A foreign war was the cause of the first
battle of Falkirk. The second arose from a civil war, a prominent
feature of which was that many of the friends of order in Scotland were
the insurgents. It was to recover lost rights, not to acquire new, that
this battle was fought.
In 1745, Charles Edward Stuart, elder son
and heir of the Chevalier de St. George, son and heir of James II. and
VII., landed, with seven attendants, from a French ship, in the
Highlands of Scotland. These were the Marquis of Tullibardine, who had
been attainted of high treason in 1716; Sir Thomas Sheridan, who had
been Charles’s preceptor; Sir John MacDonald, an officer in the
Spanish service; Francis Strickland, an English gentleman; Aeneas
MacDonald, banker in Paris, Kinloch Moidart’s brother; Kelly, who had
been a prisoner in the Tower of London; and Buchanan, who had gone to
Rome with a message from Cardinal de Tencin. He was also joined by
several chiefs and their vassals attached to the old rule of hereditary
succession in families and kingdoms. They formed, however, but a small
force, compared with the object they had in view – the
re-establishment, upon the throne of Great Britain, of a family which,
at the death of Queen Anne, had been royal 345 years, in opposition to a
powerful party, by whom the family had been expelled.
Charles was not deterred from advancing,
nor his friends from following. Leaving Perth, he passed through
Glenalmond on the 10th of September, and took this circuitous
route for the purpose of examining his new levies. On the 11th
he arrived at Dunblane, where he lodged with Alexander MacGregor of
Balhaldies, to whom, by Charles’s father, letters patent had been
issued in 1740, creating him "a knight and baronet of the ancient
kingdom of Scotland, to have and to hold to him and to the lawful heirs
male of his body." The room in which the prince held his levees in
Dunblane is still shown to the visitor, and the bed in which he slept is
preserved by the family of Balhaldies. After staying a night here, he
went, with his army, to Doune on the 12th. He crossed the
Forth on the 13th, and slept at Leckie. Next day, he and his
nobles passed by the south of Stirling castle to Bannockburn house, by
invitation of Sir Hugh Paterson, whose mother, Lady Jean Erskine, was
sister of the Earl of Mar, a circumstance which partly accounts for his
attachment to the house of Stuart. On the night of the 15th,
Charles slept in Callendar house, Falkirk, the seat of the Earl of
Kilmarnock; and, on the 16th, left Stirlingshire by
Linlithgow bridge.
After taking Edinburgh, and obtaining a
victory at Preston, penetrating into the heart of England, and
reluctantly retreating, we find him at Glasgow on Christmas, where the
ladies especially, charmed with his princely attire and majestic
bearing, became most loyal. On New-Year’s night, he slept at the
recently forfeited mansion of Kilsyth; and, next day, made Bannockburn
house his head-quarters. His troops were cantoned in the neighbouring
villages. Lord George Murray, with the divisions under his command, in
which were some of the clan regiments, occupied Falkirk. In a day or
two, Stirling was invested; and the magistrates, judging it untenable,
surrendered by capitulation. It was then that the Rev. Ebenezer Erskine,
who had been deponed, eight years before, by the General Assembly,
commanded two companies of the townsmen. Viscount Strathallan and Lord
John Drummond had, meanwhile, joined the prince with the forces they had
levied in the North. Some battering cannon from France, which had
arrived at Montrose, had been sent on to Perth; and were now, with
difficulty, brought across the Forth, partly at the ford of Frew, and
partly at Alloa. On the 10th, the prince broke ground before
the castle, against which he was obliged to carry on a tedious siege.
