When Henry of Lancaster placed himself on his cousin's throne, Scotland
was divided between the supporters of the Duke of Rothesay, the eldest
son of Robert III and heir to the crown, and the adherents of the Duke
of Albany, the brother of the old king. In 1399, Rothesay had just
succeeded his uncle as regent, and to him, as to Henry IV, there was a
strong temptation to acquire popularity by a spirited foreign policy.
The Scots hesitated to acknowledge Henry as King of England, and he, in
turn, seems to have resolved upon an invasion of Scotland as the first
military event of his reign. He, accordingly, raised the old claim of
homage, and marched into Scotland to demand the fealty of Robert III and
his barons. As usual, we find in Scotland some malcontents, who form an
English party. The leader of the English intrigue on this occasion was
the Scots Earl of March,[52] the son of Black Agnes.
The Duke of
Rothesay had been betrothed to the daughter of March, but had married
in February, 1399-1400, a daughter of the Earl of Douglas, the
hereditary foe of March. The Dunbar allegiance had always been doubtful,
and it was only the influence of the great countess that had brought it
to the patriotic side. In August, 1400, Henry marched into Scotland, and
besieged for three days the castle of Edinburgh, which was successfully
defended by the regent, while Albany was at the head of an army which
made no attempt to interfere with Henry's movements. Difficulties in
Wales now attracted Henry's attention, and he left Scotland without
having accomplished anything, and leaving the record of the mildest and
most merciful English invasion of Scotland. The necessities of his
position in England may explain his abstaining from spoiling religious
houses as his predecessors had done, but the chroniclers tell us that he
gave protection to every town that asked it. While Henry was suppressing
the Welsh revolt and negotiating with his Parliament, Albany and
Rothesay were struggling for the government of Scotland. Rothesay fell
from power in 1401, and in March, 1402, he died at Falkland.
Contemporary rumour and subsequent legend attributed his death to
Albany, and, as in the case of Richard II, the method of death was
supposed to be starvation.
Sir Walter has told the story in _The Fair
Maid of Perth_. Albany, who had succeeded him as regent or guardian,
made no effort to end the meaningless war with England, which went
fitfully on. An idiot mendicant, who was represented to be Richard II,
gave the Scots their first opportunity of supporting a pretender to the
English throne; but the pretence was too ridiculous to be seriously
maintained. The French refused to take any part in such a scheme, and
the pseudo-Richard served only to annoy Henry IV, and scarcely gave even
a semblance of significance to the war, which really degenerated into a
series of border raids, one of which was of unusual importance. Henry
had no intention of seriously prosecuting the claim of homage, and the
continuance of hostilities is really explained by the ill-will between
March and Douglas and the old feud between the Douglases and the
Percies. In June, 1402, the Scots were defeated in a skirmish at Nesbit
in Berwickshire (the scene of a small Scottish victory in 1355), and, in
the following September, occurred the disaster of Homildon Hill.
Douglas
and Murdoch Stewart, the eldest son of Albany, had collected a large
army, and the incursion was raised to the level of something like
national importance. They marched into England and took up a strong
position on Homildon Hill or Heugh. The Percies, under Northumberland
and Hotspur, sent against them a body of English archers, who easily
outranged the Scottish bowmen, and threw the army into confusion. Then
ensued, as at Dupplin and Halidon Hill, a simple massacre. Murdoch
Stewart and Douglas were taken captive with several other Scots lords.
Close on Homildon Hill followed the rebellion of the Percies, and the
result of the English victory at Homildon was merely to create a new
difficulty for Henry IV. The sudden nature of the Percy revolt is
indicated by the fact that, when Albany marched to relieve a Scottish
stronghold which they were besieging, he found that the enemy had
entered into an alliance with the House of Douglas, their ancient foes,
and were turning their arms against the English king. Percy and Douglas
fought together at Shrewsbury, while the Earl of March was in the ranks
of King Henry.
The battle of Shrewsbury was fought in July, 1403.
In 1405,Northumberland, a traitor for a second time, took refuge in
Scotland, and received a dubious protection from Albany, who was ready
to sell him should any opportunity arise. A truce which had been
arranged between Scotland and England expired in April, 1405, and the
two countries were technically in a state of war, although there were
no great military operations in progress.[53] In the spring of 1406,
Albany sent the heir to the Scottish throne, Prince James, to be
educated in France. The vessel in which he sailed was captured by the
English off Flamborough Head, and the prince was taken to Henry IV.
