It requires a person of
much more spirituality and habitual intercourse with heaven than I have,
to travel in this way, as there is so very seldom the regular
opportunity for private devotion; and there is really nothing that can
be a substitute for intercourse with God.— Andrew Murray.
MURRAY’S interest in the emigrant farmers being undiminished, he
prepared in May, 1851, to cross the Vaal River for the third time. On
this occasion he was accompanied by his brother John and the young wife
of the latter. The visit was a hurried one and lasted less than four
weeks. The only places visited were Potchefstroom and Rustenburg, where
the newly-completed church edifices were duly dedicated to the service
of God. As on former occasions large numbers flocked to the services,
and the roomy churches were quite unable to contain the congregations.
Loud were the laments which assailed Murray’s ear on the score of his
refusal of their call. “ Are we to be always pastor less?” they cried,
nor would they be comforted by the oft-repeated reminder, “The Lord will
provide.”
The reason for so brief a tour is probably to be sought in the political
situation. In every direction the horizon looked dark. The year 1851 was
disastrous for the whole of South Africa. The Cape Colony had just been
plunged into the Eighth Kaffir War—the longest, most sanguinary and most
costly of its conflicts with the natives. Widespread unrest prevailed
among native tribes in all parts of the country. The question of a
boundary between the Basuto and their white neighbours was as far as
ever from satisfactory settlement.
Matters wore indeed so threatening an aspect, that the British Resident
felt himself compelled to summon all able bodied burghers to
Bloemfontein for a punitive expedition against the Basuto chief.
The Boers of the Sovereignty, who believed that Major Warden would have
been better advised to leave the native chiefs severely alone, and allow
them to compose their own quarrels, made but a feeble response. Not more
than 150 of the men who had been commandeered appeared upon the stated
day. With these and 160 soldiers stationed at Bloemfontein, Major Warden
proceeded towards Basutoland, being reinforced along the road by various
native levies, numbering upwards of one thousand. At Viervoet, a
mountain near the mission station of Mekuatling, this force sustained a
humiliating defeat at the hands of the Basuto, and its scattered
remnants were compelled to fall back upon Bloemfontein (30th June.
1851).
All efforts on the part of Major Warden to restore the prestige of the
British name and British arms were without avail. The Boers could not be
prevailed upon to form another commando and invite further defeats. The
position in which the British Resident now found himself was unenviable
in the extreme. Called to police a country as large as England, he found
his authority practically limited by the bounds of the Bloemfontein
commonage.
At this juncture the Boers in the Sovereignty who were still disaffected
towards British rule, resolved upon a step which bordered on rebellion,
and in less troublous times would certainly have been construed as such.
They invited Andries Pretorius, still under sentence of outlawry, to
cross the Vaal River and take upon himself the office of pacificator of
the Sovereignty. They then proceeded to Moshesh, and on the 3rd
September, 1851, concluded an agreement with him, by which he bound
himself to leave the Boers and their possessions in peace, while they on
their part promised to refrain from interference in tribal quarrels.
This sudden denouement in the political situation caused great
excitement in Bloemfontein. Murray writes to his brother thereanent in
the following terms—
Quite early on Saturday morning (27th September) Major Warden sent Mr.
Allison 1 over to me to show me a letter from Andries Pretorius to the
British Resident, informing him that he had been invited by Moshesh and
the white inhabitants of the Sovereignty to come and act as mediator,
and that he intended coming with nothing but the most peaceable
intentions. The Maj or informed me of this because he wished to remove
the 150 troops now at Winburg to this place, and wished me to assist him
in getting waggons to bring Mr. van Velden also hither. As the removal
of the troops would be the signal for general confusion, I went and
urged the Major to leave the troops there. This matter is now not quite
decided. I also saw two Boers, Linde and Vermaak,® who had been at
Moshesh’s, and they gave me information about tbe state of matters at
Winburg which amazed and distressed me. When they were at Moshesh’s
there were some Boers begging the chief for a commando of Caffres to
waylay and attack the troops who were on their way from Natal to this.
You are aware that the more rebellious Boers have been instigating
Molitzani to steal all the cattle of the adherents of the Government in
Winburg district: they have been marked men. Those who are known as
maatschappij men (men of the society) have had nothing stolen, or else
everything returned as soon as they applied to Molitzani. Sikonyella,
again, is the ally of the Government, and he has now begun stealing from
the friends of Pretorius, who, of course, affirm that this is at the
instigation of the Wessels’ and the Government people. A sad state of
things truly!