Lieut.-General Hawley – a rough and
almost brutal man, with a thorough hatred of undisciplined rabbles –
having mustered an army of about 6000 in the vicinity of Edinburgh,
marched to the relief of Stirling castle. Arriving at Falkirk, he
encamped on the north-west, near the bloody field of yore, where Sir
John de Graeme and Sir John Stewart of Bonkill, the friends of Wallace,
had testified their patriotism in the arms of death. He halted there for
a few days, intending, as soon as he had obtained sufficient
intelligence, to attack the foe; of whom, from what he had seen of the
Highlanders at Sheriffmuir, he had formed a very low estimate. Hawley,
who had been appointed commander-in-chief of the Hanoverian army, in
place of Sir John Cope, who was beaten at Prestonpans, had, in fact, a
supreme contempt for the "Highland militia," as he was pleased
to call the young Pretender’s troops; and, for a time, he cavalierly
treated the attitude of the Jacobites.
Charles, on hearing of the approach of
Hawley’s force, resolved to give him battle. Marching on the 17th,
from the rendezvous at Bannockburn, the "Highlanders,"
numbering near 9000, stronger than ever they had been before, were about
crossing the Carron at Dunipace, within three miles of Falkirk, ere they
were perceived. The better to conceal their design, their standard,
distinctly seen from the royalists’ camp, continued flying; and
further to divert the attention of the enemy, a small party appeared on
the opposite side of the river, while the main body was making circuit
to charge on the side least expected. Then, by one of their rapid and
silent movements, concealed from sight by intervening plantations, they
made swiftly for the upland of South Bantaskine. Their presence all the
more strikingly threw the royalists into excited disorder, on account of
Hawley’s absence from the field – dining at Callendar house with the
Countess of Kilmarnock, whose husband had command in the insurgent army,
and who was herself a friend to the cause. Lieut.-Colonel Howard at once
hurried to the general, who, becoming conscious of the emergency, was
seen riding rapidly to his post, his grey hair streaming in the wind.
The troops, notwithstanding his absence, had formed in front of the
camp, on ground now known as Campfield. On his arrival, his first object
was to compete with the enemy for the top of the hill. The dragoons rode
up a narrow lane, still known as Maggie Wood’s Loan. The foot followed
with a similar show of promptitude and pluck; and the artillery,
consisting of ten pieces, came last of all, driven by a few local
carters, who, with their horses, had been hurriedly pressed into King
George’s service. Whether from accident, or design, the cannon stuck
in a swampy spot, at the end of the loan, beyond all power of
extrication; and the drivers then cutting the traces, galloped back to
the town. Both armies were now without artillery, for that of the
insurgents was left at Stirling. The Highlanders, seeing the pedestrian
action of their antagonists, ran to forestall them, displaying speed
rather than arrangement; but seem to have entirely defeated even the
dragoons in the competition. The MacGregors, under Glencairnaig, were
the first on the hill, and took their position accordingly. The
MacDonalds stood next them, as having arrived second. The disposition of
the whole army was thus ruled by the incidents of the race. The
insurgent force drew up in two lines, with a reserve in rear. The
mountaineers occupied the front line, and their less nimble lowland
auxiliaries took the second. Lord George Murray commanded the right,
Lord John Drummond the left. The prince took his station in the rear of
the second line, with the Irish piquets and some horse as a reserve. The
government troops formed in two lines; facing those of the enemy, across
a small ravine; while the convexity of the ground rendered the wings
mutually invisible. The left, consisting of dragoons, and stretching
along more than two-thirds of the enemy’s line, was commanded by
Hawley; the right, of infantry, partly in rear of the cavalry, and
outlining, by two regiments, the left of the enemy, by Major-General
Huske. The reserve, in rear, was composed of the Glasgow militia, Howard’s
regiment, and Argyllshire Highlanders.
At four p.m. (17th January,
1746), the armies stood within 100 yards. What followed was rather a
scuffle than a battle. Hawley ordered his dragoons to advance sword in
hand, and they were met by the Highlanders with their usual irregular
fire. The reception, however, was warm. Several companies after the
first onset, and one volley at the distance of 10 or 12 paces by the
insurgents, at the head of whom Lord George Murray marched with sword
and target, galloped out of sight. The dragoons had got confused; and,
riding along the front of the Highland line, were further assailed with
a deadly fusillade. They had also disordered the infantry next them, and
caused their left flank to be exposed. The Highlanders, taking this
advantage, outflanked them with the broadsword, and forced their flight.
