The enterprise and
bravery of the pioneers of Washington County, Virginia, gave birth to
events of romantic interest in politics, religion and war. Ex-Governor
Campbell, near Abingdon, thus writes:
Montpalm, Nov. 12th,
1351.
Dear Sir:—I failed to
take my intended journey to Tennessee, and will now endeavor to answer
some of your inquiries, in your letter of the Tth of October. The first
emigration to the Holston Valley, was about the year 1T65 — In that year
John Campbell explored the country, and purchased land for his father
David Camp^ bell and himself. The first settlers were from Augusta,
Frederick, and the other counties along the Valley of Virginia — from
the upper counties of Maryland and from Pennsylvania, were mostly
descendants from Irish stock, and were generally Presbyterians, where
they had any religious opinions — a very large proportion were religious
and many were members of the Church. There were however some families,
and among the most wealthy, that were wild and dissipated in their
habits. I send you enclosed by the same mail that carries this letter, a
copy of the call to the Rev. Charles Cummings, signed by one hundred and
thirty-eight heads of families. In my early life I knew personally, many
of those whose names are signed to it — and I knew nearly all of them
from character. They were a most respectable body of men; were all whigs
in the revolution, and nearly all — probably every one of them,
performed military service against the Indians—and a large portion of
them against the British, in the battles of King’s Mountain, Guilford
court-house, and other actions in North and South Carolina. The Campbell
family, from which I am descended, were originally from the Highlands of
Scotland, and emigrated to Ireland about the latter end of the reign of
Queen Elizabeth. John Campbell, my great-grandfather, with a family of
ten or twelve, children, came to America in 1726, and settled in
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. He had six sons —three of whom, Patrick,
Robert and David, emigrated with him from Pennsylvania, to what was then
Orange, but afterwards Augusta County, about the year 1730. Patrick was
the oldest child and grandfather of General William Campbell of the
Revolution. David was the youngest, and was my grandfather. He married
in Augusta County, Mary Hamilton, and had seven sons — John, Arthur,
James, William, David, Robert and Patrick. All except William, who died
when a young man, emigrated to Holston; John, Robert and Arthur before
their father, the other three with him. The other sons of John Campbell
had families, and their descendants are scattered over many of the
States of the West. William B. Campbell, a young man and lately elected
Governor of Tennessee, is my nephew, and is the grandson of Margaret
Campbell, one of the daughters of my grandfather, David Campbell. The
Edmiston, or Edmondson family, that came to Holston, was a very large
and respectable one, numbering some ten or fifteen families. They were
zealous whigs, and William the oldest brother was Major in the regiment
from this county, that behaved so gallantly in-the battle of King’s
Mountain. Two of his brothers, Captain Andrew Edmiston and Lieut. Robert
Edmiston, and a cousin Captain William . Edmiston, were killed in that
battle. The Vance, Newell and Blackburn connection was very large and
respectable. The Rev. Gideon Blackburn once of Tennessee, and one of the
most distinguished pulpit orators of his time, was of the same Blackburn
stock. Col. Samuel Newell, son of Samuel Newell who signs the call, was
a distinguished officer in the battle of King’s Mountain and a man of
fine talents. He died in Kentucky. The Buchanan family was a numerous
one, all worthy people. There were four brothers of the Davises and
three of the Craigs, all very worthy men — also several brothers of the
Lowreys and Montgomerys, equally worthy. William Christian was from near
where Fincastle now stands — was a man of fine intellect, and
distinguished in western warfare. Benjamin Logan was the same man who
went to Kentucky, and became a distinguished man there. There are on the
list many others whose families have done well in the western country. I
will omit at present going into more detail, and indeed I do not know
that I can give you any information further that would deserve your
notice. I have not .given you any particular account of my immediate
ancestors, supposing it would not be suitable from me.
Most respectfully, your
obedient servant,
David Campbell.
A call from the united
congregations of Ebbing and Sinking Spring, on Holston’s rive. Fincastle
County, to be presented to the Rev. Charles Cummings, minister of the
gospel, at the Rev. Presbytery of Hanover, when sitting at the Tinkling
Spring:
Worthy and dear Sir—We
being in very destitute circumstances for want of the ordinances of
Christ’s house statedly administered amongst us ; many of us under very
distressing spiritual languishments; and multitudes perishing in our
sins for want of the bread of life broken among us ; our Sabbaths too
much profaned, or at least wasted in melancholy silence at home, our
hearts and hands discouraged, and our spirits broken with our mournful
condition, so that human language cannot sufficiently paint. Having had
the happiness, by the good Providence of God, of enjoying part of your
labors to our abundant satisfaction, and being universally well
satisfied by our experience of your ministerial abilities, piety,
literature, prudence and peculiar agreeableness of your qualifications
to us in particular as a gospel minister—we do, worthy and dear sir,
from our very hearts, and with the most cordial -affection and unanimity
agree to call, invite and entreat you to undertake the office of a
pastor among us, and the care and charge of our precious souls—and upon
your accepting of this our call, we do promise that we will receive' the
word of God from your mouth, attend on your ministry, instruction and
reproofs, in public arid private, and submit to the discipline which
Christ has appointed in his church, administered by you while regulated
by the word of God and agreeable to our confession of faith and
directory. And that you may give yourself wholly up to the important
work of the ministry, we hereby promise to pay unto you annually the sum
of ninety pounds from the time of your accepting this our call ; and
that we shall behave ourselves towards you with all that dutiful respect
and affection that becomes a people towards their minister, using all
means within our power to render your life comfortable and happy. We
entreat you, worthy and dear sir, to have compassion upon us in this
remote part of the world, and accept this our call and invitation to the
pastoral charge of our precious and immortal souls, and we shall hold
ourselves bound to pray.
Montcalm, Nov. 29, 1851.
Dear Sir—I had the
pleasure of receiving by the last mail your letter of the 18th inst.—and
on further consideration have concluded to comply with your views. I do
not know that what I have written will be worthy of notice, and I am not
in sufficient health to revise. You must make what you can of it.
