancing Christianity.” So the
appeal was again made not to reason or truth, but to the civil courts,
for Shripat was not sixteen years of age. The “ age of discretion ”
rule, the intelligence and sincerity of the youth rather than the age by
the horoscope ever difficult to be proved, were pronounced by Sir
Erskine Perry to be “not worth a farthing,” and Shripat exclaimed, when
declared too young to exercise the rights of conscience—“Am I to be
compelled to worship idols ”
The scene has often since been repeated in the courts of India, purely
English as well as those administering Hindoo and Muhammadan law; and
legislation has yet, in this matter alone happily, to complete the
little code securing bare toleration, which Bentinck and Dalhousie
began, and Sir Henry Maine and Sir James F. Stephen have amplified. “To
this sorrowful question of Shripat’s,” writes an eyewitness, “no answer
was returned. Mr. Nesbit was greatly attached to Shripat, and when the
weeping boy bade him farewell as they quitted the court-house, he kissed
him with much affection, and wept with him.” Shripat was never allowed
to become a Christian, but it took a long time to shake him by arts such
as Faust has made the colder West believe to be but the legendary
fictions of a dark age. And since Shripat had eaten with his baptized
brother, his case became the first, also, of a long series of gradually
weakening concessions by caste, as Christianity practically teaches that
God has made of one blood all nations of men. Not only in Maharashtra,
but in the holiest conclave at Benares, and among the most exclusive of
the five Koolin clans of Bengal, the very practical question was hotly
debated—“ Can Shripat be purified and restored to caste ? ” Hindooism
was on its trial, for if it yielded now what horror might not come next,
till the one last bond was cut in every link? A rich minority spent vast
sums to develop dogmatically Hindooism into something that would
tolerate the Zeit-Geist, ease their own consciences, and perhaps connive
at their forbidden pleasures. Thus, travelling by railway was afterwards
sacerdotally sanctioned, for would not the pilgrim arrive at his
journey’s end with more in his purse? But the year 1843 was too early
for the minority, who had got Shripat to swallow the five products of
the cow (its urine, etc.), and enriched a priest to conduct the
purification. All who had thus combined were themselves threatened with
excommunication, and the priest was as severely handled as if he had
been a Christian. The “ liberal ” Brahmans publicly confessed their
fault, and drank water in which an idol had been washed and ten Brahmans
had dipped each his right foot. For the rest the scandal was hushed up,
many feeling it would have been better if Shripat had never been dragged
before the English judges. While Narayan and Pestonjee continued their
studies for licence and ordination in Bombay, Dhunjeebhoy Nourojee
completed his college examinations in Edinburgh, and as a preacher and
speaker gave a vivid interest to the missionary cause in Scotland.
The day before the General Assembly sat at Glasgow the Presbytery of
Bombay had received a formal letter of sympathy from Allahabad, one of
the four presbyteries in north India of the church of the United States.
The brotherly document was signed by the Rev. J. Warren and the Rev. J.
Owen, the latter a learned scholar who was long spared to build up the
native church. It has more than a curious interest, as contributing the
experience of a Republic which, itself born of the intolerance of the
Tudors and the Stewarts, has never found a difficulty in recognising and
protecting the legitimate spiritual independence of all churches, even
that of Rome. The letter anticipated the time, since realised as to
co-operation, when all Presbyterians in India may meet in fellowship,
and ultimately in General Assembly.
In his address to the General Assembly Dr. Wilson declared the most
clamant need of India to be the establishment of a Christian mission in
its Central Provinces. At Nagpore, nearly equidistant from Bombay,
Calcutta, and Madras about seven hundred miles, a Raja of the Bhonsla
family of Marathas reigned, like the Gaekwar at Baroda, Holkar at
Indore, and Sindia at Gwalior. He had been guided by a political
Resident so able as Sir Richard Jenkins, and was protected by a combined
force of British troops and Madras sepoys at the adjoining cantonment of
Kamptee. Stationed there as Deputy Judge-Advocate General, was a Madras
officer, Captain, now Sir William Hill, K.C.S.I. He and his wife had
long lamented the want of a missionary to evangelise the people. Nor had
their desire been fulfilled by the establishment, two hundred miles
away, of the industrial or artisan mission of Pastor Gossner of Berlin
among the aboriginal Gonds, whose cause Sir Donald M‘Leod, when a
district officer among them, had long advocated. On the death of his
wife Captain Hill resolved to devote her small fortune of £2000, adding
to it £500, the whole in three per cents, to the endowment of a mission
to the people of Kamptliee, Nag-pore, and the neighbourhood. He applied
to Dr. Wilson, in February 1842, as the missionary best known to him by
reputation, offering the amount for a Presbyterian or Church of England
Mission. The fruitless result of Dr. Wilson’s application to Dr. Brunton
has been stated. But his representations to the committee of the Free
Church met with such a response that the only difficulty left was to
secure a missionary, at a time when every licensed preacher, young and
old, was required at home.
