MALCOLM Lord Fleming, in his
testament, executed in the spring of 1547, still further manifested his care
for the pjjW* erection of the Collegiate Church of Biggar. In that document
he says, 'I leif my vestments that were indued to the Kirk of Biggar and
Colledge of the samin, and all other profits, whilk belanga to themselves as
the erection of the Colledge bears, to the utility and profite of the samen,
ay and while the Kirk, Colledge,
Alemosineress, and
mansion-house be biggit; and putt in their own places as the erection of the
said Colledge bears, and ordines v° merks of my own propir guddis to be tane
to buy vestments, and bigging of the said Colledge, and mansions, chalices,
or ony other necessar things that is needful for the said Colledge.’ He
further orders, ‘ All my clayths to be dealt betwixt my twa sonis gotten
with my wife, and pairt of thaim to be given to the Colledge of Biggar, as
my executors and oversman thinks expedient, and leif to the Gray-friers of
Glasgow xx lib to pray for me, xx lib I leif to the ffour chaplains of the
Lenzie and Biggar to pray for me, and to be divided as my executors find
expedient.’
It is not unlikely that the
old Parish Church of St Nicholas at Biggar was used as the burial-place of
the Fleming family. In Catholic times a strong desire prevailed to deposit
the remains of the dead in consecrated ground, particularly in a place so
sacred and hallowed as the area of a church. Kings, nobles, priests, and
indeed all ranks, were anxious that their ashes should lie in a spot where
the exercises of religion were daily performed, where the constant presence
of holy men shed a solemnizing influence, where no rude hand dared to commit
violence, and where they would remain in calm and undisturbed repose till
the time when the sound of the archangel’s trumpet would animate them anew,
and summon them into the presence of their Creator and Judge. It is certain,
at least, that Malcolm Lord Fleming intended that his new church at Biggar
should be the burying-place of his family. In his testament, after leaving
his soul to Almighty God, the Virgin Mary, and all holy saints, he says, 4
Gif it happynis me to decess in weirs or ony uther deid, as God pless,
giffen my body be gottin quharever I decess, to be erdit in my Colledge Kirk
of Biggar.’ He also in the same document left orders that, immediately after
the completion of the College, his father's cymmeter ’ was to be carried
from the Castle of Boghall to that sacred edifice, whilk sail be bora the
xii day of October in the solemnest gate that can be devisit baith to the
honour of God.* In the chancel of the new Church, at the spot where the high
altar in former times stood, nearly all the members of the Fleming family
have been interred from the days of the founder to the end of last century.
The last person buried in it was Lady Clementina Fleming, who carried the
Biggar estates into the family of Elphinstone, and who died in 1790. The
banners and escutcheons of this noble family were wont to hang in ample fold
over the graves of the deceased barons, but these have all disappeared for
nearly a century. The only memorial of the dead interred below is a marble
slab, inserted into the wall, to the memory of Jane Mercer, wife of the
Honourable George Keith Elphinstone, who died in 1789. It is understood that
a large number of other persons besides the Flemings were* interred within
the walls of the Church. It is certain that when excavations were made in
the floor, some years ago, to introduce a heating apparatus, large
quantities of the remains of mortality were dug up.
The practice of kirk burial
was in popish times quite common throughout the whole country, and,
therefore, the Presbyterian clergy, at the Reformation, set themselves with
vigour to repress it, as it savoured, in their opinion, of Popery and
superstition. In the General Assembly which met at Edinburgh in 1588, they
passed an act against it; and in the General Assembly of 1643, they declared
that all former acts and constitutions made against burial in kirks were
again ratified, and that all persons, of whatsoever rank, were inhibited and
discharged to bury within the body of the kirk, where the people meet for
the hearing of the word and the administration of the sacraments, or to hang
pensiles or boards, to offer honours or arms, or to make any such like
monuments, to the honour or remembrance of any deceased person, upon walls
or other places within the kirk. These acts set the landed proprietors and
the Established clergy completely by the ears. The lairds, whose ancestors
from time immemorial had interred their dead within the walls of the parish
kirks, insisted on continuing the practice* maintaining that they had a
right so to do, both by prescriptive usage wad feudal superiority. The
clergy took their stand on the acts of the General Assembly, and resisted
with their usual warmth and obstinacy.