Tours most respectfully,
David Campbell.
The Campbells of Holston.
John Campbell, the great
ancestor of the Campbells of Holston, came from 'Ireland to America,
with a family of five grown sons and several daughters in the year 1726,
and first settled in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. About the year
1730, he removed to what was then Orange, afterwards Augusta County,
where he resided until his death; and where his numerous descendants
lived for many years. The Campbells above named were the descendants of
his oldest son Patrick, and his youngest son David—Patrick had a son
Charles, and he a son William, who was the General William Campbell, of
the Revolution, and the grand-father of Mrs. Gov. M’Dowell. David, the
youngest son of John, married Mary Hamilton, and had a family oi
thirteen children, seven sons and six daughters, the youngest of whom
was eleven years old when the family removed to Holston—John Campbell,
the elder, and all his descendants, were raised and educated after the
strictest manner in the Presbyterian church, and a large portion of them
became members in that church. In 1765, John, the oldest son of David
Campbell and Mary Hamilton, in company with Dr. Thomas Walker, explored
the western wilderness, and purchased for his father and himself an
ancient survey near the head-waters of the Holston, called the Royal Oak
— and a few years afterwards the family removed to it. John and Arthur,
the two oldest sons, preceded their father, and accompanied by one
sister, Margaret, and making improvements. The father and mother then
followed, accompanied by their sons James, David, Robert, and
Patrick—and daughters Mary who was then married to William Lochart, and
Martha, Sarah and Ann, single. In a few years after this removal
Margaret, who had been a pioneer with her two oldest brothers, married
David Campbell, the pioneer who erected Campbell’s station fifteen miles
below Knoxville, Tennessee. James lost his eye-sight with the small-pox,
and died at 50 years of age—John, Arthur, David, Robert and Patrick,
were active men and rendered some service to their country. John
Campbell, the oldest son of David, was born in 1741, and received a good
English and mathematical education. He was raised a farmer, inured to
hard labor from boyhood, and accustomed to Indian warfare. He came to
Holston when twenty-five or six years of age:—and shared in nearly all
the campaigns against the Indians until the close of the revolution. He
>was a Lieutenant in Wm. Campbell’s company in Col. Christian’s regiment
against the Shawnees in 1774. He commanded a company, and was second in
command in the battle of the Long Island flats, of Holston, in July
1776, where his company sustained the centre charge of the Indian chief
Dragon-canoe, made with such boldness that the Indians for a few
minutes, were actually intermixed with his men—and where the victory
over the Indians was most decisive. He also commanded a company in
October of that year, under Col. Wm. Christian against the Cherokee
towns, and up to the year 1781, he was in almost constant service. In
1778, he was appointed clerk of Washington County, which office he held
until 1824, being forty-six years. His great fondness for farming and a
rural life induced him many years before his death to place his office
under the charge of a deputy and to remove to a farm. Here for more than
thirty years he enjoyed himself in tranquillity, surrounded by his wife
and children, and receiving and entertaining educated strangers, or old
acquaintances who often called upon him. Such visits were most frequent
from young Presbyterian preachers who were then often passing through
the country. I recollect two, John and James Bowman, from North
Carolina, of whom he was very fond as worthy good men and agreeable
companions. They often called on him. He died in December, 1825, in the
85th year of his age. Arthur, the next brother, was a talented and
distinguished man ; and a very good sketch of him may be found in How’s
History and Antiquities of Virginia, under the head of Washington
County. In the sketch there are one or two small errors. He died in his
69th year—and he came first to Holston with his brother John.
David, the fourth brother
of those who came to Holston, was educated for the bar, and practised
law a few years in Washington County after it was established. He then
married, and removed to what afterwards became the State of
Tennessee—was first Federal Judge in the Territory, and when the State
was formed he was made one of the Judges of their Supreme Court, and
held the office for many years. A year or two before his death, which
took place in 1812, he was appointed Federal Judge in the Territory,
which afterwards formed the State of Alabama, but died of fever, before
he removed his family to the country, in the 62d year of his age.
Robert, the next brother,
came to Holston in 1771—when nineteen years of age, he made his first
military campaign, as a volunteer against the Shawanee Indians in 1774,
as is supposed, in the company of Capt. Wm. Campbell. In the summer of
1776, he again volunteered, joined Capt. John Campbell’s company, and
acted with distinguished bravery and presence of mind in the battle of
the Island Flats. He was also in Christian’s campaign in October,
1776—and in 1780, he was an ensign under Col. Campbell at the battle of
King’s Mountain, and distinguished himself in that battle. In December
of the same year, he performed another campaign against the Cherokee
Indians, under Col. Arthur Campbell. His education was not equal to that
of his older brothers, nor^vas his capacity—but he was a brave, active,
and patriotic whig, and a man of much energy through life. He acted as a
magistrate in Washington County for upwards of thirty years, and until
he removed to the vicinity of Knoxville, Tennessee, where he died in
1831, in the 77th year of his age.
Patrick, the youngest
brother, performed less military service than the others, and had less
capacity. He was a volunteer in the battle of King’s Mountain, and
performed his duty well. He remained with his father on the farm and
inherited it after his death—married—had a large family of children—and
in his old age removed to Williamson County, Tennessee, where he died in
about the 80th year of his age. He was a good man through life, with
indolent habits and very little energy of character.
Such is a brief sketch of
the five brothers, sons of David Campbell, and grand-sons of John
Campbell, who emigrated from Ireland.
I have named General Wm.
Campbell. His father, Charles Campbell, died in Augusta County—and he
removed to Holston with his mother and sisters. The oldest, Elizabeth,
married John Taylor, from whom Judge / lien Taylor, of Botetourt, and
the Taylors of Montgomery County, descended. The second daughter, Jane,
married Thomas Tate. The third daughter, Margaret, married Colonel
Arthur Campbell — and the youngest, Ann, married Richard Poston. All had
families — and are very respectable.
I intended, before
closing the sketch of David Campbell’s family, to have spoken more
particularly of his two daughters, Margaret and Ann—as they were both
remarkable women, and were both most exemplary Christians and members of
the Presbyterian church through life.
