In less than three months after the death of Wishart,
that cruel tragedy was as cruelly avenged in the death of its chief
perpetrator. On the 29th of May, 1546, while the applause of the priests
and friars was still ringing in the ears of the cardinal, and saluting
him as the saviour of the Church; and while he was proudly
congratulating himself on the success of all his
measures, and his now complete and unopposed ascendancy both in Church
and State, he was suddenly surprised in his own strong castle and
palace, and cut off by a fate as tragical and ignominious in all its
circumstances, as any that has ever been recorded in the long catalogue
of human crimes and calamities.
The details of this assassination are so familiar to
all the readers of Scottish history, that it is quite unnecessary here
to repeat them ; while to offer any defence, or even any extenuation of
so criminal an act, would be itself a crime. In so far as the
Reformation was really responsible for the doings ot the conspirators,
its honour must be confessed to have contracted a deep stain from their
deed of violence and blood. But though the atrocity cannot be defended
or even palliated, it admits of being explained. Its chief actors held
the principle, that when it had become hopeless to expect deliverance
from public oppressors by the arm of public justice, it was lawful for
private individuals to remove them as the enemies of mankind. They made
a distinction between the removal, by such means, of private and public
enemies—a principle ot social morality, which was undoubtedly as vicious
in its own nature, as it was dangerous in its consequences; but which
carried with it an appearance of wild justice, that recommended it to a
fierce and impatient age; and which was not without its use as a terror
to evil-doers, in times when law was often too weak to reach the
greatest criminals, and when the worst transgressors of law were, often
the very men whose duty it was to defend and administer it The truth is,
the cardinal had acted upon such a principle himself. There had been
times when he despaired of being able to stop the career of George
Wishart by the impediments of public law and authority; so powerful was
the protection which that reformer had found behind the shields of the
protestant nobles and their retainers; and at such times he had not
disdained to hire the dagger of the private assassin, or to lay the
ambush of armed ruffians. The end, he thought, justified the means.
Wishart, in his view, was a public enemy and nuisance, and everything
was lawful against such a foe. No marvel then, that his own example
should have provoked an act of imitation which was fatal to himself; and
that this should have been the way in which the angry justice both of
God and man should have at last overtaken him, and exacted from him, in
the very zenith of his power, a fresh fulfilment of the ancient and
unrepealed doom, " that whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his
blood be shed."
The benefit which accrued to the Reformation from the
removal of so powerful an adversary as the cardinal, was much more than
counterbalanced by the long train of evils which resulted from the
event. Beaton's successor in the primacy, John Hamilton, though much his
inferior in talent and energy, was almost his equal in profligacy of
manners, and in persecuting zeal and cruelty, so that little was gained
by the change in this respect; while the exasperation of feeling called
forth by a deed so daring and criminal, gave rise to proceedings against
the conspirators, which being extended indiscriminately to all their
abettors, real or supposed, had the effect of retarding the progress of
the Reformation for many years; and of weighing it down with a load of
opprobrium, from the effects of which it could only slowly recover.
The moment the success of Norman Leslie and the other
conspirators became known, and that they meant to keep possession of the
stronghold which they had so unexpectedly seized, they were joined in
the Castle of St. Andrews by as many as one hundred and forty persons,
including many members of the reforming families of Kirkaldy of Grange,
Melville of Raith, Leslie of Rothes, and Balfour of Montquhany, and many
other gentlemen of the same party in Fife and the neighbouring counties.
In the circumstances of suspicion in which the conspiracy had placed
many of these men, owing to their close connexion with the conspirators,
it was natural enough that they should have taken this step. Behind the
strong defences of the castle they hoped to be safe from the new
outburst of trouble and persecution, which they knew must soon follow.
Stjll the step was a false one, and drew after it great disasters. It
identified them in public opinion with the crime which was now to be
avenged; they were naturally regarded as the friends and abettors of the
conspirators, to whom they thus joined themselves. The Reformation, to
which they were all known to be attached, was held responsible for a
deed which its disciples flius publicly countenanced ; and they all
became involved in the calamities which resulted from the siege, to
which the castle was ere long subjected.
As early as the 10th of June, a summons of treason
passed under the great seal, citing not only the original conspirators,
but many of those who had afterwards entered the castle, to appear
before the Parliament in Edinburgh, on the 30th of July. The summons
being disregarded, all who were named in it were declared guilty of
treason; their lands and goods were forfeited to the crown ; they were
solemnly cursed and excommunicated by the church ; and before the end of
August, the Regent marched with an army to St. Andrews, and laid siege
to the castle.