Those farmers whose cattle have been stolen by Sikonyella have appealed
to Andries Pretorius, together with large numbers of those in the
Winburg district who are in any way dissatisfied with the Government. I
believe that they sent on five different occasions to fetch him, but he
has always refused. They have at length persuaded him to come. The
consequence will be that he will so far mix himself with the enemies of
the Government, that he will be obliged to assume a hostile position
towards it, and will thus ensure vengeance on himself and his people. I
do believe the man honestly intends to be a peacemaker. I see, however,
that the rebel party on this side of the river have been flattering his
ambition with the hope of getting a name if he succeed in acting as
mediator.
But you will perhaps think that all this need not have excited me so
much. I have, however, to tell you something more. I have resolved to go
to the Vaal River, and try and get Pretorius to stay there. Do not think
the matter a hasty resolution. I have thought and prayed much over it,
and it appears my duty to try now to prevent what may be the cause of
much bloodshed. The thought struck me on Saturday morning : what I heard
from Linde and Vermaak made me doubt, and it was only this morning that
I was able to decide. I was far from well yesterday. It will be very
difficult to get horses; and I trust that my plans may in mercy be
thwarted, if it be not the Lord’s will that I go. I feel the want of a
friend on whose advice I can depend. Mr. Stuart is the only one, and he
of course urges me to go.
The way was, however, opened, and Murray left for Mooi River, probably
on the day following the writing of the above letter. A certain Adolph
Coqui, a shopkeeper of Jewish-Belgian extraction, who was on his way
thither, kindly gave Murray a seat in his cart; and thus journeying,
with frequent detentions owing to heavy rain, he reached Potchefstroom
on Saturday the 4th October. His mediation had the desired effect.
Pretorius relinquished the idea of interfering in the affairs of the
Sovereignty, and the disturbances which would have resulted from such a
step were happily averted.
On that same day, and probably with Murray’s assistance, Pretorius
addressed an important communication to Major Warden, expressing the
desire of the Vaal River emigrants to enter into a lasting treaty of
peace with the British Government. To this note the British Resident
sent an amicable reply, stating that it lay beyond his province to
arrange such a treaty as Pretorius proposed, but affirming his readiness
to transmit to the High Commissioner any suggestions which the Boer
leader might make. The British Government had by this time arrived at
the tardy conclusion that it was futile work seeking to impose its rule
over people who would have none of it. These views were shared by Sir
Harry Smith, who accordingly appointed two Assistant Commissioners,
Messrs. Hogge and Owen, to proceed to the Sovereignty, armed with large
powers to settle matters generally.
The Commissioners reached Bloemfontein towards the close of 1851. One of
their first acts was to issue a proclamation in the name of the High
Commissioner, rescinding the sentence of outlawry passed on Pretorius,
and withdrawing the offer of rewards for the apprehension of his
proscribed followers. On the 3rd January, 1852, Murray writes—
The Commissioners have thought fit to take a good deal of my opinions on
Transvaal matters, as well as on the state of things generally, and thus
I often have an hour’s conversation with Major Hogge. You are aware that
Pretorius has been pardoned. On the 16th instant it is intended to have
a meeting a little beyond Sand River, for the Commissioners to receive
twelve delegates from beyond the Vaal River. Major Hogge has requested
me to be there to act as translator, as it is of consequence that they
should have someone they understand well. I shall very likely go, as I
feel that they might break upon some insignificant point, which a very
little explanation might rectify.
From a letter to his brother it appears that Murray was able to carry
out his intention to be present at this historical conference, at which
the Transvaal people secured the acknowledgment of their independence.
He left Bloemfontein on the 12th January, accompanied by his sister
Maria, who, however, remained at Winburg while her brother proceeded on
the further journey. There is, unfortunately, no extant account of his
experiences and impressions at the conference. Suffice it to say that
the meeting took place as arranged on the 16th January, and on the
following day was signed the Sand River Convention, by which the British
Government “ guaranteed to the emigrant farmers beyond the Vaal River
the right to manage their own affairs, and to govern themselves
according to their own laws, without any interference on the part of the
British Government.” Thus closed an important chapter in the history of
the Boer people, in which Murray played no insignificant part.