A tempest of wind and rain from the south-west had proved a powerful
auxiliary to the claymore, by disturbing the eye-sight and wetting the
gun-powder of the king’s forces; while the insurgents were not in the
least inconvenienced. The former had been entirely routed, but for the
spirited exertions of two regiments under Brigadier Cholmondely, and of
some scattered battalions rallied by Brigadier Mordaunt. These, firing
briskly, greatly checked their adversaries; who fell back a little, but
still kept their side of the ravine. The pursuit ceased, and the
pursuers made the best of their way back. Many of the second line of the
Highlanders had followed the first line as pursuers; but some of those
who had not, hearing the action renewed in the dusk, and dreading a
defeat, went off westward. Thus had part of either army fled. Not one
regiment of the second line of the insurgents remained in its place; for
the Athole brigade being left almost alone near the right extremity,
joined the MacGregors and the MacDonalds of Keppoch, at the extremity of
the first line. A gap in the center was now traversed by the straggling
parties returned from the chase, unable to find their former comrades,
and armed only with swords. The MacGregors, the MacDonalds of Kippoch,
and the Athole brigade repaired thither under Lord George Murray, and
were joined by Charles and his reserve. The prince encouraged the
stragglers, caused them to snatch up the muskets with which the ground
was thickly strewed; and, ordering them to follow, led to the brow of
the hill. This had the effect of driving back a regiment of dragoons,
who were coming up, and now joined in the general retreat of the king’s
forces. Their cannon, which, before the scuffle, had got mire-stuck,
were taken, together with much ammunition and baggage. Hawley had set
fire to the tents, which may account for short pieces of tent poles,
ironshod at ends, having been got at Grahamston Foundry, during
excavations a few years ago. The wood of one of the relics, which has
suffered less from the teeth of time than the others, measures 15 inches
in length, and the iron into which the wood is inserted is nearly 5
inches long and 1 3/4 inches in diameter, tapering to a point. These
seem to be the remains of tent poles, broken off at the surface of the
ground in the hurried demolition of the camp. Shot balls have also been
found at former times, somewhat further south; likewise a hammer of a
peculiar form, supposed to have been used in wedging up the field
pieces. Hawley’s total loss in killed, wounded, and missing, was 280.
He appears to have got utterly confused by the unexpected reversal of
his too confident hopes; for unpursued, and with a large unbroken rear,
he might have taken up his position at Falkirk. His retreat, moreover,
seems to have been so unexpected, that a part of the Highland army had
dispersed in the notion that they were beaten.
Among the slain were Sir Robert Munro,
Bart. of Foulis, Col. Whitney, and Lieut.-Cols. Powal and Biggar, nine
captains, and three lieutenants. The manner in which Sir Robert Munro
was killed was peculiarly affecting. His regiment, stationed in the
second line, on the left wing, had been greatly disordered, and was
retiring, when he, and a few brother officers, were left behind, exposed
to the enemy. He had, with his half-pike, defended himself against six
assailants, and killed two; but a seventh, coming up, poured a shot into
his body, and brought him down. He was interred in the churchyard of
Falkirk, by the brave MacDonalds, who, of the hostile party, could not
but honour so noble a man. His relations erected a handsome monument
over his grave. On the side facing the north, there are such emblems
carved as muskets, cannon, flags, drums, &c. On the south, are the
family arms, with the strange motto, "Dread God." On the west,
there is a Latin inscription, of which the following English translation
is given on the side facing the east: - "Here lies interred the
body of Sir Robert Munro of Foulis, Knt. And Bar., Colonel of a Regiment
of Foot. The life he had spent in the Parliament and camp with honour,
he lost in the cause of Liberty and Religion, near Falkirk, on the 17th
of January, 1746, aged 62 years. As long as history narrates the battle
of Fontenoy, his courage and conduct on that day, in the command of the
Highland Regiment, will be remembered. Sincere and active in the service
of his friends – humane and forgiving to his enemies – generous and
benevolent to all, his death was universally regretted, even by those
who slew him.
