The Norman Conquest of England could not fail to modify the position of
Scotland. Just as the Roman and the Saxon conquests had, in turn, driven
the Brythons northwards, so the dispossessed Saxons fled to Scotland
from their Norman victors. The result was considerably to alter the
ecclesiastical arrangements of the country, and to help its advance
towards civilization. The proportion of Anglo-Saxons to the races who
are known as Celts must also have been increased; but a complete
de-Celticization
of Southern Scotland could not, and did not, follow.
The failure of
William's conquest to include the Northern counties of
England left
Northumbria an easy prey to the Scottish king, and the
marriage of
Malcolm III, known as Canmore, to Margaret, the sister of
Edgar the
AEtheling, gave her husband an excuse for interference in
England. We,
accordingly, find a long series of raids over the border,
of which only
five possess any importance. In 1069-70, Malcolm (who had,
even in the
Confessor's time, been in Northumberland with hostile
intent) conducted
an invasion in the interests of his brother-in-law.
It is probable that
this movement was intended to coincide with the
arrival of the Danish
fleet a few months earlier. But Malcolm was too
late; the Danes had
gone home, and, in the interval, William had himself
superintended the
great harrying of the North which made Malcolm's
subsequent efforts
somewhat unnecessary. The invasion is important only
as having provoked
the counter-attack of the Conqueror, which led to the
renewal of the
supremacy controversy. William marched into Scotland and
crossed the
Forth (the first English king to do so since the unfortunate
Egfrith,
who fell at Nectansmere in 685). At Abernethy, on the banks of
the Tay,
Malcolm and William met, and the English Chronicle, as usual,
informs
us that the King of Scots became the "man" of the English king.
But as Malcolm received from William twelve "Villae" in England, it is,
at
least, doubtful whether Malcolm paid homage for these alone or also
for
Lothian and Cumbria, or for either of them. There is, at all events,
no question about the "villae". Scottish historians have not failed to
point out that the value of the homage, for whatever it was given, is
sufficiently indicated by Malcolm's dealings with Gospatric of
Northumberland, whom William dismissed as a traitor and rebel. Within
about six months of the Abernethy meeting, Malcolm gave Gospatric the
earldom of Dunbar, and he became the founder of the great house of
March. No further invasion took place till 1079, when Malcolm took
advantage of William's Norman difficulties to make another harrying
expedition, which afforded the occasion for the building of
Newcastle-upon-Tyne. The accession of Rufus and his difficulties with
Robert of Normandy led, in 1091, to a somewhat belated attempt by
Malcolm to support the claims of the AEtheling by a third invasion, and,
in the following year, peace was made. Rufus confirmed to Malcolm the
grant of twelve "villae", and Malcolm in turn gave the English king such
homage as he had given to his father. What this vague statement meant,
it was reserved for the Bruce to determine, and the Bruces had, as yet,
not one foot of Scottish soil. The agreement made in 1092 did not
prevent Rufus from completing his father's work by the conquest of
Cumberland, to which the Scots had claims. Malcolm's indignation and
William's illness led to a famous meeting at Gloucester, whence Malcolm
withdrew in great wrath, declining to be treated as a vassal of England.
The customary invasion followed, with the result that Malcolm was slain
at Alnwick in November, 1093.
