BEFORE proceeding
further in any detailed description of particular islands it may be
as well to give some account of certain characteristics which apply
to all, especially those which relate to the people themselves, and
in so doing to avoid any possible suspicion of dealing in
personalities.
The entire ease of
manner and savoir faire of the Highlander, remarked upon by many
travellers from the earliest times, is still noticeable, though some
of the causes which so well accounted for it no longer exist.
Personally, I have never seen a Highlander at a loss, even under
circumstances which would have perplexed an Englishman of,
technically, a higher class, and of far wider experience. I heard
the other day of a girl, well known to me, from a very humble home
in a remote island, whom a lady had taken into her service, and was
training in the elements, as she believed, of civilization. However,
on taking the girl on a visit to one of the most sumptuous of the
noble houses of England, she observed that she was not in the
smallest degree disconcerted, and though she showed an intelligent
interest in her new surroundings, had quite the air of being
accustomed to palaces instead of the black huts of the Hebrides.
When the chiefs lived among their people this attitude of mind was
not difficult to explain. The point is well put in Stewart’s most
valuable Sketches of the Highlanders, Section III: “The chief
generally resided among his retainers. His castle was the court
where rewards were distributed and the most enviable distinctions
conferred. . . . His tenants followed his standard in war, attended
him in his hunting excursions, supplied his table with the produce
of their farms, and assembled to reap his corn, and to prepare and
bring home his fuel. . . . Great part of the rent was paid in kind
and generally consumed where it was produced. One chief was
distinguished from another, not by any additional splendour of dress
or equipage, but by having a greater number of followers, by
entertaining a greater number of guests, and by the exercise of
general hospitality, kindness and condescension. What his retainers
gave from their individual property was spot amongst them in the
kindest and most liberal manner. At the castle every individual was
made welcome, and was treated according to his station, with a
degree of courtesy and regard to his feelings unknown in many other
countries. This condescension, while it raised the clansman in his
own estimation, and drew closer the ties between him and his
superior, seldom tempted him to use any improper familiarities. He
believed himself well born, and was taught to respect himself in the
respect he showed to his chief, and thus : instead of complaining of
the difference of station and fortune, or considering a ready
obedience to his chieftain’s call as a slavish oppression, he felt
convinced that he was supporting his own honour in showing his
gratitude and duty to the generous head of his family.”
“Hence,” as we read
in Dairy triple s Memoirs, “the Highlanders, whom more savage
nations called savage carried in the outward expression of their
manners, the politeness of courts without their vices, and in their
bosoms the high points of honour without its follies.” Among the
many more serious results of the introduction of the tacksman at the
beginning of the nineteenth century, was the incidental
disadvantage, that in supplanting the old class of tenant, usually a
cadet of the family of the chief, the gentle classes of the islands
came to an end. The Lowland, often non-resident farmer, was of an
entirely different class from those whose hospitality Dr. Johnson so
greatly appreciated, and of whom Buchanan wrote but a few years
later: “The gentlemen in the Western Islands have, many of them, the
advantage of a university education. They are commonly connected
together by the ties of matrimony, consanguinity or otherwise, which
makes them firm to one another, while the commoners are no less
united among themselves by similar bonds of friendship in their
respective departments.” (Travels in the Western Hebrides, p. 45.)
In listening to
folk-lore and old-time stories, especially in South Uist, now the
home of little but utter poverty and squalor, I have often been
struck by the number of incidents which could have occurred only
where there was a resident, leisure, more or less “ cultured ”
society, a fact which one at first fails to realize as a part of the
past history of this unhappy people.
But, except where the
people are depressed by sheer physical misery, they seem to have
suffered surprisingly little from the enforced change in their
social conditions. It is part of the system of a wide
acknowledgement of relationship, of “calling cousins” to the most
remote degree, part too of the pride which is something more than
merely social—part again of the Highland capacity fpr
self-advancement, that in every rank one meets with persons having
relatives in a considerably higher walk of life, and this, in the
present day, not merely as belonging to the time when the chief at
court was the kinsman of his lowest retainer at home. James Conway,
the observant author of Foray among Salmon and Deer, p. 161, points
out that “from this constant and unconstrained intercourse of the
different ranks has arisen an inborn propriety of manner, and an
easy self-possession in- the presence of his superiors, still
conspicuous in the Highlander and which gives him a decided
advantage over the clownish shyness of the peasantry of England.”
Possibly, however, there is some temptation to lay too much stress
on explanatory causes for a courtesy and grace, which, after all, is
largely inherent in character, and Mrs. Grant (Letter 34) may be
nearer the truth when she writes, remarking upon the refinement of
the inhabitants of even the solitary district in which her husband
was the minister, she herself being a highly cultivated woman who
had travelled widely and had much knowledge of the world:—“You ask,
how people secluded from the world are to acquire manner.* I answer,
that where there is mind there is always manner; and when they are
accustomed to treat each other with gentleness and courtesy, they
will feel that quick disgust at what is rude and inelegant, which
contributes more than any instruction to the refinement of manners.”