"With Sir Robert Munro was killed
his brother, Doctor Duncan Munro, of Obsdale, aged 59, who, unarmed,
would not forsake his wounded brother."
About four yards to the south-east of
Monro’s tomb, there is a flat-stone with the following inscription: -
"In memory of William Edmonstoune, of Cambuswallace,
Captain-lieutenant in the XXVII. Regiment of Foot, who, bravely fighting
in defence of the King, and of the liberties, sacred and civil, of his
country, fell in battle, near Falkirk, on XVII. day of January, 1746,
aged 32 years."
At the close of the engagement, a large
trench was dug, into which not only the dead but the dying were
unceremoniously consigned. One of others – a poor native of Skye –
was relentlessly dragged to the edge of the pit. He earnestly entreated
his burialists to spare him to his friends. "Jist gang in wi’
quiet," was the cool reply, "for ta prince may be angry."
During the short stay of the Highlanders
in Falkirk, they treated the inhabitants with unusual lenity, on account
of their connection with the Earl of Kilmarnock, and the readiness they
displayed in serving the cause of the prince. But this general
forbearance was not without exceptions. A small party, on the day after
the battle, laid violent hands on a flaming Jacobite, named David Watt,
then the principal innkeeper in the town, brought him out to the street
in front of his own door, and, setting him down squat upon the causeway,
deliberately eased his feet of a pair of new shoes with silver buckles.
He pled his Jacobitism to save them; but the ragged rascals, accustomed
perhaps to such excuses, disregarded the declaration, ironically
observing, "Sae muckle ta better. She’ll no grumble to change a
progue for ta prince’s guid." It is said that David’s Jacobite
principles were a good deal shaken by this unhappy incident. On the farm
of Stoneyrigg, too, the hungry heroes entered the "biggin,"
and demanded a substantial meal. The gudewife, at the time, was occupied
with the cradle; but in illustration, as it were, of the maxim that no
man can afford to be shy if needful, one of the starting loons
generously offered to rock the child while the feast was being prepared,
requesting Mrs. Stark, incidentally, to "heeshtie wi’ a pickle
preed and cheese, until the petter meat was ready." But the kitchen
regalement, which followed the lunch, did not by any means satisfy the
grasping greed of that lawless lot. The stable came to be inspected
eventually; and here, amongst other stock, was a fine grey mare with
which they marched off to Stirling. The laird, feeling that his
uninvited guests were making rather free with his property, at once
hoisted the white flag to the house-top; but the winter afternoon being
far spent, the distress signal was not seen. Leaving the steading, in a
direct line with Stirling, a marsh was encountered at the outset; but
through this the Highlanders boldy travelled, the mare, however, at one
part, sinking almost breast-deep into the swamp. Still they were not to
be outdone. Placing themselves "shouther tae shouther," some
at the head and others at the tail, they speedily had the animal
extricated, when Mr. Stark, seeing this performance, expressed his
astonishment at their success; but the reply was as usual, curt and
cutting, "Did she no ken that hersels can dae what nae ither men
can dae?" In the hope, however, of wiling his favourite animal out
of the clutches of the Highlanders, the laird took staff in hand, and
kept close on their track to head-quarters. There he had an audience of
the prince, to whom he related the circumstances of his errand. Charles
at once asked a sight of the mare, and then coolly replied, "Well,
gudeman, you might be proud that you had such an animal so fit for the
prince’s service."
