PAINTINGS from Scotland by
Scottish artists do not seem nowadays to find much acceptance in
America. They are rarely found in the catalogues of the many art sales
in New York or Boston or the other large cities, and in the art dealers'
establishments the best-known painters of Scotland are unknown either by
name or by example. In art circles, in periodicals devoted to art, and
in the columns of newspapers which make a feature of artistic matters,
hardly any attention is paid to collecting and presenting news from the
Scottish studios, and even the gossip of American professional critics
seldom troubles itself concerning what may be passing in Scotland, where
so many recognized masters have gained their reputation and established
a national claim to artistic recognition. The amateur lovers and
professional creators of art in America talk glibly of Chalon, of
Palmaroli, of Gamier, of Gerome, but of Thomson, Phillip, Macnee,
MacCullough, Allan, Faed, or any of the recognized Scottish masters they
seem to know nothing.
This is singular when we
consider that so many other professional, as well as business and
working, men from Scotland, and Scottish products generally, find such a
kindly reception in America. The Scottish artisan is always welcomed in
every section of the United States as a superior, thorough, and
industrious workman, one with a degree of intelligence above his
fellows; the Scottish farmer is hailed as an accession in each
agricultural community, and it is safe to say that there is not an
American steamer afloat on which the services of Scotch engineers are
not in use or in demand. In the higher walks of life the influence of
Scotland is everywhere seen. Scottish architecture has been closely
studied, and the old Baronial style has been copied, adapted, or
"applied" to the majority of American modern villas, and, in fact, along
with the so-called Colonial style, was the main foundation for the
exteriors of such places until recently supplanted by the nondescript
"Queen Anne" and pseudo-Elizabethan styles. Even in many public
buildings, although a sort of mongrel renaissance is the prevailing fad,
the towers and peaks and gables of the Scottish school take the place of
the "Grecian" front elevations, with their wooden pillars and impossible
pediments. Scotch financiers stand above the tumults, the reactions, the
bull-and-bear movements of the stock exchanges, veritable pillars of
strength in a seething, sonic-times repulsive, sea of dishonesty and
dishonor. Scottish theology has been gratefully accepted by Americans,
and not even in Scotland have the writings of such men as Prof. A. B.
Bruce, Dr. Calderwood, the late Dr. John Ker, Dr. Oswald Dykes, and Dr.
Buchanan more appreciative readers. Scottish poetry, too, is also in
great vogue; Robert Buchanan, for instance, used to be a favorite;
several editions of "Olrig Grange" were readily disposed of when that
poem first appeared; Shairp's verses also found a ready sale, and even
Pollok's "Course of Time" has been printed in a dozen different forms.
There are a half a dozen editions of Aytoun's "Lays," and there are
numerous editions of Motherwell, Montgomery, Campbell, and most of our
poets, printed and sold in this country. Scots songs are sung on every
concert platform, and students of Burns are as numerous as in Scotland.
Indeed, probably the most ambitious edition of the works of the Ayrshire
bard—six large volumes with notes, steel engravings, and all sorts of
editorial paraphernalia—was published in Philadelphia only a few years
ago. Of the Waverley Novels there are over twenty-five distinct editions
in the market, and editions of Scott's poetry seem to grace, either
completely or singly, every publisher's catalogue. One firm has printed
over 300,000 copies of Barrie's works, and there is a choice of various
editions of any of the writings of Stevenson or Black. Excepting art,
everything Scotch, from curling to philosophy, seems to find congenial
soil in America.
This lack of appreciation of Scottish art applies as much to loan
exhibitions and museums and public galleries, of which better things
might be expected, as to private collections and the dealers offerings
or stock in trade. In the Metropolitan Museum of Art, at New York, the
greatest institution of its kind in America, not a single work painted
in Scotland by a Scottish artist is to be found. Even in the large and
costly collection of Miss Catharine Lorillard Wolfe, which by terms of
its bequest to the museum is kept distinct from the other pictures, and
which is undoubtedly the crowning artistic feature of the institution,
the absence of Scottish art is equally apparent.
