DR. PHILIP'S ADMINISTRATION: 1820 - 1850
D. PHILIP landed at Cape Town on
Feb. 26, 1819. The conditions under which he first visited Africa were
these:
'In the year 118, the Directors of
the London Missionary Society felt the absolute necessity of again sending
a deputation of their Society to South Africa, to investigate into the
real situation of their missions, and into the nature of the allegations
urged against them by the colonial government, as the grounds of the
opposition made to them. Mr. Campbell and myself were nominated and
appointed as a deputation from the Society for this purpose. He was to
make a visit, and return to England; and I agreed to remain five years in
the country, that I might be able to gain a more thorough knowledge of the
actual state of the missions, set them in order, and, if possible, secure
the cordial cooperation of the colonial government in their favour. My
appointment, and that of Mr. Campbell, for these specific objects, was
communicated by a deputation from the Society to Lord Bathurst, when his
lordship signified his approbation of the measure, and expressed his hope
that our mission would be attended with the beneficial results
anticipated.
With the cordial co-operation of
the governor, Lord Charles Somerset, Mr. Campbell and Dr. Philip were
making all needful preparations in 1819 for their visit of inspection to
the mission-stations, when Moffat arrived at Cape Town with the notorious
Africaner in his train. Dr. Philip had lost no time in securing a central
site for a chapel at Cape Town and in obtaining government permission to
erect suitable buildings. This was the beginning of Union Chapel in which
for so many years he was to minister. On May 4, 1819, Campbell and Philip,
accompanied by the missionaries Moffat and Evan Evans, started on their
long journey. They visited the Paarl, Tulbagh, Caledon Institution,
Pacaltsdorp, Bethelsdorp, and Theopolis. They had gone thus far when the
outbreak of war with the Kafirs prevented further work in that direction.
So Dr. Philip returned to Cape Town, while Mr. Campbell, in January, 1820,
journeyed with Mr. and Mrs. Moffat to New Lattakoo, visiting also some of
the neighbouring Bechwana centres of population. Mr. Campbell left Cape
Town on Feb. 15, 1821, and landed at Portsmouth on May 9. Meanwhile, Dr.
Philip completed the arrangements for the erection of Union Chapel, and
secured premises as part of the same establishment to serve as a dwelling
for the Society's agent, and as a temporary home for the many missionaries
passing through Cape Town. The chapel was opened for public worship on
Dec. 1, 1822.
In October, 1818, the Directors
had issued a new code of regulations for the missions in Africa,' two of
which we give in extenso. 'It is a duty which the Directors owe to the
great cause of propagating the Gospel among the heathen, no less than to
the Society for which they act, to press on the attention of all their
missionaries the obligation of finding their support from the people among
whom they labour. This principle is of the greatest importance, and the
acting upon it in any station will be in itself a security for the
progress of the Gospel in that place. But while the principle is kept in
view, so long as the circumstances of particular missions shall make it
absolutely necessary, the Directors will afford to the missionaries a
suitable support.
'That the following resolution of
the Board on May 2, 18 181 be adopted as one of the present Regulations:
"That to keep the persons of men or women in a state of slavery is
inconsistent with the principles of the Christian religion, and with the
character of a Christian missionary; and that if any missionary in
connection with this Society shall, after the communication of this
Resolution, be chargeable with this offence, the relation between such
person and this Society is by that act dissolved, and all obligation on
the part of the latter to contribute to his support immediately ceases."'
In 1820 Dr. Philip was appointed
by the Directors Superintendent of the Society's missions in South Africa,
and upon him came the much-needed work of consolidation, improvement of
methods, reform of abuses, and the task of welding the various missions
into a harmonious and effective whole. This appointment was an event of
great moment to the after history of both the Society's work, and also of
the Colony. Dr. Philip was in the prime of life, he had been minister of
one of the most important churches in Aberdeen, and he was a man of
cultured mind, experienced in affairs, of independent judgment, and of
strong will. He went out under the conviction, then common in England,
that the cruelties and oppression from which the native races had suffered
under Dutch rule had been largely ameliorated by the transfer of power to
England. But he was soon undeceived, and he had hardly assumed the full
responsibilities of his new position before he began that course of
ceaseless, energetic, and successful toil on behalf of the native races,
which made him for long years the most unpopular man in South Africa among
large sections of the colonists. In fact, the true standard of the good
work he did, and the vast influence he exerted on the side of liberty,
justice for all, and true progress, is the bitter hate with which those
pursued him whose errors he combated, whose cruelties he exposed, whose
tyranny he checked, and whose vices he condemned.
Before turning to the great
extensions of work undertaken subsequent to 1820 in Bechwanaland,
Matabeleland, and Central Africa, we will complete the sketch of the work
attempted within the Colony. We cannot give here a detailed account of the
struggle which resulted first in the abolition of slavery in the Colony,
then in the curbing under Lord Gleneig of colonial rapacity and
indifference to native rights, and finally in the settlement of the South
African colonies under systems of government and administration which were
no longer a discredit to the British name. But the salient points at least
must be indicated in a struggle which obtained for the natives some
approximation to civil rights, which largely extended British commerce,
which planted and developed civilization in many parts of Africa long
years before it would otherwise have reached them, and which has carried
the light of the Gospel from Cape Town to Ujiji; and from the mouth of the
Orange River to Madagascar.
The state even of Cape Town at
this time may be judged from a letter, dated January 11, 1820, sent to the
Directors by Dr. Philip, in which he states 'there are at this moment
above 7,000 slaves in Cape Town, and of that number there are not more
than thirty-five or fifty at most under Christian instruction.' The same
letter contains the statement that slaves were punished by their masters
for going to school, and also this: A lady who resides in my neighbourhood
informed me that she had seen a Hottentot servant in my family reading her
Bible; that she hoped I would take the Bible from her, and that I would
beat her with a stick the next time I found her with a Bible.' The
population of Cape Town at the end of 1818 was—whites, 7,460; free blacks,
1,905; apprentices (practically slaves), 810; Hottentots, 56; slaves,
7,462; total, 18,173. 'This statement,' Dr. Philip adds, 'will show you
the need we have for a chapel at Cape Town. Without a place for worship on
the Sabbath, and on the week days for teaching the slaves, nothing
effective can be be accomplished here.
Prior to Dr. Philip's arrival,
there had been a strong tendency on the part of the Government to regulate
the movements of the missionaries, at one time prohibiting their departure
to stations outside the limits of the Colony, at another recalling them.
But as early as December 28, 1820, he was able to write, 'We can now send
missionaries where we will.'
The financial arrangements between
the Society and its missionaries had hitherto been haphazard, and they had
been further complicated by the fact that the Netherlands Society, and
also the local Society at the Cape, had possessed independent authority
and responsibility in both the appointment and the support of
missionaries. These details, consequently, occupied much of Dr. Philip's
attention during his earlier years in Cape Town. and finally during his
stay in England in 1826 the Board passed the following resolutions: 'That
the salaries of the missionaries in Africa be in future as follows: A
single missionary or missionary artisan, £75; a married missionary or
missionary artisan, £100; for every child, £5.' This scale was the result
of a lengthy correspondence on finance between the missionaries and the
Board.
