1715, Oct 20
A newspaper which enjoyed a temporary existence in Edinburgh—each number
consisting of five small leaves—is vociferous with the celebrations of the
anniversary of King George’s coronation in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen,
Perth, and other Scottish towns. Ten days later, it proclaims with equal
vehemence the rejoicings in the same places in honour of the birthday of
the Prince of Wales. Paradings and firings of musketry by the troops,
drinkings of loyal toasts from covered tables at the Cross, bonfires,
ringings of bells, form the chief demonstrations. And it is notable that
in Dundee, Brechin, and Aberdeen, which we know to have been in those days
full of Jacobites, the symptoms of loyalty to Hanover are by many degrees
the most ostentatious, there being the more need of course for the friends
of the reigning house to exert themselves. In Dundee (where in reality the
Jacobites were probably two to one), ‘everybody looked cheerful, and vied
who should outdo other in rejoicing, except some few of our Jacobite
neighbours, who, being like owls, loved darkness; but care will be taken
that they spared not their money by being singular.’
Loyalty is altogether a paradox, appearances
with it being usually in the inverse ratio of its actual existence, and
the actuality in the inverse ratio of the deserving. No monarch ever
enjoyed so much of it as Charles I. Since the days of his sons, when the
bulk of the people of Scotland felt themselves under a civil and
ecclesiastical tyranny, the demonstrations at market-crosses on royal
birthdays had not been so violent as now, when a new family, about whom
nobody cared or could care, occupied the throne. Nor did these again
become equally loud till the time of George III., when Wilkes
prosecutions, losses of American colonies, and unjustifiable wars with
French reformers, made loyalty again a needful article, and
king’s-health-drinkings in the highest degree desirable. On the other
hand, when rulers are truly worthy of a faithful affection on the part of
their people—as in our happy age—one never hears the word loyalty
mentioned.
All through the reign of the first George and
a great part of that of his successor, the newspaper estimate of human
character seems to have had but one element—the attachment of the
individual to ‘our present happy establishment in church and state.’ At
the end of every paragraph announcing a choice of magistrates in Scotland,
it is pointedly stated that they are all friends of the Hanover
succession. Such things are, of course, simply the measure of the extent
of hatred and indifferency with which the happy establishment and dynasty
were regarded, as well as of the danger in which it was the fate of both
to exist, from the eagerness of many to get them destroyed.
The same newspaper, while
telling us of such grave things as Scottish nobles and gentlemen waiting
in the Tower and in Carlisle Castle for death or for life, as an incensed
government might please to dictate, gives us other notices, reminding us
of the affecting truism breathed from every sheet of the kind in our own
day, that all the affairs of human life, the serious, the comic, the
important, the trivial, are constantly going on shoulder to shoulder
together. We glance from a hard-wrung pardon for a dozen rebels, or an
account of the execution of Sergeant Ainslie, hung over the wall of
Edinburgh Castle for an attempt to render the fortress up to the
Jacobites—to the let of the lands of Biggarshiels, which ‘sow above eighty
boils of oats,’ and have a good ‘sheep-gang’ besides—or to David Sibbald’s
vessel, the Anne of Kirkcaldy, which now lies in Leith harbour for the
benefit of all who wish to transport themselves or their goods to London,
and is to sail with all expedition—or to the fact that yesterday the Duke
of Hamilton left Edinburgh for his country-seat, attended by a retinue of
gentlemen—or to an announcement of Allan Ramsay’s forthcoming poem of the
Morning Interview—for all these things come jostling along together in one
mouth. Nor may the following quaint advertisement be overlooked:
‘A young gentlewoman,
lately come from London, cuts hair extremely well, dresses in the newest
fashion, has the newest fashioned patterns for beads, ruffles, &c., and
mends lace very fine, and does all sort of plain work; also teaches young
gentlewomen to work, and young women for their work. She does all manner
of quilting and stitching. All the ladies that come to her on Monday and
Thursday, have their hair cut for sixpence; at any other time, as
reasonably as any in town; and dresses the beads on wires cheaper than any
one. She lodges in the Luckenbooths, over against the Tolbooth, at one Mr
Palmer’s, a periwig-maker, up one pair of stairs.’
Since the Revolution, there
had been a constant and eager pressure towards commerce and manufactures
as a means of saving the nation from the wretched poverty with which it
was afflicted. But as yet there had been scarcely the slightest movement
towards the improvement of another great branch of the national
economy—namely, the culture of the ground. The country was unenclosed;
cultivation was only in patches near houses; farm establishments were
clusters of hovels; the rural people, among whom the distinction of master
and servant was little marked, lived in the most wretched manner. A large
part of rent was paid in produce and by services. Old systems of husbandry
reigned without disturbance. Little had yet been done to facilitate
communications in the country by roads, as indeed little was required, for
all goods were carried on horseback.
The first notable attempt
at planting was by Thomas, sixth Earl of Haddington, about the time of the
Union. From a love of common country sports, this young nobleman was
called away by his wife, a sister of the first Earl of Hopetoun, who
desired to see him engaged in planting, for which she had somehow acquired
a taste. The domain they had to work upon was a tract of low ground
surrounding their mansion of Tyninghame, composing part of the coast of
the Firth of Forth between North Berwick and Dunbar. Their first
experiment was upon a tract of about three hundred acres, where it was
believed that no trees could grow on account of the sea-air. To the marvel
of all, Lord Haddington included, the Binning Wood, as it was called, soon
became a beautiful sylvan domain, as it continues to this day. To pursue
his lordship’s own recital: ‘I now took pleasure in planting and
improving; but, because I did not like the husbandry practised in this
country, I got some farmers from Dorsetshire. This made me divide my
ground; but, as I knew the coldness of the climate, and the bad effects
the winds had, I made stripes of planting between every enclosure, some
forty, fifty, or sixty feet broad, as I thought best….. From these
Englishmen we came to the knowledge of sowing and the management of
grass-seeds. After making the enclosures, a piece of ground that carried
nothing but furze was planted; and my wife, seeing the unexpected success
of her former projects, went on to another….. There was a warren of
four hundred acres, vastly sandy (near the mouth of the Tyne). A gentleman
who had lived some time at Hamburg, one day walking with her, said that he
had seen fine trees growing upon such a soil. She took the hint, and
planted about sixty or seventy acres of warren. All who saw it at the time
thought that labour and trees were thrown away; but to their amazement,
they saw them prosper as well as in the best grounds. The whole field was
dead sand, with scarce any grass on it; nor was it only so poor on the
surface, but continued so some yards down. Such was the origin of the
famous Tyninghame Woods, which now present eight hundred acres of the
finest timber in the country. By means of his Dorsetshire farmers,
too, Lord Haddington became the introducer of the practice of sowing
clover and other grass-seeds.
