Registers
A REGISTER of births and baptisms, and also of
marriages, has been kept from the year 1757, bat it is most
irregular and imperfect, there being found on the same page a record
of events which occurred at wide intervals of time, those of an
earlier being entered after those of a later date. Not only has this
old register been irregularly kept, but the number of entries is
small considering what must have been the birth-rate, on a
reasonable calculation, founded on population. The people generally
were insensible to the benefits of such a register, and grudged the
trifling registration fee of sixpence, and only the more enlightened
portion of them took advantage of it. Another influence which
prevented it becoming anything like a general parochial register was
that of sectarian jealousy. The keeping of this register was
instituted by the Rev. Mr Ranken, the parish minister, who, in the
article on the parish contributed to Sinclair’s Statistical Account
of Scotland, published in 1793, says—“Soon after the ordination of
the present incumbent, he desired the schoolmaster to begin a
register of births, and proposed, for his encouragement, to collect
sixpence from every parent who came to obtain baptism for a child.
This being an innovation, the multitude disliked it, on account of
the sixpence, and many refused to registrate the names of their
children for that reason. But by persevering, and pointing out the
propriety of tho plan, those of the Established Church now
registrate universally. The Seceders, however, do not insert the
names of their children in the public register.” Moved in this way
by ecclesiastical bigotry—unwilling to countenance a most desirable
reform because it emanated from the kirk minister—the Seceders of
that generation entailed upon their descendants a loss and
inconvenience they never dreamt of. They felt doubtless that
faithfulness to their principles demanded that they should thus “
lift up their testimony.” The register contains one name which, for
length, rivals that of the most illustrious princess. It runs
thus—Caroline Amelia Eleanora Frances Culy Ferguson Gibson Tomlinson
Thomson. The opportunity that was given at the passing of the Act
for the Compulsory Registration of Births, &c., to supply omissions
in the old register was largely taken advantage of, and many pages
were filled at that time, before the book was closed, with whole
families, not one of whose births had been recorded, shewing the
gross carelessness in this matter that had prevailed.
The population of the parish was, in—
1755 ... |
|
|
|
1998 |
1786 ... |
|
|
|
2600 |
1800 ... |
|
|
|
2350 |
IS11 ... |
|
|
|
2709 |
1821 ... |
|
|
|
3026 |
1831 ... |
|
|
|
326S |
1841 ... |
|
|
|
— |
1851 ... |
Burgh. |
Landward. |
Wanlockhead. |
Total. |
1861 ... |
... 2074 |
6S5 |
Sll |
3570 |
1871 ... |
... 1576 |
625 |
837 |
3038 |
1S81 ... |
... 1599 |
656 |
854 |
3109 |
.1S91 ... |
... 1574 |
591 |
745 |
2910 |
Under the Registration Act of 1854, Wanlockhead was
created a separate registration district. The following statistics
refer to the district of Sanquhar, and are based on an average of
the last ten years :—
The average number of births is 59.8, being at the
rate of 26.8 per thousand of the population, the average of Scotland
being 29. Of these 10.4 per cent, are illegitimate, the average of
Scotland being 7.5. Sanquhar has thus to bear its own share of the
evil repute of the south-western division in connection with this
national vice.
The total number of deaths was 424, or an average of
42‘4 per annum. Of these, 85 died under 10 years of age, 28 between
10 and 20, 25 between 20 and 30, 29 between 30 and 40, 30 between 40
and 50, 36 between 50 and 60, 54 between 60 and 70, 83 between 70
and 80, 48' between 80 and 90, 4 between 90 and 100, while two
centenarians died, the one at the age of 100|, and the other at 101
; so that, on an average, of every 3 persons born in the parish 1
will die before 30, another between 30 and 70, and the third will
exceed the allotted span of three-score-and-ten. The average age of
the whole was 46J years.
The average number of marriages was 12.
The number of inhabited houses in 1841 was 575, and
in 1891, 499.
Education.—The first Statistical Account, speaking of
the educational provisions here in 1793, says—“ There is an
established public school in the town of Sanquhar, and, which is a
singular felicity, furnished with an excellent teacher, well
qualified in every respect to instruct the youth in the art of
penmanship, arithmetic, and all the necessary branches of classical
education. The salary and other emoluments amount to about £40 per
annum. Writing and arithmetic are taught at 2s, and Latin and Greek
at 2s 6d per quarter. The character and abilities of the teacher
render Sanquhar an eligible spot for the education of those who are
destined to fill the higher ranks of life. There are at a medium
about 60 scholars at the school.”