In the Lenox Library of New York, founded by
a Scotsman and still mainly directed by a Scotsman, we find a somewhat
similar condition of affairs. True, the collection there is not large,
but every picture on view is supposed to be a representative one, and
ought to be, if placed on exhibition in accordance with the ideas on
which the library was founded. In such a collection we would naturally
expect to find some Scotch examples, yet, instead, we have some rather
paltry sketches by Sir David Wilkie, of no interest to the public and of
little value even to art students, certainly not representative of the
man; a Painting of the Scottish regalia which is attributed to Wilkie,
but with which he had no more to do than the man in the moon, and a
couple of specimens (one of them doubtful) of Sir Henry Raeburn. These
things, with a very commonplace bust of Scott from Steell's studio, but
not his handiwork, and a really good bust of Dr. Chalmers, evidently
modeled by Steell himself, are all that represent Scottish art in what
might be or ought to he the great repository of that art in America.
What has been said of these institutions may be held to apply to all the
other art centres in the country. Even at the Chicago World's Fair
Scottish artists were poorly represented. There were several Scotch
canvases in the British section, but not one that really commanded
attention. So far as art was concerned, Poland far outstripped Scotland
in excellence, variety, and in the evident genius of the artists.
Scottish sculpture is no more highly
regarded than the sister art of painting. Not long ago a replica of
Stevenson's fine statue of Sir William Wallace, which is on the corbel
over the entrance to the hero's monument on Abbey Craig, near Stirling,
was unveiled in Baltimore, and the pose of the figure is laughed at in
every circle that makes any pretention to art culture. The pose, they
say, is theatrical, the drawn sword is too prominent a feature, the
figure itself is stiff, there is nothing below the armor, and so on. Of
course people who know why the figure and sword were posed as they are
and the latter made so prominent will admit that the artist made the
most of his original opportunity for a particular effect. But Americans
do not know this, and so they criticise the figure as they find
it—standing on an ordinary pedestal in the midst of a park landscape—and
find much to sneer at and condemn. If they had said the pose was simply
unsuited to the location in which the replica is placed, every one would
have agreed with them, and an additional argument against the use of
replicas would have been added to the stock on hand. But when they fail
to take the change of position into account and simply condemn on
general principles their criticism is not worth considering from an
artistic standpoint, although, commercially, it is to be regretted. Sir
John Steell is represented in America by two statues in Central Park,
New York, one a replica in bronze of the figure of Scott, which, in
marble, sits under the arch of the monument at Edinburgh, and the other
his figure of Burns, of which there are replicas in Dundee and London.
Those who know anything of the inside workings of Steell's studio while
the Burns statue was in process of development will not be anxious,
however patriotic they may be, to claim that statue as one of even his
second-rate works, for it must be confessed that, while in parts it
shows the genius of the sculptor, it certainly is, as a whole,
disappointing. His statue of Scott, however, has long since passed the
gauntlet of criticism, and been accepted as a masterpiece, in spite of
the clumsiness of the plaid and the stiff massiveness of the whole
figure. Yet in New York there is a sort of trades union society of local
sculptors, which openly advocates the removal of both these figures to a
less prominent place, and would not mourn were they stolen from their
pedestals some night and broken up beyond hope of repair. One guide
book, describing these statues says:
"They are coarsely modeled by a man with a
local fame in Scotland, but no artist." This criticism, it must be
remembered, was written in a city which contains more atrocious examples
of the sculptor's art than any other in the world, such caricatures as
the bronze figures of S. S. Cox, Roscoe Conkling, Horace Greeley, W. E.
Dodge, and Secretary Seward, which seek honor and recognition in the
most prominent thoroughfares. Beside any of them Steell's work, even his
poorest, rises as the modeling of a master.
The trouble, however, does not lie now, nor
has it ever lain, with any prejudice on the part of the people against
either Scottish art or artists as such. It is rather the result of a
fashionable current directing the public taste toward Continental
schools and a lack of enterprise on the part of the artists in Scotland
themselves in not catering to the wants and whines or tastes of the
people. Scottish artists residing in America have, from the very
beginning of its history, really attained as much honor and success as
their countrymen have won in other walks of life. The names which follow
will abundantly demonstrate the truth of this assertion.