Happily Stephen Hislop offered himself; a man, as it proved, after
Wilson’s own heart. Fresh from a distinguished career at the
Universities of Glasgow and Edinburgh and the New College, he was an
accurate scholar and a keen naturalist.
He proved to be a patient linguist, a worker of rare political insight
and administrative power, and, above all, an enthusiast in the spiritual
work he had undertaken. All the arrangements at the home end, for
fitting out and securing the success of the new mission, fell upon Dr.
Wilson, as those in India had devolved upon him in the case of the Irish
settlement in Goojarat. But in spite of the need for rest, and the
general work of the Church, he and Mr. Hislop so co-operated that, by
the end of 1844, the new apostle—in time to prove a martyr by his death
in the midst of duty—left for the scene of his labours. We shall hear
more of Stephen Hislop. This Nagpore Mission is consecrated by the
memory of another Christian official of the civil service, as Sir
William Hill was of the military—Sir Donald M‘Leod—who, after a
brilliant career ending as Lieutenant-Governor of the Punjab, and giving
his last days to philanthropic work in London, was killed when
attempting to enter a train in motion, on his way to a meeting of the
Christian Vernacular Education Society.
Donald M‘Leod was the man to whom this double testimony was borne by a
Rajpoot and a Sikh. Behari Lai Singh, a Rajpoot official subordinate to
him, was led to believe that “ Christianity was something living,” and
ultimately died an ordained missionary of the Presbyterian Church of
England, by what he described as “ the pious example of this gentleman,
his integrity, his disinterestedness, his active benevolence. Here is a
man in the receipt of 2000 or 3000 rupees annually ; he spends little on
himself, and gives away the surplus for education—the temporal and
spiritual welfare of my countrymen. This was the turning-point of my
religious history, and led to my conversion.” More recently a Sikh
declared, “If all Christians were like Sir Donald M‘Leod there would be
no Hindoos or Muhammadans.” Of the M‘Leods of Assynt and proprietors of
Geanies, one of the three great branches of the old Norwegian clan,
young Donald passed from the Edinburgh High School to Putney, where he
had Lord Canning and Henry Carre Tucker for schoolfellows; and to
Haileybury, where he first won the admiration of Lord Lawrence. When at
his first station of Monghyr in 1831, he learned from his countryman,
the Rev. A. Leslie—the Baptist missionary who helped Sir H. Havelock—to
adopt the words of Pascal as his own : Religion has “abased me
infinitely more than unassisted reason, yet without producing despair;
and exalted me infinitely more than pride, yet without puffing up.” When
he passed to the Thuggee department, created by Lord William Bentinck to
put down organised robbery and murder by strangling, and on to the
administration of the Saugur and Nerbudda highlands, ceded by the
Marathas in 1818, where Seonee was his headquarters, he was soon
attracted to Dr. Wilson. From 1836, to his death in 1872, they assisted
each other in philanthropic enterprise and scholarly research.
To the India Mission, thus increased, the Free Church added, in 1844,
the African stations in Kaffraria, offered to it by the Glasgow
Missionary Society; and it soon after sent out two other ministers
familiar with Dutch, who for a time conducted missionary operations in
Cape Town itself. Thus a new impetus and extension were given to a
mission which has made the Lovedale Institution not only the centre and
head of all civilising work among the natives of South Africa, in the
opinion of observers like Mr. Anthony Trollope and Sir Bartle Frere, but
the base of that advance into the Lake Region which has resulted in the
establishment of the Living-stonia settlement on Nyassa. The cause of
native female education also, in India, made a fresh start. The Ladies’
Association was strengthened by the co-operation of the Glasgow
Association on behalf of female education in South Africa up to 1865,
when both combined to form the present invaluable agency which is
carrying light into the Zananas of the most caste-bound families.
