THE general commission of 1589 was to endure for
the space of three years; but as the commissioners, who had not all
the same interest in the extinction of the Clan Gregor as Glenorchy,
exhibited apparent backwardness in the matter, a particular
commission was granted to Sir Duncan, July, 1591, in which the clan
as a whole are described as rebels, and at the horn for diverse
horrible offences. Fire and sword were denounced against the
harbourers of the clan; power was given to convocate the lieges of
Breadalbane, and the neighbouring districts, to follow up the
pursuit; and the surrounding noblemen and barons were commanded,
under heavy penalties, to aid Sir Duncan. It had been now twice
severely experienced, that the expedient of making them foreswear
and up-give their chief by bonds, completely failed to gain the
fidelity of the M'Gregors, and to make them true vassals of the
Campbells. In this commission, therefore, the system was condemned
by ' the supreme authority. The bonds of maintenance subsisting
between Sir Duncan and the principals of the clan were cancelled,
and all such engagements forbidden for the future. With such ample
powers, Glenorchy was yet far from being master of Clan Alpin's
fate. He, and his truculent cousin, the Laird of Lawers, chased
them, it is true, from Breadalbane, surprised and slew some, and
made others prisoners; but the great body escaped
into districts, where, notwithstanding the royal authority, he did
not care to follow them. The Laird of Glenlyon, moved both by the
claims of recent relationship and hereditary fosterage, openly set
at nought the mandates and defied the vengeance of Glenorchy, nay,
divorced from bed and board the sister of Lawers, his second wife,
because, as formerly mentioned, she madly schemed to betray a
company of M'Gregors for whom her husband had prepared a hospitable
feast. Menzies connived at if he did not aid the flight of the
fugitives to Rannoch. Argyle also, who found the clan very useful in
prosecuting, with safety to himself, bloody feuds against his
enemies, did not wish such hearty success to his kinsmen, Glenorchy,
as to shut up absolutely the passes to the West. Sir Duncan,
therefore, relinquished for a time the scheme of extermination, and,
within a year after his commission was issued, obtained leave from
the king to enter into new bonds of manrent and forgiveness with the
rebels. Failing thus in the bolder course, Sir Duncan, for the first
time, humbled himself to propitiate the M'Gregors, by surrendering a
portion of their escheats. A family of M'Gregors derived from the
house of Roro, known by the-name of M'Quhewin or M'Queens, settled
in Fortingall before 1498. In course of time, they came into
possession of the lands of Duneaves. As already noticed, the
representative of this family—Donald Oig M'Quhewin, associate of the
grandson of Duncan Ladasoch—was beheaded at Kenmore by Colin of
Glenorchy, 1574. His lands fell into the hands of Colin and his
successors by escheat. About 1594, these lands were restored by Sir
Duncan to the nephew of Donald Oig; for, on the 8th August of that
year, we find "Patrik M'Queine, minister of God's word at
Rothesay, ratines all former bonds of manrent granted by Patrik Oig
M'Queine his father, Donald Oig his father's brother, and others
their friends and forebears, to Sir Duncan Campbell of Glenurchay,
knight, and his predecessors, and that because he had sufficient
proof of Sir Duncan's goodwill, especially in giving him possession
of the lands of Easter Tenaif (Duneaves), which he could not enjoy
without the assistance of Sir Duncan; and obliges himself and his
heirs to give to Sir Duncan hosting, hunting, and all other due
service, performed by his predecessors out of the lands of Easter
and Wester Tenaif, Auchattr, and other lands possessed by him; to
give Sir Duncan calp and bairn's part of gear, and not to dispose of
said lands without Sir Duncan's consent, else such deed to be ipso
facto null and void."
Patrik, in the course
of six years, was deprived of the lands thus restored. Sir Duncan,
however, did not find it so cheap or pleasant to keep false
reckoning with the minister of Rothesay, and his brother-complainer,
the Baron of "Curquhyn," as with the more warlike and less astute
principals of the clan. A memoratidum to the following effect
appears in the Black Book:—
"The said Sir Duncan
vves wardit in the Castell of Edinbruch in moneth of Junii, in the
zeir of God 1601, throch the occasioun of cer-tane fals leisand
forged inventis of ane Donald Monteith, alias Barroun Curquhyn, and
ane uther callit Patrik McOuene, ane deboysched and depryved
minister, quhilks fals and forged inventiounis and calum-neis
alledgit, nochwithstanding they wer never qualefeit nor provin, zit
in respect of the pooir and gredie courteouris for the tyme, the
said Sir Duncan was detenit in warde till he payit to the king his
courteouris fourtie thousand markis."