But the great effects of the Norman
Conquest, as regards Scotland, are
not connected with strictly
international affairs. They are partially
racial, and, in other
respects, may be described as personal. It is
unquestionable that there
was an immigration of the Northumbrian
population into Scotland; but
the Northumbrian population were
Anglo-Danish, and the north of England
was not thickly populated. When
William the Conqueror ravaged the
northern counties with fire and sword,
a considerable proportion of the
population must have perished. The
actual infusion of English blood may
thus be exaggerated; but the
introduction of English influences cannot
be questioned. These influences were mainly due to the personality of
Malcolm's second wife, the Saxon princess, Margaret. The queen was a
woman of considerable mental power, and possessed a great influence
over her strong-headed and
hot-tempered husband. She was a devout
churchwoman, and she immediately
directed her energies to the task of
bringing the Scottish church into
closer communion with the Roman. The
changes were slight in themselves;
all that we know of them is an
alteration in the beginning of Lent, the
proper observance of Easter
and of Sunday, and a question, still
disputed, about the tonsure. But,
slight as they were, they stood for
much. They involved the abandonment
of the separate position held by the
Scottish Church, and its
acceptance of a place as an integral portion of
Roman Christianity. The
result was to make the Papacy, for the first
time, an important factor
in Scottish affairs, and to bridge the gulf
that divided Scotland from
Continental Europe. We soon find Scottish
churchmen seeking learning in
France, and bringing into Scotland those
French influences which were
destined seriously to affect the
civilization of the country. But,
above all, these Roman changes were
important just because they were
Anglican--introduced by an English
queen, carried out by English
clerics, emanating from a court which was
rapidly becoming English.
Malcolm's subjects thenceforth began to adopt
English customs and the
English tongue, which spread from the court of
Queen Margaret. The
colony of English refugees represented a higher
civilization and a more
advanced state of commerce than the Scottish
Celts, and the English
language, from this cause also, made rapid
progress. For about
twenty-five years Margaret exercised the most potent
influence in her
husband's kingdom, and, when she died, her reputation
as a saint and
her subsequent canonization maintained and supported the
traditions she
had created. Not only did she have on her side the power
of a court and
the prestige of courtly etiquette, but, as we have said,
she
represented a higher civilizing force than that which was opposed to
her, and hence the greatness of her victory. It must, however, be
remembered that the spread of the English language in Scotland does not
necessarily imply the predominance of English blood. It means rather the
growth of English commerce. We can trace the adoption of English along
the seaboard, and in the towns, while Gaelic still remained the
language of the countryman. There is no evidence of any English
immigration of sufficient proportions to overwhelm the Gaelic
population. Like the victory of the conquered English over the
conquering Normans, which was even then making fast progress in England,
it is a triumph of a kind that subsequent events have revealed as
characteristically Anglo-Saxon, and it called into force the powers of
adaptation and of colonization which have brought into being so great an
English-speaking world.
Malcolm's reign ended in defeat and
failure; his wife died of grief, and
the opportunity presented itself
of a Celtic reaction against the
Anglicization of the reign of Malcolm
III. The throne was seized by
Malcolm's brother, Donald Bane. Malcolm's
eldest son, Duncan, whose mother, Ingibjorg, had been a Dane, received
assistance from Rufus, and
drove Donald Bane, after a reign of six
months, into the distant North.
But after about six months he himself
was slain in a small fight with
the Mormaer or Earl of the Mearns, and
Donald Bane continued to reign
for about three years, in conjunction
with Edmund, a son of Malcolm and
Margaret. But in 1097, Edgar, a
younger brother of Edmund, again
obtained the help of Rufus and secured
the throne. The reign of Edgar is
important in two respects. It put an
end to the Celtic revival, and
reproduced the conditions of the time of
Malcolm and Margaret.Henceforward Celtic efforts were impossible
except in the Highlands, and
the Celts of the Lowlands resigned
themselves to the process of
Anglicization imposed upon them alike by
ecclesiastical, political, and
commercial circumstances. It saw also
the beginning of an influence
which was to prove scarcely less fruitful
in results than the Anglo-Saxon triumph of which we have spoken. In
November, 1100, Edgar's sister, Matilda, was married to the Norman King
of England, Henry I, and two years later, another sister, Mary, was
married to Eustace, Count of
Boulogne, the son of the future King
Stephen. These unions, with a son
and a grandson respectively of
William the Conqueror, prepared the way
for the Norman Conquest of
Scotland. Edgar died in January, 1106-7, and
his brother and successor,
Alexander I, espoused an Anglo-Norman,
Sybilla, who is generally
supposed to have been a natural daughter of
Henry I. On the death of
Alexander, in 1124, these Norman influences
acquired a new importance
under his brother David, the youngest son of
Malcolm and Margaret.