The regulation on slavery
emphasizes the fact that Christian missionaries could not possibly live
and work in South Africa during the first forty years of the nineteenth
century without coming into sharp conflict with some of the social and
political regulations and conditions which obtained there. We have seen in
Chapter XVI how, in the same way, Vanderkemp was forced into conflict with
colonial opinion and practice when he tried to evangelize the Hottentots.
Dr. Philip was soon to pass through a similar experience. No aphorism is
more common in the press of to-day, and no principle has been more
steadily acted upon by the great missionary societies of Europe and
America, than that missionaries, as such, have nothing to do with
politics. Sound as this maxim may be, it is from the Christian standpoint
inevitable that if the Government of a country allies itself with cruelty,
social wrongs, and oppression, the Christian missionary, working within
the sphere of such Government, must find himself in active opposition to
such things. Against slavery as it existed in Africa and the West Indies
in 1825 against such treatment as the colonists of South Africa in 1825
meted out to Hottentots and Kafirs; against such Government support as was
given in India to idol-worship at the same date; against such monstrous
evils as the opium traffic with China, all missionaries must ever strive
and labour and pray.
Dr. Philip spent much time in
visiting the various mission- stations, and by this natural and necessary
course of action he soon found himself in opposition to colonial public
opinion and to some departments of colonial administration. Readers who
wish to understand this question thoroughly should consult on the one hand
such books as the "History Of the colony of the Cape of Good Hope", by A.
Wilmot and John Centhivres Chase (1869), and "South Africa", by G. M.
Theal (1894). From them he will learn how constantly every question
connected with the South African native is looked at from the point of
view of the colonist's pocket. Either no credit at all is given to
missionaries or missionary labours, or else it is rendered in such an
ungracious manner as to arouse the conviction that while feebly blessing
it they would much rather curse it. Missionaries are to be endured chiefly
because Government tolerates them. The natives are of value only so far as
they can be compelled to aid the white man in building up his fortunes. On
the other side, he should study such books as Dr. Philip's Researches in
South Africa (1828), Moffat's Missionary Labours and Scenes in South
Africa (1842), and Livingstone's Missionary Travels and Researches in
South Africa (1837). In these books he finds the Hottentot and the Kafir
regarded as human beings entitled to the same moral and spiritual rights
as ourselves. He will further see on reflection that the very unpopularity
of this advocacy is the best answer to all the strictures and malevolent
attacks of its opponents.
As early as 1809, Colonel Collins
urged that Bethelsdorp should be suppressed, on the cynical grounds that
Vanderkemp had admitted his non-success; that the institution was designed
not to benefit the colony but the Hottentots; and that the Hottentots
might be made useful to the farmers. In 1809, Lord Caledon issued the
famous proclamation I intended for the regulation of all affairs connected
with the Hottentots, and designed as a protection for them against
oppression. Lord Caledon appears to have been touched by the sufferings of
these unhappy people, brought under his notice in i8o8 by some of
themselves; but in drafting the proclamation he fell into the hands of men
deeply interested in oppressing the Hottentots still further. and astute
enough to use even this proclamation for their purpose. The result of the
proclamation in its practical working was in the vast majority of cases,
to condemn the Hottentots to a servitude that was really worse than
slavery, and from which there was no escape. The Dutch Boer or English
colonist, who had purchased his slave, to that extent took care of him, if
only because he represented capital. Of the Hottentot, to whom he paid
only a nominal wage, whom he constantly defrauded even of this, and whose
labour he could have for the asking, he took- no care whatever. If through
either his cruelty, oppression, or neglect, the Hottentot died, his place
could speedily be filled by others, doomed to tread the same hopeless
path. In 1812 the condition of the Hottentots was rendered still worse by
a proclamation enabling a colonist to claim any child of a Hottentot born
upon his premises, and who had reached the age of eight years, as an
'apprentice' for the next ten years. Here again the theory was that the
Hottentot neglected his child, the tender and humane colonist would
cherish it. 'It is difficult to say,' writes Dr. Philip, 'which is most to
be deprecated, the injustice, the inhumanity, or the pernicious
consequences of this regulation.' Here is one example of how this system
worked:
In a journey which I made into the
interior of the colony in 1825, I lodged two nights at the house of a
respectable farmer, who had a number of Hottentots in his service, that
had belonged to the missionary station of Zuurbrack before it was broken
up in consequence of the measures pursued by the colonial government.
Pointing to one family, consisting of ten brothers, the greater part of
them born on the missionary institution, he remarked to me with great
simplicity, " That family, sir, is my wealth: they are better to me than
slaves, for they cost me nothing; and I shall have them apprenticed to me
till they are twenty-five, perhaps till they are twenty-nine years of age,
and perhaps I may be able to keep them for ever.
In 1814 a direct blow was aimed at
the missionary institutions by the Opgaaf, or tax, which was levied only
upon Hottentots in them. This tax was fixed at the monstrous amount of
two-thirds of their possible annual earnings. It was perfectly well known
that the natives could not pay the tax, and the end aimed at was to get
them away from the institutions, shut them up in prison from inability to
pay, and then compel them to enter into the service of colonists. The
charge was constantly made that the missionary institutions collected the
rebellious and discontented, encouraged them in laziness, and injured the
colonists by preventing them from availing themselves of native labour.
Any man of average common sense, who studies the facts, will see that the
great vice of all missionary institutions, in the eyes of the colonists,
was that they enabled the Hottentot to learn that, as a human being, he
had rights; they taught him to claim these rights, they often enabled him
to secure them, and they confronted Dutchman and Englishman alike with a
power that said, 'You shall not enslave and oppress and harry to death,
just as you will, men whose great offence is that they are the aboriginal
inhabitants of the land you covet.
It was as absurd in 1825, on the
ground of probability, as it is now on the surer ground of experience, for
the supporters of missions to expect marvellous results from these
institutions. The Hottentots in them often were lazy and ungrateful, and
sometimes the institutions may have become havens of refuge to Hottentot
Ishmaels. Nothing was more natural. But even where the institution
contained a few of such men, they and all their fellow-natives came in the
missionary institution under the care of men who for Christ's sake were
striving to educate them, to train them into habits of industry, to awaken
the soul in them. At such institutions the average colonist of the first
quarter of the nineteenth century was the last person in the world
entitled to throw stones.
On the other hand, it would be
equally absurd to believe that all colonists who employed Hottentot labour
cruelly oppressed their serfs. There were good colonists, as there were up
to 1863 good slaveholders in the United States. But the system in both
cases was detestable, and no amount of virtue in the men who worked it
could make the system which obtained in South Africa prior to the
legislation of 1836, other than abhorrent to all lovers of human freedom
and progress.
