1699, Jan
When the Bank of Scotland was started in 1695, there were no notes for
sums below five pounds. For the extension of the bank’s paper, there were
now issued notes for twenty shillings— ever since a most notable part of
the circulating medium in Scotland. These small notes readily got into use
in Edinburgh and some parts of the provinces; yet the hopes which some
entertained of their obtainiug a currency in public markets and fairs were
not at first realised—for, as one remarks thirty years later, ‘nothing
answers, there among the common people but silver money, even gold being
little known amongst them.’
Jan 30
The funeral of Lady Anne Hall, wife of Sir James Hall of Dunglass, took
place at the old church near her husband’s seat, and was attended by a
multitude of the nobility and other distinguished persons. A quarrel
happened between the respective coachmen of the Earls of Lothian and
Roxburgh, for precedence, ‘which was very near engaging the masters, but
was prevented.’ It appears that the two noble earls were aspirants for
promotion in the peerage, and thus were rendered more irritable.
Mar 2
After the Mereurius Caledonius had come to the end of its short and
inglorious career in 1661, there was no other attempt at a newspaper in
Scotland till 1680, when one was tried under the name of the Edinburgh
Gazette. This having likewise had a short life, nineteen years more
were allowed to elapse before the craving of the public mind for
intelligence of contemporary events called for another effort in the same
direction.
There was a gentleman hanging about Edinburgh, under
the name of Captain Donaldson; originally in trade there; afterwards an
officer in the Earl of Angus’s regiment, for which he had levied a company
at his own charge. He had been wounded in seven places at the battle of
Killiecrankie, and was confined for several weeks by the Highlanders in
Blair Castle. Finally turned adrift at the peace of Ryswick, with no
half-pay, he found himself in want of both subsistence and occupation,
when he bethought him of favouring his fellow-citizens with periodical
news. Having issued two or three trial-sheets, which were ‘approven of by
very many,’ be now obtained from the Privy Council an exclusive right to
publish ‘ane gazett of this place, containing ane abridgment of foraine
newes, together with the occurrences at home;’ and the Edinburgh
Gazette (the second of the name) accordingly began to make its
appearance at the date marginally noted.
Wisely calculating that news were as yet but a poor
field in our northern region, Donaldson supplemented the business of his
office with a typographical device on which more certain dependence could
be placed. He informed the Privy Council that he had fallen upon a wholly
new plan for producing funeral-letters— namely, to have the principal and
necessary parts done by characters ‘in fine writ,’ raised on ingots of
brass, leaving blanks for names, dates, and places of interment.
Stationery in this form would be convenient to the public, especially in
cases of haste, ‘besides the decencie and ornament of a border of
skeletons, mortheads, and other emblems of mortality,’ which he had ‘so
contrived that it may be added or subtracted at pleasure.’ The Lords,
entering into Donaldson’s views on this subject, granted him a monopoly of
his invention for nineteen years.
Very few months had the Gazette lived when it
brought its author into trouble. On the 8th of June he was suddenly
clapped in prison by the Privy Council, ‘for printing several things in
his Gazette which are not truths, and for which he has no warrant.’
Five days after, he came before them with a humble petition, in which he
set forth, that he had begun the Gazette under a sense of its
probable usefulness. ‘notwithstanding he was dissuaded by most of his
friends from attempting to undertake it, as a thing that could not defray
the charges of printing, intelligence, &c.’ Trusting that their Lordships
must now see how useful it is,’ he begged them to overlook what was amiss
in a late number, and ‘give him instructions how to act for the future.’
They liberated him, and at the same time made arrangemeiits for having the
Gazette duly revised by a
committee of their own body before printing.’
Donaldson will re-appear before us under date February
19, 1705.
Mar 16
Robert Logan, cabinet-maker, professed to have made an invention which
even the present inventive age has not seen repeated. He averred that he
could make kettles and caldrons of wood, which could ‘abide the strongest
fire,’ while boiling any liquor put into them, ‘as weel as any vessels
made of brass, copper, or any other metal,’ with the double advantage of
their being more durable and only a third of the expense. The Earl of
Leven having made a verbal report in favour of the invention, Robert
obtained a monopoly of it for ‘two nineteen years.’
Jun
Apostacy from the Protestant religion was held as a heinous crime in
Scotland. By an act of James VI, all persons who had been abroad were
enjoined, within twenty days after their return, to make public profession
of their adherence to ‘the true faith;’ otherwise to ‘devoid the kingdom’
within forty days. By another statute of the same monarch, an apostate to
popery was obliged to leave the country within forty days, ‘under highest
pains.’
The faithfully Presbyterian Lord
Advocate had now heard of a dreadful case in point. David Edie, formerly a
bailie of Aberdeen, having been some years abroad, was come home a papist,
everywhere boldly avowing his apostacy; nay, he might be considered as a
trafficking papist, for he had written a letter to Skene of Fintry,
containing the reasons which had induced him to make this disastrous
change. Already, the magistrates of his native city had had him up before
them on the double charge of apostacy and trafficking; but ‘he behaved
most contemptuously and insolently towards them, saying: "They acted
Hogan-Mogan-like; but he expected better times."’ It was therefore become
necessary to take the severest measures with him, ‘to the terror of others
to commit the like in time coming.’
