1724, July
The danger arising to the government from having a rude people of
disaffected sentiments and hardy warlike character seated in the
north-west parts of Scotland, was now brought before it with sufficient
urgency to cause the adoption of remedial measures. An effectual disarming
act, the raising of armed corn panics in the pay of the government, the
completion of a line of forts, and the formation of roads by which these
should be accessible and the benefits of civilisation imparted to the
country, were the chief means looked to for doing away with the Highland
difficulty. A sensible English officer, General George Wade, was sent down
to act as commander in chief of the troops in Scotland, and carry these
measures into effect.
If we may believe a statement which there
is all reason to believe except one—the character of its author, who was
no other than Simon Lord Lovat—it was high time that something was done to
enforce the laws in the Highlands. In William’s reign, there had been an
armed watch and a severe justiciary commission; but they had long been
given up; so, after a temporary lull, things had returned to their
usual course. The garrisons at Fort William, Killicummin, and Inverness
proved ineffectual to restrain the system of spoliation, or to put down a
robbers’ tax called black-mail (nefarious rent), which many paid in
the hope of protection.
The method by which the country was
brought under this tax is thus stated: ‘When the people are almost ruined
by continual robberies and plunders, the leader of the band of thieves, or
some friend of his, proposes that for a sum of money to be annually paid,
he will press a number of men in arms to protect such a tract of ground,
or as many parishes as submit to pay the contribution. When the
contributions are paid, he ceases to steal, and thereby the contributors
are safe, If he refuse to pay, he is immediately plundered. To colour all
this villainy, those concerned in the robberies pay the tax with the
rest, and all the neighbourhood must comply, or be undone.’ Black-mail
naturally prevailed in a marked manner in fertile lowland districts
adjacent to the Highlands, as Easter Ross, Moray, and the Lennox.
Directly with a view to the prevention of
robberies, and the suppression of this frightful impost, the government
established six companies of native soldiery, selected from clans
presumedly loyal, and respectively commanded by Lord Lovat, Sir Duncan
Campbell of Lochnell, Colonel Grant of Ballandalloch, Colonel Alexander
Campbell of Finab, John Campbell of Carrick, and George Monro of Culcairn.
The whole, consisting of four hundred and eighty men, were dressed in
plain dark-coloured tartan, and hence were called the Reicudan Dhu,
or Black Watch. Burt reports an allegation, that one of the commanders
(Lord Lovat?) used to strip his tenants of their best plaids, wherewith to
invest his men at a review. On the other hand, there were men of such
birth and breeding in the corps, that they had gillies to do
drudgery for them. They were posted in small parties throughout the more
lawless parts of the country, and are represented as having been
reasonably effective for their purpose.
For the disarming of the disaffected
clans, Wade had his six native companies and four hundred troops of the
line ready at Inverness to proceed with the work in June 1725; but
the riot about the malt-tax at Glasgow delayed his measures, and it was
not till the 10th of August that he marched in force towards the
rendezvous of the Mackenzies at Brahan Castle. The heads of the clan saw
it to be necessary to obey, or to appear to obey, and also to promise that
in future the rents of their chief; the forfeited Earl of Seaforth, should
he paid to the state, instead of to Donald Murchison. The general on his
part allowed them to understand that, very probably, if they made this
submission their chief would he pardoned and restored. One little
concession they had to ask from the English general - let him spare them
the humiliation of delivering their arms in the presence of the
Reicudan Dhu. To this the general consented. He sent the native
loyalists to guard the passes to the westward.
It must have been a solemn and interesting
sight to an English officer of impressionable feelings, if such a being
then existed, when the troops took up their position in front of that
grand old Highland fortress, amidst scenery of the most magnificent kind,
to receive the submission of a high-spirited people, who had resisted as
long as resistance was possible. First came the gentlemen or
duine-wassils, about fifty in number, to pay their respects to the
general. Then followed in slow procession along the great avenue, the body
of the clansmen, in parishes, forty or fifty in each, marching four and
four, and bringing their arms on horses. On arriving in front of the
house, they unloaded and deposited the weapons, drank the king’s health,
and slowly turned away. The chiefs of the several tribes, and other
principal gentlemen of the country, dined the same day with the general,
and great civilities and mutual assurances of good offices passed on both
sides. They promised the general that the rents of the estate should be
punctually paid to the crown, for the use of the public, and a dutiful
submission (rendered) to his majesty’s government. Weapons to the number
of 784 were given in; but in reality they were only the oldest and most
worn of the arms possessed by this great clan. Donald Murchison had taken
care previously to gather up an their best arms into some central store
unknown to the government.’
Following this example, and partly, it is
alleged, induced by little favours extended or promised by the general,
the rest of the Jacobite clans, the Macdonalds, Camerons, Macleods, &c.,
made an appearance of surrendering their arms at various appointed
stations during the autumn. The entire number of articles given in was
2685. The total expense of the collection was about £2000, and the general
gives us an idea of the true state of the case, beyond what he possessed
himself, when he tells us that the articles for the most part were worth
little more than the price of old iron.
