"Full credit has been
awarded the Roundhead and the Cavalier; nor have we been altogether blind
to the deeds of the Hollander and the Huguenote; but it is doubtful if we
have wholly realised the importance of the part played by that stern and
virile people whose preachers taught the creed of Knox and Calvin. These
representatives of the Covenanters were in the West almost what the
Puritans were in the Northeast and more than the Cavaliers were in the
South. They formed the kernel of the distictively and intensely American
stock who were the pioneers of our people in their march Westwards."
Theodore Roosevelt, Winning
of the West, v. 1.
SCOTTISH emigration to America came
in two streams—one direct from the mother-land and the
other through the province of Ulster in
Ireland. Those who came by this second
route are usually known as ‘‘UlsterScots,’’ or more commonly as
"Scotch-Irish," and they have been claimed by Irish writers in the United
States as Irishmen. This is perhaps excusable, but hardly just. The
constantly reiterated assertion that these emigrants were Irishmen is due
to the fact, patent to all lustorical investigators, that apart from these
Ulster-Scots Ireland proper has contributed only a very few individuals of
outstanding prominence in American history.
Throughout their residence in Ireland the Scots
preserved their distinctive Scottish characteristics. They did not
intermarry with the native Irish, though they did intermarry to some
extent with the English Puritans and with the French Huguenots. These
Huguenots were colonies driven out of France by the Revocation of the
Edict of Nantes in 1685, and induced to settle in the North of Ireland by
William III. To them Ireland is indebted for its lace industry, which they
introduced into the country.
"In Ireland the Scottish immigrants remained as
distinct from the native population as if they had never crossed the
Channel. They were among the Irish, but not of them."
Again, many Irish-American writers on the Scots
Plantation of Ulster have assumed that the Scots settlers were entirely or
almost of Gaelic origin, ignoring the fact, if they were aware of it, that
the people of the Scottish lowlands were "almost as English in racial
derivation as if they had come from the north of England" (Ford. p 82).
Parker, the historian of Londonderry, New Hampshire, speaking of the early
Scottish settlers in New England, has well said: "Although they came to
this land from Ireland, where their ancestors had a century before planted
themselves, yet they retained unmixed the national Scotch character.
Nothing sooner offended them than to be called Irish. Their antipathy to
this application had its origin in the hostility then existing in Ireland
between the Celtic race, the native Irish, and the English and Scotch
colonists’’ (History of Londonderry, N. H., Boston, 1851, p. 68). On the
same page Parker gives a letter from the Rev. James
MacGregor to Governor Shute. in
which the writer says:
We are surprised
to hear ourselves termed Irish people, when we so
frequently ventured our all for the British Crown
and liberties against the Irish Papists and gave all
tests of our loyalty which the Government of Ireland
required, and are always ready to do the same when required.’’
If we must continue to use the hyphen when
referring to these early immigrants it is preferable
to use the term
"Ulster-Scot" instead of "ScotchIrish.’’ as has been
pointed out by the late Whitelaw Reid. because it does not confuse the
race with the accident of birth, and because the people l)referred it
themselves. ‘‘If these Scottish and Presbyterian colonists,’’ he says,
‘‘must be called Irish because they had been one or two generations in the
North of Ireland, then the Pilgrim Fathers, who had been one generation or
more in Holland, must by the same reasoning be called Dutch or at the very
least English-Dutch" (Reid, p. 23).
To understand the reasons for the Scots colonization of
Ulster and the later replantation in America it is necessary to look back
three centuries in British history.
On the crushing of the Irish rebellion under Sir Cahir
O’Dogherty in 1607. King James I of England adopted the experiment which
on a smaller scale he had tried in the Isle of Lewis in 1598. Under his
direction the Province of Ulster was divided into lots and offered on
certain conditions to colonists from England. Circumstances, however,
turned what was mainly intended to be an English enterprise into a
Scottish one. Scottish participation ‘‘which does not seem to have been
originally regarded as important,’’ became eventually, as Ford points out
(p. 32), the mainstay of the enterprise. ‘Although froni the first there
was an understanding between (Sir Arthur) Chichester and the English Privy
Council that eventually the plantation would be opened to Scotch settlers,
no steps were taken in that direction until the plan had been matured. . .
. The first public announcement of any Scottish connection with the Ulster
plantation appears in a letter of March 19, 1609, from Sir Alexander Hay,
the Scottish secretary resident at the English Court, to the Scottish
Privy ( Council at Edinburgh ‘ (Ford, p. 33). In this communication Hay
announced that his Majesty ‘‘out of his unspeakable love and tender
affection’’ for his Scottish subjects had decided that they were to be
allowed a share, and he adds, that here is a great opportunity for
Scotland since we haiff greitt advantage of transporting of our men and
bestiall (i.e., live stock of a farm) in regard we live so near to that
coiste of Ulster’’ (Register of the Privy Council of Scotland, v. 8, pp.
268, 794).
Immediately on receipt of this letter the Scottish
Privy Council made public Proclamation of the news and announced that
those of them ‘‘quho ar disposit to tak ony land in Yreland’’ were to
present their desires and petitions to the Council. By the middle of
September seventy-seven Scots came forward as purchasers, and if their
offers had been accepted, they would have possessed among them 141,000
acres of land. In the following year, in consequence of a re-arrangement
of applicants the number of favoured Scots was reduced to fifty-nine, with
81,000 acres of land at their disposal. Among the fifty-nine were the Duke
of Lennox, the Earl of Abercorn, Lord d’Aubigny, Lord Burley, and Lord
Ochiltree. (The full list of Scottish undertakers is printed
in the Register of the Privy Council.
v. 8,
pp. lxxxviii-xci, and
the amended list in v. 9, pp. Lxxx-lxxxi.