On the 9th of November, David Edie
was brought before the Privy Council, and charged by the Lord Advocate and
Solicitor-general with the crime of apostacy, when he fully avowed his
change of opinion, and likewise his having written on the subject to Skene
of Fintry. He was consequently remitted to the Tolbooth of Edinburgh, to
remain there a prisoner during the pleasure of the Council. They were,
however, comparatively merciful with the ex-bailie, for, five days later,
they called him again before them, and passed upon him a final sentence of
banishment from the kingdom, he to be liberated in the meantime, in order
to make his preparations, on his granting due caution for his departure
within forty days.
July 17
The tacksmen of the customs and their officers were of course far from
being popular characters. The instinct for undutied liquors was strong in
the Scotch nature, and would occasionally work to unpleasant results. Two
waiters, named Forrest and Hunter, went at the request of the tacksmen to
Prestonpans, to try to verify some suspicions which were entertained
regarding certain practices in that black and venerable village. Finding
several ankers of sack and brandy hid in the house of Robert Mitchell,
skipper, they carried them to the Custom-house, and as they were
returning, they were assailed by a multitude of men and women, who ‘fell
desperately upon them, and did bruise and bleed them to ane admirable
height,’ robbing them, moreover, of their papers and fourteen pounds of
Scots money. Things might have been carried to a worse extremity, had not
the collector and others come up and diverted the rabble. As it was, one
of the men was so severely wounded, as to lie for some time after in the
chirurgeon’s hands.
A few days after, information being
given of an embezzlement at Leith, a few waiters were sent on the search,
and finding a number of half-ankers of brandy in a chest in a house in the
Coal-hill, carried them off to the Custom-house, but were assailed on the
way by a great rabble, chiefly composed of women, who beat them severely,
and rescued the goods.
The Lord Advocate was ordered by the Privy Council to
inquire into these doings, and take what steps might seem necessary.
1699, July
Whenever a gentleman at this time returned from France, he became an
object of suspicion to the government, on account of his having possibly
had some traffickings with the exiled royal family, with views to the
raising of disturbances at home. The Earl of Nithsdale having come from
that country in July, a committee of the Privy Council was sent to speak
with him, and ‘report what they find in the said earl’s deportment in
France or since he came therefrom.’ A few days afterwards, he was formally
permitted ‘to go borne and attend to his own affairs.’ In November, Graham
of Boquhapple, having returned from France ‘without warrant from his
majesty,’ was put up in the old Tolbooth, there to remain a close
prisoner till further order, but with permission for his family and a
physician to visit him. At the end of February, Graham, having given an
ingenuous account of himself as a worn-out old soldier of the Revolution,
was liberated.
July 18
From Ross-shire, a new batch of witches was reported, in the persons of
‘John Glass in Spittal; Donald M’Kulkie in Drumnamerk; Agnes Desk in
Kilraine; Agnes Wrath there; Margaret Monro in Milntown; Barbara Monro,
spouse to John Glass aforesaid; Margaret Monro, his mother; Christian
Gilash in Gilkovie; Barbara Rassa in Milntown; Mary Keill in Ferintosh;
Mary Glass in Newton; and Thick Shayme.’ All being ‘alleged guilty of the
diabolical crimes and charms of witchcraft,’ it was most desirable that
they should be brought to a trial, ‘that the persons guilty may receive
condign punishment, and others may be deterred from committing such crimes
and malefices in time coming;’ but the distauee was great, and travelling
expensive; so it was determined to issue a commission to Robertson of
Inshes and several other gentlemen of the district, for doing justice on
the offenders.
The proceedings of Mr Robertson and his associates were
duly reported in November, and a committee was appointed by the Privy
Couueil to consider it, that they might afterwards give their opinion,
‘whether the sentence mentioned in the said report should be put in
execution as pronounced or not.’ On the 2d of January 1700, the committee,
composed of the judges Rankeillor and Halcraig, reported that Margaret
Monro and Agnes Wrath had made confession—for them they recommended some
arbitrary punishment. Against John Glass in Spittal, and Mary
Keill in Ferintosh, it was their opinion that nothing had
been proved. The Council consequently assoilzied these persons from the
sentence which had been passed upon them by the local commissioners, and
ordered tbeir liberation from the jail of Fortrose. As to the other
persons, they adopted the proposal of an arbitrary punishment, remitting
to the committee to appoint what they thought proper.’ This is the first
appearance of an inclination in the central authorities to take mild views
of witchcraft. We are not yet, however, come to the last instance of its
capital punishment.
