Immortal Memory at the Atlanta Burns Club
(Editor’s note: One of the greatest honors a
member of a Burns Club can have bestowed on him or her is to be
asked to deliver
The Immortal
Memory
on Burns Night. Such was the case for me on the night of
January 28, 2006 at the Atlanta Burns Club in Atlanta, Georgia.
My deepest thanks to Vice President Victor Gregg, now serving as
President of the club, for his kind invitation.
The program was long but interesting, and the toasts
offered were some of the best I’ve ever heard. Even the haggis
was exceptional! The Atlanta Burns Club has the only replica in
the world built to the exact measurements of the Alloway
birthplace of Robert Burns.
I stood to deliver my speech around 10:00 p.m. and,
even at that late hour, found the packed building to be an alert
and attentive audience. It was a wonderful experience for me,
and I will always be appreciative of that signal honor and of
the opportunity to speak to my fellow members, who were gracious
and kind with their comments.)
The Immortal Memory
The Atlanta Burns Club
January 28, 2006
10:00 p.m.
WHO ARE YOU, MR. BURNS?
By Frank R. Shaw, FSA Scot, Atlanta, GA, USA, email:
jurascot@earthlink.net

Bronze bust of Robert Burns in
library of Susan and Frank Shaw

Atlanta Burns Cottage, January 3,
2002
Photographs by Frank Shaw
Introduction:
It is not my intention to tell you
the story that has been told thousands of time. But, I will
share some thoughts of mine, and several anecdotes as well, and
some quotes from various sources by and about out Bard.
It is said by some detractors that
Burns is more praised than read.(1)
Some charge that Burns is the most recited poet by drunken men.(2)
They maintain that most Burns gatherings are solely for the
purpose of meeting to eat and drink and are similar in nature to
those who show up for church once a year at Easter.
Hugh MacDiarmid, a/k/a Christopher
Muray Grieve, once said, “To create the kind of Scotland that
Burns worked for, he (Burns) would have to be forgotten for a
quarter of a century.”(3)
This is the same poet who said he would sacrifice a million
people any day for one immortal lyric.”(4)
It was MacDiarmid that espoused the “Not Burns - Back to Dunbar”(5)
and he continued saying it for years. Some have said MacDiarmid
was saying that attention should be paid to all Scottish poets,
not just Burns. Well, all he had to do was say so!
MacDiarmid is reputed by many to be
the greatest Scottish poet since Burns. And, in his own way, he
had a much harder time of it than Burns. Trained as a
schoolteacher, he was expelled for stealing books. He later
caught on with the Edinburgh Evening News and,
regrettably, was fired for selling books he had been given to
review.
His difficulties continued
throughout his life, and he even became a card-carrying
Communist. I have it on good report that he wore bright red ties
as if to provoke comments about his communist feelings. Another
tragedy in his life was the loss of his wife and two children to
a coal merchant. MacDiarmid ended up in London where he fell off
the top of a double-decker bus, landed on his head, causing much
difficulty with headaches, and was lucky to survive. Later on he
suffered a serious nervous breakdown.
Yet, he seemed to always come out of
whatever trouble he was in, and he continued to write poetry,
some of it even great poetry. There was a mellowing towards
Burns Clubs and Burns Nights on the part of MacDiarmid, and
during the Burns Bicentenary, he delivered The Immortal Memory
from Edinburgh for BBC, saying lots of good things about Burns.
You can make that kind of turn-around when you are considered
the best poet in Scotland since Burns.(6)
Who are you, Mr. Burns?
Allow me to quote a piece about
Burns in 1786:
“Who are you, Mr. Burns? At what
university have you been educated? What authors have you
studied? Who has praised your poems, and under whose patronage
are they published? In short, what qualifications entitle you to
instruct or entertain us?”(7)
It is believed these words come from James Sibbald, owner
and editor of the Edinburgh Magazine.
So, with all due respect
to the publisher, we will ask, “Who are you, Mr. Burns?” Carol
McGuirk, noted Burns scholar, succinctly says, “Robert Burns is
the only great poet ever to emerge from the British peasant
class.”(8)
Yet, he must have done something right since 10,000 people lined
the streets of Dumfries for his funeral. I’ve even seen
estimates of 12,000 people attending. But, before we get too
carried away with the fact that so many people attended the good
Bard’s funeral, let’s remember that just last month, the Belfast
authorities were estimating that a crowd of 500,000 was expected
for the funeral of the footballer, George Best!(9)
“Yes, who are you Mr. Burns?” to
have libraries with 5,000 or more books on or about you like the
Mitchell in Glasgow and the Thomas Cooper in Columbia, SC
that houses the Ross Roy Collection.
