f. Trade with
France
The only new feature
of any importance in Scottish trade during this period was the
development of the trade to America. There was also some trade to
the West Indies, not only to the British islands, but also to the
Dutch possessions of Curacoa and Antigua, and to the Caribbee
Islands and St Christophers. This trade was chiefly carried on by
ships from the Clyde ports, which also went to the Canary Islands.
But the principal trade of the country was still with Spain, France,
Holland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark and the Baltic ports. The towns
which the Scots merchants frequented were San Sebastian and Bilbao;
Lisbon; Bordeaux, Rochelle, Rouen and Dieppe; Campvere, Middelberg,
Rotterdam and Amsterdam; Bergen, Gothenberg and Stockholm;
Konigsberg, Stettin, Lubeck, Dantzig and Hamburg. The east coast
ports had some trade with London, and also with Newcastle, but apart
from these there was little trade with England by sea. Between
Ireland, especially the north, and the west coast of Scotland, there
was much communication.
The Scots still
continued to trade in what the English despised as a "mean and
peddling" manner. Ships were loaded by a number of merchants, each
making some small contribution to the cargo. One man would put on
board five hundred pounds of butter; another, one thousand ells of
linen cloth and ten dozen stockings; a third, fifty-two kidskins, or
five dozen salt hides, or perhaps eight hundredweight of old brass;
and so the ship's load was gradually made up. The ships, too, were
sailed more cheaply than English ships. Trade was still much
hampered by the special position of the royal burghs, which, in
spite of opposition and agitation from the "unfree" burghs,
continued to retain their privileges.
Scotland during this
period felt the disadvantage of her connection with England far more
heavily than she had during the earlier part of the century. Then
she had shared in the English coasting trade, and also, though to a
small extent, she had traded between England and some continental
ports. The Navigation Acts cut her off from all share in either of
these branches of trade, as well as from any legitimate share in the
Plantation trade. But it was in her foreign trade, rather than in
her trade with England herself, that her English connection was most
disastrous. England's enemies were not Scotland's enemies, yet
because of their common sovereign Scotland had to share in England's
wars. Unfortunately these were waged against Scotland's friends and
commercial allies, the Dutch, during nearly ten years of Charles's
reign; and the French, during practically the whole of William's
reign. From the Dutch war the Scots suffered in two ways, from the
embargo placed on their trade with Holland, which was of great
importance to them; and from the damage to their ships sailing to
France and the south from Dutch men-of-war and privateers. During
the long wars with France the state of affairs was somewhat
different. Trade with France was not always prohibited, and the
prohibition was very generally disregarded. But those who continued
to trade suffered both from French privateers and from English
ships, which attempted to prevent communication between Scotland and
France.
Scottish trade with
France was injured by the general commercial conditions in Europe,
as well as by her English connection. During the seventeenth
century, especially in the latter half, both England and France
developed highly protective systems. Scotland was not included in
the English system, and French protection led to the abolition of
her old privileges there. For this the Scots blamed their
relationship with England. They were greatly disappointed that they
were neither represented, nor their interests considered, at the
Treaty of Ryswick, and that the opportunity was not taken for
re-establishing them in their favoured position in France. There was
a general feeling amongst all classes that this subordination of
their interests could not continue. "There is no Nation so much hurt
in Trade by England as is Scotland; Because we are under their Head,
but not of their Politick Body....Why do wee loss the Friendship of
all our ancient Aliyes for the quarrels betwixt them and England,
whilst England gives neither Friendship free Trade nor priviledge to
us."
At the beginning of
the eighteenth century steps were taken to take the control of
foreign relations from the hands of the sovereign, who was
presumably influenced by English interests, and to make it a
national business. An overture for an Act appointing Scottish
residents and consuls, "in such Places as are most proper for the
trade of this nation," was brought forward. An Act was passed
rescinding the Act of Charles II's first Parliament which vested in
the King the power of ordering foreign trade, as being "prejudiciall
to the Trade of this Nation." An Act was also brought forward for
making the kingdom a free port, by removing all duties on imports
and exports whether carried by natives or by foreigners. This
however was not passed. The Act of Peace and War and the Act
allowing the import of foreign wines were more. important. The
former placed the power of declaring war in the hands of the
Scottish Parliament, so that Scotland need not necessarily be at war
with the same countries as England. The "Wine Act" followed the same
policy; allowing the import of wines legalised trade with France,
while England was still at war with her. These Acts, shewing that
Scotland was going to regulate her own foreign political and
commercial relations in her own interests, naturally alarmed English
statesmen, and did much to force on the Union.