On the 20th of November 1702, Margaret Myles was hanged
at Edinburgh for witchcraft. According to a contemporary account: ‘The day
being come, she was taken from the prison to the place of execution. Mr
George Andrew, one of the preachers of this city, earnestly exhorted her,
and desired her to pray; but her heart was so obdured, that she answered
she could not; for, as she confessed, she was in covenant with the devil,
who had made her renounce her baptism. After which, Mr Andrew said: "Since
your heart is so hardened that you cannot pray, will you say the Lord’s
Prayer after me?" He began it, saying: "Our Father which art in heaven;"
but she answered: "Our Father which wart in heaven;" and by no means would
she say other-ways, only she desired he might pray for her. He told her:
"How could she bid him pray for her, since she would not pray for
herself." Then he sung two verses of the 51st Psalm, during which time she
seemed penitent; but when he desired her to say: "I renounce the devil,"
she said : "I unce the devil
;" for by no means would she say
distinctly that she renounced the devil, and adhered unto her baptism, but
that she unced the devil, and hered unto her baptism. The only sign of
repentance she gave was after the napkin had covered her face, for then
she said: "Lord, take me out of the devil’s hands, and put me in God’s."
July 25
The inventive spirit, of which we have seen so many traits within the last
few years, had entered the mind of the poor Englishman, Henry Neville
Payne, so long confined, without trial, under the care of the Scottish
government, on account of his alleged concern in a Jacobite conspiracy. In
a petition dated at Stirling Castle, he stated to the Privy Council, that
"though borne down with age, poverty, and a nine years’ imprisonment, he
is preparing ane experiment for river navigation, whereby safer,
larger, and swifter vessels may be made with far less charge than any now
in use.’ As this experiment, however, owing to the straitened
circumstances and personal confinement of the inventor, had cost ten times
more than it otherwise would have done, so did he find it could not be
perfected unless he were allowed personally to attend to it. He entreated
that, however they might be determined to detain him in Scotland, they
would, ‘in Christian compassion to his hard circumstances, permit him on
his parole, or moderate bail, to have freedom within some limited
confinement near this place, to go forth of the Castle, that he may duly
attend his business, as the necessity of it requires.’
The Council granted him liberty of half a mile’s range
from the Castle, during a limited portion of the day, under a guard.
Sep 15
In his Second Discourse on Public Affairs, published in 1698,
Fletcher of Salton made some statements regarding the multitude of the
vagrant poor in Scotland which have often been quoted. He remarked that,
owing to the bad seasons of this and the three preceding years, the evil
was perhaps now greater than it had ever been; ‘yet there have always been
in Scotland such numbers of poor, as by no regulations could ever be
ordinarily provided for; and this country has always swarmed with such
numbers of idle vagabonds, as no laws could ever restrain.’ He estimated
the ordinary nnmber of such people at a hundred thousand, and the present
at two hundred thousand—"vagabonds who live without any regard to the laws
of the land, or even those of God and nature.’ ‘No magistrate,’ he says,
‘could ever discover which way one in a hundred of these wretches died, or
that ever they were baptised. Many murders have been discovered among
them; and they are not only a most unspeakable oppression to poor tenants
(who, if they give not bread or some kind of provision to perhaps forty
such villains in a day, are sure to be insulted by them), but they rob
many poor people who live in houses distant from any neighbourhood. In
years of plenty, many thousands of them meet ‘toottlier in the mountains,
where they feast and riot for many days; and at country-weddings, markets,
burials, and other the like public occasions, they are to be seen, both
men and women, perpetually drunk, cursing, blaspheming, and fighting
together.’
To remedy this evil, Fletcher proposed in all
seriousness what reads like Swift’s suggestion to convert the children of
the Irish poor into animal food. He recommended that the great mass of the
able-bodied of these superfluous mortals should be reduced to serfdom
under such persons as would undertake to keep and employ them, arguing
that slavery amongst ancient states was what saved them from great burdens
of pauper population, and was a condition involving many great advantages
to all parties. He was for hospitals to the sick and lame, but thought it
would be well, for example and terror, to take three or four hundred of
the worst of the others, commonly called fockies, and present them
to the state of Venice, ‘to serve in the galleys against the common enemy
of Christendom.’
Most of the patriot’s contemporaries probably
acknowledged the existence of the evil which he described—though he
probably exaggerated it to the extent of at least a third—but there is no
appearance of the slightest movement having ever been made towards the
adoption of his remedy. A modern man can only wonder at such a scheme
proceeding from one whose patriotism was in general too fine for use, and
who held such views of the late tyrannical governments, that he was for
punishing their surviving instruments several years after the Revolution.
[The irascible temper of Fletcher is well
known, and his slaughter of an associate in the Monmouth expedition is a
historical fact. A strange story is told of him in Mrs Calderwood of
Polton’s account of her journey in Holland (Coltness Collections).
‘Saiton,’ she says, ‘could not endure the smoke of toback, and as he was
in a night—scoot [in Holland] the skipper and he fell out about his
forbidding him to smoke. Salton, finding he could not hinder him, went up
and sat on the ridge of the boat, which bows like an arch. The skipper was
so contentious that he followed him, and on whatever side Salton sat, he
put his pipe in the cheek next him, and whiffed in his face. Salton went
down several times and brought up stones in his pocket from the ballast,
and slipped them into the skipper's pocket that was next the water, and
when he found he had loadened hin as much as would sink him, he gives him
a shove, so that over he hirsled, The boat went on, and Salton came down
among the rest ef the passengers, who probably were asleep, and fell
asleep among the rest. In a little time, bump came the scoot against the
side, on which they all damned the skipper but, behold, when they called,
there was no skipper; which would breed no great amazement in a Dutch
company.']