Margaret, when a girl of
eighteen, accompanied, as I have before stated, her brothers John and
Arthur to Holston, and managed their household affairs for two or three
years without a murmur, and without, in that time, seeing a single
female friend. In two or three years after the removal of her father and
mother, she married David Campbell, and in 1781, removed to the country,
afterwards forming the State of Tennessee, and in 1784, to the place
where her enterprising husband erected first a block-house, and
afterwards Campbell's Station. She was a most intelligent, mild, and
placid woman; always thoughtful, and always calm and prepared for every
emergency. So conspicuous were these traits in her character, whenever
any difficulty occurred, or any alarm took place, she was first looked
to and consulted, not only by the women in the block-house and Station,
but even by the men.
To show this trait, I
will relate one instance. On one occasion, when the frontier was quiet
and the men had left the block-house, her husband and a hired man were
in the field ploughing among the corn, the Indians fired upon them, but
doing no damage, they unloosed their horses and made their way to the
house. She heard the guns, and suspecting it was from the Indians,
collected her little flock of children around her in the house—chained
the door—took down a rifle well loaded, and taking her seat calmly
awaited the event, expecting every moment to hear the Indians
approaching, or the men from the field, if not killed or wounded. In
this situation she remained until they arrived. As soon as night came
on, they , saddled horses, took up the family, and quietly retreated to
White’s Fort, fifteen miles into the settlements.
This excellent lady died,
with cancer in the breast, in 1799, at the age of fifty-one, universally
beloved and regretted, and lies buried in the Presbyterian Church
burying ground near Campbell’s Station. What I have written is
communicated by Mrs. Campbell, her youngest daughter, and who was one of
the children in the block-house.
Ann the youngest daughter
married Archibald Roane, a young lawyer who came from Pennsylvania, and
commenced the practice of his profession in the territory afterwards
Tennessee. He was, I always understood, a descendant of the Rev. Mr.
Roane of Lancaster County, who taught in the Neshaminy Academy after
Tennant left it. He first came to Liberty Hall in Rockbridge, I think,
and then went to Tennessee. He was a man of fine talents and most
exemplary in every respect, and was one of the first Judges elected to
the Supreme Court, after the State was formed. In 1801 he was elected
Governor of the State — served one term of two years, and was again made
a judge, which office he held until his death in 1814. His widow soon
after followed to the grave four as promising children as were ever
raised in any country, two sons and two daughters — all grown and
carried off with consumption — all this she bore with humble Christian
fortitude, and ended her own life in the house of her eldest son Dr.
James Roane at Nashville, in 1831, in the 71st year of her age.
The other branches of the
family of John Campbell the ancestor, removed from Augusta County, very
early in the settlement of the western country — some to Kentucky and
some to West Tennessee. Patrick, a younger brother of Charles, and uncle
of Gen. William Campbell, went to the south of Kentucky, and has left
numerous and most respectable descendants.
I will enclose you, in a
few days, an account of the battle of King’s Mountain, prepared from the
official report of Cols. Campbell, Shelby and Cleveland, and from the
testimony of eye-witnesses. A silly jealousy on the part of some of the
officers who partook in that victory and of their friends, has induced a
perversion of some of the facts, so that the public has never yet seen
an entirely correct account. You must accept the foregoing, my health
not permitting me to labor very much. .
Yours most respectfully,
David Campbell.
Rev. Charles Cummings.
Until his residence in
Lancaster County, Virginia, little is known of the early life of the
Rev. Charles Cummings, the first minister of the gospel on the Holston.
An Irishman by birth, he in early manhood emigrated to America. Whether
his classical education was completed before, or after, he left Ireland
is uncertain; the time of his emigration is equally unknown. He resided
for a length of time in the congregation of the noted James Waddell, D.
D., in Lancaster County, Virginia. The Carters, Gordons and others in
that congregation were in the habit of employing, as teachers, young
gentlemen, of classical education, from the mother country. A number of
these became ministers in the Presbyterian Church. Mr. Cummings appeared
before Hanover Presbytery at the Stone Meeting House in Augusta, May 3d,
1765. The records say, “the Presbytery intend to encourage Mr. Cummings
and appoint him a discourse on the words—Be not desirous of vain glory —
to be delivered at discretion; and that he stand extempore trials.” This
“discretion” was granted probably on account of the distance he must
travel to meet the Presbytery. In November 1765, he met the Presbytery
at Providence, Louisa County. On the 7th, the records say, at the house
of Mr. Todd, Mr. Charles Cummings delivered a discourse from Galatians
5. 26, according to appointment, and an exegesis on this question — Num
justificamus sola fide — which the Presbytery sustains as part of
trials: And having examined him on his religious experience, in the
Latin and Greek languages, Rhetoric, Logic, Geography, Philosophy, and
Astronomy, they sustain his answers to the several questions proposed on
these subjects, and appoint him a sermon on Rom. 7th, 9th, and a Lecture
on the 23d Psalm, 1st — 4th, to be delivered at our next, as popular
trials.” Mr. Samuel Leak at the same time underwent similar examinations
and had similar popular trials assigned him.
At Tinkling Spring
meeting house, April 17th, 1766, Mr. Cummings delivered a sermon on Rom.
