On Trinity Sunday the
17th of May, at two o’clock in the afternoon, the five batteries opened
a simultaneous discharge upon the walls of the castle. Bravely and
briskly its cannoneers replied to them, and deep-mouthed Mons Meg, with
her vast bullets of black whin, the thundering carthouns, basilisks,
serpents, and culverins, amid fire and smoke, belched their missiles
from the old gray towers, showering balls of iron, lead, and stone at
the batteries; while the incessant ringing of several thousand
harquebusses, calivers, and wheel-lock petronels, added to the din of
the double cannonade. From the calibre of the great Mons Meg, which yet
frowns en barbe over the ramparts, one may easily imagine the dismay her
enormous bullets must have caused in the trenches so far below her.
For ten days the furious cannonade continued, on both sides, without a
moment’s cessation. On the 19th, three towers were demolished, and
enormous gaps appeared in the curtain walls; many of the castle guns
were dismounted, and destroyed by the falling of the ancient masonry: a
shot struck one of the largest culverins fairly on the muzzle,
shattering it to pieces, and scattering the splinters around those who
stood near. A very-heavy battery was discharged against King David’s
Tower, a great square bastel-house, the walls of which were dark with
the lapse of four centuries. On the 23d a great gap had been beaten in
its northern side, revealing the arched hall within; and as the vast old
tower, with its cannon, its steel-clad defenders, and the red flag of
defiance still waving above its machicolated bartizan, sank with a
mighty crash to shapeless ruin, the wild shriek raised by the females in
the castle, and the roar of the masonry rolling like thunder down the
perpendicular rocks, were distinctly heard at the distant English camp.1
Next day the round tower of the Constable fell down in masses from the
half cliff on which its rugged front had for ages faced the storms of
war and of the elements.
Then Wallace’s Tower, the great curtain to the eastward, with its six
gross-culverins, the strong gate-tower, with its portcullis and
harriers, all fell crashing down in succession, burying the living and
the dead, laying hare the steep rocks, and choking with lime, stones,
and rubbish the deep draw-wells, one of which had already dried up.
Their loss added greatly to the accumulating miseries of the besieged,
who were without other water than the summer dews which descended by
night on their unsheltered heads, and on the bloodstained ruins of the
stronghold they were so bravely defending.
Kirkaldy never for a moment left the walls, either by day or by night.
His cannon were now becoming rapidly silenced, and his ranks thinned by
wounds and death; hut his soldiers still continued to make u great
slaughter among the English cannoneers, sundry of whom had their legs
and arms torn from their bodies and whirled into the air, by violence of
the great shot.” The cannoneers of Berwick worked their culverinswith
great intrepidity, being told by their captains that, until the brave
band of Kirkaldy was subdued, the influence of their queen in Scotland
was insecure, and that she was resolved, as her secretary Walsingham
expressed it, "to pull the garrison out by the ears.” Sir William
Drury’s battery was only fifty yards distant from the western walls and
St Margaret’s Tower, from which so sharp a fire was poured upon it that
his gunners forsook their cannon in disorder, but were rallied by his
example, when, taking a match, he discharged the five pieces with his
own hand. Animated by courage, patriotism, and revenge, rather than by
terror or despair, Kirkaldy defended himself with the most resolute
bravery, amid dead and dying soldiers, falling towers, and failing
camion, without water, and without provisions, of which the demolition
of the storehouses had deprived him.
Captains Hume and Crauford of Jordanhill, two leaders of the regent’s
Scottish companies, headed their pikemen and a band of English in an
escalade. A dull old ballad, the Sege of the Castell,* says—
“That Hume and Craford to the lave were gyde,
With certain soiours (i. e. soldiers) of the garysoune;
Four Captanis followit at their back to byde,
Semphill and Hector, Ramsay and Robesoune.”
They advanced to storm the Spur at seven o’clock on the morning of the
26th, while their allies made an attack to the westward, and
disconcerted the measures of the garrison, whose strength ought to have
been ten times greater for the perfect defence of such a fortress.