It is evident that, although the fees were so low,
the scholars consisted exclusively of the children of the well-to-do
people; whatever ambition in this direction working people may have
had was effectually kept in check by their extremely small wages.
Almost nowhere in Scotland has better provision been
made in recent times for the education of children than in this
parish. The parish school was supplemented by private adventure
schools, held in a room of the Town Hall, the free use of which was
given for this purpose by the Town Council “as an encouragement to
teachers to settle in the town.” A reference to the municipal
chapter will shew that in other ways the Council evinced their
interest in the cause of education by providing for the free
education of poor children ; but the principal aid given in this
direction was derived under the will of the late Mrs Crichton of
Friars’ Carse, who died in 1838, and left a large sum of money for
the building and endowment of a school in Sanquhar, to be called the
Crichton School. Provision was made for the free education of 20
poor children, and for a farther number being taught at half-fees.
The first teacher was Mr Josiah Lorimer, who at the time had a
private adventure school in the town. He was succeeded by Mr James
Laurie, who retired in 1879, and was followed by Mr R. W. Carson.
These were the educational provisions in existence at the passing of
the Education Act in 1872. The Parish School was, of course,
transferred from the management of the Heritors to the School Board,
but the Crichton School continued to be managed by the Governors
constituted under the Trust. The Parish School buildings consisted
of a two-storey block in Queensberry Square, with the Square as the
play-ground. The ground-storey was occupied as the school, the upper
storey being the schoolmaster’s house. Neither in accommodation nor
equipment, however, did it meet the requirements of the Education
Department, and the School Board had the house gutted, the
schoolmaster being provided with a residence elsewhere. The floor
was taken out, and the whole converted into one room, with a ceiling
the whole height of the house. A large wing was built to the back,
with offices, sheds, &c., and the whole class-rooms fitted with the
most approved furniture, thus converting the establishment into one
of the finest of the kind in the county.
In process of time, the Crichton School came to be
dealt with by the Commissioners appointed under the Educational
Endowments Act of 1883, and in the year 1885 a scheme was drawn up
by the Commissioners, of which the following were the chief points
:—1. The Governing Body was made to consist of five persons—one
nominated by the Duke of Buccleuch, one by the Presbytery of Penpont,
two by the School Board, and one by the Town Council of Sanquhar. 2.
The Governors were directed to close the school, and to sell or let
the buildings. 3. The sum of £10 was set aside annually for paying
the school fees of poor and deserving children, with books and
stationery, the scholarships to be awarded by competitive
examination ; or as a reward for regularity of attendance, industry,
general merit, and good conduct Two Bursaries, to be called “The
Crichton School Bursaries,” of the yearly value of not less than £5,
nor more than £10, were established, which should be open to
competition by scholars attending any public or state-aided school
in the parish, and to be tenable for two years. 4. The remaining
free income was to be paid over to the School Board, on condition
that the Board undertook the following obligations, viz.:—(a) To
provide a sufficient salary to the head teacher of a school in
Sanquhar, who should be a graduate of some University of the United
Kingdom, the salary to be not less than the sum paid to the
head-master of the parish school; (b) To give free education to five
scholars who had passed the Fifth Standard, said free education to
continue for three years.
The School Board accepted under the conditions, and
at once arranged to reorganise the school, so as to effectually
carry out the intention of the Commissioners—that is, to promote
higher education. They arranged to take on lease from the Crichton
Governors their premises, both school and schoolmaster’s house. They
resolved to constitute a graded school of two departments—Standards
V. and VI. and the higher branches being taught in the Crichton
School, and the Infants and Standards I. to IV. at the Parish
School. The former schoolmaster was continued head-master of the
elementary department. The Board, having regard to the excellent
work done by the master of the Crichton School, in the higher as
well as the lower branches, applied for a relaxation of the
condition requiring that the teacher of the higher department should
be a University graduate, and proposed the alternative qualification
of “a teacher of seven years’ standing, of whose qualifications to
teach the higher branches the Board are satisfied.” The point was
conceded by the Commissioners, and Mr Carson was thereupon
unanimously appointed. The staff of the school was fixed at—Two
headmasters, two male and one female certificated assistants, a
sewing-mistress, and two pupil teachers. By offering a high salary,
and taking special care in the selection of an assistant for the
senior department, the School Board shewed their interest in the
higher education. The present assistant, Mr Templeton, conducts
science classes in the afternoon and evening, and the results have
been of the most satisfactory kind, no failures having ever occurred
at the annual examinations under the Science and Art Department, and
the average quality of the passes is much above that of the whole
country. The School is also a Centre for St. Andrews University
Local Examinations, and the students, taught by the head-master,
have taken a high place in the list. Recently an Infant Department
has been constituted, where Musical Drill and Kindergarten Work are
being taught in such a manner as to have earned the high
commendation of H. M. Inspector. Sanquhar has long enjoyed the
advantage of efficient teachers, and in few parishes, it may be
safely affirmed, has the School Board pursued a more liberal and
enlightened policy. No fees are now charged except for the specific
subjects. Salaries—The two head-masters, £200 each; the two male
assistants, £100 and £90; the infant mistress, £60 ; and the
sewing-mistress, £30.
