The Rev. Samuel Houston,
in answer to some inquiries made by the Rev. James Morrison, the third
pastor of New Providence, gave in writing the origin of the
congregation. He begins with the grants to Beverly and Burden. “The
dividing line between their grants crossed the valley near where New
Providence church now stands.”
“Those families that came
first were nearly connected, or large families. For comfort and for
safety they generally settled near each other, and with the
understanding that as soon as practicable they might have schools for
their children; and form religious societies, and have places of public
worship. Those first settlers in the valley were mostly Presbyterians ;
but those in New Providence, I believe wholly so, at least in name. Near
the South Mountain, there were several families of the name of
Moore,—others of Steel,—near them M’ Clung,—and Fulton,—Beard ; and then
a little further on, my grand-father, John Houston, and his
brother-in-law, John Montgomery, and some by the name of Eaken. Near the
middle (of the valley), on Kennedy’s Creek and its branches were, the
Kennedys, Wardlaws, Logans; and another line of Steels, Edmundsons,
Buchanans, Pattons, Millars, Stephensons. Towards the North Mountain, on
Hays’ and Walker’s Creek, were two families of Hays, three or four
Walkers of the same stock, and their brother-in-law, James Moore; two
families of Robinsons, one of Kelly, Hudson, Thompson, Smiley, and two
of Rheas. In the midst were three of the Berry family, one of Tedford,
one M’Campbell, two or three M’Croskys, and a Coalter family. In the
course of a few years, other families came and settled amongst them;
their names were, M’Nutt, Weir, Campbell, Wilson, Anderson, Culton,
Henry, Lowry, and another stock of Edmundsons, and one family named
Todd, my grand-father on my mother’s side; two of the name of Stuart,
one of Alexander, Cowder, Gray, Jamieson, and two Pattons. Of all these
families, by intermarriages other families were soon formed; also others
coming in.
“The above settlers
commenced, at least man) of them, in the woods, and in much fear from
the savages and wild beasts. Hence at my grand-father’s house, some
distance from the South Mountain, but nearer it than the western side of
the settlement, and a house most convenient for the whole settlement to
collect their families together in case of an invasion, the settlers
erected a stockade fort, the remainders of which, I saw around the yard
when I was a boy. Near to the fort, at a place called then, and now, Old
Providence, they erected a log meeting-house, and had worship
occasionally by supplies from Pennsylvania. In those early days, the
population of Timber Ridge united with Providence to get supplies,
intending as soon as they could to have a settled pastor between them.
The lower settlement on Hays’ Creek and Walker’s Creek, felt themselves
too distant from Old Providence, and urged a more central place between
the mountains, and proposed the place, now near Witherow’s Mansion. My
grand-father prevailed upon his neighbors to meet them at the new site;
accordingly a log meeting-house wTas erected on the southern side of the
creek. The united congregations of Timber Ridge and New Providence,
called Mr. John Brown, and he was installed their pastor. The first
elders were,—a Mr. Millar, Andrew Hays, John Logan, Samuel Buchannan,
Alexander Walker, my grand-father John Houston, and Andrew Steel.” After
the congregation had agreed upon a site for a new church, having had
much difficulty in becoming united in the choice, it was proposed to
adopt a name—My aged ancestor said, Neighbors we have hitherto had
unpleasant and fruitless meetings, to-day we have had an agreeable and
successful one, and we are indebted to a kind providence: let us call it
New Providence,* to which all agreed. Then, or soon afterwards they
united in efforts; some contributing, others laboring until they
finished the stone walls, roof, doors, windows, and floor, and set in
benches and a temporary pulpit, and then rested for some years until I
was a boy capable of observation. For well do I remember sitting in my
father’s seat to see the swallows flying in and out during public
worship, to feed their young ones, in nests upon the collar beams and
wall-plates, or cavities in the stone work.”. When the people after some
years finished the work by making a pulpit with a canopy, a gallery, and
by glazing the windows, he says—“ the elders were—Andrew Hays, John
Logan, Alexander Walker, John Houston, my father, Saunders Walker, and
soon after James Henry, Charles Campbell, and James M’Campbell.