The chief point of attack in the
colonial hostility to missions was Bethclsdorp. Dr. Philip's description
of what he found there on his first visit shows that there was great need
for renewed effort, and more careful superintendence:
'The system of oppression, of
which Dr. Vanderkemp so bitterly complained, and under which he sunk into
his grave with a broken heart, had been carried on for years without a
single check. The institution was virtually converted into a slave lodge,
and the people were called out to labour at Uitenhage, to work on the
public roads, to cultivate the lands of the local authorities, or to serve
their friends, or the colonial government, receiving for these labours
never more than a trifling remuneration, and very frequently none at all.
In addition to the daily oppressions exercised upon the people, we found
that seventy of the men had been employed for six months in the Caffer
war. For this service they received nothing but rations for themselves:
nothing in the shape of wages was allowed to their families; and the
women, to keep themselves and children from starving, were under the
necessity of contracting debts among the farmers, to be liquidated by the
personal service of the husbands on their returning from Cafferland. To
these circumstances I must refer for the cause of the deplorable condition
in which the deputation found the spiritual and temporal affairs of this
mission. In such a state of wretchedness, we could neither look for
cleanliness nor industry: robbed of the fruits of their industry, the
people had no motive to labour, and the place of worship was deserted.
In 1821, James Kitchingman became
superintendent of Bethelsdorp, assisted by James Read. Education was more
carefully tended, and in accordance with the early policy of the Society,
Dr. Philip took immediate steps to protect the Hottentots at I3ethelsdorp
from this crushing persecution, to stimulate their industry, and thus to
improve their social well-being. Under his vigorous administration the
people were induced to build better houses, to pay more regard to suitable
and decent clothing, to prize more highly the benefits of education and of
industry, to realize better the way in which the Society, through its
missionaries, laboured for their welfare, and were thus enabled more
intelligently and more sympathetically to receive their teaching on
spiritual matters. That Dr. Philip fully recognized and acted upon the
conviction that Christianity is the true centre and source of civilization
is evident from his own testimony: -
'Vital religion has never been lost
sight of in my labours in South Africa; and though, like the sap which
nourishes the tree and gives it all its foliage and fruit. it is not
visible to the eye, it is nevertheless the source of all the fruitfulness
and beauty which adorn our missionary stations. While I am satisfied, from
abundance of incontrovertible facts, that permanent societies of
Christians can never be maintained among an uncivilized people without
imparting to them the arts and habits of civilized life, I am satisfied,
upon grounds no less evident, that if missionaries lose their religion and
sink into mere mechanics, the work of civilization and moral improvement
will speedily retrograde. The church at Bethelsdorp is not, perhaps, more
numerous than it was in 1821, but I believe it contains more real
Christians than on any former occasion .
In January, 1826, by the request of the
Directors, Dr. Philip returned to England in order to assist their
deliberations. Richard Miles, formerly pastor of Brigg in Lincolnshire,
who had been appointed to Demerara, was sent to Cape Town to act as Dr.
Philip's substitute during the latter's absence in England. Mr. Miles
visited the various stations, including Kafirland and Kuru man, and, after
Dr. Philip's return, early in 1830 returned to England, his connection
with the Society being terminated soon after.
While in England, in 1828, Dr. Philip
published his famous Researches ii South Africa, to which we have already
referred once and again. In a book covering so large an area, and dealing
with such bitterly controverted subjects, it was unlikely that slips and
errors would be entirely avoided. The book aroused in the Colony a
bitterness of feeling which illustrates further how deadly was the hatred
felt by many to any one who dared to defend the-native, and to question
either the justice or the wisdom of the actions of colonists towards them.
It was perhaps possible here and there to convict Dr. Philip of some
slight inaccuracy, and these were astutely used to divert attention from
the enormous mass of irrefutable testimony adduced in support of his main
contentions. An example of the hostility aroused by the book is the fact
that, soon after his return to Africa, Dr. Philip was sued for libel in
the Supreme Court of the Colony. The libel was based upon a passage which
Dr. Philip had quoted from Mr. Pringle, the secretary of the Anti-Slavery
Society. All efforts to transfer the trial to England, and thus remove it
from the intensely prejudiced and hostile atmosphere of Cape Town, were
overruled, the case was tried in the midst of local prejudice, and without
the benefit of a jury, and damages to the amount of £200 awarded against
Dr. Philip. The costs amounted to £1,000. These sums were immediately more
than met by the subscriptions and contributions of those in England, who
felt that Dr. Philip had fought a good fight in the cause of our common
humanity, and that he had been condemned only by one of those processes,
quite familiar to all who fight the battles of freedom, in which even the
forms and the power of law are used to punish the innocent and to shield
the guilty.
Notwithstanding the attacks upon Dr.
Philip, and the hostility shown in many ways against his book, it exerted
enormous influence upon the administration of affairs in the Colony. One
highly important result was the promulgation, on July 17, 1828, of the
famous Order in Council, No. 50, by Sir R. Bourke. This was entitled, 'An
Ordinance for Improving the Condition of Hottentots and other Free Persons
of Colour.' 'Previous to the promulgation of this humane provision, an
erroneous idea had become prevalent in the Colony that Hottentots, the
original proprietors of the soil, could not hold land. A principle so
atrocious, and a tenet so unfounded, therefore required some declaratory
enactment, and this was provided by the one in question. The 'principle so
atrocious' had often been acted upon, but from the date of Order No. 50,
plundering the Hottentot became less easy and more dangerous to those who
pursued it. Hence in many quarters, where this practice had been both
common and profitable, feeling ran high with regard to Dr. Philip. Those
who are curious on this point, and wishful to understand to what lengths
folly and prejudice can carry men, should read—if they can now find
copies—such publications as Some Reasons for our opposing the Author of
the South African Researches: By the British Immigrants of 1820.
In addition to whatever influence it
exerted in bringing about Order No. 50, Dr. Philip's book also gave a
great stimulus to the work of emancipation in Great Britain, and led
ultimately to the appointment by the House of Commons, in 1836, of a
Select Committee on the whole question of the relation of the British
Government to natives in her colonies and along their frontiers.
A Commission of Inquiry, which visited
many parts, had been appointed in 1824. The circulation of their report
among members of the House of Commons was delayed until 1830, but when it
appeared' it justified completely Dr. Philip's main contentions as to the
relations of the colonists towards the natives. It shows how evil, in
their influence upon Hottentots, were the proclamations of 1809, 1812, and
1819. The effect of the clause in the first, prohibiting Hottentots from
moving about without passes, is thus set forth :-
'The effect of this clause placed the
Hottentots under the control of every inhabitant of the Colony, and having
been enacted at a period when the demand for free labour was encouraged by
the prohibition to import slaves, the vigilance of those who were
interested in obtaining it was naturally excited in detaining the
Hottentots upon frivolous pretexts within the limits of their respective
districts. It has likewise been attended with inconvenience to the
inhabitants who employed them, especially in the neighbourhood of the
villages and markets, with which constant and frequent intercourse was to
be maintained.'