There are also schools maintained by the Duke of
Buccleuch at Wanlockhead for the families of the miners, and at
Mennock Bridge, both of which are under Government inspection ; and
in order to meet the necessities of the families in Euchanhead
district, the School Boards of Sanquhar, Kirkconnel, and New Cumnock
combine in the maintenance of a teacher there ; while, in other
cases, grants are made to individual shepherds to enable them to
board their children during winter within walking distance of a
school. The following is the latest return of these schools :—
For many years Sanquhar possessed the double
advantage of having both the schools—the Parochial and the Crichton
—taught by notable examples of the old type of teacher, Mr James Orr
at the former and Mr James Laurie at the latter, to whose
exceptional powers of teaching many of their scholars, who have
risen to eminence in all parts of the world, and in various spheres
of life, bear grateful testimony. They led laborious lives, and the
amount of work they went through was astonishing. Mr Orr, a native
of Ayrshire, was appointed to the parish school in 1842, in
succession to Mr Henderson, a famous Latin scholar, whose portrait
in oil, presented to him by his pupils, adorns the walls of the
school. The new teacher soon showed that he was destined to make his
mark in his profession. An excellent scholar, he was likewise
possessed of the qualities necessary to success in teaching—a broad
grasp of principles, a clear, lucid style of exposition, a steady,
persistent application of the best teaching methods, and—he ruled
his scholars with a firm hand. This last was specially needful,
where no less than from 150 to 170 boys and girls were crowded
together into a room 45 by 27 feet, the greater number sitting on
high benches without backs. The fame of the Sanquhar “Academy,” as
it was called, spread far and wide, and attracted to it scholars
from a great distance. Some of these boarded with the master. The
training and oversight of these boarders was an addition to his
daily labours, which might well have been spared, but he was tempted
to thus overburden himself in order that he might eke out an
otherwise slender income. The authority which he exercised over his
scholars within doors was also felt outside and beyond school hours.
He was seldom seen in the town iu the evening, but sometimes he did
walk down the “crown of the causeway’ when the children were all at
play. The first boy or girl who espied him as he carne round the
turn at the Council House called out to his companion in tones of
fear and reverence, “Here’s the maister,” whereupon they disappeared
in haste within doors or up closes. The word was passed from group
to group all down the long street, with the result that their games
were instantly abandoned ; the merry voices which a moment before
filled the air were hushed, and the street was silent and deserted.
When an interval had elapsed, sufficient to allow him to pass, young
faces might be seen peeping round this corner and that, and so soon
as his figure had disappeared, the crowds of boys and girls returned
to their games, and the shouting and merriment went on as before.
Were the conclusion to be drawn from this behaviour that his
scholars regarded him with a feeling of terror and aversion, nothing
could be further from the truth. Their true feeling towards him was
that of deep reverence—a feeling constantly cherished by youngsters
to one who both teaches and rules them well ; they knew—for they had
frequent proof of the fact—that their old master had a kindly heart,
and, young though they were, they seemed to understand that the
strict discipline which he maintained was necessary and
indispensable. On certain occasions this stern rule was relaxed.
This was done, not in a hesitating, half-hearted fashion, but freely
and ungrudgingly, and then the true kindliness of the man, and his
attachment and even affection for his boys and girls, were
abundantly displayed. Nothing delighted him more than to be able to
arrange for their attending one of the big “shows” that travelled
the country, or sharing in whatever special amusements might occur
at intervals. One particular occasion of this kind— that which was
the great school festival of the year—was the celebration of
“Candlemas Bleeze,” on the 2nd day of February. On that day there
were no lessons. Each scholar came, dressed in his best suit, one of
the pockets of which contained a sum of money, greater or less
according to his parents’ means, to be offered as a Candlemas gift
to the teacher. The possession, though only for an hour, of
a silver coin inspired each one with a feeling of self-importance.
