On Tuesday morning, the
19th of August, a gloomy misty day that seemed to be grieving in sympathy
with her on her separation from her beloved France, Queen Mary arrived in
Leith Roads. She had not been expected till the last days of the month,
when the nobles and gentry had been summoned "with their honourable
companies to welcome her Majesty." No. preparation had therefore been
made to receive her, but the cannon of her two galleys soon brought out
the people in crowds to greet her. She was accompanied by her three uncles
of the House of Guise, by her four Maries, who, like herself, owing to
their long residence in France, always spoke Scots with a French accent,
and others of lower order. On landing in the forenoon beside the King’s
Wark, a part of the Shore that has seen so much of the pageantry of
Scottish history, she was received by the Earl of Moray and a great crowd
of all ranks.
As no preparation bad yet
been made for her at Holyrood she "dynit in Andro Lambis house,"
in Leith, where, according to John Knox, she remained till towards
evening, when she proceeded to the Palace. Queen Mary had not far to
travel after landing to reach Andrew Lamb’s house, for it stood, as
parts of it may still, at the head of the close which has been named from
himself as its chief resident—Andrew Lamb’s Close— and is so
familiar to-day to lovers of old-time Leith by the name of an eighteenth
century inhabitant, Willie Waters, of whom no tradition or history has
been preserved.
At the head of Water’s
Close, on the line of Water Street, stands a fine specimen of the
picturesque street architecture of days long gone by, which shows us that,
if the streets of the Leith of other and older days were narrow and
gloomy, the eye of the wayfarer was ever being arrested by the quaint and
pleasing variety presented by the outline of turret, roof, and gable
against the background of the sky. This Water’s Close mansion, the
finest specimen of old Scottish architecture in Leith, was the house of
the Lambs and theft descendants down to a century ago; but how much of the
old house as it stands to-day dates from Queen Mary’s time it is hard to
say. The dining-room of the Lambs, with its early seventeenth-century
alcoved sideboard, now forms a house by itself of three apartments, and
the other rooms have been similarly transformed. A great courtyard, which
was once the garden of the mansion and in which Queen Mary may have
strolled on that gloomy far-off August day, is now a tradesman’s yard,
and may be entered from a pend in Water Street.
Later in the day the
youthful queen continued her journey to Holyrood. Though
she captivated all by her beauty and stately carriage, her cavalcade did
not form the brilliant pageant associated with the arrival of former
princesses at the Shore, for the two Dutch ships carrying her horses and
baggage had been captured by English war
vessels and detained at Newcastle. In Mary’s eye the ill-favoured
little Scottish hackneys, so meanly caparisoned, on which she and her
escort rode from the Shore to Holyrood, looked wretched indeed compared,
with the superb palfreys and their gay trappings to which she had been
accustomed in France.
Story, but not history,
associates two other Leith mansions with the ill-fated Queen Mary. The one
is Hillhousefield House, now renamed Tay House since engineering works
have invaded its once pleasant lawns and gardens that used to stretch down
to the river’s edge; and the other is the stately old mansion of Trinity
Grove, which did not come into existence till long after Queen Mary’s
time. According to story, the weeping thorn that once adorned the old
garden of Hillhousefield was planted by the hapless queen’s own fair
hand.
But like many another
fondly believed Queen Mary tree, it was not in reality planted by the
queen, but grown from a slip taken from a tree the queen was believed to
have planted. The name naturally continued to attach itself to the tree,
but in the lapse of years the reason for the name passed from memory. The
story of the ancient gardener of Trinity Grove, on his way to Holyrood
with his basket of nettle tops over his arm for "sallets" to the
queen, of which her French upbringing had made her extremely fond, is a
pretty but wholly fanciful tale.
