"THAT marvellous country," says Froude of Scotland, "so
fertile in genius and in chivalry, so fertile in madness and crime, where
the highest heroism co-existed with preternatural ferocity, yet where the
vices were the vices of strength, and the one virtue of indomitable
courage was found alike in saint and sinner." The criminal records of
Scotland, especially those of Edinburgh, illustrate this quotation. They
are strange reading, with a horrible fascination of their own. Here are
two instances, the very pick of the bundle, united by no other bond than
that both are inexplicable to the verge of lunacy. The first is the case
of Major Weir, which had for admirable theatre the West Bow.
It is commonplace steps to-day, most of it, commonplace
dwellings, commonplace everything. How not to regret that old impressive
street, lined with great, tall, gloomy houses, set off by "roundles" and "pends,"
and wynds and closes, and like devices of old Scots architecture? Here for
the better part of two centuries stood one dismal
mansion marked by a striking turret, half in ruin and uninhabited, because
of the accursed shade of Major Weir. Even yet, R. L. S. assures us, "Old
Edinburgh cannot clear itself of his unholy memory," and that memory still
haunts the place, modern as it is. In the years that followed the
Restoration there was none of this evil tang. The West Bow was the chosen
abode of the strictest of the strict, the true blue upholders of the
Covenant. "Bow-head saint" was a cant term of the time. Among the saints
(temp. 1669) who so eminent a professor as
Major Thomas Weir? A reputable and well-known citizen, he lived in his
house there in peculiar strictness and sanctity. He was come of good
landed folk in the west, had risen to his rank in the army, and had been
appointed to the command of the City Guard. It was not a time of half
measures, but Weir’s treatment of such Royal prisoners as fell to his
charge was even then noted for its harshness. He had care of Montrose just
before his execution; he held him strait, he showered on him a wealth of
vituperative epithet. He was "dog, atheist, traitor, apostate,
excommunicate wretch." Even Weir had his gentler hour. He was much sought
after by those of his own sect; devout women
reverenced him as "angelical Thomas." "His
vast and tenacious memory" gave him complete command of fit scriptural
expression; his fluency was wonderful; his gift of extempore prayer was
the admiration of the elect; people came forty or fifty miles to hear him.
He refused to preach (that, quoth he, was the province of those specially
ordained), but he prayed "with great
liberty and melting," leaning on the top of his Staff, which might
well-nigh seem a part of himself. An impressive figure! A tall, thin man,
with lean and hungry look, big, prominent nose, severe, dark, gloomy
countenance, which grew yet more gloomy when one of the conforming
ministers crossed his path. Then, with expressive gesture, be would draw
his long black coat tighter about him, pull his steeple-hat over wrathful
brows, and turn away with audible words of contempt. And as he went his
Staff, with an indignant rat-tat, beat the stones of the street. That
Staff was to become in after years a terror to all Edinburgh; it was of
one piece, with a crooked head of thorn wood. When curiously examined
afterwards it was seen to have carved on it the grinning heads of satyrs.
And so, for many years, the Major lived on in the very odour of sanctity,
in his turreted house in the West Bow, with his sister Jean—or, as some
would have it, Grizel—Weir.
In 1670 the Major was
between seventy and seventy-six, and a
few quiet and safe years seemed his certain portion before he went to his
honoured rest. Presently Edinburgh was startled by the report that he had
confessed himself guilty of horrible and loathsome crimes, and had with
terrible cryings and roarings demanded condign punishment The affair
seemed so incredible that he was judged out of his senses—a theory still
in favour with sceptical inquirers of to-day. Sir James Ramsay, then
provost, sent physicians to report. His own sect also visited him, and a
horrid certainty gained ground that the confessions were substantially
true. The officers were ordered to secure him, and he and his sister, the
accomplice of his crimes, were presently safely lodged in the gloomy old
Tolbooth, which you will remember was a little way down the Lawnmarket,
just where it joins the High Street. His Staff was not forgotten; his
sister had implored the guards to keep it from his grip. Carefully looked
after, and gingerly handled, it was lodged in the Tolbooth as securely as
its master.
The town was in an uproar.
