Search just our sites by using our customised search engine

Unique Cottages | Electric Scotland's Classified Directory

Click here to get a Printer Friendly PageSmiley

Easter Ross
The Sculptured Stones

The Sculptured Stone monuments of Scotland may be considered the earliest existing expression of the ideas, and the most genuine records of the skill in art of the early inhabitants of Scotland; but now, when attention has been directed to them it is found that they are diminished in numbers and in many cases mutilated in their form. It is therefore satisfactory to know that in Easter Ross is found a number larger and of more exquisite workmanship than have yet been discovered in any one district in Scotland.

It has been supposed that the sculptured standing stones succeeded the rough unhewn obelisks which appear so frequently in Scotland, or that Christian sculptures were put on pillars previously erected, and it was a primitive custom to erect stones for purposes of devotion, memorials of events, and evidences of facts even down to early Christian times, and such monuments were distinguished by their having a cross inscribed on them. Their purpose and meaning, however, seem to have been forgotten ere the time came when they could be written, though even yet in some such form men continue to hope to hand down their memory to future times. There is no difficulty in supposing that many of our Scottish monuments are sepulchral and may mark the last resting place of the most illustrious of the early heroes and missionaries, and it is easy to understand how others would wish to be laid near the same spot, and how they would be chosen as fit sites for the churches, and those in Easter Ross followed this rule.

The labour bestowed on the ornamentation of these stones, and especially on the crosses, is quite remarkable, and some would attribute it to Roman civilization from which so much of medimval art must have derived an impression. But if the symbols could have been derived from this source, it is difficult to explain why other countries open to the same influence do not have them. If the symbols are Christian, it seems strange that they are not found in other parts of Christendom as well as in the north-east of Scotland. The only inference open is that most of the symbols were peculiar to a people in the north-east of Scotland and were used by them at least partly for sepulchral monuments. To the question, Whence did the inhabitants of this district get their symbols? there is no convincing answer.

Of the stones in Easter Ross those best known are the Hilton, the Shandwick, and [the Nigg stones which stood at no great distance from one another. They are perhaps the most remarkable in Scotland for their elaborate finish and varied representation. The Hilton stone now in “The American Gardens” at Invergordon was at some period taken down and converted into a gravestone. For this purpose one of the sides was smoothed by erasing the ancient sculpture upon it and the following incription was substituted :—

“He that lives weill dies weil,” says Solomon the wise.
Heir lyes Alexander Duff and his thrie wives.

In this stone the “spectacle” ornament is transferred to the border amid the ornamental tracery, while two unconnected circles take the usual place on the face of the stone near the crescent, the whole being filled up with elaborate tracery. The two figures in the upper corner on the right hand seem to have been trumpeters. The centre is thickly occupied by the figures of men, some on horseback, some afoot, of wild and tame animals, musical instruments, and weapons of war and of the chase.

The Shandwick stone is a magnificent obelisk near the village of Shandwick. In 1776 it was surrounded at the base by large well-cut flagstones formed like steps. It was unfortunately blown down in April 1847 and broken, but soon afterwards it was, by the order of Sir Charles Ross, bound up with iron and re-erected on its ancient site. It is about eight feet high, four feet broad, and one foot thick. It has been supposed that the figures on each side of the cross, immediately beneath the transverse bars are intended to represent St. Andrew on his cross, but it may be doubted whether they are not meant to represent angels with displayed wings. Hugh Miller says that it bears on the side which corresponds to the obliterated surface of the other, the figure of a large cross, wrought into an involved and intricate species of fretwork, which seems formed by the twisting of myriads of snakes. In the spaces of the left side of the shaft, there are huge clumsy looking animals, the one resembling an elephant, the other a lion; over each of these a St. Andrew seems leaning forward from the cross, and in the reverse of the obelisk, the sculpture represents processions, hunting scenes, and combats. The ground around was for ages used as a burying place, and all unbaptized infants of the parish were buried here up till fairly recent times. The ground around is now cultivated.

The exquisitely beautiful Nigg stone now stands under a portico at the east gable of Nigg Parish Church but it stood near the gate till 1727, when it was blown down by a blast of wind which also threw down the church belfry. Towards the end of the eighteenth century it was removed for the purpose of gaining admission to the vault of the family of Ross of Kindeace, and during the operation it fell and was broken. It was afterwards bound in iron and re-erected in its present position. The top of the stone is triangular. On the one side of this upper compartment are two priestlike figures attired in long garments, and furnished each with a book. They incline forward as if intent on reading and devotion. Betwixt them is a small circular table, which may represent an altar; and above it there is the representation of a dove in the act of descending to carry away the sacrifice offered. It has a circular cake in its bill.

Under the table, two dogs of large size seem restrained by the priestly incantations of the human figures from executing their evil intentions. Under the triangular top and on the same side the surface contains the figure of a cross beset by serpents. The spaces above and below the arms are divided into rectangular compartments of mathematical exact ness. On the other side the centre is occupied by the figure of a man attired in long garments, caressing a fawn, and directly fronting him, there are the figures of a lamb and a harp. The appearance of the chalice and host between the kneeling figures at the top is very remarkable. None of the symbols occur on this stone.

Casts of this stone are to be seen in Edinburgh, London, Dublin, and in several Continental museums.

There are fragments of a stone in the churchyard of Tarbat which formed parts of a cross which stood in the centre of the churchyard. It was however knocked down long ago by the gravedigger and broken up for gravestones.

There is a sculptured sarcophagus in the churchyard of Kincardine. The statistical account says “In the churchyard there is a stone about five feet in length, and two in breadth and thickness; it is hollow and divided into two cells. The ends and one of the sides are covered with carved figures and hieroglyphics.”

In the churchyard of Edderton there is a stone on each side of which is a carved cross and below one of them is the figure of a man on horseback. In the compartment below this are two horses with their riders lined out. About a mile to the west of the Church at Edderton is an obelisk of rough unhewn whinstone which has a fish sculptured on the north side, and below that two concentric circles. There is a tradition that a bat-tle was fought in this place betwixt the inhabitants of the country and Norwegian pirates and that the leader of the invaders—Carius—was slain and interred here, and hence the name Carrieblair.

There is, or rather was, a complete chain of dunes or brochs surrounding the parish of Edderton but the most complete of them Dunalliscaig was completely destroyed about 1818 and the material of which it consisted was used for building dykes and farm houses in Easter Fearn. There is little doubt that many of these once existed in the district but were used up by utilitarian farmers or proprietors in the same way.

Investigators are now all but agreed that these carved stones could not have been the work of the Norsemen, as Hugh Miller contends. As most of them are found in the district once called Pictland, and scarcely anything like them in other parts where the Norsemen held sway, it is fair to assume that they were the work of these Picts. As to when they were erected evidence points to the eighth century as the most probable period.

Return to Book Index Page


This comment system requires you to be logged in through either a Disqus account or an account you already have with Google, Twitter, Facebook or Yahoo. In the event you don't have an account with any of these companies then you can create an account with Disqus. All comments are moderated so they won't display until the moderator has approved your comment.

comments powered by Disqus