Charles, with his men, remained the night
after the battle of Falkirk. His army lost four captains, four
subalterns, with forty men killed, and eighty wounded. In the evening,
he was conducted by torchlight to a lodging which had been provided for
him in the house of a Mrs. Graham, the widow of a physician, a Jacobite,
and a woman of superior intelligence and manners. This house, which
stands opposite the steeple, was then the best in town; but, according
to the fashion of the times, the best room, and that in which Charles
was obliged to dine and hold his court, contained a bed concealed within
folding doors.
Next day, the prince returned
triumphantly to Bannockburn. Lord George Murray, and the Highlanders,
remained; while the Duke of Perth, with the Lowlanders, Lord John
Drummond’s regiment, and the Irish piquets, returned to Stirling, and
resumed the siege of the castle. Most of the prisoners taken by them
were sent from Stirling to Doune. Home, the renowned author of
"Douglas," was of the number; but, after six days, he escaped,
with some others, by a rope, made of blankets, and fastened to the
battlement of the west side of the edifice, with which there was a
passage from their lodgings to the top of the keep, through the queen’s
room, along the top of the battlement, and around the open court on the
south side.
Hawley, though not formally condemned,
was disgraced and unpopular. He had, on his return to Edinburgh, ordered
several officers and soldiers to be tried for bad behavior in the late
battle; and two or three privates were condemned to be shot, and more
than one officer cashiered. On the news of the affair at Falkirk, the
government committed the suppression of the insurrection to the supreme
management of William Augustus Duke of Cumberland, a prince of the
blood; and who, although only in the twenty-sixth year, was no common
man. This youth, however, belonged to an age when high command was, in a
great measure, a royal science, which men of inferior rank had scanty
opportunities of studying. He was a great favourite with the army; and
it was hoped that his appearance in Scotland would tend to keep alive,
and increase, an interest in the existing dynasty. He came to Holyrood
house on the 30th of January; and entered Stirlingshire, by
Linlithgow bridge, on the 1st of February. His army, on
marching out of Linlithgow, had heard two very loud sounds, resembling
explosions, in the direction, and seemingly at the distance, of
Stirling. It was the blowing up of the powder-magazines which the
insurgents had formed. To the concussion occasioned by one of them, in
St. Ninian’s church, three or four of the soldiers, and ten of the
natives, had fallen victims. Charles’s army, spiking their heavy
cannon, raised the siege of Stirling castle, and evacuated the vicinity.
As an arch of Stirling bridge had been broken down by the governor,
Blackney, in December, to prevent Charles’s northern levies from
crossing, and was further secured by troops, and the cannon of the
castle; the retiring army, as formerly, when advancing, took the ford of
Frew. General Mordaunt took possession of Stirling; and, next day, the
Duke of Cumberland, entering it, ordered the bridge to be repaired. On
the 4th of February, he marched, with his army, on his way to
the north.
And what more of Charles? Enough for him
is known by the disastrous and fatal issues of Culloden. Latterly titled
Count Albany, he had married a continental lady. In 1761, we find him
again in Britain, but for the last time, when he visited the Tower of
London, and most parts of the city. Having gratified his curiosity, and
affection for his friends there, he returned quietly to the continent.
Eventually, he fell a prey to chagrin, both in his public and domestic
capacity. His disappointments had, as is alleged, driven him to the too
free use of the bottle, and the remedy, aggravating the disease, had
brought on such ebullitions of passion, as caused unhappiness in his
countess, and, at length, a formal separation.
Last of all, the words: - On the 31st
of January, 1788, at Rome, died Prince Charles Edward Lewis Philip
Cassimir Mary-Silvester Stuart, aged sixty-seven years.
