The circumstances of Mr. Gladstone's political career
help to explain, or, at
any rate, will furnish occasion for the attempt to explain, this
complexity and variety of character. But before we come to his manhood it
is convenient to advert to three conditions whose influence on him has
been profound: the first his Scottish blood, the second his Oxford
education, the third his apprenticeship to public life under Sir Robert
Peel. Theories of character based on race differences are dangerous,
because they are so easy to form and so hard to test. Still, no one
denies that there are qualities and tendencies generally found in the
minds of men of certain stocks, just as there are peculiarities in their
faces or in their speech. Mr. Gladstone was born and brought up in
Liverpool, and always retained a touch of Lancashire accent. But, as he
was fond of saying, every drop of blood in his veins was Scotch. His
father was a Lowland Scot from the neighborhood of Biggar, in the Upper
Ward of Lanarkshire, where the old yeoman's dwelling of Gledstanes--"the
kite's rock"--may still be seen. His mother was of Highland extraction,
by name Robertson, from Dingwall, in Ross-shire. Thus he was not only a
Scot, but a Scot with a strong infusion of the Celtic element, the
element whence the Scotch derive most of what distinguishes them from the
English. The Scot is more excitable, more easily brought to a glow of
passion, more apt to be eagerly absorbed in one thing at a time. He is
also more fond of abstract intellectual effort. It is not merely that the
taste for metaphysical theology is commoner in Scotland than in England,
but that the Scotch have a stronger relish for general principles. They
like to set out by ascertaining and defining such principles, and then to
pursue a series of logical deductions from them. They are, therefore,
somewhat bolder reasoners than the English, less content to remain in the
region of concrete facts, more eager to hasten on to the process of
working out a body of speculative doctrines. The Englishman is apt to
plume himself on being right in spite of logic; the Scotchman delights to
think that it is through logic he has reached his conclusions, and that
he can by logic defend them. These are qualities which Mr. Gladstone drew
from his Scottish blood. He had a keen enjoyment of the processes of
dialectic. He loved to get hold of an abstract principle and to derive
all sorts of conclusions from it. He was wont to begin the discussion of
a question by laying down two or three sweeping propositions covering the
subject as a whole, and would then proceed to draw from these others
which he could apply to the particular matter in hand. His well-stored
memory and boundless ingenuity made this finding of such general
propositions so easy a task that a method in itself agreeable sometimes
appeared to be carried to excess. He frequently arrived at conclusions
which the judgment of the sober auditor did not approve, because,
although they seemed to have been legitimately deduced from the general
principles just enunciated, they were somehow at variance with the plain
teaching of the facts. At such moments one felt that the man who was
charming but perplexing Englishmen by his subtlety and ingenuity was not
himself an Englishman in mental quality, but had the love for
abstractions and refinements and dialectical analysis which characterizes
the Scotch intellect. He had also a large measure of that warmth and
vehemence, called in the sixteenth century the perfervidum ingenium
Scotorum, which belong to the Scottish temperament, and particularly to
the Celtic Scot. He kindled quickly, and when kindled, he shot forth a
strong and brilliant flame. To any one with less power of self-control
such intensity of emotion as he frequently showed would have been
dangerous; nor did this excitability fail, even with him, to prompt words
and acts which a cooler judgment would have disapproved. But it gave that
spontaneity which was one of the charms of his nature; it produced that
impression of profound earnestness and of resistless force which raised
him out of the rank of ordinary statesmen. The tide of emotion swelling
fast and full seemed to turn the whole rushing stream of intellectual
effort into whatever channel lay at the moment nearest.
With these
Scottish qualities, Mr. Gladstone was brought up at school and college
among Englishmen, and received at Oxford, then lately awakened from a
long torpor, a bias and tendency which never thereafter ceased to affect
him. The so-called "Oxford Movement," which afterward obtained the name
of Tractarianism and carried Dr. Newman, together with other less famous
leaders, on to Rome, had not yet, in 1831, when Mr. Gladstone won his
degree with double first-class honors, taken visible shape, or become,
so to speak, conscious of its own purposes. But its doctrinal views, its
peculiar vein of religious sentiment, its respect for antiquity and
tradition, its proneness to casuistry, its taste for symbolism, were
already potent influences working on the more susceptible of the younger
minds. On Mr. Gladstone they told with full force. He became, and never
ceased to be, not merely a High-churchman, but what may be called an
Anglo-Catholic, in his theology, deferential not only to ecclesiastical
tradition, but to the living voice of the visible church, respecting the
priesthood as the recipients (if duly ordained) of a special grace and
peculiar powers, attaching great importance to the sacraments, feeling
himself nearer to the Church of Rome, despite what he deemed her
corruptions, than to any of the non-episcopal Protestant churches.