Between 1593 and
1600, several schemes were proposed for training and civilizing
the clan without going to extremity. In 1596, Allaster Roy appeared
before the King and Council at Dunfermline, took the oath of
allegiance to be his Majesty's "house-hald" man, and bound himself
for the good behaviour of his clan. On this, and several other
occasions, the chief exhibited a sincere desire to become a quiet
and obedient subject; but the incessant encroaching by the landlords
of the M'Gregors upon rights which his foolish followers thought no
feudal charters could abrogate, and the lawlessness in which a
century of persecution had hardened them, precipitated him into
courses from which there was no extrication. These measures failing,
Argyle was appointed, with the most ample powers, his Majesty's
Lieutenant and Justice in the whole bounds inhabited by the clan.
The strangest thing in the transaction is, that James bound his
royal hands, by a clause in the commission, promising he would not
hear the suits of, or grant favour or pardon to the M'Gregors or any
one of them, without the concurrence of the Earl. The fount of royal
mercy being thus shut up, the clan fell entirely under the
management of Argyle, who, if he did not persecute them according to
the tenor of his commission, did what was ultimately more fatal—use
them as the tools of revengeful policy, and then betray them. The
Battle of Glenfruin, in 1603, though, as formerly noticed, partly
brought about by an affront offered to the M'Gregors, was in no
slight way fought at the instigation of the King's Lieutenant. In
this conflict fell John Dubh, the brother of the chief.
The undisguised abhorrence of James
VI. to bloodshed and
weapons of war is described by all contemporaries. On more than one
occasion of extreme emergency he did show sparks of hereditary
courage and resolution ; but usually his constitutional timidity
very poorly compensated for the pacific character he affected. After
the conflict of Glenfruin, the enemies of the Clan Gregor skilfully
used the weakness of the monarch to obtain a series of enactments
disgraceful to the statute-book of Scotland. Eleven score widows of
the Colquhouns appeared before James at Stirling, arrayed in
mourning, riding on white palfreys, and each bearing on a spear the
bloody shirt of her husband. An Act of Privy-Council, dated 3rd
April, 1603, proscribes the name of the clan, and denounces death to
any calling himself Gregor or M'Gregor. Another Act of Council,
dated 24th June, 1613, forbids, on pain of death, those formerly
called M'Gregors to assemble together in greater numbers than four.
An Act of Parliament, 1617, chap. 26, continued these laws, and
extended them to the rising generation, because then numbers of the
children of those who had fallen by the persecution were coming of
age, and threatened, if permitted to assume the dreadful patronymic,
to make the clan as formidable as ever.
Argyle, the first to tempt the poor chief to
villainy, was also the first to betray him. By agreement with
Argyle, the Laird of Ardkinglas, on the 2nd October, 1603, having
invited M'Gregor to a banquet in his house, which was built on an
island of Loch Fyne, then and there made him prisoner, and put him
into a boat with five men to guard him, besides the rowers, to be
sent to the Earl. M'Gregor, when half-across, got his hands loosed,
struck the one next to him overboard, leaped after him into the
water, and escaped by swimming. Much to his honour, Allaster of
Glenstrae was more solicitous about the peace and security of his
clan than his personal safety. Knowing well the misrepresentations
by which James had been led to sanction the severe measures against
them, he gave himself up to Argyle upon condition of his allowing
him to pass into England to lay his case before the King, and to
give hostages for the peaceable behaviour of the M'Gregors. No
sooner, however, had he reached Berwick, than he was arrested by the
Earl, brought back to Edinburgh, condemned, and put to death,
together with the hostages, although, as Calder-wood observes,
"reputed honest for their own pairts." The manner in which Argyle
paltered with truth, keeping the word of promise to the ear and
breaking it to the hope, shows that he had everything to fear from
an interview between M'Gregor and the sovereign, and corroborates
the disagreeable truth of the
Laird of Makgregour's Declaration,"
(Producit the time of conviction).
"I Allaster M'Gregour of Glenstrae, confesse
heir, before God, that I have been persuadit, movit, and intysit, as
I am now presentlie accusit and troublit for : olse, gif I had usit
counsall or command of the man that has intysit me, I wad have done
and committit sundrie heich Murthouris mair; ffor trewlie, sen I was
first his Majesteis man, I culd never be at ane eise, by my Lord of
Argyll's falshete and inven-tiones ; for he causit M'Claine and
Clanchamrowne commett herschip and slauchter in my roum of Rennoche,
the quhilk causit my pure men therefter to bege and steill; also
therefter, he moweit my brother and some of my freindis to commit
baith herschip and slauchter upon the Laird of Luss : Alsua, he
persuadit myselfe, with message, to weir aganis the Laird of
Boquhanene, quhilk I did refuise, for the quhilk I was contenowalie
bostit that he sould be my unfreind; and quhen I did refuise his
desire on that point, then he intysit me with uther
messengeris, as be the Laird of M'Knachtane and utheris of my
freindis, to weir and truble the Laird of Luss, quhilk I behuffit to
do for his fals boutgaittis. Then, quhen he saw I was at ane strait,
he cawsit me trow he was my guid friend ; but I did persave he was
slaw therin. Then I made my moyan to pleis his Majestie and Lords of
Counsall, baith of service and obedience, to puneische faultouris
and to saif innosent men; and quhen Argyll was made foresein
thereof, he intysit me to stay and start fra they conditiouns,
causing me to understand that I was dissavit, bot with fair wordis;
to put me in ane snair, that he mychtgett thelandis of Kintyre in
feyell fra his Majestie, begane to put at me and my kin, the quhilk
Argyll inventit maist schamfullie, and persuadit the Laird of
Ardkinlaiss to dissave me, quha was the man I did maist trest into;
but God did relief me in the mean tyme to libertie maist narrowlie.