What do we call you, Mr.
Burns?
Your dear friend, William Nicol,
that gifted and irascible Latin teacher you once named a son
after, addressed you in a letter as “Dear Christless Bobie”. I
believe it is the only time that anyone ever called you
“Bobbie”. Help me, Mr. Burns. What do we call you? Some of your
friends called you “Robert” or “Robbie”. Others maybe a little
closer to you called you various names like “Rob”, “Rab”, “Rabbie”,
or “Robin”. Some today get upset if anyone ever dares call him “Bobie”.
However, and more interesting, nothing that I can find has ever
been said or written about Nicol calling him “Christless”.(10)
Burns had another detractor or
critic during his lifetime named James Paisely, who in 1788
published a book entitled Animadversions of Some Poets and
Poetasters of the Present Age, Especially R____B____.
Paisely wasted no time in calling Burns “an infidel poet” and “a
champion of Satan”.(11)
Funny, the only reason Paisley is remembered today is because
there was a Robert Burns for him to attack. Some people think
they can only turn their lights brighter by dimming the lights
of someone else. This is an excellent case!
Even those who should have known
better took shots at Burns.
In 1956, at the St. Louis Burns
Club, noted for publishing the Immortal Memory of their guest
speakers, Michael Gerard said: “One of the dullest and mosy
unsympathetic accounts of Burns was written by a fellow Scott,
Robert Louis Stevenson, and the reason for his failure may be
found in his confession. “I made a kind of chronological table
of his (Burns) various loves and lusts, and have been
comparatively speechless ever since’”.(12)
Whatever the sins of Mr. Burns, and
God knows there were many, of which he acknowledged, I find the
statement by Stevenson somewhat hypocritical since this is the
same man who pursued a married woman half way round the world.
Stevenson did publish an article on
Burns in 1879 that became widely known. What a lot of people do
not know, however, is that in 1875 he wrote an article for the
Ninth Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica that the editors
rejected. Interestingly, it was turned down because the essay
conveyed a “view of the poet that was too critical of Burns” and
was “not in accordance with the accepted Scotch tradition.” The
earlier article has haunted Stevenson even until this day.
Writing in the 1947 issue of
The Burns Chronicle, A. Angus says, “Stevenson’s lack of
charity in dealing with Burns had its own retribution as it
turned many of his country against him. To some extent it may be
responsible for the opposition that arose to the proposal for a
memorial to him after his death.”(13)
I have been all over Scotland and
never seen a statue of Stevenson, but I have seen many of Burns
and a few of Sir Walter Scott. I am aware of some statues of the
characters from the books of Stevenson being unveiled in the
recent past, and I’ve been made aware of the statue of Stevenson
in San Francisco. Recently I learned of the Robert Louis
Stevenson Edinburgh Club, and their feeling is that “the
question of a statue is complicated and sensitive” in that a
“lobby feels he did not approve of statues”. Instead, there is a
memorial to Stevenson to help children with respiratory
problems, which in my book is most commendable! There is a most
worthy book entitled The Edinburgh Literary Companion
by Andrew Lownie that tells of Stevenson being honored in the
Princes Street Gardens. “The gardens have several literary
memorials including one to Robert Louis Stevenson - A Grove of
Birch Trees Designed by Ian Hamilton Findlay, artist and poet”.(14)
I do not want to sound uncharitable
to Stevenson. I read him and currently have 65 books on or about
him in my library. Factual matters can be shared or stated and
still accept the scholarship and genius of Stevenson. One of the
complaints about some Burnsians and Burns Clubs is they gloss
over the shortcomings of Burns. I do not. I accept him as the
person he was in life, poetry, and song. I will do the same with
any writer or poet, including Stevenson.
Another writer who should have known
better was Principal Sharp who wrote about Burns in a less than
flattering manner. Two quick references suffice at this time.