Some of the lairds in the
neighbouring parishes had sad bickerings with the clergy in regard to this
practice. They took forcible possession of the churches, and there interred
their dead, in spite of all the acts and anathemas of their spiritual
instxtoctors, though, as might be expected, they had very generally in the
end to submit to the fines and penances that were consequently imposed. We
will give one or two instances from the records of tbe Presbyteries of
Lanark and Biggar,
On the 22d of January 1624,
John Chancellor of .Shieldhill was summoned to appear before the Presbytery
of Lanark at its next meeting, and answer the charge of burying within the
Kirk of Quoth-quan. On the 17th of June following, it is reported that the
Laird hes promised to gif satisfactioune to ye Session of Quodquan, and to
find oawtione -to abstain from kirk burial in all tyme coming.’ The Laird,
however, after all, was resolved to take his own way; and when his wife
died, in 1639, he interred her forcibly in the Kirk of Quoth-quan. The
clergy, led on no doubt by his own pastor, George Bennet, pounced upon him
again, and summoned him to appear before them at Lanark, on the 28th of
March of that year. The record says, 'Ye Laird of Shielhill oompeiris and
acknowledges his fault in burying his wife in ye Kirk of Quodquan, and is
ordered to find cawtione to renounce his kirk buriell in tyme coming, under
ye pain of xl lib, and is ordeined to be censured by ye Kirk Sessione of
Quodquan, for breking up ye door of ye Kirk.’ John Muir, the Laird of
Anniston, was antaigned for committing a similar offence. The minutes of
Presbytery record as follows: ‘Qlk day, compeirit ye Laird of Anaston, and
confessit his fault, both in taking ye key of ye kirk doore of Sytningtoun
from ye minister thairof, and also burying his faither within ye samen, for
qlk faults he oblissis himself under ye pain of xl lib to satisfy the
Injunctiones of Presbytery to abstain from kirk buriell in all tyme coming
under the foresaid penaltie totia quoties be this act subscribed with his
hand at Lanark 25th of Junii 1625.' Twenty years after this date, viz., on
the 25th of February 1646, the next Laird of 4 Anieaton1 was summoned before
the Presbytery of Biggar, and accused of burying his father in the Kirk of
Symington. He oonfessed the fault as charged, but pretended that he was not
aware of the acts of the Church on the subject; that he was sorry for what
had taken place, and promised forbearance in time to come. The Presbytery
condemned him to make a public confession of his fault in the Kirk of
Symington the next Lord's day, and to bind himself under a penalty of a
hundred pounds, not to offend in like manner again. We will only cite
another instance. On the 10th December 1629, the Rev, Janies Baillie,
minister of Lamington, was enjoined by the Presbytery to take security from
Thomas Baillie, the Laird of Lamington, that he would be present at next
meeting of Presbytery, to receive his injunctions for his offence in
breaking up the door of Lamington Kirk, and burying his child within the
walls thereof; and if he refused, his pasta1 was to proceed against him by
public admonition. The Laird, however, appeared before the Presbytery on the
31st of the month referred to, and 4 was ordeyned to mak his pubhcki
repentance in sack olaith ane Sabbath day, and pay iiij lib in penalty.’
In May 1666, John, Earl of
Wigton, wa» interred in Biggar Kirk with -all due solemnity, just about the
time that the kirk sessions were battling with all their vigour against the
practice of Kirk burial. Anthony Murray, factor at Biggar to his Lordship,
enters in his books that he had (allowed to ye compter,1 that is, himself, ‘
ye sowme of ane hunder and two punds eighteen shillings and tuo pennies
Scots disbursed be him at Biggar at my Lord’s funeralL’ He also mentions
that he had given himself credit for the price of three bolls of meal, at
four pounds and half a merk per boll, which were consumed in my Lord’s house
at the burial in May; and that six firlots of the meal was at that time
given to the poor.