Nevertheless, Argyll maid the open brutt, that Ardkinlaiss did all
that falsheid by his knowledge, quhilk he did intyse me with oft and
sundrie messages, that he wald mak my peace and saif my lyfe and
landis, only to puneiss certane faultouris of my kin, and my
innosent freindis to renounce thair sir-name, and to leif peaseablie.
Upone the quhilk conditiounis he was sworne be ane ayth to his
freindis, and they sworne to me, and als Ihaifhis warrand and
handwrytt thereupone. The quhilk promeis, gif they be honestlie
keepit, I let God be Judge ! And at oure meeting, in our awin
chalmer, he was sworne to be in witness of his awin friend. Attour,
I confess before God, that he did all his craftie diligence to
intyse me to slay and destroy the Laird of Ardinkaipull, Mackally,
for ony ganes, kyndness, or friendship that mycht he do or gif me ;
the quhilk I did refuis, in respect of my faithfull promeis made to
Mackallay of before. Also, he did all the diligence he culd to move
me to slay the Laird of Ardkinglaiss in lyk manner; but I never
grantit thereto, thro the quhilk he did envy me gretumly. And t now,
seing God and man seis it is greediness of wardlie gier quhilk
causis him to putt at me and my kin, and not the weill of the realme,
nor to pacifie the saymn, nor to his Majestie's honour, bot to putt
down innosent men, to cause pure bairnes and infanttes beg, and pure
wemen to perisch for hunger, quhen they are heriet of their geir,
the quhilk I pray God that thair faultis lycht not upon his Majestie
heirefter, nor upone his successione. Quherfor I wald beseek God
that his Majestie knew the verity, that at this hour I wald be
content to tak banishment, with all my kin that was at the Laird of
Lussis slauchter, and all utheris of thame that ony fault can be
laid to their charge. And his Majestie, of his mercie, to let pure
innosent men and young baiinies pass to libertie, and learn to leif
as innosent men : The quhilk I wald fulfill bot ony kynd of faill,
quhilk wald be mair to the will of God and his Majestie's honour nor
the greidie crewall form that is devysit, only for love of geir,
having nather respect to God nor honesty."
What a fearful echo
of the good old times! The face of affairs had been gradually
changing since the marriage of Malcolm Ceannmore with Margaret of
England. Custom and usage had been displaced by positive laws; the
voice of the monarch and national council rose superior to the
separate and opposing clamours of distinctive straths and glens; and
the Regiam and its cognate regulations at length received the
solidity of things real, and no longer remained what they were
centuries after being ushered into the world, the uncertain
prophecies of things yet to be. Clanship retired from the public
stage, surrendered to antagonistic principles the theoretical
connection between the subject and the king, and limited its
operations to the relation of baron and follower, scorning still to
acknowledge the latter as the vassal of the former. The progressive
change was effected without danger where the ancient families
retained their old possessions, where the chief of the tribe could
still be a chief to those of his surname, and, without a conflict of
hostile elements, be a feudal baron in relation to the monarch and
his laws. The clans who lost their lands were alone those who stuck
to the old traditions, the ancient free institutions of the forest,
with a pertinacity which rendered it necessary for feudalism either
to destroy or be destroyed. An Act of Parliament, passed 1587,
attempted, by stringent regulations, to crush the last efforts of
clanship, by declaring thefts committed by landed men {creachs)
to be treason, and punishable by death ; by ordering the
landlords of persons acknowledging another chief to refuse them all
help, and to remove them from their bounds, or give caution for
them—which they would be unwilling to grant for men obeying the
behests of another; and, moreover, by ordaining that the captains,
chiefs and chieftains of clans, both Border and Highland, be noted
in a roll, and obliged, under pain of fire and sword, to surrender
to the King and Council certain pledges or hostages, liable to
suffer death if redress of injuries were not made by the
persons for whom they lay. A pendant to this Act of some interest,
as showing the weakened state of the clan system in 1587, is, "The
Roll of the Clannes that hes Captaines and Chieftaines, quhom on
they depende, oftimes against the willes of their Landes-Lordes,
alsweill on the Bordoures as Hielandes; and of sum special persons
of Braunches of the saidis Clannes." Seventeen surnames on the
Borders are marked down in the black list, and the following from
