The latter part of
the seventeenth century is of far more interest than the earlier
half in the consideration of the commercial relations of England and
Scotland, and also in the economic history of Scotland. The country
developed a great deal in these years, especially considering her
depressed state at the beginning of the period. Doubtless she
learned something from England, during the years of union, as to the
organisation of industry and trade. Her experience then may also
have shewn her the importance of trade, and of the wealth which it
brings, as factors in determining the position of nations in Europe.
Scotland's economical development shewed both countries that the
form of relationship between them was most unsatisfactory. The
English Parliament had no control over Scottish trade, and in
several different directions the Scots infringed the English
commercial system. In defiance of the Navigation Acts they traded
with the Plantations, and supplied them with their own and with
Dutch manufactures. They continued, as far as possible, to trade
with France and Holland when England was at war with these
countries, and refused to prohibit the import of their products.
Across the border these prohibited foreign goods could be imported
into England, and English prohibited commodities could be exported.
Scotland drove a profitable trade in the export of English wool.
Finally England was shewn that it was possible for Scotland to give
extensive powers to a trading company, which might have been a rival
to the great English companies, and which very nearly embroiled
England with her political allies. On the other hand the Scots found
themselves treated as foreigners in England. They required markets
for their manufactures, but high-tariffs kept out their goods, and
entire prohibition checked their trade with the Plantations; English
wars hindered their principal foreign trades; English influence and
enmity destroyed any chances of success which their great national
trading venture might have had. Both nations found the state of
affairs impossible. England found that for political as well as
economic reasons a union with Scotland would be advisable, and the
fifty years of separation, enmity and misunderstanding ended in the
consummation of a complete and incorporating union.
a. Industry
The condition of
Scotland at the Restoration was such as to make any change welcome.
The heavy taxation and enforcement of the English commercial system,
after the devastation caused by the wars, had kept the country in a
state of great poverty. Many of the new industries introduced by
James and Charles had died out, and the long established
manufactures of the country, linen cloth, plaiding, etc., had
considerably decayed. There was also very little money in the
country with which to start new manufactures. Nevertheless the first
care of the restored Parliament was to make provision for the King's
revenue. An annuity of £40,000 sterling was granted to him for life.
This was made up of £8000 from the customs, and £32,000 from the
excise on beer, ale, aqua vitae and other "strong waters." New
customs rates were imposed, more or less on a protective system. The
chief part of the revenue was raised by duties on foreign
manufactured goods, cloths, serges, hats, stockings, etc. Certain
imports were free altogether, materials for fishing, shipbuilding,
soap manufacturing, wool, flax, dying materials, etc., also sugar
brought from the Plantations in Scottish ships.
Further legislation
dealt with industry. Both England and France were at this time
engaged in building up strictly protective systems, in order to
develop and encourage their industry and trade. Scotland, influenced
by their example, by the damage which their system inflicted on her
trade, and by the necessity of attracting capital to the country,
also set about creating a protective system, developing the
principles of the Act of 1644. The first attempts to encourage
industry, as embodied in the Acts of 1661, did not meet with much
success. Accordingly in 1681 further Acts were passed which
completed a very strict system of protection of native industry, by
prohibition of the import of foreign manufactured goods, and of the
export of raw materials. This time the policy was more successful,
the country having recovered somewhat from the effects of the Civil
Wars. Companies were founded, for which a certain amount of capital
came from England. Between 1693 and 1695 especially a number of
companies were floated, including the Darien Company. In the latter
a good deal of the capital of the country was locked up, and a
series of bad harvests followed. The manufacturers found the English
and other foreign markets practically closed against most of their
manufactures, and the attempt to provide a colonial market of their
own had failed. The first few years of the eighteenth century were a
time of depression and discontent, during which the manufacturing
and trading interests alike began to realise that in order to secure
the necessary markets they must become commercially one with
England.