If the sorry steeds which
conveyed Queen Mary and her retinue to Holyrood gave her an unfavoarable
impression of her native land, that feeling would in no way be relieved by
the appearance of Leith at this time. The burnings of Hertford, and the
destructive fire of the English guns during the siege of the year before,
had left much of the town in ruins, of which the greater
Kirkcaldy
made a raid on Leith. Gathering all the victuals he could seize from the
merchants and their ships, he now stood prepared for a long siege. With
the guns of the Castle pointed downward on the houses, he was easily
master of the whole city, from which he drove the new Regent Lennox, the
Earls of Morton, Mar, and Argyll, and some two hundred of the leading
burgesses on the king’s side. Among these were Edward Hope and Adam
Fullarton, two strenuous supporters of Knox and the Reformation, and for
that reason strongly opposed to the cause of Queen Mary. The king’s men
took up their quarters in Leith. It is at this time that the old
Renaissance building facing the Coalhill comes into history as their
council chambers, where they discussed their plans for carrying on the
war. For this reason the old alley leading to it from behind became known
as Parliament Square, which has now given place to Parliament Street.
During the two years the king’s men were in Leith there could be no
regular government of Edinburgh by the provost and magistrates, and so we
have a gap in the council records, which do not again begin until some
months after their return to the city.
The Leithers again suffered
something of the horrors of war, for skirmishes took place daily between
the king’s men in Leith and the queen’s men from the city and the
Castle. But they suffered still more from the harsh treatment and
high-handed dealings of the king’s men from Edinburgh, who had forcibly
taken up their quarters in their midst. These did not forget that the
Leithers had been specially favoured by the dethroned queen, for she had
endeavoured to make their town a free burgh to the detriment of the city
which now ruled them. Their sympathies were thus strongly on the side of
the ill-fated queen and the youthful yet unruly Laird of Restalrig, who
was fighting under the banner of the gallant Kirkcaldy in Edinburgh
Castle.
For these causes little
consideration was shown to the Leithers. The Edinburgh burgesses who had
fled from Kirkcaldy’s guns began to erect houses and booths on their
lands without ever saying by your leave, and when Helen Moubray, a
great-granddaughter of Sir Robert Barton, complained to the regent, no
satisfaction was given. The rude soldiery of Morton who bore the brunt in
the fighting had to be lodged and victualled by the oppressed inhabitants,
who in many cases were forbidden the use of their own houses, which
had been taken possession of by the rough soldiers of the harsh and cruel
Morton.
After the death of Lennox
and Mar, James, Earl of Morton, became regent in name as he had all along
been in fact. Morton was a man of cruel and callous nature, and continued
the fight against Kirkcaldy and the queen’s men with the utmost
bitterness and cruelty. "No quarter," was the cry of the king’s
men now that Morton was in command. All prisoners who chanced to fall into
his hands were hanged in full view of the Castle garrison at the Gallow
Lee, where Leith Walk Station and the tramway depot are now. The queen’s
men of course retaliated in like manner, for no war stirs up so much hate
among a people as civil strife, and Kirkcaldy would string up an equal
number of prisoners on the Castle Hill or Moutree’s Hill, now covered by
the Register House. And so the cruel strife went on.
Slaughter and outrage were
everyday events. Trade was brought to a standstill and hard times were
everywhere, for the fields between the two towns being a daily
battle-ground were left untilled. The farmer’s horse was commandeered
for Morton’s troopers or yoked to his lumbering artillery. Kirkcaldy
defended the Castle with the utmost courage and skill, and was so
confident in his ability to hold out for any length of time against Morton
alone that he indulged in a "rowstie ryme "—that is, a rude
ballad—in which he mocked the attempts of his enemies to drive him from
his stronghold—
"When they have lost as
mony teeth
As they did at the siege of Leith,
They will be fain to leave it."
But Kirkcaldy in his plans
of defence had taken no account of the fact that, just as at the siege of
Leith in 1560, Morton might be aided by a force from England; and this was
what happened, for Queen Elizabeth, anxious for the success of the
Protestant cause, sent a siege train to Leith by sea and an army under Sir
William Drury from Berwick. They encamped by the Links in the
neighbourhood of Bernard Street, perhaps at a spot which appears in local
records six months later as Little London, seemingly for no other reason
than this association with Drury’s men. What Morton failed to do,
treachery within the Castle and the English guns without accomplished in
May 1573, when Kirkcaldy and Lethington surrendered to Sir William Drury
on condition that their lives would be spared. They were afterwards
brought to the English camp at Leith. Lethington died in the Leith
tolbooth, but whether from disease or by his own hand or those of his
enemies has never been quite determined. Kirkcaldy, by Elizabeth’s
orders, and to the shame and grief of Drury who afterwards resigned his
command, was surrendered to the tender mercies of the ruthless Morton and
the burgesses of Edinburgh who had suffered so much at his hands. He was
condemned to the ignominious death of hanging.