It was taken out time after time on the way to school, examined
minutely, and thrust back again into the pocket. Each scholar, as he
entered, passed up to the desk and deposited his gift in the
master’s hand, who, of course, looked pleased and grateful whether
it was great or small. When all had entered and had passed the desk
the announcement was made who were King and Queen, a distinction
bestowed on the boy and girl respectively who had made the largest
gift. Two chairs, brought downstairs from the master’s dining-room,
had been placed in the middle of the room. To these the fortunate
pair were conducted, and thereon they were enthroned. The whole
school crowded round and signified their approval by hurrahing and
clapping their hands in a boisterous manner. The only exception
might be the disappointed aspirants, who had missed the coveted
position when they thought it within their reach, but they,
notwithstanding the momentary pang of disappointment, were carried
away with the tide of popular feeling, and, like the others, saluted
their rightful king and queen in a loyal and becoming manner. The
ceremony was soon over, and it was followed by a distribution of
oranges and long snaps, specially made by the baker, and called
“parleys.” At one time the coronation was followed by the royal pair
being carried upstairs in their chairs to a banquet, which consisted
of a glass of weak whisky-toddy, the master and the bearers being
the only witnesses present at this high state function, the former
acting as cup-bearer and the latter standing behind the chairs, the
whole party inspired with a solemn joy. That part of the programme
was, however, in later years omitted. Nothing remained to be done
but to proclaim a holiday for the remainder of the day, whereupon a
rush was made for the door, and all scampered off, but before they
reached home both oranges and parleys had disappeared.
At other times, too, it happened that an unwonted
scene of excitement and merriment occurred within the school-The
master had a strong vein of humour in him, and this led sometimes to
his inflicting punishment upon a “mis-behaver” in a form which led
to the demoralisation of the school to such an extent that “the game
of law and order was up,” so far as the remainder of that day was
concerned. Causing the delinquent to mount the back of another boy,
who was made to carry him round and round the room, the master
followed, armed with the instrument of punishment, a thick cane,
which he vigorously plied. It was observed that the boy chosen to
carry the offender was one whom the master strongly suspected of
mischief, but had been unable to detect in the act, and, as he took
care that the strokes were pretty impartially divided between the
hips of the rider and the legs of his bearer, he so contrived that
the evil doings of the latter should not lose their reward. The
march, under the quickening influence of the cane, developed into a
run, and the spectacle of the panting fugitives, as they made their
hurried flight pursued by the avenger of the law, was one which
tickled the fancy of the school, and produced roars of laughter, to
which even the master in the end gave himself up. It was, however,
no laughing matter for the unhappy pair, but this was reserved for
cases of exceptionally bad conduct, and, both by reason of the
thorough thrashing which they received, and the shame pf being made
a laughing-stock to their whole schoolfellows, it exercised a
deterrent effect on the worst forms of misconduct.
Another example of a similar kind may be given which
illustrates the same traits of the master’s character and temper. A
Latin class which had not their lessons well prepared were “kept in”
after school-hours, while the master went up stairs for tea. After
waiting a long time, with no appearance of the latter returning to
liberate them, they held a council of war to consider what measures
could be taken to remind him of their presence, which he had
manifestly altogether forgotten. The means agreed upon was certainly
very effectual, and, knowing the man with whom they had to deal,
they first bound themselves in a conspiracy of silence. Whatever
might happen not a word was to be spoken. It was agreed that one
should go to the door at the foot of the stair, open it, and there
remain on sentry to listen for the first footstep of the master
overhead. So soon as he was posted, another member of the class
proceeded to the desk, which he opened, and seized the handle of the
bell by both hands, which he then rung in a furious manner. No
sooner had the ringing begun than the master was heard rushing along
the lobby upstairs. The sentry shut the door, the bell was replaced
in the desk, the whole class resumed their places in a row, book iu
hand, and apparently absorbed in study. A moment or two, and the
storm burst upon them. Swinging the door wide open, the master sped
swiftly across the floor, and took up a position in front of the
class. His whole frame quivering, and his voice hoarse with passion—
“Who has had the audacity to ring my bell?” he demanded. No answer.