It
has been a tradition in Scotland that James was captured in time of
truce, and Wyntoun uses the
incident to point a moral with regard to
the natural deceitfulness of
the English heart:
"It is of
English nation The common kent conditionn
Of Truth the virtue to forget,
When they do them on
winning set, And of good faith reckless to be
When they do their advantage see."
But it would seem clear that the
truce had expired, and that the English
king was bound to no treaty of
peace. His son's capture was immediately
followed by the death of King
Robert III, who sank, broken-hearted, into
the grave. Albany continued
to rule, and maintained a series of truces
with England till his death
in 1420. The peace was occasionally broken
in intervals of truce, and
the advantage was usually on the side of the
Scots. In 1409 the Earl of
March returned to his allegiance and received
back his estates. In the
same year his son recovered Fast Castle (on St.
Abb's Head), and the
Scots also recovered Jedburgh.
Albany's attention was now diverted
by a danger threatened by the
Highland portion of the kingdom.
Scotland, south of Forth and Clyde,
along with the east coast up to the
Moray Firth, had been rapidly
affected by the English, French, and
Norman influences, of which we
have spoken.
The inhabitants of the more
remote Highland districts and
of the western isles had remained
uncorrupted by civilization of any
kind, and ever since the reign of
Malcolm Canmore there had been a
militant reaction against the changes
of St. Margaret and David I; from
the eleventh century to the
thirteenth, the Scottish kings were scarcely
ever free from Celtic
pretenders and Celtic revolts.[54] The inhabitants
of the west coast
and of the isles were very largely of Scandinavian
blood, and it was
not till 1266 that the western isles definitely passed
from Norway to
the Scottish crown. The English had employed several
opportunities of
allying themselves with these discontented Scotsmen;
but Mr. Freeman's
general statement, already quoted, that "the true
Scots, out of hatred
to the Saxons nearest them, leagued with the Saxons
farther off", is
very far from a fair representation of the facts. We
have seen that
Highlander and Islesman fought under David I at the
battle of the
Standard, against the "Saxons farther off", and that
although the death
of Comyn ranged against Bruce the Highlanders of
Argyll, numbers of
Highlanders were led to victory at Bannockburn by
Earl Randolph; and
Angus Og and the Islesmen formed part of the Scottish
reserves and
stood side by side with the men of Carrick, under the
leadership of
King Robert.
During the troubles which followed King
Robert's death,
the Lords of the Isles had resumed their general
attitude of
opposition. It was an opposition very natural in the
circumstances, the
rebellion of a powerful vassal against a weak central
government, a
reaction against the forces of civilization. But it has
never been
shown that it was an opposition in any way racial; the
complaint that
the Lowlands of Scotland have been "rent by the Saxon
from the Gael",
in the manner of a racial dispossession, belongs to "The
Lady of the
Lake", not to sober history. All Scotland, indeed, has now,
in one
sense, been "rent by the Saxon" from the Celt. "Let no one doubt
the
civilization of these islands," wrote Dr. Johnson, in Skye, "for
Portree possesses a jail." The Highlands and islands have been the last
portions of Scotland to succumb to Anglo-Saxon influences; that the
Lowlands formed an earlier victim does not prove that their racial
complexion is different. The incident of which we have now to speak has
frequently been quoted as a crowning proof of the difference between the
Lowlanders and the "true Scots". Donald of the Isles had a quarrel with
the Regent Albany, and, in 1408, entered into an agreement with Henry
IV, to whom he owned allegiance. But this very quarrel arose about the
earldom of Ross, which was claimed by Donald (himself a grandson of
Robert II) in right of his wife, a member of the Leslie family.
