V, Page 116. Supposed Ferocity of the Highlanders
A Highlander would fight to the last drop of his blood
at the command of his Chief; and if he thought his own honour, or that of
his district or clan, insulted, he was equally ready to call for redress,
and to seek revenge : yet, with this disposition, and though generally
armed, few lives were lost, except in general engagements and skirmishes.
This is particularly to be remarked in their personal encounters, duels,
and trials of swordmanship.
[A relation of mine, the late Mr Stewart of Bohallie,
exhibited an instance of this. He was one of the gentlemen soldiers in the
Black Watch, (but left them before the march to England), and one of the
best swordsmen of his time. Latterly he was of a mild disposition, but in
his youth he had been hot and impetuous ; and as in those days the country
was full of young men equally ready to take lire, persons of this
description had ample opportunity of proving the temper of their swords,
and their dexterity in the use of them. Bohallie often spoke of many
contests and trials of skill, but they always avoided, he said, coming to
extremities, and were in general satisfied when blood was drawn, and "I
had the good fortune never to kill my man." His swords and targets gave
evidence of the service they had seen. On one occasion he was passing from
Breadalbane to Lochlomond through Glenfalloch, in company with James
Macgregor, one of Rob Hoy's sons. As they came to a certain spot,
Macgregor said, "It was here I tried the mettle of one of your kinsmen."
Some miles farther on, he continued, "Here I made another of your blood
feel the superiority of my sword; and here," said he, when in sight of
Benlomond, in the country of the Macgregors, "I made a third of your royal
clan yield to clan Gregor." My old friend's blood was set in motion by the
first remark; the second, as he said, made it boil; however, he restrained
himself till the third, when he exclaimed, "You have said and done enough;
now stand, defend yourself, and see if the fourth defeat of a Stewart will
give victory to a Gregarach." As they were both good swordsmen, it was
some time before Macgregor received a cut in the sword arm, when, dropping
his target, he gave up the contest.]
The stories detailed of private assassinations,
murders, and conflagration, deserve no credit, as is well known to every
man of intelligence in the country, at least when reported to have
occurred within the last century and a half. In earlier times, there were
murders in the Highlands, as there were in the streets of Edinburgh in
mid-day, but much of these may be attributed to the weakness of the laws,
and a high spirited turbulence. The character of the Highlanders will be
better understood by their actions, than by collecting anecdotes two and
three hundred years old, and giving them as specimens of what was supposed
to have occurred within the fifty years preceding the Rebellion of 1745.
In this Rebellion did they display any blood-thirsty atrocity? It were as
just to take the character of the people of Scotland from the period and
scenes described by Pitscottie in the extract I have quoted, as thus to
collect all the revolting anecdotes and repetitions of centuries, and give
them as specimens of the Highland character in the days of Rob Roy
Macgregor. Even in the seventeenth century, when turbulence was at its
height, less atrocity was shown by the Highlanders, than has been
exhibited by enlightened nations of modern times, when living at free
quarters in an enemy's country. Spain, Portugal, Germany, Russia, Italy,
and Egypt, have ample reason to remember the murders, conflagrations and
spoliation of the armies of France. The following statement shows the
manner in which the Highlanders comported themselves, when ordered from
their mountains, for the special purpose of keeping down the Republican
spirit in the south-west of Scotland, and of living at free quarters on
the Covenanters, and others inimical to the measures of Government. This
was in 1678, when the "Highland Host," (as they were called,) of 8000 men,
were ordered south, to "eat up" the Covenanters. In what manner they
obeyed these instructions we learn from an eye-witness, whose account is
preserved in Wodrow's MS. in the Advocates' Library. This writer, who
evinces no friendship for this " Heathen and Unholy Host," describes their
parties sent out for provisions, and the sufferings of the inhabitants,
who were beaten and driven out of their houses if they refused to give
what they demanded. After a detail of outrages, which indeed were to be
expected, as it was for this very purpose that they were sent on the duty,
he concludes, in a manner hardly to be expected, and certainly very
different from the accounts we read of the proceedings of the modern
Vandals when overrunning the Continent, and who, if they had forced their
way into this country, and had, like the Highlanders, been ordered to live
at free quarters, "to eat up," harass, and keep down the people, would not
perhaps have left the country with such a report of their proceedings as
the following. "Yet I hear not," says the writer in Wodrow's MS., "of any
having been killed, though many were hurt; but I would not have you
think that all the Highlanders behave after the same manner," (going about
in parties to collect provisions and plunder.) " No, there is a difference
both among the men and leaders. The Marquis of Atholl's men are generally
commended, both as the best appointed and the best behaved. Neither do I
hear of any hurt done by the Earl of Moray's men, but all of them take
free quarters, and at their own discretion." Living in this manner, and
sent for such a special purpose, none were killed even by the most
turbulent. That numbers were hurt in defending their property was to be
expected, and it is matter of surprise, that, in such circumstances, lives
were not lost.