During the year 1852 there were two events in Murray’s career which
stand out as of more than ordinary importance, his fourth visitation
tour to the Transvaal, and his visit to Cape Town in order to attend the
quinquennial2 meeting of the Church Synod. In the fourth tour to the
north he covered more ground than on any previous occasion, his absence
from Bloemfontein lasting just three months, from the ist March to the
3rd June. He was accompanied by his friend J. H. Neethling, minister of
Prince Albert, whose companionship was a great relief to the inevitable
monotony of ox-waggon travel, and to whose graphic pen we owe a very
full description of the scenes and experiences they passed through. The
route which they followed may be briefly described. Following the usual
custom, they made directly for the village of Potchefstroom, on Mooi
River ; then travelled eastwards to the Suikerbosch Rand, where the town
of Heidelberg now stands; and from there journeyed in north-easterly
direction to Lyden-burg. This was the course of Murray’s second tour,
from which, however, they now proceeded to diverge. Bearing north for
several days, they reached at length the most northerly settlement of
whites then established in South Africa, that of the Potgieter party, in
the Zoutpansbergen. From here they turned back, and travelling via the
Warm Bath reached Rustenburg in the Magaliesberg Range; thence to the
Morikwa (Marico) where the village of Zeerust has since arisen ; and
from the Morikwa via Schoonspruit (now Klerksdorp) back to the Vaal
River.
From the most interesting account of this extensive tour, across the
length and breadth of the Transvaal, which Mr. Neethling has left us, we
can make only a few extracts. The detention at Mooi River gives him the
opportunity of offering us a vivid picture of what a religious gathering
of Boers was like in by-gone days—
In the morning at 9 o’clock the congregation was assembled in the
church—a building which is able to contain, in my estimation, some six
hundred people. Every bit of space was occupied. The smallest empty spot
was always large enough for a veldstoeltje, and no one objected to a
little discomfort in the seating arrangements. With the exception of a
wailing infant here and there, nothing disturbed the attention of the
audience. The singing was powerful, the prayers unanimous. Every eye
during the sermon was fixed upon the speaker; many a countenance bore
witness to the most earnest attention. My brother’s preaching was
simple, warm and sincere. The congregation understood him—that was
plainly to be read in their faces.
At the close of the service each one takes up his veldstoeltje, places
it under his arm, and proceeds to his tent. At the close of the series
of services on Monday, the tents are quickly taken down, and within a
brief space the last of the large number of waggons has borne its living
freight away homewards. At one of the services ninety-seven children
were baptized. By the carefulness of the churchwardens all the
arrangements were carried out with an order and regularity which
surpassed expectations. Very touchiifg did I find it when a couple of
children presented their baptismal papers themselves. I cannot forget'
the innocence which the face of one of them revealed. He was a blond
child of some four years old. When he had handed me the paper containing
his name, he closed his eyes, and awaited with sweet simplicity the
sprinkling of the baptismal water.
Neither on this nor on any previous tours did ministers of the Gospel
require to provide their own conveyances, or give themselves the least
concern regarding travelling arrangements. These were the care of
elders, deacons and friends generally. At no stage of the journey were
Murray and Neethling without journeying companions. Murray indeed
complains sometimes of the lack of privacy which he experienced. It was
counted an honour to escort these servants of God for a day, two days,
or even a week upon their journey. Beyond Suikerbosch Rand they had the
company of the Rodolf family, in their own waggon, “to whom,” writes
Neethling, “we owe heartiest thanks for a thousand kindnesses.”
Commandant Frans Joubert and Field-comet Nel accompanied them a two
days’ journey, as far as the ford of the Crocodile River, and displayed
the most intense anxiety lest they should heedlessly venture into the
unhealthy Zoutpansberg region. On leaving Rustenburg, at a later date,
they had as guide and escort, Field-comet Paul Kmger, who in after years
rose to eminence as President of the Transvaal Republic.
The start from Mooi River, and their further experiences on the road to
Lydenburg, are thus described by Neethling—
Eight active oxen stand yoked before the waggon, and the journey in
Transvaal territory commences. The immeasurable veld stretched before
us. Zoutpansberg, the furthest point at which the courageous South
African has ventured to settle, was the remotest place to which we
desired to bear the seed of God’s Word. But what a distance ! Four weeks
of almost incessant travel—of travel such as the ministers of our Church
alone can compass, aided by the love of the congregation, with constant
and rapid progress. I knew nothing of the country through which our
journey lay. I knew only that we would sometimes travel for a whole week
through territory quite uninhabited, or inhabited by Cafires only. I
heard the valorous Boer make mention, with a show of respect, of the
lion, which he sometimes calls the vuilbaard (dirty beard), but to which
he cannot deny the crowning virtue of bravery. Not infrequently I
listened to stories about the fierceness of the buffalo and the
ill-temper of the rhinoceros, and those places were carefully described
where animals like these would prove a menace to our journey. Then again
I heard of an evil to be still more dreaded —the yellow fever, which
demands the extremest circumspection.