“Where there is mind,
there is always manner,” is a statement which is, I fear, not always
borne out by experience, but which has, I believe, direct connection
with the particular people under discussion. I find the following
passage in my own journal, written in one of the islands last May: “
During the past week I have found men—and one woman—with whom to
discuss, much to my own advantage, various questions of local
history, geology, and derivation; many points in politics, present
and past; theology, dispassionate and unprejudiced; Miss Austen’s
novels ; Sir Walter Scott’s appreciation (the word used in its
classical sense) of various writers of his own time; Dr. Johnson’s
views on the Hebrides; Mr. Rider Haggard's experiments in fanning;
the enthusiasm of humanity (the phrase was not mine), and the
distribution of wealth. I think only one of those I talked with wore
a collar—I wish I more often met men in dress suits who talked half
so well. They were speaking in a foreign tongue of books and
thoughts written in a foreign tongue, and their language was the
more literary in consequence; for the Highlander of Miss Fiona
Macleod and of William Black is a man I never met, and talks a
language I never heard, further north than the London stage.”
Happily, the
Highlanders sense of humour conies to his aid, and for the most part
he expresses, not indignation nor offence, but an amused toleration
for the popular portraiture of himself, his surroundings, and his
language. The “Celtic twilight ” and “Celtic gloom” business amuse
him exceedingly, though for Black's descriptions, especially for his
sunsets, he has only unqualified admiration. The language with which
they are credited, however, is a source of much perplexity. A first
cousin of the “Princess of Thule" whose English would put to shame
that of what, in England, is called “Society,” assured me that
neither in her father s home nor elsewhere had he ever heard the
extraordinary phrases alleged to be current in the household of “
the King of Borva,” and which we listened for in vain in the same
district.
However, I asked a
man who had spent his life in various parts of the Highlands, where
one might find the Highlander whose only equivalent for lie, she,
and it was alike “ she,” and after some thought, he replied that he
knew of only one example, which he believed to be the result of mere
force of habit—the case of a man who had eleven sisters!
The Highlander, as I
have known him under a great variety of circumstances, for a good
many years past, speaks English, even when limited in amount, which
may be favourably compared, not with that of the man of his own
class in England, but with that, in many cases, of the University
man and the scholar. It is the English of books, and he consequently
uses such words as seem to him to fit the occasion, without fear of
pedantry. He uses a fine phrase freely and naturally, because it
expresses what he wants to say, and indulges in metaphor or natural
symbols because he thinks in terms of sight, and is a visualiser
from childhood. His use of prepositions is different from ours, but
the fact is often explained by comparison with the Gaelic, sometimes
even by comparison with the French, which was largely in use in
Scotland at the time when “English,” so-called, first penetrated
these islands.
The words, debris,
ashet (assiette), gigot, are in common use. A Highlander always
infuses, not “makes,” the tea; they rise and retire, instead of
“getting up and going to bed”; in the meantime means “for the
present”; presently means “at once, now.” They go through where we
should “go over” a house; they call for, not “upon” a friend; they
say cannot, where the Englishman says “can’t,” and the Scot “canna”;
and they use whatever as a general expletive.
Now and then, in
districts where English is scarce, one comes across a curious use of
words, as, for example, upon a gravestone which commemorated
affectionate and dutiful parents; or another, where a young man, who
had passed a harmless life in fishing and crofting on a very small
and solitary island, was described as “patriotic.” But even in cases
of the exceptional use of words, I think there is often something to
be said for their particular custom as against ours. Of Scotch
provincial uses, they know nothing, and I remember a well-educated
Highland minister expressing his regret, that having bought the
whole of Scott’s novels with the idea of laying up a treasure-house
of enjoyment, he found them “too Scotch” to understand.
The fact of being
bi-lingual gives to the Highlander an especial interest in, and
appreciation of, language, and I have many times observed the
particular attention they give to the speech of a new-comer, and the
pleasure they take in that of any one gifted with power of
expression at all above the average.
There are certain
phrases used in the Highlands which have, one feels, a sort of
historical value, and are born out of the conditions of life. Miss
Wordsworth expresses something of this when she says:
“We were amused with
the phrase, Yell get that in the Highlands, which appeared to us as
if it came from a perpetual feeling of the difficulty with which
most things are procured.”
In the same way,
“Take your time,” is the phrase with which one is constantly
encouraged and reassured by the kind friends always ready to help
one over slippery rocks, or among treacherous bogs. There is always
plenty of time in the islands, and there is no reason why the
visitor should not take as much as he wants. In many districts there
are no clocks: the sun and the fowls regulate the hours, and while
these are active, the day will go on. The story is told of a Tyree
minister who, himself intellectual and literary, was delighted with
the companionship of an Edinburgh official, come over to inspect the
Island Schools, and who checked his companion’s anxiety to be down
at Scarinish in good time for the departure of the Fingal, by the
reiteration of “Hoots, man! What is a handful of minutes, more or
less in Tyree?” with the result that the busy Inspector missed his
boat, was detained four days (at least), and had to rearrange all
his subsequent appointments.