'The result of these regulations has
been that of creating perpetual obligation in the Hottentots to enter into
service; for although it was declared that, at the expiration of his
engagement, a Hottentot was free to make another, or to act in any manner
that the laws of the Colony admitted, yet in the event of his not making a
new engagement, he was liable to be apprehended as a vagrant, at the
expiration of the time mentioned in his pass, thrown in gaol, and a master
provided for him, who either advanced or became responsible for the
expenses of detention. The keepers of the different gaols, who were
allowed to have an interest in victualling the prisoners, and also a power
of apprehending vagrants in the towns, were not remiss in this part of
their duty.'
Whatever may have been the ulterior
views of Government, the system then acted upon has beeii unceasingly
pursued, but in some districts with more severity than in others, and with
the exception of the individuals of the Hottentot class who have found
asylums in the missionary institutions, or who have served in the Cape
Corps, the great majority have remained in a state of servitude to the
white inhabitants of the Colony. In reporting upon the civil and criminal
laws, my colleagues and myself had occasion to notice the insufficient
protection which the proclamation of 1809 had afforded to the Hottentots
against the undue severity of their masters, as well as the feelings which
had prevailed in the provincial and colonial courts whenever the claims of
the Hottentot servants to indemnity were balanced against the oppressive
authority of the masters. We had also to notice the increasing frequency
of the crimes committed by the Hottentots, and the prevalence of feelings
in the higher classes of the agricultural population, which precluded any
expectation of their consent to relax the system by which the condition of
the Hottentots might be ameliorated.'
The proclamations of 1812 and 1819
legalized the apprenticeship system, by which the Hottentots lost control
even of their own children. The report indicates the gross evils to which
this led, sketches the history of the missionary institutions, and finally
sums up the position in words which amply justify the action taken by the
Society's agents and supporters in the Colony and in Great Britain :-
'Much of the opposition that was shown
by the Dutch Government to the exertions of Dr. Van der Kemp arose from
the national jealousy of the sources from whence he derived his pecuniary
support, and of the friendly feelings which the Hottentots under his care
had always manifested towards the English Government. Allowing, however,
for the operation of those scruples at a particular period, it must be
admitted, that although the existence of the missions established by the
London Missionary Society has been tolerated by the local government, yet
no effort has been made by it to extend the sphere of their usefulness, or
to realize the benefits of which they undoubtedly were the willing
instruments. There has also been manifested a greater degree of sympathy
for the demands of the white inhabitants for the labour of the Hottentots,
than of respect for their rights as a free people, or of anxiety to
compensate for the many ifljuries they had suffered by encroachment on
their lands.'
'As the great sources of those evils of
which the missionary societies have complained have been removed by the
provisions of the Ordinance of Major-General Bourke, the
Lieutenant-Governor in Council, and by the confirmation which His Majesty
has been graciously pleased to give to it, I shall be excused from
entering into a detail of the advantages which this great measure may be
expected to accomplish. The Hottentots will now no longer be dependent
upon the caprices of the landdrosts for permission to repair to the
missionary institutions, or to engage in any place or in any employment
that is open to the choice of the free population of the Colony.'
In 1834, Sir Benjamin D'Urban reached
the Cape, and began a governorship fraught with highly important
consequences. He was charged by the Home Government to reduce
administrative expenditure, which up to this date had been upon an
outrageously excessive scale; to develop, as far as possible, legislative
and executive councils; and to carry out emancipation, Parliament having
enacted that slavery in Cape Colony should cease on December i, 1834.
Colonial opinion thought itself further outraged by the fact that
Parliament had allotted only Li ,o,000 as compensation for the 39,000
slaves affected by this Act, the slaveholders thinking they ought to
receive at least £3,000,000. But the most important part of Sir B.
D'Urbans duty was to place upon a better footing the relation between the
Government and the various frontier tribes. Before he could deal with the
eastern frontier, war had again broken out with the Kafirs. To illustrate
further the spirit in which anti-missionary writers see the events of this
time, we will tell the story of the next few years in Mr. Theal's words :-
'The arrangements made by Sir B. Durban
for the preservation of peace were such as every one approves of at the
present day. He brought some i8,000 Fingoes from beyond the Kei and gave
them ground between the Keiskarna and Fish rivers, where they would form a
buffer for the colonists. They and the Kosas' hated each other bitterly,
and this feeling was deepened by their appropriating and taking with them
22,000 head of cattle belonging to Kreli's people. It was thus to their
interest to act honestly towards the Europeans, whose support alone could
save them from destruction. Between the Keiskania and the Kei the western
Kosa clans were located as British subjects, but a great deal of authority
was left to the chiefs. The territory was named the Province of Queen
Adelaide, and Colonel Smith was stationed at a place in it called
King-Williamstown, to command the troops and control the chiefs. This plan
of settlement commended itself to the great majority of the colonists and
of the missionaries , who hoped that under it the Kosas would make rapid
advances towards civilization, and that property on the border would be
secure.
'There was, however, in Cape Town-500
miles from the Kaffir frontier--a party under the leadership of the
reverend Dr. Philip, that entirely disapproved of the Governor's plans. It
was composed of only a few individuals, but it had powerful support from
abroad. This party desired the formation of states ruled by Bantu chiefs I
under the guidance of missionaries, and from which Europeans not favoured
by missionaries should be excluded. It maintained the theory that the
Kosas were an eminently docile and peaceably disposed people, who could
easily be taught to do what was right, and who must therefore have been
provoked to take up arms by great wrongs and cruelties. The utmost fear
was expressed that the Bantu tribes would perish if exposed to free
intercourse with white people.
'To push his views, Dr. Philip visited
England with a Kosa and a half-breed Hottentot, who had been trained by
missionaries. A Committee of the House of Commons was at the time
collecting information upon the aborigines in British colonies, and Dr.
Philip appeared before it. His evidence was received at great length, and
though it consisted largely of opinion, it was allowed to outweigh that of
officers of greatest experience in South African affairs .'
Rightly to estimate this and other
kindred references, it must be borne in mind that Lord Gknelg's action was
based upon the report of the British Government's own Commission of
Inquiry referred to above. Further, in the four folio volumes which
contain the evidence given before, and the final report of, the Select
Committee of the House of Commons appointed in 1836, there is found the
amplest confirmation of the views and assertions of the Society's agents.
To believe that the modern historian's view is correct, is to believe that
half the witnesses before one of the most powerful and important of House
of Commons' Committees were either fools or knaves.
The powerful and warlike Kafir tribes
inhabited the country lying to the east and north of the Great Fish River.
