MELVILLE, ANDREW, one of the
most illustrious of the Scottish reformers, whose name stands next to that
of Knox in the history of the Reformation, and is second to none in the
erudition of the time, was born on the 1st of August, 1545, at
Baldovy or Baldowy, an estate on the banks of the South Esk, near Montrose,
of which his father was proprietor. The form in which the family name was
generally known at that time in Scotland and in foreign countries, was
Melvyne or Melvin. Throughout the interesting correspondence, written in
Latin, between the subject of this memoir and his amiable and accomplished
nephew, whose life is recorded in the next article, the name is uniformly
written Melvinus. In Fifeshire, at the present day, the name is commonly
pronounced Melvin, and at an earlier period it was frequently both
pronounced and written Melin, Mellin, and Melling. The Melvilles of Baldowy
were a family of some note in the middle of the sixteenth century, and near
cadets of Melville of Raith, who was considered to be the chief of an
influential name in the county of Fife. Melville or Dysart, however, was
acknowledged by Andrew Melville to have been the chief of the Baldowy branch
of the family. Andrew was the youngest of nine sons, and had the misfortune
to lose his father, who fell in the battle of Pinkie, while he was yet only
two years of age. The death of his mother, also, soon afterwards took place,
and he was thus left an orphan. The loss of his parents, however, was in a
great measure compensated by the kindness and tenderness of his eldest
brother and the wife of that individual, both of whom watched over his
infant years with the most anxious affection and assiduity. The long-tried
and unwearied kindness of the latter, in particular, made a strong
impression upon Melville, which lasted during the whole of his life.
His brother, perceiving his
early propensity to learning, resolved to encourage it, and with this view
gave him the best education which the country afforded. He was besides of a
weakly habit of body, a consideration which had its weight in determining
the line of life he should pursue. Young Melville was accordingly put to the
grammar-school of Montrose, where he acquired the elements of the Latin
language, and, among other accomplishments, a knowledge of Greek, which was
then a rare study in Scotland. When removed, in his fourteenth year, to the
university of St Andrews, he surprised his teachers by his knowledge of
Greek, with which they were wholly unacquainted. He was indebted for this
fortunate peculiarity in his education to a Frenchman of the name of
Marsilliers, who had been established as a teacher of Greek in the school of
Montrose, by John Erskine of Dun.
The great progress which
young Melville had made in learning, excited the astonishment and attracted
the attention of the various teachers in the university; particularly Mr
John Douglas, the rector, who, on one occasion having taken the young and
weakly boy between his knees, was so delighted with his replies, when
questioned on the subject of his studies, that he exclaimed, "My silly
fatherless and motherless boy, it’s ill to witt (to guess) what God may make
of thee yet."
The reputation which Melville
acquired soon after entering the college, increased with his stay there; and
he left it, on finishing the usual course of study, with the character of
being "the best philosopher, poet, and Grecian, of any young master in the
land." Having acquired all the learning which his native country afforded,
he resolved to proceed to the continent to complete his education; and,
accordingly, with the consent of his brothers, set out for France in the
autumn of 1564, being still only in the nineteenth year of his age. At the
university of Paris, whither he repaired, he acquired a similar reputation
for general talent, and particularly for his knowledge of Greek, with that
which he had secured at St Andrews. Here he remained for two years, when he
removed to Poictiers. On his arrival at the latter place, such was the
celebrity already attached to his name, he was made regent in the college of
St Marceon, although yet only twenty-one years of age. From Poictiers, he
went some time afterwards to Geneva, where he was presented with the
humanity chair in the academy, which happened fortunately to be then vacant.
In 1574, he returned to his native country, after an absence altogether of
ten years. On his arrival at Edinburgh, he was invited by the regent Morton
to enter his family as a domestic instructor, with a promise of advancement
when opportunity should offer. This invitation he declined, alleging that he
preferred an academical life, and that the object of his highest ambition
was to obtain an appointment in one of the universities. He now retired to
Baldovy, where he spent the following three months, enjoying the society of
his elder brother, and amusing himself by superintending the studies of his
nephew, James Melville.