Measures were carefully taken that the settlers
selected should be "from the inwards parts of Scotland," and that they
should be so located in Ulster that ‘‘they may not
mix nor inter-marry’’ with ‘‘the mere Irish.’’
For the most part the settlers were selected from
Dumbartonshire, Renfrewshire, Ayrshire, Galloway, and Dumfriesshire.
The colonists of course did not at once proceed in a
body to their new homes, but a steady stream of emigration must have been
kept up, as Gardiner the historian says that in 1640 it was estimated that
there were 40,000 ablebodied Scots in the north of Ireland. Sir William
Petty states "that a very large emigration had taken
place from Scotland after Cromwell settled the country
in 1652," and, writing in 1672. he estimates the Scots
population of Ireland at 100,000, mainly concentrated in Ulster. "Before
the Ulster plantation began there was
already a considerable Scottish occupation of the region
nearest to Scotland. These Scotch settlements were confined to
Counties Down and Antrim, which were
not included in the scheme of the plantation. Their existence facilitated
Scottish emigration to the plantation, and they were
influential in giving the plantation the Scottish character which
it promptly acquired. Athough planned to be in
the main an English settlement, with
one whole county turned over to
the City of London alone, it soon became
in the main a Scottish settlement’’ (Ford, p. 79).
\Vriting of these hardy Scots, Froude the historian has
well and truly said: ‘‘They
went over to earn a living by labour, in a land
which had produced hitherto little but banditti. They built towns
and villages, they established trades
and manufactures, they enclosed fields, raised farmhouses and homesteads
where till then there had been but robbers’ castles, wattled huts, or
holes in the earth like rabbit-burrows. While
without artificial distinctions. they were saved from degenerating into
the native type by their religion then growing in its first enthusiasm
into a living power which pervaded their entire being."
The eagerness with which the Scots embraced the
opportunity to colonize in Ulster was due to the
necessity for an outlet to the energies of the people. For
centuries indeed before the beginning of the
plantation of Ulster the adventurous spirit of the
Scots had led them all over Europe in search
of adventure or gain. As a rule, says
Harrison (Scots in Ulster, p. 1), the
Scot turned his steps where
fighting was to be had, and the pay for killing
was reasonably good.’’ The glorious records of
the Scots men-at-arms and lifeguards in France,
formed in 1418, are but one chapter in this history. The battle of Baugé,
fought in 1421, ranks next to Bannockburn among Scottish victories. in
this battle the Scottish legion in the service of France covered
themselves with glory through their victory over their "old inemeys of
Ingland," as an old chronicler calls the English. To the life-guards of
France add the equally famous Scots brigade in the
service of the United Netherlands, which dantit mightily the proud hosts
of Spain in the Low Countries during the last quarter of the sixteenth
century.
In the more peaceful channels of commerce the influence
of the Scots on the continent has been deep and widespread. Some idea of
the extent of the early Scottish colonization of central and eastern
Europe may be gleaned from the remark of William Lithgow, the celebrated
traveller, who visited Poland about 1625, that there were ‘‘thirty
thousand Scots families’’ in that country, and that Poland was the ‘‘nurse
of Scotland’s common younglings’’ (Advenures and Painful Peregrinations,
London, 1632. p. 422). One interesting illustration of the Scottish
influence on the commercial life of eastern Europe may here be mentioned.
in the Lithuanian language the name for a pedlar is szalas. As most of the
trade of Lithuania was carried on by Scots we have little difficulty in
recognizing in this word the national name borrowed into Lithuanian
through the German Schotte.
As this is not the place to deal at length with the
history of Scottish influence on the European continent, it will be
sufficient to refer the reader seeking further information on tile subject
to the following works: (1) Fischer, Th Scots in Germany (1902). The Scots
in Eastern and Western Prussia (1903), The Scots in Sweden (1907) ; all
three volumes published in Edinburgh. (2) Steuart, Scottish Influences in
Russian Glasgow. 1913 : Papers relating to the Scots in Poland. Edinburgh.
1915; and numerous essays by the same author in recent volumes of the
Scottish Historical Review. (3) Donner, The Scottish families in Finland
and Sweden, Helsingfors. 1884. (4) Forbes Leith, The Scots Men-at-arms and
Life-guards in France, Edinburgh. 1882. 2 v.
The Scots were not long settled in Ulster before
misfortune and persecu tion began to harass them. The Irish rebellion of
1641, which was in fact an outbreak directed mainly against the Scottish
and English settlers in Ulster, caused them much suffering. The Revolution
of 1688 was also long and bloody in Ireland and the sufferings of the
settlers reached a climax in the siege of Londonderry (April to August,
1689). The Ulster colonists suffered also from the restrictions laid upon
their industries and commerce by the English government. The exportation
of cattle from Ireland to England was prohibited and ships from Ireland
were treated as if belonging to foreigners. In 1698 the manufacture of
woollen goods in Ireland was suppressed, though by the same act
encouragement was given to the manufacture of linen. These and other
events naturally caused great discontent, and with the accession of George
I distress had reached such a head that relief was sought for through
emigration to the American colonies.
About this time, or roughly from 1718 to 1750. was the
first steady stream of eniigration. In consequence of the famine of
1740-41 it is stated that for "several years afterward 12,000 emigrants
annually left Ulster for the American plantations’’ while from 1771 to
1773 ‘‘the whole emigration from Ulster is estimated at 30,000, of whom
10,000 are weavers’’ (Harrison).
