| |
Kay's Edinburgh
Portraits
Sir James
Stirling, Bart., Lord Provost of Edinburgh |
This gentleman, whose father was a fishmonger at the
head of Marlin's Wynd, had the merit of being the architect of his own
fortune. Marlin's Wynd, which stood east of the Tron Church, was
demolished to make way for the South Bridge. Mr. Stirling had for his
sign a large, clumsy, wooden Black Bull, which is preserved as a
relic in the Museum of the Scottish Antiquaries. In early life he went
to the West Indies, as clerk to an extensive and opulent planter, Mr.
Stirling of Keir, where he conducted himself with such propriety, that,
in a short time, through the influence of his employer, he was appointed
Secretary to the Governor of the Island of Jamaica, Sir Charles Dalling.
Having in this situation accumulated a considerable
sum of money, he at length returned to Edinburgh, and was assumed a
partner in the banking concern of "Mansfield, Rarnsay, & Co." (lately
Ramsay, Bonar, & Co.), whose place of business was then in Cantore's
Close, Luckenbooths. Not long after he had entered into this concern,
Mr. Stirling, naturally of an irritable temperament, became uneasy at
the extent and responsibility of a banking establishment, and proposed
selling his estate of Saughie, which he had recently purchased. Old Mr.
William Ramsay, having been apprised of his intention, addressed him one
day after dinner in his usual familiar manner—"I hear, Jamie, that ye're
gaun to sell the Saughie property. If that be the case, rather than let
you advertise it in the newspapers, and thereby bring suspicion on the
stability of the concern, I'll tak it frae you at what it cost ye."
Stirling instantly agreed to the proposition ; and scarcely had the
property been transferred to Mr. Ramsay when that gentleman had the
offer of nearly double the purchase-money. The value is now more than
quadrupled. In this copartnery he was very prosperous; and his good
fortune was increased by obtaining the hand of Miss Mansfield, the
daughter of the principal partner.
Mr. Stirling first became connected with the Town
Council in 1771, when he was elected one of the Merchant Councillors.
During the years 1773-4, he held the office of Treasurer; and, from 1776
till 1790, was frequently in the magistracy. At the annual election of
the latter year, he was chosen Lord Provost, and held that office during
the city riots of 1702.
At this period politics ran high. The Reform of the
Royal Burghs of Scotland had been keenly agitated throughout the country
forborne time previous; and a motion on the subject, by Mr. Sheridan, in
the House of Commons, on the 18th of April, which was negatived by a
majority of twenty-six, had incensed the public to a great degree. Henry
Dundas Lord Melville, then Principal Secretary of State for the Home
department, by his opposition to the motion, rendered himself so
obnoxious to the people, that in various parts of Scotland he was burnt
in effigy by the mob. The Pitt administration had become unpopular, by a
proclamation, issued at the same time, against certain publications—a
measure which the people viewed as an attack upon the liberty of the
press. In this state of excitement the authorities of Edinburgh
contemplated the approaching King's birth-day on the 4th of June, with
much uneasiness; but the measures of precaution adopted by them were
imprudent, and tended rather to irritate than conciliate the populace.
The disturbances which ensued are thus recorded in the journals of the
day :—
"The Magistrates of Edinburgh, having got information
by anonymous letters and otherwise, that, on the King's birth-day, many
persons who had taken offence at the parliamentary conduct of Mr. Dundas,
in the opposition of the Scottish Burgh Eeform, were determined to burn
his effigy, in imitation of the burghs of Dundee, Aberdeen, &c, in
consequence of this information, they took the opinion of the high
officers of the Crown, with regard to the conduct which it was proper to
pursue, when they resolved to prevent, if possible, the designs of the
populace, by bringing in some troops of dragoons to overawe and
intimidate them. Accordingly, in the afternoon of the King's birth-day
(Monday, 4th June, 1792), the dragoons made their appearance in
Edinburgh, riding furiously through the streets, with their swords
drawn. This behaviour, instead of having the desired effect, provoked
the indignation of the people, who saluted them with hootings and hisses
as they passed along. In the afternoon, when the Magistrates were
assembled in the Parliament House, to drink the usual healths and loyal
toasts, the populace also assembled, and were indulging themselves,
according to a custom which has prevailed in Edinburgh for many years,
in the throwing of dead cats, &c, at one another, and at the city-guard,
who are always drawn up to fire vollies as the healths are drunk by the
Magistrates. At this time some dragoon officers, incautiously appearing
on the streets, were .insulted by the rabble. This induced them to bring
out their men, who were accordingly directed to clear the streets. Some
stones were thrown at them; but at last the mob retired without doing
any material mischief.
"On the evening of the next day, Tuesday, a number of
persons assembled before Mr. Dundas's house in George Square, with a
figure of straw, which they hung upon a pole, and were proceeding to
burn, when two of Mr. Dundas's friends came out from the house, and very
imprudently attempted to disperse the mob by force. Their conduct was
immediately resented. The gentlemen were soon obliged to retire again
into the house; and the mob began to break the windows. Not content with
this, they proceeded to the house of the Lord Advocate (Dundas of
Arniston), whose windows they broke. It then became necessary to bring a
party of the military from the Castle to prevent farther mischief. The
Sheriff attended and read the riot act; but the mob not dispersing,
after repeated intimation of the consequences, the military at last
fired, when several persons were wounded, and some mortally. This put a
period to the outrages for that night.
