DURING the time
Albany remained in France, from 1516 to 1521, Archbishop Beaton was
one of the viceregents of the kingdom, but between two of his
colleagues, the earls of Angus and Arran, there was a continuous
feud, in which the archbishop usually sided with the latter. One of
the contentions between the two earls culminated in the famous
encounter in the streets of Edinburgh, known as "Cleanse the
Causeway," that scuffle being preceded by the dramatic interview
between Bishop Gavin of Dunkeld and Archbishop Beaton, when the
latter's armour-clad conscience "clattered." This was in April,
1520. The duke's resumption of personal government, from November,
1521, till October in the following year, effected a diversion in
factional rivalry. Angus fled to England, and those in this country
who favoured France gained the ascendancy. Harassing incursions into
the Border country were made by the English during Albany's second
absence, which lasted eleven months. Even with the aid of French
auxiliaries, brought with him on his return, the Lord Governor was
not very successful in repelling the enemy, while attempted
negotiations were likewise unsatisfactory. On 20th May, I524, Albany
finally left the country, and for a short time thereafter the charge
of national affairs mainly devolved on Archbishop Beaton.
By this time Beaton
had left Glasgow, and was Archbishop of St. Andrews and chancellor
of the kingdom. Though he had been translated to his new see on loth
October, 1522, the archbishopric of Glasgow remained vacant till 8th
July, 1524, when Gavin Dunbar, son of Sir John Dunbar of Mochrum,
and nephew of Gavin Dunbar, bishop of Aberdeen, was installed by
Pope Clement VII. In the end of the previous year Archbishop Beaton
had been writing to Rome, in evident dread that in the appointment
of the future archbishop the Pope might exempt him from the
primatial and legatine jurisdiction of the see of St. Andrews. His
fears were justified, for on the day of Dunbar's provision to the
archbishopric the Pope granted to him and his suffragans as full an
exemption from the jurisdiction of St. Andrews as had been enjoyed
by his twa predecessors. [Dowden's Bishops, pp. 344-5. It is
believed that, notwithstanding the delay in completing the
appointment, Gavin Dunbar had, through Albany's influence, been
elected archbishop in 1523 (Ibid. p. 344). It appears that after
this the king, through pressure from Beaton, represented to the Pope
that the bull of 8th July, 1524, was to the primate's prejudice and
great loss, and Clement had thereupon ordained that Dunbar's
privileges and exemptions should not extend to the rights of the
archbishop of St. Andrews so far as they arose from his being
primate and legate. But on the Pope, at a later date, being made
better acquainted with the circumstances he, on 21st September,
1531, restored to Dunbar all the immunities enjoyed by his
predecessors Blacader and Beaton (Reg. Episc. No. 499). A few months
before this time (7th February, 1530-1) Henry Wemyss, "bishop of
Candida Casa and of the Chapel Royal of Stirling," offered obedience
and reverence to Archbishop Dunbar as became the duty of a suffragan
to his metropolitan (Ibid. No. 498).] On 27th September, 1524,
Archbishop Dunbar obtained from the King a Precept admitting him to
the temporalities of the see. [Reg. Sec. Sig. i. No. 3298.]
Early in 1525 an
agreement was come to between the Queen and the nobility by which
the government of the country was ,entrusted to a secret council
consisting of the archbishops of St. Andrews and Glasgow, the
Bishops of Aberdeen and Dunblane, and the lords Angus, Arran, Argyle
and Lennox. The Queen was to be perpetual president and to have a
casting vote. The custody of the King was to be given to the peers
in rotation, and at the outset of this arrangement he was to remain
with the archbishop of Glasgow and Angus until November. In 1526 the
King completed his fourteenth year, and parliament passed an
ordinance to the effect that as he was then of major age the royal
prerogative was to be assumed by him and all other authority
formerly derived from him was annulled. This declaration was issued
at a time when the custody of the King had again come into the hands
of Angus; and, at the time when he should have passed it on to other
lords, he was strong enough to refuse and to oppose by a superior
force of arms all attempts to secure the King's release. [Exchequer
Rolls, xv. p. xlvi.] In September, 1526, John, third earl of Lennox,
lost his life in an attempt to rescue his sovereign from the Angus
restraint, and it was not till nearly two years later that James
obtained his freedom, an immediate sequel to which was the wholesale
forfeiture of the Douglases and all their kin.