To superintend the
general interests of trade and industry the Parliament of 1661
passed an Act establishing a Council of Trade. This was to consist
of five of each estate, and was entrusted with the duties of
establishing companies, endowing them with privileges, making and
enforcing regulations regarding trade and manufactures. The
privileges which the companies were to receive were enumerated in
the "Act for erecting of Manufactories." Strangers brought in by
natives to teach or to set up new industries were to enjoy all the
privileges of natives. Materials for manufactures were to be
imported, and the manufactured goods exported duty free for nineteen
years. The stock employed was to be free of taxes, and the
manufactories were to be free from the quartering of soldiers on
them. Another Act dealt with the companies for making linen and
woollen cloths, etc. The preamble to this Act states that "many good
Spirites haveing aimed at the publict good, have for want of
sufficient stocks councill and assistance been crushed by such
undertakings." Therefore it is thought necessary "to create and
erect companies and societies for manufactories...as the first
moderne societies and companies for making of lining cloth," etc. No
linen or woollen cloth was to be exported except by members of these
companies, and they alone were to be free of customs and excise for
nineteen years. The export of linen yarn and of skins and hides was
also forbidden. The importation of "made work" which was also
manufactured in the kingdom was forbidden. By these Acts a definite
scheme of protection of native industry was established. The new
companies were assured, as far as legislation could assure them, of
a supply of raw material by the prohibition of the export of linen
yarn, wool, skins, etc., and by the freedom from import duty of
necessary foreign materials. At the same time their home market was
guaranteed by the prohibition of the import of manufactures similar
to their own. It must always be remembered, however, that this
system was far more complete in theory than in practice, and that
the laws regulating import and export were in fact but little
observed. There were now no complaints of the prohibition of the
export of wool and hides as there were under the Protectorate
Government, but this is far more likely to be due to a lax
observance of the law than to the supply being entirely engrossed by
the manufacturers.
By further
legislation encouragement was given to industry by the imposition in
1663 of heavy duties on English cloth and other commodities, in
retaliation for the English Navigation Acts. But the country was for
the first few years after the Restoration too poor to take advantage
of these encouragements. The English wars with Holland, which began
in 1664, were also a very serious check to Scottish trade. Rothes,
the Commissioner, wrote many letters to Lauderdale in 1665 and 1666,
asserting the poverty of the country, and its inability to raise
either troops or money. "It is almost impossible for this kingdom to
raise money," he writes— his spelling is corrected—"being so
impoverished and harassed with the late miserable troubles and
rebellions that our poverty is not to be expressed." "As I hope to
be saved, this country is so exhausted that they are not in a
capacity to do anything as to money, but God help us." "We in this
kingdom are wilful and proud and necessitous even to beggary so
consequently a ticklish people to deal with."
Some progress was
made, nevertheless, especially in Glasgow, which had suffered less
from the troubles than the towns in the east. In 1667 soap-works
were started there, in which nine "persons of distinction" were
interested, to the extent of £1500 sterling each. In the same year
and in 1669 sugar manufactories were founded, the Easter and the
Wester Sugar Works. In these nine people were engaged, and taking
advantage of the Act of 1661 each had a foreigner as "master
boiler," a German and a Dutchman. Further information about these
two works is given in a petition of their master to Parliament in
1681. In this he asserts that the price of manufactured sugar has
been much reduced, and now is sold at only 85. Scots. Also Scottish
manufactures are exported to Virginia and the Caribbee islands,
whence the raw sugar is brought. The only "Benefit and advantage" to
the manufacturers themselves, consisted in the export of molasses,
"which is the coursest part of the sugar," to Holland and the
eastern countries. But the Dutch finding themselves injured by this
trade have forbidden the import of molasses, and heavy impositions
have been laid upon it by the eastern countries. The manufacturers
have therefore begun to manufacture strong waters instead of
molasses and beg that these may be free of any excise. This was
granted, and all former privileges were renewed. A paper manufactory
was also started in 1675. The only other industry in which there is
much trace of progress being made during the early years of the
period was in fishing. The Act for establishing fishing companies in
1661 had had no effect, and so in 1670 efforts were again made to
encourage this industry. One-company was formed, with exclusive
rights of fishing and trade, and all the privileges of companies
formed under the Act of 1661. They were also granted the monopoly of
trading to Muscovy, Greenland, Iceland, and other northern parts. To
this company Charles subscribed £5000 and the total capital amounted
to £25,000. Proclamation was made at the same time forbidding
foreigners from fishing on the coasts. Unfortunately the future
career of this company was not very successful.