“About the year 1763 an
unhappy difference took place between the pastor, Mr. Brown, and some
leading men in Timber Ridge congregation, on account of which Mr. Brown
talked of removing. This deeply affected many of the New Providence
congregation. But at last they agreed to retain his labors entirely, and
on his accepting ,Ł80 salary from them alone, his connexion and theirs
with Timber Ridge was dissolved. Mr. Brown’s labors were continued
harmoniously in New Providence, until his powers of body failed,
especially his voice. Therefore mutually he and the congregation agreed
for him to be relieved by the congregation becoming vacant, and another
called, ajl which was in due order effected; and in a short time his
successor, Mr. Samuel Brown, was called and installed their pastor,
which brings me down to the year 1796. '
“A few remarks and I have
done. After Mr. J. B. left Timber Ridge, many of said congregation
retained much affection for him, and through much inconvenience attended
almost steadily N. P. meetings and communions as formerly. Another
remark is, that before the struggle for independence took place, N. P.
kept the Sabbath with great" strictness, and family worship was almost
universal. Another remark is, that shortly before the war, some men,
whose sons were growing up, felt a desire for having them, or part of
them, educated liberally, chiefly with a view to the ministry of the
gospel. Accordingly a small grammar school was formed in the
neighborhood of Old Providence, composed of Samuel Doak, John
Montgomery, Archibald Alexander, James Houston, William Tate, Samuel
Greenlee, William Wilson, and others, which greatly increased and drew
youths from distant neighborhoods. This grammar school was moved to the
place near Fairfield, called Mount Pleasant; it was, in 1776,
established at Timber Ridge meetinghouse, and named Liberty Hall.
"Sincerely yours,
“S. Houston.”
Tradition says the first
work after building log-cabins for themselves, was to erect a capacious
meeting-house. For permanency and dignity they determined it should be
of stone. Limestone for mortar could be found in any abundance, but sand
was brought on pack-horses six or seven miles from the stream called
South Fork. Nails and glass were brought in the same way from
Philadelphia. A sycamore, for a long time the only one in the
neighborhood, sprung from the bank of refuse sand brought from a stream
where the tree abounds. The succeeding generations knew the old
sycamore, enjoying its shade on Sabbath noon. So intent were many of the
people of New Providence that their house of worship should be properly
finished, that they forbore not only luxuries, but what are now esteemed
the necessaries of housewifery. One old lady apologized to some company
that came to eat with her, for not accommodating more at a time at the
table, and requiring them to eat by turns, that all might have the
benefit of her few knives and forks, by saying, “We intended to have got
a set of knives this year, but the meeting-house was to be finished, and
we could not give our share and get the knives, so we put them off for
another year.” The only pair of wheels in the congregation for many
years was made to draw timbers for the church. In their private concerns
the drag and sled sufficed.
Of those persons named by
Mr. Houston, students of the first grammar school — Doak, Montgomery,
Houston, and Wilson became ministers of the gospel. Dr. Doak, -well
known in Tennesseo as the laborious patron of literature, and minister
of the gospel; Houston preached in Kentucky, and in the time of the
great excitement, left the Presbyterian Church; Montgomery preached in
Virginia, and died on Cowpasture; Wilson lies buried near Augusta
Church, of which he was long a pastor. Houston and Wilson used to tell
of Doak, that as his parents lived in the bounds of Bethel, too far from
the school to live at home, he erected a cabin near the school house for
his convenience; and that the boys in their fun would frequently, while
Doak was engaged with his teacher, break into his cabin, and derange his
apparatus for cooking, and make sad work with his housekeeping; all
which he bore with great good humor, and went on cheerfully with his
studies, in preparation for that life of trial and usefulness as a
pioneer of the gospel and sound education in Tennessee. The name of the
first teacher has been preserved, but not those of his successors, till
William Graham, and John Montgomery; these are preserved in the records
of Presbytery. It does not appear that Mr. J. Brown ever himself engaged
in teaching the school which for years was in operation about a mile
from his dwelling, in which his elder children received their education,
preparatory for those posts of honor conferred upon them by the
community.
The people of New
Providence were visited by the missionaries sent out by the Presbyteries
of the Synod of New York. And May 18th, 1748, the Records of Synod say,
“A call was brought into Synod from Falling Spring and New Providence,
to be presented to Mr. Byram, the acceptance of which he declined.” The
congregation being pleased with the labors of Mr. John Brown, a
licentiate of New Castle Presbytery, who remained in the Valley for some
time as a missionary, united, in 1753, with the people of Timber Ridge
in making the call for his services. After Mr. Brown withdrew from
Timber Ridge, he continued, many years, to preach to New Providence
alone. His sketch is given under the head of Timber Ridge. That the
congregation of New Providence did not overvalue his usefulness, is seen
in their prosperity. It went united into the hands of his successors,
with a cheering prospect of usefulness, the standard of piety, an able
eldership, a large number of professors of religion, having sent into
the ministry some of her sons, and been the nursery of the Academy and
the germ of the College.