Another early improver of the surface was Sir
Archibald Grant of Monymusk (second baronet of the title), whose merits,
moreover, are the more remarkable, as his operations took place in a
remote part of the north. ‘in my early days,’ says be, ‘soon after the
Union, husbandry and manufactures were in low esteem. Turnips (raised) in
fields for cattle by the Earl of Rothes and very few others, were wondered
at. Wheat was almost confined to East Lothian. Enclosures were few, and
planting very little; no repair of roads, all bad, and very few
wheel-carriages. in 1720, I could not, in chariot, get my wife from
Aberdeen to Monymusk. Colonel Middleton (was) the first who used carts or
wagons there; and he and I (were) the first benorth Tay who had hay,
except very little at Gordon Castle. Mr Lockhart of Carnwath, author of
Memoirs, (was) the first that attempted raising or feeding cattle to
size.’
‘By the indulgence of a very worthy father,’
says Sir Archibald, ‘I was allowed (in) 1716, though then very young, to
begin to enclose and plant, and provide and prepare nurseries. At that
time there was not one acre upon the whole estate enclosed, nor any timber
upon it but a few elm, sycamore, and ash, about a small kitchen-garden
adjoining to the house (a very common arrangement about old Scotch country
mansion-houses), and some straggling trees at some of the farmyards, with
a small copsewood, not enclosed and dwarfish, and browsed by sheep and
cattle. All the farms (were) ill-disposed and mixed, different persons
having alternate ridges; not one wheel-carriage on the estate, nor indeed
any one road that would allow it; and the rent about £600 sterling per
annum, (when) grain and services (were) converted into money. The house
was an old castle, with battlements and six different roofs of various
heights and directions, confusedly and inconveniently combined, and all
rotten, with two wings more modern of two stories only, the half of the
windows of the higher rising above the roofs; with granaries, stables, and
houses for all cattle and the vermin attending them close adjoining; and
with the heath and muir reaching in angles or gushets to the gate, and
much heath near. What land was in culture belonged to the farms, by which
their cattle and dung were always at the door. The whole land (was) raised
and uneven, and full of stones, many of them very large, of a hard iron
quality, and all the ridges crooked in shape of an S, and very high, and
full of noxious weeds, and poor, being worn out by culture, without proper
manure or tillage. Much of the land and muir near the house (was) poor and
boggy; the rivulet that runs before the house in pits and shallow streams,
often varying channel, with banks always ragged and broken. The people
(were) poor, ignorant, and slothful, and ingrained enemies to planting,
enclosing, or any improvements or cleanness; no keeping of sheep or
cattle, or roads, but four months, when oats and bear (which was the only
sorts of their grain) was on ground. The farmhouses, and even corn-mills,
and manse and school, (were) all poor, dirty huts, (occasionally) pulled
in pieces for manure, or (which) fell of themselves almost each alternate
year.’
By Sir Archibald’s exertions, Monymusk became
in due time a beautiful domain, well cultivated and productive, checkered
with fine woods, in which are now some of the largest trees to be seen in
that part of Scotland.
There is reason to believe that the very first
person who was effective in introducing any agricultural improvements into
Scotland was an English lady. It was in 1706—the year before the
Union—that Elizabeth Mordaunt, daughter of the famous Earl of
Peterborough, married the eldest son of the Duke of Gordon, and came to
reside in Scotland. A spark of her father’s enterprising genius made her
desire to see her adopted country put on a better aspect, and she took
some trouble to effect the object, by bringing down to some of her
father-in-law’s estates English ploughs, with men to work them, and who
were acquainted with the business off allowing herethfore utterly unknown
in Scotland.
Her ladyship instructed the people of her
neighbourhood in the proper way of making hay, of which they were
previously ignorant; and set an example in the planting of muirs and the
laying out of gardens. Urged by her counsels, during the first twenty
years of her residence in Scotland, two Morayland proprietors, Sir Robert
Gordon of Gordonston, and a gentleman named Dunbar, and one Ross-shire
laird, Sir William Gordon of Invergordon, set about the draining and
planting of their estates, and the introduction of improved modes of
culture, including the sowing of French grasses.’ It is rather remarkable
that Scotland should have received her first impulse towards agricultural
improvements from England, which we have in recent times seen, as it were,
sitting at her feet as a pupil in all the various particulars of a
superior rural economy.
1716, Nov
We are informed that, after the close of the Rebellion, owing to the
number of people cast loose thereby from all the ordinary social bonds,
‘thefts, robberies, rapines, and depredations became so common (in the
Highlands and their borders), that they began to be looked upon as neither
shameful nor dishonourable, and people of a station somewhat above the
vulgar, did sometimes countenance, encourage, nay, head gangs of banditti
in those detestable villanies.’ The tenants of great landlords who had
joined the Whig cause were particularly liable to despoliation, and to
this extent the system bore the character of a kind of guerilla warfare.
Such a landlord was the Duke of Montrose, whose lands lying chiefly in the
western parts of Perth, Stirling, and Dumbarton shires, were peculiarly
exposed to this kind of rapine. His Grace, moreover, had so acted towards
Rob Roy, as to create in that personage a deep sense of injury, which the
Highland moral code called for being wreaked out in every available
method. Rob had now constituted himself the head of the broken men of his
district, and having great sagacity and address, he was by no means a
despicable enemy.