the "Hielandes & lies" bear them company—viz., "Buchannanes;
Makfarlanes of the Arroquhair; Mak-knabes; Grahames of Menteith;
Stewarts of Balquhidder; Clanne-Gregore; Clan Lauren; Campbells of
Lochinel; Campbells of Inneran; Clan-dowall of Lome; Stewartes of
Lome or of Appin; Clan-Mackeane Awright; Stewartes of Athoil, and
partes adjacent; Menzies in Athoil and Apnadull; Clane-mak-Thomas in
Glensche; Fergussones; Spaldinges; Makintosches in Athoil;
Clan-Chamron; Clan-Rannald in Loch-Aber; Clan-Rannald of Knoydart,
Moydart, and Glengarry; Clan-Lewid of the Lewis; Clan-Lewid of
Harrichs; Clan-Neill; Clan-Kinnon; Clan-Leane; Clan-Chattane;
Grantes; Frasers; Clan-Keinzie; Clan-Avercis; Munroes; Murrayes in
Sutherland." The list contains nearly the whole purely Celtic clans.
The aim of the Act was not more the putting down of spoliation than
of bringing the whole of Scotland under uniform laws, abolishing the
affinity-tie, and making the territorial arrangement supreme. Ihe
Government was so intent upon not allowing a door of escape from
these stringent enactments, that in the same Parliament (1587) a
supplementary Act was passed, ordering Highlanders and Borderers to
be removed from the "In-land quhair they ar planted, and
presently dwellis or haunts, to the parts quhair they were borne ;
except their Land-lordes, quhair they presently dwell, will become
soverty for them, to make them answerable to the Law as the Lowland
and obedient men, under the pains conteined in the Acts of
Parliament." With most of the tribes above specified, the external
obedience required by the Act was not so difficult to give. As
possessors of land, and bailies on their own property, the chiefs
easily assumed towards the King the feudal relation insisted upon;
while at home, and in presence of their surname, the Celtic customs
remained paramount. The M'Gregors could not give obedience: they had
already been deprived of their land possessions, and they could not
be feudalised without surrendering their clan existence, since
territory, the proper base of the feudal system, remained no longer
with their chief.
The King, working through the organization of
feudalism, was in effect aiming at consolidating the central or
kingly authority into an absolute despotism. But in the meantime a
contrary element, more menacing to the hopes of
autocrats than the affinity-tie of clanship in its most vigorous
days, operated among men. When a child in the cradle, the
Reformation had hailed James with the titles of sovereignty, and
placed a crown upon his baby brow;. and yet in struggling with that
power he spent his whole life in vain. Highland clanship was
proscribed and hunted, and contemporaneously the Lowlands were
leagued into one large clan against the monarch and his policy, by a
principle derived from the deepest springs of human feeling. In the
days of Charles the storm burst; and the maxims of kingcraft, which
James had so strenuously laboured to establish, were contemptuously
tossed to the winds. Is it not strange, that the house of Stuart,
reduced to beggary and want, and their maxims of government become a
political myth, did not find in the circle of the clans so
virulently attacked the most envenomed of their foes, and the
firmest allies of the large rebellious clan of religion? Look at the
preceding list, and compare it with those following Montrose,
Dundee, Mar, and "Bonnie Prince Charlie;" and say, are they not the
same? Clanship was not to be put down by proscription and
persecution; but in the day of trial it freely bled for its
persecutors, and when the star of Stuart finally waned, it
cheerfully surrendered life in their service amidst the horrors of
Culloden! It is a small specimen of that ever-recurring mystery in
the political life of our race—the plans of man crushed by the
long-sweeping operation of providential laws. The panoramic
mutability, and the perpetual culminating and falling of
antagonistic principles, are apt to induce the momentary conviction
that the foundation of private morals alone is immutable, and that
in public affairs expediency, the tame bending to the pressure of
emergencies as they arise, best subserve the good of the creature,
and best harmonize with the laws of the Creator. But it is the
nearness of objects which gives them a perplexing magnitude, and
blinds us to their relative size and position. The farther we go
down the historical gallery, the more do we perceive purpose and
order in the vista of the past, the more are we obliged to admire
the gifts of mercy and beneficence to the whole race, wrung by the
providence of heaven from the efforts of men, though the intentions
of the immediate agents were hopelessly baffled.