Physically they were a fine race. The chiefs power was despotic. Polygamy
prevailed, and witchcraft, in which they all firmly believed, was the
source of constant evil and cruelty. At the close of the last century and
the beginning of this, constant warfare raged between the frontier
colonists and the Kafirs. 'The farmers were forced to league together for
mutual defence, and a system of commandoes was the result. Abuses, no
doubt, were frequently committed by these bands. These words entirely
concede the contention of Dr. Philip and his friends. The Katirs not
unfrequently robbed the colonists, who were warlike and savage in their
reprisals ; but the bulk of the responsibility for the horrible crimes and
slaughter which were perpetrated on both sides between 1820 and 1851 lies
largely at the door of those colonists who were hungering for the land and
the cattle of the Kaflrs. On the occasion of every fresh outbreak of
border violence it was easy to assert that the Kafirs were the aggressors.
But the modern reader notes that one constant result of each successive
outbreak was the enlargement of colonial territory and the concomitant
increase of Kafir subjugation. This was inevitable, but the evidence
favours the view that but for the presence of Christian missionaries in
South Africa, little or nothing would have been done on behalf of the
Kafir tribes, and their reduction to serfdom would have been much more
rapid and complete.
As early as 1815, Graham's Town had been
established as a frontier post in consequence of troubles with the Kafirs.
In 1817, Lord Charles Somerset made a treaty with Gaika and other Kafir
chiefs by which the kraal to which stolen cattle could be traced was
compelled to make reparation from its own stock. In 1818 a pretext was
found for violating this treaty. War broke out, and finally in 1819 Lord
Charles Somerset concluded an agreement with the Kafir chiefs 'that all
Kafirs should evacuate the country between the Great Fish River and the
Keiskamma. This region was to be a neutral territory. At this juncture the
British Parliament voted £50,000 towards an emigration scheme, which
resulted in the arrival in South Africa during 1820 of 4,000 emigrants,
selected out of 90,000 applicants'. These families were landed at Algoa
Bay (Port Elizabeth), and dispersed along the eastern frontier of the
Colony. By the end of 1820, about 5.000 settlers had been located between
the Sunday and Great Fish Rivers, and southward from Graham's Town to the
sea—that is over a territory of about 3.000 square miles. Like many
colonization schemes, this suffered at first from incompetency on the part
of many of the settlers, from failure of crops, and also from the
unconcealed hostility of Lord Charles Somerset. The settlers finally
Petitioned the Home Government for a commission of inquiry into their
grievances, largely on the ground that the interests of the western and
eastern branches of Cape Colony were by no means identical, and that the
ruling powers at Cape Town gave little heed to, and cared still less about
the requirements of the eastern half of the Colony. In July, 1824, Royal
Commissioners arrived at Graham's Town. Among other achievements, this
visit led in April, 1829, to the establishment of a free press in the
Colony, a fact very potent in after effects upon the controversy over
native rights. After the publication of the Report of the Commissioners in
September, 1826, the eastern province was made, in civil government,
independent of the western, under a Lieutenant-General residing at
Uitenhage. Many local reforms were instituted, old Dutch monopolies and
administrative methods disappeared, and in 1828 Captain Stockenstrom was
appointed Commissioner-General at Graaff Reinet to watch over the native
tribes of the frontier. Meanwhile, the Kafirs had been allowed to reoccupy
the 'neutral territory.' Macomo, son of Gaika, attacked the Tambookies
living on the Zwart Kei River, and then was deeply offended by the
highhanded action of the Colonial Government, which expelled him and his
people from the Kat River. At this point, in 1829, the famous Kat River
Settlement, which we shall describe later on, was established. The
'reprisal' system. which had been suppressed for some years, began to
revive.
In 1834, the first year of Sir B.
D'Urban's government, a vigorous attempt was made to resume the oppression
of the native races by the proposal of a new 'Ordinance for the Better
Suppression of Vagrancy in the Colony.' Dr. Philip, aided by other
missionaries, gave this proposal the most strenuous opposition, and while
it was under discussion the Kafir war again broke out. Here also, no
doubt, the Kafirs gave ample ground for misrepresenting their actions, and
for reviving the worst features of the commando system. It was natural
that savages should act as they did; it was not natural that men of a
Christian nation should act as many of the colonists did. The crimes of
the Kafirs were magnified, the outrages and crimes committed upon them by
the colonists were minified. In December, 1834, the Kafirs invaded the
Settlement, and by the close of the year were masters of the whole
district, except Graham's Town and Theopolis. In the war which ensued the
Kafirs were defeated, and Hintza, their most powerful chief, treacherously
murdered. Public opinion at home was deeply stirred. Largely through the
efforts of Dr. Philip, and other South African missionaries, the true
state of affairs along the frontier was apprehended by the public and by
Parliament, and in 1836 Lord Glenelg sent his famous dispatch to Cape
Town. In this state document, the Home Government accepted fully and acted
vigorously upon the view of native rights, of colonial aggression, and of
responsibility towards the natives which all the missionaries had so
strenuously advocated.
The furious hatred which this dispatch
aroused, the persistent efforts made to limit its effect, and to reverse
its action, taken in conjunction with the after history of the Colony, are
strong proofs of its justice, wisdom, and efficacy. The dispatch affirmed
that 'in the conduct which was pursued towards the Kafir nation by the
colonists, and the public authorities of the Colony, through a long series
of years, the Kafirs had ample justification of the late war; they had a
perfect right to hazard the experiment, however hopeless, of extorting by
force that redress they could not otherwise expect to obtain; and that the
claim of sovereignty over the new province bounded by the Keiskamma and
the Kei must be renounced. It rests upon a conquest resulting from a war
in which, as far as I am at present enabled to judge, the original justice
is on the side of the conquered, not of the victorious party.'
How colonial opinion viewed this policy
the following extract shows. Prior to the arrival of the dispatch rumours
had been current in Cape Town that the Home Government would not approve
of Sir Benjamin D'Urban's action. Speaking of this Wilmot and Chase say in
their history' :-
'The origin of the rumours preceding the
arrival of this cruel despatch may be found in the proceedings of a small
but active party in the South African metropolis, which commenced a
systematic crusade, under the guise of humanity, against the Government
and colonists. During the whole progress of hostilities that most
influential and talented public journal—the Sent/i African Advertiser,
printed in Cape Town—the editor of which had allied himself to the ultra
and not quite disinterested views of the Rev. Dr. Philip—employed its
utmost, and not very scrupulous endeavours in an unremitting series of
articles to prejudice the case of the Colony.'
'After such representations,
contradicted at the time by the frontier presses and one at Cape Town,
which were never heeded, it can be no matter of wonder that the home
authorities and the public were deceived, and this may account for the
despatch dictated by the peculiar bias of its author. But the delusion
still continued to be maintained by the industry, worthy of a better
cause, of the Cape Town Miss/u,: part,', and its tools on the extreme
frontier, who in order to deepen the impression, employed i/it asnle
device of exhibiting before the humane but too credulous masses of the
British people a living specimen of "oppressed friends and brothers".