The Flemings, most likely
from being patrons of the parish, were not disturbed in their kirk buriaL No
account has been left of the ceremonials observed at the funeral of any
member of the family. These were, no doubt, very imposing, especially so
long as the family continued its adherence to the popish faith. A statement
of the funeral expenses of Lady Margaret Fleming, whose remains were
interred in Biggar Kirk in December 1675, is still preserved. It details the
expenses incurred before the body was brought to Biggar, and after it
arrived at that town. As this statement may be interesting to some readers,
we give a few of the items:—‘To Georg Stark going through ye Monkland wt
letters to ye buriall, L.1, 4s.‘for a dosen of great prinies to prin ye
mortcloath and horscloath, 2s.;’ ‘to ye footman Anderson to go to Carluik to
advertise ye peopell to have provision for man and horse, 8s.;’ ‘ for breid
and drink at ye dryburn qn ye corps halted, L.4, 6s.’ The cortege remained
during the night at Carluke, and the bill of the inn in which the men and
horses were chiefly accommodated has also been preserved. It is dated
at4Carluik, Dec. 22d 1675,’ and shows that the disbursements were for 8
gallons of ale, L.6, 8s.; for bread, L.2; for beef and mutton, L.3; for
brandy, L.4, 10s.; for pipes and tobacco, 6s.; for coals and candles, 10s.;
for eight pecks and three capful, most likely of com, L.5, 5s.; for straw
for seven horses, L.1, 8s.; for breakfast to the coachman and footmen, L.1,
7s.; for additional breakfast, L.1, 4s. 6d. The amount of the whole expenses
in the inn was L.25, 18s. 6cL Some other disburse* ments took place at
Carluke, such as L.4, 10s. ‘for sex horse and sex men that was not in yt
house,’ and 18s. ‘ given to ye bellman.’ A halt was next made at Camwath,
and the bill for refreshments at that town was L.4, 12s. 8d.
Among the items of expense at
(Bigair’ were ‘4 pund of candell, L.1; 4 pund of buter, L.1; ane pund and a
half of plumdames, 5s.; ane quarter a pund of ginger, 8s. 4cL; half a peck
of salt, 2s. 8d.; 4 hens, L.1, 10s.; two sheip, ane of ym L.5, and ane oyr
L.6; 4 dosen of pypes, 10s.; fyve loads of coall, L.1, 7s.; 2 cariag horse
to bring ye wyn and oyr necessaries out of Edinr., L.5; ane man for his hyr
and quarter yt was hyrd be Wm. bows to bring out ye links and torches, L.8,
16s.; James Rob for coming to Carluik wt ye torches, L.1; ye man that
brought ye mortcloath to Cumbemald, L.2; ye cotchman and his man at bigair
for horse stall and diat, L.4; a pynt of wyn and two gills of brandy and
glase to James Carmichael’s weif, L.2; Hew Anderson and his daughter besyd
ane firlot of meal, L.1, 6s.’
At the death of the founder
of the College Church, in 1547, the building, as we have already observed,
was unfinished. His son and successor, James Lord Fleming, carried on the
work; but, from some cause or other, he also failed to complete it, as well
as the hospital for the bedesmen, and the manses for the priests. On the 5th
of May 1555, he obtained a charter from the abbot and convent of Holyrood,
conferring on the College of Biggar the patronage and emoluments of the
Church of Dunrod, in the diocese of Whithorn, avowedly on the ground of the
scanty provision made for the provost and prebendaries of the College. This
charter has been preserved in the chartulary of ‘ the Monastery of Holyrood,
and is of considerable length. As everything of this kind possesses not
merely a local, but a general interest, we will give an abridged translation
of its principal points. It is addressed by Robert Stewart, commendator of
the Monastery of the Holycross, to the reverend father in Christ, Andrew, by
the grace of God Bishop of Candida Casa, and Dean of the Chapel Royal at
Stirling. It sets out by saying that all sincere endeavours to promote the
worship and honour of Almighty God, made' by the faithful, ought to be
extolled, approved of, and assisted by every person to the utmost extent of
his power. The abbot and monks of Holyrood had, therefore, fully appreciated
the singular affection, piety, and beneficence displayed towards God and the
holy Catholic Church by the late noble and potent Malcolm Lord Fleming, who
in these miserable and heretical (Lutheranis) times, and at his own expense,
had erected a magnificent church at the town of Biggar, in honour of
Almighty God and the Virgin Mary, and commonly called the College of 4 The
Blessed Mary of Biggar,’ in which a provost and a certain number of other
religious men had been appointed, established, and set apart to the service
