|
RAMEZAY, CLAUDE DE,
esquire, lieutenant and captain in the colonial regular troops,
commander of the troops, seigneur, knight of the order of Saint-Louis,
governor of Trois-Rivières and governor of Montreal, acting governor of
New France from 1714 to 1716, builder of the Château de Ramezay, famous
Montreal landmark; b. at La Gesse, in the province of Burgundy, 15 June
1659; d. in Quebec, 31 July 1724.
Ramezay appears to be derived from the
Scottish name Ramsay. The family probably emigrated from Scotland to
France in the late 15th or early 16th century and settled in Burgundy.
There they acquired the fiefs of La Gesse, Montigny, and Boisfleurant
and entered the nobility.
Claude de Ramezay was a son of Timothé de
Ramezay and Catherine Tribouillard, daughter of Hilaire Tribouillard,
intendant in charge of the extensive stables of the Prince de Condé. He
came to Canada in 1685 as a lieutenant in the colonial regular troops
and was promoted to the rank of captain two years later. On 8 Nov. 1690,
in Quebec, he married Marie-Charlotte Denys, a daughter of Pierre Denys
de La Ronde and Catherine Leneuf and thus became linked to one of New
France’s leading families. A few months earlier he had obtained the post
of governor of Trois-Rivières by paying a sum of 3,000 livres to the
destitute widow of the late incumbent, René Gaultier* de Varennes. Only
five years after his arrival in the colony, Ramezay had become a member
of its social and political elite.
With a population of only 358 in 1698,
Trois-Rivières was nothing more than a large village; but being located
halfway between Montreal and Quebec it was a convenient resting place
for persons travelling between the two towns. This placed a heavy burden
on the finances of the local governor, who was expected to entertain the
notables passing through his district. Ramezay, however, was somewhat
vain and like most members of his class regarded money chiefly as a
means of achieving social status. Hosting the colony’s dignitaries and
being referred to as a “real gentleman” by Governor Frontenac [Buade*]
himself must have greatly flattered his ego. Indeed, it may have been to
impress his many guests that he embarked upon an ambitious building
programme. He built a large two-storey house and a number of
outbuildings on land he had purchased on the seigneury of Platon
Sainte-Croix and another still larger house on the other side of town.
In 1699, Bishop Saint-Vallier [La Croix] purchased these properties for
21,000 livres and transferred them to the Ursuline nuns.
Ramezay did some useful work in his official
capacity. Soon after taking office he ordered the town to be fortified
and this was promptly done under the supervision of the engineer,
Dubois* Berthelot de Beaucours. The new governor, however, does not
appear to have been popular with the townspeople. He was brusque and
ill-tempered. Moreover, since neither his salary nor a series of
gratuities ranging in amount from 300 to 2,000 livres sufficed to
maintain his station in Canadian society and to support his large
family, he turned to the fur trade. According to LE Roy de La Potherie,
the governor angered the local merchants by depriving them of high
quality pelts and annoyed the Indians by interfering with their freedom
of trade. La Potherie reports that there was rejoicing in Trois-Rivières
in 1699 when Ramezay left to become commander of the Canadian troops.
Ramezay held this new position for five
years and served satisfactorily. He returned from a voyage to France
with 300 recruits in 1702 and received the cross of Saint-Louis the
following year. In 1704 he succeeded Philippe de Rigaud de Vaudreuil as
governor of Montreal. His reputation as a builder had preceded him to
that city, and predictably enough one of his first concerns was to
provide himself with a residence worthy of his new position. He
purchased a lot on Rue Notre-Dame from his relative, Nicolas
d’Ailleboust de Manthet, and in April 1705 retained the services of the
master mason and architect, Pierre Couturier. The latter undertook to
build a house 66 feet long, three storeys high (including the attic),
and with four chimney-stacks. The walls were to be three and one half
feet thick below ground level and two and one half feet thick above. The
building was completed the following year and the proud owner described
it as “unquestionably the most beautiful in Canada.”
Ramezay’s extravagance coupled with the
losses he suffered in 1704 when the flute Seine was captured by the
English soon landed him in severe financial difficulties. To make ends
meet he harassed the minister with requests for gratuities, tried
without success to sell his house to the crown for 18,000 livres,
borrowed large sums of money from a number of persons, including 3,000
livres from Samuel Vetch, and failed to repay his debts until compelled
to do so by the minister of Marine or the colonial authorities.
Naturally, he also engaged in the fur trade. “The Sieur de Ramezay,”
reads a complaint from Montreal, “is completely involved in trade and .
. . he gives all the members of his numerous family the means of
pursuing it in preference to all other habitants.” His most interesting
initiative, however, was his venture into lumbering. He had a sawmill
operating at Baie Saint-Paul as early as 1702 and he built another in
the Montreal area in 1706. The following year he advised Pontchartrain
that over 20,000 feet of boards and sheathing could be produced in the
district of Montreal every year and he suggested that this wood be used
to launch the shipbuilding industry in Canada.