7. 9, and Mr. Leak one on Acts 13. 26, according to appointment, which
were sustained as parts of trial. Mr. Leak also delivered a lecture on
John 3. 1 — 8, and Mr. Cummings one on Psa. 23. 1 — 5, which were also
sustained. These two candidates were examined on some points in
divinity; and gave satisfactory answers to the questions proposed
therein. On the next day the candidates were licensed, and directed, “to
spend their time till our next, in the vacancies in Augusta, Albemarle
and Amherst.” At Cub Creek Oct. 15th, 1766, three calls were put in for
Mr. Cummings. One from Porks of James, now Lexington and Monmouth, one
from D. S. in Albemarle, and one from Major Brown’s meeting house in
Augusta. This last he accepted; “and Messrs. Black, Craig, Brown and
Rice, with as many other members as can attend, are appointed a
Presbytery to meet at Major Brown’s meeting house, the first Wednesday
of March next, to receive the trials of Mr. Cummings — viz. a sermon “
on Rom. 10. 4, and a lecture on the 3d Epistle of John throughout, as
preparatory to ordination; and if they see fit, to ordain and instal
him; at which Mr. Craig is appointed to preside.” The ordination did not
take place, only one of the committee named, Mr. Black, attending at the
appointed time and place. By order of Presbytery, the ordination took
place on May 14th, 1767, the Rev. Messrs. Sankey, Craig, Brown and Rice,
with Elders George Moffat, Alexander Walker and John M’Farland being
present, Mr. Craig presiding. In April 1772, he applied for a dismission
from that Church, on account of its inability to support him. “Both
parties avowing that as the only reason for dissolution of the
relations.” The Presbytery granted the request, and then recommended to
Mr. Cummings to take a tour through the vacancies, and commended him to
the brethren of Orange Presbytery, should he travel in their bounds. He
also was recommended by the Presbytery at its fall session, Oct. 1772,
at D. S., to supply eight Sabbaths on Green Briar and in Tygart’s
Valley. At Brown’s meeting house June 2d 1773, a call was presented to
Presbytery by Samuel Edmonson, a candidate, from the congregations of
Ebbing Spring and Sinking Spring on Holston, for the services of Mr.
Cummings, which he accepted. There is no word made of any installation
services being appointed or performed. The call was prepared to be
presented at the sessions of Presbytery held at Tinkling Spring, in the
preceding April, but the presentation was delayed until the intermediate
meeting in June.
While residing in the
Northern Neck, he was united in marriage with Miss Milly Carter,
daughter of John Carter of Lancaster County. Being in the congregation
of Dr. Waddell, it is probable that he pursued his theological studies
under his care. In his early ministry he became possessed of a valuable
library; and appears to have been devoted to his work as a minister of
the gospel. His call from the Holston, was signed by one hundred and
twenty heads of families, all respectable men, many of whom afterwards
became distinguished; a fact as remarkable as true.
The following sketch is
from the pen of the ex-Governor of Virginia, David Campbell. Having
accepted the call, he removed with his family, purchased land in the
neighborhood of where Abingdon now stands, and settled upon it. His
first meeting house at Sinking Spring, was a very large cabin of unhewn
logs, from eighty to a hundred feet long, by about forty wide; and it
stood about the middle of the present grave yard. It was there for some
years after the second meeting house was built, and had a very
remarkable appearance. Mr. Cummings was of middle stature, about five
feet ten inches high, well set and formed, possessing great personal
firmness and dignity of character. His voice was strong and had great
compass; his articulation was clear and distinct. Without apparent
effort he could speak to be heard by ten thousand people. His mind was
good without any brilliancy. He understood his own system well; spoke
always with great gravity, and required it from all who sat under the
sound of his voice. He could not tolerate any movement among the
congregation after preaching commenced. He uniformly spoke like one
having authority, and laid down the law and the gospel with great
distinctness as he understood them. When he came to Holston, he was
about forty years of age.
At this time the Indians
were very troublesome, and continued to be so for several years; and
generally during the summer months, the families for safety were obliged
to collect together in forts. The one to which he always carried his
family was on the land of Capt. Joseph Black, and stood on the first
knoll on the Knob road, south of Abington, and on the spot where David
Campbell’s gate stands. In the month of July, 1776, when his family were
in the fort, and he with a servant and wagon and three neighbors were
going to his farm, the party were attacked by Indians, a few hundred
yards from the meeting-house. Creswell, who was driving the wagon, was
killed at the first fire of the Indians, and during the skirmish the two
other neighbors were wounded. Mr. Cummings and his servant-man Job, both
of whom were well armed, drove the Indians from their ambush, and with
the aid of some men from the fort, who hearing the fire, came to their
relief, brought in the dead and wounded. A statement has been published
in a respectable historical work, that on this occasion Mr. Cummings
lost his wig. I speak from the information of an eye-witness when Mr.
Cummings came into the fort, in saying that the story has no truth in
it.
From the time Mr.
Cummings commenced preaching at Sinking Spring, up to about the year
1776, the men never went to church without being armed, and taking their
families with them. On Sabbath morning, during this period, it was Mr.
Cummings’ custom, for he was always a very neat man in his dress, to
dress himself, then put on his shot-pouch, shoulder his rifle, mount his
dun stallion, and ride off to church. There he met his gallant and
intelligent congregation, each man with his rifle in his hand. When
seated in the meeting-house, they presented altogether a most solemn and
singular spectacle. Mr. Cummings’ uniform habit, before entering the
house, was to take a short walk alone whilst the congregation were
seating themselves; he would then return, at the door hold a few words
of conversation wdth some one of the elders of the church, then would
walk gravely through this crowd, mount the steps of the pulpit, deposit
his rifle in a corner near him, lay off his shot-pouch, and commence the
solemn worship of the day. He would preach two sermons, having a short
interval between them, and go home. The congregation was very large, and
preaching was always well attended. On sacramental occasions, which were
generally about twice a year, the table was spread in the grove near the
church. He preached for many years, and until far advanced in life, to
one of the largest, most respectable, and most intelligent congregations
ever assembled in Western Virginia. His congregation at Ebbing Spring
was equally respectable and intelligent, but not so large. It included
the families at the Royal Oak, and for twenty miles in that direction.
The meeting-house was built in the same manner as that at Sinking
Spring, but not so large.
Mr. Cummings was a
zealous whig, and contributed much to kindle the patriotic fire which
blazed forth so brilliantly among the people of Holston in the war of
the Revolution. He was the first named on the list of the Committee of
Safety for Fincastle County, And after the formation of Washington
County, 1T76, he was chairman of the Committee of Safety for that
County, and took an active part in all its measures. Mr. Cummings died
in March, 1812, in about the eightieth year of his age, leaving many and
most respectable descendants. He was a sincere and exemplary Christian,
and a John Knox in his energy and zeal in support of his own church. He
never lost sight of his object, and always marched directly up to it
with a full front. He performed a great deal of missionary labor through
an extensive district of country, beyond his own large field. The fruits
still remain. He was a Presbyterian of the old stamp, rigid in his
Calvinistic and Presbyterian faith, strict in the observance of the
Sabbath, and faithful in teaching his children and servants the
Catechism. In the expedition against the Cherokees, in 1776, Mr.