After a wearying day’s journey we enjoyed many an hour of quiet rest,
sitting around a bright and steady fire, or lying lengthwise in the soft
grass. Each of our journeying companions knows what he has to do. The
“sexton” at night time hands us the Book, and we express in brief
devotions the gratitude which we feel towards God for His continual
care. Thereafter I many an evening still lay talking to our fellow-travellers
about hunting experiences and hair-breadth escapes ; and their
narratives frequently gave me cause to marvel at the courage, strength
and activity of the Dutch-African race, and as frequently to praise the
love and goodness of a protecting God.
Our journey was rendered both speedy and pleasant by the great kindness
of those farmers who dwelt along the road. This kindness must have been
very noticeable, for it drew the attention even of April, the native who
leads our oxen. I see him yet, sitting at the fireside, where I fell
into conversation with him. Seated on the ground with his chin resting
on his knees, he regarded us fixedly for a long time, and then remarked,
in his broken Dutch, that we must surely be very great chiefs, since he
everywhere observed the Boer bazen (masters) remove their hats', and
invite us to enter their dwellings. Yes, long before we had arrived, a
new span of oxen was already collected in the kraal, and as soon as we
approached they were yoked to the waggon, and the master called out
April, loop! (April, hasten!) The natives can find no explanation of
this eager politeness, than on the supposition that we are great chiefs.
The respect shown to us as preachers of the Gospel makes an equally deep
impression on the natives. On a former occasion my friend [i.e. Andrew
Murray] was conducting services in this vicinity. A Cafire, who was no
longer a stranger to the customs of white folk, observed him narrowly
while preaching. Now, as everyone knows, my friend is not the quietest
of preachers. The native understood not a single word, but recorded his
impression of the scene in these words: "I never thought that the white
men stood in such dread of their chiefs. Look at the young chief yonder
(i.e. Murray). He points his finger at the people : they sit quiet. He
threatens them : they sit quiet still. He storms and rages at them: they
sit as quiet as death!”
In the northern and eastern portions of the Transvaal, which are quite
cool and healthy during the dry winter months, malarial fever is
exceedingly prevalent after the tropical summer rains. Even under modern
conditions, when the prophylactic properties of quinine are known and
utilized to the full, malaria claims many victims, and in those early
[years the ravages of the disease were extremely severe. Such was the
case in 1852. It was a deadly year, especially for those emigrants who
had settled in the low-lying parts, and were shut in by lofty mountains.
Murray had faithfully promised to visit the small community of trekkers
who owned Potgieter as leader, and who had established themselves on the
southern slopes of the Zoutpansberg Range. But the news spread
southwards that the Potgieter party was suffering from repeated attacks
of fever, and that several individuals had already succumbed. The young
ministers were strongly advised not to adventure themselves into such
unhealthy regions. They pointed out, however, that word had already been
passed and arrangements made, and that they therefore felt bound to
continue their journey. Their anxious friends then stipulated that,
should the Zoutpansberg people fail to meet them, as arranged at the
ford of the Crocodile River, or should it appear that the disease was
still spreading, the travellers were not to proceed further northwards.
To this stipulation Murray and Neethling agreed. But waggons and oxen
were found waiting for them at the tryst, the malady appeared to be
abating, and those sent to fetch them evinced such eagerness that, even
had they desired to turn back, the pathetic condition, of the stricken
community would have beckoned them forward.
After travelling almost uninterruptedly for eleven days from Lydenburg,
they reached the Zoutpansbergen on the gth April, and were received with
every manifestation of joy. The little band of emigrants had sustained
heavy losses. Out of 150 souls, all told, twenty-four had fallen before
the dread disease, and of these no less than eighteen were cut off
within a fortnight. There was no home which was not plunged in mourning;
and this circumstance, together with the fact that the majority of these
isolated people had been without the ordinances of religion for many
years, contributed to make the visit of the two pastors a solemn and
searching time. “For the poor people of Zoutpansberg,” writes Murray,
"it was a veritable feast, the very children rejoicing at they hardly
knew what. Nine waggons accompanied us to the lager, and on arrival we
found other fifty standing there. The knowledge of the candidates for
membership was very considerable, and out of forty applicants
twenty-four were accepted. Three children brought for baptism were over
the age prescribed by Church law—two were nine years old, and one was
thirteen—but forty were admitted to the solemn rite. We did not dispense
the Lord’s Supper, on account of the state in which many of the people
live, though I must confess that I was agreeably disappointed in not
finding them so careless as was represented.” At Murray’s suggestion the
congregation, having assembled on a certain evening for the purpose,
followed a well-known apostolic precedent, and “ selected elders by show
of hands.”1 After thus providing the community with (ruling) bishops and
leaders, and commending them to the grace of God, the two travellers
bade their friends farewell and turned their faces southwards.