The reader who, after the lapse of half
a century, is striving to arrive at the truth on this fiercely
controverted issue, will find it difficult to accept a view which the
historian, writing thirty years later, can enforce only by imputing
hypocrisy, self-interest, bias, and conscious deceit. to his opponents,
especially when these are men like Dr. Philip and Mr. Fairbairn, editor of
the South African Advertiser. To such it appears more reasonable and
likely that not a few colonists on the frontier were cruel and unjust
oppressors of the natives, doing these deeds of violence from intelligible
and obvious motives. They wished to enrich themselves easily and quickly.
they yielded to the temptation of 'land hunger,' they liked the excitement
of fighting the natives, and they considered it Utopian folly to even
attempt to benefit Hottentots and Kafirs. What the journalists and
historians who uphold the anti-missionary view have never yet succeeded in
showing is why, if they were either hypocrites or misguided and
self-seeking persons, Dr. Philip and his helpers should have cared to lift
a finger on behalf of Kafir and Hottentot, and how, if they were misguided
fools, they could have so long and so powerfully influenced public
opinion.
In December, 1839, the territory which
had been wrested from the Kafirs in 1834 and 1835 was restored, including
the portion between the Great Fish and Keiskamma Rivers; in the latter
part of 1836 Colonel Smith, the Commandant of the Province of Adelaide,
was tried for the murder of Hintza, and, in full accordance with colonial
precedent, acquitted; and in the House of Commons at the same time an Act
was passed 'for the prevention and punishment of offences committed by His
Majesty's subjects within certain territories adjacent to the Colony of
the Cape of Good Hope.' This Act was intended by Parliament to be a
restraint upon that system of outrage which invoked colonial law to punish
and rob natives, who in many cases were ignorant of the existence and
meaning of the laws they were supposed to have violated. On the other
hand, it was intended to prevent colonists guilty of crimes that were
detestable to common humanity from being able to crush those natives who
had sufficient knowledge of colonial law to make the attempt to secure
protection. Theoretically the law was impartial; actually, as it had been
constantly administered by the aggressive party, the weaker always went to
the wall. One result of the legislation of 1835 and 1836 was to induce
large numbers of Boers, no longer able to do exactly as they pleased with
Kafir and Hottentot, to begin those migrations which ultimately settled
the regions afterwards known as the Orange Free State and the Transvaal.
But legislation, even when on just,
humane, and righteous lines, could only begin the settlement of such
thorny difficulties as those connected with the Kafirs. The policy
advocated by Dr. Philip, especially in the later developments of 1846 and
1850, can only be fairly judged by never losing sight of the fact that
large numbers of colonists, all of whom had direct pecuniary interest in
the results of their actions, were instant in season and out of season in
both denouncing and in seeking to reverse it. Under these circumstances it
is more remarkable that those who cared for the souls of the natives
achieved the measure of success which attended their efforts, than that
they were not able steadily and progressively to enforce their views more
absolutely over the whole of South Africa.
Side by side with the powerful influence
exerted upon public opinion in Great Britain, and upon public
administration in Cape Colony, Dr. Philip steadily sustained work at the
various stations occupied when he reached Africa, and from time to time
added new names to the long list. The following facts outline the progress
made in direct and special missionary work during the stormy epoch of 1820
to 1850
1. PACALTSDORP. Soon after the death of
Charles Pacalt, its founder, on November 26, 1818, Mr. J. G. Messer took
charge of this station, and continued to labour there until the end of
1821. At this time there was an average attendance at the Sunday services
of about 300, and he also instituted a Sunday School for the instruction
of slaves, and of those who could attend only on that day. In January,
1822, the superintendence passed into the hands of Mr. William Anderson,
the veteran Griqua Town missionary, who brought to the task the ripe
experience of over twenty years spent in close contact with South African
natives. Mr. Pacalt had left all his property, in value about £300, to be
used for the support of Christian work at his own greatly loved station.
This money was chiefly devoted to the building of a suitable place for
public worship, which was opened in June, 1825. Mr. Anderson continued in
charge of Pacaltsdorp until his retirement from active service in 1848. He
died at Pacaltsdorp on September 24, 1852. He had passed forty-seven years
in active service. He was one of the pioneers in one of the hardest of
African fields, and one of the most successful of Christian workers.
During his twenty-seven years as superintendent at Pacaltsdorp he was
assisted by a succession of active educational workers, such as Mr. Rogers
Edwards, afterwards of Lattakoo, Mr. Thomas Edwards, and Mr. Hood. The
history of Pacaltsdorp is one of the most satisfactory on the Society's
book. The founder transformed the moral and spiritual wilderness into a
garden and died there while Anderson spent the last twenty-six years of
his active life there, most of his family actively co-operating with him
in evangelical and educational work. For many years Pacaltsdorp came
nearest to the ideal of the founders of the Society as to what a station
should be. Begun in prayer and self-sacrifice, it became at once a haven
of refuge for the downtrodden and oppressed; it uplifted and instructed
the degraded, forlorn, and ignorant slaves and Hottentots; the first
workers linked their lives inseparably to its interests, and very many
proofs were granted to them of the transforming and renewing power of the
Gospel. 'Pacaltsdorp,' said a visitor in 1831, 'is one of those places on
which the eyes look, and the thoughts dwell with peculiar feelings and
associations. . . . Comparing what the place was when the mission was
established with what it now is, it may well be said, "What hath God
wrought'.
2. THEOPOLTS, sixty miles north-east of
Bethelsdorp, was begun in 1814 by a number of Hottentots from Bethelsdorp
under the care of G. Ullbricht and J. Bartlett, upon land granted for the
purpose by the then governor, Sir John Cradock. The former died in 1821,
and the station passed into the care of Mr. George Barker. The methods of
work and conditions of life were similar to those at Bethclsdorp. The land
belonged to the station, and formed the one secure spot for Hottentots in
all that region. A Christian church was constituted, and many became
members by profession of love, trust in, and loyalty to Jesus Christ. In
1827 the work had progressed so as to require a new church capable of
seating 800 or 900 persons. In 1829 about 100 families removed to the
'Neutral Territory.' In 1830 Mr. Christopher Sass became Mr. Barker's
colleague. and in 1839 the latter removed to Paarl. Mr. Sass, who like
William Anderson was an Orange River veteran, remained at Theopolis until
his death in 1849. At this station also educational work was vigorously
prosecuted. Being beyond the limits of the old colony and on the border of
the Kafir territory, Theopolis suffered severely from the Kafir wars.
3. GRAHAM'S Town, twenty-six miles from
Theopolis, and seventy from Bcthclsclorp, was founded as a centre of trade
and a military post for the district of Albany, as it was then called. The
missionaries at once recognized the importance of the post, and mission
work was begun there in 1827 by Mr. John Monro, and continued by him for
the next eleven years. He ministered both to colonists and natives, the
latter consisting of Hottentots, Kalirs, Mantatecs, and other tribes.