In his day of trouble
Kirkcaldy’s thoughts turned to his old friend David Lindsay, the
much-esteemed minister of South Leith. When Knox was dying he had sent
David Lindsay to warn Kirkcaldy, for the love he bore him, that he was
fighting, not only in a losing cause, but in one that would bring shame
and disaster to himself. That prophecy was now about to be fulfilled, for
Kirkcaldy was hanged at the Cross two months after his surrender of the
Castle, the faithful David Lindsay standing by him to the end. By such
shameful death died the gallant Kirkcaldy of Grange, the greatest Scots
soldier of his day, and the last hope in Scotland of the cause of Queen
Mary, who wept bitterly in her English prison when the Earl of Shrewsbury,
with unkindly intent, told her the ill news of his death. The Laird of
Restalrig, though condemned to die also, was afterwards set free, but on
the same scaffold with Kirkcaldy was hanged another of the Castilians, as
they were called, James Mossman, Queen Mary’s goldsmith, whose initials
and coat-of-arms, with other interesting carved stonework, still adorn his
ancient booth in the High Street—now John Knox’s House. Mossman’s
descendants of the same name are still goldsmiths in Edinburgh, as one may
see from the name over the doorway of the jeweller’s shop at 134 Princes
Street.
The regent Morton and the
king’s men, driven to Leith by the Castle guns, now returned to their
ruined houses in the city. These they repaired or rebuilt, and in Fountain
Close, immediately opposite John Knox’s House, are to be seen the two
carved lintels with the inscription VINCIT VERITAS—that is, The truth
conquers—and other pious legends which Adam Fullarton placed over
his doorways in 1573 in celebration of his party’s triumph. And now
Leith was to be free from the cruel experience of war in her midst for the
next seventy years, but companies of armed men embarking at the Shore of
Leith for service abroad was to be a familiar sight for many years to
come.
The ordinary rank and file
of the Castilians were set free, says a contemporary chronicler, on
condition that they enlisted for service in the Netherlands, where the
Duke of Alva and the other merciless lieutenants of the bigoted Philip II.
of Spain were oppressing Catholics and Protestants alike, but especially
the latter. The fall of Edinburgh Castle and the end of the Civil War had
deprived many soldiers, both king’s men and queen’s men, of
employment. Owing to the dearth of food the Government ordered that all
idle men and soldiers were to quit the city and might pass to the wars in
Flanders, where they were soon to be found fighting side by side with the
Netherlanders against their Spanish oppressors. Few ever saw their native
land again, for the ferocious Spaniards gave no quarter to those who fell
into their hands, but their memory can never die so long as Scots maidens
sing the fine old ballad with its beautifully pathetic refrain, "The
Lowlands of Holland hae twined my love and me."
There is one other incident
associating the name of the much-hated regent Morton with Leith. His
policy as regent was much opposed by many of the leading nobles, but in
1578 a reconciliation was effected, when Morton and his chief opponents,
including the Earls of Argyll, Montrose, Arran, and Boyd, celebrated the
event by dining jovially at a hostelry in Leith kept by one William Cant.
There had been Cants in Leith, mostly sailormen, for many generations.
Cant’s Ordinary or Hostelry is supposed to have been the quaint old
building raised on pillared arches which for centuries stood in the
Kirkgate at the head, of Combe’s Close. The site of this ancient place
of entertainment is now fittingly occupied by Kinnaird’s Restaurant. The
ceiling of Mr. Kinnaird’s shop is a facsimile of the decorated plaster
ceiling of the so-called Queen Mary room of its ancient predecessor, whose
outline in carved stonework may be seen on an ornamental panel in front of
the new building.