First, of Holy Willie’s Prayer, Sharp said, “Those who
have loved most what was best in Burns’s poetry must have
regretted that it was ever written.” Secondly, Sharp says of the
Jolly Beggars that it is “strange not to say
pitiful”…“that the same hand which wrote the Cotter’s
Saturday Night should have stooped to write the Jolly
Beggars.”(15)
Burns, once again, had his
detractors during his lifetime, but he never let that bother
him. He has had detractors many times since his untimely death
in 1796. Yet, I know of no poet or writer that is lionized today
with meetings in their honor like those of Burns, and I am not
just talking of the January 25th Annual Burns Night Dinners. For
example, our own Atlanta Burns Club, founded in 1896, meets the
first Monday of each month, rain or shine!
What are you to others, Mr. Burns?
Let’s look at two men who were book
collectors. Carl Sandburg tells us in his Lincoln
Collector they were Oliver Barret, the great book collector,
and Charles Gunther, a candy manufacturer and book collector.
This is not only a classic portraiture of book collectors, but
it is a story about Burns’ writing. Barrett saw a manuscript in
the handwriting of Robert Burns and they were the verses to
Auld Lang Syne. The conversation goes something like this:
Barrett: “I want this ‘Auld Lang
Syne’.”
Gunther: “I know how you feel. I
went over to England and I got it and I had to pay a lot of
money for it.”
Barrett: “I want it now. You know
how it feels to have it, and I don’t know how it
feels.”
Gunther: “I will sell you this ‘Auld
Lang Syne’ and you write out the receipt that any time I want
it, I can buy it back at the same price.” Barrett took it home.
A week later Gunther was on the
phone saying:
“Bring back the ‘Auld Lang Syne.’
You know, I haven’t been able to sleep. I
hear the waves of Lake Michigan pounding at night and I think
about it, and
now it is gone and I am not going to last many years. Let me
have it back”.(16)
What do you think of when you think
of Burns?
When you think of Burns, what comes
to mind? Is it his love for whisky? Women? Mankind? Poetry?
Children, both in and out of wedlock? For me, I will narrow it
down to one word. PASSION. Burns had passion. Passion for all he
did in life, particularly for his poems, songs, wife, country,
whisky, children, women, fellow-an and his fellow Masons. Plain
and simple, Burns was a passionate man. Without passion he would
not have been the Robert Burns we know.
It is said that long ago the Greeks
did not write obituaries. They asked only one question: “Did he
have passion”? It was with passion that Burns defied his father
to attend the dancing hall that caused a breech between the two
that even death could not remove. Rab was a rebel with a cause
and he had a rebellious streak a mile wide.
It was with passion that Burns wrote
poetry about his heroes - Wallace, Bruce and the Stuarts. It was
with passion that he would stand up for his beliefs. It was with
passion that Burns displayed a defiant spirit as evidenced early
in life with his long hair in a knot. He was a man of passion
for his fellowman and could write:
“While we sing, God save the king,
We’ll nae forget the people.”
He was called by many a “people’s
poet”. He was very much a social person enjoying the
company of men and women. In the Border and Highland trips he
recorded, it is evident that a most important aspect of his
trips was the enjoyment of meeting the people.
Two of his characteristics
standout for me.
First, the fierce love of his native
land. This seems to be every native son’s dominant
characteristic. I’ve never met a Scotsman who did not express
great love for his “auld country”. Look around you tonight at
Eddie Morgan or Billy Hutton, and you will find their native
land is a common characteristic among them.
Secondly, his love of freedom stands
out. If there ever was a man who hated tyranny or hated
oppression of any kind, that man was Robert Burns. He wrote of
independence for both France and America.
Regarding the American Congress of
1776, Burns wrote, “that the fourth of July will be as famous to
their posterity as the fifth of November”. That will send you
running to your history books to find out I am talking about Guy
Fawkes Day, which is celebrated with fireworks and bonfires.
This was a misguided attempt to kill the king and Parliament
with a huge explosion to rid the country of its Protestant
rulers and restore the Catholic faith. But, the big difference
between the two celebrations is we celebrate victory and they
celebrate failure.
Once at a banquet Burns was asked to
drink to the health of Prime Minister Pitt. He replied, “I will
give you a better toast - George Washington.” Coupled with other
things that he had said, done or written, whispers abounded that
he was a traitor. How dare they say the author of “Scots Wha Hae
with Wallace Bled” is a traitor!