The second pastor was Mr.
Samuel Brown, settled in 1796. We know nothing of the life of John Brown
till he left college ; we know but comparatively little of his successor
before he entered on his ministry. And that little we know is from the
memoranda of a son, now a minister of the gospel. Samuel Brown, of
English origin, was born in the year 1766, of a family of moderate
circumstances, in Bedford County, Virginia, in the bounds of the
congregation of Peaks and Pisgah, the fruitful mother of many ministers
of the gospel prominent in the Virginia Church.
Crab Bottom, October
25th, 1853.
Dear Brother—In 1836 I
was at the house of Jesse Wit, the brother-in-law of my venerated
father, and took down, as directed by him, the following reminiscences.
Mr. Wit was intimately acquainted with him from childhood, went to
school with him, and subsequently my father boarded at his house, and
went to school in his neighborhood. Mr. Wit lived and died near Liberty,
Bedford County, Virginia.
Mr. Wit says :—The first
advantages he (my father) enjoyed in the way of mental culture were at
schools where the first branches only of an English education were
taught. He indulged in such sports as were common at schools, but was
entirely free from profanity, and of exemplary morals. He was the
fondest boy of his books, and the best scholar of his age I ever knew.
He often expressed a desire to obtain a liberal education, but the
circumstances of his father were not such as to enable him to give his
children a better education than would barely fit them to transact their
own business in the more ordinary walks of life. About the year 1785
there was a school taught near the Peaks of Otter, by a Mr. Bromhead, in
which the higher branches of an English education, such as English
grammar, geography, surveying, &c., might be obtained. This was not the
case in schools generally at that day. To this school he earnestly
requested his father to send him ; but his father did not think his
circumstances would justify the expense of boarding his son from home,
and declined granting the request. The son being very urgent, the father
thought to end the matter by telling him that to enable him to do so, it
would be necessary to sell his yoke of oxen. But such was the desire of
the son to learn, that, to this measure he strongly urged his father. By
some means, now unknown, he got to the school. Being possessed of more
than the ordinary talents and fondness for the science of mathematics,
and having obtained a magnetic needle, he fitted it to a compass of his
own construction, and with this, for want of a better, he practised
surveying, for his own improvement.
After leaving the school
of Mr. Bromhead, he went to Kentucky, and taught school himself, but at
the end of twelve months he returned to the house of his father in
Bedford County. This was in 1788. Shortly after his return he commenced
going to school to the Rev. James Mitchel, who resided in the
neighborhood of his father. About this time the congregations of Peaks
and Pisgah were blessed with an extensive revival of religion,
principally under the instrumentality of the Rev. Drury Lacy. Mr. Brown
became one of the subjects of renewing grace. At that time he was very
fond of playing on the violin, and was considered a good player. The
amusement of dancing also possessed in his estimation peculiar claims.
He abandoned both, and returned to them no more. Indeed, such were his
subsequent views of the great tendency of dancing to banish serious
reflections, and promote licentiousness, that even the sound of the
violin was ever afterwards unpleasant. Of the peculiar exercises of his
mind nnder his awakening, I know but little. I remember to have heard,
however, that like many others, he was for a time greatly perplexed
about the distinctive doctrines of Calvinism ; and being unable to get
the difficulties solved that were suggested to his mind, he undertook to
read the Scriptures regularly through in reference to that singl6 point,
noting down as he proceeded, what he found to favor the Arminian or
Calvinistic view. Having found so many passages which would admit of no
other than a Calvinistic interpretation, and not one on the side of
Arminian-ism but might be interpreted otherwise, he bowed to the
doctrines of divine grace, and gave his heart to God before he had gone
half through the Bible. Not long after he made his first public address.
Being at a prayer meeting in Liberty, where there was considerable
religious excitement, he arose, and with great earnestness repeated Heb.
12:14: “ Holiness—without which no man shall see the Lordand sat down.
In 1790, he boarded in my
family, in Liberty, and commenced the study of the Latin language, under
a Mr. Andrew Lyle, from Rockbridge County. Mr. L. subsequently removed
to Kentucky, and entered the ministry. He was succeeded by a Mr.