In spite of these
drawbacks to her commerce, Scottish shipping increased somewhat
during this period. Under the Commonwealth the Scots lost most of
their ships, many being taken by the English, while others were lost
during the Dutch wars. In 1662 the Burgh Convention declared that
"in the yeiris 1650 and 1651, and thairefter the Inglish did sease
upon and tak the whole schippis of Scotland great and small, so that
the whole schippis now belonging to Scotland ar of ane verie
inconsiderable value." The vessels bought after the Restoration were
chiefly of foreign build, very few ships being as yet built in
Scotland. This was another reason against the admission of Scots
ships to share in English commerce. During the Dutch and French wars
the Scots succeeded in capturing some ships from the enemy, but they
also lost a considerable number. In 1656 the number of ships
belonging to the principal ports was estimated at 127, their total
tonnage being 3866 tons. An inquiry was made into the condition of
the Royal Burghs in 1693, and from statements then made it seems
that they owned about 117 ships, but in this list no Fife, Forth or
Clyde ports were given, except Kirkcaldy, Leith, Queensferry and
Glasgow. Aberdeen too was omitted. Further information was given in
a register of Scottish ships drawn up in 1712, in which those put on
the register at the time of the Union were specially distinguished.
These numbered 215, with a tonnage of 14,485 tons. This list was
more exhaustive than either of the others, but there was doubtless
some increase in numbers, and certainly a considerable increase in
the tonnage of the ships. The Scots employed a number of foreign
ships, chiefly Dutch. After the Union they were of course limited to
Scottish and English ships, which partly accounts for the growth in
shipping in the years 1707-1712, when the increase in the number of
Scottish owned ships was 908. This was also due to an increase of
trade, and especially to the Scots admission to the Plantation
trade. In the Clyde ports, which were most affected by that liberty,
the number of ships rose from 21 to 216, a much greater proportional
increase than that of any other group of ports.
During the latter
part pf the century England realised that France was her most
formidable rival, both politically and commercially. At the same
time she gradually came to recognise the danger of the Scottish
connection with France, and the necessity for getting the power to
control Scottish relations with foreign powers. France, first under
Richelieu, then under the great commercial minister Colbert, began
in the seventeenth century to develop her great internal resources,
and to consider the interests of trade and industry to be of primary
importance. As reprisal for the English Navigation Act, to act as a
check to Holland, and also to encourage French shipping, a tax of 50
sous per ton was in 1659 imposed on all foreign vessels trading with
France. This imposition was one of the first steps towards building
up that complete system of protection which was identified with the
name of its originator, Colbert. In 1662, the Dutch Ambassador at
Paris wrote to his government, " On remue ciel et terre ici pour
oter aux etrangers la navigation et le commerce." The policy was
continued by anew tariff enforced in 1664. This increased the duties
on English manufactures, but in 1667 another tariff was enforced, in
which the duties upon English and Dutch manufactures were doubled.
English merchants were much alarmed, and asserted that trade with
France was carried on at a loss of about a million pounds a year.
The Whig party took up their cause, and after much agitation a Bill
was passed in 1678 entirely prohibiting trade with France. This
policy was continued at the Revolution, when English, especially
Whig, hatred of France was increased by Louis XIV's great schemes of
political aggrandisement, and by his shelter of the exiled Stewarts.
Scotland at this time
was placed in a position of great difficulty. England and France
were both developing strong protective systems. England had
prohibited her trade with the Plantations, and high tariffs in both
countries hindered trade between England and Scotland. But her
French trade had always been of more importance to Scotland than her
English, and her merchants had for long enjoyed special privileges
there. They were exempted for four years from the duty on shipping
imposed in 1659, but in 1663 it was levied on Scottish ships also.