Another and an important cause of the early appearance
of Scots in America was the wars between Scotland and England during the
Commonwealth. Large numbers of the unfortunate Scottish prisoners taken at
Dun-bar (1650) and at Worcester in 1651 were sold into service in the
colonies. A shipload of these unfortunates arrived in Boston Harbour 1652
on the ship John and Sara. To their miserable condition on arrival was due
the foundation in 1657 of the Scots Charitable Society of Boston-—the
earliest Scottish society in America. A list of the passengers of the John
and Sara is given in the Suffolk Deed Records, book 1. pp. 5-6. and in
Drake's work on the Founders of New England. These men, says Bolton,
‘‘worked out their terms of servitude at the Lynn iron works and
elsewhere, and founded honour-able families whose Scotch names appear upon
our early records. No account exists of the Scotch prisoners that were
sent to New England in Cromwell’s time; at York in 1650 were the Maxwells,
McIntires and Grants. The Mackclothlans (i.e., MacLachlans); later known
as the Claflins, gave a governor to Massachusetts and distinguished
merchants to New York City" (Bolton, p. 11).
The bitter persecution of Presbyterians in Scotland
during the period of Episcopal rule in the latter half of the seventeenth
century also contributed largely to Scottish emigration to the new world.
A Scottish merchant in Boston named Hugh Campbell obtained permission from
the authorities of the Bay Colony in February, 1679-80 to bring in a
number of settlers from Scotland and to establish them in the Nepmung
county in the vicinity of Springfield, Mass.
In 1706 the Rev. Cotton Mather put forth a plan to
settle hardy families of Scots on the frontiers of Maine and New Hampshire
to protect the towns and particularly the churches there from the French
and Indians. He records: "I write letters unto diverse persons of honour
both in Scotland and in England; to procure Settlements of Good Scotch
Colonies to the Northward of Us:" and in his Memorial of the Present
deplorable State of New England he suggests that a Scots colony might be
of good service in getting possession of Nova Scotia. In 1735,
twenty-seven families, and in 1753 a company of sixty adults and a nuniber
of children, collected by General Samuel Waldo in Scotland, were landed at
George's River, Maine. In honour of the ancient capital of their native
country. they named their settlement Stirling.
Another large emigration from Ulster came in five ships
to Boston, August 4, 1718, under the leadership of Rev. William Boyd,
consisting of about 700 people. They were permitted by Governor Shute to
select a township site of 12 miles square at any place on the frontiers. A
few of these settled at Portland, Me., Wicasset. and Worcester and
Haverhill, Mass., but the greater number finally at Londonderry, N. H. In
1723-24 they built a parsonage and a church for their minister. Rev. James
MacGregor. In six years they had four schools and within nine years
Londonderry paid one-fifteenth of the State tax. Previous to the
Revolution, ten distinct settlements were made by colonists from
Londonderry. N. H., all of which became towns of influence and importance.
Two townships in Vermont, one in Pennsylvania and two in Nova Scotia were
settled from the same source at the same time. Notable among the
descendants of these colonists were Matthew Thornton, Henry Knox, Gen. en.
John Stark, Hugh McCulloch, Horace Greeley, Gen. George B. McClellan,
Charles Foster, Salmon P. Chase, and Asa Gray.
A number of Scottish Colonists from earlier emigrations
to Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New Jersey settled a township (now
Stirling) in Wind-ham County. Conn. From them were descended Gen. Ulysses
S. Grant and Andrew Dickson White, former Ambassador to Germany.
So desperate had matters become in Scotland at the
beginning of the ninth decade of the seventeenth century that a number of
nobles and gentlemen
determined to settle in New Jersey and in the
Carolinas. One of these colonies was founded in New Jersey in 1682 under
the management of James Drummond, Earl of Perth, John Drummond, Robert
Barclay the Quaker, author of the celebrated Apology for the People
called Quakers, David and John Barclay, his brothers, Robert Gordon,
Gawen Lawrie, and George Willocks. In 1684 Gawen Lawrie was appointed
deputy governor of the province, and fixed his residence at Elizabeth. In
the same year Perth (so named in honour of James Drummond, Earl of Perth,
one of the principal proprietors; now Perth Amboy) was made the capital of
the new Scottish settlement. During the following century a constant
stream of emigration both from Scotland and from Ulster came to the
colony. Gawen Lawrie was succeeded as governor of the province by Lord
Neill Campbell, who with a number of others had been exiled from Scotland
for participation in the Earl of Argyll’s uprising in 1685.
One of the prime encouragers of the Scottish
colonization of New Jersey was George Scot of Pitlochrie, a son of the
celebrated Sir John Scot of Scotstarvet, author of the well-known work
bearing the alliterative title The Staggering
State of Scottish
Statesmen. George Scot had been
repeatedly fined and imprisoned by the Privy Council of Scotland for
attending "conventicles," and in the hope of obtaining freedom of worship
in the new world he proposed to emigrate "to the plantations." To
encourage others to do likewise he said "there are several people in this
kingdom (i.e., Scotland) who, upon account of their not going that
length in conformity required of them by the law, do live very uneasy,
who, beside the other agreeable accommodations of that place may there
freely enjoy their own principles without hazard or trouble." In 1685 he
published at Edinburgh a work called The Model of the Government of the
Province of East New Jersey, in America; and Encouragement for such as
design to be concerned there. This work is extremely rare (ten copies
only are known to be in existence), but the work has been reprinted by the
New
Jersey Historical Society (1846) as an appendix to the
first volume of its Collections. In recognition of his services in
writing this book, Scot received from the proprietors of East New Jersey a
grant dated 28th July, 1685, of five hundred acres of land in the
province. A few days later he sailed from Leith with nearly two hundred
others, including his wife and family, and his wife’s cousin, Archibald
Riddell, one of the obnoxious Presbyterian preachers. During the voyage a
malignant fever broke out among the passengers and nearly half on board
perished, including Scot and his wife. A son and daughter survived. The
latter married in 1686 John Johnstone, an Edinburgh druggist, who had been
one of her fellow-passengers on the voyage. To him the proprietors issued
(January 13, 1686-7) a confirmation of the grant made a year before to his
father-in-law, and their descendants occupied a good position in the
colony. Many of their descendants left America as loyalists at the
Revolution, but some of them are still living in New Jersey.