While the country was
disturbed both by outside aggression and internal dissension, the
merchant class were not remiss in their efforts for the extension of
foreign trade. So far back as the middle of the fourteenth century
Scottish burgesses and merchants had a contract with the burgesses
and merchants of Middleburgh in the Netherlands, where the staple
port for the disposal of merchandise from this country had been
established. [Cony. Rec. i. p. 537.] In the beginning of the
fifteenth century Bruges was the recognised staple of the Scottish
trade in the Netherlands, but in consequence of the marriage of
Mary, daughter of James I., to the lord of Campvere in Zeland, in
1444, the staple was
changed to his state,
where it continued till 1539. [Halyburton's Ledger, pp. liv, lv. In
1539 the staple was removed to Antwerp, and two years later to
Middleburgh, but it soon returned to Campvere, and with short
interruptions it remained at that port till the French Revolution
(Ibid.; Edin. Rec. ii. pp. 97, 105).] But these arrangements do not
seem to have been always continuous. On 27th February, 1519-20, the
Lord Governor represented to the town council and community of the
merchants of Edinburgh that he thought it necessary there should be
a staple in Flanders where the Scots merchants might resort, and he
asked which of the three towns, Campvere, Middleburgh or Bruges,
they preferred as most convenient for the purpose. The choice fell
on Mi ddleburgh. [Edin. Rec. i. p. 195.]
The proceedings just
referred to seem to be those which were adversely discussed in
parliament in 1526, when it was alleged that commissioners had been
appointed by the king, on the advice of the Duke of Albany and lords
of council, with consent of the principal mercantile towns of the
realm viz., Edinburgh, Aberdeen, Stirling, St. Andrews, Perth and
Dundee, to carry through the requisite negotiations. After inquiry,
and on the ground that the "pretendit contract" had been obtained by
"circumvention of our Soverane Lord, and in his les ayge," and that
such was contrary to the commonweal of the realm and detrimental to
the burghs and their merchants, parliament annulled the arrangement
for having the staple and residence of the Scottish merchants at
Middle-burgh and granted full licence and liberty to all merchants
to pass with their ships and goods where they thought most
profitable and where they could be best treated in future. For
obtaining this privilege money had been promised to the King, and
the amount was to be raised by taxation laid on each burgh. [Ancient
Laws, ii. pp. 58-65. Agreements with staple ports thus Ieft
merchants free to choose their own markets, but in the event of the
staple port being preferred merchants had the benefit of whatever
privileges it afforded (Edin. Rec. ii. pp. 106-7).
On account of their
situation the Clyde burghs could not derive much if any benefit from
the staple ports in the Netherlands and they must always have had
freedom to trade elsewhere, ports on the west coast of France being
probably the most favoured. A reference to such trading occurs in a
document dated 18th May,1524, being the record of a conference of
representatives of Dumbarton and Renfrew, held in the parish kirk of
Kilpatrick, under the arrangement between these burghs, in 1424, for
settling any disputes that might arise. [Antea, p. 245.] Renfrew now
complained that Dumbarton had made a bond and federation with
Glasgow, apparently that of 1499, [Antea, p. 246.] without their
leave, and had intromitted with a French ship within the bounds and
freedom of Renfrew; but the discussion did not result in any
definite settlement. [Irving's Dumbartonshire, (1857) pp. 155-7.]
An allusion to one of
the sea dangers of the time is contained in a notary's protocol,
dated 2nd February, 1525-6, where authority is given to a citizen of
Glasgow, and others, to appear before the regent of England and
obtain restoration of gold, silver, hides, woollen cloth and pickled
salmon, which had been captured off the coast of England, by
Englishmen and Spaniards on the ship James of Dumbarton, belonging
to the earl of Arran. [River Clyde, p. 20.]
Between 1494, when
the Lollards of Kyle were brought before James IV. [Antea, pp.
268-70.] till about thirty years later, when the doctrines of Luther
found their way into Scotland, there is little or no notice of the
spread of opinions contrary to the teaching of the church. But, in
1525, to avoid the dangers of "the dampnable opunyeounes of heresy
spred in diverse cuntreis, be the heretik Luthere and his
discipillis," parliament, on 17th July in that year, ordained that
no strangers arriving with their ships, within any port of the
realm, should bring with them any of Luther's books or works, or
rehearse his heresies or opinions, except for refutation, and all
other persons propagating such opinions were to be suitably
punished. [Ancient Laws, ii. p. 58.] But these repressive measures
had the opposite of the desired effect, and according to John Knox
it was the teaching and death of Patrick Hamilton, who had been a
pupil of John Major, while in Glasgow, [Major's History, p. lxxi.]
and who was burnt at St. Andrews, for heresy, in the beginning of
the year 1527-8, that decisively marked the beginning of the
Reformation in Scotland. [Works of John Knox, i, p. 36.]