The siege was long and tedious. "The strength of the
place was great, and the art of sieging was then little understood in
Scotland. The Regent, for a time, had only two great cannons with him,
"Crook-Mow and Deaf-Meg;" but these ill-favoured ordnance could effect
nothing against the guns of the new-built block-houses of the castle ;
and though the artillery of the besiegers was afterwards much
reinforced, it never occurred to their inexperienced gunners to avail
themselves either of the college steeple hard by, or the high walls of
the abbey church, as posts of vantage for their batteries. The besieged
were thus able for several months to maintain an equal conflict with
their enemies. Arran being without war-ships, the sea was open to them,
and they succeeded in communicating with the English court, which sent
them timely supplies of provisions and munition.
The Regent at last despaired of being able to reduce
the place, till he could invest it by sea as well as land; and con*
cealing his intention of applying for aid to France, he entered in the
meantime into " an appointment," the terms of which were much more to
the advantage of the besieged than of his own dignity. By these
stipulations, the Castle of St. Andrews was still to remain in their
hands, on condition that they should hold it for the Regent, and not
deliver it to the English; and it was provided that they should not "be
called upon to surrender it into his keeping, until he had obtained
absolution from Rome for the offence of the conspirators in the
slaughter of the cardinal; and had granted them and all their friends
and servants full remission of the pains and penalties which they had
incurred thereby. The siege was suspended in the end of January, 1547 ;
Arran withdrew his soldiers to the south of Forth; and the besieged were
at liberty to come out from the castle at their pleasure, and to resume
intercourse with their friends in the city and neighbourhood.
This state of things continued till the month of June
following, and allowed opportunity for several proceedings of a
religious kind to take place at St. Andrews, which were of much interest
in themselves, and proved of great importance in their issues to the
cause of the Reformation.
At Easter, which fell that year on the 10th of April,
the castle gates were opened to receive John Knox. He was accompanied by
three young gentlemen, his pupils—Francis and George Douglas of
Longniddry, and Alexander Cockburn of Ormiston; and he had repaired to
the castle as a place of safety from the persecutions of the new
archbishop. On the 19th of March, that prelate had presented to the
Regent and his council a supplication in the name of the bishops and
other churchmen, "for help and reraeid against the sacra-mentaries, and
those infected with the pestilential heresy of Luther;" stating, as the
special occasion of this request, "that persons who had formerly been
banished for heresy, were now coming openly and without any fear, not
only into the remote parts of the realm, but even into the court •and
presence of their lordships; and were preaching publicly and instructing
others in their damnable heresies." The death of the cardinal would
appear to have given new boldness to the friends of truth; and this
again to have stirred up the clergy to renewed severities. In such
circumstances, it was natural that Knox, who had associated himself so
openly with Wishart, should be one of the first to be pursued; and he
had for some time been removing from place to place, in order to elude
the vigilance of his enemies. But at length, growing weary of such a
life, he had resolved to leave the kingdom, and to go on a visit to the
universities of Germany, when his friends, the Lairds of Ormiston and
Longniddry, earnestly pressed him to betake himself with their sons to
St. Andrews; in order that "he might have the benefit of the castle, and
their children might continue to have the benefit of his doctrine."
He was now in the prime of manhood—upwards of forty
years of age; and his remarkable manner of teaching the principles of
religion to his young charge, soon drew upon him the eyes of all the
more godly portion of the inhabitants both of the castle and the city.
He tells us that, " he began to exercise his pupils after his accustomed
manner. Besides their grammar and other human authors, he read unto them
a catechism, an account whereof he caused them to give publicly in the
parish church of St. Andrews. He read moreover unto them the Evangel of
John; and that lecture he read in the chapel within the castle at a
certain hour."
There were among his auditors, on these occasions,
several men who were able to appreciate perfectly the purity and the
power of his teaching. One of these was John "Rough, who had taken
refuge in the castle soon after the slaughter of the cardinal, and had
all along acted as chaplain to the besieged ; another was Henry Balnaves,
an eminent lawyer, and one of the judges of the kingdom, who had early
embraced the Reformation, and was one of its most distinguished
ornamental and a third was Sir David Lindsay of the Mount, the
Lion-king, whose frequent presence in the castle at that time, while
quite consistent with the duty of his office—inasmuch as the fortress
was then held in the governor's name and behalf, is a remarkable proof
of the interest which he continued to take in the cause of the
Reformation, even in this the lowest ebb of its fortunes. These men saw
at a glance the high powers of the tutor of Longniddry as a religious
teacher; and they perceived how much would be gained to the cause of
truth by converting the modest tutor into a public preacher of the word.