At the date noted, the duke’s factor, Mr
Graham of Killearn, came in the usual routine, to collect his Grace’s
Martinmas rents at a place called Chapel-eroch, about half-way between
Buchanan House and the village of Drymen. The farmers were gathered
together, and had paid in about two hundred and sixty pounds, when Rob
Roy, with twenty followers, descended upon the spot from the hills of
Buchanan. Having planted his people about the house, he coolly entered,
took Mr Graham prisoner, and possessed himself of the money that had been
collected, as well as the account-books, telling the factor that he would
answer for all to the duke, as soon as his Grace should pay him three
thousand four hundred merks, being the amount of what he professed himself
to have been wronged of by the havoc committed by the duke upon his house
at Craigrostan, and subsequently by the burning of his house at
Auchinchisallen by the government troops. Mr Graham was permitted to write
to the duke, stating the case, and telling that he was to remain a
prisoner till his Grace should comply with Rob’s demands, with ‘hard usage
if any party are sent after him.’
Mr Graham was marched about by Rob Roy from
place to place, ‘under a very uneasy kind of restraint,’ for a week, when
at length the outlaw, considering that he could not mend matters, but
might only provoke more hostility by keeping his prisoner any longer,
liberated him with his books and papers, but without the money.
Part of the duke’s rents being paid in kind,
there were ,girnels or grain stores near Chapel-croch, into which the
farmers of the district used to render their quotas of victual, according
to custom. ‘Whenever Rob and his followers were pressed with want, a party
was detached to execute an order of their commnanders, for taking as much
victual out of these girnels as was necessary for them at the time.’ In
this district, ‘the value of the thefts and depredations committed upon
some lands were equal to the yearly rent of the lands, and the persons of
small heritors were taken, carried off, and detained prisoners till they
redeemed themselves for a sum of money, especially if they had at
elections for parliament voted for the government man.”
The duke got his farmers armed, and was
preparing for an inroad on the freebooter’s quarters, when, in an
unguarded moment, they were beset by a party of Macgregors under Rob’s
nephew, Gregor Macgregor of Glengyle, and turned adrift without any of
their military accoutrements. The duke renewed the effort with better
success, for, marching into Balquhidder with some of his people, he took
Rob Roy prisoner. But here good-fortune and native craft befriended the
outlaw. Being carried along on horseback, bound by a belt to the man who
had him in charge, he contrived so to work on the man’s feelings as to
induce him to slip the bond, as they were crossing a river, when, diving
under the stream, he easily made his escape. Sir Walter Scott heard this
story recited by the grandson of Rob’s friend, and worked it up with his
usual skill in the novel bearing the outlaw’s name.
While these operations were going on, the
commissioners on the Forfeited Estates were coolly reckoning up the little
patrimony of Rob Roy as part of the public spoil of the late rebellion. It
is felt as a strange and uncouth association that Steele, of Tatler and
Spectator memory—kind-hearted, thoughtless Dicky Steele —should have been
one of the persons who administered in the affairs of the cateran of
Craigrostan. In the final report of the Commissioners, we have the pitiful
account of the public gains from the ruin of poor Rob, Inversnaid being
described as of the yearly value of £53, 16s. 8d., and the total realised
from it of purchase-money and interest, £958, 10s. There is all possible
reason to believe, that it would have been a much more advantageous as
well as humane arrangement for the public, to allow these twelve miles of
Highland mountains to remain in the hands of their former owner.
1717, Jan
Wonder-seekers were at this time regaled with a brochure stating how Mr
John Gardner, minister near Elgin, fell into a trance, and lay as dead for
two days, in the sight of many; and how, being put into a coffin, and
carried to his parish church in order to be buried, he was heard at the
last moment to make a noise in the coffin; which being opened, he was
found alive, to the astonishment of all present.’ Being then carried home,
and put into a warm bed, he in a little time coming to himself, ‘related
many strange things which he had seen in the other world.’ In the same
publication was a sermon which the worthy man had preached after his
recovery.
Apr 28
Mr Gordon of Ellon, a rich merchant of Edinburgh, lived in a villa to the
north of the city, with a family composed of a wife, two sons, and a
daughter, the children being all of tender age.’ He had for a tutor to his
two boys a licentiate of the church, named Robert Irvine, who was
considered of respectable attainments, but remarked for a somewhat
melancholic disposition. A gloomy view of predestination, derived from a
work by Flavel, had taken hold of Irvine’s mind, which, perhaps, had some
native infirmity, ready to be acted upon by external circumstances to
dismal results.
The tutor, having cast eyes of affection upon
a servant-girl in his employer’s house, was tempted, one day, to take some
liberties with her, which were observed and reported by his two pupils. He
was reprimanded by Mr Gordon for this breach of decorum, which, on an
apology from him, was forgiven. The incident sunk into the man’s sensitive
nature, and he brooded upon it till it assumed proportions beyond the
reality, and raised in his heart an insane thirst for revenge. For three
days did the wretch revolve the idea of cutting off Mr Gordon’s three
children, and on the day here noted he found an opportunity of partially
accomplishing his morbid desire. It was Sunday, and Mr and Mrs Gordon went
to spend the latter part of the day with a friend in the city, taking
their little daughter along with them. Irvine, left with the two boys,
took them out for a walk along the then broomy slope where St Andrew
Square and York Place are now situated. The children ran about gathering
flowers and pursuing butterflies, while this fiend-transformed man sat
whetting a knife wherewith to cut short their days. Calling the two boys
to him, he upbraided them with their informing upon him, and told them
that they must suffer for it. They ran off but he easily overtook and
seized them. Then keeping one down upon the grass with his knee, he cut
the other’s throat; after which he despatched in like manner the remaining
one.
The insane nature of the action was shewn by
its being committed in daylight in an open place, exposed to the view of
multitudes who might chance to look that way from the adjacent city. A
gentleman, enjoying his evening walk upon the Castle Hill, did obtain a
tolerably perfect view of the incident, and immediately gave an alarm.
