IN EDINBURGH, 1850-52 and
1854-55.
IN ST. ANDREWS, 1852-54.
His appearance—His
Studies—Many-sidedness—His Tutorship—His Fellow-students—Testimonies of
Dr. Wallace and Dr. Robertson.
Res non verba’ (Things not words). —Luthers
motto.
‘The artist is known by his
self-limitation.’—Tennyson.
‘Aien Aristeuein’
(Ever to be the best).—Motto
of St. Andrews University.
STEWART
matriculated first in the University of
Adversity. Serious financial losses constrained his father to quit his
farm about 1847, and begin life anew in Edinburgh on the old lines. James
manfully did his best to aid the family in their efforts, which proved
successful. During three or four years he had a business training, which
was very useful to him in after life when he had so much to do with
business and business men. His experiences during those strenuous days
would also deepen that keen sympathy with the struggling, which was a part
of his inheritance from father and mother. Such a strain, nobly borne,
would add strength to his unusual powers of resolve and self-reliance.
Like many Scottish students, he supported himself by private tutoring.
He did not enter the Edinburgh
University till his twentieth year. I have failed to glean any information
about his studies in Edinburgh, except that he did not take the classes in
the usual order, and that he was at the same time at business. After two
sessions there, his uncle, the Rev. Charles Stewart, died, and as James
was tutor to his cousins, he removed with his aunt to St. Andrews, his
ideal of a University town.
He then had that bearing of
distinction which remained with him through life. In face and form he
carried with him everywhere, to borrow Bacon’s phrase, ‘a letter of
perpetual recommendation.’ There was not about him a particle of
affectation. Broad-shouldered, uprIght as a palm, tall—he was six feet two
inches without his shoes and proportioned well—with a vigorous sweep and
stride, his frame seemed to be endowed equally with strength, agility, and
gracefulness. [The ‘portrait’ in this
and the following chapter is partly from personal knowledge, as during one
session I was a fellow-student with him, but chiefly from information
supplied by his fellow-students.] He had a
peculiar step, like that of a stag or a Red Indian hunter. I remember
vividly the first time I saw him, as he was striding across the college
quadrangle. I thought of Homer’s Ajax as he moved on the battlefield. He
attracted attention, and people would turn round and look at him after he
had passed in the street. Once seen, he was not likely to be forgotten or
mistaken for any other man. In respect of dress, the African natives might
justly have given him the title which they gave to his friend Coillard—’
the father of neatness.’ [On his
return to London from one of his African expeditions, he was walking in
the Strand, unconscious of the fact that he was still wearing his African
sun-helmet. A city Arab came alongside of him, and tried to keep step with
him. The odd procession arrested the attention of many, among whom was
another Arab, who stood gazing at the sun-tanned, travel-stained giant.
The boy by Stewart’s side, with upturned thumb, pointed over his shoulder
and shouted to his mate, in a tone of mock solemnity, ‘I say, George, he
grow’d.’ Stewart then discovered the reason why so many eyes were turned
to him, and disappeared in the nearest hatter’s shop. This was one of the
many diverting stories he told against himself. ]
One writes: ‘He changed less than
most men during his lifetime. Even in face and figure he continued very
much the man he was in those student days.’ Another writes: ‘His
appearance then recalled to me the words applied to the youthful David,
King of Israel—" He was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and
goodly to look to." Another thought, however, that he resembled King Saul
rather than David. ‘He was greatly beloved in his youth. There was
something extremely attractive in his whole demeanour, and there was a
vein of humour in his conversation which endeared him to us all.’
He had excellent intellectual gifts.
His was a nimble and vigorous mind that quickly reached the heart of a
subject. But he was not a distinguished student in the academic sense. The
lore of the University had no exclusive attractions for him. ‘Man lives
for culture,’ says Goethe, ‘not for what he can accomplish, but for what
can be accomplished in him.’ Stewart’s conception of culture was totally
opposed to that, while he was equally opposed to the pursuit of knowledge
for the sake of bread and butter. With him knowledge was an instrument and
a practical power, not a luxury or an adornment, and the crown of all
study was character and service.
Moreover, even when as a boy he
roamed with a gun over his father’s farm, his heart was set on Africa, and
during the whole of his student days he accepted the self-limitations
which such a sphere imposed. Often when expounding his favourite text,
‘Ethiopia shall soon stretch out her hands unto God,’ he used to emphasise
the difference between the Indian and the African, and to point out that
Ethiopia had no ancient and highly organised systems of caste and belief
to resist the solvent power of Christian truth. She was a simple,
untutored savage, who needed plain, practical teaching, and who was likely
to turn to God far Sooner than India would do. He thus valued a university
education only, or chiefly, in so far as it could fIt him for his chosen
sphere. He could not therefore live only or chiefly in the world of books,
as scholarship did not supply an adequate occupation for all his energies.
On the altar of Ethiopia he was
willing to offer up much which was precious to the prizeman.
He took then, and continued to take
through life, an eager interest in every department of knowledge. For some
time he was examiner in Mental Philosophy for the University of South
Africa, and his books reveal a wide range of study. He came early under
the spell of Science, and while a student wrote several articles for
magazines on semi-scientific themes, and was a member of the literary
societies. His interests were many-sided, and he eagerly gathered general
information. The whole palace of enchanted thought was open to him. He was
an enthusiastic student of Chemistry, Botany, Agriculture, and the common
ways of men. He thus matriculated and graduated in the larger university
of the World and Life. With him the Art of Arts was to live well and work
well.
