After the failure of a
convention, in which Paul III. was mediator between those two great
princes, their armies again took the field in the spring of 1554. Henry
first led his troops against Marienbourg in Hainault, while the
constable, with the main body, marched towards Liege, by the famous
forest of Ardennes. Kirkaldy, with his troop of demi-lances, accompanied
this column of the army.
Twelve years before, Marienbourg had been built and strongly fortified
by the Emperor Charles, and named in honour of his sister, Mary of
Hungary. Six days after the French standard was displayed before its
towers, it was surrendered by the Spanish garrison to Henry, who, elated
with success, pushed on to Namur and seized Bouvines, which he totally
sacked and ruined. He had now formed a junction with the column of the
constable.
Two miles above the desolate Bouvines stood (and yet stands) Dinant, a
small but ancient city, surrounded by an old wall of the twelfth
century. It had a strong castle, perched on a high and precipitous rock,
which commanded a noted pass between Namur and Luxembourg, and formed
the key of the German empire towards France. Near it, a bridge spanned
the sluggish waters of the Maesc, but the passage was swept by the
cannon of the little fortlet, which a brave Spanish cavalier defended,
with unflinching valour, against the whole French army. Thrice he
repulsed the well-disciplined infantry from a breach their cannon had
effected in the outer walls; and eleven standard-bearers, who led les
enfans perdus up the jagged rocks to the assault, were shot down in
succession by the tremendous fire of harquebusses, calivers, and
pistolettes, poured on the gap by the resolute Spaniards.
Appalled by the slaughter, the French soldiers wavered, and some even
refused to follow those brave chevaliers who, each in succession, took
the standard from the hand of his dead predecessor. The constable
entreated, threatened, and encouraged by turns—still they recoiled. At
this crisis Archibald Mowbray, (brother of Sir John of Bamebougal, who
married Elizabeth Kirkaldy,) to show the soldiers an example, rushed
sword in hand, and alone, up the steep and dangerous breach, and gained
the top of the shattered wall; but, not being followed, he was compelled
to retire, and regained his comrades untouched.
Driven at last to extremity, after the whole of his soldiers had been
killed or wounded by the shot of the French culverins, or scorched by
the fagots goudronnes and blazing firebrands which the cannoneers threw
into the fortress in showers on their helmeted heads, the brave Spanish
castellan made a sign of parley, and came forth to confer with the
constable concerning a surrender. Contrary to the rules of war, he was
made prisoner; upon which the wounded survivors of his little garrison
marched forth with bag and baggage. This was on the 28th of June 1554.
The castle of Dinant was immediately demolished; but more regular
fortifications were, in succeeding wars, erected in its stead.
Having thus forced the pass, King Henry, at the head of his army, turned
to the left, towards Artois, and marched into the Low Countries, his
soldiers giving all to fire and sword, after they had pillaged the
cities and villages of the opulent and industrious Netherlands. Plunder
and devastation in that age, as in much later times, were ever the
concomitants of French warfare; but want of subsistence soon compelled
Henry to retreat back upon his own frontier, during which his army
utterly destroyed all that had escaped the fury of their advance.
In these famous wars between two of the greatest princes in Europe, Sir
William Kirkaldy, at the head of his Chevaux Legers, had a thousand
opportunities of acquiring that knowledge of the tactics and discipline
of the time, which in after life enabled him to win the field of
Langside, with a few hundred men to hold in defiance the powers of a
kingdom, and to accomplish other deeds of skill and courage which have
rendered his name so familiar in the annals of Scotland.
In those days the standing forces of France were very different from the
feudal militia of Scotland and England. On the subversion of feudality
in France, a permanent and numerous army had been embodied, adequate to
kingly schemes of conquest and ambition, and effective for the
suppression of treason at home. The other sovereigns of Europe soon
found that standing armies were the necessary base and harrier of a
throne. Bodies of soldiers were maintained in constant pay; heavy taxes
were imposed for their subsistence; duty and discipline became reduced
to a standard and universal rule, and the art of war became improved in
all its phases.