The
"assertor of Celtic nationality" was thus the son of one Lowland woman
and the husband of another. When he entered the Scottish mainland his
progress was first opposed, not by the Lowlanders, but by the Mackays of
Caithness, who were defeated near Dingwall, and the Frasers immediately
afterwards received what the historians of the Clan Donald term a
"well-merited chastisement".[55] Donald pursued his victorious march to
Aberdeenshire, tempted by the prospect of plundering Aberdeen. It is
interesting to note that, while the battle which has given significance
to the record of the dispute was fought for the Lowland town of Aberdeen
in a Lowland part of Aberdeenshire, the very name of the town is Celtic,
and the district in which the battlefield of Harlaw is situated abounds
to this day in Celtic place-names, and, not many miles away, the Gaelic
tongue may still be heard at Braemar or at Tomintoul. It was not to a
racial battle between Celt and Saxon that the Earl of Mar and the
Provost of Aberdeen, aided by the Frasers, marched out to Harlaw, in
July, 1411, to meet Donald of the Isles. Had the clansmen been
victorious there would certainly have been a Celtic revival; but this
was not the danger most dreaded by the victorious Lowlanders. The battle
of Harlaw was part of the struggle with England. Donald of the Isles was
the enemy of Scottish independence, and his success would mean English
supremacy. He had taken up the role of "the Disinherited" of the
preceding century, just as the Earl of March had done some years before.
As time passed, and civilization progressed in the Lowlands while the
Highlands maintained their integrity, the feeling of separation grew
more strongly marked; and as the inhabitants of the Lowlands
intermarried with French and English, the differences of blood became
more evident and hostility became unavoidable. But any such abrupt
racial division as Mr. Freeman drew between the true Scots and the
Scottish Lowlanders stands much in need of proof.
Harlaw was an
incident in the never-ending struggle with England.
It was
succeeded,
in 1416 or 1417, by an unfortunate expedition into England,
known as
the "Foul Raid", and after the Foul Raid came the battle of
Bauge. They
are all part of one and the same story; although Harlaw
might seem an
internal complication and Bauge an act of unprovoked
aggression, both
are really as much part of the English war as is the
Foul Raid or the
battle of Bannockburn itself. The invasion of France by
Henry V
reminded the Scots that the English could be attacked on French
soil as
well as in Northumberland. So the Earl of Buchan, a son of
Albany, was
sent to France at the head of an army, in answer to the
dauphin's
request for help. In March, 1421, the Scots defeated the
English at
Bauge and captured the Earl of Somerset. The death of Henry
V, in the
following year, and the difficulties of the English government
led to
the return of the young King of Scots. The Regent Albany had been
succeeded in 1420 by his son, who was weak and incompetent, and Scotland
longed for its rightful king. James had been carefully educated in
England, and the dreary years of his captivity have enriched Scottish
literature by the "King's Quair":
"More sweet than ever a
poet's heart Gave yet to the English tongue".
Albany seems to have made all due efforts to obtain his nephew's
release, and James was in constant communication with Scotland. He had
been forced to accompany Henry V to France, and was present at the siege
of Melun, where Henry refused quarter to the Scottish allies of France,
although England and Scotland were at war. Although constantly
complaining of his imprisonment, and of the treatment accorded to him in
England, James brought home with him, when his release was negotiated in
1423-24, an English bride, Joan Beaufort, the heroine of the
"Quair".
She was the daughter of Somerset, who had been captured at Bauge, and
grand-daughter of John of Gaunt.
The troublous reign of James I
gave him but little time for conducting a
foreign war, and the truce
which was made when the king was ransomed
continued till 1433. It had
been suggested that the peace between
England and Scotland should
extend to the Scottish troops serving in
France, but no such clause was
inserted in the actual arrangement made,
and it is almost certain that
James could not have enforced it, even had
he wished to do so. He gave,
however, no indication of holding lightly
the ties that bound Scotland
to France, and, in 1428, agreed to the
marriage of his infant daughter,
Margaret, to the dauphin.
Meanwhile,
the Scottish levies had been
taking their full share in the struggle for
freedom in which France was
engaged. At Crevant, near Auxerre, in July,
1423, the Earl of Buchan,
now Constable of France, was defeated by
Salisbury, and, thirteen
months later, Buchan and the Earl of Douglas
(Duke of Touraine) fell on
the disastrous field of Verneuil. At the
Battle of the Herrings (an
attack upon a French convoy carrying Lenten
food to the besiegers of
Orleans, made near Janville, in February,
1429), the Scots, under the
new constable, Sir John Stewart of Darnley,
committed the old error of
Halidon and Homildon, and their impetuous
valour could not avail
against the English archers. They shared in the
victory of Pathay,
gained by the Maid of Orleans in June 1429, almost on
the anniversary
of Bannockburn, and they continued to follow the Maid
through the last
fateful months of her warfare. So great a part had
Scotsmen taken in
the French wars that, on the expiry of the truce in
1433, the English
offered to restore not only Roxburgh but also Berwick
to Scotland. But
the French alliance was destined to endure for more
than another
century, and James declined, thus bringing about a slight
resuscitation
of warlike operations. The Scots won a victory at
Piperden, near
Berwick, in 1435 or 1436, and in the summer of 1436, when
the Princess
Margaret was on her way to France to enter into her
ill-starred union
with the dauphin, the English made an attempt to take
her captive.