All sorts and conditions of men "flocked thither to see this monster and
discourse with him upon his horrible crimes," and the attitude of the
prisoner was such as to increase the morbid interest and excitement to the
highest pitch. All he said but whetted a curiosity that could not be
satisfied. "Had he seen the Devil?" eagerly demanded a certain honest
divine, named John Sinclair. "He had felt him in the dark!" was the
mysterious reply. To another ghostly adviser he asserted, "that Satan had
appeared in the shape of a beautiful woman." He went so far as to describe
the very scene of his crimes. It was a spot in Fife, and the curious
preacher rushed off to inspect. "No grass grew there," was his quite tame
report. Indeed, to ears prepared for blood-curdling horrors, nothing could
be less satisfying. He refused to confess or be absolved. He roundly
declared "that he had sinned himself beyond all possibility of repentance,
that he was already damned." And to one of the city ministers who
persistently urged him ‘he responded: "Trouble me no more with your
beseeching me to repent, for I know my sentence of damnation is already
sealed in heaven, and I feel myself so hardened within that if I might
obtain pardon of God and all the glories in heaven for a single wish that
I had not committed the sins with the sense whereof I am so prevented, yet
I could not prevail myself to make that single wish." And again, "I find
nothing within me but blackness and darkness, brimstone and burning to the
bottom of hell." Here and elsewhere we seem to hear the wailing of a lost
soul. The stern Calvinist accepts with a certain terrible fortitude his
place among the souls elected to perdition. Yet one officious divine was
not to be denied, he was deaf to every refusal. "Sir, I will pray for you
in spite of your teeth and the devil your master too." Weir needs must
listen in gloomy silence.
The accused were tried on 9th April 1670 before two
Judges of Commission, a Court specially constituted, it would seem, for
the purpose. Sir John Nisbet of Dirleton, the Lord Advocate, prosecuted.
His task was an easy one, for brother and sister were indicted together
and both admitted their guilt. It is impossible to reproduce here the
records, or even to name the charges, though the English law of yesterday
would have taken cognizance of but one of them. Weir was not directly
accused of any dealings with the powers of darkness. There is only an
incidental reference to the supernatural in the accusation. Of such trials
the end in any event was a foregone conclusion. Both were adjudged guilty
and Weir was ordered to be strangled at the stake on the Gallowlee,
between Edinburgh and Leith, on the Monday following—the 11th April. The
Edinburgh mob had an extensive and peculiar acquaintance with every
judicial atrocity, but never had the most regular attendant at the ghastly
spectacles such a feast of morbid horrors. Weir was stubborn to the last.
"When the roap was about his neck to prepare him for the fire, he was bid
say ‘Lord be merciful to me.’ ‘Let me alone, I will not. I have lived as a
beast, and I must die as a beast." It would appear the strangling, from
malice or accident, was ill done, but the curtain must fall on the scene.
The Staff was consumed in the fire with its master. It gave "rare
turnings, and was long in burning," so the curious observers noted.
His sister also was condemned to death. Besides being
an accomplice in her brother’s crimes, she was charged with consulting
witches, necromancers and devils; likewise she entertained a familiar
spirit at Dalkeith to spin for her enormous quantities of yarn. She was
softer metal than the other and confessed copiously. She had been
transported from Edinburgh to Musselburgh and back in a coach and six,
which "seemed all on fire," with much more to the same effect. The only
thing definite was the extraordinary quantity of yarn. She was wont in
prison, when earnestly solicited, to "put back her headdress, and seeming
to frown, there was an exact horseshoe shape for nails on her wrinkles,
terrible I assure you to the beholder." She was hanged in the Grassmarket
the day after her brother’s execution. Excitement and suffering had shaken
wits never of the strongest. On the ladder she groaned out a pious
commonplace of the time: "I see a great crowd of people come hither to-day
to behold a poor old miserable creature’s death, but I trow there will be
few among you who are weeping and mourning for a broken Covenant." She
tried to throw off her clothing that she might die with the greater shame.
Bailie Oliphant, the presiding city dignitary, much scandalized, ordered
the hangman to be quick about his work. This last roughness irritated the
poor patient, who roundly smacked his face. Thrown over, she got hold of a
rung of the ladder with one of her hands, and gruesomely protracted the
inevitable.
Weir’s epitaph was written in various fashion. "Thus
did the holy justice of God eminently shyne forth in detecting such
wretched hypocrites." Then a wild rumour arose in the west that the Major
had gone to Holland with money for the exiled brethren. The person burned
was not Weir, "but another wicked person bribed by wicked prelates and
curates to personate him." Out of China such personation were surely
impossible. The wits had, as was to be expected, many a scornful jibe at
the expense of the true blues, and then the noise died away. But popular
imagination set to work and touched the legend to srange issues. The
building was used as a brazier’s shop, and later as a magazine for lint,
but none would stay in it for the night. At midnight the house flashed
with light, sounds of ghostly revolt echoed within the deserted walls; the
noise of dancing and spinning incongruously mixed with howling fell on
your affrighted ears. Anon the Major would issue from the door, mount a
black horse without a head, and ride off in a game. Again a magic coach
and six, in grim parody of fashion, would call for him and his sister. The
magic Staff loomed ever larger, improving on its early record. It ran
messages, answered the door, acted as linkboy for the Major o’ dark nights
as he went about his unholy errands. Such are the fragments collected in
Chambers’s Traditions of Edinburgh,
first written in 1823. Long before this, somewhere about 1771 in fact,
Robert Fergusson had referred to the wizard in The
Ghaists: a Kirkyard Eclogue, whereof
the scene is the Old Grey-friars Churchyard. Watson’s Hospital, in the
course of their talk, says to Heriot’s:
"Sure Major Weir, or some sic warlock wight,
Has flung beguilin’ glances owre your sight."