By 1704 Ramezay had become one of Canada’s
leading personalities but the position he occupied did not fully satisfy
him. He was ambitious, had a factious disposition, and by his marriage
had become enmeshed in the intricate web of New France’s family
rivalries. Soon he was filling his dispatches with virulent attacks
against another Canadianized Frenchman, Philippe de Rigaud de Vaudreuil.
He accused the governor of sending agents into the west to engage in the
fur trade, of being a pawn of the Jesuits, of having failed to adopt
adequate security measures when a New England delegation visited the
colony in 1705, and of having faltered when a riot broke out in Montreal
over the high price of salt. Lamothe Cadillac [Laumet] and Ruette
d’Auteuil joined in this campaign, and for a time they succeeded in
seriously undermining Vaudreuil’s position at Versailles. The governor,
however, counterattacked vigorously. Ramezay, he charged, had formed a
cabal with the other two in order to profit from the Detroit trade; his
violent temper made him unfit to govern. Ramezay heatedly denied these
charges. He had once held a sixth interest in Detroit, he admitted, but
had given it up in order to avoid even the suspicion of placing his
private fortune before the public good. He conceded that he had “a quick
temper” but maintained that he had never mistreated anyone in 15 years,
unlike Vaudreuil who in a moment of anger had been known to slap a man
in the face and kick him in the stomach.
Meantime, as a result of the outbreak of the
War of the Spanish Succession in Europe, a state of war existed between
New France and the English colonies to the south. This exposed Quebec to
naval attack, but Montreal was in a relatively secure position because
of the treaty of 1701 with the Iroquois and the non-belligerent policy
New York was satisfied to follow during the governorship of Lord
Cornbury. But there were other problems to occupy Ramezay’s attention
during the early years of the conflict. Frenchmen were still deserting
the colony for the west in spite of the edict of 1696, and the
contraband trade between Montreal and Albany was reaching frightening
proportions because of the saturated condition of the French market.
Ramezay assured the minister that he was doing his best to check these
practices but he met with no success. Indeed, it is difficult to see
what measures he could have adopted since many of the merchants who were
heavily involved in this trade were also his creditors for large amounts
of money. In 1707, Ramezay did make a valuable suggestion. He urged the
crown to send 40,000 livres of merchandise to Canada annually and to
make it available to the Indians at cheap rates in order to offset the
fall in beaver prices that was driving them to Albany. The French
government, whose resources were entirely committed to the European war,
was unfortunately unable to act on this suggestion and the contraband
trade continued unabated.
In 1709 Ramezay was suddenly called upon to
prove himself as a military leader. In the summer of that year New York
broke the truce with New France and massed militiamen and Indian
auxiliaries, under the command of Francis Nicholson, at the Wood Creek
portage near Albany in preparation for an attack on Montreal. Ramezay,
at the head of an army of 1,500 men, advanced along the Richelieu
against this force. He had been instructed by Vaudreuil to avoid an
engagement and to limit himself to wrecking the boats and canoes and to
dumping the ammunition into the river. Surprise was of the essence for
the success of the operation, but the carelessness of Ramezay’s nephew,
the scatter-brained Pierre-Thomas Tarieu de La Pérade, who had been
placed in charge of a scouting party, betrayed the presence of the
expedition. Shortly after this mishap, Ramezay learned from a prisoner
that the English army at Wood Creek numbered 3,000 men. A council of war
was held to consider the situation, and the infuriated governor decided
that there was nothing to do but retreat.
Fortunately for New France this uninspired
performance had no harmful consequences. New York called off the
expedition against Montreal after learning that the English naval
squadron that was supposed to attack Quebec had been sent to another
destination. However, the episode may have struck yet another blow at
Ramezay’s sinking political fortunes. By 1709, the governor of Montreal
had lost the support of his two old allies, Auteuil and Cadillac. The
former had been recalled as attorney general of the Conseil Supérieur
and the latter was about to be transferred to Louisiana as a result of
Clairambault d’Aigremont’s devastating report. In 1709 also, Madame de
Vaudreuil [Joybert] took up residence at the French court and no doubt
did what she could to discredit her husband’s most outspoken critic. The
blow fell in 1711. In a scathing dispatch, Pontchartrain accused Ramezay
of being the chief fomenter of discord in the colony and warned him that
Louis XIV would already have made some “unpleasant decisions” had not
the minister assured him that the governor of Montreal would mend his
ways in the future. Now that his foe was crushed, Vaudreuil sportingly
extended the olive branch to him. In 1712 Ramezay’s third son,
Charles-Hector, Sieur de La Gesse, was presented to the French court by
Madame de Vaudreuil.
In September 1714 Vaudreuil went to France
on leave of absence and Ramezay served as acting governor until his
return to Canada in the summer of 1716. It was during this period that
the British colonies, capitalizing on the recently concluded treaty of
Utrecht, made their first attempt to infiltrate the Mississippi Valley
and Great Lakes region and to overrun the eastern frontier of New
France. Ramezay had to find ways of containing this expansion, a task
made all the more difficult by a lack of precedents to indicate a
solution and by the return of peace between France and England, which
ruled out a military policy. Ramezay forwarded notes to Robert Hunter,
the governor of New York, asking him to forbid the merchants of his
provinces from sending trading expeditions to the Great Lakes,
traditionally a French region, until the boundary was settled. He also
sought permission from the Indians of the Mississippi to plunder English
supply convoys venturing into the interior. These measures, however,
were, at best, expedients. The security of New France, Ramezay informed
the court, could only be assured by a favourable settlement of the
intercolonial boundary, a question left open by the treaty of Utrecht.