James replied by an attempt upon Roxburgh, but gave it up
without
having accomplished anything, and returned to spend his last
Christmas
at Perth. His twelve years in Scotland had been mainly
occupied in
attempts to reduce his rebellious subjects, especially in
the
Highlands, to obedience and loyalty, and he had roused much
implacable
resentment. So the poet-king was murdered at Perth in
February,
1436-37, and his English widow was left to guard her son, the
child
sovereign, now in his seventh year. It was probably under her
influence
that a truce of nine years was made.
When the truce came to an end,
Scotland was in the interval between the
two contests with the House of
Douglas which mark the reign of James II.
William the sixth earl and
his brother David had been entrapped and
beheaded by the governors of
the boy king in November, 1440, and the
new earl, James the Gross, died
in 1443, and was succeeded by his son,
William, the eighth earl, who
remained for some years on good terms with
the king. Accordingly, we
find that, when the English burned the town of
Dunbar in May, 1448,
Douglas replied, in the following month, by sacking
Alnwick.
Retaliation came in the shape of an assault upon Dumfries in
the end of
June, and the Scots, with Douglas at their head, burned
Warkworth in
July. The successive attacks on Alnwick and Warkworth
roused the
Percies to a greater effort, and, in October, they invaded
Scotland,
and were defeated at the battle of Sark or Lochmaben
Stone.[56] In 1449
the Franco-Scottish League was strengthened by the
marriage of King
James to Marie of Gueldres.
Now began the second struggle with the
Douglases. Their great possessions, their rights as Wardens of the
Marches, their prestige in
Scottish history made them dangerous
subjects for a weak royal house.
Since the death of the good Lord James
their loyalty to the kings of
Scotland had not been unbroken, and it is
probable that their suppression was inevitable in the interests of a
strong central government. But the perfidy with which James, with his
own hand, murdered the Earl, in February, 1451-52, can scarcely be
condoned, and it has created a sympathy for the Douglases which their
history scarcely merits. James had now entered upon a decisive struggle
with the great House, which a temporary reconciliation with the new
earl, in 1453, only served to prolong.
The quarrel is interesting for
our purpose because it largely decided the relations between Scotland
and the rival lines of Lancaster and York. In 1455, when the Douglases
were finally suppressed and their estates were forfeited, the Yorkists
first took up arms against Henry VI. Douglas had attempted intrigues
with the Lord of the Isles, with the Lancastrians, and with the
Yorkists in turn, and, about
1454, he came to an understanding with the
Duke of York. We find, therefore, during the years which followed the
first battle of St. Albans, a revival of active hostilities with
England. In 1456, James invaded England and harried Northumberland in
the interests of the Lancastrians. During the temporary loss of power
by the Duke of York, in1457, a truce was concluded, but it was broken
after the reconciliation of York to Henry VI in 1458, and when the
battle of Northampton, in July, 1460, left the Yorkists again
triumphant, James marched to attempt
the recovery of Roxburgh.[57]
James I, as we have seen, had abandoned
the siege of Roxburgh Castle
only to go to his death; his son found his
death while attempting the
same task. On Sunday, the 3rd of August,
1460, he was killed by the
bursting of a cannon, the mechanism of which
had attracted his
attention and made him, according to Pitscottie, "more
curious than
became him or the majesty of a king".
The year 1461 saw Edward IV
placed on his uneasy throne, and a boy of
ten years reigning over the
turbulent kingdom of Scotland. The Scots had
regained Roxburgh a few
days after the death of King James, and they
followed up their success
by the capture of Wark. But a greater triumph
was in store. When
Margaret of Anjou, after rescuing her husband, Henry
VI, at the second
battle of St. Albans, in February, 1461, met, in
March, the great
disaster of Towton, she fled with Henry to Scotland,
where she had been
received when preparing for the expedition which had
proved so
unfortunate.