Irvine, who had already attempted to cut his own throat, but
unsuccessfully, ran from his pursuers to the Water of Leith, thinking to
drown himself there; but he was taken, and brought in a cart to prison,
and there chained down to the floor, as if he had been a wild beast.
There was a summary process of law for
murderers taken as he was with the red hand. It was only necessary to
bring him next day before the judge of the district, and have sentence
passed upon him. In this case, the judge was the Baron Bailie of
Broughton, a hamlet now overwhelmed in the spreading streets of the New
Town of Edinburgh, but whose court-house existed so lately as 1827. Till
the abolition of heritable jurisdictions in 1747, the bailie of the Baron
of Broughton could arraign a criminal before a jury of his own people, and
do the highest judgment upon him. Irvine was tricd by the bailie upon the
30th of April, and received sentence of death. During the brief interval
before execution, which was but a day, the unhappy wretch was addressed by
several clergymen on the heinousness of his crime, and the need of
repentance, and, after a time, he began to exhibit signs of contrition.
The bloody clothes of the poor children being then exhibited before him,
he broke out in tears and groans, as if a new light was shed upon his
mind, and he had been able to see his offence in its true character. He
then sent a message to the bereaved parents, beseeching their Christian
forgiveness to a dying man; and this they very kindly gave.
Irvine was next day hanged at Greenside,
having first had his hands hacked off, and stuck upon the gibbet by the
knife with which he had committed the murder. His body was thrown into a
neighbouring quarry-hole.
June 10
Occurred this day at Edinburgh a thunder-storm, attended with such
remarkable effects, that an account of it was published on a broadside. It
was little, perhaps, that it frightened the people off the streets, caused
the garrison at the Castle to look well to the powder-magazine, and killed
a man and a woman at Lasswade. What attracted particular attention was the
fate of a tavern company at Canonmills, where two barbers from the
Lawn-market had come to celebrate the Pretender’s birthday over a bottle
of ale. They had just drunk to the health of their assumed monarch—one of
the company had remarked with a curse how the bells were not rung or the
Castle guns fired on ‘the king’s’ birthday—when a great thunder-clap broke
over the house. ‘The people on earth,’ cried one of the party, ‘will not
adore their king; but you hear the Almighty is complimenting him with a
volley from heaven.’ At that moment came a second stroke, which
instantaneously killed one of the barbers and a woman, and scorched a
gentleman so severely that he died in a few hours. The rest of the
company, being amazed, sent to Edinburgh for doctors to take blood of the
gentleman; but the doctors told them they could do no good. They tried to
let blood of him, but found none. Their bodies were as soft as wool.’
‘There is none more blind than them that will
not see: these men may see, if they wilfully will not shut their eyes,
that Providence many times bath blasted their enterprises….. These men
were contending for that which did not concern them; they were drinking,
cursing, and passing reflections— which in all probability hath offended
the King of Heaven to throw down his thunder, &c., a warning to all
blasphemers, drunkards, swearers, licentious livers, and others.’ It is a
little awkward for this theory, that among the killed was but one of the
Jacobite barbers, the other and equally guilty one escaping.
June
The capture of the fugitate Rob Roy seeming now an object worthy of the
regard of the Duke of Athole, a negotiation took place between them, which
ended in Rob being taken into custody of a strong party at Logierait, the
place where his Grace usually exercised his justiciary functions, and
where his prison accordingly was situated. The outlaw felt he had been
deceived, but it did not appear that he could help himself. Meanwhile, the
duke sent intelligence of the capture of Rob to Edinburgh, desiring a
company of troops to be sent to receive him. Ultimately, however, the
duke countermanded the military, finding he could send a sufficiently
strong party of his own people to hand over the outlaw to justice.
While preparations were making for his
transmission to the Lowlands, Rob entertained his guards with whisky, and
easily gained their confidence. One day, when they were all very hearty,
he made a business to go to the door to deliver a letter for his wife to a
man who was waiting for it, and to whom he pretended he had some private
instructions to give. One of the guard languidly accompanied him, as it
were for form’s sake, having no fear of his breaking off. Macgregor was
thus allowed to lounge about outside for a few minutes, till at last
getting near his horse, he suddenly mounted, and was off to Stirlingshire
like the wind.
To have set two dukes upon thief-catching
within a twelvemonth or so, and escaped out of the clutches of both, was
certainly a curious fate for a Highiand cateran, partisan warrior, or
whatever name he may be called by.
Nov
Sir Richard Steele appears not to have attended the business of the
Forfeited Estates Commission in Edinburgh during the year 1716, but given
his time, as usual, to literary and political pursuits in London, and to
a project in which he had become concerned for bringing fish ‘alive and in
good health’ to the metropolis. It was reported that he would get no pay
for the first year, as having performed no duty; but those who raised this
rumour must have had a very wrong notion of the way that Public affairs
were then administered. He tells his wife, May 22, 1717, in one of those
most amorous of marital letters of his which Leigh Hunt has praised so
much, that ‘five hundred pounds for the time the commission was in
Scotland is already ordered me.’ It is strange to reflect that payment of
coach-horses, which he, as a man of study, rarely used, and condemned as
vain superfluities, was among the things on which was spent the property
wrung out of the vitals of the poor Scotch Jacobites.
When the second year’s session of the
commissioners was about to commence in September 1717, Sir Harry Houghton
appears to have proposed that Steele should go at the first, in which case
the baronet proposed to relieve him in November; in case he did not go
now, he would have to go in November, and stay till the end of January. He
dallied on in London, only scheming about his journey, which, it must be
admitted, was not an easy one in 1717. He informs his wife: ‘I alter the
manner of taking my journey every time I think of it. My present
disposition is to borrow what they call a post-chaise of the Duke of
Roxburgh (Secretary of State for Scotland). It is drawn by one horse, runs
on two wheels, and is led by a servant riding by. This rider and leader is
to be Mr Willmot, formerly a carrier, who answers for managing on a road
to perfection, by keeping tracks, and the like.’ Next it was: ‘I may
possibly join with two or three gentlemen, and hire a coach for
ourselves.’ On the 30th of September, he tells Lady Steele: ‘The
commission in Scotland stands still for want of me at Edinburgh. It is
necessary there should be four there, and there are now but two; three
others halt on the road, and will not go forward till I have passed by
York. I have therefore taken places in the York coach for Monday next.’ On
the 20th of October: ‘After many resolutions and irresolutions concerning
my way of going, I go, God willing, to-morrow morning, by the Wakefield
coach, on my way to York and Edinburgh.’ And now he did go, for his next
letter is dated on the 23d from Stamford, to which place two days’
coaching had brought him.