In the course of the return journey they met, at the Warm Bath,
Commandant Potgieter himself, who was there seeking rest and restoration
from the malady to which, in less than a twelvemonth, he was to fall a
victim. Murray describes him as “a very venerable-looking old mail,” and
[Neethling’s picture is, "a man of tall stature and venerable
countenance, wholly built to be a commander, though now somewhat bent
under the weight of years and increasing physical weakness.” Potgieter
professed his profound gratitude that God had at length answered his
petitions, and had made possible this pastoral visit to his poor
neglected people in the north.
From the full records of this tour we make but one more abbreviated
extract. It is from a letter of Murray’s, describing their experiences
in the Magaliesbergen. To his sister Maria.
On Friday [30th April] we entered the lower part of the Magaliesberg
country, and though travelling through the least populated portion we
soon found sad traces of the sickness. In a small patch of country
behind the Mountain some thirty people had been carried off, and there
were still a great many ill. I found many very deeply impressed under
the chastening hand of God. We remained at Rustenburg for more than a
week. After preaching thrice on Sabbath, we held services twice every
week-day—once in the early morning and once in the evening. As John
Neethling took the catechumens, I expected to have plenty of free time
for myself. I was, however, disappointed. The continual friendly calls
of the people, and regular visits to seven or eight sick folk, kept me
uninterruptedly occupied. There were also several cases of people in
apparent anxiety of soul, but groping in great darkness; and I felt it a
privilege to have so much occasion for offering Jesus to individuals,
although the evening often found me thoroughly worn out.
Two or three cases really refreshed me. One was that of a young woman
who had lost her father and two of her little ones, and had herself been
lying upon a long and painful sick-bed. The exceeding simplicity of her
faith, and her childlike language with respect to death and heaven,
edified me greatly. Another case was that of a young man whom I rode
some eighteen miles to see. I found him seeking and apparently anxious.
I tried especially to enforce the truth that Christ is ours by gift;
that we have but to accept, to believe “He is mine,” and we are saved.
After prayer I bade him good-bye, as we intended leaving very early next
morning. In the evening he sent for me, and on my arrival said that he
wished simply to say that he had found Christ. With great emphasis he
repeated the words, "God has given Christ to me: I have found my Saviour.”
He then expressed the wish to depart and to be delivered from this world
of sin. When I last heard of him he was still living, but very weak.
At Mooi River I had to perform the painful duty of visiting a criminal,
Pieterse, under sentence of death for murdering a neighbour. He has been
sentenced after a trial by jury, and the sentence only waits for the
confirmation of the Volksraad to be executed. Poor man, he appeared to
deceive himself with some hope of pardon as a ground for postponing
conversion.
The case referred to in the last paragraph is one of the most remarkable
in the annals of justice in South Africa. Mr. Jacobus Stuart, who as
one-time Secretary of the Volksraad had every means of knowing the
facts, tells us that Pieterse had, in a bout of drunken frenzy, murdered
his nephew Oosthui-zen. Seized with remorse, he had voluntarily
surrendered himself to the Landdrost of Potchefstroom. This official,
calling together his fellow-councillors forming the Heemraden,
instituted a careful trial and found Pieterse guilty of murder. Sentence
of death could by the law of the land only be passed by the Volksraad,
and to this body the case was accordingly referred. What could they do?
Drunkenness and subsequent remorse were mitigating circumstances, but
they could not grant release from the divine law, “Whoso sheddeth man’s
blood, by man shall his blood be shed.” The Volksraad therefore passed
the death sentence. But who would carry it into execution? A gallows did
not exist in the whole land. To entrust the execution of the sentence to
an Englishman was undesirable, to entrust it to a native was impossible.
The Field-cornets met together and decided that, as they were
responsible for the maintenance of law and order, the execution of the
condemned man was their duty. Lots were cast and three men were thus
chosen to perform the dread act. Troops of friends visited Pieterse in
his cell, to mourn with him, to comfort him and to pray for him. On the
appointed day he took a friendly farewell of his judges, and it was a
friend’s hand that inflicted upon him the last penalty of the law.