This occasioned many complaints from Scots merchants. They declared
that they were "in hazard to be reduced to the common condition of
strangers and to losse the benefite of those antient privileges
which for many ages they have enjoyed." Her trade with France was so
important that she could not afford to make any retaliation, and
merely confined herself to complaints and remonstrances, which were
futile. Her connection with England was blamed as the cause of her
disabilities in France. The difficulty of Scotland's position
increased between the Revolution and the Union of the Kingdoms.
Politically she was bound up with England, where the King, the
powerful Whig party, and most of the mercantile interest were
hostile to, and shortly to be at war with France. Commercially she
was separated from England by high tariffs and by the Navigation
Acts, while the continuance of her trade with France was necessary
for her prosperity. There was also a strong party in Scotland who
still considered themselves subjects of the exiled King, and who
kept up a constant correspondence with the court at St Germain.
During the period from the Revolution to the Union, occupied as it
was by England's wars with France, Scotland was torn in two by her
conflicting interests.
During the war of the
League of Augsburg, commercial connection between England and France
was entirely prohibited. The Scots Parliament and Privy Council
occasionally issued Acts and Proclamations against commerce and
correspondence with France, but it does not appear that any of the
authorities really tried to enforce the prohibitions. Various cases
of their infringement are mentioned in the Privy Council Register,
but always in the form of a complaint by merchants that English
privateers had illegally taken it upon themselves to examine Scots
ships—a complaint endorsed by the Council. France, during the war,
imposed new duties on some imports, including the chief articles of
Scottish trade. In 1697 the Convention of the Royal Burghs
represented to the Privy Council "what discouradgements the trade
and commerce of this kingdome is under through the heavie
impositiones and burdenes that are upon the goodes they import to
France, as particularly ther Scots woollens, butter, linnen cloath,
coalls and all other goods imported to France....As also the fishing
of this natione, which is undenyably the farr greatest manufactury
thereof cannot be vended in France, being under an absolute
prohibitione only since the beginning of the lait warr." The Scots
were anxious to be represented in the "treaty of commerce to be held
betwix your subjects of Brittane and those of France," in order that
"the matter of trade may be adjusted and your subjects of this
kingdome restored to their antient priuieledges." But no concessions
were made to Scotland when the Peace of Ryswick was concluded in
1697, which was a cause of much complaint. Fletcher of Saltoun
declared that in this affair the Scottish nation would have been
well advised had they supported a minister of their own, "who might
have obtained the reestablishment of the Nation in the Priviledges
they had in France, which was totally neglected: And notwithstanding
the great and unproportionable numbers of Sea and Land Soldiers that
we were obliged to furnish for the support of the war, yet not one
tittle of advantage was procured to us by the Peace."
As it was evident
that nothing could be done to restore the Scottish privileges in
France by English negotiation, the Scots began to urge the adoption
of retaliatory measures. The Committee of Trade resolved "that ye
tread with ffrance is most prejudiciall to this nations interest in
respect that they have annulled the priviledges of ye Scots nation
in ffrance and of late have prohibited the import of Scots goods by
Scots men...by impositions equivalent to ane prohibitione and as a
remedy it is proposed that ye import of French goods be discharged
untill ye Scots priviledges be restored and those incumbrances and
heavy impositions be taken off." Accordingly in 1701 the "Act
Dischargeing Wine Brandie and all other Liquors of the grouth of
France" was passed. It provided that "this prohibition shall
continue ay and while the same liberties and immunities be granted
to herrings and all other goods imported from this Kingdom into
France and the same freedom and immunities granted to Scots ships
sailing thither that any other Nation enjoy in that Kingdom." With
this Act as a basis for negotiation the Scots endeavoured to treat
with France on their own account. In August of the same year, Mr
Alexander Cunninghame wrote from Paris to Carstares that he had at
last succeeded in interviewing Count de Torcy about Scottish trade.