You could not expect the masters of Scots romance to
leave the Major alone. In Scott’s Letters on Demonology
and Witchcraft the hum of the necromantic wheel and the
enchanted Staff parading through the gloomy ruins are commemorated as
traditions of his own youth, and he notes the house in 1830 as just being
pulled down, though James Grant affirms, in his Old and
New Edinburgh, that the last
relics were only removed as late as 1878. Indeed I have heard it suggested
that part of a wall actually remains as the western boundary of a house in
Riddle’s Court, which you may remember is at the east of the Bow Head, at
the upper end of the Lawnmarket. In "Wandering Willie’s Tale" in
Redgauntlet, the brief story that is the supreme
flower of Scott’s genius, the jackanapes that mocked the dying agonies of
its master, Sir Robert Redgauntlet, is called "
Major Weir, after the warlock that was burned." There is also the
horseshoe mark on Redgauntlet’s forehead. R. L. S. describes how his own
father had often heard the story, only half sceptical as to its falsehood,
in the nursery. It held such a place in the son’s memory that some rather
fancifully believe it influenced the name of the unfinished
Weir of Henniston. The legend of Major Weir is real essential
tragedy, more impressive when the "properties" of staff and spinning-wheel
and black art are brushed away, and the matter nakedly regarded as the
record of a human soul whelmed in storm and tempest.
I have said that Major Weir’s house abutted on Riddle’s
Court. Going eastward along that same south side of the Lawnmarket a step
or two brings you to Fisher’s Close, another step or two to Brodie’s
Close, so called after Deacon Brodie, the subject of my second criminal
portrait, he who repeated a century after Weir the strange drama of the
double life. His story is quaint and piquant. It is tragedy, for it ended
in his death on the scaffold, a disgrace to a highly respectable burgher
family; but it is altogether in a lighter vein.
There are strong dashes of comedy. The Deacon himself
had a pretty wit and a very sustained courage, and even if some was
bravado the very bravado required infinite pluck. The story in outline is
briefly this. Brodie was of a good Edinburgh family. His father was
Deacon, or bead, of the Incorporation of Wrights or Cabinet-makers. The
old man died in 1782, when the son was forty-one years old. He succeeded
to his father’s business. He was believed to have inherited £10,000 in
cash and considerable house property. He, like his father, was Deacon of
the Wrights. He was a marvellously good workman—an artist as we should
say. As Deacon of the Wrights, he was on the Town Council and had the best
Corporation work. Thus Brodie was to all appearance a reputable and
prosperous man; in fact he was given over to all the vices of Old
Edinburgh. Drinking and cock-fighting were not perhaps thought of as
vices, but he was a desperate and inveterate gambler in a low den in the
Fishmarket Close kept by one Clarke. He was not above the use of loaded
dice, and he kept two mistresses, each with a family. Jean Watt in
Libberton’s Wynd with her two children, and Ann Grant in Cant’s Close with
her three. His fortune was gone, and he was ever in want of fresh
supplies. He got in tow with a certain George Smith, an Englishman of ill
repute, and two others, Ainslie and Moore, completed the gang. A series of
burglaries of the most astonishing character was set on foot. The skill of
the Deacon as a craftsman, a certain simplicity about Old Edinburgh
arrangements, made every house in the city patent to those remarkable
rogues. The stories are numerous. A man has the Deacon to supper, shows
him out and retires to bed. He wakens in the middle of the night, a
burglar is in the room—his guest the Deacon! An old lady is at home o’
kirk time reading her Bible. A figure enters, robs her cabinet, and then
discovers he is not alone. Equal to the occasion he bows and retires with
his booty. Of course it is the Deacon, but neither lady nor gentleman can
believe their senses; at any rate they say nothing.