Murray returned to Bloemfontein in the beginning of June, 1852. Little
though he thought it, this was the last pastoral visit he was destined
to pay to the congregations across the Vaal River. By a singular
conjunction of circumstances the ties which bound him to the Transvaal
people were suddenly and finally severed. In describing briefly these
circumstances it is necessary to anticipate somewhat the true order of
events, but the reasons which henceforth barred Murray’s way to the
north are best set forth at this stage.
In the month of November, 1852, there landed in South Africa a man who
was to play a remarkable part in the ecclesiastical history of the
Transvaal. This was the Rev. Dirk van der Hoff, a Hollander, who at the
instance of a certain Professor1 Lauts came to South Africa with the
definite object of ministering to the pastorless voortrekkers. A few
weeks before his arrival the Synod of the D. R. Church was in session at
Cape Town. On hearing that a young minister was shortly expected, to
labour among the emigrants, the Synod pointed out that Professor Lauts
held no authority to appoint ministers for the D. R. Church of South
Africa, and that Mr. van der Hoff, before he could be recognized as
pastor of Potchefstroom (or any other charge), would have to conform to
the rules and regulations of the D. R. Church. The attention of van der
Hoff was specially directed to two conditions upon which alone his
appointment could be considered valid—he must, by signing the
formularies of the D.jR. Church, indicate his adhesion to the doctrines
which the Church held, and thus receive “legitimation” (as the technical
expression runs), and he must have been regularly invited to
Potchefstroom by a formal “letter of call” from the consistory of the
congregation. These conditions van der Hoff, on his arrival, fulfilled,
so that the call could be duly sustained.
It was near the end of May, 1853, before van der Hoff reached his
destination. According to Presbyterian Church law a minister’s connexion
with his congregation takes effect from the date of his being formally
inducted or introduced by the brother minister who has been acting as
pastor of the vacant congregation, and who in the D. R. Church is known
as the consulent. Andrew Murray, who had visited Potchef-stroom on four
different occasions, and who therefore stood towards that congregation
in every sense in loco pastoris, was the acknowledged consulent of
Potchefstroom. On him therefore devolved the duty of inducting van der
Hoff, and the date for that ceremony was provisionally fixed for the
31st July,1853.
On the 15th June preceding, van der Hoff addressed the following letter
to Murray—
I have to-day received a communication from the Landdrost and Heemraden
of this congregation, in which I am informed that the joint Krijgsmad
(War Council) has resolved, together with two members of the Volksraad,
Messrs. S. Krieger and M. H. Pretorius, and at the earnest request of
Elder Snyman of Rustenburg, “ to call together a general assembly on the
second Monday of August, in order to discuss the question of Rev. van
der Hoff’s induction.” They have also requested the Volksraad to hold
its session at the same time, and have invited all consistories and all
sensible people who are interested in the matter. On account of this
action we request Your Reverence to postpone your visit somewhat longer.
We can imagine the amazement with which Murray, who had some inkling of
what was going on behind the scenes, perused this document. The
congregations in the Transvaal had been regarded from the first as
forming part of the D. R. Church of Cape Colony; the ordinances of
religion had been administered to them by clergymen of that Church; they
had presented a practically unanimous call to a minister of that Church,
Murray himself; at their own request they had recently been incorporated
by Synodical decision (21st October, 1852) into the D. R. Church; their
minister designate, Mr. van der Hoff, had just solemnly signified his
assent to the doctrines and promised obedience to the laws of the said
Church —and here were congregations and people preparing to cut the
bonds which united them to the Church of their fathers.
At Rustenburg, on the 8th August, 1852, the Volksraad and the General
Assembly, in separate session, arrived at resolutions of similar import,
namely to sever their connexion with the D. R. Church of the Cape. The
reasons adduced were two only: "(i) The conditions, or promises, of
supplying us with ministers have not been fulfilled ; and (2) We cannot
submit to the ecclesiastical laws of the D. R. Church of South Africa.”
In this manner arose the separatist body known as “de Nederduitsch
Hervormde Kerk” of the Transvaal, so named in contradistinction to the
historical Church from which it had broken away, viz. “ de Nederduitsch
Gereformeerde Kerk ”—both titles being precisely equivalent to “ the
Dutch Reformed Church.”
Whether van der Hoff was ever legally inducted is doubtful. The question
gave rise to considerable friction and heartburning, as the following
letter testifies—
Potchefstroom, 8th September, 1853.
To the Rev. D. van Velden,
Winburg.