of God and the blessed Virgin. James Lord Fleming, son and heir of the late
Malcolm Lord Fleming, had lately presented to the said abbot and monks a
petition, which showed that his Lordship, moved by pious zeal and devotion,
was striving to follow in the footsteps of his excellent father, and was
endeavouring not merely to uphold the College, but to improve it with most
watchful care. The petition also reminded them that they had in their hands
the right of patronage of the Church of Dunrod; and they felt that in these
evil times it was incumbent on them, so far as their ability extended, to
increase the means of religious worship, and render assistance to Lord
Fleming, so that he might not be deterred from pursuing his excellent
purpose and design, and feel too great inconvenience from the slender
endowment and scanty revenue of the numerous religious men officiating in
the College at Biggar. They had therefore resolved, in chapter assembled,
after mature consideration, and with the consent of the venerable John
Stevenson, prothonotary apostolic and precentor of the Metropolitan Church
of Glasgow, first provost of the College of Biggar, and present vicar of the
Parish Church of Dunrod, to give up all and whole the produce, rents,
rights, and emoluments belonging to the vicarage of Dunrod, so far as their
power extended, in order that they might be united, annexed, and
incorporated with the provostship of the said College. They provided,
however, that a vicar stipendiary should be appointed to discharge the
duties of the Parish Church of Dunrod, and should receive for stipend twenty
merks Scots annually, together with a house and garden, and an acre of
arable land. They conclude by calling on the bishop of the diocese to
approve and confirm the nomination of the paid vicar, and the annexation and
incorporation of the produce and rents of the vicarage and other things, as
already stated; to supply any omissions that they had made; and to accept
the signatures of their agents, acting in their name. To the charter is
appended the seal of the monastery, and the subscription of the abbot and
monks, and of John Stevenson, provost of the College of Biggar.
John Stevenson, or
Steinstoune, as he spelled his name, was the last Roman Catholic precentor
of the Metropolitan Church of Glasgow. He was the first provost of the
Collegiate Church of St Mary’s of Biggar, and held, besides, the office of a
Lord of Session. An interesting relic of this ecclesiastic, long preserved
by the late Principal Lee, is now in the possession of Adam Sim, Esq. This
is a copy of the historical fragments of the Babylonian priest Berosus,
which belonged to him, and which has his autograph both on the title-page
and on the last leaf. The following is the inscription on the last leaf:—
‘Spe expecto,
Sum ex libris magistri
Johannis Steinstoune, Metropolitane Glasguensis prjBcentoris, de Collegiat.
Ecclee. Be Marie de Bigger prsepositi—et Ami-corum, 1548.’
The glory of Biggar Kirk, as
a collegiate establishment, was shortlived. The provost, canons, singing
boys, and poor men, scarcely felt themselves warm and at ease in their new
possessions, when they were roused and perturbed by the thunders of Knox and
other leaders of the Scottish Reformation. The crusade against popish
idolatry burst forth with destructive fury in 1559. The monasteries and
other religious houses were attacked and demolished by the 4 rascal
multitude,’ and their revenues reverted to the Crown, or were seized by the
rapacious and turbulent nobles. How far the principles of the Reformation
had at that time made progress among the burgesses of Biggar, it is perhaps
impossible now to say. The powerful influence exerted over them by Lord
Fleming, in virtue of his feudal rights and prerogatives, would no doubt
prevent them from laying violent hands on the new ecclesiastical edifice of
Biggar Kirk, had they been so disposed. The monuments of idolatry connected
with its walls were, at any rate, few. The heads of two or three saints, the
emblems of a dove, or even of a serpent, were not calculated greatly to
rouse the destructive propensities of the Reformers, who may have sprung up
within the bounds of the burgh and barony. Some of the most offensive may
have been defaced in the manner in which they are now to be seen. The altars
would be overturned, the sacred furniture and utensils would be carried off,
the priests would cease to perform their masses, the organ and the singing
boys would become silent, and the poor bedesmen would no longer sit at the
graves of the founder and his relatives, and pray for the safety of their
souls.
