WILLIAM DYCE, H.R.S.A., R.A. Born, 1806; died, 14th February 1864.
Perhaps, with the exception of Edinburgh, no city
in Scotland can claim the credit of having produced so many artists as
Aberdeen, the very cradle as it might be called of Scottish art, and
William Dyce is one of whom the old University city has reason to be
proud. His father, Dr William Dyce, F.R.S.E., was a physician, and had
his son educated at the Marischal College, where his rapid progress
resulted in the distinction of M.A. gained at the early age of sixteen.
Having resolved to become an artist, after a little study in Edinburgh
he went to London, where he was admitted as a probationer at the Royal
Academy, but left owing to his dissatisfaction with the instruction
there.' In 1825, at the age of nineteen, he went to Rome on the advice
and in company with his friend Mr Day of London, where he remained nine
months, which were devoted to the study of the old masters, and then
returned to his native town on account of his health. At this time he
painted several pictures, the most important of which was Bacchus nursed
by the Nymphs of Nyssa, painted under the influence, although not in
direct imitation of the works of Poussin and Titian, which he had
studied in Italy, besides decorating one of the rooms in his father's
house with classic arabesques. He exhibited the Bacchus in the Royal
Academy in 1827, and in the following autumn returned to Rome, where he
remained three years, devoted to the study of the fresco and other wall
decorations of the early Italian masters, imbibing much of the
simplicity of their works. These works at that time formed the models
for study by Overbeck and the other German artists then in Rome
endeavouring to revive the ancient art of fresco-painting, for
introduction into their native country. While in the great Roman city,
he painted a Madonna and Child in the old Italian purist manner, which
so excited the admiration of Overbeck and his Teutonic confreres, that
they proposed subscribing for its purchase, under the impression that
Dyce was leaving Rome on account of want of money.
He took up his residence in Edinburgh in 1829,
where he remained eight or nine years, during which he painted a
semicircular- shaped altar-piece of a Dead Christ, an Italian
Beggar-Boy, a large Descent of Venus (which attracted considerable
attention at the Royal Academy in 1836), Trudchen (from 'Quentin Durward'),
and the important picture of Francesca da Rimini, besides the cartoon of
the Judgment of Solomon, executed in competition for the prizes offered
by the Trustees of the Board of Manufactures. The two last-mentioned
works are in the Scottish National Gallery. The cartoon is painted in
tempera, and was awarded a prize of £30. The Francesca da Rimini is in
oil, nearly seven feet in length, and represents the daughter of Polenta
seated on a terrace, with the deputy-lover Paolo,
"Of evil thoughts unheeding;"
while the half-length figure of the assassin
Lanciotto, stiletto in hand, formerly appeared creeping forward from the
right-hand corner of the picture.
Not
finding this class of work receiving sufficient recognition, he painted
several portraits, the earliest -of which was a copy of one by Lawrence,
of Lord Seaforth, the father of the Honourable Mrs Mackenzie; and in
1837, was appointed to the not very remunerative position of Master of
the Trustees' Academy. About this time he published a pamphlet, written
in conjunction with the late Charles Heath Wilson, and addressed to Mr
Maconochie Wellwood (Lord Meadowbank), suggesting a scheme for the
improvement of the School of Design, in consequence of which coming
under the notice of the Council of the Schools of Design in London, he
was employed to act as secretary to the newly established institution at
Somerset House. His connection with the Trustees' Academy thus only
lasted for eighteen months.
After
receiving this appointment, he was authorised by the President of the
Board of Trade to go on a mission of inquiry into the working of Schools
of Design in Prussia, Bavaria, and France. His report, dated the 27th of
April 1838, and printed two years later on the motion of Joseph Hume,
led to the remodelling of similar schools in London. He resigned this
office in 1843, in consequence of his unwillingness to give so much of
his time as the Council required, and accepted the appointment of
Inspector of Provincial Schools, with a seat at the Council, which
office he also resigned on the roth June 1845. At the expiry of two
years he again resumed his connection with the Government Department of
Practical Art as it came to be called, and was appointed Master of
Design, other two head-masters being also employed. He had been called
in by the Council to assist in the removal of the grave defects which
had already begun to creep into the system, but threw up the office
after a few months' trial, disgusted with the impracticable nature of
the management.' While admitting his great abilities, which could not
but be acknowledged, many have stated that he was impracticable, and
would make no allowance for the opinions of those with whom he had to
co-operate. Mr Richard Redgrave, who was early connected with the
Department of Art, says that he was constitutionally unfitted to fill
any position of joint authority; but if we investigate into the
abilities of those with whom he had to co-operate, it might be
reasonably concluded that the opinions opposed to his own were worth
nothing, and much of the impracticability lay on the side of those to
whom he found himself in opposition. The management of the Department of
Practical Art had been at no time very practical, and is at the present
day even full of grave and serious deficiencies, besides being as
cumbersome as it is expensive and unsatisfactory. During Dyce's
connection with the Department he superintended the getting up of a
series of outline drawings of ornament, which the directorate of the
Schools of Design still use and recognise as a standard work.