Though an outwork of great strength, in the form of a halfmoon, the Spur
was poorly manned, and a desperate hand-to-hand conflict ensued for
three hours; but by ten o’clock the ravelin was stormed, with the loss
of eight men killed and twenty-eight wounded—for corslets, and morions
of proof, were a great defence against sword-blades and pike-heads. The
standard of James VI. was immediately hoisted upon it. Sir Francis
Russel, an English knight who betrayed marked cowardice in the assault,
was, in consequence, afterwards sent under arrest to Berwick.
The steep and rugged mass of black whinstone on which the castle stands,
defied all attempts at an escalade. Rising in many parts, almost
perpendicularly, to the height of three hundred feet, with massive
though ruined walls, defended hy brave soldiers, whose inherent courage,
the dawning of despair, love of life, and dread of an ignominious death,
and the thought of having their wives and little ones to defend from the
lusts and swords of an infuriated enemy, had altogether endued with a
determined ferocity that seemed to border on martial insanity. To time,
starvation, misery, and death, Drury and Morton trusted for a
surrender—a successful assault could not be thought of. The attack of
the English on the westward, though favouring the stormers of the Spur,
proved otherwise futile ; they were repulsed, leaving thirty of their
best men dead among the rocks.
The greatest privation of the besieged was caused by the loss of their
wells, and the sufferings of the wounded were greatly increased by the
want of water. A small supply was obtained by lowering a soldier over
the frightful precipice to the north, with a cord long enough to enable
him to reach St Margaret’s well, far down beneath the lower
fortifications. Favoured by the darkness and his own daring, he made
several such perilous visits, which were soon discovered by the
besiegers—who, to their infamy, poisoned the well, thereafter permitting
the bold water-carrier to be lowered down by his unsuspecting comrades,
and to be drawn up unmolested with his vessel filled with the drugged
liquid. Some authors accuse Morton, and others Drury, of committing this
piece of savage barbarity; but its consequences were soon fearfully
visible among the little band of braves. Many whom the shot had left
unscathed, expired in the greatest agonies that poison can produce;
while the rest became feeble, sickly, and totally unfitted for working
their ponderous cannon, and manning in complete armour, by day and
night, the exposed and crumbling walls. A scarcity of provisions
increased the horrors which were thickening fast around them; and Lady
Kirkaldy, who appears to have taken charge of their little store, was
accused by the soldiers of “skanting the victuals, which were skant
eneugh alreadie.” Maddened by the miseries they underwent, and rendered
desperate by all hopes of escape from torture and death being utterly
cut off, a frenzy seized the soldiers ; they broke into a dangerous
mutiny, and threatened to hang Lethington over the walls, as being the
primary cause of all these dangers, from the great influence he
exercised over Kirkaldy their governor. But even now, when amid the
sick, the dying, the dead, and the mutinous—surrounded by crumbling
ramparts and dismounted cannon, among which the shot of the besiegers
were rebounding every instant—with the lives, honour, and safety of his
wife, his brother, and numerous brave and faithful friends, depending on
his efforts and example, the heart of the brave governor appears never
to have quailed even for an instant!
On beholding certain movements in the trenches, and perceiving by the
arrayal of the different divisions beneath their several standards, that
his foe, the unrelenting Morton, exulting in the near prospect of laying
hands upon his victims, was about to lead the Scottish bands to a
general assault, by the great breach in the eastern wall— which, in the
mutinous and sickly state of the weakened garrison, could now never he
defended—Kirkaldy, with sensations which may easily be imagined,
presented himself above the shattered ruins of the gate-tower, bearing a
white rod in his hand in token of peace, while his drums heat a chamade
in sign of parley. An English cavalier went up within speaking distance,
to whom he expressed a wish to converse “ with his old friend and
fellow-soldier the marshal of Berwick.” This was on the afternoon of the
28th May.
Morton consented, and thereupon Kirkaldy and his uncle, Sir Kobert
Melville of Murdocairnie, were lowered over the ruins by cords, as there
was no other mode of egress, the flight of forty steps being completely
buried in the same ruin which had choked up the archways, and hidden
both gates and portcullis. The Castle-liill at that time (says Melville
of Kilrenny, in his Diary) was covered with stones, “rinning like a
sandie bray", but behind the breaches were the men-at-arms drawn up in
firm array, with their pikes and helmets gleaming in the setting sun.