The troops of France, at the time of which I write, consisted, first, of
the Scottish Guard, composed of a hundred hommes d’armes, a hundred
archers of the guard, and twenty-four of the corps. These braves, who
were commanded by James earl of Arran, (son of the regent, recently
created Duke of Chatelherault,) — the same young noble whom the
Kirkaldys and their companions had detained in the castle of St
Andrews—were the elite of Scotland, and their high reputation for
fidelity and unblemished honour requires no comment. They wore the most
splendid armour of the age, with surcoats or hoquetons covered with
shells of silver gilt: their banner was the national standard of
Scotland. The foot-harquebussiers, armed with helmets, hack and breast
plates, bore firearms which threw halls three ounces in weight; hut the
majority of the army were pikemen, and styled les comjpognies
ddialberdiers, or free companies; which, though detached and separate,
were all commanded by an officer called the captain-general of les
comjpagnies Franches, who was first appointed in 1550. The culverineers
wore a habergeon with sleeves, a gourgerin and salade, with a sword and
dagger. But the flower of the army were the plumed and helmeted
gendarmerie, a body of steel-clad cavalry unsurpassed in discipline, in
spirit, and in bravery, gallantly mounted on mailed steeds, and
brilliantly accoutred. The first troop of these were les gens-d'armes
Ecossois.
There was also a body of men-at-arms clad cap-a-pie, and armed with
cross-bows and battle-axes; hut, during Henry’s reign, those antiquated
weapons gradually gave place to more modern inventions. In those days
the armour of nations was all very much alike, distinctions being
principally shown by banners, the housings of horses, and the scarfs of
their riders. Those of the French and Scots were white: the modern
military sash is the representation of the knightly scarf of the olden
time. The French standard was the ancient oriflamme, with its silver
lilies; the cornette blanche was only displayed when the king led the
army in person, as every king should do. "Montjoye! Saint Denis for
France!” was the rallying-shout of the French on joining close battle ;
but war-cries were rapidly being abolished on the Continent : the
Scottish clans retained them until the middle of the last century.
Regular regiments, as now constituted, were not embodied until 1562,
when the six old battalions of Picardy, Piedmont, Navarre, Champagne,
Normandy, and the Marine, were formed from the ancient companies, or
bandes Francoises, of the old system. But to resume: —
While the troops of Henry were devastating the archhishoprick of Cambray,
Charles V. mustered an army with the utmost expedition; and immediately
upon his advancing, the French, being pressed by want of subsistence, as
before stated, began to retreat homewaid. Louis de Bourbon, lord of
Chateau-Roux and prince of Conde—a title he bad obtained seven years
before, in consequence of marrying the heiress of the ancient lords of
Conde—with many other princes of the royal blood, bore distinguished
commands in Henry’s army at this time.
On one occasion, Charles sent forward five thousand Spanish horsemen, to
gall and impede the French rearguard, which was commanded by the
constable. These came up with Kirkaldy’s branch of the army, the light
horse, when they were covering the flanks of a body of infantry which
were fording a river not far from Cambray. To halt, to form, and receive
them with levelled pikes and volleying harquebusses, was, to the veteran
constable, the work of a moment. Seconded by the pikes and petronels of
the Chevaux Logers, he drove them back with such loss, that the
cavaliers of the emperor were more wary in pressing on the French rear
during the remainder of that severe retreat.
On reaching Renti, a town situated between two mountains on the confines
of the Bulonnois and Artois, and commanded by a strong feudal castle,
the army of France halted and encamped. Henry, that he might not
disperse his troops without attempting something to fulfil the sanguine
hopes with which he had opened the campaign, resolved on laying siege to
this important fortress, from the ramparts of which the banner of the
Spanish emperor was displayed at his approach. He Montmorencie opened
the trenches, and pushed the siege vigorously, having promised to Henry
that he should have it' in eight days. This promise was never performed.
