Arthur McGill pushed on his hustling
way. He was in his element—a free country and a free hand to any conceivable
enterprise that promised fair results in public good and private gain. His
was a broad culture and he possessed wide, liberal views of men and affairs.
His domestic relations were a model of kindest solicitude and love and his
doors were open to wayfarers and friends alike with a welcome so hearty and
free that it gave zest to his bounteous fare. His heart went out after the
poor people of his native land, who were straggling into the wilds to find a
home in a free land—a blessing unknown to them for many generations, but for
which their souls longed. He picked them up by the wayside and gathered them
into his castle by the big spring, fed them, lodged them and journeyed over
the hills with them to point out the way, and his place became famed from
the Delaware to the Lakes for its unstinted hospitality, especially to
people from the "old sod."
As soon as the erection and armament
of his fortress was completed he turned his attention to the approaches, and
the highways became the dominating object of his energies. The instincts of
the old wagon-master were strong within him, he knew
the value of a good road and how to make it. His
men and teams were at work building bridges and culverts all the way to Lake
Erie, corduroying swamps, grading down hillocks and making communication as
easy as possible from his home to the great natural channels of commerce and
trade. He was not the man to sit down and make plans and drawings and
estimate expenses and profits, as Patrick would probably have done, but it
was his to take hold and force the barriers and complete the job before the
plans were finished. There seemed to be no limit to his force and compulsion
of men and material when energetic push was required. It was said of him
that he never had any friction with his employes, but had a faculty of
inspiring them with his own enthusiasm and zeal in the work which enabled
him to accomplish more in less time and at less cost than any contractor on
the line.
In 1801 a one-horse mail
route was established between Erie and Franklin, which supplied the French
Creek valley with mail transportation. In 1806 the route was changed to
Warren, and a one-horse route opened from Erie to Pittsburg, and Arthur
McGill had the contract of carrying the mail. Arthur, the son of Arthur, the
Pioneer, was then a youth of about sixteen years - mounted in the saddle and
carried the first U. S. mail over the route. It was from Pittsburgh to
Butler - to Mercer - to Meadville - to Waterford - to Erie and return, there
being post offices, I think, at each of the points named, and the young
postman passed his father's door both going and returning. The route was
over one hundred and thirty miles, mostly through woodland and forest. After
the completion of the Waterford and Susquehanna turnpike the mail was
transferred to that route, two miles east. The mode of transportation was
soon changed from one horse to two-one to carry the mail bags, the other the
carrier. This method soon gave way to a two-horse conveyance, and then came
the Stage Company, with its four-horse coaches and aristocratic drivers, who
posed as the social equals of river pilots and other great personages of the
frontier. Arthur became interested, not only in opening up the routes over
the mountains, but also in the stage lines and other methods of
transportation from the East to the shores of the Great Lakes. How long he
continued in the coach and mail business I am unable to say, but he at least
held his grip on the lines until his son Arthur was firmly seated on the
box.
The first twenty-five years
of the nineteenth century were strenuous years for the people of Western
Pennsylvania. Dr. Bates says "they were very poor," and then like several
other writers expends large store of rhetoric on the dangers they
encountered from the wild beasts of the forest, venomous reptiles and
ruthless savages.
Their hardships, woes and
privations, in their lonely cabins, have been sung in song, told in story
and rehearsed in the declamatory efforts of theological students from time
immemorial, or, at least, until they have become stale, but a careful survey
of the ground fails to disclose a solitary instance of the human form being
torn by wild beasts within the limits of our county nor any one being
destroyed by the venomous rattlers. "They were very poor," saith Dr. Bates -
and that is what hurt most.
The soil was good and very
productive - the water and air the best on earth - the grazing grounds the
finest - the pastures the sweetest - the men and women were frugal and
industrious and by no means devoid of intelligence and enterprise. They were
not forlorn on account of the wild beasts! and there was no failure of crops
nor destruction by flood, famine or fire! How is it then that they were very
poor?
There were other reasons for
the hard times that had fallen upon them. They were four hundred miles away
from a market for their products. Pittsburg was not then the "Birmingham of
America" as it afterwards became and afforded them no market, and the great
river trade that in time developed unheard of proportions was not available
for them - their only outlet was over the mountains to Philadelphia four
hundred miles away, and their only method of reaching that mart was on
horseback or on wheels. Under these conditions their means of making money
were very limited, yet they could live and be happy. They had resources
within themselves to improve their lands and furnish their dwellings with
comforts of home production independent of the far away traffic of the East.
They could feed, clothe and shelter their little ones and bide the time for
the incoming tide of improvement trending their way.
But other troubles came to
thwart their purposes and absorb the hard earned fruits of their industry.
Their ancient enemy and oppressor of their race found them out, hidden away
as they were beyond rivers and behind mountains, and with the keen instinct
of a predatory beast made a descent upon their homes.
THE TEUTON CAME.