An odd but very characteristic circumstance
connected with Steele’s first journey to Scotland was, that he took a
French master with him, in order that the long idle days and evenings of
travelling might be turned to some account in his acquisition of that
language, which he believed would be useful to him on his return. ‘He lies
in the same room with me; and the loquacity which is usual at his age, and
inseparable from his nation, at once contributes to my purpose, and makes
him very agreeable.’
Steele was in Edinburgh on the 5th of
November, and we know that about the 9th he set out on his return to
London, because on the 11th he writes to his wife from Ayton on the third
day of his journey, one (a Sunday) having been spent in inaction on the
road. ‘I hope,’ says he, ‘God willing, to be at London, Saturday come
se’ennight:’ that is to say, the journey was to take a fortnight. In
accordance with this view of the matter, we find him writing on Friday the
15th from Pearce Bridge, in the county of Durham, ‘with my limbs much
better than usual after my seven days’ journey from Edinburgh towards
London.’ He tells on this occasion: ‘You cannot imagine the civilities and
honours I had done me there, and (I) never lay better, ate or drank
better, or conversed with men of better sense, than there.’
Brief as his visit had been, he was evidently
pleased with the men he met with in the Scottish capital. All besides
officials must have felt that he came about a business of malign aspect
towards their country; but his name was an illustrious one in British
literature, he was personally good-natured, and they could separate the
great essayist from the Whig partisan and servant of the ministry. Allan
Ramsay would be delighted to see him in his shop ‘opposite to Niddry’s
Wynd head.’ Thomson, then a youth at college, would steal a respectful
look at him as he stood amongst his friends at the Cross. From ‘Alexander
Pennecuik, gentleman,’ a bard little known to fame, he received a set of
complimentary verses, ending thus:
‘Scotia…..
Grief more than age hath furrowed her brow,
She sobs her sorrows, yet she smiles on you;
Tears from her crystal lambies do distil,
With throbbing breast she dreads th’ approaching ill,
Yet still she loves you, though you come to kill,
In midst of fears and wounds, which she doth feel,
Kisses the hurting hand, smiles on the wounding STEELE.’
1718
Sir Richard spent part of the summer of 1718 in Edinburgh, in attendance
upon the business of the commission. We find him taking a furnished house
for the half-year beginning on the 15th of May (the Whitsunday term in
Scotland), from Mr James Anderson, the editor of the Diplomata Scotiae.
But on the 29th July he had not come to take possession: neither could he
say when he would arrive, till his ‘great affair’ was finished. He
promised immediately thereupon to take his horses for Scotland, ‘though I
do not bring my coach, by reason of my wife’s inability to go with me.’ ‘I
shall,’ he adds, ‘want the four-horse stable for my saddle-horses.’
He appears to have taken the same house for
the same period in 1719, and to have revisited Scotland in the same manner
in 1720, when he occupied the house of Mr William Scott, professor of
Greek in the Edinburgh University.’ There is a letter to him from Mr James
Anderson in February 1721, thanking him for the interest he had taken in
forwarding a scheme of the writer, to induce the government to purchase
his collection of historical books. Steele was again residing in Edinburgh
in October 1721, when we find him in friendly intercourse with Mr
Anderson. ‘Just before I received yours,’ he says on one occasion, ‘I sent
a written message to Mr Montgomery, advising that I designed the coach
(Steele’s own carriage?) should go to your house, to take in your galaxy,
and afterwards call for his star:’ pleasant allusions these probably to
some party of pleasure in which the female members of Mr Anderson’s and Mr
Montgomery’s families were to be concerned. In the ensuing month, he
writes to Mr Anderson from the York Buildings Office in London, regarding
an application he had had from a poor woman named Margaret Gow. He could
not help her with her petition; but he sent a small bill representing
money of his own for her relief ‘This trifle,’ he says, ‘in her
housewifely hands, will make cheerful her numerous family at Collingtown.’
These are meagre particulars regarding
Steele’s visits to Scotland, but at least serviceable in illustrating his
noted kindheartedness.
‘Kind Richy Spec, the friend of a’
distressed,’
as he is called by Allan Ramsay, who doubtless
made his personal acquaintance at this time.
There is a traditionary anecdote of Steele’s
visits to Scotland, which has enough of truth-likeness to be entitled to
preservation. It is stated that, in one of his journeys northward, soon
after he had crossed the Border, near Annan, he observed a shepherd
resting on a hillside and reading a book. He and his companions rode up,
and one of them asked the man what he was reading. It proved to be the
Bible. ‘And what do you learn from this book?’ asked Sir Richard. ‘I learn
from it the way to heaven.’ ‘Very well,’ replied the knight, ‘we are
desirous of going to the same place, and wish you would shew us the way.’
Then the shepherd, turning about, pointed to a tall and conspicuous object
on an eminence at some miles’ distance, and said: ‘Weel, gentlemen, ye
maun just gang by that tower.’ The party, surprised and amused, demanded
to know how the tower was called. The shepherd answered: ‘It is the Tower
of Repentance.
It was so in verity. Some centuries ago, a
Border cavalier, in a fit of remorse, had built a tower, to which he gave
the name of Repentance. It lies near Hoddam House, in the parish of
Cummertrees, rendered by its eminent situation a conspicuous object to all
the country round.