His practice as an artist, although thus seriously
interfered with, was not altogether relinquished. In 1839 he exhibited
at the Royal Academy St Dunstan separating Edwy and Elgiva; in the
following year, Titian teaching Irene de Spilembergo; in 1843, Jessica;
and in 1841, at the British Institution, the Christian Yoke. During his
residence at Rome he had acquired some practical knowledge of the art of
fresco-painting, chiefly through his association, already mentioned,
with the German Overbeck and others. This knowledge was still further
extended by his visit to Prussia and Bavaria, more especially in the
Bavarian capital. The result of this was, that at the Westminster Hall
competition he exhibited two heads executed in that manner, for a
composition representing the Consecration of Archbishop Parker in
Lambeth Palace in 1559. These two heads were mentioned by a German
critic as constituting one of the most meritorious productions in the
exhibition. This led to his selection as one of six artists who were
employed to paint compartments; among the others being Maclise, Tenniel,
and Armytage.
In 1846, in the House of
Lords, he painted the Baptism of King Ethelbert; and in 1848 commenced a
series of frescoes, which he undertook to finish in eight years, in the
Queen's Robingroom; similar commissions having been given by her Majesty
to Sir Charles Eastlake and several other eminent artists. Those which
he finished consist of Religion, Generosity, and Courtesy, on the west
wall; and on the north wall, Mercy, and the Court of King Arthur, the
subjects being taken from the medieval 'Morte d'Arthur.' The series was
not completed on account of ill health and other unavoidable causes,
besides being dissatisfied with the selection of subjects. The House of
Commons, irritated by the delay, loudly complained, and blamed the
Commission for not hastening on the work. The eight years had elapsed;
the full price of the whole series had been paid to the artist, to whom
the clamour was a source of great irritation, probably increased by the
wasting illness from which he was suffering. Finding his health
gradually becoming worse, he wished to throw up the commission
altogether, and in order to relieve his mind, offered to return the
amount which had been overpaid in advance. A committee of the House of
Commons was appointed, which overturned the engagements made between the
Fine Arts Commission and the artists, and fully justified Dyce by
increasing the remuneration of the others engaged.' His other works in
fresco are: Comus, in the Summer-House at Buckingham Palace; Neptune
giving the Empire of the Sea to Britannia, at Osborne; and the nine
decorations in All Saints' Church in Margaret Street, London. The
cartoon of St Peter for the last, as well as those for the decorations
in the Queen's Robing-room at Westminster Palace, are in the possession
of the Royal Scottish Academy. Along with these works may be mentioned
his cartoons for the stained glass in Ely Cathedral, known as the
Choristers' window, the subject of which is, "Praise ye the Lord, ye
angels of His"; and another window in the Church of St Paul at Alnwick,
in memory of the Duke of Northumberland, representing St Paul and St
Barnabas preaching at Antioch, which was executed in Munich.
In 1846 he exhibited at the Royal Academy a Madonna
and Child, which was purchased by the Prince Consort; in 1847, the
sketch for the Neptune, painted in Osborne House; in 1848, Omnia Vanitas,
and a sketch of one of the Arthurian frescoes; in 18o and 1853,
different treatments of the Meeting of Jacob and Rachel; in 1851, King
Lear and the Fool; in 1855, Christabel; succeeded by the Good Shepherd,
Titian preparing to make his first Essay in Colouring, the Man of
Sorrows, St John leading home his adopted Mother, and George Herbert at
Bemerton, the latter being a fine work full of devotional feeling. As a
pre-Raphaelite painter of landscape, he has left a prominent example in
his Pegwell Bay, which was shown at the Leeds exhibition of 1868: a most
exquisite study, full of beautiful and careful detail—flooded with
daylight and a sunny effect of colour.
From what has been already mentioned, the general style of his work may
to some extent be understood. He drew gracefully and correctly; his
colour generally is tender and agreeable; not often aiming at the
qualities for which the great Italian colourists are so celebrated. In
this respect, however, few artists are so varied in their works. Passing
from his admirable full-length portrait of Dr Hamilton, rich, dark, and
natural, to the infant Hercules, which strikes a key of colour midway
between Rubens and Titian; the Paul-Veronese-like treatment of the
cartoon for the Judgment of Solomon; the broad, simply painted episode
of Francesca da Rimini; or his small landscapes,—it is difficult to
believe them the works of the same artist. He made some essays in
etching, in which, had he pursued the practice further, he would have
taken a high position. Comparatively little known are a series of
exquisite small plates, illustrative of some Highland tales by Sir
Thomas Dick Lauder, wrought entirely with the needle, and left as the
etching-ground had been cleaned off. They consist of groups of figures
most delicately executed and finely drawn, with all the freedom, and
more finished than many of the works, of the most esteemed professors of
that exquisite art.
Among other
attainments, this distinguished artist possessed an excellent
theoretical and practical knowledge of music, having been mainly
instrumental in founding the Motett Society, for the practice of old
church-music, which has since been incorporated with the Ecclesiological
Society. He published in 1844 the 'Book of Common Prayer,' with the
ancient Canto Fermo set to it at the Reformation period, with an essay
on that class of music, for which he received a gold medal from the King
of Prussia, who was about that time engaged with Von Bunsen and Neukomm
in framing a liturgy for the State Church of Prussia; and he also
composed music for the old "Non Nobis," which was sung at one of the
Royal Academy dinners. At the age of twenty- nine he obtained the
Blackhall prize for an essay on Electromagnetism, which it is said he
wrote on his return from Rome, when he found so little encouragement in
his art practice, that he thought of turning his attention to scientific
pursuits; and he also gave a masterly lecture on the theory of the fine
arts in King's College, London. He was elected Royal Academician in
1848, and was a member of the Academy of Fine Arts in Philadelphia.
After a busy life of fifty-eight years, he died in
his house at Streatham in Surrey, on the 14th February 1864. |