General Wade received submissive letters
from many of the chiefs and others who had been in the insurrection of
1715, all professing anxiety for pardon, and promising a quiet life in
future. There was none more submissive than one from Rob Roy, who
contrived to make it appear that his treason was against his will. ‘It was
my misfortune,’ says he, ‘at the time the Rebellion broke out, to be
liable to legal diligence and caption, at the Duke of Montrose’s instance,
for debt alleged due to him. To avoid being flung into prison, as I must
certainly have been, had I followed my real inclinations in joining the
king’s troops at Stirling, I was forced to take party with the adherents
of the Pretender; for the country being all in arms, it was neither safe
nor possible for me to stand neuter.’ Of course, this was meant by Rob as
merely a civil apology for deliberate rebellion. To give it confirmation,
he told the general: ‘I not only avoided acting offensively against his
majesty’s forces upon all occasions, but, on the contrary, sent his Grace
the Duke of Argyle all the intelligence I could from time to time, of the
situation and strength of the rebels; which I hope his Grace will do me
the justice to acknowledge.’ It is to be hoped that Rob was not here so
dishonest as to speak the truth. There is ample reason to believe that the
frank English general was imposed upon by the professions made by the
Jacobite chiefs, for he reported to government that disaffection was much
abated, and interested himself zealously for the pardon of several of the
attainted gentlemen.
A poor woman named Margaret Dickson, an
inhabitant of the parish of Inveresk, was tried under the act of 1690 for
concealment of pregnancy in the case of a dead child. A defence was made
for her that she was a married woman, though living separate from her
husband; but it was of no avail. A broadside - which proceeds upon a
strong approval of the text, that ‘the works of God are works of wonder,
and his ways past finding out‘—gives a minute recital of the circumstances
of her execution in the Grassmarket; how the hangman did his usual office
of pulling down her legs; and how the body, having hung the usual time,
was taken down and put into a coffin, the
cooms
of which were nailed fast at the
gibbet-foot. It then proceeds. ‘Being put into a cart, to transport her
corpse to be interred in the churchyard of Inveresk, whither the
magistrates had allowed her friends to carry her, there happened a scuffle
betwixt her friends and some surgeon-apprentices and others, their
accomplices, on this side of the Society Port. One, with a hammer, broke
down one of the sides of the cooms of the chest; which, having given some
air, and, together with the jolting of the cart, set the blood and vitals
agoing. The people intrusted with transporting her body having stopped at
Peffermill to take a refreshment, and left her upon a cart in the highway,
two joiners, from curiosity, came from a house to view the coffin, and, to
their surprise, heard a noise within. Acquainting the persons concerned,
they proposed to open the other side of the cooms of the chest, which,
after some opposition, was agreed to. The coom being taken off they
perceived her to draw up her limbs. One Peter Purdie, a practitioner of
phlebotomy, providentially breathed a vein, from which streamed blood,
which recovered her so far, that twice she said:
“O dear!” Being brought to her feet, she
was supported by two to a brae-side, where the blood returned to her lips
and cheeks, which promised a sudden recovery. Being laid upon blankets in
a corn-cart, her head and body upheld by a woman, she was driven to
Musselburgh, where she remained, at the magistrates’ command, all night;
had restoratives and means of sustenance given her; was visited by Mr
Robert Bonally, one of the ministers of that place, who prayed over her;
and next morning was laid in a bed in her brother James Dickson, weaver,
his house, whither a great many flock every day to see her, and not a few
gave her money. She had little appearance of recovering her health or
senses next day, and cried out to let her be gone, for she was to be
executed on Wednesday, but is now pretty well—only complains of a pain in
her neck. She went to church on Sunday last, and heard sermon, where the
people were so anxious to see her, that the minister was obliged to
conduct her out of the churchyard to keep her from being trodden
down by the multitude. She still
remains in a hopeful way of recovering strength and judgment. May this
amazing dispensation of Providence be sanctioned to her, and teach all who
shall hear it to act a needy dependence upon, and live to the glory of
God, to whom belong the issues of life and death!’
Another brief chronicler of the time
informs us, that Maggie devoted the Wednesday ensuing upon
that on which she was executed to solemn
fasting and prayer, in gratitude for her deliverance, and had formed the
resolution so to employ each recurring Wednesday during the remainder of
her life. It is also stated that her husband, struck with a forgiving
interest in her, took her ultimately back to his house. She lived to have
several children creditably born, and cried salt for many a day through
the streets of Edinburgh, universally recognised and constantly pointed
out to strangers as ‘Half-hangit Maggie Dickson.’
At the village of Gilmerton, four miles to
the south of Edinburgh, the soft, workable character of the sandstone of
the carboniferous formation, there cropping to the surface, tempted a
blacksmith named George Paterson to an enterprise of so extraordinary a
character, as to invest his name with distinction in both prose and rhyme.
In the little garden at the end of his house, he excavated for himself a
dwelling in the rock, composed of several apartmeuts. Besides a smithy,
with a fireplace or forge, there
were—a dining-room, fourteen and a half feet long, seven broad, and six
feet high, furnished with a bench all round, a table, and a bed-recess; a
drinking-parlour, rather larger; a kitchen and bed-place for the maid; a
liquor-cellar upwards of seven feet long; and a washing-house. In each
apartment there was a
skylight-window, and the whole were properly drained. The work cost the
poor man five years of hard labour, being finished in the present year.