4. HANKEY. This station, so prominent in
the story of South African missions, consisting of a tract of land
stretching along both sides of the Gamtoos River, and situated about sixty
miles from Bcthclsdorp, was purchased for £1,500 in 1822. It was designed
as an outlet for the surplus population, and consisted partly of pasture
land, and partly of land which by irrigation could be made fertile and
fruitful. About too residents of Bethelsdorp co-operated with the Society
in the purchase, and supplied £500 of the purchase money. The extent of
the station was 4,100 acres. The first European worker was J. G. Messer,
who superintended the station from 1823 to 1831. He was assisted by Mr.
William Foster, who was sent there in 1826 to establish a school for the
children of missionaries, like the South Sea Academy described on pp. 296,
297, and to superintend educational work. In this project Mr. Foster was
unsuccessful, and after a very brief spell of service returned to England
in 1829, and ceased in 1830 to be connected with the Society. Mr. Messer
was succeeded by Mr. John Melvill, who laboured there till 1838. Mr.
Edward Williams carried on the work till 1842, in which year William
Philip, son of Dr. Philip, took charge of the station. He greatly improved
it by carrying out successfully the great engineering feat of cutting a
tunnel through a mountain, thus utilizing the water of the Gamtoos to
irrigate part of the valley. This cost £2,300, of which the Society gave
£500, the rest being raised from the rental of the land. In July, 1845,
Mr. Philip was drowned in the Gamtoos River, and was succeeded by his
brother, T. Durant Philip, who remained in charge of the station until
1876.
5. KAT RIVER SETTLEMENT. Next to
Bethelsdorp itself this station became the object of most bitter and
envenomed attack. To this the site chosen, the date of formation, and the
influence which the settlement began to exert all contributed. The Kat
River formed in 1820 the western boundary of Katirland. It is about
200miles north-cast of Bcthelsdorp. That earnest and devoted missionary,
Joseph Williams, who in 18 16 attempted to found a mission in this region,
died in 18i8, and for a time the enterprise failed. In 1829 the Colonial
Government authorized Captain A. Stockcnström, then commissioner-general
on the eastern frontier, to execute a plan which he himself proposed. This
was to form a strong Hottentot settlement in the 'Neutral Territory.' The
spot chosen was a tract of wild country, surrounded by mountains whence
the streams flow which form the Kat River. The original idea was to limit
the selection of Hottentots to those who by character and intelligence
were likely to make good settlers. But so great was the inrush of
Hottentots, as soon as the project became known, that this principle of
selection could not be maintained. The first location consisted of 250
men, capable of sell-defence should they be attacked by Kafirs. This was
in J829, and in the same year ioo Hottentot families came from Theopolis,
and forty from Bethelsdorp, bringing with them their cattle and farming
implements. The plan of settlement followed on this occasion was one not
unfrequently imitated in later times.
'The plan adopted in the distribution of
the land was to divide the whole tract into locations of from 4,000 to
6,000 acres each; to plant in each location one, two, or more villages, as
eligible situations were found for irrigation; to divide the arable land
into allotments of from four to six acres, of which every family capable
of cultivating it received one, while additional lots were reserved for
such as should distinguish themselves by superior industry, or by their
exertions in maintaining good order, or who after probation should be able
to show that they possessed ample means for the profitable occupation of
more land. The pastureland was reserved for commonage to each location.
The conditions to grantees were, to build a cottage, to enclose the arable
ground, and to bring it under proper cultivation within five years; at the
expiration of which, the conditions being fulfilled, the property was to
be granted in freehold; but if these conditions were neglected the
allotment to revert to the Government. Each holder to have a right to keep
live stock in proportion to extent of arable land and the capabilities of
pasturage.'
At first the Kafirs were hostile, but at
length Makomo and other chiefs became friendly with the settlers, and soon
the settlement had a Hottentot population of 4,000. The Government
appointed a minister to look after the religious interests of the people.
Mr. Thompson and the Hottentots from the missionary institutions requested
Mr. James Read from Bethelsdorp to become their minister. Mr. Read,
Vanderkemp's colleague, was at this time the Society's senior missionary
in South Africa, he having already spent twenty-nine years in its service.
The village which formed the centre of mission work was called Philipton1
and there the congregation at public worship on Sunday amounted to about
i,000. From Philipton natives visited as local preachers the surrounding
districts, especially Buxton and Wilberforce. As the locations were widely
scattered educational work was difficult. At Philipton Mr. Read's son—Mr.
James Read, junior—superintended the day school, and the infant school was
taught by one of the missionary's daughters. In the various villages the
best educated of the Hottentots were appointed teachers.
In 1835, by order of Colonel Smith, Mr.
Read went to Graham's Town, and was not allowed to return to Philipton. He
visited England in 1836, and gave evidence before the House of Commons
Committee on the treatment of native races, and in 1838 returned to Kat
River. There he laboured until the abandonment and destruction of the
settlement in the Kafir War of 1851.
6. KAFFRARIA. In 1826, at the suggestion
of Dr. Philip, Mr. John Brownlee recommenced mission work in this great
district. He had reached Cape Town in 1817, and after a short period of
work at Somerset Farm, while attempting to establish a mission on the
Chumie River. he became at the close of 1818 a Government agent, and
resigned his connection with the Society. Seven years later Dr. Philip
invited him to resume work as a missionary, and in January, 1826, with Jan
Tzatzoe as his helper, he went to Buffalo River. There he began his new
labours on the spot which is now King William's Town. The kraal of
Tzatzoe's father was here, and the missionary was heartily welcomed by the
old chief. In 1827 he was joined by Mr. and Mrs. Kayser of Halle, who left
him in 1833 to found a new station on the Keiskamma River, and in 1836 Mr.
Kayser went to Knapp's Hope, with which station he was identified till his
death in 1859. Brownlee, amid all the vicissitudes through which the
district passed between 1834 and 1851, kept steadily at work in King
William's Town and the district, until in 1867 he retired from active
service. Both he and his wife died there in 1871. From Tzatzoe's kraal as
a centre evangelistic work in the early days of the mission was done over
a wide area, Mr. Kayser and young Jan Tzatzoe visiting large numbers of
Kafir kraals. The New Testament was translated into Kafir by Mr. Brownlee
and Mr. Kayser.
We have already traced the early Kafir
wars, the legislation of 1836, and the intensely hostile spirit in which
this was received. With the change of Government in England came a change
of colonial policy. It was not, happily for the natives of South Africa,
possible to entirely reverse Lord Glenelgs policy, but all that could be
attempted in that direction was done by the Colonial Government at Cape
Town. In 1846 war again broke out with the Kafirs, resulting in the formal
annexation of Kaifraria. As the Wesleyan Society began to throw so much
energy into their mission work in Kafiraria the London Missionary Society
was able to gradually withdraw from the stations it had occupied there,
and concentrate its efforts upon Bechwanaland and Matabeleland.