John Major,
theologian and historian, was principal regent of Glasgow college
during the last four or five years of Beaton's tenure of the
archbishopric. Returning from Paris and coming to Glasgow when about
to enter the fiftieth year of his age, Major had attained a great
reputation as a scholar and teacher and had made considerable
progress with his History of Greater Britain. On his admission to
the university in November, 1518, he was designated a Doctor of
Paris, principal regent of the college and pedagogy of Glasgow,
canon of the Chapel Royal and vicar of Dunlop. Major is referred to
as treasurer of the Chapel Royal in 1520 and also in 1522. On 9th
June of the latter year he removed to St. Andrews. [History of
Chapel Royal (Grampian Club), pp. liv. 97.] While in Glasgow Major
was active in the general business of the university as well as in
teaching, his History was published in 1521, and he could scarcely
have had much time to devote to his treasurership or vicarage, his
chief official connection with which being probably concerned with
the emoluments which seem to have come to him as college endowments.
The name John Knox occurs in a list of students who were
incorporated at Glasgow in 1522, and it has generally been assumed
that the great Reformer was a student at Glasgow. That Knox studied
under Major all ancient accounts agree, but it seems doubtful
whether that was at Glasgow or St. Andrews. [Coutts, p. 45. In his
History Major refers to Glasgow as " the seat of an archbishop, and
of a university, poorly endowed and not rich in scholars. This
notwithstanding, the church possesses prebends many and fat; but in
Scotland such revenues are enjoyed in absentia just as they would be
in praesentia, a custom which I hold to be destitute at once of
justice and common sense.... St. Andrews possesses the first
university; Aberdeen is serviceable to the northern inhabitants, and
Glasgow to those of the west and south." In another passage Major
refers to Glasgow cathedral as " second to no church in Scotland for
its beauty, the multitude of its canons, and the wealth of its
endowments." (Major's History, pp. lxvi-vii, 28, 29, 86.)]
In the first year of
Beaton's archbishopric King James IV. continued to the regents,
students and officers of the university the exemption from taxes and
impositions granted by his predecessors. The letter, under the
king's privy seal, dated at Edinburgh on 7th June, 1509, is general
in its terms and refers to the previous and more specific charters
of exemption for particulars. In Beaton's last year in Glasgow a tax
had been imposed on beneficed persons for the defence of the kingdom
and the members of the university were relieved of payment as
reported to a meeting on 24th May, 1522, at which John Major was
present. Four days before, an ample Letter of Exemption had been
granted by James V., with advice of the Duke of Albany, whereby all
previous exemptions by royalty were specifically confirmed and all
taxations, exactions, and other charges against the rectors, deans
of faculty, procurators, regents, masters and scholars of the
university were discharged. [Glasg. Chart. i. pp. ii. pp. 100, 106 ;
Munimenta, ii. p. 143; Major's History, p. lxvii.]
The few recorded
grants of the canonry of Barlanark came direct from the popes,
though with regard to the lands forming the prebend, King Robert I.
authorised their being held by the canon with special privileges
which were eventually construed as baronial. [Antea, p. 149.] In the
year 1431 there was assigned to Walter Stewart, canon of Glasgow,
bachelor of canon law, the deanery of Moray which Pope Eugenius IV.
authorised him to hold along with "his canonries and prebends of
Barlanark in Glasgow and Balhelvi in Aberdeen," the combined value
of which benefices did not exceed £ioo sterling. [Papal Reg. viii.
p. 411. In 1441, during the reign of James II. his secretary,
William Turnbull, sometime a prebendary and afterwards bishop of
Glasgow, is designated in charters "dominus prebende," i.e. lord or
laird of the prebend, and this is understood as indicating that he
held the prebend of Barlanark. The Latin prebenda is equivalent to
the English Provender, and appears in the Scottish vernacular as
Provand. So far as is known Turnbull did not possess the prebend
during his episcopate. (Keith, p. 251; Reg. Mag. Sig. ii. No. 264-5,
267-8.)] Several benefices held by Robert de Lawedre, canon of
Glasgow, in the year 14.q.7, included the prebend of Cardross and "a
yearly provision for life of £6 sterling, assigned to him by papal
authority on the fruits, etc., of the prebend of Barlanark, in the
church of Glasgow." [Papal Reg. X. p. 310.]
Bishop Blacader
obtained from the Pope authority to annex the prebend of Barlanark
to the bishopric, but by a document dated 19th September, 1487, the
bishop not only promised to preserve the liberties and privileges of
the chapter but he also renounced all claim to the prebend and to
its union and incorporation with the bishopric. [Reg. Episc. No.
450. Connected with his translation from Aberdeen to Glasgow, Bishop
Blacader had incurred heavy debts, and to assist in their
liquidation he, on 31st March, 1487, obtained a papal bull granting
certain subsidies, with the half of the first fruits of all
benefices in his diocese ; (Dow-dens' Bishops, pp. 331-2) and the
annexation of the prebend of Barlanark may at the same time have
been authorised.]