Cummings accompanied the forces from the Holston, and preached at the
different stations now included in the State of Tennessee ; and in this
way he was the first minister of the gospel in that State.
Mr. Cummings had some
trouble on the subject of Psalmody. That fruitful subject of debate,
which should be sung in public worship, the version of Rouse or of
Watts, interested his people; and caused the first and only disturbance
in his large charge. He was in favor of using Watts. At a meeting of the
Presbytery of Hanover, in Bedford County, October, 1781, a complaint
from some members of both congregations of his charge, Sinking Spring
and ~ Ebbing Spring, came under consideration. It was resolved that the
malcontents on that subject be dismissed from his pastoral care, when
all arrearages were paid up. And as different congregations "were in
trouble on this subject; Presbytery—“Recommend to all their members that
much care be taken to preserve the peace and harmony of particular
churches, in their attempts of this nature (introducing Watts’ version);
and especially that they take particular pains to inform the minds of
the people as fully as possible upon the subject, and that they gain the
approbation of the elders, and of the people of the particular church
where such Psalmody is desirable, before it be prosecuted to a decided
practice. Still, however, reserving to each member the right of
conscience in particular cases as prudence shall direct.” The uneasiness
in his charge not being settled by this act of Presbytery, Mr. Cummings
asked the next year, at Timber Ridge, May 23d, to be released from tlie
pastoral charge of the two congregations. As a peace measure, it was
granted. Mr. Adam Rankin, licensed in the fall of 1782, visited the
Holston, and became the earnest defender of the exclusive use of Rouse’s
version in the worship of the sanctuary. In a few years he became the
leader of a schism of the church on the subject of Psalmody. The history
of that schism occupies many pages in Davidson’s History of the
Presbyterian Church in Kentucky. In a little time the controversy died
away on the Holston; and Mr. •Cummings continued to preach the gospel
with spirit while his strength lasted. In the congregation on the
Holston, both versions were used by compromise. In May, 1784, in reply
to the petition from some members of the Sinking Spring and the Knobs
congregation-—Presbytery “ give it as their opinion, that there will be
no danger in attending upon the word preached by Mr. Cummings, or any
other regular member of our Presbytery; and reeommend it to them to lay
aside prejudice and party spirit, so that they may hear him, and other
supplies that may be sent them to their spiritual advantage.” In many
congregations in Virginia, the singing was performed on the Sabbath, and
other public occasions, from both versions, by agreement; the Psalms and
Hymns for a certain part of the day were from Rouse, and the other part
from Watts.
At Falls Meeting House,
May 22d, 1783, this minute was made: “The western members of this
Presbytery requested our concurrence in soliciting Synod to constitute
them into a distinct Presbytery, it being so exceedingly inconvenient
for them to attend Presbytery at such a distance. Presbytery concur
accordingly, provided they can procure another member. At the same
meeting of Presbytery, on May 21st, Mr. David Rice was dismissed from
his congregation in Bedford County, and accepted a call from Kentucky.
In May, 1785, a request was made to Synod by Messrs. Hezekiah Balch,
Charles Cummings and Samuel Doak, that a Presbytery to be called
Abingdon, be formed, embracing the territories of the present States of
Tennessee and Kentucky. By act of Synod this was formed. In the
arrangement of Synods and Presbyteries to constitute a General Assembly,
the Presbytery of Abingdon was divided to form two Presbyteries—Messrs.
Cummings, Balch, Casson, Doak and Houston to be the Presbytery of
Abingdon,, and be a constituent part of Synod of the Carolinas; and
Messrs. Rice, Craighead, Rankin, McClure and Crawford to be the
Presbytery of Transylvania, and form part of the Synod of Virginia. By
this arrangement Mr. Cummings ceased to be connected with a Virginia
Presbytery, and continued a member of Synod of Carolinas until the year
1802, when the Presbytery was transferred to the Synod of Virginia,
having parted with the greater portion of her original area to form
other Presbyteries.
Montcalm, Dec. 1, 1851.
Dear Sir—I concluded this morning to copy for you an account of the
battle of King’s Mountain, but before commencing took down your volume
of Sketches of North Carolina, and read over Gen. Graham’s account of
it—and I confess I have read it with a good deal of surprise. There are
one or two small errors in the general account, but it is substantially
correct. But when the troops are about to go into action, the Washington
regiment from Virginia is lost sight of, and although it is admitted in
the account that Col. William Campbell was selected to command ifi
chief, he is lost si^ht of too, and Col. Shelby is made the conspicuous
commanding officer. Even he and Sevier are made to receive the
surrender. Now, as to this last point, I can state to you that Col.
David Campbell, of Campbell’s Station, Tennessee, a man whose character
for truth and integrity stands as high as any man who was in the battle,
furnished a statement in his life-time of what he was an eye-witness—and
in that statement he declares that he was within a few steps of the
British officer, Capt. De Poisture, when he surrendered, and that the
surrender was made to Col. Campbell. This would not be a very material
matter, in the confusion of a surrender, were it not that there has been
an effort on the part of Governor Shelby and his friends to depreciate
the conduct of Col. Campbell in that battle, and to enhance his own.
This is a piece of
history- with which I have made myself long since well acquainted, but I
am not willing to engage in any particular investigation about it. I
will, however, send you a copy of the official report of the action,
made and signed by William Campbell, Isaac Shelby and Benjamin
Cleveland, in which you will see it stated that Campbell’s regiment, as
well as Shelby’s, began the attack—and the truth is, these two regiments
began it, because, from their positions, they were nearest the enemy.