According to the
account of a merchant travelling in Scotland in 1672 there had been
but little advance made in industry by that time. His account
however seems to be more prejudiced than dependable. His name was
Dennis de Repas, and he had travelled over most of Europe. He wrote
to Sir Edward Harley, vilifying Scotland and the Scots. "I may
assure your honour that in all my travels...I never saw a nation in
general more nasty, lazy, and least ingenious in matter of
manufactures than they are....Except in great towns, they do not
bake bread though they may have plentiful of corn, but make nastily
a kind of stuff with oat half grinded which they do call ' cake'
which hath no more taste nor relish than a piece of wooden
trencher....I do speak so much of Scotland, by reason that being
your neighbours I do wonder that they do not take something after
the English, which through all the world are counted the most
ingenious in all manner of manufactures." The only manufactures
which he allows to them are those of plaiding and of stockings, but
the latter are "most nastily made."
The fact was that the
country was too exhausted, by the Civil and then by the Dutch wars,
to really profit by the legislation of 1661. No new manufactures
were sent abroad. Salmon, stockings, plaiding, linen, tallow, coals,
salt and skins were still the principal exports. Plaiding and linen
were however both manufactured and exported in greater quantities.
England was a great market for linen. In 1672, 488,800 ells were
carried thither overland from Glasgow alone, while large quantities
were entered at all the Border customs houses, and a great deal was
also sent by sea.
After some years
affairs began to improve, and in 1681 Parliament again turned their
attention to industry. A complete system of protection was evolved,
and this time there were manufacturers who were able to take
advantage of it. During the next fifteen years, especially from 1690
to 1695, many manufactories were established, with varying success.
One difficulty faced them all and gradually became more pressing—the
difficulty of finding markets. The demand of the home market was
small, France and England had closed their markets to some Scottish
manufactures, and though trade with the Plantations was carried on,
the fact that it was forbidden was naturally a hindrance to it. The
merchants and manufacturers therefore gradually came to recognise
the necessity of union with England, in order to provide markets for
their goods.
The "Act for
Encourageing Trade and Manufactories" of 1681 ratified the Act of
1661, and also bestowed further privileges. The import of foreign
materials made of wool, cotton, lint, gold or silver thread was
prohibited, also of stockings, shoes, and some silks. The duties
were removed from the import of goods to be used in the
manufactories, and from the export of the manufactured articles, for
nineteen years. All stock was freed from taxation, and the employes
from military service for seven years. All works that had been set
up or that were to be set up, were to be declared manufactories by
Act of Parliament, in order that they might enjoy these privileges
and immunities. Under this Act about fifty undertakings were erected
into manufactories, and received these extensive privileges. Most of
these were jointstock companies. Dr Scott gives an estimate of the
capital employed in these works. The amount subscribed to-some of
them is recorded—the Royal Fishing Company £25,000, the Glasgow Soap
Company £11,700, one of the Glasgow Sugar Works £10,000, the Scots
Paper Manufactory £4000, the Bank of Scotland £10,000, the Glasgow
Hope Company £3333, and the Linen Company about £10,000. Calculating
from these figures, Dr Scott estimates the total capital employed at
about £194,033. Some of this was contributed by English undertakers,
of whom a number were interested in Scottish undertakings, Foreign
help was received too from some Huguenot refugees, skilled artisans,
whose knowledge of the methods of cloth, silk, pottery, or other
manufactures was of great value to the new companies. Foreign
"tradesmen and merchants" were received as burgesses and freemen in
the larger royal burghs on payment of £20 Scots, and in the smaller
for £10 Scots.
As has been said, the
regulations regarding import and export were never strictly
enforced. Only two years after the Act of 1681, the Privy Council
found it necessary again to forbid by Proclamation the importation
of goods made of wool or lint3. Various petitions from cloth
manufacturers shew that woollen cloth continued to be imported,
partly, no doubt, because the manufacturers could not supply
sufficient quantities of certain varieties, and because some Scots
were unpatriotic enough to prefer the finer kinds of cloth which
were not made in Scotland. Most of this imported cloth was English.