Dr. Johnson, who
should be an authority on the subject of language, and was certainly
not prejudiced in favour of the Highlands, declared himself very
definitely upon this point as long ago as 1773, at a time when the
accuracy of Highland speech could not be accounted for by the
advancement of education, or the presence of the School Board.
“Those Highlanders
that can speak English, commonly speak it well, with few# of the
words, and little of the tone by which a Scotchman is distinguished.
“Their language seems
to have been learned in the army or the navy or by some
communication with those who could give them good examples of accent
and pronunciation.”
He remarks also upon
the presence of books and, naturally enough, upon the unfailing
courtesy and good manners of the people. Moreover, he says, with the
gallantry which the clumsy old Doctor seldom lacked,
“We know that the
girls of the Highlands are all gentlewomen.”
It is a painful and
delicate point to discuss, but I am bound to say that we could not
entirely endorse this opinion, and were indeed forced to the
conclusion that the women of the Islands were, as a whole, inferior
to the men. The physical inferiority, so obvious in the southern
part of the Long Island, especially in South Uist, and, to some
degree, in Barra, may be accounted for by the fact, that while the
man’s work— battling with the forces of Nature, bracing himself to
danger and hardship by sea and land—tends to manliness, the work of
the women, in these days, does not tend to womanliness. Indoors,
without chimneys, without windows that will open, they become
withered and anaemic, their skins are stained with peat, their eyes
bleared with smoke. The men are, of necessity, often away at distant
fishing, and the women have to climb the hills to dig and fetch
peat, bearing it home in creels on their backs ; they have to cut,
and now that there is no common ground on which to graze ponies,
literally carry home the harvest, such as it is ; they have to tend
the cows and sheep, and on account of the absence of fences, remain
with them the whole day, so that the possession of a single cow
absorbs the entire energies of an able-bodied human being. They are
prematurely aged with hardship, bowed with rheumatism, depressed by
dyspepsia, and now that the hill-grazing is taken from them, they
have none of the change of air and scene which the men still get by
going away to fish.
In Tyree, where the
conditions of climate and the general surroundings are so much
happier, we were told that the people had nothing to die of but
“Glasgow Fair,” i.e. of epidemics, introduced from without; in Barra
and South Uist we learnt what was indeed sufficiently obvious, that
those who survived starvation, died of the teapot. And indeed, “the
cup that cheers” is the curse of these islands, in a degree never
reached by the whisky of old times; though I feel I am courting the
indignation of the virtuous in admitting it.
“A man of the
Hebrides, for of the women s diet I can give no account,” writes the
tea-drinking Dr. Johnson, “as soon as he appears in the morning
swallows a glass of whisky ; yet they are not a drunken race, at
least I never was present at much intemperance; but no man is so
abstemious as to refuse the morning dram, which they call a skalk.
The word whisky (uisge) signifies water, and is applied by way of
eminence to strong water or distilled liquor. The spirit drank in
the north is drawn from barley. I never tasted it, except once for
experiment at the inn in Inverary, when I thought it preferable to
any English malt brandy. It was strong, but not pungent, and was
free from the empyreumatic taste or smell.” One must of course
remember that the whisky was home-made, and free from potato spirit
and other modern adulterations. The teapot, which stands by the fire
the whole day, is especially dangerous for a race doing hard
physical labour in a damp and depressing climate, where the food
consists largely of potatoes—often of very inferior
quality—unfermented bread, often made of home-grown flour, musty,
poor, and ill-prepared, with, at best, the addition of boiled fish,
chiefly flounders, if not worse.
That the coarse,
unpleasing air of the women is mainly the result of their
circumstances and conditions, is the more probable that they
continue to be the mothers of fine manly sons of pleasing manners
and appearance; whereas, at an early age, the girls, like their
mothers, appear unkempt, weary and melancholy. What is even more
distressing is the alleged fact that their inferiority to the men is
not merely physical, but that morally too he is the superior, a fact
which the physiologist may again conceivably explain by their
respective conditions of life; speaking always of the unhappy
islands of Barra and South Uist, with which geographically one
should include Benbecula, but that this island, though sharing in
many of the misfortunes of its neighbours, is, at least in
appearance, decidedly happier than they.