7. CALEDON INSTITUTION. This station was
for a time thrown into confusion by the evil conduct of John Seidenladen.
He was placed in charge of the station in i8; i. In 1819 Dr. Philip found
his work so neglected, and his character so deteriorated, that he removed
him. But the Government refused to allow a successor to be appointed, and
it was only by the most strenuous exertions that Dr. Philip averted the
destruction of the station. For about six years all regular mission work
was suspended, but in 187 Mr. Henry Helm, who had already completed
sixteen years work at Kok's Kraal, Bethesda, Griqua Town, and Bethelsdorp,
re-opened the institution. Mr. Helm was the first member in the African
field of a family which has rendered yeoman service in the century's task
of evangelizing Africa. In 1835 Daniel J. Helm, son of Henry, was
appointed to co-operate in this work with his father, who died in 1848.
Daniel then conducted the affairs of the institution satisfactorily until
about 1859, when the station became self- supporting. He died there in
1873.
8. The other stations, which during this
period continued cesitres of missionary activity, were Paarl, Tulbagh, L)ysselsdorp,
Port Elizabeth, Uitenhagc, Graaff Reinet, Colesberg, Somerset, Cradock,
and Fort Beaufort.
At these centres the work proceeded,
successfully at some, unsuccessfully at others, and with varying
retrogression and progression at others. Between 1840 and 1850, the
financial position of the Society led the Directors to urge upon the
churches within the Colony the view that the time had come for them to
relieve the home organization of any further expenditure. This appeal and
its consequences we will trace in the next chapter.
After twenty seven years of active and
resourceful labour, Dr. Philip was beginning to feel severely the combined
pressure of advancing years and of personal sorrows. After the sad and
sudden death, in 1845, of his son William, the doctor sent to the
Directors his resignation, and only at their most earnest request withdrew
it for a time. In 1844 Mr. J. C. Brown had arrived from England to take
charge of Union Chapel, Cape Town, but did not afford Dr. Philip the
relief he had looked for, since he relinquished work there at the close of
1847. Then Mr. Elliott, of Barrack Street Chapel, for a while undertook
the duties at Union Chapel. On October 23, 1847, Mrs. Philip died. She was
in many ways a remarkable woman. In addition to all the work falling
within her legitimate sphere, from a very early date she entirely relieved
Dr. Philip of all correspondence with the Directors on the details of
finance. She kept all the extensive and complicated accounts of the South
African Mission, and was a business-like woman of a very unusual type.
Notwithstanding most urgent appeals from Dr. Philip, for reasons soon to
appear, no competent successor was appointed. He paid a long visit to
Hankey, and, owing partly to his increasing weakness, and partly to Mrs.
Philip's death, the affairs of the mission generally began to fall into
confusion. On July 18, 1848, he wrote home, 'I beg you to recollect that I
am working in the service of the Society with one foot in the grave and
the other in heaven.' Just at this time the controversy, long maintained,
commenced on the question of leaving the stations within the Colony to
support themselves, the Society using its funds and resources only to
forward the work of the Gospel among the l3cchwanas, and to carry it to
tribes and regions yet unvisited. Had Dr. Philip been twenty years
younger, he would undoubtedly have exerted a powerful controlling
influence over a discussion which served only, so far as he was concerned,
to disturb the closing months of his life. At length the right successor
to Dr. Philip appeared in the person of the Rev. William Thompson. who had
spent the years 1837 to 1840, and .1841 to 1848, in mission work at
Bellary, in South India. He accepted the pastorate of Union Chapel, Cape
Town, where he began work in June, i 80. lie thus ceased to be on the
Society's staff as a missionary, but he was also appointed, in succession
to Dr. Philip, Agent at Cape Town for the South African missions of the
Society. By him the affairs of the missions in the Colony were directed
with great devotion, wisdom, and success, during the stormy and
troublesome period of the twenty-five years from 1850 to 1873. Dr. Philip
died at Hankey, August 27, 1831.
The death of Dr. Philip closed a life
that will ever be memorable in South Africa. When he first set foot on its
soil in 1819, the Hottentots and other native tribes in and near Cape
Colony had practically no rights, and were in a worse position than the
slaves. When he died in 1851 largely as the result of his own clear, wise,
bold, and persistent efforts, the liberties they now enjoy were secured
and rendered permanent. When he took up the reins in 1819, the affairs of
almost every station needed the most careful attention. He brought order
out of chaos, he imparted the impulse of his own vigorous personality to
those who lacked a stimulus, he consolidated and developed mission work,
notwithstanding the weakness caused by the folly of some of its friends,
and the hindrances thrown in its path by those whose bitter hatred nothing
could remove. His rule was not always wholly acceptable to those who came
within its scope, but it was always the rule of a strong man, of one who
loved the truth, who fought for freedom, and who was as ready to resist
injustice in the highest places as he was to stretch out the hand of
brotherly help to the lowest and most degraded savage or slave. Although
in the twenty-seven years he fought many a sturdy conflict, he was not
quick to enter into a struggle, but being in he bore himself so that those
who opposed him were likely to remember his prowess. On the foundation
laid by Vanderkemp he raised strong and fair the structure of human
freedom.
Dr. Philip's departure was closely
preceded by the death of a good comrade in arms and a veteran in service,
and still more closely succeeded by another. In 1848 James Kitchingman
died; in 18 James Read. it was to Kitchingman that Dr. Philip turned when
in 1821 he was striving to infuse new life and hope into the discouraged
and despondent dwellers at Bethclsdorp. There he toiled with success from
1821 to 1826, and again from 1832 to the close of his active service.
James Read's name has appeared constantly in this narrative and his life
story covers the whole of the first half-century. His work had been done
in what Mr. Thompson calls, in the letter dated May 29, 1852, announcing
his decease, 'the high places of the field. With Vanderkemp he founded
Bethelsdorp, and after the doctor's death he carried on that work. With
Campbell he made the memorable first journey to Lattakoo, and later on he
began the Lattakoo Mission. Though for a time the object of bitter
calumny, lie lived patiently through the season of cloud and darkness. He
was the central missionary influence in the Kat River Settlement. So eager
was he to influence the natives to whom he had consecrated his life, that
he chose a despised Hottentot for his own wife, allying himself with her
in the hope that he might thus gain greater influence for good. Thus his
African service of fifty years passed in 'the very seat of missionary
warfare.' 'Few men,' wrote Mr. Thompson, 'have been assailed to the degree
he was when in the prosecution of his self-denying labours, few have been
less vulnerable than he, and there have been few men whose characters have
risen more triumphant than his over the misconception and worse malice and
misrepresentation of unthinking or wicked men.
|