On her second visit she brought with her the
surrender of
Berwick, which, in April, 1461, became once more a Scots
town, and was
represented in the Parliament which met in 1469. In
gratitude for the
gift, the Scots made an invasion of England in June,
1461, and besieged
Carlisle, but were forced to retire without having
afforded any real
assistance to the Lancastrian cause. There was now a
division of
opinion in Scotland with regard to supporting the
Lancastrian cause.
The policy of the late king was maintained by the
great Bishop Kennedy,
who himself entertained Henry VI in the Castle of
St. Andrews. But the
queen-mother, Mary of Gueldres, was a niece of the
Duke of Burgundy,
and was, through his influence, persuaded to go over
to the side of the
White Rose. While Edward IV remained on unfriendly
terms with Louis XI
of France, Kennedy had not much difficulty in
resisting the Yorkist
proclivities of the queen-mother, and in keeping
Scotland loyal to the
Red Rose. They were able to render their allies
but little assistance,
and their opposition gave the astute Edward IV an
opportunity of
intrigue. John of the Isles took advantage of the
minority of James III
to break the peace into which he had been brought
by James II, and the
exiled Earl of Douglas concluded an agreement
between the Lord of the
Isles and the King of England. But when, in
October, 1463, Edward IV
came to terms with Louis XI, Bishop Kennedy was
willing to join Mary of
Gueldres in deserting the doomed House of
Lancaster. Mary did not live
to see the success of her policy; but peace
was made for a period of
fifteen years, and Scotland had no share in the
brief Lancastrian
restoration of 1470.
The threatening relations between
England and
France nearly led to a rupture in 1473, but the result was
only to
strengthen the agreement, and it was arranged that the infant
heir of
James III should marry the Princess Cecilia, Edward's daughter.
In
1479-80, when the French were again alarmed by the diplomacy of
Edward
IV, we find an outbreak of hostilities, the precise cause of
which is
somewhat obscure. It is certain that Edward made no effort to
preserve
the peace, and he sent, in 1481, a fleet to attack the towns on
the
Firth of Forth, in revenge for a border raid for which James had
attempted to apologize. Edward was unable to secure the services of his
old ally, the Lord of the Isles, who had been again brought into
subjection in the interval of peace, and who now joined in the national
preparations for war with England. But there was still a rebel Earl of
Douglas with whom to plot, and Edward was fortunate in obtaining the
co-operation of the Duke of Albany, brother of James III, who had been
exiled in 1479. Albany and Edward made a treaty in 1482, in which the
former styled himself "Alexander, King of Scotland", and promised to do
homage to Edward when he should obtain his throne. The only important
events of the war are the recapture of Berwick, in August, 1482, and an
invasion of Scotland by the Duke of Gloucester. Berwick was never again
in Scottish hands. Albany was unable to carry out the revolution
contemplated in his treaty with Edward IV; but he was reinstated, and
became for three months Lieutenant-General of the Realm of Scotland. In
March, 1482-83, he resigned this office, and, after a brief interval, in
which he was reconciled to King James, was again forfeited in July,
1483.
Edward IV had died on the 9th of April, and Albany was unable to
obtain any English aid. Along with the Earl of Douglas he made an
attempt upon Scotland, but was defeated at Lochmaben in July, 1484.
Thereafter, both he and his ally pass out of the story: Douglas died a
prisoner in 1488; Albany escaped to France, where he was killed at a
tournament in 1485; he left a son who was to take a great part in
Scottish politics during the minority of James V.
Richard III found
sufficient difficulty in governing England to prevent
his desiring to
continue unfriendly relations with Scotland, and he
made, on his
accession, something like a cordial peace with James III.
It was
arranged that James, now a widower,[58] should marry Elizabeth
Woodville, widow of Edward IV, and that his heir, Prince James, should
marry a daughter of the Duke of Suffolk. James did not afford Richard
any assistance in 1485, and after the battle of Bosworth he remained on
friendly terms with Henry VII. A controversy about Berwick prevented the
completion of negotiations for marriage alliances, but friendly
relations were maintained till the revolution of 1488, in which James
III lost his life. Both James and his rebellious nobles, who had
proclaimed his son as king, attempted to obtain English assistance, but
it was given to neither side.