Alexander Pennecuik, the burgess-bard of Edinburgh, furnished an
inscription, which was carved on a stone at the entrance:
Here is a House and Shop
hewn in this Rock with my own
hands.
George PATERSON.
Upon the earth thrives villainy and wo,
But happiness and I do dwelI below
My hands hewed out this rock into a cell,
Wherein from din of life I safely dwell:
On Jacob’s pillow nightly lies my head,
My house when living, and my grave when dead
Inscribe upon it when I 'm dead and gone:
I lived and died within my mother’s womb.
It is kept in remembrance that Paterson
actually lived and practised his calling in this subterranean mansion for
eleven years. Holiday-parties used to come from the neighbouring capital
to see him and his singular dwelling; even judges, it is alleged, did not
disdain to sit in George’s stone-parlour, and enjoy the contents of his
liquor-cellar. The ground was held in feu, and the yearly duty and
public burdens were forgiven him, on account of the extraordinary labour
he had incurred in making himself a home.
The idea of improving agricultural
implements was hitherto unheard of in Scotland; but now a
thrashing-machine was invented by Mr Michael Menzies, a member of the
Scottish bar. On his request, the Society of Improvers sent a deputation
to see it working at Roseburn, near
Edinburgh; and these gentlemen reported upon it favourably. I am unable to
say whether it was identical with a thrashing-machine advertised in July
1735, as to be had of Andrew Good, wright in College Wynd,
Edinburgh; one to thrash as much as four men,
£30; one to do as much as six, £45; and so
on in proportion, ‘being about
£7,
10s. for each man’s labour that the
machine does, which is but about the expense of a servant for one year.
It was held forth, regarding this machine, that for the driving of
one equal to four men, most
water-mills would suffice, and one so working was to be seen at Dalkeith.
It would appear, however, that the idea of
a machine for thrashing had, after this time, completely fallen out of
notice, as the one which has long been in use was, in its original form,
the invention of Michael Stirling, farmer at Craighead, in the Parish of
Dunblane, who died in 1796, in the eighty-ninth year of his age.
‘This venerable man, when in the prime of
life, had a strong propensity to every curious invention; and, after much
thought and study, he prepared and finished, in 1748, a machine for
thrashing his corn. The axis of the thrashing-board was placed
perpendicular, and was moved by an inner wheel on the same axis with an
outer one that went by water. The men stood round about these boards like
lint-cleaners, each man with his sheaf, and performed the work with great
rapidity (at the rate of sixteen bolls of oats per diem). Mr
Stirling’s neighbours were by no means struck with the invention, but
laughed at it, and called him a maggoty fellow. The
wonderful powers of the machine, however,
drew the attention of strangers, who came and picked up models, and so
were enabled to erect others both in Scotland and England.’’ Subsequently,
Mr Meikle, at Alloa, obviated the inconvenience of the perpendicular
arrangement of the axis, by laying it down in a horizontal form.
A machine for the winnowing of corn was,
as far as can he ascertained, for the first time made in this island by
Andrew Rodger, a farmer on the estate of Cavers in Roxburghshire, in the
year 1737. It was after retiring from his farm to indnlge a bent for
mechanics, that he entered on this remarkable invention, and began
circulating what were called Fanners throughout the country, which
his descendants continued to do for many years. This machine is well known
to have been the subject of a religions prejudice among our more rigid
sectarics, as indicated anachronously by Scott in the conversation
between Manse Headrig and her mistress—’ a new-fangled machine for
dighting the corn frae the chag thus impiously thwarting the will o’
Divine Providence by raising wind for your leddyship’s use by human art,
instead of soliciting it by prayer, or patiently waiting for whatever
dispensation of wind Providence was pleased to send upon the
shielinghill.’ The ‘scccders’ are understood to have taken very strong
ground in resistance to the introduction of fanuers, deeming the wind as
specially a thing made by God (He that createth the wind,’ Amos iv.
13), and therefore regarding an artificial wind as a daring and impious
attempt to usurp what belonged to him alone. The author has been informed
that an uncle of the late national poet, Robert Gilfillan, was extruded
from a Fife congregation of this kind because of his persisting to use
fanners.
About the end of this mouth, the people of
Orkney were thrown into some excitement by the arrival of a
suspicions-looking vessel among their usually quiet islands. She professed
to be a merchantman bound for Stockholm; but her twenty-two guns and crew
of thirty-eight men belied the tale. In reality, she was a pirate-ship,
recently taken under the care of a reckless man named Gow, or Smith, who
had already made her the means of perpetrating some atrocions villainies
in more southern seas. His alleged connection with Caithness by nativity,
and Orkney by education, was perhaps the principal reason for his
selecting this part of the world as a temporary refuge till some of his
recent acts should be forgotten. His conduct, however, was marked by
little prudence. He used to come ashore with armed men, and hold
boisterous festivities with the islanders. He also made some attempts to
enter into social relations with the gentlemen of the country. It was even
said that, during his brief stay, he made some way in the affections of a
young gentlewoman, who little imagined his real character. It was the more
unaccountable that he lingered thus in the islands, after ten of his
people, who had recently been pressed into his service, left his vessel,
and made their escape in a boat—a circumstance that ought to have warned
him that he could not long evade the notice of the law. In point of fact,
the character of his ship and crew were known at Leith while he was still
dallying with time in the taverns of Stromness.