We are informed by Richard
Shiels that Steele, while in Scotland, had interviews with a considerable
number of the Presbyterian clergy, with the view of inducing them to
agree to a union of the Presbyterian and Episcopal churches—a ‘devout
imagination,’ which one would have thought a very few such interviews
would have been required to dispel. He was particularly struck with the
singular and original character of James Hart, one of the ministers of
Edinburgh, who is universally admitted to have been an excellent man, as
he was a most attractive preacher. That strange enthusiast, Mrs Elizabeth
West, speaks of a discourse she once heard from him on a passage in
Cantieles: ‘The king hath brought me into his chambers; we will be glad,’
where he held forth, she says, ‘on the sweet fellowship Christ and
believers have together.’ ‘Oh,’ she adds, ‘but this was a soul-refreshing
sermon to me!’ What had most impressed the English moralist was the
contrast between the good-humour and benevolence of Hart in his private
character, and the severe style in which he launched forth in the pulpit
on the subject of human nature, and on the frightful punishments awaiting
the great mass of mankind iu another state of existence. Steele called him
on this account ‘the Hangman of the Gospel.’
The only
other recollection of Steele in Edinburgh which has ever come under the
notice of the author, represents him, characteristically, as assembling
all the eccentric-looking mendicants of the Scottish capital in a tavern
in Lady Stair’s Close, and there pleasing the whimsical taste of himself
and one or two friends by witnessing their happiness in the enjoyment of
an abundant feast, and observing all their various humours and oddities.
Shiels also relates this circumstance, and adds that Steele afterwards
confessed he had drunk in enough of native drollery to compose a comedy.
1717, Nov
Lord Grange tells us, in his Diary, of a woman in humble life, residing in
the Potterrow in Edinburgh, who had religious experiences reminding us of
those of St Theresa and Antonia Bourignon, but consonant with orthodox
Presbyterianism. Being taken, along with Mr Logan, the minister of
Culross, to see her at ‘Lady Aytoun’s, at the back of the College,’ he
found her a woman between thirty and forty. At the communion in Leith, a
month ago, she had striven to dwell upon the thought of Christ, and came
to have ‘clear uptakings of his sufferings.’ She saw him on the cross, and
his deserted sepulchre, ‘as plainly as if she had been actually present
when these things happened, though there was not any visible
representation thereof made to her bodily eyes. She also got liberty to
speak to him, and ask several questions at him, to which she got answers,
as if one had spoken to her audibly, though there was no audible voice.’
Lord Grange admits that all this was apt to look like enthusiasm or
delusion; but ‘far be it from me to say it is delusion.’ Being once at a
communion in Kirkcaldy, ‘it was born in upon her— Arise and eat, for thou
hast a journey to make, a Jordan to pass through.’ In passing across the
Firth of Forth that afternoon, she was upset into the water, but sustained
till a boat came to her rescue.
The pious judge seems to
have desired much to keep up acquaintance with Jean Brown—for such was her
name—and he went several times to see her at her little shop; but the
place was so iunch crowded with children and people coining in to buy snch
things as she sells,’ that his wish was frustrated. ‘Afterwards,’ lie
tells us, ‘I employed her husband (a shoemaker) to make some little things
for me, mostly to give them business, and that I might thereby get
opportnnity now and then to talk with such as, I hope, are acquainted with
the ways of God.’
1718
Immediately after the Union, the shrewd-witted people of Glasgow saw the
opportunity which was afforded them of making a profitable trade with the
American colonies. They had as yet no vessels of their own, and little
means of purchasing cargoes; but diligence, frugality, and patience made
up for all deficiencies. There is scarcely anything in our national
history more truly interesting than the early efforts of Glasgow in
commerce. Her first ventures to Maryland and Virginia were in vessels
chartered from Whitehaven. In each vessel, filled with goods, there went a
supercargo, whose simple instructions were to sell as many as he could for
tobacco, and return home as soon as he had sold all, or had got enough of
the plant to fill his vessel, whether the goods were all sold or not,
bringing home with him any that remained unsold. In this cautions way were
the foundations of the wondrous wealth of Glasgow laid. It was not till
now, eleven years after the Union, that the first vessel belonging to
Glasgow crossed the Atlantic.
By that time, much of the
tobacco-trade had come into the hands of Glasgow merchants. Bristol,
Liverpool, and White-haven, which had heretofore been the great entrepóts
of the trade, opened their eyes with some little surprise when they began
to find Glasgow underselling them in this article even among their own
retailers, it was the mere frugality of the Scottish traders which gave
them this advantage. But the jealousy of their rivals refused to see the
true cause. They entered in 1721 into a confederacy to destroy the
tobacco-trade of Glasgow, petitioning in succession the House of Lords and
the House of Commons, with utterly unfounded complaints on the subject.
The charges of fraud were declared groundless by the upper house; but, in
the lower, the just defences of Glasgow were disregarded, through the
interest made by her adversaries. ‘New officers were appointed at the
ports of Greenock and Port-Glasgow, whose private instructions seem to
have been to ruin the trade, if possible, by putting all imaginable
hardships upon it; bills of equity were exhibited against the merchants in
the Court of Exchequer for no less than thirty-three ships’
cargoes, by which they were commanded to declare, on oath, whether or not
they had imported in these ships any, and how much, more tobacco than what
had been exported, or had paid the king’s duty. Vexatious lawsuits of
every kind were stirred up against them. Every specics of persecution,
which malice, assisted by wealth and interest, could invent, to destroy
the trade of Glasgow, was put in practice,’ and in part successfully, the
trade being reduced to a languishing condition, in which it remained for a
number of years.’
Quiet Mr Wodrow, in his neighbouring
Renfrewshire parish, seems to have rather relished any loss or difficulty
sustained by this industrious community, being apparently under an
impression that wealth was apt to abate the godly habits of the people.
He already recognised a party in the city who mocked at the ministry, and
everything that was serious. Instead of seventy-two meetings for prayer,
which he had known some years before, there were now but four or five;
while in their place flourished club-meetings, at which foolish questions
were discussed. He adverts to the blow struck at the tobacco-trade
through the House of Commons, ‘which they say will be twenty thousand
pounds loss to that place. I wish it may be sanctified to them.’