The house with its gable to
the street immediately to the left of the supposed Cant’s Ordinary, and
demolished at the same time as that ancient hostelry, was for centuries
the property of a family named Kay. Here, or in its predecessor on the
same site, in the reign of James VI., dwelt William Kay, mariner.
A noted interest attaches
to this old Leith sailorman, for his descendants are actively engaged in
the commercial life of the Port to-day. In every generation of this
family, from William Kay’s time until now, one or more members always
seem to have followed a sea-faring life. Robert Kay was a shipmaster in
1739. William Kay was chief mate of the sloop Culloden in 1787,
when he was exempted from capture by the Press Gang, which, during the
American and Napoleonic wars, periodically raided the Port from the
warships in the Roads. It was from Leith aboard one of the warships in the
Forth, although he was not a Leith man, that "Admiral" Parker,
the leader of the mutiny at the Nore in 1797, enlisted in the navy.
Another member of the Kay family was captain of the Happy Janet which
brought Mons Meg from the Tower of London to Leith in 1829, when the whole
town poured out to welcome the great "bombard" just as it had
done some four hundred years before when she was unshipped on the Shore
from Flanders. A great-grandson of the commander of the Happy Janet is
an officer aboard a Leith steamer to-day.
When the fleet of James 1V.
sailed to France in 1513 one of the ‘ blue jackets" aboard the Great
Michael was a shipwright named John Kay. If this sailorman was of the
same stock as William Kay, near neighbour to the host of Cant’s Ordinary
in 160], then we have in Leith to-day members of a family that has the
proud, and surely unique, distinction of having been associated with the
shipping of the Port from the heroic age of the Bartons and Sir Andrew
Wood to our own day, a period of more than four hundred years.
The execution of Queen Mary
in 1587 caused much indignation in Scotland, especially among a section of
the nobles. When the Court went into mourning the young Earl of Bothwell
appeared in a coat of mail, which he declared was the best "dule
weed" for the dead queen. There were other causes of hostility at
this time which mischief-makers made the most of to stir up strife between
the two peoples. The English ambassador, when he once more dared show
himself in Edinburgh after Queen Mary’s execution, reported to Queen
Elizabeth that the acts of piracy on the part of English seamen against
Scottish ships were more numerous than in time of open war, and were so
much resented that they were made use of to inflame the minds of the
people against England. An English pirate cruised off the May Island and
despoiled many ships entering the Firth. She was reported to belong to Sir
Humphrey Gilbert, but that could not possibly have been true, for the
gallant Elizabethan sailor had set out on what was to prove his last
voyage just a month before, taking with him all the ships he could muster.
Behind the May had always been a favourite lurking-place for English
pirates.
In 1587 Edinburgh
commissioned and equipped one of Leith’s largest ships to "pass
upon the Inglis pyrats" haunting this quarter, but with what success
does not appear. "But it so happened in God’s pleasure," so we
are told after the pious manner of the time, that the English pirates did
not always have it their own way, for George Pantoun, a local skipper, and
his good ship making their way homeward from Danzig to Leith brought a
whole ship’s crew of these rievers with him, most of whom were hanged on
the Sands, which had for long been the customary
place of execution for those who chose to sail under the "Jolly
Roger." Many a bold pirate closed his lawless career on the gibbet on
Leith Sands, where his body continued to hang in chains as a warning, but
seldom, it would seem, as a deterrent, to others. The first notice we have
of the bodies of criminals being suspended in chains in Scotland is in
1551, when John Davidson was first hanged and then hung in chains on the
Sands of Leith "for the violent piracy of a French ship of
Bordeaux."
But now the Scots and
English were to lay aside their mutual hostility for a time in face of a
common danger. This was the invasion of the Spanish Armada, perhaps the
best-known fact in British history. Even the pirates were received into
favour when they came to guard against the approach of the Spanish
galleons; for had England gone down before the might of Spain, the
subjugation of Scotland must have followed immediately thereafter. The
merchants of Edinburgh and the sailormen of Leith had much cause to fear
and hate the Spaniard. Their chief trade was with the Netherlands, and it
had suffered greatly through the confused and unsettled state of those
provinces, owing to the cruel oppression of their Spanish rulers.