A great difficulty was felt
in supplying the places of the Romish priests. A sufficient number of
regularly ordained Protestant clergymen was not to be found. It was,
therefore, laid down in the 4First Book of Discipline/ that ‘ To the
churches where no ministers can be had presentlie, must be appointed the
most apt men, that distinctlie can read the common prayers and the
Scriptures, to exercise both themselves and the Church till they grow to
greater perfection, and in process of time he that is but a reader may
attain to a further degree, and by the consent of the Church and discreet
ministers, may be permitted to minister the sacraments,’ etc. The names of
bishop and archbishop were distasteful to the Presbyterian Reformers, and
therefore they appointed persons whom they called superintendents, who were
employed in visiting the churches in a district assigned them, and preaching
the word from parish to parish. Under this arrangement, William Millar was
reader at Biggar in 1567, and William Hamilton in 1571, with a salary each
of L.20. It is not unlikely that these two officials had been prebendaries
in the collegiate establishment of Biggar, as it is known that this class
was largely employed at the period as readers and exhorters. In 1574 a new
ecclesiastical arrangement, carried into effect by the Earl of Morton, then
Regent of the kingdom, provided that several parishes should be placed under
the pastoral superintendence of one minister, while the readers were still
to continue to discharge their duties in each parish.
During the existence of this
plan, Ninian Hall was appointed mini-ster of Biggar, Lamington, Hartside,
Coulter, Kilbucho, and Symington, with a salary of L.114, 13s. 4<L The
readers in these parishes, and their salaries, were as follows, viz.: at
Biggar, David Makkie, L.20; at Lamington and Hartside, John Lindsay, L.22,
4s. 5^cL; at Coulter, William Millar, L.16; at Kilbucho, Andrew Jardine,
L.16; and at Symington, John Lindsay, L.16. In 1576 Walter Haldane was
minister of Biggar, with a stipend of L.112, and the kirk land of Biggar;
and the reader was John Pettilloch, with the former salary of L.20. Walter
Haldane had also the oversight of the parishes of Coulter, Lamington, and
Symington. He appears in the end to have committed some misdemeanor; for in
May 1588 he was deposed, as unworthy to fill his sacred office. The readers
and exhorters were debarred from celebrating marriages or administering the
sacraments, but it appears that in many instances they overstepped the
bounds prescribed to them. We find, for instance, in the records of the
Presbytery of Glasgow, that James Waugh, reader at Quothquan, was accused of
celebrating irregular marriages; and was, besides, a drunkard, a fighter, a
wanton, and inconstant. It was therefore declared by the General Assembly,
in 1580, that ‘thair office is no ordinar office within ye Kirk of God;1 and
in the year following it was enacted that this office should be finally
abolished, that the churches should be arranged into a number of
presbyteries, and that none but a regularly ordained clergyman should be
permitted to discharge the duties connected with public worship.
Although the ecclesiastical
system of Scotland was changed at the Reformation, it yet seems that, for a
considerable period afterwards, some of the clerical staff of Biggar College
was kept up, at least in name. William Fleming, a son of John Fleming of
Carwood, was presented to the office of provost, and the parsonage and
vicarage of the Collegiate Church of Biggar, by John Lord Fleming, on . the
1st of January 1573. This person, or perhaps another of the same name as he,
is styled a servant of Lord Maitland of Thirlestane, obtained a tack of the
teinds of the parsonage and vicarage, in 1590, from commissioners appointed
by John Lord Fleming to sell or wadset such of his teinds and benefices as
they should see fit, during his absence from this country. William Fleming,
who obtained this tack, procured a decreet from the Lords of Session, on the
26th November 1593, against the feuars, farmers, parishioners, tenant?,
tacksmen, rentallers, and others indebted in payment of the teinds, fruits,
rents, and emoluments of the provostrie of the College of Biggar, and the
parsonage and vicarage of 'Thankerton, united and annexed to the said
provostrie, commanding them to make payment, under the penalty of having
diligence executed against them, and being committed to ward in Dumbarton
Castle. A gift of the provostship, with its fruits, rents, emoluments, and
casualties, was conferred by John, Earl of Wigton, on Patrick Fleming of
Ballach, on the 81st of March 1661. John, Earl of Wigton, patron of the
College Kirk and prebendaries thereof, with consent of William Fleming, the
provost, on the 14th of May 1616, granted a disposition in favour of James
Duncan of the pre-bendship that was endowed with the teinds of Auchynreoch,
and the two acres of land lying in the town and territory of Kirkintulloch.