One is always so
reluctant to find a definite inferiority in one’s own sex, that it
is pleasant to turn elsewhere and to notice the very high level of
intellectual success which the same class of women have reached in
happier islands; to note, for example, that in the past six years
the dux of the Nicolson School in Lewis, with its very high standard
of attainments, has twice been a girl; that two girls in Lewis have
lately obtained Highland Trust Bursaries; that one has successfully
passed her L.L.A. Examination; to remember one June evening last
summer, when, as the purple dusk fell, at ten o’clock or
thereabouts, we saw a light sparkle out in a solitary cottage on the
lonely reef of Tyree, a tiny shepherd’s hut distinguishable only by
its whitewash from the rocky mounds about it. There, we were told,
lived a girl who, encouraged a few years ago by taking the first
prize at the Oban Mod., persevered in her solitary studies, took
next year the gold medal, and is now an M. A. of the Glasgow
University.
That is what the
Highland girl does, while her English contemporary is scheming to
escape from home, to get paid for neglecting work in domestic
service or business, and struggling to become a “lidy.” Except where
the trail of the Sassenach has corrupted the country, the “lidy” and
the “gent” are entirely unknown in the Highlands. ’Arry and ’Arriet
have absolutely no equivalent, and long may they remain with the
barrel-organ and the Music Hall, the Brummagem jewellery and tawdry
clothing, the cheap trips and low standard of life which have
created them ! However, while I can say with conviction that we
never met any Highland man who was not a gentleman, I am bound to
admit that wo now and then did meet with a woman guilty of the
vulgarity of being anxious to show her superiority to her
surroundings, and as a rule we preferred the surroundings.
The simplicity of
plain living and high thinking are essentially Highland, and it is
still true, as Mrs. Grant of Laggan said in 1807:
“Among the
peculiarities of Highland manners is an avowed contempt for the
luxuries of the table. A Highland hunter will eat with a keen
appetite and sufficient discrimination, but were he to stop in any
pursuit, because it was meal-time, to growl over a bad dinner, or
visibly exult over a good one, the manly dignity of his character
would be considered as fallen for ever.”
The entire freedom
from the fear of death is a characteristic of the Highlanders,
alleged by those who do not understand them, to be among other
attributes which they possess in common with savages. One so
familiar with them as Stewart of Garth is, however, concerned to
show that this is, on the contrary, a consequence of their family
pride, their love of clan if not of country, their sense of the
continuity of their history.
“By connecting the
past with the present, by showing that the warlike hero, the
honoured chief or the respected parent who though no longer present
to his friends, could not die in their memory; and that though dead
he still survived in fame, and might sympathize with those whom he
had left behind, a magnanimous contempt of death was naturally
produced, and sedulously cherished.”
The Highlander,
whatever form his religion may take is religious by temperament;
alike in Catholic and Protestant islands, they are a worshipping,
God-fearing people; even their superstitions, their charms, their
stories of second-sight have mostly a tinge of the consciousness of
the relation of this life with the next. The Presbyterian
householder has family worship before he goes to bed, the Roman
Catholic attends frequent mass, is careful in his religious
observances, carries holy water in his boat, and has special prayers
and blessings for every kind of domestic occasion. The modern
exaggerations of the Free Church teaching, where it has taken root
in the islands, mainly in Lewis, has found a ready soil, though
there are not wanting stories of merry-makings carried on within
closed doors and curtained windows, of profane songs of love and
life overheard in the solitudes of the mountains, even of a
minister, fearful of setting an evil example, yet possessed of a
sensitive and artistic temperament which craves for expression, who
is credibly reported to retire at intervals into an attic of the
lonely manse, and with all precautions as to the absence of his
household, to play upon the violin! For some inscrutable reason the
religion of the Free Church of the islands is incompatible with any
musical instrument, but a Jew’s harp ; whether because it is one
calculated to give a minimum of pleasure, or because the name has
something vaguely Scriptural in its associations, would be hard to
say. In one of the small Catholic islands, the people, in the
absence not only of a bell but even of clocks, are summoned to
church by the music of the pipes, and the congregation, an
extraordinarily good one, is not the less devout in consequence.
Possibly one source
of the “Celtic gloom” apocrypha— unless its originators have lived
exclusively in front of the stage in a Free Kirk island, seeing
nothing of the real life of the people—lies in the constant
allusions to death and the world to come, not only in the songs and
stories, but in everyday life.
Dean Ramsay, in his
Scottish Life and Character, has some quaint stories of this
peculiarity, and Miss Ferrier, in her admirable novel of
Inheritance, has a very characteristic scene in which the young lady
of English education, visiting a sick man and inquiring what she
could do for his comfort, is petitioned by his wife for some “good
bein’ dead claes,” which, on a subsequent occasion she found, far
more to her own horror than to that of the patient, in process of
airing in front of the fire. In a rare book on the Superstitions of
the Highlanders there is a chapter on their amusements, among which
the author enumerates funerals! Without regarding them from quite
that point of view, it is easy to understand that an occasion which
brings together friends from considerable distances, who might not
otherwise meet, to share in a common interest, if not a common
sorrow, is not without its alleviations. It is the great occasion
for showing respect both to the living and to the dead, and in the
islands, where there is often no road between the home of the
departed and the graveyard of his clan, which may be at considerable
distance or even in another island, the services of the able-bodied
men of the district are a practical necessity. The coffin is slung
with ropes, and long poles, sometimes the oars of a boat, are passed
through the ropes to facilitate carrying. Where the ground is rough,
(and the funeral procession often has to cross over the shoulder of
a mountain) the bearers are frequently changed, and it is customary
for six or eight men to walk beside the coffin in readiness to “take
up” as the phrase is, when those who have finished their turn pass
to the back of the procession, and six or eight more step out.