Some of the more lawless
Scots nobles like the Earl of Huntly, the slayer of the "Bonnie Earl
of Moray," and perhaps the plotting Logan of Restalrig, were quite
ready to join Philip in an invasion of England, or even to turn against
their own country to avenge Queen Mary’s death. Spies in the interests
of Spain frequently came and went through the Port of Leith between Philip
and these Scots sympathizers. One of these spies, Colonel William Semple,
a member of an old Scots family who had fought on the side of Spain
against Holland, took up his lodging in Leith in the summer of 1588,
nominally as an envoy from the Prince of Parma to King James, but really
to negotiate with Huntly in the interests of Spain.
On August 8th, the very day
on which the Great Armada was being driven in disastrous rout before the
English "sea-dogs," a Spanish warship with some two hundred men
aboard anchored off the Port and sent a boat ashore with sixteen men,
bearing dispatches from Parma to Colonel Semple. But Sir John Carmichael,
the Captain of the King’s Guard, was too clever for them. He not only
arrested the crew of the Spanish boat, but at the same time captured
Semple and all Parma’s dispatches. King James, with beating of drums and
the ringing of the alarm bell in the Tolbooth, commanded the men of Leith
to hold themselves in readiness to oppose any further attempts of the
Spaniards to send men ashore.
Huntly advised Parma to
invade England through Leith, which he could then hold as a postern giving
easy entrance into England; but the ships of the "Beggars of the
Sea" kept Parma shut up in the Netherlands. The danger to Scotland
from Spain was therefore very real and very great. The result was a treaty
for mutual defence between King James and Queen Elizabeth, and Scotland’s
fighting men were ordered to hold themselves in readiness to muster on
Leith Links to repel the invader should he succeed in landing. Watchers
were posted round the coast, and the balefires were to be lit on the first
alarm.
Terrible was the
consternation and fear in Leith and Edinburgh when it was known that
"that monstrous navie was about our costes." As in the Great
War, lying rumour brought in many false alarms. Now the Spaniards, like
the Germans, had landed at Dunbar, now at St. Andrews, and now somewhere
in the north. It was not until a month after the Armada had left Spain
that it was known to be in full flight round our shores, little better
than so many storm-shattered hulks, four of which came to grief on the
coast of Mull. The shipwrecked crews of these vessels, some seven hundred
all told, "for the maist pairt young berdless men, trauchled and
hungered," and utterly wretched, were all that the people of Leith
saw of the Spanish Armada, for from the Shore, after being kindly treated,
they were shipped over to the Duke of Parma in Flanders.
The fear and alarm with
which the Leithers awaited the approach of the Armada were now changed to
thankful prayers and joyful songs. In common with the people throughout
England and the greater part of Scotland, the Leithers gathered in their
two parish churches and poured forth their gratitude to God for His
goodness and mercy. This was done in both countries in the words of the
76th Psalm, which celebrates Israel’s miraculous deliverance from King
Sennacherib and his Assyrian host.
A Scottish poet,
calling upon his countrymen to celebrate with rejoicing so signal a
deliverance, said,—
"Expose your gold and shyning
silver bright
On covered cupboards set in open
sight."
Such
a cupboard or open sideboard with stuccoed decoration still survives in
what was once the dining-room of Andrew Lamb’s house in Water’s Close,
where Mary spent the first day on her unexpected arrival from France.
Of all the carved stones of Leith, that
which above all others engages our interest and excites our curiosity is
the upper of the two panels built into the wall of the house immediately
opposite the head of St. Andrew’s Square in the Main Street of Newhaven.
The sculptures on the lower panel are similar to those on the south wing
of the Trinity House in the Kirk-gate. They are the heraldic arms of the
Mariners’ Incorporation of the Trinity House, and at one time must have
adorned some of their property in the neighbourhood of Newhaven. How old
this stone may be there is no date to show, but that the arms themselves
must have been adopted over two hundred and fifty years ago the carvings
on the stones themselves indicate, for, instead of the sextant, the shield
bears its predecessor, the cross-staff, which has been obsolete since the
time of William of Orange.