At the end of this period, he
was appointed principal of the college of Glasgow by the General Assembly,
and immediately proceeded thither to assume the duties of his office. Here
the learning and talents of Melville were eminently serviceable, not only to
the university over which he presided, but to the whole kingdom. He
introduced improvements in teaching and in discipline, which at once
procured a high degree of popularity to the college, and greatly promoted
the cause of general education throughout Scotland. Melville possessed a
considerable share of that intrepidity for which his great predecessor,
Knox, was so remarkable. At an interview, on one occasion, with the regent
Morton, who was highly displeased with some proceedings of the General
Assembly, of which Melville was a member, the former, irritated by what he
conceived to be obstinacy in the latter, exclaimed, "There will never be
quietness in this country, till half-a-dozen of you be hanged or
banished."—"Hark, sir," said Melville, "threaten your courtiers after that
manner. It is the same to me, whether I rot in the air or in the ground. The
earth is the Lord’s. Patria est ubicunque est bene. I have been ready
to give my life where it would not have been half so well wared, (expended)
at the pleasure of my God. I have lived out of your country ten years, as
well as in it. Let God be glorified: it will not be in your power to hang or
exile his truth." It is not said that the regent resented this bold
language; but probably his forbearance was as much owing to the circumstance
of his resigning the regency, which he did soon after, as to any other
cause.
In 1580, Melville was
translated to St Andrews, to fill a similar situation with that which he
occupied at Glasgow. Here he distinguished himself by the same ability which
had acquired him so much reputation in the western university. Besides
giving lectures on theology, he taught the Hebrew, Chaldee, Syriac, and
Rabbinical languages, and discovered such an extent of knowledge and
superiority of acquirement, that his classes were attended, not only by
young students in unusual numbers, but by several of the masters of the
other colleges. In 1582, Melville opened, with sermon, an extraordinary
meeting of the General Assembly, which had been convoked to take into
consideration the dangerous state of the protestant church, from the
influence which the earl of Arran, and the lords D’Aubigné and Lennox,
exercised over the young king. In this sermon he boldly inveighed against
the absolute authority which the court was assuming a right to exercise in
ecclesiastical affairs, and alluded to a design on the part of France, of
which D’Aubigné was the instrument, to reestablish the catholic religion in
the country. The assembly, impressed with similar sentiments, and
entertaining similar apprehensions, drew up a spirited remonstrance to the
king, and appointed Melville to present it. He accordingly repaired to
Perth, where the king then was, and, despite of some alarming reports which
reached him, of the personal danger to which he would expose himself from
the resentment of the king’s favourites, demanded and obtained access to his
majesty. When the remonstrance was read, Arran looked round the apartment,
and exclaimed, in a tone of defiance and menace, "Who dares subscribe these
treasonable articles?"—"We dare," replied Melville; and, taking a pen from
the clerk, he affixed his signature to the document: an example which was
immediately followed by the other commissioners who were with him. The cool
and dignified intrepidity of Melville, completely silenced the blustering of
Arran, who, finding himself at fault by this unexpected opposition, made no
further remark; and Lennox, with better policy, having spoken to the
commissioners in a conciliatory tone, they were peaceably dismissed. It
seems probable, however, from what afterwards ensued, that Arran did not
forget the humiliation to which Melville’s boldness had on this occasion
subjected him. In less than two years afterwards, Melville was summoned
before the privy council, on a charge of high treason, founded upon some
expressions which, it was alleged, he had made use of in the pulpit. Whether
Arran was the original instigator of the prosecution, does not very
distinctly appear; but it is certain that he took an active part in its
progress, and expressed an eager anxiety for the conviction of the accused.
Failing in establishing any thing to the prejudice of Melville, the council
had recourse to an expedient to effect that which they could not accomplish
through his indictment. They could not punish him for offences which they
could not prove; but they found him guilty of declining the judgment of the
council, and of behaving irreverently before them, and condemned him to be
imprisoned in the castle of Edinburgh, and to be further punished in person
and goods at his majesty’s pleasure. The terms of the sentence, in so far as
regarded the place of imprisonment, were afterwards altered by Arran, who
substituted "Blackness," where he had a creature of his own as keeper, for
Edinburgh. Several hours being allowed to Melville before he was put in
ward, he availed himself of the opportunity, and made his escape to England.
To this step, being himself in doubt whether he ought not rather to submit
to the sentence of the council, he was urged by some of his friends, who, to
his request for advice in the matter, replied, with the proverb of the house
of Angus, "Loose and living;" which pretty plainly intimates what they
conceived would be the result, if he permitted himself to be made "fast."