At length, about the 20th of February, Gow
left the southern and more frequented part of the Orkney group, and sailed
to Calf Sound, at the north part of the island of Eday, designing to apply
for fresh provisions and assistance to a gentleman residing there, who had
been his school-fellow, Mr Fea, younger of Clestran. Chancing to cast
anchor too near the island, the pirate found that his first duty must be
to obtain the assistance of a boat to assist his men in bringing off the
vessel. He sent an armed party of five under the boatswain to solicit this
help from Mr Fea, who received them civilly, but immediately sent private
orders to have his own boat sunk and the sails hidden. He took the party
to a public house, where he entertained them, and so adroitly did he
manage matters, that ere long they were all disarmed and taken into
custody. The people of the country and some custom-house officers had by
this time been warned to his assistance.
Next day, a violent wind drove the vessel
ashore on Calf Island, and Gow, without a boat, began to feel himself in a
serious difficulty He hung out a flag for conference with Mr Fea, who
consequently sent him a letter, telling him that his only chance now was
to yield himself; and give evidence against his company. The wretch
offered goods to the value of a thousand pounds for merely a boat in which
lie could leave the coast; but Mr Fea only replied by renewing his former
advice. Some conferences, attended with considerable danger to Mr Fea,
took place; and Gow ultimately came ashore on Calf Island, and was
secured. It is narrated that when he found himself a prisoner, he
entreated to be shot before lie should have to surrender his sword. His
men were afterwards made prisoners without much difficulty.
Gow and his company were transported to
London, and tried by the Court of Admiralty on the 27th of May. Himself
and eleven others were found guilty, and condemned. There was
at first some difficulty in consequence of
his refusing to plead. The court, finding him refractory on this point of
form, at first tried to bring him to reason by gentle means; but when
these proved ineffectual, he was ordered to the press-yard, there to be
pressed to death, after the old custom with those refusing to plead. His
obstinacy then gave way, and his trial proceeded in due form, and he was
condemned upon the same evidence as his companions. Nine were executed, of
whom two—namely, Gow and his lieutenant, named Williams—were afterwards
hung in chains.’
The Scottish newspaper which first
narrated the singular story of the capture of these men, remarked: ‘The
gentleman who did this piece of good service to his country, will no doubt
be taken notice of; and rewarded by the government.’ Sir Walter Scott
relates from the tradition of the country what actually happened to Mr Fea
in consequence of his gallantry. ‘So far from receiving any reward from
government, he could not obtain even Countenance enough to protect him
against a variety of sham suits, raised against him by Newgate solicitors,
who acted in the name of Gow and others of the pirate crew; and the
various expenses, vexatious prosecutions, and other legal consequences in
which his gallantry involved him, utterly ruined his fortune and his
family.’
May
The Duke of Douglas, last direct descendant of the ancient and once
powerful House of Douglas, was a person of such weak character as to form
a dismal antithesis to the historical honours of the family—entitled to
the first vote in parliament, to lead the van of the Scottish army, and to
carry the king’s crown in all processions. Just turned thirty years of
age, his Grace lived at his ancestral castle in Lanarkshire, taking no
such part as befitted his rank and fortune in public affairs, but content
to pass his time in the commonest pleasures, not always in choice society.
Amongst his visitors was a young man named Ker, a natural son of Lord John
Ker, the younger brother of the late Marquis of Lothian, and also brother
to the Dowager-countess of Angus, the Duke’s mother. This youth, as cousin
to the duke, though under the taint of illegitimacy, presumed to aspire to
the affections of his Grace’s only sister, the celebrated Lady Jane; and
it is also alleged that he presumed to give the duke some advice about the
impropriety of his keeping company with a low man belonging to his
village. Under a revengeful prompting, it is said, from this fellow, the
poor duke stole by night into the chamber of Mr Ker, and shot him dead as
he lay asleep. Some servants, hearing the noise, came to his Grace’s room,
and found him in great distress at the frightful act which he had
committed, and which he made no
attempt to deny. He was as
speedily as possible conducted to Leith, and sent off in a vessel to
Holland, there to remain until he could safely return.
The peerages being politely silent about
this affair, we do not learn how or when the duke was restored to Scottish
society. More than thirty years after, when turned of sixty, he married
the daughter of a Dumbartonshire gentleman, a lady well advanced in life,
by whom he had no children. Dr Johnson, who met the duchess as a widow at
Boswell’s house in 1773, speaks of her as an old lady who talked broad
Scotch with a paralytic voice, and was scarcely intelligible even to her
countrymen. Had the doctor seen her ten years earlier, when she was in
possession of all her faculties, he would have found how much comicality
and rough wit could be expressed in broad Scotch under the coif of a
duchess. I have had the advantage of hearing it described by the late Sir
James Steuart of Coltness, who was in Paris with her Grace in 1762, when
she was also accompanied by a certain Laird of Boysack, and one or two
other Scotch gentlemen, all bent on making the utmost of every droll or
whimsical circumstance that came in their way. Certainly the language and
style of ideas in which the party
indulged was enough to make the
flair of the fastest of our day stand on end. There was great humour one
day about a proposal that the duchess should go to court, and take
advantage of the privilege of the tabouret, or right of sitting on
a low stool in the queen’s private chamber, which it was alleged she
possessed, by virtue of her late husband’s ancestors having enjoyed a
French dukedom (Touraine) in the fifteenth century. The old lady made all
sorts of excuses in her homely way;
but when Boysack started the theory, that the real objection lay in her
Grace’s fears as to the disproportioned size of the tabouret for the
co-relative part of her figure, he was declared, amidst shouts of
laughter, to have divined the true difficulty— her Grace enjoying the joke
fully as much as any of them. Let this be a specimen of the mate of the
last of the House of Douglas.