During the troubles which followed his father's
death, David had been
educated in England, and after the marriage of
Henry I and Matilda, had
resided at the court of his brother-in-law,
till the death of Edgar,
when he became ruler of Cumbria and the
southern portion of Lothian. He
had married, in 1113-14, the daughter
and heiress of Walthe of, Earl of
Huntingdon, who was also the widow of a
Norman baron. In this way the
earldom of Huntingdon became attached to
the Scottish throne, and
afforded an occasion for reviving the old
question of homage. Moreover,
Waltheof of Huntingdon was the son of
Siward of Northumbria, and David
regarded himself as, on this account,
possessing claims over
Northumbria.
David, as we have seen, had been brought up under
Norman influences, andit is under the son of the Saxon Margaret that
the bloodless Norman conquest of Scotland took place. Edgar had
recognized the new English
nobility and settlers by addressing charters
to all in his kingdom, "both Scots and English"; his brother, David,
speaks of "French and
English, Scots and Galwegians". The charters are,
of course, addressed to barons and land-owners, and their evidence
refers to the English and Anglo-Norman nobility. The Norman
fascination, which had been turned to
such good account in England, in
Italy, and in the Holy Land, had
completely vanquished such English
prepossessions as David might have
inherited from his mother. Normans,
like the Bruces and the Fitzalans
(afterwards the Stewarts), came to
David's court and received from him
grants of land. The number of
Norman signatures that attest his charters
show that his _entourage_
was mainly Norman. He was a very devout
Church-man (a "sair sanct for
the Crown" as James VI called him), and
Norman prelate and Norman abbot
helped to increase the total of Norman
influence. He transformed
Scotland into a feudal country, gave grants of
land by feudal tenure,
summoned a great council on the feudal principle,
and attempted to
create such a monarchy as that of which Henry I was
laying the
foundations. There can be little doubt that this strong
Norman
influence helped to prepare the Scottish people for the French
alliance; but its more immediate effect was to bring about the existence
of an anti-national nobility. These great Norman names were to become
great in Scottish story; but it required a long process to make their
bearers, in any sense, Scotsmen. Most of them had come from England,
many of them held lands in England, and none of them could be expected
to feel any real difference between themselves and their English
fellows.
During the reign of Henry I, Anglo-Norman influences thus
worked a great change in Scotland. On Henry's death, David, as the
uncle of the Empress Matilda, immediately took up arms on her behalf.
Stephen, with the wisdom which characterized the beginning of his
reign, came to terms with him at Durham. David did not personally
acknowledge the usurper, but his son, Henry, did him homage for
Huntingdon and some possessions
in the north (1136). In the following
year, David claimed Northumberland for Henry as the representative of
Siward, and, on Stephen's refusal, again adopted the cause of the
empress. The usual invasion of England followed, and after some months
of ravaging, a short truce, and a slight Scottish victory gained at
Clitheroe on the Ribble,in June, 1138, the final result was David's
great defeat in the battle
of the Standard, fought near Northallerton
on the 22nd August, 1138.
The battle of the Standard possesses no
special interest for students of
the art of war. The English army,
under William of Albemarle and Walter
l'Espec, was drawn up in one line
of battle, consisting of knights in
coats of mail, archers, and
spearmen. The Scots were in four divisions;
the van was composed of the
Picts of Galloway, the right wing was led by
Prince Henry, and the men
of Lothian were on the left. Behind fought
King David, with the men of
Moray. The Galwegians made several
unsuccessful attempts upon the
English centre. Prince Henry led his
horse through the English left
wing, but the infantry failed to follow,
and the prince lost his
advantage by a premature attempt to plunder. The
Scottish right made a
pusillanimous attempt on the English left, and the
reserve began to
desert King David, who collected the remnants of his
army and retired
in safety to a height above Cowton Moor, the scene of
the fight. Prince
Henry was left surrounded by the enemy, but saved the
position by a
clever stratagem, and rejoined his father. Mr. Oman
remarks that the
battle was "of a very abnormal type for the twelfth
century, since the
side which had the advantage in cavalry made no
attempt to use it,
while that which was weak in the all-important arm
made a creditable
attempt to turn it to account by breaking into the
hostile flank....