So far as we have been able to discover, the
first Scotch painter to make his home in America was John Smibert, who
was born in the Grassmarket of Edinburgh in 1684. He served an
apprenticeship as a house painter, but his artistic ambition led him to
aspire higher, and he went to London, where, after a time, he made a
comfortable living by copying paintings for dealers. Then, after he had
saved a little money, he went to Italy, where he studied hard, copied
many of the most famous works of the old masters, and made many friends,
among them Dr. Berkeley, afterward Bishop of Cloyne. In 1728 he crossed
to America in the company of that divine, with the idea of becoming
professor of drawing, &c., in a university which it was proposal to
found at Bermuda. While the negotiations regarding that seat of learning
were in progress, Smibert took up his residence at Newport. When the
university scheme was abandoned the artist settled in Boston, where he
acquired not only reputation, but a comfortable fortune by his art.
Horace Walpole, in his "Anecdotes of Painting," describes him as "a
silent and modest man, who abhorred the finesse of some of his
profession." A number of his paintings are still to be seen in Vale
University, in the Boston Museum of Fine Arts, and in the houses of many
old New England families. He married a lady belonging to a well-known
Boston family, and had two children. One of them, Nathaniel, gave
promise of attaining celebrity as an artist, but he died at an early
age. Smibert died in 1751.
Smibert excelled as a portrait painter.
America had not in his time got as far advanced in a love of art to
affect to admire efforts that were not to a certain degree utilitarian,
useful, and productive of dignity, as well as being ornamental. The most
famous; perhaps, of American portrait painters was Gilbert Charles
Stuart, who was descended from a Scotch family and was born in Rhode
Island in 1756. He went to Scotland when a lad and studied painting
there, but when his teacher died he returned to America and made his
living by painting portraits at Newport. In 1778 he crossed over to
London and attracted the attention of Benjamin West, the greatest of all
American artists, and from that time he was able to date his success in
life. His own studio in London, which he opened in 1781, was a
fashionable resort, and he painted portraits of King George III., the
Prince of Wales, (George IV.,) and many of the most celebrated
characters of the time, He also painted, in Paris, a portrait of Louis
XVI., the unfortunate sovereign on whom the wrongs and misgovernment of
a race of Kings were avenged at the French Revolution. Stuart settled
down in his native country in 1793 and painted many of its most
distinguished sons. His portraits of Washington are generally accepted
as the best which have been made of that great and good man, and by them
Stuart's name has been kept prominently before the people of the United
States. He died at Boston in 1828.
James Smillie, who may be regarded as the
American founder of an artistic family, landed at Quebec in 1821. His
father and elder brother, who were with him, were jewelers, and they at
once went into business in that quaint, historic town. James did the
engraving and chasing for the establishment. His abilities won the
notice of Lord Dalhousie, then Governor General of Canada, and that
nobleman sent him to London to study. Smillie failed to get the sort of
instructor he wanted, and he returned to his native city of Edinburgh,
worked there for five months, and then rejoined his relatives in Quebec.
In 1829 he settled in New York and established himself as a line
engraver. An engraving after Weir's picture of "The Convent Gate"
brought him into favorable notice, and he soon had all the work on hand
he could accomplish. In 1830 he became an associate of the National
Academy, and an Academician in 1851. Among his most successful
engravings are "Mount Washington," after Kennett; "Dover Plains," after
Durand, and "The Rocky Mountains," after Hierstadt. Mr. Smillie in his
latter years lived in retirement at Poughkeepsie, where he died in 1884.
There is no doubt he was the most successful line engraver of his time
in America, and one of his brothers, William Cumming Smillie, was long
equally recognized as a leader among the bank-note engravers of this
country and Canada.
Of Mr. Smillie's sons, two have carried on
to the present day the reputation he so deservedly won for the family
name. James D. Smillie, who was born in New York in 1835, made his mark
by his engravings of Darley's illustrations to Cooper's novels. He
became a National Academician in 1876. Besides being noted as an
engraver, J. D. Smillie has won much success as a painter in oil and
water colors, and such works as "The Cliffs of Normandy," in oil, and
"The Passing Herd," in water color, have given him a place among the
most praiseworthy artists of the country. He was President of the Water
Color Society in 1873 and 1878. Mr. Smillie has also shown exquisite
skill as an etcher, and the best-known specimen of his work in that
method is the etching of the magnificent statue of Robert Burns at
Albany, the work of his friend, Charles Calverley. His brother William
M. was eminent as a letter engraver, and was General Manager of the
American Bank Note Company when he died, in 1884. The third son of James
Smillie, George Henry Smillie, is a National Academician and a master of
oil and water color, and such works as "A Florida Lagoon," "A Lake in
the Woods," and "Under the Pines of the Yosemite " show that he has
inherited a full share of the wonderful talent of the family.