Wherever it is necessary to rest the coffin a cairn of stones is
always raised to mark the spot, and these little cairns, wherever
one finds them, have a peculiar and pathetic interest. In certain
places, where such resting is customary, one sometimes finds quite a
largo number of cairns close together. When the procession
approaches the burial ground, which is often unenclosed, a mere
cluster of graves on the bare hillside, it will, at whatever
inconvenience, approach the spot sunwards (dessil) from east to
west. In the Roman Catholic islands there is a very pretty custom of
throwing a coin into a newly-made grave, to pay mother-earth for her
hospitality. The bareness, the absence of ornament, of flowers, in
the Highland burial-grounds is no sign of indifference or
carelessness. There is, as we have seen, no lack of loving service
and respect paid to the departed. The people are not accustomed to
any form of decoration in or around their homes, and it seems only
natural to them that the resting-place of their loved ones should
mingle with the grass and wildflowers with which they are familiar,
and, it may be, form a shelter from the wind to a wandering lamb or
a child engaged in herding. “In the midst of life we are in death,”
is ever prominent in the mind of the Islander, no mere sentiment,
but a fact which is accepted as the natural corollary of the dangers
by storm and shipwreck which accustom them to sudden death in a
degree of which we, whose lives are so carefully protected, know
nothing. Crioch Onarach, “may you have an honourable exit” is a
common expression of kindly feeling, and “Peace to thy soul and a
stone to thy cairn,” is another phrase in common use, even among
Presbyterians, though doubtless a relic of the older faith. It is
quite common for those about the dying to send messages to friends
who have gone before, generally of a practical kind, that a debt is
paid, or a sick child recovered, or that good news has come from an
emigrant son—something which they would be expected to hear with
pleasure.
From all this one may
reasonably gather that the familiarity with which the Highlander
treats the subject of death proceeds, not from the indifference of
the savage, but from the entire sincerity of his belief in other
conditions of being. The very strong clan and family feeling of the
Highlander comes out nowhere more prominently than in the burial of
the dead. The great desire is to lie near kindred dust, and very
touching stories are sometimes told of the pains taken to accomplish
this even on behalf of paupers and the comparatively friendless. We
heard of a woman who, born on the mainland but married to an
islander, died in her uew home, and all suitable arrangements were
made for her funeral, when there appeared on the scene twelve of her
father s family who had come sixty miles over the sea to carry her
body back to lie among her own people. When the husband
remonstrated, they quietly declared their intention of carrying out
their scheme at all risks; and as the neighbours, while sympathizing
with the husband, approved the sentiment too thoroughly to promise
him any practical help, he was obliged to give in, and returned with
the family to bury his wife in the graveyard of her old home.
Possibly it is from
this very family feeling that a woman is always buried by her maiden
name, so that the proprieties of the Saxon are violated by such
inscriptions as “. . . children of Donald Macdonald and of Mary
Macintosh,” or “In Memory of Gillespie Mac-lean, and Flora Macneil;
erected of their sorrowing children.”
The absence of the
separate family burying-ground (often on an island or in some corner
of land near to the homes of the clan) so characteristic of the
mainland Highlands, may be due to the fact that in almost every part
of the Islands there are the remains of religious edifices,
churches, monasteries, even a hermit’s cell perhaps, which, with
their instinctive reverence for religion and for the past, the
islanders treat as holy ground and about which they bury their dead.
It would not be fair
to pass over the question of the Highland funeral without expressing
regret that it should ever be, as even now, though rarely, is still
the case at times, the occasion for excess in drinking. The practice
of taking refreshment at the churchyard has great excuse in the
conditions of climate and distance, and those who cling to old-time
usage and the traditions of Highland hospitality would be very
unwilling to abandon it entirely. I believe that there is now a
recognized limit of the amount allowed for each person, and taken
with bread and cheese, it seems moderate enough.
On leaving the
grave-side the minister, nearest friends and visitors of a superior
class, commonly adjourn to some neighbouring house, where tea is
provided and whence they can return at their convenience, leaving
those less nearly concerned to remain, often for the rest of the
day, in groups on the grass, talking of business and of family
affairs. Before passing judgment on such utilization of a solemn
occasion, one should perhaps think for a moment on the difference
between our lives and the lives of these simple Islanders, when
perhaps it may not seem quite so obvious that the same rules should
apply to both alike.