Houston, from the same county, who subsequently became.a minister of the
gospel, and removed to Ohio, where he became a Shaking Quaker. In this
school, Mr. Brown continued about two years. Thus far Mr. Wit. I am,
Dear Sir, yours in the gospel,
Henry Brown.
"While preparing for the
ministry as a candidate, he was a member of Liberty Hall Academy, under
William Graham. At the meeting of Hanover Presbytery, at Concord, July
30th, 1791, Messrs. Turner and Calhoun read parts of their trial in
preparation for licensure; the call from Philadelphia for the removal of
J. B. Smith, from Hampden Sidney College, was put in his hands with the
non-concurrence of the Presbytery; and three young men were taken as
candidates; “John Lyle, recommended to this Presbytery as a young man of
good moral character, prosecuting his studies, and desirous of putting
himself under their care, not as a candidate at present, but for their
patronage and direction, was introduced. And the Presbytery having heard
an account of his religious exercises, thought proper to encourage him
in his studies. Mr. Samuel Brown was also recommended as a young man in
nearly the same circumstances, and wishing to be taken under the
direction of Presbytery in the same manner. But the Presbytery having
heard a detail of God’s dealings with his soul, and of his motives to
engage in the ministry of the gospel, and considering the progress that
he has already made in acquiring an education, thought proper to admit
him as a candidate upon trials. They therefore agreed to assign him some
subjects as a specimen of his abilities, under this limitation, that he
be at liberty to produce them to Presbytery at any of their sessions,
when it shall be convenient to himself; and appointed him an essay upon
the Extent of Christ’s Satisfaction.” Mr. Moses Waddel, a student at
Hampden Sidney College, was also received as candidate, and parts of
trial were assigned.
At Bethel, July 27th,
1792, Mr. Brown read his essay upon the Extent of Christ’s Satisfaction.
This essay was on the 80th considered and sustained, and an essay was
appointed him upon the question—“How do men become depraved, and wherein
does that depravity consist;” and also a Presbyterial exercise upon
Romans 1st, 18th. At Providence, in Louisa, Oct. 5th, 1792, “ Mr. Brown
was appointed a popular discourse on Rom. 5th, 1st, in addition to his
other parts of trial to be produced at the next meeting.” Briery, April
5th, 1793—“The Presbytery was opened with a sermon by Samuel Brown, on
the subject assigned him.” At this meeting the Rev. Devereux Jarret took
his seat as a corresponding member. On the next evening the Presbytery
met at 7 o’clock, at the house “of old Mrs. Morton” — and after
consideration, sustained Mr. Brown’s popular sermon. The notice of his
reading his Essay and Presbyterial Exercise is omitted in the records. “
The Presbytery then proceeded to examine Mr. Brown with respect to his
knowledge in the doctrines of Divinity, and his answers being
satisfactory, it was agreed to license him to preach the gospel. And Mr.
Brown having adopted the Confession of Faith as received in the
Presbyterian Church in America, and promised subjection to his brethren
in ^he Lord, was accordingly licensed to preach the everlasting gospel
of Jesus Christ, and recommended to all the churches where God in his
Providence may call him.” At a meeting in July, at the Cove, on the 25th
instant, Presbytery recommended Mr. Brown to the commission of Synod.
Under the direction of this commission, he performed missionary service
until April 21st, 1796, when at Hampden Sidney—u Mr. Samuel Brown,
formerly a probationer under the care of this Presbytery, but for some
time past a missionary under the direction of the commission of Synod,
produced a dismission from that body, certifying his good character and
conduct while he acted as a missionary, whereupon he was again received
as a probationer under the care of this Presbytery.” On the next day—u A
supplication was laid before Presbytery from the congregations of
Providence, (Louisa), North Fork, and the Bird, to obtain Mr. Samuel
Brown to supply them for six months, in order to prepare the way for his
final settlement among them. Mr. Brown being asked whether such an
appointment would be agreeable to him, answered in the negative, as he
had already determined to remove out of the bounds of Presbytery.” He
then requested and obtained a dismission to join the Presbytery of
Lexington. The journals of Mr. Brown kept during his missionary
travelling and preaching have not, with the exception of a few
fragments, been preserved. The range was large; the bounds of the
commission extended over Virginia, West Pennsylvania, and Kentucky. With
the general extent of their bounds, and a large proportion of the
particulars, Mr. Brown became fully acquainted. And the selection of a
place of living, which he was enabled to make by the good will and
choice of the people, was characteristic of the man. For quietness,
usefulness, comfort, present success in the ministry, and prospective
in-gathering of harvests, New Providence was unsurpassed by any of the
numerous vacancies, and was equalled by few that had pastors. Honesty of
purpose, simplicity of manners, diligence in business, and a liberal
economy characterized the people of this retired but fertile region of
country. The congregation had been famous for its attachment to its
minister; and the condition in which the first minister left it, in his
feeble age bore testimony to his fidelity. The activity of a young man
was becoming visibly necessary, and Brown the first gave place
cheerfully to Brown the second; and the successor as cheerfully honored
his predecessor while reaping the fruit of his labors.