David Hume, the historian, in a letter to
Sir John Pringle, of 10th February, 1773, attempted to cast a
cloud over the splendour of the prince’s character, by saying that
Lord Mareschall had a bad opinion of him, and that he himself was
confirmed in that nobleman’s impression by a conversation with the
celebrated Helvetius. The controversy, apart from the subject, derives
interest from the personages engaged. "That gentleman," said
Mr. Hume, "told me that he had no acquaintance with the Pretender,
but some time after the prince was chased out of France, ‘a letter,’
said he, ‘was brought me from him, in which he told me, that the
necessity of his affairs obliged him to be at Paris, and, as he knew me
by character to be a man of the greatest probity and honour in France,
he would trust himself to me if I would conceal and protect him. I own,’
added Helvetius to me, ‘although I knew the danger to be greater of
harbouring him at Paris than at London, and although I thought the
family of Hanover not only the lawful sovereigns of England, but the
only lawful sovereigns of Europe, as having the full and free consent of
the people, yet was I such a dupe to his flattery, that I invited him to
my house, concealed him there near two years, met with his partisans
upon Pon Neuf, and found at last that I had incurred all this danger and
trouble for – the most unworthy of all mortals; in so much, that I
have been assured when he went down to Nantz, to embark in his
expedition to Scotland, he took fright, and refused to go on board, and
his attendants, thinking the matter gone too far, and that they would be
affronted by his cowardice, carried him in the night-time into the ship
- pies et mains lies.’ I asked him if he meant literally. ‘Yes,’
said he, ‘literally. They tied and carried him by main force.’ What
think you now," says Mr. Hume to Sir John Pringle, "of this
hero and conqueror? Such an unaccountable mixture of temerity and
timidity in the same character is not a little singular." As this
historian generally favours the House of Stuart, he must be regarded as
communicating, upon so grave a subject, even in a familiar epistle, the
genuine impressions of his mind; and, in relation to Mr. Hume’s
metaphysics, it may be said, that this mixture of skepticism and
credulity in the same person is not a little unaccountable. The prince’s
alleged cowardice (which alone Helvetius brings in proof of his general
unworthiness, and which, indeed, especially in a prince and soldier,
affords a presumption of depravity in other respects) is rendered highly
improbable by his general conduct. Soon after the publication of Mr.
Hume’s letter, the following strictures, under the fictitious name of
"Acasto," came out in a London newspaper. The account given by
this writer, anonymous though he be, is more likely than that of
Helvetius. "The publishing of Mr. Hume’s letter," says
Acasto, "at this time is considered an indecent attempt not only to
disturb the ashes of the dead, but to throw dust in the eyes of the
living, already too much blinded. That the prince was under some
obligations to Helvetius is admitted. When under his roof, he happened
to receive a remittance, which his sordid landlord no sooner saw, than
he made a dead set at the whole of it, stating the great and eminent
services he had rendered for him. The prince, however, pocketing the
money, retired to his chamber, but not without overhearing some indecent
expressions muttered as he went out, touching meanness, dishonesty,
ingratitude, and so forth. In the morning, notwithstanding what had
occurred the previous night, the prince gave this son of avidity one
hundred louisd’ors, observing that it was almost unnecessary to tell
him, that money had been so long a stranger to his purse, that himself
and the major part of this suite, were in want of many necessaries, so
that he could not without the greatest difficulty spare him any more
then; but should his affairs take a favourable turn, all his friends
might rely upon their being generously remunerated for their kindness to
him. This was the real cause of his host’s animosity. As to the prince’s
tardiness in embarking, it has no plausibility in it, unless the
following circumstance could furnish some cynic with the materials of
fabrication. When about to go on board the ship that wafted him to
Scotland, he was unexpectedly presented by a private hand with one
thousand guineas. This event caused a delay of about twenty minutes,
after the signal gun had been fired. It was requisite that the receiver
of so handsome a present should show some marks of civility to the
giver, not to mention the time necessary to get at the strong box, and
lodge the money."
John Home, in 1802, the date of his
History of the Rebellion in 1745, says of Charles, when entering
Holyrood house, that, in the opinion of some, he looked more like a
gentleman and man of fashion than a hero or conqueror.