The Privy Council issued a proclamation, adverting to
the non-execution of the laws for the poor during the time of the
scarcity, but intimating that better arrangements were rendered possible
by the plentiful harvest just realised. The plan ordered to be adopted was
to build correction-houses at Edinburgh, Dumfries, Ayr, Glasgow, Stirling,
Perth, Dundee, Aberdeen, and Inverness, each for the county connected with
the burgh, into which the poor should be received: no allusion is made to
the other counties. The poor were to be confined to the districts in which
they had had residence for the last three years. It was ordained of each
correction-house, that it should have ‘a large close sufficiently enclosed
for keeping the said poor people, that they be not necessitat to be always
within doors to the hurt and hazard of their health.’ And the magistrates
of the burghs were commanded to take the necessary steps for raising these
pauper-receptacles under heavy penalties.’
Nov 8
It was customary for the Lords of Privy Council to grant exclusive right
to print and vend books for certain terms—being all that then existed as
equivalent to our modern idea of copyright. Most generally, this right was
given to booksellers and printers, and bore reference rather to the
mercantile venture involved in the expense of producing the book, than to
any idea of a reward for authorcraft. Quite in conformity ‘with this old
view of literary rights, the Council now conferred on George Mossinan,
stationer in Edinburgh, ‘warrant to print and sell the works of the
learned Mr George Buchanan, in ane volume in folio, or by parts in lesser
volumes,’ and discharged ‘all others to print, import, or sell, the whole
or any part of the said Mr George his works in any volume or character,
for the space of nineteen years.’
In conformity with the same view of copyright, another
Edinburgh stationer, who, in 1684, had obtained a nineteen years’ title to
print Sir George Mackenzie’s Institutes of the Law of Scotland,
soon after this day was favoured with a renewal of the privilege, on his
contemplating a second edition.
Robert Sanders, printer in Glasgow, had printed a large
impression of a small book, entitled Merchandising Spiritualised, or
the Christian Merchant Trading to Heaven., by Mr James Clark, minister
at Glasgow; which, in Sanders’s opinion, was calculated to be ‘of
excellent use to good people of all ranks and degrees.’ For his
encouragement in the undertaking, he petitioned the Privy Council (July
13, 1703) for an exclusive right of publishing the book; and he was
fortified in his claim by a letter from the author, as well as a
‘testificat from Mr James Woodrow, professor of divinity at Glasgow, anent
the soundness of the said book.’ The Council, taking all these things into
account, gave Sanders a licence equivalent to copyright for nineteen
years.’
Nov 30
The abundant harvest of 1699 was acknowledged by a general thanksgiving.
But, that the people might not be too happy on the occasion, the king, in
the proclamation for this observance, was made to acknowledge that the
late famine and heavy mortality had been a just retribution of the
Almighty for the sins of the people; as likewise had been ‘several other
judgments, specially the frustrating the endeavours that have been made
for advancing the trade of this nation.' [The royal councillors were too
good Christians, or too polite towards their master, to insinuate as a
secular cause the subserviency of the king to English merchants jealous of
Scottish rivalry.] For these reasons, he said, it was proper, on the same
day, that there be solemn and fervent prayers to God, entreating him to
look mercifully on the sins of the people, and remove these, ‘the
procuring causes of all afflictions,’ and permit that ‘we may no more
abuse his goodness into wantonness and forgetfulness.’
The people of Scotland were poor, and lived in the most
sparing manner, When they made an honourable attempt to extend their
industry, that they might live a little better, their sovereign permitted
the English to ‘frustrate the endeavour.’ He then told them to humble
themselves for the sins which had procured their afflictions, and
reproached them with a luxury ‘which they had never enjoyed. The whole
affair reminds one of the rebuke administered by Father Paul to the
starved porter in The Duenna: ‘Ye eat, and swill, and
drink, and gormandise,’ &c.
Dec 11
Notwithstanding the abundance of the harvest., universally acknowledged a
fortnight before by solemn religious rites, there was already some alarm
beginning to arise about the future, chiefly in consequence of the very
natural movements observed among possessors of and dealers in grain, for
reserving the stock against eventual demands. There now, therefore,
appeared a proclamation forbidding export and encouraging import, the
latter step being ‘for the more effectual disappointing of the ill
practices of forestallers and regraters.’’
Dec 7
We have at this time a curious illustration of the slowness of all
travelling in Scotland, in a petition of Robert Irvine of Corinhaugh to
the Privy Council. He had been cited to appear as a witness by a
particular day, in the case of Dame Marjory Seton, relict of Lewis
Viscount of Frendraught, but he did not arrive till the day after, having
been ‘fully eight days upon the journey that he usually made in three,’ in
consequence of the unseasonableness of the weather, by which even the post
had been obstructed. The denunciation against him for non-appearance was
discharged.
1700, Jan
A case of a singular character was brought before the Court of Justiciary.
In the preceding July, a boy named John Douglas, son of Douglas of
Dornock, attending the school of Moffat, was chastised by his teacher, Mr
Robert Carmichael, with such extreme severity that he died on the spot.