For years he pursued the
round, monotonous, were it not of eternal consequence, of a country
pastor, preaching twice on the Sabbath to a large congregation of
hearers in the old Stone Church, having an hour’s interval between the
sermons; visiting the sick and burying the dead as required, during the
week; preaching occasionally in retired neighborhoods; catechising the
children by neighborhoods annually, giving account to Presbytery of his
diligence, and the success of the parents and children therein ; and
holding communion, or sacramental meeting at stated periods during the
year. Add to these recurring duties, the responsibilities of a select
classical school, bringing a number of the pupils to be members of his
family, which he taught a greater part of the time he was pastor of New
Providence. The excellence of his teaching and discipline drew pupils
from the counties east of the Ridge, and kept his number complete. In
teaching — he was, “mild with the mild — and with the froward fierce as
fire.” Rebellion against the laws of propriety, was in his eyes like the
sin of witchcraft, and woe to the unhappy boy that ventured to find out
by experience, the manner Samuel Brown could subdue a disobedient boy.
One experiment was sufficient for his whole school life, and generally
for a whole generation of boys. But with the cheerful and the studious
and the law-abiding boy, he was like a spring morning, or the autumn
evening. Tall, spare, broad-shouldered, and not particularly careful at
all times whether he stood precisely straight, a thin visage with small
deep-set eyes, of a grey color tinged with blue, not particularly
expressive till the deep passions of the heart were aroused, “then,”
said Governor James M’Dowell, “they began to sparkle and glow, and
apparently sink deeper in his head, and grow brighter and brighter till
the sparkling black was lost in a vivid flame of fire,” then the
volcano, giving no other sign in muscle or in limb, of its subterraneous
workings, was ready to burst. Then, if the explosion was a volume of
wrath, it was terrible ; if the kindling of a great subject, the burst
of eloquence was resistless; the bolt shot forth and shivered like the
lightning.
Mr. S. Brown read and
thought closely, but wrote little. Like his neighbor Baxter, he could
arrange his thoughts into the purest English and most classic sentence
without the help of the pen. Some few manuscripts — one printed sermon —
and a few pieces in the Virginia Magazine, are all we have from his pen.
His style was simple and concise, with no approach to the florid or
verbose, or highly figurative. It was, in his most deeply interesting
sermons, that, which the hearers could never describe—because they never
observed — they were simply noticing the ideas as they came rushing
forth like a band of warriors from the opened gates. They could not tell
the plumes nor ensigns — but they could hear the heavy tread, and see
the fiery eye, and feel the fierce expression of every limb. Many of his
hearers could repeat in order the great truths of his sermons that most
interested him. But only now and then would they venture to say — “he
used these very words.” In his less interesting discourses, they could
venture to be more exact about his words. His people considered him a
great reasoner. In their estimation he always reasoned well; often
better ; and sometimes the best they could imagine. And that he could
reason well is certain from the fact, that his congregation learned to
reason admirably on the great truths of religion and morals; and that
his brethren in the ministry came to listen to his sermons with the same
emotions as his own people. The greatest men in the Synod, said he was
the greatest reasoner in the Synod, under the pressure of a great
subject. Dr. Speece, who always listened to him with pleasure, on one
occasion appeared to be entirely absorbed in his discourse; and as Mr.
Brown said — “but we. must come to a conclusion”— he unconsciously
raised his hand and said aloud, “go on, go on.”
The facts given by his
son respecting the manner in which he became satisfied on the subject of
predestination, are illustrative of his manner of reasoning from the
pulpit on common occasions. He would^ produce a great array of undoubted
facts, and so marshal them as a host prepared for battle, that no one
would like to make an onset. Or he would begin to lay the foundation of
his building on some corner-stone of the gospel, and go on tier by tier,
and story by story, till when the top stone was laid, the hearer charmed
with its beauty and symmetry, was ready to shout “grace, grace unto it.”