Hardly had the Glasgow Assembly risen when Dr. Wilson found himself
absorbed for a time in preaching and addressing large audiences of all
the evangelical Churches, now on the Free Church of Scotland’s assertion
of its principles, but more frequently on the missionary claims of
India. In November 1843 he opened the new Free Church in his native town
of Lauder, to which nearly the whole community flocked to hear the youth
who had done such great things in India. His old master, Mr. Paterson,
took care that he should preside at the examination of the school, in
circumstances very different from those under which he used, on his
tours, to stoop under the leafy sheds of the jungle schools of the
Konkan, or the low roofs of the bungalows of Bombay and Surat.
Invitations to preach flowed in upon him from all parts, from Dr. James
Hamilton of London to Dr. James Lewis and Mr. Thorburn of Leith. It was
when Dr. Wilson addressed the children in St. John’s, Leith, that his
present biographer first saw the even then youthful apostle, and heard
the rhythmic roll of his sentences as hundreds learned from him for the
first time of the Hindoo idols and the Parsee fire, of the scattered
Beni-Israel, and the devil-worshippers and man-sacrificers of the Indian
hills.
Dr. Wilson was selected by his Church to accompany Dr. Candlish to
England. At Oxford, on the 17th March 1844, he preached to the elite of
the University and the Church of England there a sermon on “ The Church
Glorious before its Lord,” from Ephesians v. 25-27. The academic tone of
the discourse, and the learning and long self-sacrificing labours of the
preacher, combined to call forth a degree of ecclesiastical appreciation
as well as missionary sympathy which a local journalist thus expressed
when it was published :—“ The great movement in Scotland is a new thing
under the sun. It is little less than a breaking up and recasting of a
nation. It is developing events which mere politicians cannot
understand, and which they will be unable to guide. The freedom of the
Christian Church in its corporate character has been asserted. And, as
we believe, the further assertion of the freedom and equality of
Christian men, and of every distinct Christian assembly will follow.” At
the annual meeting of the Wesleyan Missionary Society, Sir George Bose
in the chair, he was introduced by Dr. Bunting; when, answering the
attacks of the late Cardinal Wiseman on Protestant Missions, he made a
valuable contribution to that little-known subject—Boman Catholic
Missions in India; referring to such Portuguese authorities as the Life
of Juan de Castro, one of the earliest Viceroys, and a letter from John
I. of Portugal, to be found in that classic. u Dr. Wiseman thinks very
little of Protestant efforts,” he concluded, “ but the Brahmans make a
great deal of them. I this morning read a tract written against
Christianity and addressed to myself by a Brahman. He tells his
countrymen that, unless they act together, all their power and religion
are doomed. And, for the sake of the inhabitants of India who have been
most marvellously placed under the sway of this Christian country, we
wish the doom of Brahmanism. Wishing them good, we must endeavour to
save them from the contaminating and ruining power of sin, and prepare
them for the glories of heaven. . . . Increase your labourers in India,
and look for the divine blessing.” Addressing the Baptist Society, over
which Mr. W. B. Gurney presided, and the British Society for the Jews,
he excited enthusiasm l3y his fresh and generous descriptions of the
labours of their agents, and his appeals for a wide extension of their
agencies. “The names of Carey, of Marshman, and of Ward, had been long
familiar to me,” he said to the former, “before I finished my studies at
the University. Dr. Marshman gave me the right hand of fellowship before
I proceeded to India; and he was among the first, with a generous heart,
to welcome me to its shores.”
From his English raid he hurried back to be present as a representative
of Bombay at the General Assembly of 1844. There, at its successor, and
at the remarkable Assembly of Inverness in August 1845, when Dr.
Macdonald of Ferintosh, the Moderator, preached in Gaelic, from Dr.
Wilson’s familiar text—“ Those that have turned the world upside down
have come hither also”—the Bombay missionary was true to his calling. At
the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, held in 1844
in Londonderry, he was received with “loud acclamations” as the
co-founder of the mission to the two millions of Kathiawar; and he
afterwards gave much of his time to providing means for the extension of
that mission. At the Birmingham meeting of the Synod of the English
Presbyterian Church in 1845, he stood, side by side with Mr. Milne from
China, as a deputy with Dr. Beith from the Free Church of Scotland.