"He asked to see a power from the King of England and would give no
answer to the removing their edict till the King of England did give
me authority to treat.. .if the King of England would appoint
Commissioners presently, that the treaty might be concluded very
soon...and that the French King would be easily disposed to grant to
the Scottish nation their antient privileges or other new ones that
would be more for the benefit of commerce." But the King of England
would give no authority, and these negotiations were fruitless.
Indeed in 1701 greater impositions were laid upon goods " du cru et
fabrique d'Angleterre, ^Icosse, Irlande et pays en dependant." The
prohibition did not entirely put a stop to the trade with France.
The tacksmen of the customs demanded, and received, a reduction in
the tack because of their loss through the prohibition of the import
of French wines. It was, however, pointed out that "even the
prohibitions were not so strictly observed but that the tacksmen had
full benefit by import of the very goods prohibited." The
prohibition policy, however, was not successful. There must have
been considerable decrease in the trade, for the customs decreased,
and the custom on French wines had been the chief fund for the civil
list. Also the French trade was very important to the country.
Unless an Act allowing the trade again were passed, it was said "the
subjects may plow up their towns and burn their ships." Accordingly
in 1703 the Scottish Parliament passed the "Act allowing the
Importation of Wines and other Forreign Liquors," and also the "Act
anent Peace and Warr," which made a great stir in both countries.
The two Acts were generally considered to hang together. "The Scots
Wine Act makes a great noise in this place. I have heard some
members of Parliament declare they look upon it as the opening a
back door to the enemies of England, and as putting in practice
already their other Act whereby they are empowered to observe a
neutrality in the wars of England when they please." Burnet's
account of the matter is as follows: "Another act of a strange
nature passed, allowing the imposition of French goods...The truth
was, the revenue was so exhausted that they had not enough to
support the government without such help: those who desired to drink
good wine, and all who were concerned in trade, raa into it, so it
was carried, tho' with great opposition. The Jacobites also went
into it, since it opened a free correspondence with France; it was
certainly against the public interest of the government." The "Wine
Act" was the last contribution of the legislature to Scotland's
struggle for trade with France, so we may now turn to examine the
amount and the nature of the trade actually carried on during the
time when trade between England and France was prohibited.
In 1691 the captain
of the ship Pembroke, sent by the Lords of the Admiralty to examine
boats suspected of trading with France, wrote from Greenock: "In my
last I gave you an account that the Scots had a free trade with
France, which I now confirm....I heard of one Francis Duncombe,
master of the John, pink, whom I followed to this place, intending
to have examined him, but above 20 of his men presented their arms
at me,...and farther they told me that free trading was allowed in
these parts with France, and their merchants must live." Later Mr
Trumbull wrote to Mr Secretary Johnstone upon a matter, which, he
said, the Lords Justices preferred to refer to the Lords of the
Admiralty instead of directly to His Majesty, namely, "a Complaint
of a Trade driven with ffrance by some of Scotland...this unlawfull
Practice so very prejudiciall to his Maty." Although corn was not
one of the chief exports to France, there were several complaints
from England during the wars that corn from Scotland supplied the
enemy with victual. In 1694 the Queen wrote to the Scottish Privy
Council complaining of the export of corn to France to "supply the
necessities of our enemies." The Privy Council answered that corn
had not been sent there; "But to our Regrate The Supply of Cornes
that our Enemies have had from us Hath been by their Privateers
taking our ships all allongst our coasts." In spite of the denial of
the Privy Council it seems, from other complaints, that the Queen
had some ground for her remonstrance. A considerable number of
Scottish merchants settled in Dublin, whence they carried
provisions, both Irish and Scottish, and information, to France. Mr
Francis Babe, an official in Dublin, says that "there was a Trade
frequently carried on by Scotch Merchants that resides in this Citty...between
ffrance and Ireland, by reason of which trade, the enemy were
supplied with great, Quantities of our provisions, and especially in
the year 1693 when the Commonality of ffrance were perishing for
want of bread, that intelligence by letters were sent from this
Citty to Rochell, that gave Account of our Navall preparations for
making a descent into ffrance, and that in short time after sending
that intelligence we were unsuccessful in our attempt on St Mallo."