A statement of the
proceedings of the western army, from the 25th day of September, 1780;
to the reduction of Major Ferguson and the army under his command. On
receiving intelligence that Major Ferguson had advanced up as high as
Gilbertown, in Rutherford County, and threatened to cross the mountains
to the western waters, Col. Campbell, with 400 men from Washington
County of Virginia, Col. Isaac Shelby, with 240 men from Sullivan
County, North Carolina, and Lieut. Col. John Sevier, with 240 men from
Washington County, North Carolinia, assembled at Watauga, on the 25th of
September, where they were joined by Col. Charles McDowell, with 160 men
from the counties of Burke and Rutherford, who had fled before the enemy
to the western waters. We began our march on the 26th, and on the 30th
we were joined by Col. Cleveland on the Catawba river, with 350 men from
the counties of Wilkes and Surry. No one officer having properly a right
to command in chief, on the first day of October we despatched an
express to Major General Gates, informing him of our situation, and
requested him to send a general officer to take the command of the
whole. In the meantime
Col. Campbell was chosen
to act as commandant till such general officer should arrive. We marched
to the Cowpens, on Broad river, in South Carolina, where we were joined
by Col. James Williams, with 400 men, on the evening of the 6th of
October, who informed us that the enemy lay encamped somewhere near the
Cherokee ford of Broad river, about 80 miles distant from us. By a
council of the principal officers, it-was then thought advisable to
pursue the enemy that night with 900 of the best horsemen, and leave the
weak horse and foot-men to follow as fast as possible. We began our
march with 900 of the best horsemen about 8 o’clock the same evening,
and marching all night, came up with the enemy about 3 o’clock, P. M.,
of the 7th, who lay encamped on the top of King’s Mountain, twelve miles
north of the Cherokee ford, in the confidence that they would not be
forced from so advantageous a post. Previous to the attack, on the
march, the following disposition was made: Col. Shelby’s regiment formed
a column in the centre on the left; Col. Campbell’s regiment another on
the right; part of Col. Cleveland’s regiment, headed in front by Major
Winston, and Col. Sevier’s regiment formed a large column on the right
wing; the other part of Col. Cleveland’s regiment, headed by Col.
Cleveland himself, and Col. Williams’ regiment, composed the left wing.
In this order we advanced, and got within a quarter of a mile of the
enemy before we were discovered. Col. Shelby’s and Col. Campbell’s
regiments began the attack, and kept up a fire while the right and left
wings were advancing to surround them, which was done in about five
minutes; the greatest part of which time a heavy and incessant fire was
kept up on both sides ; our men in some parts, where the regulars
fought, were obliged to give way a small distance, two or three times,
but rallied, and returned with additional ardor to the attack. The
troops upon the right having gained the summit of the eminence, obliged
the enemy to retreat along the top of the ridge, to where, Col.
Cleveland commanded, and were there stopped by his brave men. A flag was
immediately hoisted by Captain De Poisture, their commanding officer,
(Major Ferguson having been killed a little before,) for a surrender.
Our fire immediately ceased, and the enemy laid down their arms, the
greatest part of them charged, and surrendered themselves to us
prisoners at discretion.
It appeared from their
own provision returns for that day, found in their camp, that their
whole force consisted of 1125 men, out of which they sustained the
following loss : Of the regulars, one major, one captain, two sergeants,
and fifteen privates killed; thirty-five privates wounded, left on the
ground not able to march. Two captains, four lieutenants, three ensigns,
one surgeon, five sergeants, three corporals, one drummer and 49
privates taken prisoners. Loss of the Tories : two colonels, three
captains and 201 privates killed; one major and 127 privates wounded,
and left on the ground, not able to march; one colonel, 12 captains, 11
lieutenants, two ensigns, one quartermaster, one adjutant, two
commissaries, 18 sergeants and 600 privates taken prisoners. Total loss
of the enemy, 1105 men, at King's Mountain. Given under our hands at
Camp.
Signed Wm. Campbell,
Isaac Shelby,
Benj. Cleveland.
The despatch, a copy of
which I here send you, can be found in the Virginia Gazette of the 18th
of Nov., 1780. The copy I send was taken from an original, sent to Col.
Arthur Campbell, as county Lieutenant of Washington County.—See 1st vol.
Marshall’s Life of Washington, p. 397.
If I can think of any
other facts worth communicating to you, and which relate to the first
settlement of this part of Virginia, you shall have them — and I shall
be greatly obliged by hearing from you as you progress with your work.
Your Sketches of North Carolina have greatly interested me — and all you
may say about Parson Graham and Liberty Hall must be interesting. When a
boy, I often saw at my father’s, John Campbell’s, such young preachers
as Allen, who died in Kentucky — Freeman, Blythe and others — all very
interesting men. But they have all gone, I believe. I was married by the
second husband of Allen’s widow—and knew her intimately. She was a most
interesting woman — and Mr. Ramsey was the pastor of the congregation
around Campbell’s station, and the intimate friend of Col. Campbell’s
and Judge Roane’s families. He preached the funeral service at the
burial of Mrs. Margaret Campbell. I believe he died before Judge Roane.
Most respectfully your
obt. servt.,
David Campbell.
I will omit the account
of the battle of King’s Mountain which I had intended sending you. The
official account is sufficient. There is, however, one fact which I
ought to state in justice to the Virginia regiment, and which shows the
part they took in the battle. Col. Newell, in a letter in 1823, informs
me that of our men in that battle 30 were killed and 60 wounded. He was
badly wounded himself—but fought through the action by procuring a
horse, although a lieutenant, and commanding and encouraging his men
until the surrender. Of those killed, 13 were from the Washington
Virginia regiment, and here are their names: — Captains Andrew Edmondson
and William Edmondson; Lieutenants Reece JBrown, William Blackburn,
Thomas McCulloch and Robert Edmondson— and Ensigns John Beatie, James
Corry, James Laird, Nathaniel Dryden, James Phillips and Nathaniel Guist
— and private Henry Henigar. The names of the wounded are not known, but
Col. Newell says there were twenty, so that Col. Campbell’s regiment
lost in killed nearly one half, and in wounded one-third of the whole.