Whether these persons officiated as the parish ministers of Biggar, we have
not been able to ascertain.
As we formerly stated, the
parish of Thankerton was joined to the Collegiate Kirk of Biggar previous to
the Reformation. It was this circumstance that led the Commissioners for the
Plantation of Churches, on the 5th of December 1617, to unite and annex the
Church and Parish of Thankerton to the Church and Parish of Biggar, and to
decern that the Earl of Wigton, patron of these churches, and tacksman of
their teinds, should provide and maintain a passage-boat on the Clyde, for
the accommodation of the parishioners of Thankerton, when they attended
divine service at the Kirk of Biggar. The people of Thankerton by and by
became averse to repair to the Kirk of Biggar, and they rebelled in the same
way as the people of Libberton afterwards rebelled in regard to the Kirk of
Quothquan. On the 13th of May 1630, the minister of Biggar lodged a
complaint with the Presbytery of Lanark, that the parishioners of Thankerton
refused to attend the Kirk of Biggar, on the ground that it was inconvenient
to travel so far to the examinations, by which they were prepared for
participation in the sacrament of the Supper. The parishioners were
therefore summoned before the Presbytery, to show the grounds of their
refusal On the 27th of the same month they appeared by commissioners before
the Presbytery, and positively asserted that they would not attend divine
service at Biggar; ‘quhair-fore ye breether ordaine ye censures of ye kirk
to proceed against thame for contumacie.’ On the 10th of June following,
they, again appeared, and informed the Presbytery that they had held an
interview with the Earl of Wigton, and that he had promised with all
possible diligence to meet with the Presbytery in order to concert some
method, 4 how ye Kirk of Thankerton may be served.’ The Presbytery therefore
thought it advisable to proceed no further with the infliction of spiritual
censures on the people of Thankerton. The dispute, however, was not so soon
settled. We find that in the spring of 1635, the Archbishop of Glasgow wrote
a letter to the Presbytery of Lanark, ordering George Ogstoun, minister of
Covington, to signify to the parishioners of Thankerton that they should
repair to the Kirk of Biggar, in accordance with the decision of the
Commissioners' for the Plantation of Churches. The Presbytery, however,
brought the subject before the Synod; and the result in the end was, that
Thankerton was joined to the parish of Covington.
Thomas Campbell was minister,
or what was called parson and vicar of Biggar, about the beginning of the
seventeenth century. On the 13th February 1607, he granted a tack of the
teinds of Biggar, during his lifetime, to John, Earl of Wigton, for the
payment of four chalders of oatmeal, between (Youl and Candlemas,’ and
relieving his Lordship of the communion elements and all stents and
taxation. In 1644, when the Presbytery of Biggar was formed, a Thomas
Campbell was still minister of Biggar; but whether this was the same
individual who granted the tack to the Earl, it is very difficult to say. At
that time Mr Campbell was an old man, incapable of discharging the duties of
his office. The pulpit of Biggar was therefore, for several years, supplied
by members of the Presbytery. Many applications were made to the Earl of
Wigton to issue a presentation in favour of some acceptable minister, but
nothing was done till Qptober 1646, when a letter was laid before the
Presbytery of Biggar from his Lordship, ‘whairin he did nominat Mr Alexander
Livingston, now minister at Carmichael, for ye Kirk of Biggar;’ and a
‘supplicatione’ from the parishioners was at the same time presented,
calling on the Presbytery to take all necessary steps to forward so
desirable a settlement. The Presbytery therefore lost no time in prosecuting
the matter before the Presbytery of Lanark; and this Presbytery having
obtained a decision favourable to the translation from the Commission of the
General Assembly, and being satisfied that Mr Livingstone was inclined to
accept the presentation, they agreed to transport the said Alexander
Livingstone to the Kirk and Parish of Biggar. Mr Livingstone was most
acceptable both to the Presbytery and the people of Biggar. He was an
eloquent and effective preacher. On the 27th of January 1647, he preached a
popular sermon, from Eph. iv. 11, 12, before the Presbytery, preparatory to
his settlement, which gave the members so great satisfaction, that they put
on record that they praised God for the gifts and graces which He had
bestowed on their intended colleague. The following extract from the report
of his induction, on the 3d of February 1647, can hardly fail to be read at
the present day with interest by the parishioners of Biggar:—‘And haveing
seriouslie exhorted ye whole people of that congregatione, especiallie ye
present elderis of ye same, that in regaird they had been so long destitute
of a pastor, and now that they had received one soe hopefull to doe good
among theme, and one whome they had so eamestlie socht for, that they wold
testifie yr thankfullnes to God for him, and that they wold reverence and
obeye him as yr pastor in all things in the Lord. Thairafler the said
ministeris, elderis, deacones, and parochiners respective, in signe of yr
consent, did tak the said Mr Alexander Livingstone be ye hand, and gave to
him most heartilie ye richt hand of fellowschip.’ Mr Livingstone, as is well
known, demitted his charge in 1662, rather than comply with the new
ecclesiastical arrangements then established by law. His future history is
shrouded in obscurity.