His hearers saw it all plain, just right; but it required Samuel Brown
to do it. His model was Paul’s Epistle to the Homans, fact after fact,
consecutive and connected, with illustrations; till some certain fact as
a conclusion seemed inevitable. Sometimes he entered into the field of
metaphysical discussion much in fashion in his day; and among the many
that failed making any impression, he was of the few that was
resistless. He could weave a wTeb his adversaries could not disentangle.
He could produce a train the common people could understand, and follow
closely and feel at the close a deep conviction of its truth; and the
wiser heads could retrace the various steps after they had reached their
homes. They could admire, but it seemed to them it took a Samuel Brown
to make it. Of his habits in the judicatories of the Church, there is
neither a memorandum nor a tradition of importance. One of his Elders
describes him thus: —
Jan. 4th, 1851.
Reverend and Dear Sir,—I
received your favor of Dec. 4th, only a few days ago, making some
inquiries respecting the Reverend Samuel Brown. In compliance with your
request, I will with pleasure, send you such notices of him as my
information on the subject will allow.
He preached his first
sermon in New Providence, after taking their call into his hands, June
5th, 1796. His text was in 4th of 2d Corinthians, 1st and 2d verses. His
second sermon on the same day was from 1st Peter, 2d and 3d verses. He
was married 9th of October, 1798, to Polly Moore, whose story is known
to you. He soon afterwards purchased a small farm near Brownsburg, and
commenced teaching a classical school. He continued the school several
years. Amongst those who were his pupils, I may name Gov. James
McDowell, Gov. McNutt, of Mississippi, Samuel McD. Moore, and Dr.
Wilson, now of Union Seminary. He attended to the business of his farm
himself, employing no overseer. His salary was only §400 per annum,
until a year or two before his death, when it was raised to $500. He was
judicious and economical in the management of his affairs. At the time
of his installation his means were nothing, his family became large, yet
at his death his estate was quite considerable. He died suddenly, 13th
October, 1818, having preached the day before. His text on that occasion
was in the 40tn chapter of Isaiah, 30 and 31.
His talents, according to
the common opinion, and that is my own, were of a very high order. His
judgment in all matters was sound and practical. In cases where it
seemed difficult to arrive at a correct decision, he seemed to seize
with facility the true view; and the clearness of his statements hardly
failed to bring others to concur with him. His preaching was impressive
and interesting. In his personal appearance he was tall and lean, his
eyes sunk deeply in his head. His voice, though not sweet, was distinct;
his manner earnest, seeming to be inspired by a deep conviction of the
truth and importance of his subject. His gestures, according to my
recollections, were few, but apppropriate. In his addresses from the
pulpit, he was eminent for strength, conciseness, and perspicuity.
Argumentative more than declamatory, he convinced the judgment of his
hearers. Plain, instructive, and practical in his discourses, he brought
the principles of the Bible to bear upon the conduct of his people in
all their relations. He also held forth very strongly the great
Calvinistic doctrines of the Scriptures. He preached repentance toward
God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. He dwelt prominently on the
total depravity of human nature, and on the necessity of regeneration.
He frequently became very much animated when preaching, and sometimes
the tears were seen to trickle down his cheeks. His sermons were short
generally. I have heard people complain sometimes that they were too
short, but never that they were too long. When he preached two sermons
on the Sabbath, as he did in the summer, his last sermon was generally
considered the ablest. I never saw but one sermon of his in print; that
one was preached at the installation or ordination of A. B. Davidson, in
Harrisonburg., Mr. Brown told me that he had preached it without much
preparation, that he had however felt liberty in the delivery of it.
When the Presbytery applied for a copy, he had none, and wrote it out as
nearly as he could; but I think he was not satisfied with it, and people
generally did not consider it as a fair specimen of his sermons.
The longer he lived
amongst his people, the more they became attached to him. He mingled
amongst them on easy and familiar terms ; took an interest in their
welfare both temporal and spiritual. His conversation was interesting,
and to use a current phrase, he was the soul of the company in which he
was. He took an active interest in the Brownsburg Circulating Library,
and was desirous to promote the taste, and the habit of reading amongst
his people. He uniformly attended to catechising once a year, at the
different places in his congregation, and made pastoral visits to some
extent. In his day it was not customary to preach at funerals. In
admitting persons to the communion of the church, he generally conversed
with them privately, and then reported to the Session. He was a man that
never shrunk from any responsibility, that properly belonged to him, in
any circumstances in which he was placed; and his opinions probably
carried more weight with them than those of any other man in this end of
Rockbridge County. He was a very kind husband, and was always heard to
speak of his wife in the most affectionate manner, and he reposed in her
judgment and opinion great confidence. His piety was undoubted. He died
universally lamented; in the prime of life, in full intellectual vigor;
in the midst of his usefulness; and when the love of his people towards
him, so far from abating, was becoming deeper and stronger.