Walter Ker, of Dalserf, Lanarkshire,
banished in 1685, settled in Freehold and was active in organizing the
Presbyterian Church there, one of the oldest in New Jersey. The Scottish
settlers who came over at this period occupied most of the northern
counties of the state and a number went south and southwest, mainly around
Princeton, and, says Samuel Smith, the first historian of the Province,
"There were very soon four towns in the Province, viz., Elizabeth, Newark,
Middletown, and Shrewsbury: and these with the country round were in a few
years plentifully inhabited by the accession of the Scotch, of whom there
came a great many." These Scots, says Douglas Campbell, largely gave
"character to this sturdy little state, not the least of their
achievements being the building up, if not the nominal founding, of
Princeton College, which has contributed so largely to the scholarship of
America’’ (The Puritan, v. 2, p. 484).
In 1682 a company of noblemen and
gentlemen in Scotland entered into bonds with each other for making a
settlement in South Carolina. The royal encouragement and protection was
given to the scheme and the constitution of the colony was altered to
secure to these Scots greater immunity from oppression. The place of
settlement was Port Royal. The colonists consisted mainly of Presbyterians
banished for attending conventicles, as clandestine religious gatherings
were called, and, says Wodrow, for not owing the king’s supremacy,
declining to call the engagement of Bothwell Brig a rebellion, and
refusing to renounce the Covenants. The names of some of these emigrants,
whose descendants exist to the present day, were James McClintock, John
Buchanan, William Inglis, Gavin Black, Adam Allan, John Gait, Thomas
Marshall, William Smith, Robert Urie, Thomas Bryee, John Syme, John
Alexander, John Marshall, Matthew Machen, John Paton, John Gibson, John
Young, Arthur Cunningham, George Smith, and George Dowart. The colony was
further increased by the small remnant of the ill-fated expedition to
Darien. Of the seven vessels which left the Isthmus to return to Scotland
only two reached home in safety. One, the largest ship of all, called the
Rising Sun, made the coast of Florida under a fierce gale. They
succeeded in making their way from there to Charleston, under a jury mast.
Here the Rev. Archibald Stobo was waited upon by a deputation from the
Church in Charleston and invited to preach in the town while the ship
should be refitted. He accepted the invitation and left the ship with his
wife and about a dozen others, and went ashore. The following day, the
Rising Sun, while lying off the bar, was overwhelmed in a hurricane
and all on board, believed to have numbered one hundred and twelve, were
drowned. One of the most noted of the descendants of Rev. Archibald Stobo
is Hon. Theodore Roosevelt.
In the following year (1683) the
colony was augmented by a number of Scottish colonists from Ulster under
the leadership of one Ferguson, but little is known of them. A second
colony in the same year, conducted by Henry Erskine, Lord Cardross, who
had suffered much persecution in Scotland for his religious opinions,
founded Stuartstown (so named in honour of his wife). Another large
Scottish settlement from Ulster was that of Williamsburgh township
(1732-1734), who named their principal village Kingstree.
There were settlements of Scottish
Highlanders in North Carolina, on the Cape Fear River, as early as 1729;
some are said to have located there as early as 1715. Neill MacNeill of
Jura brought over a colony of more than 350 from Argyllshire in 1739, and
large numbers in 1746, after Culloden, and settled them on the Cape Fear.
Cross Creek, now Fayetteville, was the center of these Highland
settlements. The mania for emigration to North Carolina affected all
classes and continued for many years. The Scots Magazine for
September, 1769, records that the ship Molly sailed from Islay on
August 21, full of passengers for North Carolina, which was the third
emigration from Argyll "since the close of the late war." A subsequent
issue states that fifty-four vessels full of emigrants from the Western
Islands and other parts of the Highlands sailed for North Carolina between
April and July, 1770, conveying 1,200 emigrants. Early in 1771, the same
magazine states that 500 emigrants in Islay and adjoining isles were
preparing to sail for America. Again it records that the ship Adventure
sailed from Loch Erribol, Sunday, August 17, 1772, with upwards of 200
emigrants from Sutherlandshire for North Carolina. In 1772 the great
Macdonald emigration began and continued until the breaking out of the war
in America. In 1753, it was estimated that there were 1,000 Scotsmen in
the single county of Cumberland capable of bearing arms, of whom the
Macdonalds were the most numerous. Gabriel Johnston, governor of the
province from 1734 till his death in 1752, bears the reputation of having
done more to promote the settlement and prosperity of North Carolina than
all its other colonial governors combined. Being very partial to the
people of his native country, he sought to better their condition by
inducing them to emigrate to North Carolina. Among the charges brought
against him in 1748 was that of his inordinate fondness for Scotchmen
(Hanna, v. 2, p. 37).