Think of the
existence of an intelligent, educated people who have no daily
paper, and very few books, who have no trade, no business, little
work, but that in which they are their own masters, or fishing,
carried on mainly at night; no public house or meeting-place; often
no neighbours ; no local affairs to discuss; no markets, except
perhaps twice a year; no buying and selling among themselves.
Think of women who have no shop- -ping
but at best that from a cart which travels round the island at
intervals; whose household possessions are so few that the “chores”
can take but a very short time each day; who have no carpets to
sweep, no rugs to shake, scarcely any crockery to wash; who, if they
are in need of clothing, scarcely know whence to get the material,
who have no table on which to cut it out; who if they break a
needle, as Dr. Johnson points out, may have to wait weeks to get
another, whose cooking is so elementary that they have need of no
appliances but a pot hung over the fire, though sometimes indeed
they have a kettle as well; who bake their bread on a stone and wash
their few clothes in the burn outside the door; whose fire never
requires re-lighting (it is ill-luck to let out the peats); who have
no shoes to clean, no furniture to dust; who seldom travel more than
a mile or two from home; who have no servants to discuss, and no new
bonnets. Think what it must be in such a life to meet one’s friends,
to hear from one and another, of Neil out in Canada, and Lachlan
away at sea; of Mairi who has gone to service on the mainland, or
Alan who is learning a trade in Glasgow, to ask advice, to compare
notes, to say, “don’t you wonder?”, and “do you remember?”, perhaps
too to mourn together over the friend who has gone, to recite his
history and genealogy, to relate the visions and warnings which
foreboded his death, to speculate on the future of his family, and
the line the factor will take in regard to his affairs.
I have seen these
little groups, decent and orderly, sitting for hours together on the
bare hillside, greeting one another and parting, with much
hand-shaking, for indeed hand-shaking is a great institution in
these friendly Islands, and I have seen no irreverence nor lack of
sympathy in their conduct, nor in their presence there.
The gentle courtesy
of the islander is no mere surface politeness to a stranger. The
kindness of the people to each other and to the dumb creatures about
thorn would be proof of this, if proof were wanting.
The terror and
aversion, passing even that of the mainland peasantry, with which
the Islander regards the poorhouse, is, apart from his love of
freedom, and habit of outdoor life, thoroughly justified by the
nature of the accommodation provided either in North Uist or in
Lewis. That at Loch Maddy supplies accommodation for, I believe,
forty persons with wards and dormitories of size proportionate; but
as a tenth of that number would exceed the average of occupants, the
contrast between the great, bare, high, chilly, expanse of space and
the very close, and, to their thinking, cosy and warm quarters to
which they are accustomed, must upset the most rudimentary of their
notions of life, kind and fairly liberal as is the treatment they
receive.
On one of our visits
to North Uist we were much concerned at a glimpse of a little
tragedy so characteristic that I cannot refrain from relating it. A
poor woman, very old, very feeble, lived alone in a wretched hut,
which was undoubtedly an eyesore to any orderly minded proprietor.
On the other hand, to its solitary occupant it meant home, and the
alternative was the poorhouse. Eviction seemed inevitable, and some
kindly neighbours, we were told, offered to build her a decent
shelter—she was otherwise provided for—if the morsel of land, enough
for an average cowshed, could be granted for the short term of life
which remained to her. But no, among the thousands of bare acres all
around, there was no room for so valueless a life as hers. The time
came—the photograph of the scene is in my possession—when her few
belongings were turned out by the roadside, and she herself laid
upon the miserable bedding which, with a wooden chest, a couple of
chairs, a single cooking pot, a few bits of crockery, constituted
her entire wealth. When we saw her next she was sitting, decently
fed and clad it is true, the sole occupant of a vast dreary “Female
Ward.” “And how did you get here?” we asked, and it is for the sake
of her answer, so thoroughly characteristic of Highland speech and
thought, that I have told the little story. Her eyes filled with
tears, and for a minute she stroked my hand in silence. “It was
himself that did it,” she answered, pointing to the master of the
poor-house, himself an islander, who has since, as often before,
served his country “at the front.” “It was himself that did it, and
may the blessed angels carry him to heaven as gently as he carried
me here that day/’ There was no word of what she had lost, no
reproach, no bitterness. To him from whom she had received kindness,
she had nothing to give but prayer to the One who has “constituted
the services of angels and men in a wonderful order,” a gift which
brings blessing alike to “him that gives and him that takes.”
One cannot fail to be
struck, in going through the Islands, by the singular absence, even
as compared with the mainland, of cripples, or blind persons, or
persons of weak intellect. One obvious, though perhaps superficial
explanation, lies in the theory of the survival of the fittest, in
the fact that a good constitution must be needed to survive
existence at all in South Uist or Barra, though, on the other hand,
that would be less applicable in happier islands, especially in
Tyree, which has so superior a climate.