The master is described in the indictment as beating and dragging the boy,
and giving him three lashings without intermission, so that when ‘let
down’ for the third time, he ‘could only weakly struggle along to his
seat, and never spoke more, but breathed out his last, and was carried
dying, if riot dead, out of the school.’ Carmichael fled, and kept out of
sight for some weeks, cut by the providence of God was discovered and
seized.’
‘The Lords decerned the said Mr Robert to be taken from
the Tolbooth of Edinburgh by the hangman under a sure guard to the middle
of the Laudmarket, and there lashed by seven severe stripes; then to be
carried down to the Cross, and there severely lashed by six sharp stripes;
and then to be carried to the Fountain Well, to be severely lashed by five
stripes; and then to be carried back by the hangman to the Tolbooth.
Likeas, the Lords banish the said Mr Robert furth of this kingdom, never
to return thereto under all highest pains.’
Robert Carmichael was perhaps only unfortunate in some
constitutional weakness of his victim. An energetic use of the lash was
the rule, not the exception, in the old school—nay, even down to
times of which many living persons may well say, ‘quaeque miserrima vidi,
et quorum pars magna fui.’ In the High School of Edinburgh about 1790, one
of the masters (Nicol) occasionally had twelve dunces to whip at once,
ranking them up in a row for the purpose. When all was ready, he would
send a polite message to his colleague, Mr Cruikshank, ‘to come and hear
his organ.’ Cruikshank having come, Mr Nicol would proceed to
administer a rapid cursory flagellation along and up and down the row,
producing a variety of notes from the patients, which, if he had been more
of a scientific musician, he might have probably called a bravura.
Mr Cruikshank was sure to take an early opportunity of inviting Mr Nicol
to a similar treat.
Jan
One of the most conspicuous persons at this time in Scotland— one of the
few, moreover, known out of his own country, or destined to be remembered
in a future age—was Dr Archibald Pitcairn. He practised as a physician in
Edinburgh, without an equal in reputation; but he was also noted as a man
of bright general talents, and of great wit and pleasantry. His habits
were convivial, after the manner of his time, or beyond it; and his
professional Delphi was a darkling tavern in the Parliament Close, which
he called the Greping Office (Latine, ‘Greppa’), by reason of the
necessity of groping in order to get into it. Here, in addition to all
difficulties of access, his patients must have found it a somewhat
critical matter to catch him at a happy moment, if it was true, as
alleged, that he would sometimes be drunk twice a day. It is also told of
him that, having given an order at home, that when detained overnight at
this same Greping Office, he should have a clean shirt sent to him by a
servant next morning, the rule was on one occasion observed till the
number of clean shirts amounted to six, all of which he had duly
put on; but, behold, when he finally re-emerged and made his way home, the
whole were found upon him, one above the other! Perhaps these are
exaggerations, shewing no more than that the habits of the clever doctor
were such as to have excited the popular imagination. It was a matter of
more serious moment, that Pitcairn was insensible to the beauties of the
Presbyterian polity and the logic of the Calvinistie faith—being for this
reason popularly labelled as an atheist—and that, in natural connection
with this frame of opinion, he was no admirer of the happy revolution
government.
He had, about this time, written a letter to his
friend, Dr Robert Gray, in London; and Captain Bruce, a person attached to
the service of the Duke of Hamilton, had sent it to its destination under
a cover. It fell, in London, into the hands of the Scottish
Secretary, Seafleld, who immediately returned it to the
Lord Chancellor in Edinburgh, as one of a dangerous character towards the
government. The Lord Chancellor immediately caused Dr Pitcairn and Captain
Bruce to be apprehended and put into the Tolbooth, each in a room by
himself. On the letter being immediately after read to the Privy Council
(January 16), they entirely approved of what had been done, and gave
orders for a criminal process being instituted before them against the two
gentlemen.
On the 25th of January, Pitcairn was brought before the
Council on a charge of contravening various statutes against
leasing-making—that is, venting and circulating reproaches and false
reports against the government. He was accused of having, on a certain day
in December, written a letter to Dr Gray in reference to an address which
was in course of signature regarding the meeting of parliament. This, be
said, was going on unanimously throughont the nation, only a few courtiers
and Presbyterian ministers opposing it, and that in vain; ‘twice so many
have signed since the proclamation anent petitioning as signed it before.’
‘He bids him [Dr Gray] take notice that there is one sent to court, with a
title different, to beguile the elect of the court, if it were possible.’
‘And all the corporations and all the gentlemen have signed the address,
and himself among the rest; and it is now a National Covenant, and, by
Jove, it would produce a national and universal—;
to which he adds that he is thinking after a lazy way to
reprint his papers, but hopes there shall be news ere they are printed,
and that he is calculating the force of the musculi abdominis in
digesting meat, and is sure they can do it, une belle affaire.'
In the letters of charge brought forward by the Lord
Advocate, it was alleged that there were here as many falsehoods as
statements, and. the object of the whole to throw discredit on the
government was manifest. One of his allegations was the more offensive as
he had sought to confirm it ‘by swearing profanely as a pagan, and not as
a Christian, "by Jove, it will produce a national and universal
—," which
blank cannot be construed to have a less import than a national and
universal overturning.’ Seeing it clearly evidenced that he had ‘foolishly
and wickedly meddled in the affairs of his majesty and his estate, he
ought to be severely punished in his person and goods, to the terror of
others to do the like in time coming.’