We have seen a concert taking place in
Edinburgh in 1694, and a very grand one, partly supported by amateurs,
presented in celebration of St Cecilia’s Day, in the ensuing year. We
learn that there was now a weekly meeting of amateurs at the Cross Keys
Tavern, kept by one Steil, who is noted as an excellent singer of Scottish
songs, and who appears to have possessed a collection of instruments for
the use of his guests. This meeting admitted of visitors of both sexes,
and was a point of reunion for the beau monde of Edinburgh in days while
as yet there were neither balls nor theatres. Its being held in a tavern
would be no objection to the ladies. Allan Ramsay, in singing the winter
attractions of the city, does not forget that
‘Others can with music make you gay,
With sweetest sounds Corelli’s art display;’
And then adds a picture of the scene
To visit, and take tea the well—dressed fair
May pass the crowd unruffled in her chair
No dust or mire her shining foot shall stain,
Or on the horizontal hoop give pain.
For beaux and bclles no city can compare,
Nor shew a galaxy so made, so fair;
The ears are charmed, and ravished are the eyes,
When at the concert my fair stars arise;
What poets of fictitious beauties sing,
Shall in bright order fill the dazzling ring;
From Venus, Pallas, and the spouse of Jove,
They ‘d gain the prize, judged by the god of Love.’
A writer of some ability and acuteness, who
travelled over Scotland, and wrote an account of his journey, published in
1723, tells us that he was at several consorts in Edinburgh, and had much
reason to be pleased with the appearance of the ladies. He had never in
any country seen ‘an assembly of greater beauties.’ It is not in point
here, but it may be stated that he also admired their stately firm way of
walking ‘with the joints extended and the toes out,’ and thought their
tartan head—mantles of scarlet and green at church as gay as a parterre of
flowers. At the same time, he knew them to be good housewives, and that
many gentlemen of good estate were not ashamed to wear clothes of their
wives’ and servants’ spinning.
To return to music—it looks like a mark of
rising taste for sweet sounds, that we have a paragraph in the Edinburgh
Courant for July 12, 1720, announcing that Mr Gordon, who had lately been
travelling in Italy for his improvement in music, was daily expected in
Edinburgh, ‘accompanied with Signor Lorenzo Bocchi, who is considered the
second master of the violoncello in Europe, and the fittest hand to join
Mr Gordon’s voice in the consorts which he designs to entertain his
friends with before the rising of the session.’ On the 28th of May 1722,
at the request of several gentlemen of Glasgow, Mr Gordon was to give a
‘consort’ in that city ; and immediately after we hear of him publishing
proposals for the improvement of music in Scotland, together with a most
reasonable and easy scheme for establishing a Pastoral Opera in
Edinburgh.’ Signor Bocchi seems to have been able to carve a professional
position for himself in Edinburgh, for in 1726 we find him publishing
there an opera of his own composition, containing twelve sonatas for
different instruments—violin, flute, violoncello, &c., with a libretto in
broad Scotch by Allan Ramsay, beginning:
‘Blate Johnnie faintly tauld fair Jean his
mind.’
It was about this time that the native music
of Scotland—those beautiful melodies which seem to have sprung up in the
country as naturally and unperceivedly as the primroses and the
gowans—were first much heard of to the south of the Tweed. William
Thomson, who was a boy at the Feast of St Cecilia in 1695, had since grown
up in the possession of a remarkably sweet voice for the singing of Scots
songs, and having migrated to London, he was there so well received, that
Scottish music became fashionable even amidst the rage there was at the
same time for the opera and the compositions of Handel. A collection of
Scottish songs, with the music, under the title of Orpheus Caledonius, was
published by Thomson in London in 1725, with a dedication to the Princess
of Wales, and republished in an extended form in 1733.
Of the other performers at the Feast of St
Cecilia, a few were still flourishing. Adam Craig, a teacher of music,
played second violin at the gentlemen’s concerts with high approbation.
Matthew M’Gibbon was no more; but he had left a superior representative in
his son William, who had studied under Corbet in London, and was now
leader and first-violin at the concerts, playing the music of Corelli,
Geminiani, and Handel with great skill and judgment. A collection of Scots
tunes by William M’Gibbon, published in 1742 and subsequent years, was
long in high repute.’ Of the St Cecilia amateurs we only hear now of Lord
Colville, who seems to have been a great enthusiast, ‘a thorough master of
music,’ and is said to have ‘understood counterpoiut well.’ His
instruments were the harpsichord and organ. He had made a large collection
of music, much of it brought home to him from Italy.
‘The god of Music joins when Colvil plays,
And all the Muses dance to Haddington’s essays;
The charms are mutual, piercing, and compleat—
This in his art excels, and that in wit.’
Defoe’s Caledonia, 1706.
Robert Lord Colville of Ochiltree (for it is
necessary so to distinguish him from Lord Colville of Culross) died
unmarried in March 1728, after having been in possession of the peerage
for fifty-seven years. Wodrow tells a gossip’s story about his lordship
having ‘walked’ for some time after his apparent departure from the earth.
After a comparatively private form of
entertainment had been in vogue some years, the lovers of harmony in
Edinburgh constituted themselves in 1728 into a regular society, with a
governor and directors, the entire number of members being seventy, and,
for the sake of room, transferred their meetings to St Mary’s Chapel,
where they continued to assemble for a long course of years. The progress
of their gay science is marked by the publication, in 1730, of a
collection of Scots tunes for the harpsichord or spinet by Adam Craig,
appropriately dedicated to the Honourable Lords and Gentlemen of the
Musical Society of Mary’s Chapel, as ‘generous encouragers and promoters
of music ‘—this collection being the first of the kind that was
published,’ although there were several previous collections containing
Scottish tunes, mingled with others.