No record exists, so far as
we know, that describes the ecclesiastical condition of the parish of Biggar
during the persecution, from 1662 to 1688. It appears to have been favoured
with the ministrations of one or two successive curates; and there is
evidence to show that some hot contentions took place in consequence of the
withdrawal of the parishioners from the Parish Kirk, and their attendance on
conventicles.
The first curate at Biggar,
of whom we know anything, is Richard Brown. His name appears repeatedly in
the books of the Earl of Wigton, as having received his stipend, which
appears to have been paid partly in money and partly in victual. For
instance, it is recorded that there was allowed ‘Richard Brown, minister at
Bigyar, the soume of fourscore pund qlk completes his silver stippand cropt
1674.’ The following order regarding the payment of his victual stipend,
from William, Earl of Wigton, to Bailie James Law of Biggar, is still
preserved:—* James Law, at sight heirof, pay to Mr Richard Broune, our
minister at Bigger, twelve bolls victuall, tow pairt meal and third pairt
beir, faill not heirin, as ye will be answerable to us; and this, with his
receipt, shall be your sufficient warrand. Given under our hand at Bigger
Januar sixten, jaj vi seventie-fyve (1675) years.
Mr Brown’s receipt is written
on the same sheet; and whatever may have been his merits in other respects,
we can say at least that he was a good penman. At what time Mr Brown was
settled we have not discovered, but we have found references to a kirk
session at Biggar in 1666. He was most likely settled by that time, and,
though an Episcopalian, appears to have had a kirk session. At that time,
and for many years subsequently, the Earls of Wigton paid L.60 Scots, as
interest, or, as it is called, annual rent, on a sum of L.1000 to the kirk
session of Biggar. The next Biggar curate whose name has been preserved is
John Reid, who was translated from Walston to Biggar in the end of the year
1685.
After the Revolution, William
Jacque appears to have been for some time minister of Biggar. He was
succeeded in 1697 by Robert Livingstone, who was translated from Libberton.
Mr Livingstone died in 1733. A Mr Jack was appointed his assistant and
successor in 1732; and he continued to officiate here till the 27th April
1749, when he was translated to Carnwath.
The curators of the heirs of
John, Earl of Wigton, viz., William, Earl of Panmure, and William Fleming of
Barrochan, in 1751, issued a presentation to the Kirk of Biggar in favour of
Mr William Haig. The call to this gentleman was supported by Lady Clementina
Fleming, and her husband, Mr Elphinston, by Mr Chancellor of Shield-hill,
Sussana Lockhart, widow of Mr Dickson of Hartree, by Robert Forsyth, Robert
Hamilton, and his sister Margaret Cooper. But, on the other hand, it was
opposed by Lady Persilands, Mr Brown of Edmonstone,—James Telfer, Laurence
Boe, James Bertram, John Gladstanes, James Smith, and James Melrose, all
resident heritors except James Melrose; by four of the elders, twenty-five
feuars of the town of Biggar, and one hundred and twenty-five householders.
The Presbytery, in these circumstances, decided that they could not proceed
to the settlement of the presentee, and resolved to apply to the patrons to
be relieved from any further trouble in the matter; but Gideon Lockhart,
writer, Lanark, as agent for the presentee, protested and appealed to the
Synod of Lothian and Tweeddale. The case, accordingly, came before the
Synod, and afterwards before the Gene ral Assembly. The deliverance of the
Assembly was, that ‘in present circumstances it is not expedient to appoint
the settlement of the presentee, and do remit to the Presbytery of Biggar,
to deal with all concerned, in order to bring about a comfortable settlement
of the parish.’