Dr Pitcairn, knowing well the kind of men he had to
deal with, made no attempt at defence; neither did he utter any complaint
as to the violation of his private correspondence. He pleaded that he had
written in his cups with no evil design against the government, and threw
himself entirely on the mercy of the Council. His submission was accepted,
and he got off with a reprimand from the Lord Chancellor, after giving
bond with his friend Sir Archibald Stevenson, under two hundred pounds
sterling, to live peaceably under the government, and consult and contrive
nothing against it.
Feb 3
This is the date of a conflagration in Edinburgh, which made a great
impression at the time, and was long remembered. It broke out in one of
the densest parts of the city, in a building between the Cowgate and
Parliament Close, about ten o’clock of a Saturday night. ilere, in those
days, lived men of no small importance. We are told that the fire
commenced in a closet of the house of Mr John Buchan, being that below the
residence of Lord Crossrig, one of the judges. Part of his lordship’s
family was in bed, and he was himself retiring, when the alarm was given,
and he and his family were obliged to escape without their clothes.
‘Crossring, naked, with a child under his oxter [armpit], happing for his
life,' is cited as onr of the sad sights of the night. 'When people were
sent into his closet to help out with his cabinet and papers, the smoke
was so thick that they only got out a small cabinet with great difficulty.
Albeit his papers were lying about the floor, or hung about the walls of
his closet in pocks, yet they durst not stay to gather them up or take
them...... so that that cabinet, and his servant [clerk]'s lettron [desk],
which stood near the door of the lodging, with some few other things, was
all that was saved, and the rest, even to his lordship’s wearing-clothes,
were burnt!’ According to an eye-witness, the fire continued to burn all
night and till ten o’clock on Sunday morning, ‘with the greatest frayor
and vehemency that ever I saw a fire do, notwithstanding that I saw
London burn.' ‘The flames were so terrible, that none durst come near to
quench it. It was a very great wind, which blew to such a degree, that,
with the sparks that came from the fire, there was nothing to be seen
through the whole city, but as it had been showers of sparks, like showers
of sr:ow, they were so thick.’
‘There are burnt, by the easiest computation, between
three and four hundred families; the pride of Edinburgh is sunk; from the
Cowgate to the High Street, all is burnt, and hardly one stone left upon
another. The Commissioner, the President of Parliament, the President of
the Court of Session [Sir Hugh Dalrymple], the Bank [of Scotland], most of
the lords, lawyers, and clerks were burnt, besides many poor families. The
Parliament House very nearly [narrowly] escaped; all registers confounded
[the public registers being kept there]; clerk's chambers and processes in
such a confusion, that the lords and officers of state are just now met in
Ross's tavern, in order to adjourn the session by reason of the disorder.
Few people are lost, if any at all, but thewre was neither heart nor hand
left among them for saving from the fire, nor a drop of water in the
cisterns. Twenty thousand hands flitting [removing] their trash, they knew
not where, and hardly twenty at work. Many rueful spectacles, &c.'
The Town Council recorded their sense of this calamity
as a fearful rebuke of God,’ and the Rev. Mr Willison of Dundee did not
omit to improve the occasion. ‘In Edinburgh,’ says he,
‘where Sabbath-breaking very much abounded, the fairest and
stateliest of its buildings, in the Parliament Close and about it (to
which scarce any in Britain were comparable), were on the fourth of
February (being the Lord’s Day), burnt down and laid in ashes and ruins in
the space of a few hours, to the astonishment and terror of the sorrowful
inhabitants, whereof I myself was an eye-witness. So great was the terror
and confusion of that Lord’s Day, that the people of the city were in no
case to attend any sermon or public worship upon it, though there was a
great number of worthy ministers convened in the place (beside the
reverend ministers of the city) ready to have prayed with or preached to
the people on that sad occasion, for the General Assembly was sitting
there at the time. However, the Lord himself; by that silent Sabbath, did
loudly preach to all the inhabitants of the city,’ &c.
Some of the houses burnt on this occasion, forming part
of the Parliament Square, were of the extraordinary altitude of fourteen
stories, six or seven of which, however, were below the level of the
ground on the north side. These had been built about twenty years before
by Thomas Robertson, brewer, a thriving citizen, who is described in his
epitaph in the Greyfriars’ churchyard as ‘remarkable for piety towards
God, loyalty towards his prince, love to his country, and civility towards
all persons;’ while he was also, by these structures, ‘urbis exornator, si
non conditor," But Robertson, as youngest bailie, had given the Covenant
out of his hand to be burnt at the Cross in 1661; and ‘now God in his
providence hath sent a burning among his lands, so that that which was
eleven years a-building, was not six hours of burning. Notwithstanding
this, he was a good man, and lamented to his death the burning of the
Covenant; he was also very helpful to the Lord’s prisoners during the late
persecution.'
There being no insurance against fire in those days,
the heirs of Robertson were reduced from comparative affluence to poverty,
and the head of the family was glad to accept the situation of a captain
in the city guard, and at last was made a pensioner upon the city’s
charge.