June
At this time the house of the Rev. Mr M’Gill, minister of Kinross, was
represented as troubled with spirits. The first fact that excited
attention, was the disappearance of some silver spoons and knives, which
were soon after found in the barn, stuck up in straw, with a big dish all
nipped in pieces. Next it was found that no meat was brought to table but
what was stuck full of pins. The minister found one in an egg. His wife,
to make sure against trick, cooked some meat herself; but behold, when
presented at table, ‘there were several pins in it, particularly a big pin
the minister used for his gown. Another day, there was a pair of sheets
put to the green, among other people’s, which were all nipped to pieces,
and none of the linens belonging to others troubled. A certain night
several went to watch the house, and as one was praying, down falls the
press, wherein was abundance of lime-vessels, all broke to pieces; also at
one other time the spirits, as they call them, not only tore the clothes
that were locked up in a coffer, to pieces, but the very laps of a
gentlewoman’s hood, as she was walking along the floor, were clipped
away, as also a woman’s gown-tail and many other things not proper to
mention. A certain girl, eating some meat, turned so very sick, that,
being necessitate to vomit, (she) cast up five pins. A stone thrown down
the chimney wambled a space on the floor, and then took a flight out at
the window. There was thrown in the fire the minister’s Bible, which would
not burn; but a plate and two silver spoons melted immediately. ‘What
bread is fired, were the meal never so fine, it‘s all made useless. Is it
not very sad that such a godly family, that employ their time no otherwise
but by praying, reading, and serious meditation, should be so molested,
while others who are wicked livers, and in a manner avowedly serve the
Wicked One, are never troubled?
Wodrow, who relates these particulars, soon
after enters in his note-book: ‘I hear of a woman in Carstairs parish,
that has been for some time troubled with apparitions, and needs much
sympathy.’
It seems to have been a season of unusual
spiritual activity. During September, and for some time after, the house
of William Montgomery, mason, at Burnside, Scrabster, near Thurso, in the
extreme north of Scotland, was tormented in an unusual manner by cats,
which flocked in great numbers in and about his dwelling, making a
frightful noise. Montgomery himself was from home; but his wife was so
much troubled by this unaccountable pest, as to be obliged to write to
him requiring his return, as otherwise she would be obliged to remove to
Thurso. The goodman did return, and became witness to the torment that was
going on, as many as eight cats, totally unknown in the neighbourhood,
being sometimes assembled about his fireside in a single evening, ‘making
the night hideous.’ One servant-girl left service on account of the
nightly disturbance. Another, who came in her place, called to her master
one evening that ‘the cats were speaking among themselves,’ for so it had
appeared to her they were doing, so human-like were their cries.
On a particular night, the 28th of November,
Montgomery became unusually exasperated by these four-footed tormentors,
and resolved to attack them with lethal weapons. One having got into a
chest which had a hole in it, he watched with his drawn sword till he saw
the creature put her head out at the hole, when he struck hard, yet failed
to effect decapitation. Opening the chest, a servant named Geddes struck
the animal with his master’s dirk in her hinder quarter, pinning her to
the timber; yet after all she got out. Ultimately, Montgomery battered
this cat pretty effectually, and threw her out as dead ; nevertheless,
they found she had disappeared by the morning. Five nights thereafter,
some of the eats coming in upon Geddes in his bed, Montgomery dirked one,
and battered its head, till it appeared dead, when he flung it out of
doors. Before morning, it too had disappeared. He remarked that the wounds
he inflicted brought no blood.
As it bad been threatened that none should
thrive in his house, William Montgomery entertained no doubt that there
was witchcraft in the visitation. When an old woman in the neighbourhood
fell ill, he became confirmed in his surmise, and thought himself
justified in seeking the interference of the sheriff, though without
particularising any delinquent. By this officer, the case was slighted as
a piece of popular credulity and ignorance, till, one day in the ensuing
February, a certain old woman named Margaret Nin-Gilbert, living in Owst,
about a mile and a half from Montgomery’s house, ‘was seen by some of her
neighbours to drop at her own door one of her legs from the middle.’ So
narrates the sheriff. He adds: ‘She being under bad fame for witchcraft,
the leg, black and putrefied, was brought to me; and immediately
thereafter I ordered her to be apprehended and incarcerated.’
When old ladies begin to unhook their legs,
and leave them in public places, it is evident there must be something in
it. On the 8th of February, Margaret was examined in presence of two
ministers, a bailie, and four merchants of Thurso, and confessed that she
was in compact with the devil, who sometimes appeared to her as a great
black horse, sometimes as a black cloud, and sometimes like a black hen.
She owned to having been present as a cat in Montgomery’s house, along
with other women similarly transformed, when two of the latter had died of
the wounds inflicted by Montgomery, and she had had her leg broken by him,
so that in time it mortified and broke off. Margaret Olson, one of the
women she accused, was examined for witch-marks; and several small
coloured spots being detected, a needle was thrust in almost to the eye
without exciting the least pain; but neither she nor any other person
besides Nin-Gilbert could be induced to confess the practice of
witchcraft.
Lord Advocate Dundas heard, some weeks after,
what was going on in this remote corner of Scotland, and wrote a letter to
the sheriff; finding fault with him for proceeding without consultation
with the central authority. The local officer apologised on the ground,
that he only acted for the Earl of Breadalbane and Mr Sinclair of Ulbster,
and had deemed it proper to communicate directly with them. In the course
of a short time, Nin-Gilbert died in prison, and this seems to have been
an end to the affair.
Hitherto, no sort of literary or scientific
association had been formed in Scotland. For a long time bypast, almost
the only learning that existed was theological, and there was but little
of that. In this year, Thomas Ruddiman, who had distinguished himself in
Edinburgh by editing the works of Buchanan, and composing the well-known
Rudiments of the Latin Tongue, joined with the masters of the High School
of the city in establishing there an association for improving each other
in classical lore, without meddling with the affairs of church or state.’
This body was afterwards joined by a young advocate, subsequently eminent
as a judge and a philosophical writer under the name of Lord Kames;
afterwards, Mr Archibald Murray and Mr James Cochran, advocates, and Mr
George Wishart, one of the ministers of Edinburgh, with some others,
became members. ‘Whether their conversations were preserved, or their
dissertations published, cannot now be ascertained.’ |