“Was it you?” he asked the first boy. No answer. And so, down
through the whole class, but all, true to their word, remained
silent, though terrified at the effects of their “audacity.” The
master seemed the very embodiment of the indignation of outraged
authority. Such an act of flagrant insubordination he had never
dreamt of, but, bad though it was, this conspiracy to defeat the
ends of justice was if possible worse. Repressing his rage, he too
was silent for a few' moments, while the poor delinquents positively
shook with fear; then, in tones which indicated that a sharp
retribution of some kind was to follow, he addressed the boy next
him—“James, stand; take the end of this seat,” the other end of
which he had meanwhile seized. It was earned to an open space on the
floor. The same was done with another seat and with a third, the
three being placed parallel to each other at an interval of a yard
or so between each. “Stand,” he then called to the whole class, in a
very determined voice. The boys stood, and were then directed to
place themselves in Indian file behind the row of seats. Their
curiosity regarding the arrangements and what was to follow, had
made them temporarily forget their fears, but they were not long
left in doubt, for the master, stripping his coat, stepped to the
desk, from which he took the cane, and, having placed himself at the
end of the seats, he buckled back his sleeves, and planted himself
firmly on his legs. “Now then, come along,” he shouted. “Come
along’’ meant springing over the three seats in succession, a sharp
cut from the cane being administered as each spring was made. “Next,
next,” he called, till all were over. They stood trying to soothe
their injured feelings by the application of their hands to the back
of their legs, and congratulating themselves that, though a sharp,
it had proved a short punishment, when they heard the call—“Come
along, over again.” Over again they went, but more quickly than
before, thereby escaping part of the strokes. Round behind the
master they ran, and over the seats like a steeplechase, hard after
each other. Realising the humour of the situation, in spite of the
stinging strokes of the cane, they leapt, and ran, and shouted.
Faster and faster they flew till, breathless and exhausted, the
master, flinging down the cane and sinking on one of the benches,
cried—“Go home, you scoundrels.” They picked up their books, and, as
they ran across the square, they heard the peals of laughter with
which the old man made the schoolroom ring.
He was a short, stout-built man, and his countenance
bore the impress of a kindly nature. His figure, as he sat in his
arm-chair, with the short-tailed coat of shepherd-plaid pattern
which he constantly wore, his broad black waistcoat and ample
expanse of linen, within the creases of which there lay little
wreaths of snuff which had slipped from his fingers, and the stiff,
black stock and stand-up collar within which his finely-formed head
was firmly set, is one which will never fade from the recollection
of his scholars wherever they may be. He spoke with pride of his
“old boys,” and his old boys will, so long as life lasts, hold him
in loving memory, and never forget their obligations to one who gave
them so thorough a training for the duties of life.
He died very suddenly on the morning of 25th
September, 1861. He had been seen late the night before, apparently
cheerful and in good health. Next morning the tidings of his death
caused a profound sensation throughout the whole community, and far
beyond the limits of the place. His body was borne by eight of his
scholars (boys), and both they and the large company assembled were
deeply moved as he was laid in the grave. A handsome monument was
raised by public subscription and placed over his last
resting-place.
In Mr Laurie of the Crichton School, Mr Orr had a
worthy coadjutor in the work of public education. Mr Laurie was,
like him, a ripe scholar. He had been taught in the Parish School at
Burnhead, Dunscore, under a succession of able men—Alexander
Ferguson, who was afterwards parochial teacher at Lockerbie; George
Ferguson, subsequently Professor of Humanity in St. Andrews
University; Alexander Reid, author of “Reid’s Dictionary” and a
number of school-books ; and William Moffat, who was translated to
Heriot’s School, and again to the High School, Edinburgh. These
young men all belonged to the neighbouring parish of Close-burn, and
had been trained by Dr Mundell, a great teacher of his day, at
Wallace Hall, there. Mr Laurie pursued his literary studies at
Edinburgh University, and likewise studied and took his diploma in
medicine, after he had received the appointment of teacher in the
school where he had been himself taught, under an arrangement
whereby he was allowed to put a locum-tenens during his absence. In
this remote parish he rendered valuable service by practising as
doctor during his leisure hours. On a vacancy occurring in the
Crichton School at Sanquhar on the death of Mr Josiah Lorimer, in
1844, Mr Laurie was offered the appointment by Mrs Crichton, the
founder of the school, who resided at Friars’ Carse, in Dunscore
parish, and knew well his high qualifications. Mr Laurie’s success
as a teacher in Sanquhar was likewise conspicuous. In truth, in few
towns of the same size could two teachers of such scholarship and
ability have been found as he and Mr Orr, and Sanquhar was justly
counted particularly fortunate in the matter of education. As in Mr
Orr, so in Mr Laurie were found an intellect keen and robust, which
had been assiduously cultivated, a singular clearness and power in
imparting instruction, and an enthusiasm in his work, together with
an authority and influence over his scholars, which made his long
professional life one of honour and usefulness. As has been said, he
retired in 1879, but, though now burdened with the weight of more
than fourscore years, he continues to beguile his leisure hours with
classical and mathematical studies, encountering and solving
problems in geometry which would baffle younger blit less able men.
