Without the least
intimation that the influence of Rev. Clement Read, as a minister of the
gospel, was derived from any source but the grace of God, and the divine
blessing on individual efforts, a short statement of family connexions
will be given, on the authority of his-son, embracing facts full of
instruction for the philosophic observer of the progression of the human
race, and evidences of the fulfilment of the promises of the gospel.
Colonel Clement Read, the
grandfather of the preacher, was born in Virginia, in the year 1707, and
was early bereft of his father. John Robinson, of Spottsylvania, became
his guardian. This gentleman was appointed Trustee of William and Mary
College, in 1729. He was President of the Council, and, on the departure
of Governor Gooch for England, in 1749, became governor, and in a few
days- died. The education of young Read was superintended by Mr.
Robinson, and completed at William and Mary College, Commissary Blair
being president. In the year 1730, Mr. Read was married to Mary, the
only daughter of William Hill, an officer in the British Navy, the
second son of the Marquis of Lansdowne.
This gentleman had been
united in marriage to the only daughter of Governor Jennings, and took
up his residence in that part of the Isle of Wight, one of the eight
counties into which the province was divided, which was made a
constituent part of the county of Brunswick in 1720. Soon after his
marriage, Mr. Read went with Colonel Richard Randolph and Colonel
Nicholas Edmonds on an exploring expedition, to locate land in that part
of the county now known as Charlotte. Colonel Edmonds returned without
purchasing ; Mr. Read and Colonel Randolph purchased largely; Randolph
on the Staunton, and Mr. Read about ten thousand acres, on the waters of
Ash Camp, Dunivant, and Little Roanoke. Mr. Read removed to his
purchase, and made his residence at Bushy Forest, about four miles south
of the present village of Maryville. When the county of Lunenburg was
set off, in 1746, its area extended from the line of the present
Brunswick to the Blue Ridge, and from James’ River to North Carolina.
The early settlements of Presbyterians south of James’ River, were in
Lunenburg; and, by a subsequent division in Amelia; Colonel Clement Read
became clerk of the county, and served seventeen years, keeping the
office at his own house. He frequently served in the General Assembly of
the State, and with men who become leaders in the Revolution. He was
present when John Robinson, of King and Queen, moved the vote of thanks
which so disconcerted Colonel Washington. He died January 2d, 1768, and
was buried at Bushy Forest. His wife was laid by his side, November
11th, 1780, in her sixty-ninth year. She was a pious woman, and
exemplary member of the Episcopal Church; their children, Isaac, Thomas,
Clement, Margaret and Edmund.
Colonel Isaac Read, the
father of the minister, resided at Bushy Forest. He married a daughter
of Henry Embra, a representative of the county with Colonel Clement
Read. He had three children, Clement, Priscilla, and Isaac. With his
brother-in-law, Paul Carrington, he represented the county, and was
associated with Washington, Jefferson, and Henry, in their patriotic
movements. He received from Congress, in 1776, a commission as colonel
of a Virginia regiment. He immediately joined the army. In less than a
year, he fell a victim to disease; and was with military honors laid in
a vault, in Philadelphia, in the thirty-seventh year of his age. The
family preserve a correspondence between him and General Washington.
4 Clement Read, the
minister, was but six years old at the time of. his father’s death. His
mother, in a few years, married Colonel Thomas Scott, who superintended
the education of the children. Hampden Sidney College was chartered by
the State in 1783: an academy had been in operation, under the direction
of Presbytery, about eight years. Upon entering college, young Read
could look over the trustees, and name Thomas Scott, his step-father ;
Paul Carrington, who had entered his grandfather’s office when a youth,
and had married his Aunt Margaret; Thomas Read, the County Clerk, his
uncle; William Cabel, who had married his cousin, a daughter of Paul
Carrington; Nathaniel Venable, bad also married a cousin, a daughter of
Paul Carrington. Two of his uncles, Thomas and Clement, had married each
a sister of Judge Nash, a trustee; and President Smith had also married
a sister of the Judge; and it may be mentioned, the mother of Nash
Legrand, whose name is in the church, was also sister of Judge Nash.
This Mr. Legrand, for his second wife, was married to Mrs. Paulina Read,
widow of Colonel Edmund Read, a name mentioned with much kindness by Dr.
Alexander, in his auto-biography. Mrs. Paulina Legrand, the widow of
Colonel Edmund Read and Rev. Nash Legrand, was a firm friend of the
College and the Union Theological Seminary, and the patroness of many
young men, in preparation for the ministry. One of these, an associate
of Clement Read in college, was Rev. William Hill, D. D.
The genealogy for the
eighteenth century, of the Morton, Watkins, Venable, Allen, Womark,
Smith, Spencer, Michaux, Wilson and Scott families, and many others that
occupied Lunenburg, in its original boundaries, would offer to the
philosophic observer of the human race subjects for profound reflection.