Dr. Samuel P. Bates, the
historian and champion apologist for the misdeeds of corporations and men,
in his history, entitled "Our Country and Our People," page 182, thus
records the coming of the Dutch, "At the close of the Revolutionary War
several wealthy gentlemen of Holland, who had loaned money to the Government
to carry on the war, desiring to keep their money invested in this country,
accepted lands in payment. The company holding these lands was known as the
Holland Land Company, and their holdings in the northwestern corner of
Pennsylvania were about 900,000 acres."
This would seem to be a plain
statement of a business transaction between the state and the company, and
whatever might be thought of the justice or policy of compelling the
northwestern corner to pay the state's quota of the expenses of the
Revolutionary War, the Holland Company appears in the light of a very
innocent purchaser, simply accepting lands in payment for money loaned. But
on looking further into the methods of the transfer of this vast property
the deal is presented in a very different light, and the statement of Dr.
Bates seemingly so beautifully candid appears misleading, and untrue, in
fact. The Holland Land Company did not accept lands in payment of their
loan, but, instead, availing themselves of certain conditions in the Act of
April 3, 1792, that made a gigantic fraud possible, they, with unlimited
capital at command, entered into competition with the actual settlers for
possession of the lands, and won out !
Sitting in their offices in
the City of Philadelphia, or on the Zuyder Zee for aught we know, with the
maps of the state survey of the lands acquired by the treaty of 1784 spread
out before them, those "several wealthy gentlemen in Holland" located their
claims on every available foot of land in "the corner" under the provisions
of the Settlement Act of 1792, without having driven a stake, or blazed a
tree, or placed an occupant on the ground. This Act contained a clause known
as the prevention clause, which provided that if the settler was prevented
from entering upon the lands he claimed by Indian hostilities he might by
showing such fact obtain warrant for survey on that account. This clause was
ostensibly in the interests of the actual settler, but was later believed to
have been in furtherance of the great conspiracy to steal 900,000 acres of
land in the northwest corner of Pennsylvania.
Having technically located
these lands which gave them a pre-emption of two years in which to commence
permanent and continuous settlement the Hollanders promptly proceeded to
become frightened on account of Indian incursions and claimed title to all
that vast domain under the "prevention clause of the Settlement Act." A more
preposterous claim could not be conceived! From 1784, the date of the treaty
at Fort Stanwix, when the state acquired title from the Indians, to 1804, a
period of twenty years during which this villainy was hatched - two men only
had been killed by savages within the limits of Crawford County, and that
occurred in 1791 and did not drive away the half dozen settlers who in
company with the murdered men had located lands in the French Creek valley -
nor did it prevent the coming and remaining of the Humes, Dicksons, McGills
and others, who made good their titles in spite of the Indians and the
Dutch, having secured their rights to title before the Hollanders got their
clutches on the property. All the time this villainous scheme was in embryo
poor men from the East and from over the water were toiling along the rugged
ways toward this land of promise, unaware of the impending robbery that
awaited them. The Indians kept no emigrants out and the Holland Land Company
brought none in. They were coming all the time as fast as they could -
coming to be skinned, though they knew it not.
The company set up a test
case to establish their titles, which after going through the lower courts
with unsatisfactory results finally reached the United States tribunals and
upon pretexts too frivolous to mention the pretentions of the Hollanders
were sustained.
With the hostile Indians on
the Maumee more than three hundred miles away, not daring to venture farther
East, it was held by the learned court that their presence at that remote
distance, and their known hostility, prevented the Holland Land Company from
putting settlers on their lands along Muddy Creek and elsewhere, and that
because the would-be occupants were scared at the rumor of hostiles
therefore this foreign company, who never did anything for this or any other
country, except in gratification of greed, were entitled to those nine
hundred thousand acres of the most fertile and beautiful lands in the state
at a cost of twenty-five cents per acre, to the exclusion of our own people
! The real facts were, whatever may have been proven before the court, that
not a soul outside the offices of the land company was scared a bit, and no
one was prevented from entering upon the lands except by the Holland Land
Company! This was the substance of the whole matter. It was a fraud from
start to finish, and everybody knew it, but in the presence of the decision
of the Supreme Court of the United States the old men in the woods were
powerless. Once in the saddle, the land business was soon reduced to a
system. Every settler whose title was found defective was ousted or given
the alternative of buying his own settled acres from this foreign
corporation at an advance of one thousand per cent, which was very cheap and
reasonable for such elegant lands; $2.50 per acre was certainly not
exorbitant, and of this the state got twenty-five cents and the company
$2.25, and the settler got skinned. I do not give the above figures as exact
(except the last item), but they approximate the real facts. The rate of
purchase given (.25) is the same as paid by actual settlers under the
Act of 1792, and it is a sure case that these speculators did not pay
more than the law allowed. Millions of dollars were paid by the people for
those lands, all of which went over the sea never to return. It is not
necessary to say that the struggling little settlements in Western
Pennsylvania for twenty-five years, suffered a financial stringency unknown
in any other part of this great free country. Our old men who paid the state
for their homesteads found themselves marooned in this sea of poverty,
without means of escape—yea, "They were very poor!" |