Colonel Patrick Ferguson
OF THE
British Army.
One of the heroes of
King’s Mountain, and a victim of the battle upon its summit, was Col.
Ferguson, of the British army. Fighting bravely and coolly, though
wounded, he fell by a gunshot from the American militia, pressing on
with unexcelled courage to ascend the mountains and surround the British
and tory foes on the top. It is hardly possible, that, unharmed by
powder and ball, he could have escaped a surrender in a few minutes, as
flight was impracticable, and victory scarcely in the bounds of
possibility, even for the brave, and enterprising, and skilful Colonel.
In the immediate relief felt, in the upper counties of the Carolinas, by
his fall, and in the important consequences connected with his defeat,
the rejoicing was so great and universal, that history has seemed to
forget, or at least overlook his real worth, in filling up its pages. He
fell fighting as bravely for his king as Wolfe on the plains of Abraham.
The events following in both cases were immeasurable; and from first to
last equally beyond human skill, or the events of chance or weakness.
The fall of Montcalm and Wolfe was the beginning of the loss of America
to France; and the death of Ferguson, with Williams and Chronicle, the
beginning of the loss of the Southern States to the Royal army, and of
the whole United States to Great Britain. King’s Mountain, the field of
the militia of the Carolinas and Virginia, followed in succession by the
Cowpens, the theatre of the gallant Morgan with his regulars and
militia, and Guilford, the chosen battle-field of Greene with
Cornwallis, accumulated an amount of loss upon the Royal army, and
infused a power of enthusiasm into the breasts of the hitherto
discouraged patriots; the tide of war was changed, and the current of
events rushed on to the surrender of the British army at Yorktown. He
must have been no ordinary man, whose loss on an expedition through the
western counties could, as the British writers say, change the whole
course of Lord Cornwallis in his proceedings against the Carolinas. The
following facts collected by the “Senior Member of the Abingdon Literary
Club,” present Col. Ferguson in a more favorable light as a man and an
officer, than the traditions of border war, and tory and patriotic
encounters have hitherto thrown around him. He was something more noble
than the maraudings connccted with his expeditions have portrayed him to
the southern people.
Patrick Ferguson was a
Scotchman. His father, James Ferguson of Pitfane, was a Judge of
eminence. His uncle, Patrick Murray, a nobleman, held a high rank for
his literary accomplishments. The nephew was esteemed of—“equally
vigorous and brilliant powers.” He sought distinction in the army, and
at eighteen was a subaltern in the German wars, distinguished for his
cool and deliberate courage. When the troubles with America assumed a
warlike aspect, young Ferguson turned his attention to the construction
of a rifle that might, by its use in the British army, remove somewhat
of the dread the reports of the skill of the American riflemen cast upon
the spirits of the soldiery. He produced a rifle that might be loaded
six times in a minute, by an ingenious contrivance to thrust in the
charges of powder and ball, at the breech of the barrel, without
changing the position of the rifle or the marksman. Lord Townsend,
Master of Ordinance, expressed his approbation of this improved
instrument of war. The regiment to which Ferguson belonged not being
called to active service in the colonies, he sought an introduction to
the Commander-in-chief, and from him received an appointment to
discipline a corps, drafted from different regiments, to the use of his
rifle. This corps was first engaged in action at the battle of
Brandywine in Sept. 1777 ; and the service, rendered by it to the forces
under General Knyphausen, received the commendation of the
Commander-in-chief, and by his order was publicly attested, and
acknowledged by the whole army—“having scoured the ground so
effectually, that not a shot was fired by the Americans to annoy that
column in its march.’' Secured by this corps, Knyphausen advanced and
obliged the Americans to cross the river — “and opened the way to the
rest of the army.”
“Ferguson” — says a
British writer—“in a private letter of wThich Dr. Adam Ferguson
transmitted me a copy, mentions a very curious incident, from which, it
appears that the life of the American General was in imminent danger.”
While Ferguson lay with a part of his riflemen 011 a skirt of wood in
front of General Knyphausen’s division, the circumstance happened of
which the letter in question gives the following account: —
“We had not lain long,
when a rebel officer, remarkable by a hussar dress, passed towards our
army, within a hundred yards of my right flank, not perceiving us. He
was followed by another, dressed in dark green and blue, mounted on a
good bay horse, with a remarkable high cocked hat. I ordered three good
shots to steal near to them, and fire at them; but the idea disgusted
me. I recalled the order. The hussar, in returning, made a circuit, but
the other passed within a hundred yards of us; upon which I advanced
from the woods towards him. Upon my calling he stopped, but after
looking at me, proceeded. I again drew his attention, and made sign to
him to stop, levelling my piece at him; but he slowly continued his way.
As was within that distance, at which in the quickest firing, I could
have lodged half a dozen balls in or about him before he was out of my
reach, I had only to determine ; but it was not pleasant to fire at the
back of an unoffending individual, who was acquitting himself' very
coolly of his duty. So I let him alone. The day after, I had been
telling this story to some wounded officers, who lay in the same room
with me, when one of our surgeons, who had been dressing the wounded
rebel officers, came in and told us that they had been informing him
that General Washington was all the morning with the light troops, and
only attended by a French officer in a hussar dress, he himself dressed
and mounted in every point as above described. I am not sorry that 1 did
not know at the time who it was.”