When, in the same year, addressing the Edinburgh Medical Missionary
Society, which has since done much for the people of India, he said—“I
recollect being asked by Sir Robert Grant, the late Governor of Bombay,
what would be the effect of dissecting a dead body' in the Poona
Sanskrit College. Why, said I, the first effect certainly would be that
the Brahmans would jump out at the windows; and the second effect would
be, on their re-entering, that the gods would jump out also; or, in
other words, their religious prejudices would take to flight.” The Grant
Medical College in Western, and the Bengal Medical College in Eastern
India, where a Brahman student of Dr. Duff’s was one of the first
Hindoos to dissect the human subject, have produced great results. It
was in emphatic language that he induced the Assembly of 1844 to
memorialise Her Majesty’s Government on the impotence and misrule of the
Ottoman Porte alike in Asia and in Europe. Nor did he spare Russia’s
intolerance.
In all Dr. Wilson’s correspondence, confidential as well as public, we
have met with no expression of his opinions more worthy of his whole
work for and relation to the Native Church of India, than a letter on
the ordination of Dhunjeebhoy to Dr. James Buchanan, who had succeeded
Dr. Gordon at the head of the Foreign Missions Committee. He pleaded,
and with success finally, for what at the present time it is difficult
to believe even those most ignorant of India could have doubted,—the
spiritual and ecclesiastical rights of the educated native converts, in
the light of justice and expediency, of the equality of Presbyterianism
and the future of the Indian Church. The Parsee “probationer” himself,
who had already become popular as a preacher all over the country,
intimated that, unless full evangelistic power and liberty were conceded
to him, he would not enter the service of the Free Church, and Dr.
Wilson reported to Mr. Nesbit, “his firmness in this respect has been
admired. We are for natives being ordained, after due probation, as
missionaries or evangelists like ourselves.”
It was well that he and Dr. W. S. Mackay of Calcutta happened to be in
Scotland when their Church, naturally absorbed in its domestic and
internal organisation, was also called to lay anew the foundations of
its Foreign Mission broad and deep. The missionary buildings at Poona
were not affected by the ecclesiastical changes, and those at Madras had
been rented only. But the property made over to the Established Church
had cost £10,000 at Calcutta and £8000 at Bombay, exclusive of libraries
and apparatus. The duty of raising £20,000 for a new start fell upon Dr.
Wilson and Dr. W. S. Mackay, then on sick leave from Calcutta. How
generously the whole India Mission was aided, not so much by the public
effort as by private and anonymous gifts, the missionary correspondence
of the period reveals. Even more remarkable was the liberality of
Christian men of all sects in India itself. To that the Free Churches in
Bombay and Calcutta owe their existence.
As the Sustentation Fund, devised by the greatest writer and most
practical worker in the field of Christian and Philanthropic Economics,
Dr. Chalmers, became consolidated for the support of the home ministers,
it would have been well if a somewhat similar self-acting and
self-developing arrangement had been then made proportionately for the
growing foreign missions. But Dr. Wilson seems to have attempted the
institution of a system which, it is to be hoped, all the churches will
yet adopt in the place of, or in addition to, desultory offerings. He
induced Dr. Candlish and Dr. Gordon to arrange that St. George’s and the
New North congregations should provide the support of the two Parsee
missionaries. The former, which gave £63 for the object in 1840, now
subscribes to the Foreign Mission Fund about £700 of its whole annual
contributions of £10,000. If it undertook directly to provide for two
missionaries, who would report to it as well as to the central
committee, the congregational life would be completed on its missionary
as well as home side; while the missionaries would be brought into
closer contact with the churches and with their youth, who are to be
their successors. Only where each congregation, able to raise at least
£200 a year in addition to the income of its own minister, thus does its
duty to the Master by sending forth an ordained Native or European
missionary, will the wide fields of Heathenism and Muhammadanism be
adequately overtaken, and the churches of Christendom prove their
spiritual loyalty. When that union of sects, for which Dr. Wilson
longed, comes about, so that ecclesiastical waste and suicidal divisions
shall be reduced to a minimum, this ideal may be reached.
It was in the year 1844, when he was forty years of age, that Dr. Wilson
sat to Mr. James Caw for that portrait which has since adorned the walls
of the Free Church College in Bombay. It was painted at the request of
the students, and was pronounced a good likeness of the founder of the
mission there. A fine mezzotint engraving by Mr. Henry Haig was made for
the public at home.
The General Assembly of 1846 formally declared that they “rejoiced in
the prospect of Dr. Wilson’s return to Bombay in renovated health.” They
recommended all ministers of the Church, “at least once a year, about
the opening of the college session,” to bring the claims of foreign
missions specially before their congregations, and “to enforce upon them
the duties of prayer and self-denial.” |