The heroine, Flora Macdonald, and
her husband, Allan Macdonald, Laird of Kingsburgh, set sail from
Campbeltown, Scotland, on the ship Balliol, in August, 1774, bound
for North Carolina. They landed at Wilmington and proceeded to Cross Creek
(Fayetteville), in both settlements receiving a most enthusiastic
reception. Their first home was at Cameron’s Hill (then Mt. Pleasant), but
they removed later to the west, into Anson County, to an estate which they
named "Killiegrey." Flora and Allan Macdonald inscribed their names in the
roll of the old Barbaque Kirk, near Cross Creek. This was one of two
churches founded in 1758 by Rev. James Campbell, a native of Campbeltown,
Argyllshire, and at that time was under the ministry of the Rev. John
MacLeod.
Many of these Cape Fear Scotsmen,
unlike the Scottish settlers of South Carolina and Virginia, remained
loyalists during the American Revolution. They were led, through their
interpretation of their oath to Governor Martin and their loyalty to Flora
Macdonald, to join in the misguided uprising which resulted so fatally at
the battle of Moore’s Creek Bridge, February 27, 1776, where all were
killed or captured. Of more than 700 prisoners, the private soldiers were
released on parole, the officers, including Allan Macdonald,
afterward were exchanged as prisoners and sent to Halifax. After the war
several of these settled in the Maritime Provinces. Flora Macdonald
returned to Scotland in 1779, where her husband, Allan, joined her in
1783.
There were also large settlements of
Ulster Scots in North Carolina, 1740-1760. Notable among these were the
communities in Orange, Rowan and Mecklenburg Counties. From the latter
came the famous Mecklenburg Resolutions, adopted in Charlotte, N. C., May
31, 1775, more than a year before the Declaration of Independence, which
Bancroft characterizes as the first voice raised for American
Independence. The Mecklenburg Assembly, which
met on May 20, 1775, was composed of
"twenty-seven stanch Calvinists, of whom nine were Presbyterian ruling
elders and one a Presbyterian minister" (E. W. Smith, p. 144).
Some Scottish Presbyterians
were also settled near Norfolk, Virginia, on the Eastern branch of the
Elizabeth River, before 1680. In Maryland there seems to have been a
colony about 1670 under Colonel Ninian Beall, settled between the Potomac
and the Patuxent. At intervals during the next twenty years he induced
many of his friends in Scotland (estimated at about two hundred) to join
him. Through his influence a church existed at Patuxent in 1704, the
members of which included several prominent Fifeshire families. Many other
Scottish colonists were settled on the eastern shore of Maryland and
Virginia, particularly in Accomac, Dorchester, Somerset, Wicomico and
Worcester Counties. To minister to them the Rev. Francis Makemie of
Ramelton, was sent by the Presbytery of Lagan in the North of Ireland at
the invitation of Col. William Stevens. Three of these churches, founded
by him in 1683, at Snow Hill, Pitts Creek and Rehoboth, Maryland, were the
charge of Rev Samuel MacMaster, who came from Scotland or the North of
Ireland, for thirty-seven years (1774-1811), during the Revolutionary War
period. They are the oldest organized Presbyterian churches in America.
Another prominent minister of the time, a friend of Makemie, was the Rev.
William Traill, a graduate of Glasgow University. He had suffered
imprisonment for his opinions at home, and upon his release came to
Maryland in 1682. Upper Marlborough, Maryland, was founded by a company of
Scottish emigrants under the pastorate of the Rev. Nathaniel Taylor about
1690.
Two shiploads of Scottish
Jacobites taken at Preston in Lancashire were sent over in the summer of
1717 in the ships Friendship and Good Speed to Maryland and
sold as servants. The names of some of these "Rebels" were Dugall
Macqueen, Alexander Garden, Henry Wilson, John Sinclair, William Grant.,
Thomas Spark, Alexander Spalding, James Webster, John Robertson, William
MacBean, William MacGilvary, James Hindry, Allin Maclien, William Cumins,
William Davidson, Hector Macqueen, David Steward, Thomas Donolson, James
Mitchell, Thomas McNabb, James Shaw, John Maclntire, Alexander Macdugall,
Finley Cameron, James Renton, James Rutherford, Daniel Grant, Finloe
Maclntire, Daniel Kennedy, William Ferguson, Laughlin MacIntosh, John
Cameron, Alexander Orrach, William Macferson, etc. (Scharf, History of
Maryland, v. 1, pp. 385-387). In 1747 another shipload of Jacobites
taken in the Rebellion of ‘45 were sent over to Maryland in the ship
Johnson of Liverpool, and arrived at the port of Oxford July 20, 1747.
Their names are recorded on a worm-eaten, certified list preserved among
the records of Annapolis. Among those named are: John Grant, James Allen,
Alexander Buchanan, Thomas Claperton, Charles Davidson, Thomas Ross, John
Gray, Patrick Murray, William Melvil, William Murdock, James Mill, Peter
Duddoch, Naile (? Neill)
Robertson, John Macnabb, Hugh Maclean, Roderick Macferrist, Sanders
Walker, Gilbert Maccallum, John Arbuthnot, etc. (Seharf, v. 1, p 435).
In 1734, Robert Harper, an Ulster
Scot, came to the junction of the Potomac and Shenandoah rivers and
established the ferry which gave its name to the settlement.
In 1735 the General Assembly of
South Carolina, with a view to the strengthening of the colony,
commissioned Lieutenant Hugh Mackay to recruit among the Highlands of
Scotland. So successful was he that one hundred and thirty Highianders
with fifty women and children were in a short time enrolled at Inverness.
These individuals, together with several grantees going at their own
charge and taking servants with them, sailed October 18, 1735, and landed
in the Savannah River in January following. "These men," says Jones, "were
not reckless adventurers or reduced emigrants volunteering through
necessity, or exiled by insolvency or want. They were men of good
character, and were carefully selected for their military qualities. . . .