In the year 1779, Colonel
Ferguson was employed in several expeditions which called forth a great
degree of British valor and ability, but were unimportant in their
results. He was engaged in the incursions upon the North, or Hudson’s
River. He was in the expedition to Charleston, South Carolina, and is
mentioned with great praise by Sir Henry Clinton, the commander-in-chief
of the British army. After the reduction of Charleston, in 1780, the
writer, quoted by the senior member, goes on to say—“When Lord
Cornwallis was attempting by justice and mildness to restore, harmony
between the provinces and the mother country, he called for the
assistance of Ferguson. To the valor, enterprise, and inventions, which
are so important in war, Ferguson was known to add the benignant
disposition and conciliatory manner which generate good-will and cement
friendship in situations of peace. Among the propositions of Cornwallis
for the security of the recovered colony, one scheme was to arm the well
affected for their own defence. Ferguson, now a Lieutenant-Colonel in
America, was entrusted with the charge of marshalling the militia
throughout a wide extent of country. Under his direction and conduct, a
militia at once numerous and select, was enrolled and disciplined. One
of the great tests of clearness and vigor of understanding is ready
classification, either of things or men, according to the qualities
which they possess, and the purposes they are fitted or intended to
answer. Ferguson exercised his genius in devising a summary of the
ordinary tactics and manual exercises for the use of the militia. He had
them divided in every district into two classes—one of the young men,
single and unmarried, who should be ready to join the king’s troops to
repel any enemy that infested the province; another, of the aged and
heads of families, who should be ready to unite in defending their own
townships, habitations, and farms. In his progress amongst them, he soon
gained their confidence by the attentions he paid to the interests of
the well affected, and even by his humanity to the families of those who
were in arms against him. We come not, said he, to make war upon women
and children; and gave them money to relieve their distresses. The
movements of the Americans having compelled Lord Cornwallis to proceed
with great caution in his Northern expedition, the genius and efforts of
Ferguson were required for protecting and facilitating the march of the
army, and a plan of collateral operations was devised for the purpose.
In the execution of these schemes he had advanced as far as Ninety-Six,
about two hundred miles from Charleston; and with his usual vigor and
success, was acting against different bodies of the Colonists that still
disputed the possession, when intelligence arrived from the British
officer, Colonel Brown, commander of his Majesty’s forces in upper
Georgia, that a corps of rebels, under Colonel Clarke, had made an
attempt upon Augusta, and being repulsed was retreating by the back
settlements of Carolina. Colonel Brown added, that he meant to hang on
the rear of the enemy, and that if Ferguson would cut across his route,
he might be intercepted, and his party dispersed. This service seemed to
be perfectly consistent with the purposes of his expedition, and did not
give time to wait for fresh orders from Lord Cornwallis. Ferguson
yielded to his usual ardor, and pushed with his detachment, composed of
a few regulars and militia, into Tyson County.
“In the meantime numerous
bodies of back settlers, west of the ! Allegheny Mountains, were in
arms, some of them intending to seize upon the presents intended for the
Creek and Cherokee Indians, which they understood were slightly guarded
at Augusta, Georgia. Others had assembled upon the alarm of enemies
likely to visit them from South Carolina. These meeting with Colonel
Clarke secured his retreat, and made it expedient for Brown to desist
from the pursuit, and return to his station at Augusta; while Ferguson,
having no intelligence of Brown’s retreat, still continued the march
which was undertaken at his request. As he w^as continuing his route, a
numerous, fierce, and unexpected enemy suddenly sprang up in the woods
and wilds. The inhabitants of the Allegheny assembled without noise or
warning, under the conduct of six or seven of their militia colonels, to
the number of 1600 daring, well-mounted and excellent horsemen.
Discovering these enemies, as he crossed King’s Mountain, Ferguson took
the best position for receiving them the ground would permit. But his
men, neither covered by horse nor artillery, and likewise being dismayed
and astonished at finding themselves so unexpectedly surrounded and
attacked on every side by the cavalry of the mountains, were not capable
of withstanding the impetuosity of their charge. Already 150 of his
soldiers were killed upon the spot, and a greater number was wounded;
still however the unconquerable spirit of this gallant officer refused
to surrender. He repulsed a succession of attacks from every quarter,
until he received a mortal wound. By the fall of Colonel Ferguson, his
men were entirely disheartened. Animated by his brave example, they had
hitherto preserved their courage under all disadvantages. The second in
command judging all further resistance to be vain, offered to surrender,
and sued for quarter. From the ability and exertions of Colonel
Ferguson, very great advantages had been expected. By his unfortunate
fall, and the slaughter, captivity, or dispersion of his whole corps,
the plan of the expedition into North Carolina was entirely deranged,
the western frontiers of South Carolina were now exposed to the
incursions of the mountaineers, and it become necessary for Lord
Cornwallis to fall back for their protection, and wait for a
reinforcement before he could proceed further on his expedition. On the
14th of October, he began his march to South Carolina. His Lordship was
taken ill, but nevertheless preserved his vigor of mind, and arrived on
the 29th of October, 1780, at Winnsborough, to wait for, fresh
reinforcements from Sir Henry Clinton.” Such is the British account of
this daring and accomplished officer, whose army was entirely destroyed
on the summit of King’s Mountain, on the 7th of October, 1780.
Colonel Ferguson was
apprised of the gathering of the militia to oppose his progress, and had
dispatched a messenger to Cornwallis for reinforcements. But the
messenger, fearing the patriots living on his route, travelled only at
night, lying by through the day, and compelled to take a circuitous
route, reached the camp of his lordship only the night before the attack
on Ferguson. The news of the defeat reached the royal camp before any
reinforcement could be sent off to aid the Col. His fall was a loss his
lordship could not repair. Rawdon and Tarlton were brave and
enterprising, and admirable for a daring expedition or a bold stroke.
Webster was a gentleman and an honorable soldier of great courage,
unequalled in the camp or in action. O’Harra was brave and capable of
the post next his lordship. But Ferguson for managing the affairs of the
country in the unsettled state of things in the Carolinas, had no equal
in the army of Cornwallis. Charleston was taken by the British forces,
on the 12th of May, 1780; Buford was defeated on the Waxhaw, on the 29th
of the same month; Gates was defeated at Camden, August 16th; Sumpter
surprised on the 18th; and South Carolina appeared to be a conquered
State. On the 7th of October, Ferguson was defeated on King’s Mountain;
January 17th, 1781, Morgan gained over Tarlton the battle at the
Cowpens; on March 15th, was the battle at Guilford C. H., followed by
the retreat of Cornwallis to Wilmington; and the Carolinas were in the
course of-the summer rescued from the power of the British army. |