On leaving Edinburgh, Melville first proceeded to Berwick, and thence to
London, where he remained till the November of 1585. The indignation of the
kingdom having then driven Arran from the court, he returned to Scotland,
after an absence of twenty months. The plague, which had raged in the
country while he was in England, having dispersed his pupils at St Andrews,
and, the college being, from this and other causes, in a state of complete
disorganization, he did not immediately resume his duties there, but
proceeded to Glasgow, where he remained for some time. In the month of March
following, induced by an appearance of more settled times, he returned to St
Andrews, and recommenced his lectures and former course of instruction.
These, however, were soon again interrupted. In consequence of the active
part which he took in the excommunication of archbishop Adamson, who was
accused of overthrowing the scriptural government and discipline of the
church of Scotland, he was commanded by the king to leave St Andrews, and to
confine himself beyond the water of Tay. From this banishment he was soon
afterwards recalled; and, having been restored to his majesty’s favour,
through the intercession of the dean of faculty and masters of the
university, he resumed his academical labours at St Andrews.
In the year following (1587,)
he was chosen moderator of the General Assembly, and appointed one of their
commissioners to the ensuing meeting of parliament. A similar honour with
the first was conferred upon him in 1589, and again in 1594. In the year
following, he was invited to take a part in the ceremonies at the coronation
of the queen, which took place in the chapel of Holyrood, on the 17th of
May. On this occasion, although he did not know, until only two days before,
that he was expected to take a part in the approaching ceremony, he composed
and delivered, before a great concourse of noblemen and gentlemen, assembled
to witness the coronation, a Latin poem, which, having been printed next day
at the earnest solicitation of his majesty, who was much pleased with it,
under the title of "Stephaniskion," and circulated throughout Europe, added
greatly to the reputation which its author had already acquired. An instance
of the generosity of Melville’s disposition, which occurred about this time,
cannot be passed over, however brief the sketch of his life may be, without
doing an injustice to his memory. Archbishop Adamson, one of his most
irreconcilable enemies, having lost the favour of the king, was reduced, by
the sequestration of his annuity, which immediately followed, to great
pecuniary distress. He applied to Melville for relief, and he did not apply
in vain. Melville immediately visited him, and undertook to support himself
and his family at his own expense, until some more effective and permanent
assistance could be procured for him; and this he did for several months,
finally obtaining a contribution for him from his friends in St Andrews.
Such instances of benevolence are best left to the reader’s own reflections,
and are only injured by comment.
In 1590, he was chosen rector
of the university; an office which he continued to hold by re-election for
many years, and in which he displayed a firmness and decision of character
on several trying occasions, that gives him a claim to something more than a
mere literary reputation. Though a loyal subject in the best sense and most
genuine acceptation of that term, he frequently addressed king James in
language much more remarkable for its plainness than its courtesy. He had no
sympathy whatever for the absurdities of that prince, and would neither
condescend to humour his foibles nor flatter his vanity. A remarkable
instance of this plain dealing with his majesty, occurred in 1596. In that
year, Melville formed one of a deputation from the commissioners of the
General Assembly, who met at Cupar in Fife, being appointed to wait upon the
king at Falkland, for the purpose of exhorting him to prevent the
consequences of certain measures inimical to religion, which his council
were pursuing. James Melville, nephew of the subject of this memoir, was
chosen spokesman of the party, on account of the mildness of his manner and
the courteousness of his address. On entering the presence, he accordingly
began to state the object and views of the deputation. He had scarcely
commenced, however, when the king interrupted him, and in passionate
language, denounced the meeting at Cupar as illegal and seditious. James
Melville was about to reply with his usual mildness, when his uncle,
stepping forward, seized the sleeve of the king’s gown, and calling his
sacred majesty "God’s silly vassal," proceeded to lecture him on the
impropriety of his conduct, and to point out to him the course which he
ought to pursue, particularly in matters of ecclesiastical polity. "Sir," he
said, "we will always humbly reverence your majesty in public; but since we
have this occasion to be with your majesty in private, and since you are
brought in extreme danger both of your life and crown, and, along with you,
the country and the church of God are like to go to wreck, for not telling
you the truth, and giving you faithful counsel, we must discharge our duty
or else be traitors both to Christ and you. Therefore, Sir, as divers times
before I have told you, so now again I must tell you, there are two kings
and two kingdoms in Scotland: there is king James, the head of this
commonwealth, and there is Christ Jesus the king of the church, whose
subject James the Sixth is, and of whose kingdom he is not a king, nor a
lord, nor a head, but a member." Melville went on in a similar strain with
this for a great length of time, notwithstanding repeated attempts, on the
part of the king, to stop him. James expressed the strongest repugnance at
the outset to listen to him, and endeavoured to frighten him from his
purpose by a display of the terrors of offended royalty, but in vain. He was
finally compelled to listen quietly and patiently to all that Melville chose
to say. At the conclusion of the speech, the king, whose anger, and whose
courage also probably, had subsided during its delivery, made every
concession which was required; and the deputation returned without any less,
apparently, of royal favour. It was not, however, to be expected, that
Melville should have gained any ground in the king’s affections by this
display of sincerity and zeal; nor were the future interviews which took
place between them better calculated for this end. The very next which
occurred is thus alluded to in his nephew’s diary: "And ther they (the king
and Melville) hecled on, till all the hous and clos bathe hard mikle, of a
large houre. In end, the king takes upe and dismissis him favourablie."