Amongst the burnt out has been mentioned the Bank of
Scotland. ‘The directors and others concerned did with great care and
diligence carry off all the cash, bank-notes, books, and papers in the
office; being assisted by a party of soldiers brought from the Castle by
the Earl of Leven, then governor thereof, and governor of the bank, who,
with the Lord Ruthven, then a director, stood all the night directing and
supporting the soldiers, in keeping the stair and passage from being
overcrowded. But the Company lost their lodging and whole furniture in
it.’
Lord Crossrig, who suffered so much by this fire, tells
us in his Diary, that in the late evil times—that is, before the
Revolution— he had been a member of a society that met every Monday
afternoon ‘for prayer and conference.’ Since their deliverance, such
societies had gone out of fashion, and profanity went on increasing till
it came to a great height. Hearing that there were societies setting up in
England for reformation of manners,’ and falling in with a book that gave
an account of them, he bethought him how desirable it was that something
of the sort should be attempted in Edinburgh, and spoke to several friends
on the subject. There was, consequently, a meeting at his house in
November 1699, at which were present Mr Francis Grant (subsequently Lord
Cullen); Mr Matthew Sinclair; Mr William Brodie, advocate;
Mr Alexander Dundas, physician, and some other persons, who then
determined to form themselves into such a society, under sanction of some
of the clergy. The schedule of rules for this fraternity was signed on the
night when the fire happened.
‘This,’ says Crossrig, 'is a thing I remark as notable,
which presently was a rebuke to some of us for some fault in our solemn
engagement there, and probably Satan blew that coal to ‘witness his
indignation at a society designedly entered into in opposition to the
Kingdom of Darkness, and in hopes that such an occurrence should dash our
society in its infancy, and discourage us to proceed therein. However,
blessed be our God, all who then met have continued steadfast ever since
. . . . and we have had many meetings
since that time, even during the three months that I lived at the Earl of
Winton’s lodging in the Canongate. Likeas, there are several other
societies of the same nature set up in this city.’’
Feb
The burning out of the Bank of Scotland was not more than twenty days
past, when a trouble of a different kind fell upon it. ‘One Thomas M’Gie,
who was bred a scholar, but poor, of a good genius and ready wit, of an
aspiring temper, and desirous to make an appearance in the world, but
wanting a fund convenient for his purpose, was tempted to try his hand
upon bank-notes. At this time all the five kinds of notes—namely, £100,
£50, £20, £10, and £5—were engraven in one and the same character. He, by
artful razing, altered the word five in the five-pound note, and made it
fifty. But good providence discovered the villainy before he had done any
great damage, by means of the check-book and a record kept in the office;
and the rogue was forced to fly abroad. The check-book and record are so
excellently adapted to one another, and well contrived; and the keeping
them right, and applying thereof, is so easy, that no forgery or falsehood
of notes can be imposed upon the bank for any sum of moment, before it is
discovered. After discovering this cheat of M'Gie, the company caused
engrave new copper-plates for all their notes, each of a different
character, adding several other checks; so that it is not in the power of
man to renew M’Gie’s villainy.’
Feb
The glass-work at Leith made a great complaint regarding the ruinous
practice pursued by the work at Newcastle, of sending great quantities of
their goods into Scotland. The English makers had lately landed at
Montrose no less than two thousand six hundred dozen of bottles, ‘which
will overstock the whole country with the commodity.’ On their petition,
the Lords of the Privy Council empowered the Leith Glass Company to send
out officers to seize any such English bottles and bring them in for his
majesty’s use.
Mar 14
The ill-reputed governments of the last two reigns put down unlicensed
worship among the Presbyterians, on the ground that the conventicles were
schools of disaffection. The present government acted upon precisely the
same principle, in crushing attempts at the establishment of Episcopal
meeting-houses. The commission of the General Assembly at this time
represented to the Privy Council that the parishes of Eyemouth, Ayton, and
Coldingham were ‘very much disturbed by the setting up of Episcopal
meeting-houses, whereby the people are withdrawn from their duty to his
majesty, and all good order of the church violat.’ On the petition of the
presbytery of Chirnside, backed by the Assembly Commission, the Privy
Council ordained that the sheriff shut up all these meeting-houses, and
recommended the Lord Advocate to ‘prosecute the pretended ministers
preaching at the said meeting-houses, not qualified according to law, and
thereby not having the protection of the government!
This policy seems to have been effectual for its
object, for in the statistical account of Coldingham, drawn up near the
close of the eighteenth century, the minister reports that there were no
Episcopalians in his parish. It is but one of many facts which might be
adduced in opposition to the popular doctrine, that persecution is
powerless against religious conviction.
Notwithstanding the many serious and the many
calamitous things affecting Scotland, there was an under-current of
pleasantries and jocularities, of which we are here and there fortunate
enough to get a glimpse. For example—in Aberdeen, near the gate of the
mansion of the Earl of Errol, there looms out upon our view a little cozy
tavern, kept by one Peter Butter, much frequented of students in Marischal
College and the dependents of the magnate here named. The former called it
the Colleqium Butterense, as affecting to consider it a sort of
university supplementary to, and necessary for the completion of, the
daylight one which their friends understood them to be attending. Here
drinking was study, and proficiency therein gave the title to degrees.