Lord Napier pays a
well deserved tribute to those characteristics, which, according to
modern theories of psychology, have so much connexion with the sound
mind in the sound body, the just balance of body and spirit which is
health. He writes of the Crofter (Nineteenth Century, 1885): “In the
main his house does not make him unhappy, for he does not complain;
it does not make him immoral, for he is above the average standard
of morality in his country; it does not make him unhealthy, for he
enjoys an uncommon share of vigour and longevity.”
Perhaps the following
expression of opinion in the Report of the Crofters Commission is
even more to the point.
“His habitation is
usually of a character which would almost imply physical and moral
degradation in the eyes of those who do not know how much decency,
courtesy, virtue, and even mental refinement, survive amidst the
sordid surroundings of a Highland hovel.”
Unhappily however,
there seems to be a certain number of cases of insanity, of which of
course one hears only. A recent contributor to the Caledonian
Medical Journal describes certain cases which he had personally met
with as a boy in Uist. They seem to have always been treated with
kindness, and in the Highlands, as in certain places elsewhere, one
wanting in mind is regarded as being in a special sense under Divine
protection—“God’s fool” as such a patient is still called in
Scandinavia, from whence the islanders may have received the idea.
Mr. Macleod’s concluding sentiments must appeal to the sympathy of
any who have ever visited one of the institutions—with all their
advantages—where the mentally afflicted are cared for.
“I presume there are
ainadain still roaming about in the more remote districts, but they
are not seen so much as formerly. Possibly, as in more crowded and
advanced places, they are swept into the district asylum or the
poorhouse. In such institutions they are, no doubt, better lodged,
clothed, and fed, but they, as a rule, do not thrive—they pine for
the freedom of action and impulse, and for the kindliness of
friendship which the weakest of them had bestowed on him from
everyone.”
I remember our
meeting an old woman in a certain island (for her sake I will not
say which) who seemed to be destitute of everything but the
miserable shelter erected for her as a bride, where all her
children, now dead, had been born and brought up, and her tenancy of
which so far had escaped the vigilance of the factor. Without a
morsel of ground on which to keep an animal or grow potatoes, she
was too old and feeble to go any distance in search of employment.
We asked a neighbour how she lived. “Oh, it’ll be just by the
goodness of God,” was the simple answer, not, his might truly have
been said, “by the goodness of the friends, themselves of the
poorest, whom God has sent to provide for her.”
There is a Gaelic
proverb, “Am fear bhitheas trocaireach ri’ anam, Cha bhi e mi-throcaireach
ri bhruid ”—“He who is merciful to his soul will not be unmerciful
to his beast,”—and I think we may fairly say that we have never met
with a single case of intentional unkindness to any animal in the
Hebrides. If the poor creatures have hard work and scanty food, they
are but sharing the fate of their owners; and if, as it sometimes
struck us was the case, more dogs are kept than can be sufficiently
fed, it is because they are the friends and companions of those
whose pleasures and friendships can be but few.
A curious sight, in
certain places, is to meet the cats of the islands coming down to
the landing-place at the time when the fishermen are sorting and
cleaning the fish. In spite, however, of the abundance of this
particular kind of food, the cat race rapidly deteriorates in the
islands. So too do the fowls, for they, like the cats, are by nature
unfitted for cold, wet and draughts, though both cats and fowls live
a good deal on the rafters of the houses, where they get the warmth
of the peat fire burning in the middle of the floor below.
One of the duties of
the constcibal baile, a voluntary officer, elected by the people
themselves, of whom we shall have more to say presently, was to see
that in the hard labour of carting peats and tangles the brave
little horses should not be overworked, but that the various
crofters should contribute a share of the labour both of man and
beast in just proportion. The work is indeed hard, not only because
heavy loads have to be carted over very rough ground, but because
the horses, like the men, have often to stand for hours together in
the water.*
The horses are too
valuable, too necessary to the life of the people, apart from their
natural kindliness, to be unfairly treated. If a crofter’s horse
dies, the neighbours will help him with their own, or subscribe to
get him another. Moreover, in districts where old ways prevail, they
are very careful not to work a horse before it has come to maturity.
Their rules about breeding are equally careful. The Islanders
believe that before the Fall the animals had the gift of speech, and
they preserve the last words of the horse, the cow and the sheep.
They believe that from their superior innocence the beasts can see
much that is invisible to man—or at all events those men not gifted
with second-sight, and many of the stories of visions and warnings
turn upon this special faculty. Moreover, in some places, where the
narrow creeds of modem bigotry have not yet subtracted from the more
genial views of life and death natural to these kindly people, they
believe that as the animals shared in the Fall, so too shall they
share in the Redemption, and that the horse, at all events, is,
after death, in communication with the spirits of the departed.
There are some
interesting sayings about cats. In spite of all the creature has to
contend with it apparently attains to long life even in the Islands,
for they have a proverb that the cat’s first seven years are spent
joyously and pleasantly, but that its other seven years are
heavy-headed, large-headed and sleepy.