His leanings then, as through life,
were decidedly conservative. This might be partly due to his revered
father and mother. He had characteristic enthusiasm of conviction, great
courage, and energy of statement. He was decidedly opposed to theoretical
voluntaryism in the relations between Church and State. No patience had he
with barren speculations, and he could not endure any theology which
tended to impoverish a man’s humanity.
His studies did not quench his
missionary zeal, for, at St. Andrews, he inoculated with it one of his
cousins and pupils, James Stewart, C.E., who resigned a lucrative post in
the Covenanted Service in India, that, at first as an unpaid volunteer, he
might aid the Livingstonia Mission. This Mr. Stewart laid out Blantyre,
and planned and made part of the Stevenson Road, the great highway of two
hundred and fifty-four miles between Lakes Nyasa and Tanganyika. He was a
most attractive Christian gentleman, and his early death was a great
bereavement to Central Africa.
Dr. George Wallace, lately of
Hamilton, a fellow-student with Stewart both at St. Andrews and Edinburgh,
thus writes about the St. Andrews days: ‘Clear and distinct above all
other impressions he made on me, was the practical cast of his mind. He
was a man of deeds, who valued only what could be embodied in actions. His
tastes were scientific rather than classical or mathematical. At that time
there was little in the university studies to interest and employ one
whose leanings were towards natural science. Hence, though his ability was
well marked in the classes attended by him, he never took the place in
them which he could easily have taken, if he had turned his whole energy
in that direction. It seemed as if the idea had taken possession of him
that the life for him was not one for which the university curriculum was
the best preparation. Even then it was manifest that he would not follow
the trodden ways of life, but would strike out some path for himself.’
Here is an appreciation of Stewart,
by another fellow-student at St. Andrews, the Rev. Dr. Robertson of
Whittinghame :—‘ Some of the careers of my fellow-students have been very
unexpected, some pathetic from the strange mingling in them of success and
failure. But of them all, I have often thought that the life of James
Stewart has been that by which the best and deepest mark has been made on
the world and its history. I could not have foretold this or anticipated
it during our college course. We are apt at that stage of our lives to put
undue value on the figure men make in class examinations. We do not yet
know how many other qualities are needed for effectiveness in life,
besides those by which college prizes are won. James Stewart was not a
winner of college prizes. He took only moderate and respectable positions
in his classes. This may have been due to his being considerably older
than most of us, less keen in regard to class competitions, and already
interested more in the work of life. He had no aloofness either from our
class studies, or from our student fellowships; but one felt that there
was much more in the man than was put into college study. There was a
constant strong purposefulness in his character. He was genial—even
humorous; a cheery smile generally on his countenance; but there was a
reserve of strength and courage, which, one feels now, waited for some
great occasions to call it forth. He was, first and foremost, a man of
action, rather than a student. While some of us plunged into our
class work as if it were all we had to think of, everything he did, was, I
believe, a conscious preparation for life. I recollect being struck by
large coloured drawings of botanical subjects he showed me—a study which,
I understood, he was carrying on privately in view of possibly choosing a
missionary career. Though he took no prominent place in his classes, we
felt him to be a natural leader of men. He was tall and strong of frame,
with fair hair, ruddy complexion, aquiline nose, and I never saw any one
to whom the epithet "eagle-eyed" more obviously belonged. One little
memory I have of him which is quite in character. We had a literary
society which met for some hours of debate and fellowship on Saturday
evenings. One wintry night, snow lay on the ground, and the streets were
icy. As we came downstairs at the end of our meeting the whisper went
round that students of a rival society had arranged to snowball us
severely and make it impossible for us to get out from the college court
by the narrow door under the old steeple. The enemy had indeed arranged
themselves all round outside, with piles of hard snowballs ready for use
at their feet. They were able to make it hot for those who came to the
doorway. There was a moment’s halt, and I well remember the voice ol James
Stewart sounding decisively in the dark, ‘Let every man provide himself
with two snowballs. We instantly charged, and sallying forth with him as
leader, in a few seconds of time had possessed ourselves of the heaps of
snowballs prepared by Our adversaries, and were pelting them as they fled.
‘I have fewer recollections of
Stewart then thar of some others of my fellow-students, As he lived with
his aunt, we did not haunt one another’s rooms and talk as students are
wont to do. At the end of our course in Arts we were separated. Those of
us who had associated intimately together, had the ministry in view as our
future profession. The larger number of us being of the Free Church, went
to study in the New College, Edinburgh, while the smaller number remained
at St. Andrews, and went through St Mary’s College under Principal
Tulloch. I regret the loss of that fellowship, which was a good and
helpful one. We were as a company the poorer for this break-up. And, so
separate are men kept in their careers by being in different church
organisations, we seldom met as years went on, and knew of one another’s
course of life only in a vague and irregular fashion. But such is the
linking together of free congenial souls in that magic time of college
life, such is the endurance of these early friendships, that any chance
meeting in all the life after finds us still the same to one another in
genial openness and frank affectionateness. I afterwards heard that Africa
had cast its spell upon James Stewart, or perhaps it should be said, that
he felt Africa to be the sphere of action for which he was fitted, that
from Africa came the call for such powers as he was conscious of—powers of
hardihood and endurance, with stern joy in committing himself to the toils
and hazards needed there for humanity’s sake. . . . I still think that of
all the men I knew in the United College at St. Andrews, he has made the
best and deepest mark on the world. Though he was preacher and doctor
both, I always thought of him rather with the kind of admiration with
which a home-staying student thinks of a soldier, an explorer, or man of
difficult affairs.’ |