"Hence," says he, "they formed their conclusions that the
enterprise was above the pitch of his mind, and that his heart was not
great enough for the sphere in which he moved." Some might thus
judge from conceived appearances. Others, however, judged differently;
and such as judged favourably formed the truest estimate. Witness the
interview with Charles, Boisdale, and Kinloch Moidart’s brother; and
Charles’s landing on the mainland of Scotland with only eight men on
whose services he could depend. An affecting scene almost instantly
follows with Lochiel. As there was not the least prospect of success,
Lochiel advised his royal highness to return to France, and to reserve
himself and his faithful friends for a more favourable opportunity.
Charles refused to follow his advice, affirming, amongst other things,
that he only wished the Highlanders to begin the war. Lochiel still
resisted, entreating Charles to be more temperate, and consent to remain
concealed where he was, till he and his other friends should meet, and
concert what was best to be done. Charles, whose mind was wound up to
the utmost pitch of impatience, paid no regard to this proposal, but
answered that he was determined to put all to the hazard. "In a few
days," said he, "with the few men I have, I will erect the
royal standard, and proclaim to the people of Britain, that Charles
Stuart is come over to claim the crown of his ancestors, to win it, or
to perish in the attempt. Lochiel, who, my father has often told me, was
our warmest friend, may stay at home, and learn from the newspapers the
fate of his prince." "No," said Lochiel, "I’ll
share the fate of my prince, and so shall every man over whom nature and
fortune has given me power."
Before the battle of Preston, Charles
declared that he would lead on the Highlanders himself, and charge at
their head. The chiefs exclaimed they were ruined and undone; for, if
any accident befel him, a defeat or victory was the same to them; and
that, if he persisted in his resolution, they would go home, and make
the best terms they could for themselves. This remonstrance had the
desired effect, and Charles did not persist.
The different accounts of the retreat
from Derby agree in this – that Charles was extremely averse, and so
much offended that he behaved for some time as if he no longer thought
himself commander of the army. In the march forward he had always been
the first up in the morning, had the men in motion before the break of
day, and usually marched on foot with them. It was different in the
retreat; he made them wait for him.
Need we anticipate those proofs of
heroism which occur in the subsequent part of Charles’s history, when
his patience and fortitude were so severely tried? It may, perhaps, be
said that he had committed himself, and acted from necessity; but had
not originally evinced a vigorous mind. That Charles, however, had shown
his contempt of danger at an early stage, and before "his courage
was screwed to the sticking point," appears from a letter of the
Duke of Berwick to His Grace of Fitz-James, when he was only in his
fifteenth year. "Greta, 7th August, 1734. N.S. The siege
of Greta is now over, blessed be God, and, though a very short one, I
suffered more while it lasted than in any siege I have been hitherto
present at. You may easily imagine the uneasiness I talk of is my
anxiety and concern for the person of Charles Prince of Wales. The king,
his father, had sent him hither, under my care, to witness the siege,
and laid his commands on me, not only to direct him, but even to show
him everything meriting his attention. And I must confess that he made
me pass some as uneasy moments as ever I met with from the crossest
accidents of my past life. Just on his arrival, I conducted him to the
trenches, where he showed not the least surprise at the enemy’s fire,
even when the balls were hissing about his ears. I was relieved the
following day from the trenches; and, as the house I lodged in was very
much exposed, the enemy discharged at once five pieces of cannon against
it, which made me move my quarters. The prince, arriving a moment after,
would at any rate go into the house, though I did all I could to
dissuade him from it, by representing the danger he was exposing himself
to. Yet he stayed in it a considerable time with an undisturbed
countenance, though the walls had been pierced through with the cannon
shot. The prince’s manner and conversation are really bewitching. . .
. .The King of Naples is much taken with his polite behaviour, and there
is not the least necessity of suggesting to him what is proper for him
either to say or do." |