There came an end to such pranks. The gang at last
robbed the Excise Office in Chessel’s Court. They got a mere trifle, for
they were frightened from their booty by a curious alarm. It was a
Government office, the commotion was extreme. And then Moore peached, and
Smith and Ainslie, laid by the heels, made a clean breast of it. And
though the Deacon fled to London, and from thence to Holland, he was
unearthed and brought back. It is the most exciting story imaginable. You
will find it told at length by Mr William Roughead in his
Trial of Deacon Brodie (1906). And to the same source I must
refer for an account of the trial itself. It is only that of Brodie and
Smith; the Crown had accepted Ainslie and Moore as King’s evidence. To let
Ainslie go was really superfluous caution. The evidence was carefully got
up, and the thing as competently stage-managed then as it could be to-day.
Some of the technicalities strike you as ridiculous, but it was the "tune
o’ the time," or the time’s law, and at any rate made in favour of the
prisoners. The proof was crushing. Smith had elaborately confessed during
the examination, an interrogatory to which prisoners are subjected in
Scots and French procedure. That did away with him, and did far to do away
with Brodie. Then there was the testimony of Moore and Ainslie. There were
certain intercepted letters of Brodie which clearly amounted to a
confession, and all the minor details exactly fitted in. An alibi,
supported by the evidence of Matthew Sheriff, prisoner’s brother-in-law,
and Jean Watt, already mentioned, was attempted, but in vain. Henry
Erskine, Dean of Faculty, perhaps the most brilliant advocate that ever
pleaded at the Scots Bar, did all he could for Brodie. But what could he
do with such materials? John Clerk, afterwards Lord Eldin, tried what was
practically his ‘prentice hand on the defence of Smith. There were no less
than five judges on the bench, of whom Braxfield and Hailes are still
remembered. Clerk had violent quarrels with Braxfield. Mr Roughead thinks
his conduct of the case a mistake. I venture to hold otherwise. It was
perhaps just possible that by creating a scene he might have forced
Braxfield to put the case at once to the jury and snatched a preposterous
verdict through detestation of the judge, who even then was unpopular.
Braxfield, however, was too much for him. He finally allowed him to
finish. The court had sat from nine o’clock on Wednesday morning till six
o’clock on Thursday morning, and Braxfield then adjourned it for the
verdict till one o’clock. And this deliberation ruined any chance the
prisoners might have had. They were condemned to death, which they
suffered in due course after a reasonable interval of thirty-four days.
Brodie showed courage if not bravado to the last. The day before the end
he sung a stave from the Beggar’s Opera, made
some jesting remark to his companion in suffering the next morning. "It is
fortune de Ia guerre," quoth he, a scrap that
reminds one of like Gallic efforts of Robert Bums. He had, as wright to
the Corporation, done something to improve the apparatus by which he
suffered, yet the bolt did not work at the first or the second trial.
Between the acts, so to speak, Brodie came down and conversed coolly with
his friends. The third time the thing went and all was over. A desperate
attempt was presently made to resuscitate Brodie by bleeding and so forth,
but it failed. It is believed that an expectation of those attempts buoyed
up the Deacon in his last minutes. Popular tradition, that had kept alive
James after Flodden, and Major Weir after the fire on the Gallowlee, would
not let Brodie perish at the west end of the Tolbooth on the afternoon of
2nd October 1788. It was rumoured that no body was found in the grave to
which he had been in appearance consigned, and that he himself in the
flesh was afterwards encountered in Paris, that paradise of unholy joys to
every generation of Scotsmen. Brodie when he ended was forty-seven years
of age. A slender, small man, a cast in his eye that made him look like a
Jew, high, smooth forehead, ever carefully and precisely dressed—such is
the picture of him that remains. The peculiar piquancy of Brodie’s
position fascinates you to-day. It had an unholy attraction for himself.
The profits were small though useful, but the very idea
of outwitting all those grave and reverend people was inexpressibly
alluring. One has to recognize the criminal instinct as a fact of life.
The plot and the mystery of wrongdoing have their own independent
attraction for certain minds.
How far, you wonder, was the Deacon suspected? The
gossip that went on in those Old Edinburgh taverns, hour after hour, all
the night long, what did it say? One has a
horrible suspicion that the double life in some form or other was no
uncommon thing in Old Edinburgh, and that there was a general convention
of toleration and silence until some criminal or other committed the
unpardonable offence of being flagrantly found out. There are many
references in contemporary and later ephemera,
and there is one piece of literature with this for subject—the play
of Deacon Brodie, or the Double Life by
Henley and Stevenson. Very considerable liberties are taken with the
facts. Jean Watt is a graphic portrait of a lower-class Edinburgh woman of
the period, and R. L. S. never drew with a stronger and a surer hand. She
lives with the vitality given by Shakespeare or Scott. R. L. S. knew his
High Street closes and old world types not yet extinct, and the quite
mythical Bow Street Runner of W. E. H. is also superb. The problem of the
double life had always an attraction for Stevenson. The
Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is only another version
of the remarkable affair of Deacon Brodie. |