I am yours, respectfully,
Thomas H. Walker.
As Mr. Samuel Brown
“never shrunk from any responsibilities,” so he never sought for
notoriety. He held the post of his highest desires, the pastor of a
flock of the Lord Jesus. This he sought when he entered upon the course
of studies for the ministry; and for this he longed whether at the
grammar school, or at Liberty Hall; and this he preferred to a
missionary life. And whether he directed the concerns of a small farm,
or taught a select classical school, it was to aid him in the work of a
gospel minister. And this honor and this desire he left as the
inheritance of his children. As a teacher he stimulated youth to seek
excellence; and through life he encouraged the young' to strive for
mental as well as moral culture. Dr. Speece attributes to him his
excitement for an education.
“In 1792, Mr. Samuel
Brown, one of my former teachers, wrote to my father, to persuade him to
send me to the grammar school, near New London. I was anxious to go and
through life he spoke of Samuel Brown as conferring a great favor on him
in his early life, by encouraging him to seek a liberal education.
When the bodily exercises
referred to in the sketch of Baxter, and so fully described by Davidson
in his History of the Presbyterian Church in Kentucky, made their
appearance in Virginia, Mr. Brown made a decided and open opposition. He
said they were a profane mixture with the work of God. He had meditated
upon the subject as a peculiarity of Kentucky and Tennessee; and when
they became matters of daily fact in the neighboring congregations, he
spoke out clearly and convincingly. His decision and his reasons for it,
quickened the action of Baxter’s mind, who was travelling more slowly,
yet surely to the correct decision. These two men differed in some
particulars, and by that very difference mutually affected the
operations of each other’s mind. Baxter was always ready to hear what
Brown would say, and Brown was always glad to have Baxter fully agree
with him. Baxter would listen to new things in argument, or report, or
read them as history with entire simplicity. Like a child in a botanic
garden, with the carelessness of innocence he would walk around wounding
his hands with the thorns here, and offending his smell there, with the
odor of the flowers, seeming to admire the pernicious and the deadly,
and stopping to look a moment at the pure and good; and going into the
museum to look at machinery, they should lead him to the apartments of
the garrotte, the maiden and the guillotine, at all of which he would
look with awakened curiosity as something recommended for their peculiar
excellence :—by and by his face would begin to assume a sober cast, the
lines would deepen, and the tones of voice would tremble perhaps with
emotion—Gentlemen, these are all deadly, every one— and disgraceful as
deadly;—those flowers are all poisonous, every one, except that little
group that stands in the unobserved corner. Brown would come in, his
reasoning powers as sensitive to error as the eye to the floating mote,
or the smell to the fumes of sulphur ; on he would go, shaking his head
at this, passing by that, and pausing nowhere till he met the little
group of innocent sweet flowers; and in the museum he would have felt a
cold shuddering as he looked to see what these evil things were. And in
recounting the whole affair, Baxter would have laughed outright as he
described this poisonous thing with so pretty a covering of beauteous
colors, and the queerness of those death-machines praised for their
ingenuity : and Brown would have laughed at Baxter as about to put on
the garrotte as a necklace, and hug the maiden and bite the nightshade
to find out what they were. In the final conclusion they would entirely
agree. It would have distressed them for either to have found the other
coming to an opposite conclusion. Both would have paused and
re-considered his course, and weighed his arguments, and balanced them
with his brother’s reasons. Each looked upon the other as the greater
man.