Besides this military band, others among the Mackays, the Dunbars, the
Bailies, and the Cuthberts applied for large tracts of land in Georgia,
which they occupied with their own servants. Many of them went over in
person and settled in the province" (History of Georgia, v. 1, p.
200; Boston, 1883). Shortly after their arrival they ascended the
Alatamaha River for some distance and there founded a permanent settlement
which they named New Inverness. To the district which they were to hold
and cultivate they gave the name of Darien. Both these places are in
McIntosh county. Efficient military service was rendered by these
Highlanders during the wars between the colonists and the Spaniards and by
their descendants in the American Revolution. "To John Moore McIntosh,
Captaill Hugh Mackay, Ensign Charles Mackay, Colonel John McIntosh,
General Lachlan McIntosh, and their gallant comrades and followers,
Georgia, both as a colony and a state, owes a large debt of gratitude.
This settlement was subsequently augmented from time to time by fresh
arrivals from Scotland. Although located in a malarial region, it
maintained its integrity and increased in wealth and influence. Its men
were prompt and efficient in arms, and when the war cloud descended upon
the southern confines of the province no defenders were more alert or
capable than those found in the ranks of these Highlanders" (Jones, v. 1,
p. 201). With the first colony, the Society in Scotland for Propagating
Christian Knowledge sent out the Rev. John Macleod of Skye to preach to
the people in Gaelic. It would be interesting to know how long the
knowledge of Gaelic existed among the colonists in Georgia. Rupp, the
historian of the counties of Berks and Lebanon in Pennsylvania (1844, p.
115), says the language had disappeared from there before his day.
A strong infusion of Scottish blood
in New York state came through settlements made there in response to a
proclamation issued in 1735 by the Governor, inviting "loyal Protestant
Highlanders" to settle the lands between the Hudson and the northern
lakes. Attracted by this offer, Captain Lauchlin Campbell, of Islay, in
1738-40 brought over eighty-three families of Highlanders to settle on a
grant of nearly 30,000 acres in what is now Washington County on the
borders of Lake George (Smith, History of New York, p. 197;
Phila., 1792). His expectations in regard to land grants were
disappointed, and to add to his troubles many of the families he had
brought over refused to settle on his lands. Notwithstanding the hardships
incidental to pioneer life, these emigrants on the whole succeeded fairly
well. "By this immigration," says E. H. Roberts, "the province secured a
much needed addition to its population, and these Highlanders must have
sent messages home not altogether unfavorable, for they were the pioneers
of a multitude whose coming in successive years was to add strength and
thrift and intelligence beyond the ratio of their numbers to the
communities in which they set up their homes"
(New York, v.
1, p. 286; Boston, 1904).
Many Scottish emigrants settled in
the vicinity of Goshen, Orange County, in 1720, and by 1729 had organized
and built two churches. A second colony arrived from the North of Ireland
in 1731, which included Charles Clinton and his sister, Christiana Clinton
Beatty, the former the father and grandfather of two Revolutionary
generals and two governors of New York; the latter the mother of two noted
Presbyterian divines, both named for her brother, Charles Clinton.
At the same time as the grant to
Lauchlin Campbell, on Lake Champlain, in 1738 Lieutenant-Governor Clarke
granted to John Lindesay, a Scottish gentleman, and three associates, a
tract of eight thousand acres at Cherry Valley, in Otsego County. Lindesay
afterward purchased the rights of his associates and sent out families
from Scotland and Ulster to the valley of the Susquehanna. These were
augmented by pioneers from Londonderry, N. H., under the Rev. Samuel
Dunlop, who in 1743 established in his own house the first classical
school west of the Hudson. October 11, 1778, the entire settlement was
destroyed and thirty-two inhabitants, chiefly women and children, and
sixteen soldiers killed, and the others carried off by the Royalists and
Indians under Walter Butler and Joseph Brant.
Ballston in Saratoga County was
settled in 1770 by a colony of Presbyterians, who removed from Bedford, N.
Y., with their pastor, Rev. Eliphalet Ball, and were afterward joined by
many Scottish emigrants from Scotland, Ulster, New Jersey and New England.
The first Presbyterian church was organized in Albany in 1760 by Scottish
emigrants who had settled in that vicinity.
Sir William Johnson, for his
services in the French war, 1755-1758, and in the settlement and defence
of northern New York, was given a grant of 100,000 acres of land in the
Mohawk Valley, in the neighborhood of Johnstown, N. Y., and brought over
in 1773-1774 many families from the Scottish Highlands, Glengarry,
Glenmorison, Urquhart and Strathglass, Inverness-. shire. Prominent among
these were the Macdonells of Glengarry. Sir John Johnson succeeded his
father at his death, July 11, 1774. When the Revolutionary War broke out
he led them in a Loyalist movement, which eventually removed almost the
entire colony into Ontario.
John More and his wife, Betty Taylor
More, natives of Rothiemurchus, Inverness-shire, Scotland, settled in the
western Catskills on the site of the present village of Roxbury, New York,
in 1773. Roxbury, the birthplace of Jay Gould and John Burroughs, the
naturalist, was founded in 1788, when Abraham Gould and other settlers
from Connecticut joined More in that region. September 3 and 4, 1915, the
twenty-fifth anniversary of the John More Association in the United
States, was celebrated by a historical pageant on the grounds of Mrs.
Finley J. Shepard, who was Miss Helen Gould, a direct descendant of John
More. Her grandfather, John Burr Gould, having married Mary More in 1827.
Rev. Francis Makemie preached to the
Presbyterians in New York City in January, 1707, for which he was arrested
and imprisoned. The First Presbyterian Church, "The Old First," Rev.