Many complaints were made about the transport of English wool from
Scotland to France, where it was used in the French cloth
manufacture.
The English also
complained of the import into England of prohibited French goods
from Scotland. In 1705 the Privy Council wrote to the Lord
Lieutenant of Cumberland, that Her Majesty in Council had "received
information of an evil practice of bringing tobacco, brandy and
other commodities into this Kingdom out of Scotland by land, without
paying the usual duties according to law." Also when seizures had
been made by the officers "the said commodities have been rescued
from them by numbers of men assembled together in a tumultuous
manner, armed„ with clubs, plough coulters and other instruments of
iron."
Endeavours were made
by the English government to stop this trade with France. English
privateers and men-of-war cruised about the Scottish coasts in order
to arrest ships suspected of trading with France or the Plantations.
This interference was resented by the merchants, and also by the
Privy Council, on the grounds of damage to their trade, and that,
"as Scotland is ane absolute kingdome soe neither England nor other
fforaigners Have the Least power within the Scotts waters and
harbours And that any Attempts made by them of this Kynde Is ane
Hayle Violatione of the Law of Nationes." In 1694 the Glasgow
merchants declared that a small ship cruised in the Clyde, and
"under a pretence of a Commissione from the Admiralty of England for
Searching after goods from ffrance or from America Enters aboard all
Shipps Coming out from or Going Into Clyde and takes provisions and
what else He finds." The merchants suggested that a "shipp of fforce"
should be equipped, and sent out to apprehend such vessels, and to
"secure the River of Clyde from all such who may disturbe their
trade." They offered to provide and equip the ship if the government
would send seamen. In the same year the Privy Council wrote to the
King, that trade was so much interrupted by the interference of
English ships that " our merchants are soe much discouradged and
prejudged...that many of them already hes given over trade and the
rest must follow their example." Some years later the merchants of
Edinburgh, on behalf of themselves and^the other merchants of the
kingdom, complained that " we are wholly frustrat of our Trade to
Portugal Lighurn or any other free port in the Streights, for the
English do carry up all ships belonging to Scotland for any of these
Places... suspecting that our ships are going to France." After the
passing of the "Wine Act," the English became still more alarmed
about Scottish correspondence with France. In September, 1704,
Roxburgh wrote from London that the House of Lords were about to
address the Queen, "to have ships sett in such and such stations for
taking of Scotch ships going or coming from France."
Scottish trade did
not only suffer from English ships attacking her vessels because of
their trade with France, but also from French attacks because of her
connection with England. She was thus doubly handicapped throughout
the war. All the time the tacksmen of the customs received many
complaints from merchants whose ships had been seized by the French,
and also claims for the remission of duty or for compensation. Some
of these were granted. The tacksmen for the years 1691 to 1696
allowed £2901. 7s. 5d. to several merchants as "abatements for duty
upon ships taken during the French war." One Glasgow merchant and
his partners lost twenty-two ships and their cargoes between 1690
and 1698, and two more in 1699 and 1700, one "loaded with linnings,
herrings etc bound for Madera and the other homeward bound from
Norway."
Altogether the Scots
merchants suffered very much from these wars. They attributed their
losses largely to their union with England. "We come next to propose
the state of our Trade with France. The loss of our Ancient Alliance
with that Famous and Great Kingdom and of the Honourable and
Advantagious Priviledges we enjoyed there is one of the great
Damages we sustain'd by the Union of the Crowns." Another writer
summed up the situation very well. "Seeing most of the Trade of
Scotland lieth with neighbouring Nations and especially those which
England hath oftnest provocation to quarrel with, and the Scots
driving very little Traffick with Countries far remote; it
consequently follows that upon the Commencement of a War with those
adjacent States and Kingdoms the Scots do become in a manner shut
out from, and deprived of all foreign Trade; while in the meantime
the English do continue to carry on a vast and Beneficiall Trade to
Turkey Affrik and the East Indies, as well as to and from their own
American Plantations." These considerations, amongst others,
convinced Scotland of the necessity of making some change in her
relationship towards England, and Scotland's determination to
continue her French connection did much to bring the English to the
same conclusions.