If this were not done he warned, “the English will make greater inroads
into this colony by way of Acadia, Boston, Manhattan, and the Carolinas
in time of peace than when we were at war with them.”
While Ramezay’s analysis of the English
threat was remarkably clear-sighted, his organization of the abortive
campaign of 1715 against the Fox Indians showed once more that he had a
mediocre military mind. Nevertheless, the acting governor cannot be held
responsible for all the mishaps that befell the expedition and disrupted
it before it was even properly underway. Louis de La Porte de Louvigny,
who was supposed to serve as commanding officer, became ill and had to
be replaced by the less qualified Constant LE Marchand de Lignery.
Because of the court’s refusal to finance the campaign, the army had to
be made up entirely of unruly Indians and coureurs de bois. Ramezay,
however, was responsible for the strategy which called for the army to
advance in separate groups and meet at a point near the Fox stronghold.
So complex were these preliminary manoeuvres that they had almost no
chance of success. Fortunately, Ramezay learned from these mistakes. In
1716 Louvigny was sufficiently recovered to lead a second expedition
against the Foxes. This time the strategy was greatly simplified and the
operation was a complete success.
Following Vaudreuil’s return to the colony,
Ramezay went back to being governor of Montreal. The sawmill he had
built several years before now began to yield attractive dividends. In
1719 he was awarded by the French government a contract to supply 2,000
cubic feet of pine sheathing, 8,000 cubic feet of oak sheathing, and
4,000 feet of board annually for six years. This success appears to have
whetted Ramezay’s commercial appetite. In 1723 he asked for fur-trading
rights at the post of Kaministiquia but his request was turned down by
the minister of Marine.
In spite of the success of his lumber
operation and of the praise he won for his conduct of the colony’s
affairs in Vaudreuil’s absence, this final period of Ramezay’s life does
not appear to have been a happy one. Twice in five years tragedy had
struck his family. In 1711 his eldest son, 19-year-old Claude junior, an
ensign in the French navy, lost his life in an attack on Rio de Janeiro.
His second son, Louis, Sieur de Monnoir, was killed by the Cherokees
during the campaign of 1715 against the Fox Indians. It is therefore not
surprising that Ramezay’s character should not have mellowed with the
passage of years. He quarrelled with the Jesuits when he tried to place
a garrison on their mission at Sault-Saint-Louis (Caughnawaga). He
charged the Brothers Hospitallers of Montreal with not doing their duty.
Finally, he clashed once more with Vaudreuil. How the quarrel began is
not clear but it burst into the open in 1723 when the two men publicly
disagreed on a point of Iroquois policy. Angered by the manner in which
Vaudreuil had spoken to him in the presence of a number of people,
Ramezay was soon attacking him in old-time style. A sensational quarrel
between these two leading colonial figures appeared in the making, but
the governor of Montreal died before it could materialize. Vaudreuil
immediately laid past differences aside and spoke warmly of the man who
had been both a colleague and a rival for so many years: “He served . .
. with honour and distinction” he informed the minister, “and . . .
lived very comfortably, having always spent more than his salary, which
is the reason he has left only a very small estate to his widow and
children.” Madame
de Ramezay had indeed been left in a precarious financial condition
which the grant of an annual pension of 1,000 livres did little to
improve. To raise the capital she required she tried without success to
sell her house, which the intendant, Claude-Thomas Dupuy, had evaluated
at 28,245 livres, to the government. With the assistance of a partner,
Clément de Sabrevois* de Bleury, she continued to operate her husband’s
sawmill, but floodings and the wreck of the Chameau, the vessel which
was supposed to carry her lumber to France in 1725, resulted in losses
of 10,000 livres. In spite of these setbacks, the Ramezays did not lose
their interest in the lumber industry. When the mother died in 1742, her
unmarried daughter, Louise*, carried on and expanded the family
business. By the mid 1750s she had several sawmills in operation on the
seigneuries her father had acquired in the Richelieu region, and one
merchant alone owed her 60,000 livres.
Besides Louise, Ramezay was survived by two
sons and at least five daughters. La Gesse, the elder of the sons, died
on 27 Aug. 1725 in the wreck of the Chameau off Île Royale (Cape Breton
Island). The younger, Jean-Baptiste-Nicolas-Roch*, entered the military
and is perhaps best remembered as the man who surrendered Quebec to the
British in September 1759. Of the five daughters, two became nuns and
two others married officers of the colonial regular troops.
Claude de Ramezay did not leave a deep
imprint on the history of New France but his career is nonetheless very
significant. His marriage into a prominent Canadian family, his clashes
with Vaudreuil, the role of grand seigneur, which he played with
considerable success in Trois-Rivières and Montreal, provide valuable
information on how Canadian society was formed at that time, on the
nature of colonial government and politics, and on the mentality and way
of life of a representative member of the Canadian upper class. |