June 24
We have already seen that the favourite and ordinary beverage of the
people before this date was a light ale, not devoid of au exhilarating
power, which, being usually sold in pints (equal to two English quarts) at
2d., passed in prose and verse, as well as common parlance, under
the name of Twopenny. The government, conceiving they might raise twenty
thousand pounds per annum out of this modest luxury of the Scotch, imposed
a duty of sixpence a bushel upon malt; and now this was to be enforced by
a band of Excise officers.
The Scotch, besides the ignorant
impatience of taxation natural to a people to whom fiscal deductions were
a novelty, beheld in this measure a mark of the oppressive imperiousness
of the British senate, and bitterly thought of what the Union had brought
upon them. At Glasgow, this was a peculiarly strong feeling, its member of
parliament, Mr Campbell of Shawfield, having taken a leading part in
getting the malt-tax imposed. On the 23d June, when the act came into
force, the populace gave many tokens of the wrath they entertained towards
the excisemen who were putting it in practice; but no violence was used.
Next day, there was shewn a continual disposition to gather in the
streets, which the magistrates as constantly endeavoured to check; and a
military party was introduced to the town. At length, evening having drawn
on, the indignation of the populace could no longer be restrained. An
elegant house which Shawfield had built for himself, and furnished
handsomely, was attacked, and reduced to desolation, notwithstanding every
effort of the magistrates to reduce the mob to disperse. Next day, the mob
rose again, and came to the town-house in the centre of the town, but in
no formidable numbers. The military party was then drawn out by their
commander, Captain Bushell, in a hollow square, in the centre of the
crossing at the town-house, each side facing along one of the four streets
which meet there; when, some stones being thrown at the soldiers, the
officer gave way to anger, and without any order from the provost, fired
upon the multitude, of whom eight were killed and many wounded. The
multitude then flew to a guard-house where arms were kept, armed
themselves, and, ringing the town-bell to give an alarm, were prepared to
attack and destroy the comparatively small military party, when, at the
urgency of the provost, the latter withdrew from the town, and sought
refuge at Dumbarton.
The news of this formidable riot, or
rather insurrection, created great excitement among a set of government
authorities which had lately come into office, amongst whom was Mr
Duncan Forbes as Lord Advocate. They took
up the matter with a high hand. Attended by a large body of troops, Forbes
marched to Glasgow, and seized the magistrates, under accusation of having
favoured the mob, and bringing them to Edinburgh, clapped them up in the
Tolbooth. Such, however, was the view generally taken of the malt-tax,
that the Glasgow provost and bailies were everywhere treated as martyrs
for their country, and as they passed through the streets of Edinburgh to
prison, some of the lately displaced government officials walked
bareheaded before them. By an appeal to the Court of Justiciary, as to the
legality of their mittimus, they were quickly liberated. The only
effectual vengeance the government could inflict, was an
act ordaining the community of Glasgow to
pay Shawfield five thousand pounds as compensation for the destruction of
his house. The feelings of the people of the west were grievously outraged
by the conduct of the government in this affair, and the more so that they
considered it as an injustice inflicted by friends. Was it for this, they
asked, that they had stood so stoutly for the Whig cause on every trying
occasion since the Revolution?
In August, the officials had a new trouble
on their hands. The Edinburgh brewers intimated an intention to
discontinue brewing ale. Duncan Forbes stood aghast at the idea of what
might happen if the people were wholly deprived of their accustomed
beverage. After all, the difficulty involved in a proposal to force men to
go on in a trade against their will was not too great to be encountered in
those days. The Edinburgh Evening Courant of the 26th of August,
quietly informs us that ‘Mr Carr, engraver to the Mint, who kept a brewery
in this city, and several others of the brewers, are incarcerate in the
Canongate Tolbooth, for not enacting themselves to continue their trade of
brewing, in terms of the Act of Sederunt of the Lords of Council and
Session.’ ‘The Twopenny ale,’ adds this respectable chronicle, ‘begins to
grow scarce here; notwithstanding which the city remains in perfect
tranquillity.’ Long before the unimaginal crisis of an entire exhaustion
of beer had arrived, forty of the brewers of Edinburgh, and ten of Leith,
thought proper to resume work, and the dissolution of society was
averted.’
Such were the troubles which Scotland
experienced a hundred and thirty-five years ago, at the prospect of a tax
of twenty thousand pounds per annum!