It is the upper and more
ancient of the two panels, however, which specially arrests our attention,
for it bears, carved in curious fashion, the ever-memorable date 1588, the
year of the destruction of the Great Armada.
Beneath this date is
sculptured a sixteenth-century ship with the flag of St. Andrew. Scotland’s
naval ensign before the Union of 1707, flying from each masthead. Beneath
all, in capital letters, is the legend, "In the Neam of God."
The ship sculptured here much resembles the model now in the Royal
Scottish Museum of the Yellow Carve!, that gallant old ship of Sir
Andrew Wood.
Is
it only a remarkable coincidence that this stone should bear so
significant a date, or is there some connection between it and the rout
and ruin of the vaunted Invincible Armada? Does it not seem as if the
people of Newhaven wished to have some permanent memorial to remind them
and those who came after them of God’s signal mercy and goodness in so
great a time of peril? If any of their number had been refugees from the
hated tyranny and cruel persecution of the Spaniards, we can well
understand the gratitude that led them to erect this memorial for their
second escape from the terrors of the Spanish Fury and the cruelty of the
pitiless Spanish oppressor.
The year following the
destruction of the Spanish Armada saw another royal princess set sail from
her native land to become a Scottish queen. This was Anne of Denmark, who
was married to James VI. in 1589. On setting forth on her voyage her ship
was so tempest-tossed and driven out of her course that she had to seek
shelter in Christiania Harbour, where she remained all through the winter.
James, becoming impatient at her non-arrival, sailed to Norway to bring
her home, and the royal pair were married at Christiania by David Lindsay
of South Leith, who had accompanied King James overseas, because he was
"the minister whom the Court liked best." They set sail from
Norway in the ship of Captain John Dick, whose only son, Sir William Dick
of Braid, afterwards became a wealthy Edinburgh merchant prince and
Covenanter, and Provost of the city.
On their arrival in Leith
in May of the following year the whole town gathered on the Shore and Long
Sands to welcome them, just as they did eleven years later when James
crossed the Forth to Edinburgh after his escape from Gowrie House. A
thanksgiving service for their safe arrival was held in St. Mary’s Kirk.
As Holyrood was not yet ready for their reception, they stayed for six
days at the King’s Wark with the father of Bernard Lindsay, and then
they passed on to Holyrood, the queen and her ladies riding in a coach
drawn by eight great horses of her own, all richly caparisoned. The
members of the trade incorporations, all armed as if for war, lined both
sides of the way to the bounds of the town, when the duty was taken up by
the men of Edinburgh and the Canongate.
James and his loving
subjects had good reason, so he and they at least believed, to be thankful
for his safe arrival from overseas, for it was discovered from a maid
suspected of witchcraft that the storms which had so beset his homeward
voyage had been the malignant work of witches, who wished to drown both
him and his young queen. These witches had met at the Fairy Holes, near
Newhaven, and then, sailing out to Leith Roads in riddles, had raised the
storms by means of a christened cat which was given them by Satan himself.
All these absurdities were most solemnly believed by both king and people,
and a number of so-called witches were first strangled and then their
bodies were burnt to ashes for their supposed share in so wicked a plot.
Such absurd beliefs show us
how superstitious the people of Edinburgh and Leith were in those days;
and, indeed, right down almost to the close of the eighteenth century many
firmly believed in witchcraft. The place of execution for witches in Leith
was the Gallow Lee, once a small hill at Leith Walk Station, of which a
part still survives under the name of Shrub Hill. Here in 1664 nine
witches, who were first mercifully strangled, had their bodies burnt to
ashes; and in 1678 five more met a similar fate. The witch burning in
Leith after James’s voyage from Norway has been made the subject of a
long ballad by Robert Buchanan, entitled The Lights o’ Leith, of
which two verses are quoted below—
"‘The
lights o’ Leith ! the lights o’ Leith !’
The skipper cried aloud—
While the wintry gale with snow and hail
Blew snell thro’ sail and shroud.
"High up on the quay
blaze the balefires, and see!
Three stakes are deep set in the ground,
To each stake smear’d with pitch clings the corpse of a witch,
With the fire flaming redly around !"