Wild rushes of unmailed clansmen against a steady
front of spears and
bows never succeeded; in this respect Northallerton
is the forerunner
of Dupplin, Halidon Hill, Flodden, and Pinkie."[34]
The chief interest,
for our purpose, attaching to the battle of the
Standard, is connected
with the light it throws upon the racial
complexion of the country
seventy years after the Norman Conquest. Our
chief authorities are the
Hexham chroniclers and Ailred of Rivaulx[35],
English writers of the
twelfth century. They speak of David's host as
composed of Angli, Picti,
and Scoti. The Angli alone contained mailed
knights in their ranks, and
David's first intention was to send these
mail-clad warriors against
the English, while the Picts and Scots were
to follow with sword and
targe. The Galwegians and the Scots from beyond
Forth strongly opposed
this arrangement, and assured the king that his
unarmed Highlanders
would fight better than "these Frenchmen". The king
gave the place of
honour to the Galwegians, and altered his whole plan
of battle. The
whole context, and the Earl of Strathern's sneer at
"these Frenchmen",
would seem to show that the "Angli" are, at all
events, clearly
distinguished from the Picts of Galloway and the Scots
who, like Malise
of Strathern, came from beyond the Forth. It is
probable that the "Angli"
were the men of Lothian; but it must also be
recollected both that the
term included the Anglo-Norman nobility
("these Frenchman") and the
English settlers who had followed Queen
Margaret, and that David was
fighting in an English quarrel and in the
interests of an English
queen. The knights who wore coats of mail were
entirely Anglo-Norman,
and it is against them that the claim of the
Highlanders is
particularly directed. When Richard of Hexham tells us
that Angles,
Scots, and Picts fell out by the way, as they returned
home, he means
to contrast the men of Lothian and the new Anglo-Norman
nobility with
the Picts of Galloway and the Highlanders from north of
the Forth, and this unusual application of the term
"Angli", to a
portion of the
Scottish army, is an indication, not that the Lowlanders
were entirely
English, but that there was a strong jealousy between the
Scots and the
new English nobility. The "Angli" are, above all others,
the knights in
mail.[36]
It is not possible to credit David with any real
affection for the cause of the empress or with any higher motive than
selfish greed, and it can scarcely be claimed that he kept faith with
Stephen. Such, however, were the difficulties of the English king,
that, in spite of his crushing defeat, David reaped the advantages of
victory. Peace was made in April, 1139, by the Treaty of Durham, which
secured to Prince Henry the earldom of Northumberland, as an English
fief. The Scottish border line, which had successively enclosed
Strathclyde and part of Cumberland, and the Lothians, now extended to
the Tees. David gave Stephen some assistance in 1139, but on the
victory of the Empress Maud[37] at Lincoln, in 1141, David deserted the
captive king, and was present, on the empress's side, at her defeat at
Winchester, in 1141.Eight years later he entered into an agreement
with the claimant, Henry Fitz-Empress, afterwards Henry II, by which
the eldest son of the Scottish king was to retain his English fiefs,
and David was to aid Henry against Stephen. An unsuccessful attempt on
England followed--the last of David's numerous invasions. When he died,
in 1153, he left Scotland in a position of power with regard to England
such as she wasnever again to occupy. The religious devotion which
secured for him a popular canonization (he was never actually
canonized) can scarcely justify his conduct to Stephen. But it must be
recollected that throughout his reign, there is comparatively little
racial antagonism between the two countries. David interfered in an
English civil war, andtook part, now on one side, and now on the
other. But the whole effect
of his life was to bring the nations more
closely together through the
Norman influences which he encouraged in
Scotland. His son and heir held
great fiefs in England,[38] and he
granted tracts of land to Anglo-Norman nobles. A Bruce and a Balliol,
who each held possessions both in Scotland and in England, tried to
prevent the battle of the Standard. Their well-meant efforts proved
fruitless; but the fact is
notable and significant.