In 1698 it was suggested that the import of woollen manufactures
should be forbidden and penalised by a heavy imposition, or that the
wearing of any wool not made in the kingdom should be prohibited,
"which will be more civil but less effectuall." Soon after this a
number of people banded themselves together, and drew up a "Resolve
containing a plain and direct Ingagement against the wearing of
Forraign Cloths and making use of certain Forraign Liquors." This
was presented both to "single persons and Societies for
Concurrence." But any "Leagues or Bonds" were "reprobat by law,"
and, as the Resolve manifestly came under that category, all persons
were forbidden to engage in it. In 1701 the agitations of the
manufacturers were successful, and the importation of both woollen
and silk, materials was again forbidden3. Frequent agitation was
also made to enforce the acts dealing with the export of raw
material, especially of wool. The foreign trade in wool was large,
and of great advantage to the wool growers, who declared that the
home demand for their wool was so small that they would be ruined
were they not allowed to export. The manufacturers on the other hand
declared that the reason that the cloth works did not flourish as
they ought, was that they had difficulty in securing a sufficient
supply of wool. The town of Aberdeen in 1693 declared that "since
the exportatione therof" (i.e. of wool) "may tend to the utter ruine
of woolling manufactories in this kingdome which in former tymes
brought in considerable coyned money to the Countrie, but by the
late considerable Exportatione of the said Commoditie vertuous
people are forced either to give over the making of woolling
manufactorie or to make it so slight as renders it unvend-able
abroad." Aberdeenshire was one of the chief seats of the
manufacture. These and other like arguments were successful, and in
1701 the export of wool was forbidden. It was still smuggled out of
the country to some extent, but on the whole the Act was said to be
of great advantage.
The trade in the old
established cloth manufacture had decayed very much. In 1674 about
400,000 ells of plaiding had been exported from Aberdeenshire, at
11s. 6d. per ell. In 1694 and until 1700 the trade had declined, and
only about 80,000 ells yearly at 6s. or 7s. per ell were sent away.
After the Act of 1701 the trade recovered again, and about 200,000
ells, at the old price, were exported in 1701 and 1702. The triumph
of the manufacture was short-lived, however, for in 1704 the export
of wool was again allowed4.
That the Acts
regarding import and export were observed to some extent is shewn by
the grants of abatements made to the farmers of the customs, after
Acts prohibiting some imports or exports were passed. In 1681 the
tacksmen declared that "the restraint...being so Comprehensive and
relateing to a great part of the subject of trade has made a present
Interruption of all trade the merchands being at a stand and not
knowing what to Import." When the export of linen yarn was forbidden
in 1693, they received an abatement of £591. 35. 8d. This was
calculated from the amount of linen yarn exported in 1692—101,272
pounds, on which the duty was £591. 17s. 0d. Later the tacksmen of
the customs between 1697 and 1702 claimed an abatement of £14,159.
11s. 4d in consideration of their losses by the various Acts of
1698, 1699 and 1701, prohibiting the export of wool and the import
of foreign woollen manufactures.
Having now touched
upon the disadvantages of the system it is necessary to glance at
the degree of success which attended it. As has been said, about
fifty new manufactories were started. Of these the woollen and linen
were the most important. Seven works for manufacturing woollen
cloths of different kinds were erected between 1681 and 1695, and
two in 1703. They chiefly manufactured the coarser sorts of
materials, serges, baizes, etc., and it was in this line that they
were most successful, as there were not so many rivals with whom to
compete. Coarse cloth had a good sale in the Plantations, it was
cheap and strong and useful for servants' wear. According to the
writer of A Representation of the Advantages... of Manufactories
(1683), a great deal was sent to Holland and some was even smuggled
into England. The finer serges found good markets in Holland,
Hamburg and Spain. The minutes of the New Mills Manufactory afford a
good deal of information as to the working of the cloth works. Four
varieties of cloth were made, the finest with Spanish wool only, the
next quality with Spanish and English wools mixed, the third with
English, and the coarsest with Scottish wool alone. This company
never seemed to have large quantities in stock, nor to be able to
provide a supply quickly. The directors were occasionally applied to
to supply cloth suitable for uniforms, "to distinguish sojers from
other sculking and -vagrant persons," but generally failed to have
enough material by the required time, and licences had usually to be
given to import the necessary amount from England. The manufacture
on the whole, however, had advanced a great deal since the beginning
of the century, and the improvement was nearly all subsequent to the
passing of the protective legislation. That its prosperity was due
to protection, and that without protection it could not stand, was
obvious after the union, when the Scottish cloth manufacture
suffered very much from the free competition of the English
manufactures.