"On Wednesday, in the evening, the mob assembled in
the New Town, with an intention of destroying the house of the Chief
Magistrate. A fire was lighted on the Castle, and two guns were fired,
as a signal to the marines of the Hind frigate, stationed at
Leith, and the dragoons, quartered about a mile east of the town. On
their appearance the mob finally separated."
During the prevalence of these riots, Provost
Stirling prudently sought shelter in the Castle. In so doing he acted
wisely, as, if the mob had laid hands on him, there is no saying what
might have followed. It was at this time that "Lang Sandy Wood," whom
the crowd mistook for the Provost, narrowly escaped being thrown over
the North Bridge.
The Magistrates, naturally alarmed at what had
occurred, thought it best to lay the whole facts of the case before
their fellow-citizens. With this view, a public meeting of the
inhabitants was called, in the New Church aisle, on the Thursday
forenoon following. The Lord Provost in the chair. Of this meeting the
following account is given in the journals:—
"The Lord Advocate, Mr. Sheriff Pringle, the Lord
President, Lord Adam Gordon, Commander-in-Chief, Mr. Solicitor Blair,
and several others, declared their sentiments. The meeting unanimously
expressed their full approbation of the measures pursued by the
Magistrates and the Sheriff, for suppressing the riots; and published
resolutions to that effect.
"A proclamation was issued the same evening,
recommending to the people not to assemble in crowds, or remain longer
on the streets than their lawful business required, as the most decisive
measures had been resolved upon for quieting the least appearance of any
further disorder; and offering a reward of one hundred guineas for
discovery of the ring-leaders. Fifty guineas were also offered by the
Merchant Company, who, and all the incorporations, voted thanks to the
Magistrates for the measures taken to suppress the riots. It is said,
that certain attempts to procure a vote of thanks to the Magistrates for
introducing the military into the town, -previous to any riotous act,
proved abortive."
Perhaps the zeal
displayed by Provost Stirling, in support of the existing administration
on this occasion, may have recommended him as a suitable object for
ministerial favour; however this may be, on the 17th of July following,
" the King was pleased to grant the dignity of a Baronet of the kingdom
of Great Britain to the Bight Hon. James Stirling, Lord Provost of the
city of Edinburgh, and the heirs-rnale of his body lawfully begotten."
The irritation of the populace against Sir James
gradually subsided; and latterly vented itself entirely in pasquinadoes
and lampoons, in which the humble origin of the Baronet was not spared.
The satirical allusion of a second Print will be best
understood by reference to the debate in the House of Commons in the
month of May prior to the distubances. The subject of discussion was the
King's proclamation (already alluded to), which the Whigs opposed as
tyrannical and unnecessary. After several speakers had delivered their
sentiments, Mr. Courtenay said—"The proclamation was a severe
censure on ministers for not having discharged their duty—in not having
prosecuted the libels, which they said had existence for several months.
He declared his misbelief of the proclamation having been intended for
insidious purposes by one of his Majesty's cabinet ministers, the Home
Secretary (Mr. Dundas), whose good nature and civility had always
induced him to accommodate himself to every minister; which good nature
and civility called to his mind the old man in Edinburgh, who
used to go about with a pail and great-coat, calling out—' Wha wants me
?' The honourable Secretary, upon every change of administration, had
imitated the old man, by calling out—'Wha wants me? ' This readiness to
oblige, therefore, did away with all suspicion of malice."
To this sally of humour, Dundas of course made no
reply. He was impenetrable to all such assaults. It did not fail,
however, to excite the notice of his opponents north of the Tweed; and
we have seen by the "Patent of Knighthood " how the artist improved upon
the suggestion.
Notwithstanding his temporary unpopularity, Sir James
was subsequently at the head of the magistracy in 1794-5, and again in
1798-9. During the latter warlike period his conduct was truly
meritorious. Scottish commerce had suffered considerably from the
attacks of French and Dutch privateers, even on our very coasts, which
had been left in a shamefully unguarded condition. By the
representations of Sir James, and his judicious applications to
Government, proper convoys were obtained for the merchantmen, and due
protection afforded to our bays. He zealously forwarded the plan of
arming the seamen of Leith and the fishermen of Newhaven, by which a
strong body of men were organised in defence of the harbour and
shipping.
So highly were the services of Sir James appreciated,
that at the annual Convention of the Eoyal Burghs of Scotland (of which
he was preses), held at Edinburgh in 1799, the thanks of the Convention
were presented to him in a gold box, "for his constant attention to the
trade of the country, and in testimony of the Convention's sense of his
good services in procuring the appointment of convoys, and in
communicating with the outports on the subject."
Sir James Stirling died on the 17th February, 1805.
In private life, he was very much respected: of mild, gentlemanly
manners, but firm in what lie judged to be right. His habits were
economical, but not parsimonious; and the party entertainments given at
his house were always in a style of magnificence. In person, he was tall
and extremely attenuated. It is related of Sir James, that on being
pointed out to a country woman while walking, attired in his velvet
robes, in a procession, she exclaimed—"Is that the Lord Provost? I
thocht it was the corpse rinnin' awa' wi' the mort-cloth."
At one period Sir James resided in St. Andrew's
Square, the first house north from Piose Street; and, latterly, at the
west end of Queen Street, not far from the Hopetoun Rooms. He acquired
the estate of Larbert, in Stirlingshire, which, with his title of
Baronet, descended to his son, the present Sir Gilbert Stirling, then a
Lieutenant in the Coldstream Guards. He left two daughters, Janet and
Joan, the former of whom was married to Admiral Sir Thomas Livingstone
of Westquarter, near Falkirk. |
|