Mr Laurie, in addition to his proper work of
schoolmaster here also, as previously in Dunscore, rendered public
services of some value. His knowledge of the healing art was
exercised for the benefit of the poor of the, town, and of these
services many a family cherish a grateful recollection. As a mark of
public respect, and to perpetuate his memory in the town, the Police
Commissioners, at the recent naming of the streets, called the lane
which leads to the Crichton School—Laurie’s Wynd.
Poor.—From the following, it will be seen that, when
statutory provision was first made for the relief of the poor, the
applicants admitted were very numerous, though a considerable number
had only small sums allowed to them to pay their house-rents. Before
many years, the roll had been reduced to reasonable limits, and a
corresponding fall in the rate took place. It has varied very little
since, and the number of paupers is smaller now than it has ever
been, while the rate of allowance has been increased very
materially. The great increase iu agricultural rents that lias taken
place within the last thirty years prevented any consequent increase
of the rate that might have been necessary, owing to the larger
deductions allowed from the gross valuation of lands and heritages
in fixing the assessable value. Till recently, these deductions
were—On the railway property, 25 per cent.; and on all other classes
of property, 10 per cent. Now they are—On railway property, 35 per
cent.; house property, factories, &c., 25 per cent.; agricultural
lands, woods, shootings, &c., 20 per cent. The enormous advance that
has been made during the last hundred years, by the improvement of
the land and the general expansion of trade, is seen in the
increased value of property. In 1793 the total valuation of the
parish, exclusive of the burgh and Wanlockhead, was only £2500 per
annum ; in 1890 it amounted to — Burgh, £4043 ; parish, £14,284 ;
total, £18,327. The valuation of Wanlockhead is £1768. Grand Total,
£20,095.
Lieutenant-General M'Adam, who had been married to a
daughter of Rev. Mr Ranken, the minister of Sanquhar, died in the
year 1859, and intimation was received from his agents that, by his
will, he had directed that the residue of his estate, after
providing for certain bequests, should be put into “The Poor’s-box
of Sanquhar.” The phrase being a rather ambiguous one, a contention
arose between the Parochial Board and the Kirk-Session as to the
right of administration, but they wisely, to avoid the expense of
litigation in determining the dispute, entered into an arrangement
for a joint-administration of the fund by the Kirk-Session and
representatives appointed by the Parochial Board, the Moderator of
the Session and the Chairman of the Board being the Chairman of the
Trust in alternate years. The bequest amounted to £350, the interest
of which is distributed annually among the deserving poor, whether
paupers or not.
The natural tendency of a statutory relief of the
poor is to dry up the springs of private charity ; notwithstanding,
there is a good deal of seasonable benevolence shewn by wealthy
people in the district and by Sanquharians abroad • and a
long-standing and commendable custom among the curlers is, during a
protracted frost, to play matches for gifts —oatmeal, potatoes,
bread, tea — for the poor. During one of the severe winters of
recent years no less than 400 stones of oatmeal, and a large
quantity of other commodities, were bestowed upon the poor from this
source. Further, each congregation makes an annual collection for
behoof of its own poor.
Library.—A good subscription library has been in
existence since the year 1800. It is accommodated, free of rent, in
the Council Chamber. It contains 2800 volumes, representing the
whole field of literature, and additions are constantly being made
to the shelves. Meetings are held once a week for the exchange of
books. The annual subscription is 4s.