In the dusk the meeting with Drury took place, near the battery or
bulwark in the Lawnmarket. The English knight courteously extolled the
bravery of Kirkaldy, but advised him u to surrender, as it was
impossible for him to receive the least assistance, either from France
or Spain, the whole coast being vigilantly watched.” The unfortunate
soldier, in the same tone of courtesy, acknowledged the value of his
advice, and obtained an armistice for twenty-four hours, preparatory to
a capitulation. Another meeting immediately took place between Kirkaldy
and Sir Robert, on their own part, Killigrew and Drury for the queen of
England, and Lord Boyd for the regent.
Kirkaldy’s requests were to have surety for their lives and lands, and
that they should not be pillaged of any property they had within the
castle; to have leave for Lord Home and William Maitland of Lethington
to retire into England, and he (Kirkaldy) to be permitted to reside
unmolested on his estates in Fifeshire. These conditions, which his
valour so richly merited, Drury—who was altogether indifferent about the
matter—might have agreed to, but Morton rejected them with undisguised
scorn. He had in his own possession the whole barony of Grange, and the
only terms he would grant were these:—
That if the soldiers marched forth without their armour, and submitted
to his clemency, he would grant them their lives ; but there were ten
persons who must yield unconditionally to him, and whose fate he would
leave to the decision of their umpire, Elizabeth. The unfortunate
exceptions were—the governor, Sir James Kirkaldy, Lethington, Alexander
lord Home, the Bishop of Dun-keld, Sir Robert Melville of Murdocaimie,
Logan of Restalrig, Alexander Crichton of Drylaw, Pitarrow the
constable, and Patrick Wishart.
Convinced by this stern and dubious answer of their ultimate doom, they
refused to capitulate on such terms ; and the governor returned once
more to his ruined hold, and, with a courage now gathering fresh energy
from desperation, he undertook to defend it by standing in the breach of
the eastern curtain, with eight knights whose rash valour was equal to
his own. Among these were his brother, Lord Home, his kinsmen the
Melvilles —Sir Robert, and Sir Andrew of Garvock, master of the
household to Queen Mary—the Constable Pitarrow, and Patrick Wishart his
brother. While those brave men were resolving thus, and arming, Robert
Colville, laird of Cleish, and Mathew his brother, approached the
breach, under pretext of making fresh offers, but in reality to examine
the state of the ruins, and secretly to tamper with the soldiers, which
they did so successfully that several deserted, and escaped down the
rocks.
The undaunted example of Kirkaldy now completely failed to animate his
sickly, famished, and diminished band, who threatened, unless he
capitulated in six hours, to hang his friend Lethington from the walls
by a cord, and to deliver himself up to Morton. Thus stood matters on
the expiry of the two days’ truce. In this dreadful dilemma, menaced
without and within, there remained but two alternatives—to surrender, or
to die by his own sword.
The English captains were very anxious that the castle should be
delivered to them in form; but Kirkaldy, who possessed all the
enthusiasm of a true Scotsman, could not brook the humiliation of
surrendering the citadel of his native capital to Englishmen, the
ancient hereditary foes of his country. Therefore, when compelled to
adopt the expedient (which is supposed to have originated in
Lethington’s fertile brain) of admitting a party of the besiegers within
the outworks, or at least close to the walls, he sent privately in the
night a message to Hume and Jordanhill, to march their Scottish
companies between the English batteries and the fortress, lest the old
bands of Drury should have the honour of entering first.
On the next morning, the 29th of May he came forth and gave up his sword
calmly, to the Marshal of Berwick, (rather than yield it to the hated
Morton,) and on thus personally surrendering, received the most solemn
assurances of being restored to his estates and liberty at the
intercession of the Queen of England. In the name of his mistress, Drury
pledged word for the safety of his adherents; and immediately the
survivors of the siege, embracing only about one hundred soldiers,
marched from the silent and desolate ruins, where the blood and the
corpses of their comrades, and a chaos of stones and broken culverins,
attested the fury of the siege and the energy of the defence. Clad in
then* armour, girt with their swords and bandoliers, and with their old
banner displayed, they marched through the barricaded streets of the
city, escorted by a guard of Morton’s harquebussiers, to protect them
from the animosity of the exasperated burghers, who had not forgotten
the conflagration of the Portsburgh, and the incessant cannonading they
had endured for six months past. The whole of the prisoners were
supposed to be under the charge of the English ambassador, and for
several days they were all at liberty on parole.