Among landscape artists in America none have
been accorded a higher position by critics and the public alike than
William Hart, who died at Mount Vernon June 17, 1894, in his
seventy-second year. When a boy his parents removed from Kilmarnock,
and, crossing the Atlantic, settled at Albany, where William, after a
brief schooling, was apprenticed to a coachbuilder. He was then
instructed in the art of decorating carriage panels, and that employment
awakened his artistic tastes. A severe illness made him leave the
coachmaker's employment when seventeen years of age, and on recovering
he opened a studio at Trov, where he did both portrait and landscape
work, and by dint of patient devotion to his subjects not only earned a
livelihood, but steadily added to his knowledge of his art. A visit to
Scotland completed his artistic education and training, and after three
years' sketching there he returned, in 1853, to America with several
portfolios filled with drawings and "bits," and suggestions for future
works, He opened a studio in New York, and in 1855 was elected an
Associate of the National Academy. Three years later lie was chosen an
Academician. His works betokened careful, thoughtful, and conscientious
work, and in country scenes introducing animal life lie particularly
excelled. There was nothing outre in his methods; no straining after
mere color effects, no desire to startle by following the dictates of
some of the new schools, which, now and again, in his time, as to the
present day, strive to capture public attention by sonic royal road to
excellence, which ends in bathos—the Pre-Raphaelite, for instance.
Hart's excellence was the result of a careful desire to reproduce nature
and show on his canvases every little detail, which, taken together,
make up completeness. Among his most noted works, all of which exemplify
his technique, his devotion to the highest principles of art and his
mastery of that art, are: "Coming From the Mill," "The September Snow,"
"Autumn in the Woods of Maine," "Scene on the Peabody River," "Twilight
on the Brook," "Goshen, N. B."; "Twilight," "A Brook Study," "Easter Sky
at Sunset," water color; "The Golden Hour," "'Morning in the Clouds,"
"Keene Valley," "Cattle Scenes," "Landscape with Jersey Cattle," "The
Ford," "Scene on Napanock Creek," "A Modern Cinderella," and "After a
Shower."
Mr. Hart was equally great in the use of
water color as of oil. Indeed, the former, perhaps, was his favorite
mode of artistic expression, and his love for it led him to take an
active part in the formation of the American Society of Water Colorists,
of which lie was President for three terms, 1870-73. For many years also
lie was President of the Brooklyn Academy of Design.
A brother of this noted Painter, James
McDougall Hart, has gained equal fame in the annals of American art.
Born at Kilmarnock in 1828, be, like his brother, crossed the Atlantic
in boyhood and began life in the service, of a coac1'bi'ilcier at
Albany. In 1851 he went to Dusseldorf and studied art, and on his return
settled in Albany, where lie opened a studio. After about four years'
struggle in that good old phlegmatic Dutch town, he thought his
opportunity for the future lay in New York, and there he removed, and
soon won a prominent place among local artists. His pastoral scenes,
especially, won him popularity, and as a landscape painter none of his
contemporaries excelled him for his faithfulness to nature and the
poetic glamour he threw into most of his work. Like his brother, he
never tried any of the tricks which so many artists attempt to win
attention, and it is noted that one can study any of the productions of
this painter's easel and find the attractiveness of the subject growing
as a result of that study. Such is notably the case with his "Summer
Memory of Berkshire" and his "Indian Summer," both of which won deserved
applause when exhibited at the Paris Salon in 1878. They are poems as
well as pictures, and arouse many pleasing thoughts in the mind of the
spectator who has any power of thought at all. So, too, with the
masterpiece which he exhibited at the Centennial Exhibition in 1876— "A
Misty Morning"—a work which stood out in bold relief among the
contributions of American artists to the collection there displayed for
its wonderful interpretation of one of nature's moods. Some affect to
find little to praise or enlarge upon in such works as that of Mr. Hart,
because they are so true to nature that they awaken nothing discordant
in the mind or present anything particularly odd to attract the eye.