When next traced the
prebend was in the possession of one William Baize (i.e. Balye or
Baillie). On 13th February, 1506-7, King James IV. granted to James
Bailzie of Carfyn, "bruther to Mr. William Bailzie, prebender of
Barlanrik," a respite relating to "his lands and lordship of Provand."
Under this grant James Bailzie, Alexander, his son, and "also Mr.
Williame's servants "were to be free from appearing in justice
courts within the regality of Glasgow for a year. [Reg. Sec. Sig. i.
No. 1429.] About sixteen years later William Bailzie, reserving the
revenues during his own lifetime, resigned the prebend in favour of
Thomas Balze, canon of Glasgow. By a Bull or Letters of Provision
dated 3rd February, 1522-3, in which William Balze is designated "
clerk, lately canon of Glasgow," Pope Adrian VI. ratified this
arrangement and bestowed the prebend on Thomas Balze during his
survivorship of William. [Regality Club, i. p. 74, where a facsimile
and translation of the bull are given; Glasg. Chart. ii. p. 350, No.
755. The Bull was one of the many documents which have been
abstracted from the city's archives since the Inventory of `writs
was compiled in 1696, but fortunately it was deposited in the
Hunterian Museum where it is accessible. In 1549 the prebend was
,conferred on "Mr. William Baillie," presumably a relative of the
first William Glasg. Memorials, p. 210).]
After the secret
council had taken Albany's place in the government of the country,
the comptroller reported to parliament the necessity of economy in
the administration of the King's revenues and the upkeep of his
household ; and, though household accounts are known to have been
kept from 1508. it is probably in consequence of the regulations
adopted in 1525 that we have the extant series beginning at the
latter date. All earlier accounts have disappeared. The books are in
substance journals of the cost of provisioning the royal table, the
expenditure being classified under three heads, pantry, buttery and
kitchen, and interesting particulars regarding the movements of
royalty are chronicled. One of the King's visits to Glasgow was made
on i5th October, 1525, when he and his council, arriving from
Stirling, were entertained by Archbishop Dunbar the whole of that
day and part of the next. After dinner the royal party rode to the
palace of Enchenzean (Inchinnan), the residence of the Earl of
Lennox, where they had supper. The earl entertained the King and his
retinue till after dinner on 17th, when they left for Dumbarton.
Coming from Stirling to Glasgow on 14th December, 1529, the King,
two days thereafter, was at Cumbernauld, perhaps on his way back to
Stirling. On 25th January, 1529-30, the King rode from Stirling to
Glasgow. There the purchases for the royal table were 160 loaves,
30s.; 40 gallons of ale, 53s. 4d.; 3 carcases of beeves, £4 10s.; 4
quarters of a calf, 20s.; 16 sheep, £5 6s. 8d.; 4 ox tongues and 2
lbs. of suet, 3s. The King, on his return from Ayr, was again in
Glasgow on 4th February, when he gave to the Friars 96 loaves and
four gallons of ale. On 11th June, 1533, he passed through Glasgow,
on his way from Stirling, making a pilgrimage to the church of St.
Ninian at Candida Casa. [Excerpta Libris Dornicilii (Bannatyne
Club), 1836, pp. vi, 15, 16, 224. Appx. pp. 5, 27, 28, 42.]
In 1504 a reform in
the administration of justice in the supreme court of the kingdom
had been secured by superseding the itinerary system, under which
courts were held for brief periods in different parts of the
kingdom, by the establishment of a daily council, chosen by the King
and sitting permanently in Edinburgh, or wherever the King should
make his residence. [The evolution of the daily council from its
origin as a committee of parliament is clearly traced in the
Introduction to the recently published Ada Dorinorum Concilii, vol.
ii.] After nearly thirty years' experience of the working of this
judicial body its shortcomings, naturally enough, were revealed and
changes and improvements became desirable, and at a parliament held
in Edinburgh, on 17th May, 1532, the College of Justice was
instituted. Consisting so far of a development of the daily council,
and modelled largely on the Parliament of Paris, but with
modifications suggested by observation of the judicial systems of
other countries, this new court, with its jurisdiction as in the
case of the council limited to civil actions, was to be composed of
fourteen persons, seven lay and seven spiritual, and a president who
should always be a churchman, all named by the crown. But it was
provided that the chancellor of the kingdom might take the place of
president when he pleased and that the king, at his discretion,
might add three or four members to the permanent body. Archbishop
Dunbar was chancellor at this time and in that capacity presided in
the new court when, in presence of the King, it commenced its
sittings on 27th May, 1532. |