Aug
Christian Shaw, daughter of the Laird of Bargarran, has been presented in
her girlhood as the cause of a number of prosecutions for witchcraft,
ending in the burning of no fewer than five women on Paisley Green.’ As
this young lady grew up to woman’s estate, she attained distinction of a
better kind, as the originator of one of the great branches of industry
for which her native province has since been remarkable. She was actually
the first person who introduced the spinning of fine linen thread into
Scotland. ‘Having acquired a remarkable dexterity in spinning fine yarn,
she conceived the idea of manufacturing it into thread. Her first attempts
in this way were necessarily on a small scale. She executed almost every
part of the process with her own hands, and bleached her materials on a
large slate in one of the windows of the house. She succeeded so well,
however, in these essays, as to have sufficient encouragement to go on,
and to take the assistance of her younger sister and neighbours. The then
Lady Blantyre carried a parcel of her thread to Bath, and disposed of it
advantageously to some manufacturers of lace…. About this time, a person
who was connected with the family, happening to be in Holland, found means
to learn the secrets of the thread-manufacture, which was carried on to a
great extent in that country, particularly the art of sorting and
numbering the threads of different sizes, and packing them up for sale,
and the construction and management of the twisting and twining machines.
This knowledge he communicated, on his
return, to his friends in Bargarran, and by means of it they were enabled
to conduct their manufacture with more regularity, and to a greater
extent. The young women of the neighbourhood were taught to spin fine
yarn, twining-mills were erected, correspondences were established, and a
profitable business was carried on. Bargarran thread became
extensively known, and being ascertained by a stamp, bore a good price. By
and by, the work was undertaken by others, and in time it became a leading
manufacture of the district. About 1718, Christian Shaw married Mr Miller,
the minister of Kilmaurs parish, and it is presumed she passed through the
remainder of her life much in the same manner as other persons in that
respectable grade.
The newspapers of the time at which we are
now arrived, present the following advertisement: ‘The Lady Bargarran and
her daughters having attained to a great perfection in making, whitening,
and twisting of SEWING THREED, which is as cheap and white, and known by
experience to be sold under the name of Bargarran Threed, the Papers in
which the Lady Bargarran, and her daughters at Bargarran, or Mrs Miller,
her eldest daughter, at Johnston, do put up their Threed, shall, for
direction, have thereupon the above coat of arms. Those who want the said
Threed, which is to be sold from fivepence to six shillings per ounce, may
write to the Lady Bargarran at Bargarran, or Mrs Miller at Johnston, near
Paisley, to the care of the Postmaster of Glasgow; and may call for the
same in Edinburgh, at John Seton, merchant, his shop in the Parliament
Close, where they will be served either in wholesale or retail: and will
be served in the same manner at Glasgow, by William Selkirk, merchant in
Tron gate.’
Crawford, in his History of
Renfrewshire, tells us that the coat-armorial worn by the Shaws of
Bargarran bore—’ azure, three covered cups or.’ There is
something amusingly characteristic in the wife and daughter of a
far-descended Scottish gentleman beginning a business in ‘threed,’ and
putting the family arms on their wares.
1725, Oct
After the long period during which religious and political contentions
absorbed or repressed the intellectual energies of the people, the first
native who exhibited in his own
country a purely scientific genius was Colin Maclaurin—a man of Highland
extraction (born in 1698), whose biography relates that he was fitted to
enter a university at eleven, mastered at twelve the first six books of
Euclid in a few days without assistance, and gained the chair of
mathematics in Marischal College, Aberdeen, at nineteen, after a
competitive examination of ten days. Having gone to London, and there been
introduced to Sir Isaac Newton, Dr Clark, Sir Martin Folks, and other
cultivators of science, Maclaurin was encouraged to publish several
mathematical treatises which gave him an established reputation while
still a young man.
At this time, the advanced years of Mr
James Gregory, professor of mathematics in the university of Edinburgh,
making it necessary that he should have an assistant, who should also be
his successor, Mr Maclaurin became a candidate for the situation, with the
recommendation of the illustrious Newton. The appointment lay with the
magistrates and town council of Edinburgh, who were the patrons of the
university—an arrangement which has been abolished in our age, with little
regard to the rights of property, and still less to the practical good
working of the connection. On this occasion there were some circumstances
alike honourable to Maclaurin, to Newton, and to the Edinburgh
municipality. Sir Isaac, hearing there was a difficulty about salary for
the new professor, the emoluments being reserved for the old one, wrote to
the lord provost of the city as follows: ‘I am glad to understand that Mr
Maclaurin is in good repute amongst you for his skill in mathematics, for
I think he deserves it very well, and, to satisfy you that I do not
flatter him, and also to encourage him to accept the place of assisting Mr
Gregory, in order to succeed him, I am ready (if you please to give me
leave) to contribute twenty pounds per annum towards a provision for him
till Mr Gregory’s place becomes void, if I live so long.’ The town council
respectfully declined this generous offer, and made suitable arrangements
otherwise for the young professor.
Colin Maclaurin amply justified the
recommendation of Sir Isaac by the distinction he attained as a teacher,
and his various original contributions to geometry and physics. A general
impulse was given by him to the cultivation of science. When any
remarkable experiment was reported from other countries, there was a
general wish in Edinburgh to see it repeated by Maclaurin; and when any
comet or eclipse was pending, his telescopes were sure to be in
requisition. Unfortunately, the career of this brilliant geometer was cut
short in consequence of a cold he caught while assisting to improve the
defences of Edinburgh against the army of Prince Charles Edward. He lies
under the south-west corner of the Greyfriars’ Church, where a plain mural
tablet arrests the attention of the student by telling that he was elected
to his chair, NEWTONO SUADENTE, and calls on all to take as a
consolation, in that field of grief and terror, the thought that the mind
which was capable of producing such works must survive the frail body.