My Personal Pilgrimage
I began my Scottish pilgrimage or
quest about 15 or years ago, late in life sadly. But, once I
found out about my Scottish heritage that comes from the lovely
Isle of Jura, once I found out that Scottish blood courses
through my veins, I have gone full speed. However, that is
nothing new for me because I have always considered myself an
average man, and I have had to run hard all my life to catch up
with whatever dream I was chasing or whatever devil I was
fleeing!
One of my passions is books. When I
began my Scottish journey, I bought books on or about Scotland.
I bought all kinds of Scottish books. I devoured many of them
and wanted the rest for future research and study. After all
that is what a library is for. Today there are 3,000 Scottish
books in my home. When I fell in love with Burns, and that is
what I did unashamedly, I bought books on Burns and devoured a
lot of them. Today there is a room adjacent to my library/office
that is the Burns Room and contains over 900 books on or
about Burns.
Not satisfied with just reading
about Scotland and Burns, Susan and I have been to Scotland time
after time, totaling 15 trips. We went to see for ourselves the
things we read about. We have owned land in Scotland and still
have a wee patch. More importantly, we have friends in Scotland,
and we do more than swap Christmas cards. They add meaning to
our Scottish quest. Their joy as well as their pain is ours. I
have brought or had shipped back to Atlanta more Scottish books
than the law should allow. Scotland is our Auld Country, too.
I’ve stood in the room where Burns
died wondering about this man of the people, this “People Poet”
and could only ask as others have before me…
Can you imagine Scotland without
Burns?
Can you imagine Burns without
passion?
Conclusion:
I
want to thank my dear friend Beth Gay, Editor of The
Family Tree, which is found on
www.electricscotland.com, for sharing this illustration with
me. There is an old Mexican tradition concerning death that says
you die three times:
Once - when you cease to breathe
Once - when you are buried
Once - when your name is never spoken or mentioned again on
earth
That is to say, you still live as
long as your name is spoken and remembered on earth. Do you
think the name of Robert Burns will cease to be spoken or
remembered? Burns will never experience the third death!(17)
In a chorus by Handel are these
words…
“His body is buried in peace-
But his name lives forever”
Elton John, a sometime Atlanta
resident over at Park Place, played and sang “Norma Jean” at the
funeral of Princess Diana at Westminster Abbey, and I actually
heard it this afternoon while getting ready to come to the Burns
Cottage tonight. It goes…
“Your candle burned out long ago,
Before your legend ever did
I would have liked to have known you…”
Let me be clear that I look forward
to meeting Robert Burns one day. Since he is the poet of the
people, the “people’s poet”, we should get along okay. But, I’m
not in a hurry to meet him, not right away!
Finally, the New Testament of
Hebrews says in 11:4…
“He, being dead, yet speaketh” (King
James Version)
“He, being dead, still
speaks” (Modern Version)
I’ve said all of this to say to you
that the name of Robert Burns will never die! He still speaks!
It is to Robert Burns:
A man of passion;
A man of freedom and
independence;
A man of verse
and song;
A man of the people;
It is to Scotland’s native son
and national bard
That I ask you to stand, charge your
glasses, TO THE IMMORTAL MEMORY OF ROBERT BURNS, the “People’s
Poet”! (FRS: 2-6-2006)
(1) The Truth
About Burns, D. McNaught, p. 202
(2) Robert
Burns and Cultural Authority, Robert Crawford, Ed., p. x
(3) Hugh
MacDiarmid and the Scottish Renaissance, Duncan Glem, p. 103
(6) Immortal
Memories, John Cairney, pp. 254-257
(7) Early
Critical Reviews of Robert Burns, James D. Ross, p. vii
(8) Robert
Burns and the Sentimental Era, Carol McGuirk, p. xiii
(9) UK NEWS,
November 26, 2005
(10) Robert
Burns The Man and The Poet, Robert T. Fitzhugh. p. 1
(11) Carswell,
The Life of Robert Burns, p. 327
(13) The Burns
Chronicle, 1947, pp. 44-45
(14) The
Edinburgh Literary Companion, Andrew Lownie, p. 74
(15) Familiar
Studies of Men and Books, Robert Louis Stevenson, pp. 35-36
(16) A Passion
for Books, Harold Rabinowitz and Rob Kaplan, pp. 260-261
(17) The Great
Scots Newsletter, Beth Gay, Vol. 2, Issue 2, p. 2
|