What followed can best be told in the words of Knox himself:—"They of
the place, but especially Maister Henry Balnaves, and John Rough,
preacher, perceiving the manner of his doctrine, began earnestly to
travail with him, that he would take the preaching place upon him; but
he utterly refused, alleging 'that he would not run where God had not
called him,' meaning that he would do nothing without a lawful vocation.
Whereupon, they privily among themselves advising, having with them in
counsel Sir David Lindsay of the Mount, they concluded that they would
give a charge to the said John, and that publicly, by the mouth of their
preacher; and so, upon a certain day, a sermon being had of the election
of ministers, what power the congregation (how small that ever it was,
passing the number of two or three) had above any man, in whom they
supposed and espied the gifts of God to be, and how dangerous it was to
refuse and not to hear the voice of such as desire to be instructed ;
these and other heads (we say) declared, John Rough, preacher, directed
his words to John Knox, saying, ' Brother, ye shall not be offended,
albeit I speak unto you that which I have in charge, even from all those
that are here present, which is this, in the name of God, and of his Son
Jesus Christ, and in the name of these that presently call you by my
mouth, I charge you that ye refuse not this holy vocation, but as you
tender the glory of God, the increase of Christ's Kingdom, the
edification of your brethren, and the comfort of me, whom you understand
well enough to be oppressed by the multitude of labours, that ye take
upon you the public office and charge of preaching, even as ye look to
avoid God's heavy displeasure, and desire that he shall multiply his
graces with you.' And in the end, he said to those that were present,
'Was not this your charge to me and do ye not approve this vocation?'
they answered, 'It was, and we approve it;' whereat the said John,
abashed, burst forth in most abundant tears, and withdrew himself to his
chamber. His countenance and behaviour, from that day till the day that
he was compelled to present himself to the public place of preaching,
did sufficiently declare the grief and trouble of his heart, for'no man
saw any sign of mirth of him, neither yet had he pleasure to accompany
any man, many days together."
The intrepid boldness with which Knox soon after
began to exercise his ministry formed a singular contrast to the
unaffected modesty and reluctance with which he had consented to
undertake it His first public sermon was in a high degree
characteristic, both of his principles and his temper as a Reformer. It
struck the key-note in truth of his whole subsequent preaching, and
however much he may have afterwards learned in point of theological
erudition from his intercourse with the English and Continental
Reformers, it is plain that all the main principles of his teaching were
already fixed, and that in point of clearness of perception, strength of
conviction, and unsparing vigour of application of the truth both for
instruction and reproof, he was already all that his later ministrations
evinced him to be.
His first sermon arose out of a controversy which he
had begun to wage with Dean John Annan, of St. Andrews. He had already
"beaten the Dean," as he tells us, "from all his defences, and compelled
him to fly to his last refuge, that is, the authority of the Church."
"This authority," exclaimed Annan one day from the pulpit of the parish
church, "damns all Lutherans and heretics, and therefore I need no
farther disputation." But Knox, who was in the audience, replied aloud,
"Before we hold ourselves, or you can prove us
sufficiently convicted of heresy by the authority of the Church, we must
define the Church by the right notes given to us in God's Scripture of
the true Church; for as for your Roman Kirk, as it is now corrupted, and
the authority thereof, wherein stands the hope of your victory, I no
more doubt that it is the synagogue of Satan, and the Head thereof,
called the Pope, to be that Man of Sin of whom the apostle speaks, than
I doubt that Jesu? Christ suffered by the procurement of the visible
Kirk of Jerusalem. Yea, I offer, myself by word or write to prove the
Roman Church to be, this day, further degenerate from the purity which
was in the days of the apostles, than was the Church of the Jews from
the ordinance given by Moses, when they consented to the innocent death
of Jesus Christ." The people hearing the offer, cried out with one
consent, "We cannot all read your writings, but we may all hear your
preaching, therefore we require you, in the name of God, that ye will
let us hear the probation of that which ye have affirmed; for if it be
true we have been miserably deceived." And so the next Sunday was
appointed to express his mind in the public preaching place.