Nov 20
The post from Edinburgh to London continued to be carried on horseback,
and was of course liable to casualties of what now appear to us of a
strange character. That which left Edinburgh on Saturday the 20th November
1725, was never heard of after it passed Berwick. ‘A most diligent search
has been made, but neither the boy, the horse, nor the packet, has yet
been heard of. The boy, after passing Goswick, having a part of the sands
to ride which divide the Holy Island from the mainland, it is supposed he
has missed his way, and rode towards the sea, where he and his horse have
both perished.’
A mail due at Edinburgh one day at the
close of January 1734, was apologised for by the postmaster as late. ‘It
seems the post-boy who rides the stage from Haddington to Edinburgh is
perished in the river Tyne, the mail this morning being taken out of that
river.’ That due on the 10th of October in the preceding year did not
reach its destination till the evening of the 11th. ‘It seems the post-boy
who made the stage between Dunbar and Haddington, being in liquor, fell
off. The horse was afterwards found at Linplum, but without the mail,
saddle, or bridle.’
On the 9th December 1735, we have the
following announcement: ‘The London post did not come on till this day at
noon, on occasion of the badness of the roads.’—cal. Merc.
As a variety upon these kinds of accident,
and equally indicating the simplicity of the institution in those days,
may be noticed a mistake of February 1720, when, ‘instead of the mail
should have come in yesterday (Sunday), we had our own mail of Thursday
last returned ‘—the presumption being that the mail for Edinburgh had
been in like manner sent back from some unknown point in the road, to
London. And this mistake happened once more in December 1728, the bag
des-patched on a Saturday night being returned the second Sunday
morning after; ‘tis reckoned this mistake happened about halfway on
the road.’
The immediate practical business of the
Post-office of Edinburgh appears to have been conducted, down to the reign
of George I., in a shop in the High Street, by a succession of persons
named Meau or Mein, the descendants of the lady who threw her stool at the
bishop’s head in St Giles’s in 1637; thence it was promoted to a fiat
in the east side of the Parliament Close; thence, again, in the reign
of George III., to a detached house behind the north side of the Cowgate.
We find that, in 1718, it had a ‘manager’ at two hundred a year, a clerk
at fifty, a comptroller, an assistant at an annual salary of twenty-five
pounds, and three letter-carriers at five shillings a week. In 1748, this
establishment was little changed, excepting that there were added an
‘apprehender of private letter-carriers,’ and a ‘clerk to the Irish
correspondents.’ There is a faithful tradition in the office, which I see
no reason to doubt, that one day, not long after the rebellion of 1745,
the London bag came to Edinburgh with but one letter in it, being one
addressed to the British Linen Company.
In 1758, a memorial of traders to the
Convention of Burghs expressed impatience with the existing arrangements
of the post between Edinburgh and London, which, owing to a delay of about
a day at Newcastle, and a pause at York, with other impediments, occupied
131 hours. It was urged that the three posts which passed weekly between
the two capitals should depart from Edinburgh at such a time as, reaching
Newcastle in 21 hours, they might be in time for immediate dispatch by the
post thence to London, and so give a return to correspondence with the
metropolis in seven or eight days, instead of about eleven, as at present.
It may be curious to trace the progress of
business in this important office, as far as the central Scottish
establishment is concerned. The number of persons employed in 1788 was 31;
in 1828, it was 82; in 1840, when the universal penny post was set on
foot, it reached 136; in 1860, it was 244. The number of letters delivered
in Edinburgh in a week in 1824 was 27,381; in 1860, it amounted to
156,000. The number of letters passing through Edinburgh per week in 1824
was 53,000; in 1860, it was 420,000. At the same time, the number of bags
despatched from Edinburgh daily was 369, weighing forty-nine
hundredweight. At the time when these notes were drawn up, the
establishment had become too large for a spacious and handsome building
erected in 1819, and another office of ampler proportions was about to be
erected.
Dec
Wodrow notes that at this time the merchants of Glasgow, in despair of the
colonial tobacco-trade, were beginning to think of ventures in other
directions, as the East Indies, and the Greenland whale-fishing.
Meanwhile, a Fishery Company, some time since set up at Edinburgh, was
languishing, the officials eating up more than the profit. ‘As far as I
can see,’ says the worthy minister of Eastwood, ‘till the Lord send more
righteousness and equity, and of a public spirit, no company or copartnery
among us will do any good.’
In the ensuing August, the same chronicler
notes some important points in the progress of Glasgow, without giving us
any hint of improvement in respect of righteousness. ‘This summer,’ says
he, ‘there seems to be a very great inclination through the country to
improve our manufactory, and especially linen and hemp. They speak of a
considerable society in Glasgow of the most topping merchants, who are
about to set up a manufactory of linen, which will keep six hundred poor
people at work. The gentlemen, by their influence, seem much to stir up
country-people, and to encourage good tradesmen, and some care is taken to
keep linen and webs exactly to standard, and to see that the stuff be good
and marketable….. What will come of it, I know not. I have seen frequent
attempts of this nature come to very little.’