The people of New
Providence considered their pastor as completely suited to them ; they
desired no other ; they could not well conceive a better. And Mr. Brown
rejoiced in an eldership of men of simplicity of manners and purposes ;
of sterling integrity and unfeigned piety; and a congregation of
sensible people, numerous enough for all his capabilities as a pastor,
and worthy of the best exercise of those endowments of body and mind
that might be fitted for any service the Lord might call. Both were
contented. Under his ministry, the Old Stone Meeting House, endeared by
a thousand recollections, gave place to a new brick building. And as his
own log dwelling was about to be exchanged for a convenient brick
residence, nearly completed, he came suddenly to the end of life. He had
performed the services of a sacramental occasion at New Providence on
Saturday, Sabbath and Monday, the 10th, 11th and 12th of October, as his
people thought with more than usual ability. On Tuesday, the 13th,
making preparations to attend the Synod in Staunton, and giving
directions to finish some parts of his house, he ate heartily at dinner,
and in less than two hours was lifeless. Rev. John H. Rice, in the
Evangelical and Literary Magazine for December, 1818, thus writes “ The
record of the incidents of this day (14th of October) presents something
like a map of human life. In the morning we were gay and cheerful,
amusing ourselves with remarks on the country, on the comparative genius
and habits of our countrymen, and a thousand things, just as the
thoughts of them occurred, anticipating a joyful meeting in the evening
with some well-tried, faithful and beloved friends ; when suddenly, as
the flash of lightning breaks from the cloud, we were informed of the
almost instantaneous death of one of the choicest of these friends, and
one of the most valuable of men—the Rev. Samuel Brown. The road which we
should travel led by the house in which he was accustomed to preach; and
on inquiring for it, we were asked if we were going to the funeral!
Thus, as in a moment, was hope turned into deep despondency, and
gladness of heart exchanged for the bitterness of sorrow.
“We journeyed on in
mournful silence interrupted by occasional remarks, which showed our
unwillingness to believe the truth of what had been announced, and how
reluctantly hope takes her departure from the human bosom. It might have
been a fainting fit, an apoplectic stroke mistaken for the invasion of
death; and still he might be alive. The roads trampled by multitudes of
horses, all directed to the dwelling of our friend, dissipated these
illusions of the deceiver, and convinced us of the sad reality. Still,
however, when we arrived at the church, and saw the people assembling,
and the pile of red clay, the sure indication of a newly opened grave,
thrown up in the church yard,' it seemed as though we were thus, for the
first time, assured that Samuel Brown was dead. Only a few of the people
had come together on our arrival. Some, in small groups, were conversing
in a low tone of voice interrupted by frequent and bitter sighs, and
showing in strong terms, how deeply they felt their loss. Others, whose
emotions 'were too powerful for conversation, stood apart, and leaning
on the tombstones, looked like pictures of woe. Presently the sound of
the multitude was heard. They came on in great crowds. The elders of the
church assisted in committing the body to the grave. After which, solemn
silence interrupted only by smothered sobs, ensued for several minutes.
The widow stood at the head of the grave, surrounded by her children,
exhibiting signs of unutterable anguish, yet seeming to say, ‘ It is the
Lord, let him do with us what seemeth unto him good.’ After a little
time, on a signal being given, some young men began to fill the grave.
The first clods that fell on the coffin, gave forth the most mournful
sound I ever heard. At that moment of agony the chorister of the
congregation was asked to sing a specified hymn, to a tune known to be a
favorite one of the deceased minister. The voice of the chorister
faltered so that it required several efforts to raise the tune; the
whole congregation attempted to join him, but at first the sound was
rather a scream of anguish than music. As they advanced, however, the
precious truths expressed in the words of the hymn seemed to enter into
their souls. Their voices became more firm, and while their eyes
streamed with tears, their countenances were radiant with Christian
hope, and the singing of the last stanza was like a shout of triumph.
The words of the hymn are well known. —
"When I can read my title
clear."
By the time that these
words were finished, the grave was closed, and the congregation in
solemn silence retired to their homes. We lodged all night with one of
the members of the church. The family seemed bereaved, as though the
head of the household had just been buried. Every allusion to the event
too, brought forth a flood of tears. I could not help exclaiming,
‘behold how they loved him.’ And I thought the^ lamentation of fathers
and mothers, of young men and maidens, over their departed pastor, a
more eloquent and affecting eulogium, than oratory with all its pomp and
pretensions could pronounce. After this I shall not attempt panegyric.
Let those who wish to know the character of Samuel Brown go and see the
sod that covers his body, wet with the tears of his congregation.”
Mr. Brown left a widow
and ten children, seven sons and three daughters. A sketch of his widow
has appeared in the preceding volume. In about six years she followed
her husband to the tomb, and lies by his side.
The successor of Samuel
Brown, and third preacher of New Providence is James Morrison, now
filling the pulpit. He became the son-in-law of the widow, and a true
brother of the children. |