Another saying, which
however tends to prove that a shorter career is probable, is that
three ages of a cat are equal to the age of a dog, three ages of a
dog to the age of a man, three ages of a man to the age of a deer,
and three ages of a deer to the age of an oak tree, though what they
know about oak trees it would be difficult to say.
If a cat scratches on
the ground with its forepaws, it is a sign of death, for it is
seeking for a corpse. If it goes into a pot, it is a presage of fish
coming to the house. Stories of sharp practice, such as in AEsop’s
Fables are attributed to the fox, in South Uist and Eriskay, where
the fox is unknown, are told of the cat.
Two old cats went
down to the shore one day and found a large lump of butter. After
much quarrelling as to proprietorship, it was agreed that the oldest
should have it.
“I am the oldest,”
said the one who had made the suggestion. “I am the cat that Adam
had.”
The other replied,
“You are undoubtedly elderly, but not so old as I, for I was on the
earth before the hempen feet [i.e. the rays] went under the sun.
Hand over the butter.”
He ate so much butter
that he began to swell, and he became so heavy that he could not
run, and so when a hungry wolf came down to the strand, he fell a
victim. “It is not good to be telling lies,” as the cat said when
the wolf ate him.
There is a tree in
South Uist, at least there was, though now you would not know it
from a telegraph pole, for it was an araucaria of the monkey-puzzle
variety, said to make and to lose a ring every year. This one seems
to have confined its exertions to losing them. I remember when it
had a ring and a half, now it is gaunt and bare. What misguided
person put a semi-tropical plant in a Highland bog I never learnt,
but next time planting is attempted in this island I should suggest
that some very hardy pines, planted on an artificial mound for the
sake of drainage, and temporarily sheltered by some elders of the
coarsest variety, would have more chance of success.
Strange to say, one
does not desire the presence of trees in South Uist. Never was any
place so dependent for effect upon its own personality, and
something would be lost, I think, by anything which approximated
this with any other place. In Tyree one feels that trees have been
lost out of the island : it was once the land of wood, and should be
so again, but it is not so here. Here indeed, one is reminded of a
story which Dorothy Wordsworth quotes from Sir Walter Scott
(Recollections of a Tour in Scotland, under date September 21,
1803). “ . . . . The neighbouring ground had the wildness of a
forest, being irregularly scattered over with fine old trees. The
wind was tossing their branches, and sunshine dancing among the t
loaves, and I happened to exclaim,
‘What a life there is
in trees!’, on which Mr. Scott observed that the words reminded him
of a young lady who had been born and educated on an island of the
Orcades, and came to spend a summer at Kelso and in the
neighbourhood of Edinburgh. She used to say that in the new world
into which she was come nothing had disappointed her so much as
trees and woods; she complained that they were lifeless, silent,
and, compared with the grandeur of the ever-changing ocean, even
insipid. At first I was surprised, but the next moment I felt that
the impression was natural. Mr. Scott said that she was a very
sensible young woman, and had road much. She talked with endless
rapture and feeling of the power and greatness of the ocean, and
with the same passionate attachment returned to her native land
without any probability of quitting it again.”
In the island of
Tyree, still more when crossing—as one does now on the West Highland
Railway—the Moor of Rannoch, one is persistently conscious that
trees ought to be there; it is obvious they wore there once, and the
landscape requires it. The same is true of many parts of the
Highlands of Scotland, where trees have been destroyed, possibly for
fuel, or perhaps, as within our own memory, on the Duke of Athole’s
property, by storm. None who have seen those thousands of stalwart
trees lying in heaps on the hillside, their branches tom and
mangled, their roots pointing to the sky, can ever forget this
testimony to what Nature in her wilder moods may do, even far inland
or on a sheltered hillside.
Burt, in his Letters,
referring to a quaint book of travel called A Journey Through
Scotland, published in 1723, remarks: “He labours the Plantations
about the country-seats so much that he shows thereby what a Rarity
Trees are in Scotland, and indeed it has been often remarked that
here are but few Birds except such as build their nests upon the
ground, so scarce are Hedges and Trees.”
It will be remembered
that when Dr. Johnson lost his walking-stick in the Hebrides he was
convinced it was stolen, and Boswell could not persuade him out of
the suspicion. “No, no, my friend,” said he, “it is not to be
expected that any man who has got it will part with it. Consider,
sir, the value of such a piece of timber here!”
Macculloch remarks on
the destruction of trees, and says that Johnson’s remark “that no
tree in Scotland is older than the Union ” is likely soon to prove
true.
“In former ages these
trees were preserved and venerated, and by the recollections of the
length of time they had sheltered and thrown an air of dignity and
importance over the castles and seats of ancient families, the
respect of people for their owners was increased and preserved. But
such recollections are now out of fashion, the trees are valued
according to the money they bring, and like the fidelity of the
clansmen, sold to the highest bidder.” |