However favourably James may
have dismissed him, he does not seem to have been unwilling to avail himself
of the first opportunity which should offer of getting rid of him. At a
royal visitation of the university of St Andrews, which soon afterwards took
place, matter of censure against Melville was eagerly sought after, and all
who felt disposed to bring any complaint against him, were encouraged to
come forward with their accusations. The result was, that a large roll,
filled with charges against him, was put into the king’s hands. He was
accused of neglecting the pecuniary affairs of the college, and the duties
of his office as a teacher, of agitating questions of policy in place of
lecturing on divinity, and of inculcating doctrines subversive of the king’s
authority and of the peace of the realm. At several strict examinations, he
gave such satisfactory explanations of his conduct, and defended himself so
effectually against the slanders of those who sought his ruin, that the
visitors were left without any ground or pretext on which to proceed against
him. They, however, deprived him of the rectorship, on the plea that it was
improper that that office should be united with the professorship of
theology, the appointment which Melville held in the university.
The accession of James to the
English throne, did not abate his desire to assume an absolute control over
the affairs of the church of Scotland, and long after his removal to
England, he continued to entertain designs hostile to its liberties. The
attempts which he had made to obtain this supremacy, while he was yet in
Scotland, had been thwarted in a great measure by the exertions of Melville.
His intrepidity kept James at bay, and his zeal, activity, and talents,
deprived him of all chance of succeeding, by chicanery or cunning. Melville
still presented himself as a stumbling-block in his way, should he attempt
to approach the Scottish church with inimical designs, and James, therefore,
now resolved that he should be entirely removed from the kingdom. To
accomplish this, he had recourse to one of those infamous and unprincipled
stratagem: which he considered the very essence of "king craft." In May
1606, Melville received a letter from his majesty, commanding him to repair
to London before the 15th of September next, that his majesty might consult
with him, and others of his learned brethren, regarding ecclesiastical
matters, with the view of healing all differences, and securing a good
understanding between his majesty and the church. Letters of a similar tenor
were received by seven other clergymen, amongst whom was Melville’s nephew.
Though not without some
doubts regarding the result of this rather extraordinary invitation,
Melville and his brethren set out for London, where they arrived on the 25th
of August. The first interview of the Scottish clergymen with the king was
sufficiently gracious. He inquired for news from Scotland, and condescended
even to be jocular. This, however, did not last long; at the subsequent
conferences Melville found himself called upon, by the sentiments which the
king expressed regarding church matters, to hold the same bold and plain
language to him which he had so often done in Scotland, and this too in the
presence of great numbers of his English courtiers, who could not refrain
from expressing their admiration of Melville’s boldness, and of the
eloquence with which he delivered his sentiments. In the mean time, however,
the Scottish ministers were interdicted from returning to Scotland without
the special permission of the king. On the 28th September they were required
by his majesty to give attendance in the royal chapel on the following day
to witness the celebration of the festival of St Michael. The ceremonies and
fooleries of the exhibition which took place on this occasion, were so
absurd, and so nearly approached those of the Romish church, that they
excited in Melville a feeling of the utmost indignation and contempt. This
feeling he expressed in a Latin epigram, which he composed on returning to
his lodgings. A copy of the lines found its way to his majesty, who was
greatly incensed by them, and determined to proceed against their author on
the ground that they were treasonable. He was accordingly summoned before
the privy council, found guilty of scandalum magnatum, and after a
confinement of nearly twelve months, first in the house of the dean of St
Paul’s, and afterwards in that of the bishop of Winchester, was committed to
the Tower, where he remained a prisoner for four years. The other clergymen
who had accompanied Melville to London were allowed to return to Scotland;
but they were confined to particular parts of the country, and forbidden to
attend any church courts. Melville’s nephew was commanded to leave London
within six days, and to repair to Newcastle upon Tyne, and not to go ten
miles beyond that town on the pain of rebellion.