As the parishioners, almost
unanimously, still persevered in their opposition to the settlement, the
Presbytery found that they could proceed no further in the case; and
therefore another appeal was made to the higher ecclesiastical courts. The
Commission of the General Assembly appointed a committee to deal with
objections. The following objections were laid by the elders before the
committee:—‘1st. He began on a high enough key, but he was not able to hold
out the whole length of the service. 2d. That he was so unwieldy and infirm,
that they had no prospect of his being able to perform the duties of his
office by visiting his parishioners, particularly the sick.’ The whole
people intimated that they adhered to these objections. The committee
thereupon exhorted them to be cautious what they said, as every statement
made would go to proof; and reminded them that further opposition on their
part would have the effect of keeping the Church longer vacant The answer of
the parishioners was, that they were determined to persevere in the course
on which they had entered, as in their opinion the settlement of Mr Haig
would be no better than a vacancy. The consequence of this decided
opposition was, that Mr Haig was induced to write a letter to the Presbytery
from Edinburgh, on the 8th of June 1754, resigning any right which he might
have acquired to the incumbency of Biggar.
On the 27th of June, Bailie
Carmichael appeared before the Presbytery, and laid on the table a
presentation to the Kirk of Biggar in favour of Mr John Johnston, minister
of the Gospel in the Castle of Edinburgh. John Gladstanes, one of the
elders, at the same time presented a petition, signed by all the elders, the
resident heritors, and a large number of the heads of families, craving that
the Presbytery would proceed to the settlement of Mr Johnston with all
convenient speed. Mr Johnston was consequently inducted to the charge of
Biggar on the 26th September 1754. Mr Johnston died on the 15th of October
1778. The next incumbent of the parish of Biggar was Mr Robert Pearson, who,
as elsewhere related, was violently obtruded in 1780. Mr Pearson dying in
1787, Mr William Watson was admitted to the charge on the 23d October 1787.
This divine died in 1822, and was succeeded in 1823 by the present
incumbent, the Rev. John Christison, A.M.
The Flemings, from an early
period, were patrons of the Parish Church, and also of an hospital dedicated
to St Leonard. No account of this latter institution can now be obtained,
and the very spot on which it stood is not known. It is supposed that the
lands belonging to it were those of Spittal on Candy Bum, and that it was
from this circumstance that they acquired their name ; Spittal being a
corruption of the Latin word hospitium—a house of entertainment. We know
that Malcolm Lord Fleming, who founded the College Kirk of Biggar, bestowed
the church lands of Spittal on this establishment for the endowment of one
of the prebendaries, who was to be called Canon of the Hospital of St
Leonards. The charter chest of the Wigton family contains many documents
which refer to the patronage both of the Church and the Hospital. There is,
for instance, a precept of Sasine, granted by James H., for infefting Robert
Lord Fleming in the lands of Biggar, and the patronage of the Church and
Hospital, which bears date 31st May 1446. This was relative to a charter
proceeding upon the personal resignation of David Lord Hay of Tester. A
claim, it would seem, was made by Lord Hay to these patronages, and a
lawsuit was the consequence. Commissioners appointed to settle the dispute
held a meeting at Glasgow on the 31st of July 1469, and gave forth a decreet,
by which they declared that the patronage belonged to Robert Lord Fleming,
as the true, loyal, and only lawful and undoubted patron of the Church of
Biggar. Reference is also made to Lord Fleming’s right of patronage to the
Church and Hospital of Biggar in documents dated 1470 and 1472. The
patronage of Biggar Kirk has remained with the Fleming family and their
descendants ever since, and at present (1862) is the property of Lady
Hawarden, the daughter of the late Admira^ Fleming.
The stipend of the Parish
Church of Biggar, which, in 1821, was fixed at seventeen chalders, half
oatmeal and half barley, was two years ago augmented to nineteen. The sum
derivable from this source is stated to be L.307, 3s. 0½d. per annum. An
allowance of L.8, 6s. 8d. is also given for communion elements; and the
glebe, extending to ten acres, is said to let at L.4, 4s. per acre. The free
teind in the parish is still upwards of L.200. |