Drury conducted Sir William and Lady Kirkaldy, with other ladies and
gentlemen of distinction, to his temporary residence, where, like a
brave English knight, (notwithstanding Morton’s remonstrances,) he
treated them with the kindness and courtesy their sufferings and
constancy deserved. The resentful regent was determined not to be
cheated of the blood he had thirsted for so long, and wrote instantly to
Lord Burleigh, warning him that the “authors of all the mischief” were
now unconditionally in the hands of Elizabeth’s ambassador; he therefore
requested that they might be delivered up to him, to receive the reward
of their crimes. The barbarous Killigrew urged their immediate execution
; but Drury, who, as a soldier, possessed more generosity, rejected the
advice of the cold-blooded politician, and anxiously awaited his next
despatches from London.
Meanwhile the castle had been taken possession of by Morton’s Scottish
companies, and his brother, Sir George Douglas of Tods’ Holes and
Parkhead, was appointed successor to Kirkaldy. This savage knight, who
was popularly known as “ George the Postulate of Aber-brothwick,” was
one of the slayers of Rizzio, into whose spine he wedged his long dagger
with such force that it could not be withdrawn without violence. He was
a natural son of the Earl of Angus, and, consequently, uncle of Darnley.
He immediately commenced the restoration of the ruined fortress, and
some of its present batteries are the result of his exertions.
The regalia of Scotland, the crown, sword, and sceptre, with many
valuable private andcrown-jewels, were found in Kirkaldy’s own
apartment. They were all contained in a great oak chest, probably the
same which is yet preserved in the crown-room. Many letters in cipher
were also discovered, but the prudent Maitland committed all his papers
to the flames before the capitulation.
Many of the English cavaliers, and officers of the old bands of Berwick,
ascended into the castle by the great breach in the eastern wall, which
they were fond of passing and repassing, that they might on their return
boast “they had won the maiden castle.” But after the appointment of the
stem Douglas to the governorship, the Scottish companies would not
permit their allies—of whom, no doubt, they were sufficiently jealous—to
enter in any great number.
By a computation made by the Marshal of Berwick, it appears that not
less than three thousand cannon-balls were discharged against the
castle, between the 17th and 29th of May, inclusive. The most of these
were recovered, says the Marshal, by paying “the Scottish people a piece
of their coin called a bawbee for every bullet, which is in value
English one penny and a quarter.” The cannonade must have averaged fully
two hundred and thirty rounds for each of the thirteen days, which, all
things considered, was veiy good gunnery.
Kirkaldy and Maitland, though prisoners at large in Drury’s temporary
residence, on learning the purport of Morton’s communications with
Elizabeth, became alarmed for their safety, and intreated Killigrew the
ambassador to remove them to England. But Master Killigrew knew too well
the wishes and intentions of his queen towards them, and continued to
urge their immediate execution. In a letter to Lord Burleigh, they
condescended to acknowledge that he might blame their obstinate
resistance to Morton ; hut promised in future to he obedient to his
mistress, and hoped they might become useful if permitted to enter her
service—now that every hope of residing in Scotland had passed away.
Their doubts and dangers were increasing fast. With this loyal soldier
of Mary, nothing hut the disgrace ancK horror with which he contemplated
a public and ignominious execution, under Morton’s eye, could have made
him affix his name to so humble an appeal as the following, which was no
doubt penned and conceived by Maitland, and which I quote from Tytler’s
History:—
“My Lord,—The malice of our enemies is the more increased against us,
that they have seen us rendered unto the queen’s majesty’s will, and now
seeking refuge at her highness’s hands; and, therefore, we doubt not hut
they will go about by all possible means to procure our mischief; yea,
that their cruel minds will lead them to crave our blood at her
majesty’s hands. But whatsoever their malice he, we cannot fear that it
shall have success, knowing with how gracious a princess we have to do,
who hath given so many good proofs to the world of her clemency and mild
nature (?) that we cannot mistrust that the first example of the
contrary shall be shown upon us. We take this to be her very natural
parcere subjectis et debellare superbos.