Their very fidelity is apt to make them be overlooked in an exhibition,
while a flaring canvas, with an unearthly green foreground, a
wooden-like Figure in a glaring yellow gown, and a sky with a series of
streaks of all the colors on the palette, would attract a gaping crowd
and charm the dilettantes and the newspaper art critics, the latter
mainly because it would give them a chance to display their stock of
artistic slang. Such paintings as that of "Cattle Going home" are not
enthusiastically praised for the same reason that the Scotch sewing
woman saw nothing to admire in Burns's poem, "The Cotter's Saturday
Night," because it told just what she saw done every night in her own
father's house since ever she could remember. So long as Scottish art in
America is represented by the examples we have named, and by such
paintings as "Moonrise in the Adirondacks," "A Breezy Day on the Road,"
" On the North Shore," and a dozen others from the same studio, her
lovers will have no occasion to " hints their heids."
Another landscape painter of note was James
Hope, who was born not far from Abbotsford in i8iS, and settled on a
farm in Canada, along with his parents, when a boy. lie was for a time a
teacher in a seminary at Castleton, Vt., and it was not until 1848 that
lie found it possible to put into practice an ambition which had long
possessed him and devote his time entirely to art. After considerable
struggles to gain a footing, he took up his abode in New York in 1853,
and soon found a market for his canvases. In 1865 he was chosen an
Associate of the National Academy, and such works as "Rainbow Falls,"
"The Forest Glen," or "The Gem of the Forest," amply proved his genius
for landscape painting. From 1872 till his death Mr. Hope spent his time
in quiet retirement at Watkins Glen, New York.
In a purely popular sense no
Scottish-American artist ever commanded so wide attention as Alexander
Hay Ritchie, who died at New Haven, Conn., Sept. 19, 1895. He was born
at Glasgow in 1822, and in early life removed to Edinburgh and was
educated in Heriot's Hospital. He was apprenticed to a firm of
machinists, but developed a taste for art, and studied under Sir William
Allan, one of the most famous of the historical painters of Scotland. In
1843 he settled in the United States, after a Short stay in Canada, and
soon afterward took up his residence in Brooklyn, where he resided until
just before his death. He quickly acquired high rank as an engraver in
stipple and mezzotint, and gradually won a reputation as an original
painter in oils, particularly of portraits and historic scenes in which
figures predominated. His popularity reached its height by his painting
of the "Death of Lincoln," and such works as "Mercy Knocking at the
Gate," "Fitting Out Moses for the Fair," showed that he possessed the
charms of fancy as well as the graces of art. His painting of
"Washington and His Generals" proved equally popular, and by means of
his own engraving of it, that patriotic group now decorates thousands of
homes throughout the American continent. As a portrait painter, In which
work his "Dr. Mc-Cosh," "Henry Clay," and "Professor Charles Hodge of
Princeton" are notable examples, Mr. Ritchie left some particularly
creditable examples of his skill, while as a book illustrator his graver
was constantly employed for many years prior to his death.
Pleasing memories are recalled by such
examples of pure art as "The Palisades," "Sugar Loaf Mountain," "Autumn
in the Adirondacks," and other pictures of John Williamson, an artist
who found in and around the magnificent scenery of the Hudson constant
employment for his brush, and a perpetual incentive to attain the
highest possible ideal of his art. He studied that noble stream from its
source to the sea, and knew it, and could reproduce it in all its moods.
Williamson was born in the very inartistic region of Tolcross, Glasgow,
in 1827, and died at Glenwood-on-Hudson in 1885, nearly all of his life
being passed on this side of the Atlantic, as he was taken from his
native land while a child.
Another artist who had Glasgow for his
birthplace was Thomas Lachlan Smith, whose specialty was winter scenes,
and who contributed two notable pictures to the collection at the
Centennial Exhibition—"The Deserted House" and "The Eve of St. Agnes."
Smith received his artistic training in the studio of George H. Boughton
(now winning yearly successes in London) at Albany, and he opened a
studio in that city in 1859. 1n 1862 lie forsook Albany for New York,
where he died in 1884, having won a recognized position among the
American painters of his time.
So much for painters. We may now, having
shown the merits of the Scottish-American " limners," bring forward some
instances of those who have Avon fame with the chisel and molding tools.