David's
eldest son, the gallant Prince Henry, who had led the wild
charge at
Northallerton, predeceased his father in 1152. He left three
sons, of
whom the two elder, Malcolm and William, became successively
kings of
Scotland, while from the youngest, David, Earl of Huntingdon,
were
descended the claimants at the first Inter-regnum. It was the fate
of
Scotland, as so often again, to be governed by a child; and a strong
king, Henry II, was now on the throne of England. As David I had taken
advantage of the weakness of Stephen, so now did Henry II benefit by the
youth of Malcolm IV. In spite of the agreement into which Henry had
entered with David in 1149, he, in 1157, obtained from Malcolm, then
fourteen years of age, the resignation of his claims upon
Northumberland, Cumberland, and Westmoreland. In return for this,
Malcolm received a confirmation of the earldom of Huntingdon (cf. p.
18). The abandonment of the northern claims seems to have led to a
quarrel, for Henry refused to knight the Scots king; but, in the
following year, Malcolm accompanied Henry in his expedition to Toulouse,
and received his knighthood at Henry's hands. Malcolm's subsequent
troubles were connected with rebellions in Moray and in Galloway against
the new _regime_, and with the ambition of Somerled, the ruler of
Argyll, and of the still independent western islands. The only occasion
on which he again entered into relations with England was in 1163, when
he met Henry at Woodstock and did homage to his eldest son, who became
known as Henry III, although he never actually reigned. As usual, there
is no statement precisely defining the homage; it must not be forgotten
that the King of Scots was also Earl of Huntingdon.
Malcolm died in
1165, and was succeeded by his brother, William the
Lion, who reigned
for nearly fifty years. Henry was now in the midst of
his great
struggle with the Church, but William made no attempt to use
the
opportunity. He accepted the earldom of Huntingdon from Henry, and
in
1170, when the younger Henry was crowned in Becket's despite, William
took the oath of fealty to him as Earl of Huntingdon. But in 1173-74,
when the English king's ungrateful son organized a baronial revolt,
William decided that his chance had come. His grandfather, David, had
made him Earl of Northumberland, and the resignation which Henry had
extorted from the weakness of Malcolm IV could scarcely be held as
binding upon William. So William marched into England to aid the rebel
prince, and, after some skirmishes and the usual ravaging, was surprised
while tilting near Alnwick, and made a captive. He was conveyed to the
castle of Falaise in Normandy, and there, on December 8th, 1174, as a
condition of his release, he signed the Treaty of Falaise, which
rendered the kingdom of Scotland, for fifteen years, unquestionably the
vassal of England.[39] The treaty acknowledged Henry II as overlord of
Scotland, and expressly stated the dependence of the Scottish Church
upon that of England. The relations of the churches had been an
additional cause of difficulty since the time of St. Margaret, and the
present arrangement was in no sense final. A papal legate held a council
in Edinburgh in 1177, and ten years afterwards Pope Clement III took the
Scottish Church directly under his own protection.