Howard Duffield, D.D., pastor, now at Fifth Avenue, 11th to 12th streets,
was founded in December, 1716, and December 3-10, 1916, celebrated its
200th anniversary. The Second Presbyterian Church, the "Scotch
Presybyterian Church," Rev. Robert Watson, D.D., pastor, organized in
1756, the same year as the St. Andrew’s Society of the State of New York,
celebrated its 160th anniversary October 29 to November 5, 1916. The city
now has sixty Presbyterian churches and 189 ministers connected with New
York Presbytery.
Mention must also be made of the
colony of several hundred Scottish weavers who settled more than a century
ago in New York City, and there diligently plied their handicraft. They
formed a community apart from the rest of the citizens, and are said to
have won and maintained a good reputation as an industrious, useful, and.
orderly people. The place where they resided in the city was in what was
at that time the village of Greenwich, in a nook by the side of a country
lane called Southampton Road, to which in memory of their home in the old
country they gave the name of "Paisley Place." A view of some of their old
houses in Seventeenth Street, between Sixth Avenue and Seventh Avenue, as
they existed in 1863, is given in Valentine’s Manual for that year.
Although many Scots came to New
England and New York they never settled there in such numbers as to leave
their impress on the community so deeply as they did in New Jersey,
Pennsylvania and the South. There were Presbyterian churches in Lewes,
Newcastle (Delaware), and Philadelphia previous to 1698, and from that
time forward the province of Pennsylvania was the chief center of Scottish
settlement, both from Scotland and by way of Ulster. By 1720 these
settlers had reached the mouth of the Susquehanna, and three years later
the present site of Harrisburg. Between 1730 and 1745 they settled the
Cumberland Valley, and still pushing westward in 1768-69 the present
Fayette, Westmoreland, Allegheny and Washington counties. By 1779 they had
crossed the Ohio River into the present State of Ohio. Between the years
1730 to 1775, the Scottish emigration into Pennsylvania often exceeded ten
thousand in a single year. In 1736, it is recorded, there were one
thousand families waiting in Belfast for ships to bring them to America.
Rev. John Cuthbertson, a
Presbyterian missionary for nearly forty years (1751-1790), travelled
through these primitive settlements establishing churches and visiting
families. He rode on horseback more than 60,000 miles, preached 2,400
days, baptized 1,600 to 1,800 children and married nearly 250 couples, and
founded fifteen churches. Rev. Charles Clinton Beatty, a graduate of
Tennent's "Log College" at Neshaminy, was the first Presbyterian
missionary to cross the Allegheny Mountains, with General Forbes in 1758.
He and Rev. George Duffield visited western Pennsylvania again in the
summer and fall of 1766. Both Cuthbertson and Beatty left Journals
which throw interesting light upon the contemporary life of these hardy
pioneers.
While the majority of the settlers
came by way of Ulster, and while there were large settlements of Germans
and Welsh throughout Pennsylvania (the Quaker settlements did not extend
far beyond Philadelphia), an outstanding feature of these Journals,
and those of other missionaries laboring in the same field, is that almost
every family name mentioned in them is pure Scotch—Walkers, Rosses,
Browns, Buchanans, Mitchells, McClellands, Dinwiddies, Flemings,
McKnaughts, MePhersons, Pattersons, Ormsbys, Elliotts, Kings, Keiths,
McCartneys, Hunters, Maclays, Murrays, McCandlish, Campbells, McDowells,
McKays, Douglases, McCurdys and countless others. The preaching was often
in the rude cabins of the settlers but more often, as Duffield writes, "in
the woods, as we have done mostly hitherto." at places designed for
building houses of worship,—" ‘ There is no house. I must preach among the
trees." "I preached from a wagon, the only one present." Great difficulty
was experienced in assembling the congregation, who often came for miles
through the wilderness for the first preaching they had heard in years.
Rev. James Finley in 1767, the Rev. Daniel McClure in 1772, the Rev. James
Power in 1772 and in 1774, and the Rev. John McMillan in 1775 and again in
1776 visited the Pennsylvania settlements, which before the beginning of
the Revolutionary War had laid the foundations of some of the most
prosperous towns and cities in the Keystone State.
From the coast settlements the
stream of immigration flowed south into the Virginias, the Carolinas,
Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee, and west across the Alleghenies into the
great territory of Ohio. It is a matter of historical record that the
majority of the hardy pioneers and settlers of the great Middle West were
of Scottish birth or descent, and to this day the illiterate mother among
the Kentucky mountaineers passes on her burden of tradition when she tells
her unruly boy: " ‘Behave yourself, or Clavers will get you!’ To her
Clavers is but a bogey; but to her ancestors Graham of Claverhouse was a
very real cause of terror." (Bolton, p. 300.)
The passion for freedom among the
Scots was developed by the centuries of bitter warfare waged against the
aggression of their richer and more powerful southern neighbour—a warfare
it may be said continued in a modified form to the present day. The Scots’
determination to maintain their freedom and independence early found
literary expression in the Letter of Remonstrance addressed to the Pope by
the Barons of Scotland in 1320, a document which has been well described
as "the noblest burst of patriotic feeling, the finest declaration of
independence that real history has to show." Addressing the Holy Father in
most vigorous and stirring language the Barons declared: "For so long as a
hundred remain alive, we never will in any degree be subject to the
dominion of the English. Since not for glory, riches or honours we fight,
but for liberty alone, which no good man loses but with his life." George
Buchanan’s De Jure Regni apud Scotos ("The Jurisdiction of the Law
over the Scots"), published in 1759, exercised a profound influence on
Scottish opinion, and in the seventeenth century the work became
"aVade Mecum
to those who in Scotland and England were
engaged in the struggle for political rights against the Stewart kings."