It is gratifying to think that the year
1725, which is so sadly memorable in the history of Glasgow on account of
the ‘Shawfield Mob,’ really did become the epoch of that vast system of
textile manufacture for which the city has since been so celebrated. The
first efforts of her looms were confined to linen cloth, lawns, and
cambries. Seven years later, one of her enterprising citizens, a Mr
Alexander Harvie, ‘at the risk of his life, brought away from Haerlem two
inkle-looms and a workman,’ and was thus enabled to introduce the
manufacture of inkles into his native town, where it long flourished. The
establishment of the cotton-manufacture in and around Glasgow was the work
of a subsequent age, and need not be dwelt upon here.
Considering the engrossing nature of the
pursuits of commerce, it is remarkably creditable to Glasgow that her
university has always been maintained in a high state of efficiency, and
that she has never allowed the honours of literature to be wholly diverted
to her more serene sister of the east. So far had printing and publishing
advanced in Glasgow in the reign of the second George, that, in 1740, a
type-founding establishment was commenced there, being the first to the
north of the Tweed. The immediate credit of this good work is due to Mr
Alexander Wilson, a native of St Andrews. He subsequently became professor
of practical astronomy in the Glasgow University, and there, in 1769,
worked out the long-received theory of the solar spots, which suggests
their being breaches in a luminous envelope of the sun’s body.
Favoured by the presence of a
type-foundry, two citizens of Glasgow named Faulls, but who subsequently
printed their name as Foulis, commenced the business of typography in
1741, and soon became distinguished for their accurate and elegant work,
particularly in the printing of the classics. Eager to produce what might
be esteemed an immaculate edition of Horace, they caused the successive
proof-sheets, after revision, to be hung up at the gate of the university,
with the offer of a reward for the discovery of an error. Before 1747, the
Messrs Fordis had produced editions of eighteen classics, all of them
beautiful specimens of typography.
After all, the merchants of infant Glasgow
were able to overcome the difficulties which an iniquitous rivalry threw
in the way of their tobacco-trade. It went on gradually increasing till a
sudden stop was put to it by the revolt of the American colonies, when it
had reached an annual importation of about fifty thousand hogsheads, being
the great bulk of what was consumed in the three kingdoms. In the early
days of the trade, when capital was not abundant, the custom was for a
very small group of the more considerable merchants to advance two or
three hundred pounds each, and ask the lesser men around them to add such
shares as they pleased; by these means to make purchase of goods suited
for use in Virginia, which were sent out under the care of a supercargo,
to be exchanged for a lading of tobacco. ‘The first adventure . . . . was
sent under the sole charge of the captain of the vessel. This person,
though a shrewd man, knew nothing of accounts; and when he was asked by
his employers, on his return, for a statement of how the adventure had
turned out, told them he could give them none, but there were its
proceeds, and threw down upon the table a large hoggar (stocking)
stuffed to the top with coin (being of course the money surplus of the
goods sent out, after the cargo of tobacco was paid for). The company
conceived that if an uneducated person had been so successful, their
gains would have been still greater if a person versed in accounts had
been sent out. Under this impression, they immediately despatched a second
adventure with a supercargo highly recommended for a knowledge of
accounts, who produced to them a beautifully made-out statement of his
transactions, but no hoggar.’
Afterwards, the groups of adventurers
associated little more than their credit in the getting up of cargoes of
goods for the colonial market, and these were not in general paid till the
return of the tobacco, at the distance perhaps of a twelvemonth. When the
manager of the copartnery was ready to discharge its obligations, he
summoned the various furnishers of the goods to a tavern, where, over a
measure of wine to each, paid for by themselves, he handed them the amount
of their various claims, receiving a discharged account in return. In such
retreats all important matters of business were then transacted. They were
in many instances kept by the female relations of merchants who had not
been successful in business; and in selecting one whereto to summon the
furnishers of goods for payment, the manager would generally have an eye
to a benevolent design in favour of the family of an associate of former
days.
As the century rolled on, and transactions
increased in magnitude, luxury and pride crept in, men learned to garnish
their discourse with strange oaths, and the Wodrow pre-requisite of
‘righteousness’ was always less and less heard of. The wealth of the
Tobacco Lords, as the men pre-eminent in the trade were called,
reached an amount which made them the wonder of their country. One named
Glassford, during the Seven Years’ War, had twenty-five vessels engaged in
the business, and was said to trade for half a million. They
formed a kind of aristocracy in their native city, throwing all tolerably
successful industry in other walks into the shade. Old people, not long
deceased, used to describe them as seen every day on the Exchange, or a
piece of pavement in Argyle Street so called, wa’king about in long
scarlet cloaks and bushy wigs, objects of awful respect to their fellow
citizens, who, if desirous of speaking to one of them on business, found
it necessary to walk on the other side of the street, till they should be
fortunate enough to catch his eye, and be signalled across. All this came
to an end with the breaking out of the American war; when, however, the
irrepressible energies and wealth of that wonderful people of the west
speedily found new fields of operation—cotton, timber, iron, chemicals,
ship-building, and (in sober sincerity) what not?