One of the earliest of these on our list is John Crookshanks King, who
was born in the ancient and historic village of Kilwinning, Ayrshire, in
1806, and died in the historic city of Boston in 1882. He was educated
in his native county, and there served his apprenticeship to his
trade—that of machinist. In 1829 Le crossed the Atlantic, and for a time
was Superintendent of factories in Louisville and Cincinnati. It was in
1834 that he began to understand the extent of his genius for modeling,
and in that year he made a clay figure which so pleased Hiram U. Powers,
America's most poetic sculptor, that he advised him to devote his entire
attention to such work. After a brief residence in New Orleans, King
settled in Boston in 1840, and in that city most of his artistic career
was spent. Among his best-known busts are those of Daniel Webster, John
Quincy Adams, and Ralph Waldo Emerson. King also excelled as a maker of
cameo portraits a branch of art which at present has gone out of
fashion, although there are not wanting signs that it will again become
a fad in the society world.
Few if the man,,- thousands of visitors to
the memorial temple which rises over the lloon, not far iroin the Auld
Brig, as a national tribute to the memory of the genius who gave fame to
that classic section of Ayrshire by his pen, know that the two figures
representing "Tarn o' Shanter" and "Souter Johnnie" which are shown in
the grounds below are the work of a sculptor who died on a farm at
Ramapo, N. Y., in 1830. James Thom, the sculptor in question, ended his
career in that lonely spot a sadly disappointed man. He was born in
Ayrshire, and began life as a stone mason. He acquired the art of
modeling mainly by his own personal observation and practice, and in
1828 produced the two figures which, shown on the banks of the Doon,
have preserved his name to the present (lay. In an artistic sense he
never advanced any further than these statues, and such works as his
figure of "Old Mortality" simply reproduced their artistic beauties and
defects. It seems a pity that Thorn (lid not have the benefit of two or
three years' practical training at sonic of the art centres, but fate
denied him the opportunity, and all his work was (lone in a narrow and
rather primitive groove. But he was a genius undoubtedly, and lacked
merely the necessary study to have been able to give full expression to
the ideals he so earnestly tried to interpret with his chisel. His work
was very popular with the people, but his studio at Ayr was never
greatly burdened with orders, and it was in the hope of winning a more
remunerative popularity that he emigrated. In America, however, there is
no trace of his having had any success at all, or even of his doing any
work.
A much more modern instance of a Scottish
sculptor's success in America is that of Mr. I. M. Rhind, son of a once
well-known Edinburgh sculptor. Mr. Rhind settled in New York from
Edinburgh in 1888, and was not long in coming to the front among that
city's sculptors. His most noted work—the Kin- memorial fountain at
Albany—is an elaborate and thoughtful group of sculpture, rather than a
single example, and shows the artist to be a man of imagination as well
as of artistic ability. Its theme is that of Moses striking the rock,
and the story is completely told in the attitude and composition of all
the figures, from the majestic representation of Moses to the sweet
outline of the baby which is getting from its mother a draught of the
blessed water flowing from the rock in answer to the stroke from the
Patriarch's staff. Mr. Rhind also executed one of the magnificent bronze
doors now on Trinity Church.
Visitors to New York's Central Park have
admired the beautiful carved work on the Terrace and Mall—work that is
now beginning to lose its sharp outline under stress of the weather
changes, which in the Northern States are so destructive of outdoor
stonework. A great deal of this carving was done by Robert Thomson, a
sculptor of exquisite taste, who, if we may judge by his work in Central
Park, was as conscientious and thorough in his attention to the most
trifling and almost hidden details as to those things which were certain
to arrest the public eye. For many years there stood in the same park a
group modeled by hint to which was given the name of "Auld Lang Syne."
It represented Tam o' Shanter and Souter Johnnie enjoying a crack, with
the usual accompaniments. To a Scotsman the group was more than a work
of art; it was a glimpse o' hame. Every Scot resident in New York knew
each line in the group, and every new arrival in the community was taken
to the nook where it stood, or was sent there soon after his arrival.
After several years of exposure the freestone in which the figures were
carved began to show signs of disintegration, and to save the work it
was removed to the building at the Casino where the Crawford models were
on view, and there it was badly damaged in the fire which laid that
building in ruins. It is still stored somewhere in the park, but too
much worsted in its encounter with the flanges to be attractive—even to
Scotsmen, it is said. After a residence of some fifteen years in this
country, spent mainly in New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore, Mr.