Rev. Sir,—A rumour is in circulation among us that you have said, in the
presence of several individuals, that Mr. van der Hofi, minister here,
must be inducted by Mr. Murray or yourself, and that, if no intimation
as to the date of such induction were received from this side, Your
Reverence would not leave it at that, but would come hither, uninvited,
with Rev. Murray, and then would like to see if the induction would not
be held. Now though we give no credence to those rumours, it might occur
that Your Reverence (either alone or accompanied by Rev. Murray) could
come hither with the aforesaid purpose, namely the induction of Rev. van
der Hofi, minister here; and it is on this account that we must advise
you to refrain from such a journey, which will be in vain, since the
highest Church body and the highest political authority in these
territories have decided that the induction shall not take place. The
Rev. van der Hofi being a legally ordained minister of the Dutch
Reformed Church (" Nederduitsch Gereformeerde Kerk ’’), his presentation
or induction is unnecessary. .
[Signed by] A. Smit,
G. V. Schoeman,
H. H. Lombard, Landdrost.
To this missive Mr. van Velden sent the following reply1—
Winburg, 14th September, 1853.
Dear Friends,—Your communication of the 8th inst. reached me the day
before yesterday, and I would have replied by return post, but was
prevented through being occupied all day with the examination of young
people for confirmation.
In answer I must say that I was extremely surprised to see that you give
response to what you do not believe. You speak of rumours. Well, of that
there is no lack, and the most singular and extraordinary rumours
frequently course through the country. To that category belongs also the
rumour of which you make mention in your letter. You acted wisely in not
giving credence to it, but your response to the same makes me fear that
a certain amount of credence has nevertheless disturbed your minds. This
makes me hasten to set you at ease.
With reference to the visit of my brother Murray, whom I saw recently, I
do not believe that His Rev*, has the least intention of again visiting
you. Your fear of such a visit I therefore believe to be quite
groundless. It is true, he intended coming, because the congregations
across the Vaal having made earnest application to belong (with the
other congregations) to the Synod of our Church, brothers Murray and
Neethling had secured the consent of the Synod to your application. Your
congregations accordingly were added to the Presbytery of Trans-gariep
(Trans-orange), and the Rev. A. Murray, as consulent of the Transvaal
congregations, was to have inducted your minister. The information you
now impart excites my astonishment. You have decided that your minister
is not to be inducted, because His Reverence is a legally ordained
minister of the Dutch Reformed Church. Very good. But are you not aware
that in Holland every minister, even though he be already ordained, must
nevertheless be presented by the consulent to every congregation in
which he desires to labour ? Are you not aware that the same procedure
has always been followed, and still obtains, in our D. R. Church in
South Africa ?
So far as I am concerned, if I had been appointed as your minister, I
would have acted as I actually did on coming to Winburg—I would have
confined myself to preaching, and would have postponed the
administration of the Sacraments until such time as I had been duly
presented or inducted by the consulent of the congregation. For all
that, when I arrived in South Africa I had already been eight years
ordained. In your letter you speak of two bodies which are wholly
unknown to me. First, you mention the highest Church Body. Now,
I know of no higher ecclesiastical authority among you than the
consistories of the various congregations. Presbytery or Synod does not,
so far as I know, exist across the Vaal. A very comfortable state, for
there is now no tribunal whatever to try either a minister, should he
transgress in doctrine or conduct, or a member of the consistory. And
yet the danger of such transgression is great already and will become
ever greater. In our days, too, we should remember Philippians iii.
Well, this is none of my business. If you wish for no ecclesiastical
tribunal other than one which has jurisdiction over members of the
congregation, but not over ministers and members of consistory, then I
can only hope that things will move smoothly among you. For my part I
desire, as honest man, as Christian, and as a servant of Him who will
have all things done decently and in order, an ecclesiastical tribunal
that there; may be a legal authority, in case any minister can be
convicted of false doctrine or evil conduct. An honourable and faithful
minister will never be afraid of such a tribunal. A minister who fears
it is not a man whom I can trust. Enough. You speak of your highest
Church Body. That Body decides as to the induction or non-induction of
your minister, and your minister acquiesces—he who is himself chairman
and head of your only Church Body, the consistory. Truly, I am not able
to understand that. I shall place it in the category of things too high
and wonderful for me.