We cannot find space for even an outline of this
remarkable sermon. We can only tell that the drift of it was to prove
that the Papacy is the great Antichrist, being contrary to Christ both
in life, doctrine, laws, and subjects; that the intrepid preacher
alleged in proof of his theme, manifold arguments from Scripture, from
the Fathers, and from history; and that he wound up with the challenge,
that, "if any here (and there were present, the university, John Major,
the sub-prior, and many canons, with some friars of both the orders)
will say that I have alleged Scripture, doctor, or history, otherwise
than it is written, let them come unto me with sufficient witness, and
by conference I shall let them see not only the original, where my
testimonies are written, but I shall prove that the writers meant as I
have spoken."
Of this his first sermon, he tells us, "there were
divers bruits. Some said, "Others sned {i.e. lopped) the branches
of the papistry, but he strikes at the root to destroy the whole."
Others said, " Maister George Wishart spake never so plainly, and yet he
was burnt; even so will he be in the end." Others said, "The tyranny of
the cardinal made not his cause the better, neither yet the suffering of
God's servant made his cause the worse; and therefore we would counsel
you to provide better defences than fire and sword, for it may be that
else ye will be disappointed; men now have other eyes than they had
then." These remarks passing from mouth to mouth indicated that a great
step in advance had now been taken by the Scottish Reformation. In the
person and ministry of Knox it had entered upon a new stage. Hamilton,
Wishart, and others had condemned particular doctrines and rites of the
Church of Rome, but now a great preacher stood forth to deny the
authority of the Church of Rome itself. If that authority should fall,
all the Church's powers and prerogatives, doctrines and institutes, must
fall with it in one mighty overthrow. If the Church of the Popes was
Antichrist, how could it be any true part of the body of Christ and how
could it have any claim whatever to the submission, or even to the
deference, of the Christian world?
No wonder the archbishop-elect was astonished and
scandalized to hear that such teaching was permitted and listened to in
the parish church of his metropolitical city; and that he wrote
instantly to John Wynram the sub-prior, who was acting as Vicar-General
of the province, "that he marvelled that he should suffer such heretical
and schismatical doctrine to be taught, and not to oppose himself to the
same." Wynram was obliged to do something to save appearances; but the
course he took was highly characteristic He summoned Knox and Rough to
appear before a convention of theologians, in St. Leonard's college, to
answer to certain articles gathered out of their sermons; but he soon
put them at their ease, by telling them, in effect, that he had invited
them to a conference, without meaning to put them upon their trial.
"The strangeness of these articles," said he, after
the list had been read over, "has moved us to call for you, to hear your
own answers." "For my part," replied Knox, "I praise my God that I see
so honourable and apparently so modest and quiet an auditure. But
because it is long since I have heard that you are one who is not
ignorant of the truth, I must crave of you, in the name of God, yea, and
I appeal your conscience before that supreme Judge, that if ye think any
article there expressed contrarious unto the truth of God, ye would
oppose yourself plainly to it and suffer not the people to be therewith
deceived. But and if in your conscience ye know the doctrine to be true,
then will I crave your patronage thereto ; that by your authority the
people may be moved the rather to believe the truth, whereof many doubt,
by reason of our youth." To which the sub-prior answered, "I came not
here as a judge, but only familiarly to talk; and therefore I will
neither allow nor condemn ; but if ye list, I will reason :" And then
followed a friendly disputation between him and Knox, upon the question
moved by the sub-prior, Why may not the kirk, for good causes, devise
ceremonies to decore the Sacraments and other parts of God's service
1
The argument was a short one; for Wynram was only
half in earnest, and was more disposed, to jest than to reason. "Forgive
me/' said he to Knox, who had used the liberty of saying that he would
they should not jest in so grave a matter; "forgive me; and now,
father," turning to Gray-friar Arbuckle, who stood by eager to enter the
lists,"follow the argument. Ye have heard what I have said, and what is
answered to me again;" and then ensued a somewhat lengthened encounter
between the Reformer and the too confident friar. Arbuckle began boldly
thus: "I shall prove plainly that ceremonies are ordained by God; I will
even prove these that ye damn to be ordained of God." "The proof
hereof," said the Reformer quietly, "I would gladly hear." The friar's
proof, of course, was quite beside the mark, ludicrously so indeed; and
only gave advantage against himself to his powerful antagonist.