The linen manufacture
was more successful. For one thing the country was more adapted for
it, and also it was easier to find a market for linen than for
cloth. A special Act dealing with this manufacture was passed in
1693, forbidding the export of linen .yarn, and'providing for the
import of linen yarn and export of cloth duty free. It was thought
that it would be a particularly suitable time for setting up a linen
manufactory, "when the seas are troublesome and.tradesmen abroad
ruined with warrs," as it might be possible to get the trade of
supplying England with those cloths which the French and Dutch now
sent her. One manufactory was founded in this year at Leith, which
exported in the year 1693-4, £2012. 8s. 5d. value of linen. The
custom remitted on this was £427. 4s., and on the goods imported for
its use £308. 19s. Further encouragement was given by an Act making
burial in Scots linen compulsory. A good deal of linen was exported
to the Plantations, and also to Holland, Spain and England. It was
in fact the most important of all Scottish imports to England,
amounting to about £40,000 value yearly. On the .whole the linen
industry was perhaps the most important of all the industries, at
any rate from the point of view of the export trade. Those engaged
in it were anxious for the union, as they expected to profit greatly
by the increased opportunities for export to the Plantations.
The manufacture of
sugar was also a flourishing one. New works were founded at Leith,
Glasgow, and elsewhere. In connection with one of these works a
distillery was established, to make spirits out of molasses. This,
it was said, would be of great advantage to trade. Not only would
more sugar be imported from the Plantations, and more woollens and
other manufactures sent there, but spirits would be made at home
instead of being imported from England. The Fishing Company
established in 1670 was not so successful however. Another Act was
passed in 1685 giving many privileges to those engaged in the
fishing trade, but no great advantage was taken of it. Most of the
pamphlets which advocate the union deplore the neglect of this
trade, and the loss of the wealth which it should bring to the
country, most of which, they assert, goes to the Dutch. Other works
were erected for the manufacture of soap, silk, glass, salt, starch,
ropes, paper, oil, gunpowder, etc. Of great importance was the
founding of the Bank of Scotland in 1695 the "first instance of a
private joint stock bank formed by private persons for the express
purpose of making a trade of banking, wholly unconnected with the
State, and dependent on their own private capital." It was not,
however, till after the union that the Bank proved its true
usefulness to the country in the facilities which it gave for
raising money to promote industry and agriculture. It was not until
after the union also that any advance was made in agriculture, the
practice of which continued very backward and on much the same lines
throughout the seventeenth century. As has been said, the promotion
of industry received a check after the year 1695, due to the large
investment of capital in the African Company, and to the bad
harvests of the succeeding years. The harvest of 1695 was very bad,
that of 1696 was worse, and 1697 was also a bad year. Complaints
from all over the kingdom attest the widespread nature of the
dearth. In Aberdeen "ther is on of the greatest skaircities of
Victuall that ever you heard of." The famine in Inverness "is more
calamitous then was ever felt heretofor in our age," while round
Edinburgh many had not even been able to sow their land in 1696
because of the want of seed. The dearth increased the discontent of
the country. After 1700 harvests improved again, but the want of
markets was an ever present grievance. The Lord Chancellor in his
speech to Parliament in 1703 asserted that "Our Manufactures are
very much improved but we have almost no forraign trade." For this
condition of affairs the union with England was blamed, but it was
also commonly realised that it was the nature of the union that was
at fault, and that the only means of remedy lay in a complete and
incorporating union.