| |
Significant Scots
Alexander Hume |
HUME, ALEXANDER, second earl of
Marchmont, the eldest surviving son and successor of the first earl,
having maintained the historical luster of the family, deserves a place
in the present work, though only perhaps in a subordinate way. He was
born in 1675, and in his boyhood shared the exile and distress of his
family. Before his elder brother’s death, he was distinguished as Sir
Alexander Campbell of Cessnock, having married the daughter and heiress
of that family. He was brought up as a lawyer, and became a judge of the
court of session before he was thirty years of age. He was a privy
councillor and a baron of the court of Exchequer, and served in the
Scottish parliament, first for Kirkwall, and then for Berwickshire, when
the act of union passed. Emulating his father’s feelings, he zealously
promoted that measure, and took a very active share in the arduous
labours that were devolved upon the sub-committee, to which the articles
of the union were referred. But the
principal historical transaction in which this nobleman was concerned,
was the introduction of the family of Hanover to the British throne. A
report having been circulated that the electoral family was indifferent
to the honours opened up to them by the act of succession, lord Polwarth,
(for he had now attained this designation,) proceeded in 1712, to
Hanover, and entered into a correspondence with the august family there
resident, which enabled him fully to contradict the rumour. He took a
leading part in suppressing the rebellion of 1715, by which that
succession was sought to be defeated, and, in 1716, was rewarded for his
services, by being appointed ambassador to the court of Denmark.
After acceding to the family honours in 1722, the
earl of Marchmont was honoured with several important places of trust
under government, till joining the opposition against the excise scheme
of Sir Robert Walpole, he forfeited the favour of the court and his
place as a privy councillor, which he then held. "It appears," says Sir
George Henry Rose, [Preface to Marchmont Papers.] "that the
distinguished members of the Scottish nobility who joined in this act of
hostility to the ministers, were less induced so to do by any particular
objections to that measure of finance, than by the hope, that their
junction with the English who resisted it, might lead to the subversion
of lord Ilay’s government of Scotland, a rule which they felt to be
painful and humiliating. They knew it moreover to be sustained by means,
many of which they could not respect, and which they believed to tend to
degrade and alienate the nation. That they judged rightly in
apprehending that the system adopted by Sir Robert Walpole and his
virtual viceroy, for the management of the public affairs in North
Britain, was ill calculated to conciliate to the reigning family the
affections of the people, was but too sufficiently proved by subsequent
events. He sat as one of the sixteen Scots peers in the parliament of
1727; but at the general election in 1754, the hand of power was upon
him; and, being excluded, he, together with the dukes of Hamilton,
Queensberry, and Montrose, and earl of Stair, and other Scottish
noblemen, entered into a concert with the leading English members of the
opposition, in order to bring the machinations unsparingly used to
control the election of the peers in Scotland, to light, and their
authors to punishment. Sir Robert Walpole’s better fortune, however,
prevailed against it, as it did against a similar project in 1739." The
earl of Marchmont died in January, 1740, and was succeeded by his eldest
surviving son Hugh, who was destined to exhibit the extraordinary
spectacle of a family, maintaining, in the third generation, the same
talent, judgment, and worth which had distinguished the two preceding. |
Return
to our Significant Scots page
|