by Judith Lloyd,
President of the Scottish District Families Association
I've had some remarks on my
first article. A couple were from lowland Clan members, one of whom
mentioned that when they think of lowlanders they immediately think of
clans, but that he would concede the fact that not all Scots were members
of nor associated with clans. For those of you who are part of the Lowland
Clans, I welcome any information on your clan if you would like it
incorporated into this column. We started this to give you and others a
chance to let others know about those Scots who did not live in the
Highlands.
The first people known as
the Scots (those who came from Ireland and other areas) were actually
Lowlanders. The Picts were mainly in the upper portion of Scotland.
Kenneth MacAlpine, combined some of the area settled above the Firth of
Forth and the area of the Clyde by the Picts with the lowland areas
settled by the Scots to create his Kingdom of Alba. This essentially made
him the "first" Scottish king. He ruled from Scone (in the district of
Perthshire just above the River Tay) and during his reign divided his
kingdom into districts, many of which remain today. Later in history the
inauguration of Alexander II at Scone was witnessed by the Earls of
Strathearn, Buchan, Angus, Fife, Menteith, Atholl and Lothian. These are
all districts and cities today. During and after William the Conquerer
defeated England many of the English nobles fled into lower Scotland. Some
of these stayed even after it was safe to return to England.
In the Highlands there were
no close villages like those that were found all over the lowlands. It
also was much harder to travel about in the highlands than in the
lowlands. It is only 12 miles between the southwestern shores of Scotland
and Ireland, making it very easy to row or sail back and forth between the
two countries. All of these factors combined to create in the Lowlander a
Scot with language, dress, and customs more like those of England than the
inhabitants of the northern mountains of Scotland who remained relatively
isolated, mostly Gaelic speaking, and considered to be heathens by the
people of the Lowlands. This attitude existed even in the time of William
Wallace whose birth status influenced the support of nobles for his fight.
Today there is a complete turn around. It is the Highlander descendants
who are in high regard and the Lowlander descendants who must "prove" that
they too are as Scottish as the Highlanders.
When I say that the Scots
in the lowlands were more like the English in culture that is not to say
that they were very like the English. Scots usually had much more
association with the peoples of Europe than they did England. They never
warred with anyone except England (and themselves). England, of course,
could not say the same. It seems they fought with almost everyone at some
point in their history. When the Scots needed assistance they were often
backed by European countries, especially France. So though the Lowlanders
were more like the English than the Highlanders they were truly more
European than English. The Norman, Angles, and Saxon had a great influence
on the early Lowlanders and made their language even more "English". The
language of the Lowlanders, Scot, was actually called Inglis by some.
In another dichotomy the
nobles and especially people of the Lowlands with any moneys would not
have worn wool since it was the cloth of the poor. They would have more
likely dressed as the European and English dressed. You can see this in
the early portraits done of Scots. Since the mid 1700's however the
wearing of the kilt by even the nobles of Scotland (and England, for that
matter) is considered very fashionable. However, one of my friends who
spends much time in Scotland once said if you see someone in a kilt in
Scotland, he is more likely to be an American than a Scot. And in another
turn the wool kilt is far more expensive than one of cotton or synthetic
material.
Today the Highlander is
much more intriguing to people with their history of warring, ability to
survive in the harsh environment of the Highland mountains, the image of
men fighting in tartan, and, of course the movies The Highlander, Rob Roy,
and Braveheart. As "we" Lowlander and district descendants make the world
more aware of us and our ancestors' contributions to Scotland we will see
less often the crestfallen face of someone inquiring on the origin of
their name and finding it is not associated with a Highland Clan, but
instead is associated with a Lowland Clan, or "worse still" a district or
city in Scotland and no clan association at all. |