Coming from different divisions of the European stock, mingling in
society on the frontiers, amalgamating by marriage, moulded by the
religious teachings of Robinson and Davies, and their associates and
successors, they formed a state of society and morals, in which the
excellences of the original constituent parts have all been preserved.
The courtly manners of Williamsburg, the cheerfulness and ease of the
Huguenots, the honest frankness and stern independence of the English
country gentleman, the activity and shrewdness of the merchant, the
simplicity of republican life — all have been combined. Removed from
cities, and not densely crowded in neighborhoods, relieved from the
drudgeries of common life, and stimulated to activity, to preserve a
cheerful independence, the increasing population have improved the
opportunities for moral, intellectual, and spiritual advancement, and
pious examples, of excellence in manners, morals and religion, and
domestic intercourse, worthy of remembrance and imitation. In the
deficiency of these records, the main line of the Carrington family is
all that can be presented.
A certain Paul Carrington
and his wife, of the Heningham family, emigrated from Ireland to
Barbadoes, and settled in Bridgetown. He died early in the eighteenth
century, leaving a widow and a numerous family of young children. The
youngest child, George, about the year 1727, came to Virginia with the
family of Joseph Mayo, a Barbadoes merchant. Mr. Mayo purchased and
occupied the ancient seat of Powhatan, near the falls of the James.
Young Carrington lived some years with Mr. Mayo as his storekeeper.
About 1732, he, in his twenty-first year, married Anne, the eldest
daughter of William Mayo, brother of Joseph, who had settled in
Goochland, she being in her twentieth year. They went to reside on
Willis’ Creek, now in the bounds of Cumberland County. They had eleven
children: 1st. Paul, born March 5th, 1733, and died June 22d, 1818; 2d.
"William, November 17th, 1735, died an infant; 3d. George, March 15th,
1737, died October 9tli, 1784; 4th. William, December 22d, 1739, died
August 20th, 1757; 5th. Joseph, February 6th, 1741, died April 4th,
1802; 6th. Nathaniel, February 8th, 1743, died November, 1803 ; 7th.
Heningham, December 4th, 1746, (married a Bernard,) died January 24th,
1810; 8th. Edward, February 11th, 1748, died October 28th, 1810; 9th.
Hannah, March 28th, 1757, (married a Cabel,) mother of Judge William H.
Cabel, died August 27th, 1817 ; 10th. Mayo, April 1st, 1753, died
December 28th, 1805; 11th. Mary, January 9th, 1759, (married a Watkins,)
died —. George Carrington and his wife, Anne, both died in February,
1785. From them sprung the numerous families of the Carringtons, in
Virginia; and, in the female line, the descendants have been numerous.
Their eldest child, Paul, was married to Margaret Read, daughter of
Colonel Clement Read, of Lunenburg, now Charlotte, October 1st, 1755.
Their children were — Mary, George, Anne, Clement, and Paul. Mrs.
Carrington died May 1st, 1766, and left a memory of great virtues. Her
youngest child, Paul, became Judge of the General Court of Virginia, and
died January 18th, 1816.' Mr. Carrington was married the second time, in
his fifty-eighth year, March 6th, 1792, to Miss Priscilla Sims. Their
children were — Henry, (two died in infancy,) Letitia, Martha, and
Robert. The services of Mr. Carrington in the Board of the College, and
during the Revolutionary war, were becoming an honorable and high-minded
man.
Clement Read, the
minister, completed his course of study at Hampden Sidney College. As a
resident graduate, he was present during the great awakening commencing
in 1786, and united with Allen, and Hill, and Blythe, in the
prayer-meeting pregnant with blessings. He had been carefully nurtured
in good morals, polite intercourse, and the principles of Christian
religion. His grandmother was remarkable for her efforts to maintain
religion in her family. She had been nurtured in the Episcopal church by
Commissary Blair ; and was a devout mother seeking the salvation of her
household according to the direction of the church of her fathers. The
Prayer-book and Bible were read in her family in morning and evening
worship : and when necessary she officiated herself. Young Read grew up
under religious influence in the Presbyterian form. From the time Davies
preached at the house of Littlejoe Morton, and was blessed in numbering
him and his wife as converts to Christ, and members of that part of the
church of which he was minister, the Presbyterian form and creed
prevailed extensively in Charlotte. The colonies of Presbyterians
settled in Cub Creek and Buffalo, and the blessings on the labors of Mr.
Henry and his successors, had made large congregations of Presbyterian
worshippers in Lunenburg, from the present Brunswick to the Blue Ridge.