In the month of February,
1611, Melville was released from the Tower on the application of the duke of
Bouillon, who had solicited his liberty from the king, in order to procure
his services as a professor in his university at Sedan in France. Melville,
who was now in the 66th year of his age, was exceedingly reluctant to go
abroad; but, as this was a condition of his liberty, and as there was no
hope of the king’s being prevailed upon to allow him to return to Scotland,
he submitted to the expatriation, and sailed for France on the 19th of
April.
On his arrival at Paris he
was fortunate enough to fall in with one of his scholars then prosecuting
his studies there, by whom he was kindly and affectionately received. After
spending a few days in the French capital he repaired to Sedan, and was
admitted to the place destined for him in the university.
In the year following he
removed to Grenoble, to superintend the education of three sons of the
treasurer of the parliament of Dauphiny, with a salary of five hundred
crowns per annum; but, not finding the situation an agreeable one, he
returned within a short time to Sedan, and resumed his former duties.
Melville continued to maintain a close correspondence with his numerous
friends in Scotland, and particularly with his nephew, James Melville, to
whom he was warmly attached. Of him, his best, most constant, and dearest
friend, however, he was soon to be deprived. That amiable man, who had
adhered to him through good and bad fortune, through storm and sunshine, for
a long series of years, died in the beginning of the year 1614. The grief of
Melville on receiving the intelligence of his death was deep and poignant.
He gave way to no boisterous expression of feeling; but he felt the
deprivation with all the keenness which such a calamity is calculated to
inflict on an affectionate heart. With his fondest wishes still directed
towards his native land, he requested his friends in London to embrace any
favourable opportunity which might offer of procuring his restoration; and
in 1616, a promise was obtained from his majesty, that he would be relieved
from banishment. This, promise, however, like many others of James’s, was
never realized. Melville, after all that he had done for his country, was
doomed to breathe his last an exile in a foreign land. To compensate in some
measure for the misfortunes which clouded his latter days, he was blessed
with a more than ordinary share of bodily health, and that to a later period
of life than is often to be met with. "Am I not," he says, in a letter to a
friend written in the year 1612, "three score and eight years old, unto the
which age none of my fourteen brethren came; and, yet I thank God, I eat, I
drink, I sleep as well as I did these thirty years bygone, and better than
when I was younger—in ipso flore adolescentiae,—only the gravel now
and then seasons my mirth with some little pain, which I have felt only
since the beginning of March the last year, a month before my deliverance
from prison. I feel, thank God, no abatement of the alacrity and ardour of
my mind for the propagation of the truth. Neither use I spectacles now more
than ever, yea I use none at all nor ever did, and see now to read Hebrew
without points, and in the smallest characters." With this good bodily
health, he also enjoyed to the close of his life that cheerfulness of
disposition and vivacity of imagination for which he was distinguished in
earlier years, and in the seventy-fourth year of his age he is found vying
with the most sprightly and juvenile of his colleagues in the composition of
an epithalamium on the occasion of the marriage of the eldest daughter of
his patron the duke of Bouillon.
Years, however, at length
undermined a constitution which disease had left untouched until the very
close of life. In 1620, his health which had previously been slightly
impaired, grew worse, and in the course of the year 1622, he died at Sedan,
in the seventy-seventh year of his age.
The benefits which Melville
conferred on his country in the department of its literature are thus spoken
of by Dr M’Crie: "His arrival imparted a new impulse to the public mind, and
his reputation for learning, joined to the enthusiasm with which he pleaded
its cause, enabled him to introduce an improved plan of study into all the
universities. By his instructions and example, he continued and increased
the impulse which he had first given to the minds of his countrymen. In
languages, in theology, and in that species of poetical composition which
was then most practiced among the learned, his influence was direct and
acknowledged." The services which he rendered the civil and religious
liberties of his country are recorded by the same able author in still
stronger terms. "If the love of pure religion," he says, "rational liberty,
and polite letters, forms the basis of national virtue and happiness, I know
no individual, after her reformer, from whom Scotland has received greater
benefits, and to whom she owes a deeper debt of gratitude and respect, than
Andrew Melville."
Andrew Melville
By William Morison (text file) |