The new king, James IV, was young,
brave, and ambitious. He was
specially interested in the navy, and in
the commercial prosperity of
Scotland. It was scarcely possible that,
in this way, difficulties with
England could be avoided, for Henry VII
was engaged in developing English trade, and encouraged English
shipping. Accordingly, we find
that, while the two countries were still
nominally at peace, they were
engaged in a naval warfare.
Scotland was
fortunate in the possession of
some great sea-captains, notable among
whom were Sir Andrew Wood and Sir
Andrew Barton.[59] In 1489, Sir
Andrew Wood, with two ships, the Yellow
Carvel and the Flower,
inflicted a severe defeat upon five English
vessels which were engaged
in a piratical expedition in the Firth of
Forth. Henry VII, in great
wrath, sent Stephen Bull, with "three great
ships, well-manned, well-victualled,
and well-artilleried", to revenge
the honour of the English navy, and
after a severe fight Bull and his
vessels were captured by the Scots.
There was thus considerable
irritation on both sides, and while the
veteran intriguer, the Duchess
of Burgundy, attempted to obtain James's
assistance for the pretender,
Perkin Warbeck, the pseudo-Duke of York,
Henry entered into a compact
with Archibald, Earl of Angus, well-known to readers
of "Marmion". The
treachery of Angus led, however, to no
immediate result, and peace was
maintained till 1495, although the
French alliance was confirmed in
1491. The rupture of 1495 was due
solely to the desire of James to aid
Maximilian in the attempt to
dethrone Henry VII in the interests of
Warbeck. Henry, on his part,
made every effort to retain the friendship
of the Scottish king, and
offered a marriage alliance with his eldest
daughter, Margaret. James,
however, was determined to strike a blow for
his protege, and in
November, 1495, Warbeck landed in Scotland, was
received with great
honour, assigned a pension, and wedded to the Lady
Katharine Gordon,
daughter of the greatest northern lord, the Earl of
Huntly.
In the
following April, Ferdinand and Isabella, who were
desirous of
separating Scotland from France, tried to dissuade James
from
supporting Warbeck, and offered him a daughter in marriage,
although
the only available Spanish princess was already promised to
Prince
Arthur of England. But all efforts to avoid war were of no avail,
and
in September, 1496, James marched into England, ravaged the English
borders, and returned to Scotland. The English replied by small border
forays, but James's enthusiasm for his guest rapidly cooled; in July,
1497, Warbeck left Scotland. James did not immediately make peace,
holding himself possibly in readiness in the event of Warbeck's
attaining any success. In August he again invaded England, and attacked
Norham Castle, provoking a counter-invasion of Scotland by the Earl of
Surrey. In September, Warbeck was captured, and, in the same month, a
truce was arranged between Scotland and England, by the Peace of Aytoun.
There was, in the following year, an unimportant border skirmish; but
with the Peace of Aytoun ended this attempt of the Scots to support a
pretender to the English crown. The first Scottish interference in the
troubles of Lancaster and York had been on behalf of the House of
Lancaster; the story is ended with this Yorkist intrigue. When next
there arose circumstances in any way similar, the sympathies of the
Scots were enlisted on the side of their own Royal House of Stuart.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 52: George Dunbar, Earl of March, must be
carefully distinguished from the child, Edmund Mortimer, the English
Earl of March, grandson of Lionel of Clarence, and direct heir to the
English throne after Richard II.]
[Footnote 53: In the summer of
1405 the English ravaged Arran, and the
Scots sacked Berwick. There
were also some naval skirmishes later in the
year.]
[Footnote
54: Cf. App. B.]
[Footnote 55: _The Clan Donald_, vol. i, p. 154.
The Mackenzies were also against the Celtic hero.]
[Footnote 56:
There is great doubt as to whether these events belong to
the year 1448
or 1449. Mr. Lang, with considerable probability, assigns
them to
1449.]
[Footnote 57: James's army contained a considerable
proportion of Islesmen, who, as at Northallerton and at Bannockburn,
fought against "the Saxons farther off".]
[Footnote 58: He had
married, in 1469, Margaret, daughter of Christian I
of Denmark. The
islands of Orkney and Shetland were assigned as payment
for her dowry,
and so passed, a few years later, under the Scottish
Crown.]
[Footnote 59: Cf. _The Days of James IV_, by Mr. G. Gregory Smith, in
the series of "Scottish History from Contemporary Writers".]
|