Thomson returned to Scotland, and, settling in Edinburgh, continued his
work as a sculptor. He executed, among other things, several figures for
the niches in the Scott Monument, including Jeannie Deans and the Laird
of Dumbiedykes. He died in that city early in 1895. One of Thomson's
pupils, Alexander M. Calder, a native of Aberdeen, has long held a noted
position among Philadelphia sculptors. He cut or designed most of the
carved work on the new Public Buildings, and that magnificent pile is
crowned by his gigantic figure of William Penn.
George E. Ewing, the once noted Glasgow
sculptor, whose figure of Burns stands in that city's famous plaza,
George Square, closed a somewhat varied career in New York in 1884. He
had done much good work in Glasgow and the West of Scotland, and many
Scots in America were surprised when he forsook his native land and
entered upon a new career in New York. Whatever expectations he had
formed of America were doomed to disappointment, and his experience was
a succession of failures. The fact was, he was too old on reaching
America to begin life anew, and his artistic methods and ideals were too
firmly cast to adapt themselves to the taste of the American
connoisseurs, and so accomplish anything like satisfactory financial
results. He executed some very pleasing busts, notably one of the Rev.
Dr. Taylor, and one of the Rev. Dr. Omiston, both good examples of
conscientious modeling, with, in the bust of Dr. Ormiston, a dash of
genius which marked the artist; but these things brought no " grist to
the mill." After two years' struggling in New York, Ewing went to
Philadelphia, but there his success was no greater, and his life became
full of sadness. When Henry Irvin- first visited Philadelphia Ewing
called on hint—they were acquainted long before. Learning of his plight,
the great actor at once gave him a commission to execute a medallion
portrait of himself and one of Miss Terry. To get the necessary sittings
he accompanied the actors to New York and lodged at the Brevoort House.
There, one morning, lie was found lying dead in bed. The room was partly
filled with gas from an open jet in the chandelier, and it was supposed
that Mr. Ewing had either not noticecl the escape when he retired to
bed, or, in extinguishing the light had involuntarily reopened the jet.
The remains were interred in Greenwood Cemetery, Brooklyn. Mr. Ewing
virtually left nothing on this side of the Atlantic by which his ability
as a sculptor can Publicly be judged, a fact which is to be regretted,
for lie was a nian of brilliant parts, with high ideals as an artist,
and would have at least amply justified his Scottish reputation had a
fitting opportunity been vouchsafed to him.
In the Wellstood family, which for a long
series of years had at least two representatives in the foremost ranks
of American engravers, we find several men of undoubted artistic ability
who devoted their whole lives toward improvement of that branch of art.
The family was an Edinburgh one, and is still in some of its branches
active in the daily doings of that grand old city. John Geikie Wellstood
was born in Auld Reekie in 1813, and settled in New York in 1830. After
being in business for several years, his firm merged in the American
Bank Note Company, and he remained in that concern until 1871, when he
founded the Columbian Bank Note Company in Washington, of which he
became President. In connection with this establishment lie modeled and
partly engraved the backs of all the United States Treasury notes. When
all work of this class was undertaken by a Government bureau Mr.
Wellstood returned to New York and became again connected with the
American Bank Note Company. As a script engraver lie was considered
superior to any man of his time.
His brother, William, born at Edinburgh in
1819, and who was for a long term of }'ears engaged in business in New
York, devoted himself more to pictorial work, and his portraits of
Longfellow, President Grant, and Florence Nightingale, were long ranked
as among the best examples of the American engraver's art. High praise
is due also to such works as his "Mount Washington," after Gifford, and
his "Coast of Mount Desert," after William Hart. For a small engraving,
an engraving in which the engraver has put his heart as much as painter
ever did into his canvas, we know of nothing finer than the portrait of
Hew Ainslie, the poet, with its emblematic wreath, which William
Wellstood engraved after a design by his brother Stephen, for the
edition of Ainslie's poems issued in 1855. James, a son of William
Wellstood, who was horn in New York City in 1877 and died in 1880, was
an engraver of much promise, as is amply evidenced by his "Safe in
Port," after the painting of that name by William Moran. The whole
family, however, have been in one way or another distinguished "above
the lave," and would require a chapter to themselves, instead of merely
the passing notice it is within the province of a volume like this to
give.