About the
political relationship there could be no such doubt. William
stood,
theoretically, if not actually, in much the same position to
Henry II,
as John Baliol afterwards occupied to Edward I. It was not
till the
accession of Richard I that William recovered his freedom. The
castles
in the south of Scotland which had been delivered to the English
were
restored, and the independence of Scotland was admitted, on
William's
paying Richard the sum of 10,000 marks. This agreement, dated
December,
1189, annulled the terms of the Treaty of Falaise, and left
the
position of William the Lion exactly what it had been at the death
of
Malcolm IV. He remained liegeman for such lands as the Scottish kings
had, in times past, done homage to England. The agreement with Richard I
is certainly not incompatible with the Scottish position that the
homage, before the Treaty of Falaise, applied only to the earldom of
Huntingdon; but the usual vagueness was maintained, and the arrangement
in no way determines the question of the homage paid by the earlier
Scottish kings. For a hundred years after this date, the two countries
were never at war. William had difficulties with John; in 1209, an
outbreak of hostilities seemed almost certain, but the two kings came to
terms. The long reign of William came to an end in 1214. His son and
successor, Alexander II, joined the French party in England which was
defeated at Lincoln in 1216. Alexander made peace with the regent,
resigned all claims to Northumberland, and did homage for his English
possessions--the most important of which was the earldom of Huntingdon,
which had, since 1190, been held by his uncle, David, known as David of
Huntingdon. In 1221, he married Joanna, sister of Henry III. Another
marriage, negotiated at the same time, was probably of more real
importance. Margaret, the eldest daughter of William the Lion, became
the wife of the Justiciar of England, Hubert de Burgh. Mr. Hume Brown
has pointed out that immediately on the fall of Hubert de Burgh, a
dispute arose between Henry and Alexander. The English king desired
Alexander to acknowledge the Treaty of Falaise, and this Alexander
refused to do. The agreement, which averted an appeal to the sword, was,
on the whole, favourable to Scotland. Nothing was said about homage for
this kingdom. David of Huntingdon had died in 1119, and Alexander gave
up the southern earldom, but received a fief in the northern counties,
always coveted of the kings of Scotland. This arrangement is known as
the Treaty of York (1236). Some trifling incidents and the second
marriage of Alexander, which brought Scotland into closer touch with
France (he married Marie, daughter of Enguerand de Coucy), nearly
provoked a rupture in 1242, but the domestic troubles of Henry and
Alexander alike prevented any breach of the long peace which had
subsisted since the capture of William the Lion. In 1249, the Scottish
king died, and his son and successor,[40] Alexander III, was knighted by
Henry of England, and, in 1251, married Margaret, Henry's eldest
daughter. The relations of Alexander to Henry III and to Edward I will
be narrated in the following chapter. Not once throughout his reign was
any blood spilt in an English quarrel, and the story of his reign forms
no part of our subject. Its most interesting event is the battle of
Largs. The Scottish kings had, for some time, been attempting to annex
the islands, and, in 1263, Hakon of Norway invaded Scotland as a
retributive measure. He was defeated at the battle of Largs, and, in
1266, the Isles were annexed to the Scottish crown. The fact that this
forcible annexation took place, after a struggle, only twenty years
before the death of Alexander III, must be borne in mind in connection
with the part played by the Islanders in the War of Independence.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 34: _Art of War in the Middle Ages_, p. 391.]
[Footnote 35: Cf. App. A.]
[Footnote 36: In the final order of
battle, David seems to have
attempted to bring all classes of his
subjects together, and the
divisions have a political as well as a
military purpose. The right wing
contained Anglo-Norman knights and men
from Strathclyde and Teviotdale,
the left wing men from Lothian and
Highlanders from Argyll and the
islands, and King David's reserve was
composed of more knights along
with men from Moray and the region north
of the Forth.]
[Footnote 37: The Empress Maud, daughter of Henry I,
and niece of David, must be carefully distinguished from Queen Maud,
wife of Stephen, and cousin of David, who negotiated the Treaty of
Durham.]
[Footnote 38: Ailred credits Bruce with a long speech, in
which he tries to convince David that his real friends are not his
Scottish subjects, but his Anglo-Norman favourites, and that,
accordingly, he should keep
on good terms with the English.]
[Footnote 39: William's English earldom of Huntingdon, which had been
forfeited, was restored, in 1185, and was conferred by William upon his
brother, David, the ancestor of the claimants of 1290.]
[Footnote
40: As Alexander III was the last king of Scotland who ruled
before the
War of Independence, it is interesting to note that he was
crowned at
Scone with the ancient ceremonies, and as the representative
of the
Celtic kings of Scotland. Fordun tells us that the coronation
took
place on the sacred stone at Scone, on which all Scottish kings had
sat, and that a Highlander appeared and read Alexander's Celtic
genealogy (Annals XLVIII. Cf. App. A). There is no indication that
Alexander's subjects, from the Forth to the Moray Firth, were "stout
Northumbrian Englishmen", who had, for no good reason, drifted away from
their English countrymen, to unite them with whom Edward I waged his
Scottish wars.]
|