“We have rendered ourselves unto her majesty, which to our own
countrymen we would never have done in any extremity that might come. We
trust her majesty will not put us out of her hands, to make any others
(especially our mortal enemies) our masters. If it will please her
majesty to extend her most gracious clemency towards us, she may be
assured to have us perpetually at her devotion as any of this
nation—yea, as any subject of her own—for now with honour we may oblige
ourselves to her majesty farther than we might before, and her majesty’s
benefit will bind us to her perpetually.
“Your lordship knoweth what our request is, we pray your lordship to
further it.
“There never was a time wherein your lordship’s friendship might stand
us in such stead. As we have oftentimes before tasted thereof, so we
humbly pray you will not let it inlack us now, in time of this our
greatest misery. Let not the mis-reports of our enemies prevail against
us. When we are in her majesty’s hands, she may make of us what pleaseth
her.
“From Edinburgh, 1st of June, 1573.”
Considering the subtle statesman and noble warrior from whom this artful
letter came, a painful air of humility pervades it, which probably
nothing but the cause before mentioned, together with the intense
mortification of finding themselves at the mercy of Morton—he whom they
detested and abhorred—could ever have drawn from Maitland of Lethington
and Kirkaldy of Grange.
Notwithstanding its earnestness, it was productive of no effect.
Elizabeth, though naturally cruel and enraged against the champions of
Mary, did not immediately decide ; hut the Earl of Morton, and Killigrew
her ambassador, so strongly and vehemently advised their execution, that
she ordered her general to deliver them up to the former to he treated
as he pleased, an order which she knew was equivalent to signing their
death-warrant. Morton had delivered up the unhappy Northumberland to her
insatiable vengeance and pride; and could she be less liberal in infamy?
Drury, who now pitied the fallen state of Kirkaldy, and respected his
valour and worth, must have experienced deep mortification on receiving
this final and fatal order from one he dared not disobey, and in
obedience to whom he placed Sir William, Lady Kirkaldy, and the whole of
the prisoners, noble and of humbler rank, in all one hundred and
sixty-four men, thirty-four women, and ten hoys, in the hands of the
exulting and triumphant regent, who by some means had previously secured
Sir James Kirkaldy in fetters and a dungeon.2 As a gloomy earnest of
what their superiors were to expect, the whole of the private soldiers
were thrown into the vaults of Craigmillar, Merchiston, and Blackness.
Sir William Kirkaldy was committed to the palace of Holyrood, where a
hand of Morton’s men guarded him day and night.
Lord Home was committed to the castle of Edinburgh, where he remained
till the hour of his death. Carte, from Fenelon’s despatches, relates
that Home paid Morton £10,000 to be put in possession of bis patrimonial
fortresses of Fastcastle and Home; but the regent took the money with
admirable coolness, and troubled himself no further in the matter. Home
died in August 1575.
The bishop of Dunkcld was sent to Blackness ; John Maitland, the prior
of Coldingham, to the castle of Tantallon, where he remained until 1584
; his brother, the secretary, to the ancient Tolbooth of Leith. Sir
James Kirkaldy, with Mossman and Cockie, two goldsmiths of Edinburgh,
who had coined money in the castle by the governor’s order, were placed
in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh. Sir Robert Melville of Murdocairnie was
sent to the castle of Lethington, in charge of David Hume of Fishwick,
its captain. His life was spared at the intercession of his brother, Sir
James of Halhill, and by the interest of Killigrew. Alexander Crichton
of Drylaw was afterwards liberated. Morton dared not proceed against the
life of Lord Home, who was chief of a bold mosstrooping clan; and the
threats of his vassals, the Laird of Manderstone, the Knight of
Cowdenknowes, the Goodman of North Berwick, and other Homes, were not to
be trifled with. The faithful Sir Andrew Melville of Garvock, was also
spared, and lived to attend Mary at the scaffold in Fotheringay, fifteen
years after. Of the ultimate fate of Lady Kirkaldy, and the other noble
dames who were with her, few notices can be discovered; but none
suffered either death or imprisonment.*
Immediately on giving over his prisoners, Sir William Drury, with all
his forces and artillery, marched back to Berwick, leaving these, the
last of the unfortunate loyalists, utterly at the mercy of Morton. He
complained bitterly that this breach of faith and lack of charity on the
part of his sovereign had covered him with shame and dishonour, and
compelled him to act so inconsistently with his feelings and profession;
but the Scots, who in those days were never inclined to think very
favourably of an Englishman, loudly accused him of the vilest duplicity.