Many of Mr. Read’s relations became members of the Presbyterian Church,
and he grew up under its instructions. He professed his faith about the
same time t^at Hill and Allen made their profession. He at once devoted
himself to the ministry of the gospel.
At a meeting of the
Hanover Presbytery at Cumberland Meeting-House, Oct. 10th, 1788, Clement
Read and Nash Legrand were received as candidates for the ministry. At a
meeting at Buffalo, January 1789, the preparatory trials of Read and
Legrand proceeded, and Cary Allen was taken as candidate. In the
succeeding April, Legrand was licensed. In Bedford, Oct. 1789,
Presbytery suspended any further preparatory steps for the licensure of
Mr. Read. He had become interested with the Methodists, who were
numerous in some neighborhoods, and their ministers very active and
acceptable. They were yet considered as part of the Episcopal church,
from which no separation had actually taken place, although the
particular forms by which that church is characterized, were coming into
notice. In finally separating from the Episcopal church a large body in
Old Lunenburg formed a denomination called Republican Methodists, of
which Mr. Read was for years a minister. He associated with these, and
began preaching before he had finished his preparatory course under
Presbytery. In this state of the case Presbytery, without passing any
censure, suspended further attention to his case. In July, 1790, at
Buffalo, Mr. Head had an interview with Presbytery particularly to
exculpate himself from the charge of slandering President Smith, in
saying that the President used his official influence to lead young men
to the Presbyterian Church and ministry. Of this Mr. Smith complained:
and of this charge Mr. Read desired to clear himself; and did satisfy
Presbytery, that he was not guilty of impeaching the character of Mr.
Smith. As Mr. Read was at that time connected with the Methodists, his
name was removed from the list of candidates under the care of
Presbytery. Mr. Read was ordained by the Republican Methodists, and was
an aimable, devout, and earnest preacher, respected and beloved by all
that loved the gospel.
In March, 1789, Mr. Read
was married to Clarissa, daughter of Col. Thomas Edmunds, of Brunswick.
She was his companion through life, and bore him thirteen children, six
of whom were sons. These claim some mixture of Indian blood in their
veins, derived through their mother from Pocahontas, of world-wide fame.
The descent is thus. Pocahontas left an only child, Thomas Rolfe; he
left an only daughter, who became the wife of Robert Bolling; she left
one son, John Bolling; he had a number of daughters; one of them married
Richard Randolph, the ancestor of the orator,^ John Randolph, of
Roanoke, another Mr. Thomas Eldridge. Colonel Edmunds married a daughter
of Mrs. Eldridge, and Mr. Read a daughter of Mrs. Edmunds. So that Mrs.
Read’s great-grandfather, John Bolling, was great-grandchild of the
Princess Pocahontas. Hundreds of families may now claim descent from
John Lolling, and some mixture of blood of Pocahontas. Mrs. Read was
born in December, 1772, and died in June, 1845.
In the first year of the
nineteenth century an effort was made to promote unity of feeling and
action among Christians in* the bounds of ancient Lunenburg, and the
account given of it by the Rev. Drury Lacy is probably all the record
that remains. Under date of January 22d, 1802, Mount Ararat, Prince
Edward County, Virginia, he says: — “On Christmas day about ten Baptist
preachers, an equal number of Methodists, and six Presbyterian
ministers, met at Bedford Court-House, in this State. The object of this
meeting was to discourse freely together on the subject of our
differences, and to see if we could not adopt some terms for living more
friendly than we have done, and even to commune together. I have not a
minute of the proceedings, but will relate the substance of what we did,
as well as I can, from memory. It was mutually agreed that the ministers
of the different denominations should exercise all good offices towards
each other, and preach in each other’s pulpits as occasion might serve,
where it would not interfere with a previous appointment; and that it
should be esteemed unfriendly for the minister of one denomination to
refuse the use of his pulpit to the minister of another, unless when the
congregation was opposed. It was further agreed that the members of the
respective societies might commune with the churches of the other
denominations, where they found a freedom to do so; and that such should
not be called to an account by the respective societies to which they
belonged, as if guilty of any breach of regularity. That the members of
different denominations should watch over each other in brotherly love;
and in cases where offences should be committed, by a member of one
communion, known to a member of another, which required the discipline
of the church, that the society to which the offender belonged should be
informed, and the party aggrieved be admitted to state the particulars
of the offence. That the minister of one denomination should receive the
members of another to communion, upon their producing a certificate of
their good standing in their own society, or upon receiving satisfaction
of the same in any other method. That if a member of one denomination
wished to become a member of another, the latter should not receive him,
unless he produced a certificate that he was free from censure in the
society to which he formerly belonged. It was further agreed, that each
Presbytery among us would admit two Baptists and two Methodists to sit
with us as correspondents ; that each association of the Baptists would
admit two Presbyterian and two Methodist ministers ; and that each
Conference of the Methodists would admit two Presbyterian and two
Baptist ministers as correspondents, upon such producing certificates of
their appointment, properly attested. It was finally resolved to submit
our proceedings to the consideration of the Presbyteries, Associations
and Conferences to which we belonged.”
