T, Page 110. Second-sight
There are many traits of the character, manners, and
dispositions of the people, which I have not noticed. The most remarkable
of these is that imaginary talent of seeing into futurity, commonly called
the "Second Sight." The subject has been frequently discussed ; and I
shall, therefore, say little of these ideal flights of a warm and vivid
imagination. But however ridiculous the belief of the second sight may now
appear, it certainly had no small influence on the manners and actions of
the people. The predictions of the seers impressed their minds with awe,
and as they were generally such as brought to the remembrance death, a
future state, retributive justice, the reward of honourable and virtuous
conduct, and the punishment of the wicked, they certainly controlled the
passions, and, as I have often had occasion to observe, supplied the
defect of those laws which now extend to the most distant recesses of the
mountains.
The impressions of a warm imagination appear so like
realities, and their confirmation is so readily found in subsequent
events, that we can scarcely wonder if popular superstitions have long
maintained their ground, even against the advances of reason and science.
Allowing the possibility of coming events being shadowed forth by
supernatural agency to some favoured seers, the question naturally occurs,
Why should those revelations be confined to the Highlanders of Scotland?
Yet it must be owned, that the coincidences between events and their
foreboding have, in many instances, been so curious and remarkable, that
credulous minds may be excused for yielding to the impression of their
prophetic character. It may not be improper to produce an instance or two
for the amusement of the reader.
Late in an autumnal evening in the year 1773, the son
of a neighbouring gentleman came to my father's house. He and my mother
were from home, but several friends were in the house. The young gentleman
spoke little, and seemed absorbed in deep thought. Soon after he arrived
he inquired for a boy of the family, then about three years of age. When
shown into the nursery, the nurse was trying on a pair of new shoes, and
complaining that they did not fit. "They will fit him before he will have
occasion for them," said the young gentleman. This called forth the
chidings of the nurse for predicting evil to the child, who was stout and
healthy. When he returned to the party he had left in the sitting-room,
who had heard his observations on the shoes, they cautioned him to take
care that the nurse did not derange his new talent of the second sight,
with some ironical congratulations on his pretended acquirement. This
brought on an explanation, when he told them, that, as he approached the
end of a wooden bridge thrown across a stream at a short distance from the
house, be was astonished to see a crowd of people passing the bridge.
Coming nearer, he observed a person carrying a small coffin, followed by
about twenty gentlemen, all of his acquaintance his own father and mine
being of the number, with a concourse of the country people. He did not
attempt to join, but saw them turn off to the right in the direction of
the church-yard, which they entered. He then proceeded on his intended
visit, much impressed from what he had seen with a feeling of awe, and
believing it to have been a representation of the death and funeral of a
child of the family. In this apprehension he was the more confirmed, as he
knew jny father was at Blair Athole, and that he had left his own father
at home an hour before. The whole received perfect confirmation in his
mind by the sudden death of the boy the following night, and the
consequent funeral, which was exactly similar to that before represented
to his imagination.
This gentleman was not a professed seer ; this was his
first and his last vision ; and, as he told me, it was sufficient. No
reasoning or argument could convince him that the appearance was an
illusion. Now when a man of education and of general knowledge of the
world, as this gentleman was, became so bewildered in his imaginations,
and that even so late as the year 1773, it cannot be matter of surprise
that the poetical enthusiasm of the Highlanders, in their days of chivalry
and romance, should have predisposed them to credit wonders which so
deeply interested them.
The other instance occurred in the year 1775, when a
tenant of the late Lord Breadalbane called upon him, bitterly lamenting
the loss of his son, who, he said, had been killed in battle on a day he
mentioned. His Lordship told him that was impossible, as no accounts had
been received of any battle, or even of hostilities having commenced. But
the man would not be comforted, saying, that he saw his son lying dead,
and many officers and soldiers also dead, around him. Lord Breadalbane,
perceiving that the poor man would not be consoled, left him ; but when
the account of the battle of Bunker's Hill arrived some weeks afterwards,
he learnt, with no small surprise, that the young man had been killed at
the time and in the manner described by his father.