Morton at the same time exclaimed against him, for having promised
conditions of peace to Kirkaldy of Grange and his friends, expressly
against the first article of the convention of Lamberton, which provided
that neither of them should transact or compound with the besieged
without the consent of the other. It is considered certain that Drury
acquainted him, on the 29th of May, with the conditions on which
Kirkaldy and his soldiers capitulated. Morton, being intently resolved
on their destruction, cared little what the public thought.
Victorious at home, and supported abroad by his powerful ally Elizabeth,
he determined to give full scope to his tyrannical disposition, and his
grand ruling passions of avarice and revenge. Of those whom fate and the
fortune of war had placed so completely at his mercy, he was not long in
disposing.
William Maitland of Lethington, by swallowing poison, escaped the
ignominious death he anticipated, and to which he would assuredly have
been brought by Morton, whom some writers have accused of administering
the potion; but it is much more probable that the stem regent would have
reserved him for the shame of those judicial shambles which awaited his
brethren in misfortune. .Resolved, however, not to he cheated of his
prey, the moment he became aware of the desperate deed, he ordered
Lethington to he dragged from the Tolbooth of Leith to his own house in
Edinburgh, where on the 9th of July he expired in great torment.
Something peculiarly ignominious appears to have been intended for his
body, which was allowed to lie so long unburied, “that the vermine came
creeping out under the doore of the hous where he was lying.”
Such was the miserable end of this great and accomplished statesman.
There is yet extant a pathetic letter from his lady, the once famed and
beautiful daughter of Malcolm lord Fleming, praying that his “ poor
remains might suffer no shame,” hut he committed to the tomb. An
original portrait of him is still preserved in the castle of Thirlestane.
Mary Fleming, one of the four Marys of the queen, was his second wife,
and by her he left a son, James, on whose death the line of the family
was carried on by the prior of Coldinghame, who thus became progenitor
of the Duke and Earls of Lauderdale. Mary, the daughter of the
unfortunate secretary, became countess of Robert third earl of Roxburgh.
The estates of Lethington were afterwards restored to the heirs, in
whose favour the ninth parliament of James VI. passed an act in 1584.
After suffering a close confinement in the gloomiest chambers of old
Holyrood, where Morton’s armed vassals kept constant watch and ward, Sir
William Kirkaldy, and his brother Sir James, were brought to trial on
the 3d August. James Mossman and James Cockie, who had served in the
castle of Edinburgh, and coined silver therein in the queen’s name, were
arraigned at the same time, charged with murder, rebellion, and
treasonably defending and withholding a fortress of the king. Pitcairn,
in his scarce and valuable “Criminal Trials,” remarks that, in the case
of Sir William Kirkaldy, “there appears to have been considerable debate
on the relevancy of the indictment on which he was tried”—but he was
soon found guilty of treason against King James by a court overawed hy
the regent, and predisposed to bring in a fatal verdict.
Unfortunately, from the 3d of August 1573, until the close of 1576,
there occurs a blank in the records of the Scottish High Court of
Justiciary, and in consequence the trials of Kirkaldy and his brother
cannot he given at length.
Of the latter’s case the following brief memorandum alone appears, and
no further particulars of it are preserved.
“August 3d.—Mr James Kirkaldye, and James Cockke, goldsmythe, burges of
Edinburgh, dilatit of certane crymes of treasoune committit against our
souerane lord, and his heines auctoritie.” On the margin of the record
appear the words convict, et suspenand from thence is the blank of three
years. |