Savings Bank.—A savings bank for Sanquhar and the
surrounding district was established in the year 1818. The amount of
deposits was as follows :—1840, £5000; 1851, £5732; 1861, £6803;
1870, £10,151; 1880, £16,557; 1890, £18,895. Number of depositors at
this date, 530. These figures bear testimony to the prudent and
thrifty habits of many of the inhabitants. Till the year 1860, the
progress was rather slow, owing to the decaying condition of the
weaving trade, and the closing of the carpet work at Crawick Mill ;
but, from that time, as a result of the high tide of agricultural
prosperity, and the rapid rise of wages generally, the progress of
the bank has been by leaps and bounds, and now it will bear
comparison with almost any institution of the kind in the country.
The sum of £10,700 is invested in land and other securities, and the
balance lodged with the British Linen Company Bank. The rate of
interest is generally about one per cent, above that allowed in the
public banks.
A Choral Union was instituted in 1889, and is
composed of about fifty voices. The two past sessions were each
brought to a close with a very successful concert, and the Society
promises to do something to raise the tone of musical culture in the
town.
The revenue of Sanquhar Post Office in 1793 was £112.
In 1890 (from stamps alone) it amounted to £724 6s 4d.
Social Economics.—The general condition of the
population has, in common with other parts of the country,
experienced a wonderful improvement during the course of the present
century. This amelioration had, indeed, already commenced towards
the end of the previous century, for, in the article on the parish
in Sinclair’s “Statistical Account” we have the following report on
wages:—“Men servants about 1760, £2 10s per annum, and £3 was the
maximum. Female servants, £1 15s and £1 10s per annum. Now (1793),
the former are from £7 to £8 and £9, the latter from £3 to £4 per
annum. The wages of handicraftsmen of every description are likewise
increased in the same proportion.” These figures give the reader a
vivid conception of the grinding poverty of the working classes in
that age. It becomes a subject of wonder to the present generation
that they managed to keep body and soul together. Their food must
have been both coarse and scanty, and, housed as they were in
low-roofed, ill-ventilated hovels, their lives must have been
miserable in the extreme. And yet, we find their parish minister
remarking in the following terms on the improvement in their
condition they had begun to experience:— “If the wages of servants
ought to keep pace with the influx of wealth, the improvement of
land, and the introduction of manufactures, a principle which seems
founded in reason and equity, and if the influx of wealth depends in
a great measure on the improvement of land and the flourishing state
of manufactures, there is no just proportion between the wages of
servants and these two sources of wealth: the former having risen to
an enormous pitch, while the latter are only in a state of infancy.
Admitting the principle, however, on the ground of equity that
servants’ wages ought to rise in proportion to the wealth of a
country, the same principle ought certainly to extend universally to
all other descriptions of men in the various departments of life.
This appears necessary to the very existence and preservation of
civil society, that the various orders of men may not jostle each
other, but keep their proper ranks.”
One is amused with the writer’s crude notions of the
principles of political economy, and the confusion into which he
falls in seeking to give them expression; but not less is one moved
with a feeling of indignant surprise that he should shew so little
sympathy with the betterment of at least the material condition of
his flock. It is evident that the question is in his mind one of
“the masses against the classes.” He is fearful lest the broad
distinction between the two should be lessened in the smallest
degree—anxious “ that the various orders of men may not jostle each
other, but keep their proper ranks that is to say, that the poor may
not, on the ground of their elevation in the social scale, rebel
against the subserviency imposed upon them by long-established
custom, but continue dutifully submissive to the wealthy and
governing classes. A form of advice this which came with rather a
bad grace from the lips of one who enjoyed an income of £105,
together with a very fine glebe of 20 acres of the very fat of the
land—a comfortable provision in times when beef and mutton sold at
3d and 3½d per lb., and eggs at 2id to 3|d per dozen. He thus looks
with a jealous eye on his parishioners, notwithstanding that he
feels constrained to acknowledge that “they are, with a few
exceptions which are to be found in every age and in every society,
an industrious, rational, and religious set of people, regular in
attendance upon divine ordinances, and pay a proper regard to the
duties of social life. It must be acknowledged that the frequent
collision of political influence in the burgh is an enemy to their
peace, and tends to relax every social, moral, and religious
obligation, and as these are relaxed corruption spreads its baneful
influence. No doubt the substitution of dram instead of ale-houses
has the same pernicious tendency. But, upon the whole, their
character is respectable, hospitable to strangers, humane to the
distressed, active in their station, decent in their apparel, and
generally contented with the allotments of providence. Agriculture,
and especially the pastoral life, are favourable to that integrity
and simplicity of manners which characterise them.” |