Arbuckle then left the high ground of divine
appointment which he had first taken up, and began to allege "that we
ought not to be so straitly bound to the word," as Knox contended. But,
"while he wandered about in the mist, he fell into a foul mire, for he
affirmed, *That the apostles had not received the Holy Ghost, when they
did write their epistles; but afterwards they received Him, and then
they did ordain the ceremonies.'" "Few would have thought," says Knox, "
that so learned a man would have given so foolish an answer; and yet it
is even as true as that he bare a gray cowl." The sub-prior was as much
scandalized at the Father's blunder, as Knox. "Father," cried he, "What
say ye? God forbid that ye affirm that; for then, fareweel the ground of
our faith." "The friar, astonied, made the best shift that he could to
correct his fall, but it would not be. John Knox brought him oft again
to the ground of the argument, but he would never answer directly, but
ever fled to the authority of the kirk. Whereto the said John answered
oftener than once," That the spouse of Christ had neither power nor
authority against the word of God." Then said the friar, " ye will leave
us no kirk."
The Inquisition demanded by the primate, ended, by
Wyn-ram's astute management, in smoke instead of fire; and the Heformers
were both left at liberty to reiterate their articles in the pulpit as
oft as they pleased. The only limitation put upon them was, that they
were kept out of the pulpit of the parish church on Sundays by the
appointment of others to preach, whose sermons were "penned to offend no
man;" but they might preach on other days—a liberty which Knox turned to
the utmost account; and not without fruit, for "God," he records, "so
assisted his weak soldier, and so blessed his labours, that not only all
those of the castle, but also a great number of the town, openly
professed the truth by participation in the Lord's Table," which was
then, for the first time in Scotland, administered in its primitive
purity and simplicity.
These interesting proceedings took place in the
months of May and June; and if the Reformer had been allowed to go on he
would no doubt have reaped still greater successes as the first-fruits
of his ministry; but his labours were suddenly interrupted by the
renewal of the siege. "On the fourth day of June appeared in the sight
of the castle of St Andrews, twenty-one French galleys, with a force of
an army the like whereof was never seen in that frith before." The next
day the French commander summoned the castle to surrender, but its
defenders refused, on the plea that Frenchmen had no authority in
Scottish waters. The Regent, on hearing fcf the arrival of the Frenchmen
whom he had so treacherously brought to his aid, hurried from the
western borders to St. Andrews, to co-operate with the besiegers. The
trenches were opened on the 24th of July. The steeple of St. Salvator's
College, and the towers and walls of the Abbey were converted into
batteries by the French gunners, who smiled at the simplicity of the
garrison in having allowed these commanding eminences to fall into their
hands. So long as the attack was made only from the sea the defence was
hopefully maintained ; but the besieged were soon brought to terms when
the gunners were able to open upon them their land batteries. In a few
hours, as Knox had warned his friends when they bragged of the force
'and thickness of their walls, the defences crumbled like egg-shells
before that formidable foreign artillery; and William Kirkaldy went
forth with a flag of truce to capitulate with the French commander. The
conditions obtained were, that the lives of all within the castle should
be spared; that they should be safely transported to France; and "in
case they could not be content to remain in service and freedom there
upon such conditions as should be offered them by the French king, they
should be safely conveyed, at his charge, to any other country, except
Scotland, which they would require." Prisoned and bound in the French
galleys, they were all doomed to go forth into perpetual exile; many of
them with the sentence of forfeiture and outlawry upon their heads;
excommunicated by the church, and deprived of all their lands and goods
by the state.
In a few days thereafter, the last galley had
disappeared below the horizon, that bore away to France the mixed
company of good and bad men who had been so long associated together
within the walls of the castle of St. Andrews. It was one of the worst
results of the conspiracy against Beaton, that it ended in driving into
protracted exile men like Henry Balnaves, and John Rough, and John Knox;
and in leaving the kingdom for years destitute of teachers to carry on
the work which had been so prosperously begun. So different, so
opposite, are the results of doing God's work in God's own appointed
way, and of doing it in a way of man's own impatient and rash invention
! By faithful labour and patient martyr-like endurance, the Reformation
prospered and triumphed in the hands of Hamilton and Wishart and other
worthies; but in the hands of the Kirkaldies, and the Leslies, and the
Melvilles, the cause had been covered with a cloud of public opprobrium;
and but for the providential appearance of Knox at that critical moment,
would have been brought into danger of a hopeless overthrow. Indeed, as
Knox himself, its new champion, was involved along with the rest in the
final disaster, it was natural that the churchmen should have triumphed,
as he tells us they did, in the complete ruin of the Lutherans and
Sacramentaries. "In Scotland that summer, was nothing but mirth, for all
went with the priests even at their own pleasure. The joy of the papists
both of Scotland and France was in full perfection, and this was their
song of triumph :—
'Priests content ye now, priests content ye now,
For Normand and his company have filled the galleys fou'.
And so judged the ungodly that after that in Scotland
should Christ Jesus never have triumphed."