A noted example of an engraver developing
into a painter—and a painter of first rank—is furnished by the career of
Walter Shirlaw. Born in Paisley—the town of poets—in 1838, and
emigrating to the United States with his parents two years later, Mr.
Shirlaw's entire education, artistic and otherwise, has been gained on
this side of the Atlantic. He learned the trade of engraving—his
specialty being work on bank notes—but even when a child had
inclinations for the higher branch of art. and the first picture lie
exhibited, at the National Academy in 1861, won such favorable comment
that he decided to leave engraving alone for the future. After studying
in Munich for a year or two, he returned to America, and his career
since then as, a landscape artist has been one of continued and
increasing success. Among his most noted works have been " Jealousy,"
now owned by the National Academy of Design; "Good Morning," "Sheep
Shearing in the Bavarian Highlands," "Gossip," and "Indian Girl." Mr.
Shirlaw became an Academician in 1888, and was one of the founders and
the first President of the Society of American Artists.
We would like to devote considerable space
to the hundreds of Scotch architects who have been at work in this
country since it began to cultivate the arts, but the subject is too
great to be even more than barely hinted at at the tail end of a
chapter, and that is all that our scheme will permit. So we must content
ourselves with a couple of examples.
In an issue of the New York
"Scottish-American" for 1888 is the following notice regarding an early
architect whose name is by no means yet forgotten in New York:
"The alterations now in progress at Castle
Garden reveal much of the old work of Alexander McComb, the old New York
architect, who was the most prominent member of his profession in this
country in the middle of last century. He was a native of Scotland, but
of what county is not known, although it is generally believed to have
been Ayrshire. When the old City Hall, in Wall Street, was remodeled and
practically rebuilt, Mr. McComb was the architect, and a very stately
building it was. McComb amassed considerable wealth, bought a large
tract of land in the Adirondacks, and finally settled there, leaving his
business to his son, John. His name is still recalled by McConib's Dam
Bridge, in the tipper Part of the city.
"John McComb was born in this city in 1763,
and was as successful as his father. He erected a fine house for himself
in Bowling Green, which was long known as the McComb Mansion, and all
the principal buildings put tip in New York between 1795 and 1830 were
designed by him. His greatest work, so far as we know, is the present
City Hall, the cornerstone of which was laid in 1803, when Edward
Livingston, the descendant of an old and aristocratic Scotch family, was
Mayor. Another memorial of McComb's skill is old St. John's Church, on
Varick Street, which in its day was thought to be a more perfect and
comfortable church than old St. Paul's, at the corner of Vesey Street
and Broadway. McComb also designed several improvements at Castle
Clinton, (now Castle Garden,) some of which after being concealed by
wooden erections for many years are again being exposed to view. He
lived to a good old age, dying in this city in 1853, and left a name
that will ever rank prominent among New York architects."
A more modern example may be selected in the
career of John McArthur, who was born in Bladenock, Wigtonshire, in
1823. in 1848 he did his first public work in this country, when he
designed the House of Refuge in Philadelphia. Since then he has designed
scores of public buildings, such as the Naval Hospitals at Philadelphia,
Annapolis, Md., and Mare Island, Cal.; Public Ledger Building,
Philadelphia; Lafayette College, Easton, Penn., and for his crowning
work, the new Public Buildings of Philadelphia. In 1874 Mr. McArthur
declined the offer of the office of Supervising Architect of the
Treasury.
It would hardly do to pass away from the
architects without some mention of the men who interpret their ideas—the
mechanics. In stonework, Scotch masons long held the lead in this
country; wherever a stone building was being erected, Scotsmen in
greater or lesser numbers were certain to be found. Every building of
any size in the country, it may be safe to say, owes something to Scotch
ingenuity. The Capitol at Albany, the State I-louse at Boston, the Tomns
at New York, the Metropolitan Museum, the City Hall at Chicago, and
hundreds of other edifices famous over the country were reared amid the
sound of the Doric. To take one notable instance, the Smithsonian
Institution at Washington was built by Gilbert Cameron, a native of
Greenock, who for several years was the most noted contractor in the
Capital City. When the civil war broke out Cameron, then an old man,
found himself in possession of a competency, and, despising all schemes
for amassing greater wealth, lie returned to his native country and
spent his time in a house he called "Washington Cottage," at Greenock,
until his death, in 1866. |