The castle of Renti was ably fortified and provided with a numerous
garrison, who, assisted by the occupants of the city, made a resolute
defence.
Though suffering under a severe illness, Charles, borne in a litter at
the head of his whole available force, hastened to its relief; upon
which the constable—anxious to decide the fate of the siege by an
engagement—drew up in order of battle the whole of the gendarmerie, the
lances of the ordnance, and all the horse of the army, resolving with
them alone, on well-chosen ground, to stand the shock of the Spaniards,
while his infantry pressed the siege with renewed energy.
The battle took place on the plain before Renti, on the 31st August
1554. The French gained a signal victory; but Norman Leslie was doomed
to fall, covered with wounds and glory, in which his friend Kirkaldy
could not participate, as he was despatched by King Henry on a patrole,
or secret and particular duty, the night before the encounter. The day
before the battle, the constable, perceiving by the manoeuvres of the
Spanish troops that Charles meant to take possession of certain heights,
which sloped abruptly down to the camp or bivouac of the French, sent up
Leslie’s Scottish lances and other horsemen to skirmish with these
Imperialists, and drive themback. Melville, his fellow-soldier, thus
describes him :—In view of the whole French army, the Master of Rothes,
u with thirty Scotsmen, rode up the hill upon a fair gray gelding. He
had, above his coat of black velvet, his coat of armour, with' two broad
white crosses, one before and the other behind, with sleeves of mail,
and a red bonnet upon his head, whereby he was seen and known afar off
by the constable, the Duke d’Enghien, and the Prince of Conde.” His
party was diminished to seven by the time he came within lance-length of
the Imperialists, who were sixty in number; but he burst upon them with
the force of a thunderbolt, escaping the fire of their hand-culverins,
which they discharged incessantly against him. He struck five from their
saddles with his long lance, before it broke into splinters then,
drawing his sword, he rushed again and again among them, with the
heedless bravery for which he had ever been distinguished. At the
critical moment of this unequal contest, of seven Scottish knights
against sixty Spaniards, a troop of Imperial spearmen were hastily
riding along the hill to join in the encounter. By this time Leslie had
received several bullets in his person; and finding himself unable to
continue the conflict longer, he dashed spurs into his horse, galloped
back to the constable, and fell, faint and exhausted, from his saddle,
with the blood pouring through his burnished armour on the turf.
By the king’s desire he was immediately borne to the royal tent, where
the Duke d’Enghien and Prince Louis of Conde remarked to Henry, that a
Hector of Troy had not behaved more valiantly than Norman Leslie.”
The chirurgeon of the royal household dressed his wounds; but his
attentions were vain, for the hand of death was now upon the heart of
the gallant Leslie. This brave warrior was the son of George fourth earl
of Rothes, by Margaret, daughter of the Lord Crichton, to whom he had
been betrothed, or hand-fasted, but not canonically married; yet Norman
was always designed the Master of Rothes, and as such obtained several
charters of land under the Great Seal of Scotland. By his wife Isabel,
daughter of Lord Lindesay of the Byres, he left no heirs, and his
half-brother Andrew obtained the earldom. Being borne off the field, he
expired of his wounds in the city of Montreuil, fifteen days after the
battle, repenting bitterly, with his last breath, his share in the
murder of Cardinal Beatoun.
The king, the constable, and the whole army, acknowledged his worth,
respected his valour, and lamented his fate ; but none sorrowed for him
more than Kirkaldy of Grange, who next day returned to the camp with his
campagnie de cent lances, after performing the duty upon which the king
had despatched him.
He arrived in time to share the dangers and the triumph of Renti, two
miles distant from which the Spanish emperor formed a camp, intrenching
it on every side save one, where a steep and inaccessible hill sloped
downward to the French position. Both armies had strong outguards, and a
battle was confidently expected on the day succeeding Leslie’s exploit.
In the night the Imperialists took possession of a wood, which extended
along the face of a hill that lay between the two camps. |