Under date of May 17th,
1802, he writes — “You have already been informed of a meeting which
took place last Christmas at Bedford Court-House. Since that time,
greater harmony and brotherly love have been apparent among the
different denominations. They frequently preach together, and seem much
stirred up to promote the common cause of religion, and the interests of
the Redeemer’s kingdom. But as the proposed plan of union has not yet
been discussed by the respective church judicatories, to which it was
referred, it is impossible to say what will be the result of that
business. However, whether that be adopted or rejected, I am happy to
inform you that the attention to religion which was excited at that
meeting has continued to increase. It has spread upwards of twenty
miles; and there have been pleasing prospects in more distant places,
whenever the ministers have found an opportunity to preach from home.”
Upon mature reflection it became evident to all, that external union
could, at that time, be more closely cemented only by amalgamation. The
Baptists were not prepared to throw off their peculiarities ; and it
became a question with the Republican Methodists whether they would
retain their separate organization or unite with one of the other
denominations ; and if a union was to be attempted, to which
denomination should the proposition be made. At a meeting of the
Presbytery at Hampden Sidney, April, 1804, Rev. Messrs. John Robinson
and Clement Read appeared as a committee of the Republican Methodists to
confer with the Presbytery “ on the subject of an union, which it
appeared their constituents anxiously desired to form with the
Presbyterian Church.” A committee of conference was appointed,
consisting of Messrs. Lacy, Alexander, and Lyle, with power “ to adopt
such measures respecting the union contemplated, as to them may appear
eligible, and to make their report to Presbytery at their next meeting.”
In September, at Cub Creek, immediately after the ordination of J. H.
Rice, the committee made report of having had a conference with a
committee of the Republican Methodist Church, “but that committee,
wishing for an opportunity to confer with their church upon some
important points relative to the subject, before a decision was made,
the business was postponed until they should have an opportunity of
conversing with, and consulting their people. But since that time no
communication had been received from the Republican Methodist Church on
the subject.” No further communications passed. In 1809 a called meeting
of Presbytery was held on the 28th and 29th days of September, at
Briery, to consider the application of Rev. Clement Read to be received
as a member of Presbytery. After a full and free conference, and
consideration of the testimonials of his ordination, and of his
character and standing with his brethren, and Mr. Read “having adopted
the constitution of our church,” the Presbytery received him as a
member, and gave him the right hand of fellowship. In 1822, the Rev.
Messrs. Henderson Lee, John Davidson, Samuel Armstead, and Matthew W.
Jackson, ministers of the Republican Methodist Church, met the
Presbytery at Charlotte Court House, and, “having adopted the Confession
of Faith of the Presbyterian Church, and answered the questions put to
candidates,* were received and took their seats as members of
Presbytery.” By this act the Republican Methodist Church, as a body, in
that part of Virginia, became extinct.
Mr. Read lived in harmony
with the Presbytery, and continued to labor earnestly in the ministry
while his physical powers endured. His adoption of the Confession of
Faith was ex animo. He had always been a Predestinarian in creed. The
reasons for his desiring a union with the Presbytery appear to have been
his conviction of the importance of union among the people of God, and
of the sufficiency of the Church as organized by the Apostles as the
agent to accomplish the renovation of the human race. Through life he
was opposed to any measure or system of things that appeared to him
either to usurp the duties of the Church, or to stand between her and
the performance of her proper work in the salvation of men. When the
question arose between voluntary associations or the Church as
organized, as the instrument of benevolent and Christian operations, he
unhesitatingly chose the latter. In the early stages of the temperance
movement, to the surprise of many, he raised his voice against some
procedures, protesting they were unscriptural and inadmissible. He would
agree to no principles or measures he judged unbecoming his office, and
the great principle that the Church was sufficient for moral and
religious enterprises.
Possessed of an ample
estate, and far removed from a penurious spirit, he lived in great
simplicity and abundance; and maintained to the last his simplicity of
manners, frankness of expression, tenderness of feeling, and open
hospitality, and singleness of mind. He was remarkable for that
simplicity in all his principles and actions, that implied freedom from
guile and envy. Dr. Hill, in his old age, being asked his opinion of Mr.
Read, said he was the most simple-minded man he ever knew, the most
child-like. “Did you esteem him pious?” One of the most devout men in
the world. Let a man go and visit him, and he would come away deeply
impressed with the sincerity and depth of his. piety.” |