Even for admission, there was a theme required, which consisted in
drinking a particular glass to every friend and acquaintance one had in
the world, with one more. Without these possibly thirty-nine or more
articles being duly and unreservedly swallowed, the candidate was
relentlessly excluded. On being accepted, a wreath was conferred, and
Master James Hay, by virtue of the authority resting in him under the
rules of the foundation, addressed the neophyte:
Potestatem do tibique
Compotandi bibendique,
Ac sumrna pocula implendi,
Et haustus exhauriendi,
Cujusve sint capacitatis,
E rotundis ant quadratis.
In signum ut manumittaris,
Adornet caput hic galerus,
Quod tibi felix sit faustumque,
Obnixe comprecor multumque.
There were theses, too, on suitably convivial ideas—as, for
example:
‘Gainst any man of sense,
Asserimus ex pacto,
Upon his own expense,
Quod vere datur ens
Potabile de facto...
If you expect degrees,
Drink off your cup and fill,
We’re not for what you please:
Our absolute decrees
Admit of no free-will.....
The longer we do sit,
The more we hate all quarrels,
(Let none his quarters flit),
The more we do admit
Of vacuum in barrels. &c.
Or else:
For to find out a parallaxis
We’ll not our minds apply,
Save what a toast in Corbreed makes us;
Whether the moon moves on her axis,
Ask Black and Gregory.
That bodies are à parte rei,
To hold we think it meetest;
Some cold, some hot, some moist, some dry,
Though all of them ye taste and try,
The fluid is the sweetest.
Post sextant semi hora
At night, no friend refuses
To come lavare ora;
Est melior guam Aurorad
And fitter for the Muse; &c.
A. diploma conferred upon George Durward, doubtless not
without very grave consideration of his pretensions to the honour, is
couched in much the same stram as the theses:
To all and sundry who shall see this,
Whate’er his station or degree is,
We, Masters of the Buttery College,
Send greeting, and to give them knowledge,
That George Durward, praesentium lator,
Did study at our Alma Mater
Some years, and hated foolish projects,
But stiffly studied liquid logics;
And now he’s as well skilled in liquor
As any one that blaws a bicker;
For he can make our college theme
A syllogism or enthymeme....
Since now we have him manumitted,
In arts and sciences well fitted,
To recommend him we incline
To all besouth and north the line,
To black and white, though they live as far
As Cape Good-Hope and Madagascar,
Him to advance, because he is
Juvenis bonae indolis, &c.
We have, however, no specimen of the wit of this fluid
university that strikes us as equal to a Catalogus Librorum in
Bibliotheed Butterensi; to all external appearance, a dry list of
learned books, while in reality comprehending the whole paraphernalia of a
tavern. It is formally divided into ‘Books in large folio,’ Books in
lesser folio,’ ‘Books in quarto,’ ‘Books in octavo,’ and ‘Lesser Volumes,’
just as we might suppose the university catalogue to have been. Amongst
the works included are: ‘Maximilian Malt-kist de principiis
liquidorum—Kireherus Kettles de codem themate—Bueket’s Hydrostaticks—Opera
Bibuli Barrelli, ubi de conservatione liquoris, et de vacuo, problematice
disputatur— Constantinus Chopinus de philosophicis bibendi legibus, in
usum Principalis, curâ Georgii Leith [described in a note as a
particularly assiduous pupil of the college] 12 tom.—Compendium ejus, for
weaker capacities—Barnabius Beer-glass, de lavando gutture—Manuale
Gideonis Gill, de Syllogismiis concludentibus—Findlay Fireside, de
circulari poculorum motu,’ &c. One may faintly imagine how all this
light-headed nonsense would please Dr Pitcairn, as he sat regaling himself
in the Greping Office, and how the serious people would shake their heads
at it when they perused it at full length, a few years afterwards, in
Watson’s Collection of Scots Poems.
July 31
The commissioners of the General Assembly, considering the impending
danger of a late harvest and consequent scarcity, and the other distresses
of the country, called for the 29th day of August being solemimised by a
fast. In the reasons for it, they mention the unworthy repining at the
late providences, and ‘that, under our great penury and dearth, whilst
some provoked God by their profuse prodigality, the poorest of the people,
who suffered most, and who ought thereby to have been amended, have rather
grown worse and worse.’
Duncan Robertson, a younger son of the deceased Laird
of Struan, had fallen out of all good terms with his mother, apparently in
consequence of some disputes about their respective rights. Gathering an
armed band of idle ruffians, he went with them to his mother’s
jointure-lands, and laid them waste; he went to a ‘room’ or piece of land
occupied by his sister Margaret, and carried off all that was upon it; he
also ‘laid waste any possession his other sister Mrs Janet had.’ When a
military party, posted at Cane, came to protect the ladies, he fired on
it, and afterwards plainly avowed to the commander that his object was to
dispossess his mother and her tenants. By this cruel act, Lady Struan and
her other children had been ‘reduced to these straits and difficulties,
that they had not whereupon to live.’
Aug 2
The Privy Council gave orders for the capture of Duncan Robertson, and his
being put in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh, and kept there till further
orders. |