You make mention, in your communication, of another body— namely, the
highest political authority. What ! does political authority decide
ecclesiastical matters for you? Poor Church, that must bow beneath the
world. The Gospel of my Saviour does indeed teach me to reverence the
powers that are ordained of God, and I desire to pray for them ; but the
same Gospel forbids me absolutely to permit the Church of Christ to
cringe to the world or worldly authority. That Church is free under her
Head and King. That Church is exalted far above the world and the
authority which the world wields. So far as I am concerned (in this
matter I cannot speak for Brother Murray—he is well able to do that for
himself), if I were consulent of your congregation, and had to come and
induct your minister, I would have vouchsafed not a syllable in reply to
a letter on ecclesiastical matters, in which your highest political
authority had intervened. Finally, I pray for you with all my soul that
the Lord of the Church would richly fill your country with orthodox,
faithful and God-fearing ministers, that under their guidance and their
instruction, sanctified to the heart by the Spirit of God, you may learn
greatly to esteem ministers like the never-to-be-forgotten Murray ; for
it is they whose case the Lord will judge. See I Thessalonians v. 12,13.
May the Lord in mercy shield you from the judgments which might overtake
you and your children because of the shameful abuse with which you have
visited the minister of Bloemfontein. May He richly endow you with the
spirit of humility, and of wise sagacity and circumspection, in order
that you may be preserved from actions which might result in eternal
detriment to yourselves and your poor descendants. Proverhs xii. 15 and
xix. 20.
I have the honour to subscribe myself,
Your obedient servant and friend,
D. van Velden, V.D.M.
Enough has been said on Murray’s relations towards the Transvaal
congregations to show that his was not the hand which severed the bonds
that united him closely to the people beyond the river. The schism was
due less to religious than to political motives. Ministers from Holland,
though strangers to the customs and the vernacular speech of South
Africa, were less objectionable to the Republicans than men of their own
country and their own tongue, who owed allegiance to the British flag.
Of this unsympathetic attitude towards ministers of the Cape Church the
Hollander element took full advantage. It is difficult to determine how
far the final decision to sever connexion with the Cape Synod was due to
the influence of van der Hoff, and how far it resulted from the
determination of the people themselves to achieve ecclesiastical as well
as political independence.
Two matters, however, are perfectly clear. The first is this, that if
the ecclesiastical schism was occasioned by political motives, it
occasioned in its turn prolonged political dissensions. The evidence for
this statement is unimpeachable. Dr. Theal, the South African historian,
says: “The resolution that the Church of the Republic should be
independent of the Synod of the Cape Colony was a question which divided
the people into two factions, and was discussed with as much bitterness
in 1857 as four years earlier. The ecclesiastical dispute brought on a
change in the political condition of the country.” That this change was
not for the better but for the worse is shown by the Transvaal
historian, Mr. F. Lion Cachet, who observes: "The Transvalers were
divided into two parties, not by questions of doctrine, but by a
question of Church government. The ecclesiastical schism had the effect
of both leading up to and hastening the political schism which followed
shortly after. Lydenburg, which in matters ecclesiastical had renewed
its connexion with the Cape Synod, was served by ministers who belonged
to that Synod ; while the minister [van der Hoff] who was salaried out
of the public funds and officially acknowledged by the Volksraad,
received his congS from the Lydenburg congregation. . . . The meetings
held did not always end peacefully. Excitement ran high, and the two
chief parties, as yet but loosely united, were led forward from
ecclesiastical to political disunion.”
Another point in this unhappy history stands out clearly. It is this,
that though van der Hoff may not have been primarily responsible for the
schism (as he always denied that he was), he nevertheless displayed the
greatest activity in spreading it. At the so-called “General Assembly”
at Rustenburg, which decided for separation from the Cape Synod, the
consistory of Lydenburg was unrepresented, and it refused at first to
identify itself with the separatist movement. Van der Hoff, however,
succeeded in persuading the Lydenburgers to believe that the Cape Synod
stood under the supervision of the British Government, that ministers of
the Cape Church were obliged to take an oath of allegiance to the Queen,
that Cape ecclesiastical law placed whites and blacks upon a footing of
equality, and that no modifications in the Church’s laws and regulations
would be granted to the congregations of the Transvaa ; and by these
arguments he prevailed upon them to cast off their allegiance to the
mother Church. But they soon repented of their ill-considered action,
presented the disingenuous van der Hoff with his discharge from the
office of consulent, and asked with much penitence to be re-admitted to
communion with the Cape Church. Their prayer was granted. The grievances
which van der Hoff had sought to create in their minds were shown to be
without foundation. They were presently incorporated in the Presbytery
of Transgariep (i.e. Orange River), and so re-united to the body from
which they had temporarily seceded. And in this manner was the D. R.
Church of South Africa re-established in the Transvaal territory, where
it has not merely maintained itself until this day, but has steadily
grown in numbers and influence, until now it holds the premier position
among ecclesiastical bodies north of the Vaal. |