Henceforth his interests in life were as much ecclesiastical as
political. For a time he desired tobe ordained a clergyman. Had this
wish been carried out, it can scarcely be doubted that he would
eventually have become the leading figure in the Church of England and
have sensibly affected her recent history. The later stages in his career
drew him away from the main current of political opinion within that
church. He who had been the strongest advocate of established churches
came to bethe leading agent in the disestablishment of the Protestant
Episcopal Church in Ireland, and a supporter of the policy of
disestablishment in Scotland and in Wales. But the color which these
Oxford years gave to his mind and thoughts was never obliterated. They
widened the range of his interests and deepened his moral zeal and
religious earnestness. But at the same time they confirmed his natural
bent toward over-subtle distinctions and fine-drawn reasonings, and they
put him somewhat out of sympathy not only with the attitude of the
average Englishman, who is essentially a Protestant,--that is to say,
averse to sacerdotalism, and suspicious of any other religious authority
than that of the Bible and the individual conscience,--but also with two
of the strongest influences of our time, the influence of the sciences of
nature, and the influence of historical criticism. Mr. Gladstone, though
too wise to rail at science, as many religious men did till within the
last few years, could never quite reconcile himself either to the
conclusions of geology and zoology regarding the history of the physical
world and the animals which inhabit it, or to the modern methods of
critical inquiry as applied to Scripture and to ancient literature
generally. The training which Oxford then gave, stimulating as it was,
and free from the modern error of overspecialization, was defective in
omitting the experimental sciences, and in laying undue stress upon the
study of language. A proneness to dwell on verbal distinctions and to
trust overmuch to the analysis of terms as a means of reaching the truth
of things is noticeable in many eminent Oxford writers of that and the
next succeeding generation--some of them, like the illustrious F. D.
Maurice, far removed from Dr. Newman and Mr. Gladstone in theological
opinion. When the brilliant young Oxonian entered the House of
Commons at the age of twenty-three, Sir Robert Peel was leading the Tory
party with an authority and ability rarely surpassed in parliamentary
annals. Within two years the young man was admitted into the short-lived
Tory ministry of 1834, and soon proved himself an active and promising
lieutenant of the experienced chief. Peel was an eminently wary and
cautious man, alive to the necessity of watching the signs of the times,
of studying and interpreting the changeful phases of public opinion. His
habit was to keep his own counsel, and even when he perceived that the
policy he had hitherto followed would need to be modified, to continue to
use guarded language and refuse to commit himself to change till he
perceived that the fitting moment had arrived. He was, moreover, a master
of detail, slow to propound a plan until he had seen how its outlines
were to be filled up by appropriate devices for carrying it out in
practice. These qualities and habits of the minister profoundly affected
his gifted disciple. They became part of the texture of his own
political character, and in his case, as in that of Peel, they sometimes
brought censure upon him, as having withheld too long from the public
views or purposes which he thought it unwise to disclose till effect
could promptly be given to them. Such reserve, such a guarded attitude
and conservative attachment to existing institutions, were not altogether
natural to Mr. Gladstone's mind, and the contrast between them and some
of his other qualities, like the contrast which ultimately appeared
between his sacerdotal tendencies and his political liberalism,
contributed to make his character perplexing and to expose his conduct to
the charge of inconsistency. Inconsistent, in the ordinary sense of the
word, he was not, much less changeable. He was really, in the main
features of his political convictions and the main habits of his mind,
one of the most tenacious and persistent of men. But there were always at
work in him two tendencies. One was the speculative desire to probe
everything to the bottom, to try it by the light of general principles
and logic, and where it failed to stand this test, to reject it. The
other was the sense of the complexity of existing social and political
arrangements, and of the risk of disturbing anyone part of them unless
the time had arrived for resettling other parts also. Every statesman
feels both these sides to every concrete question of reform. No one has
set them forth more cogently, and in particular no one has more earnestly
dwelt on the necessity for the latter, than the most profound thinker
among English statesmen, Edmund Burke. Mr. Gladstone, however, felt and
stated them with quite unusual force, and when he stated the one side,
people forgot that there was another which would be no less vividly
present to him at some other moment. He was not only, like all successful
parliamentarians, necessarily something of an opportunist, though perhaps
less so than his master Peel, but was moved by emotion more than most
statesmen, and certainly more than Peel. The relative strength with which
the need for comprehensive reform or the need for watchful conservatism
presented itself to his mind depended largely upon the weight which his
emotions cast into one or the other scale, and this element made it
difficult to forecast his probable action. Thus his political character
was the result of influences differing widely in their
origin--influences, moreover, which it was hard for ordinary observers to
appreciate. |