The thesis of Buchanan’s work is that the king is inferior to the law, and
that he is responsible to the people: "We contend," he says, "that the
people, from whence our kings derive whatever power they claim, is
paramount to our kings; and that the commonalty has the same jurisdiction
over them which they have over any individual of the commonalty. The
usages of all nations that live under legal kings are in our favour; and
all states that obey kings of their own election in common adopt the
opinion that whatever right the people may have granted to an individual,
it may, for just reason, also re-demand. For this is an inalienable
privilege that all communities must have always maintained."
At the beginning of the
Revolutionary War there were nearly seventy communities of Scots and
Ulster-Scots in New England, including Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont,.
Massachusetts and Connecticut; from thirty to forty in New York; fifty to
sixty in New Jersey; more than 130 in Pennsylvania and Delaware; more than
one-hundred in Virginia, Maryland and Eastern Tennessee; fifty in North
Carolina; about seventy in South Carolina and Georgia; in all about 500
settlements (exclusive of the English Presbyterian congregations in New
York and New Jersey), scattered throughout all the American colonies.
(Hanna, v. II. p. 2.) Bancroft estimates the total white population of the
colonies in 1775 to have been 2,100,000 (by 1790, the date of the
first national census, this had increased to 3,172,000) ; of these Hanna
figures that those of Scottish ancestry were distributed as follows: New
England, 25,000; New York, 25,000; New Jersey, 25,000; Pennsylvania,
100,000; Delaware, 10,000; Maryland, 30,000; Virginia, 75,000; North
Carolina, 65,000; South Carolina, 45,000; Georgia, 10,000; in all,
4l0,000—about one-fifth of the white population. Others estimate that the
white population at the time of the Revolution was 3,000,000, and that of
this number 900,000 were of Scotch or Scotch-Irish origin, 600,000 were
English, 400,000 were Dutch, German and Huguenot descent.—W. H. Roberts,
Seventh General Assembly Council, 1899, p. 94.
In their new homes on this side of
the Atlantic, to which they had come for greater freedom and liberty of
conscience, it was not to be expected that a people who held such doctrine
would tamely submit to kingly oppression. Hence it was that among the
Scots and their descendants were found so many of the leaders in the
struggle for American independence. Their leadership in the causes which
led to the War of Independence has been well put by Bancroft in the
following words: "The first voice publicly raised in America to dissolve
all connection with Great Britain (the Mecklenburg and West-moreland
Resolutions) came not from the Puritans of New England, nor the Dutch of
New York, nor the Planters of Virginia, but from the Ulster Scottish
Presbyterians" (History of the United States, v. 5, p. 77, Boston,
1861). And when the war finally came, it was they who bore the brunt of
the fighting from the Hudson to Savannah. Joseph Galloway, than whom, says
Ford, "there could be no better informed witness," "held that the
underlying cause of the American Revolution was the (organized) activity
and influence of the Presbyterian interest," and that "it was the
Presbyterians who supplied the Colonial resistance a lining without which
it would have collapsed." In his evidence before a Committee of the House
of Commons in 1799, he declared that at the beginning not one-quarter of
the people "had independence in view," and that in the army enlisted by
the Continental Congress "there were scarcely one-fourth natives of
America—about one-half Irish (that is, Ulster Scots), the other fourth
were English and Scotch." The Hon. Richard Wright, at one time speaker of
the House of Representatives of Pennsylvania, an Episcopalian, said "The
War of Independence was a Presbyterian and it has girded on the sword it
has put the Bible in the knapsack. It is Scotch-Irish
war" (Scotch-Irish in America. Proceedings,
v. 3, p. 135). So prominent, indeed, was the part taken
by Presbyterians as individuals and as a church in the Revolutionary
struggle that at its close rumors were rife that projects were on foot to
make Presbyterianism the religion of the Republic (Breed, p. 56). The
influence of Scotland and Presbyterianism on the formation of the Republic
is further shown by the remark of Chief Justice Tilghman (1756-1827), who
stated that the framers of the Constitution of the United States were,
through the agency of Dr. Witherspoon, much indebted to the standards of
the Presbyterian Church of Scotland, in modelling that admirable
instrument under which we have enjoyed our liberty (Parker, p. 103).
It is a hardy race, the Scots. "It
believed in prayer and it believed in work. It had faith and it could
fight. It came to these shores, and we find it in New Hampshire, in
Pennsylvania, in Virginia, and in the Carolinas. It was at Cape Breton,
and at Quebec. It was in the Continental Congress, and in the Continental
Army. It was in the infant navy and in the adult navy. It sailed with
Preble and it fought with Decatur. It was with Farragut at Mobile, and
roved with Semmes on strange seas. It gained the victory at King’s
Mountain and saw the surrender at Yorktown. It helped to make the
constitution and did more than its share in winning the west. It was with
Stonewall Jackson at Chancellorsville, and with George H. Thomas at
Chiekamaugua. It triumphed with Grant and surrendered with Lee. It
believes in the family and in the home, in the church and in the school,
and where presbtyerian, and representative government in church and in
state is part of its religion. It is for the Sabbath that God ordained. It
is mighty nearly the elected crown of American citizenship—yet vaunteth
not itself." May its record in the future be as honourable and meritorious
as it has been in the past!
A few
years ago Mr. Jenkinson, United States consul in Glasgow, said: "If the
Americans lived in liberty and independence, it was mainly through what
the Scots had taught them. If they tried to elevate mankind morally and
socially by a thorough system of popular education, they but followed the
example of Scotland. If they refused to put on and wear the shackles which
bound the consciences of men and prevented a full and free religious
worship, they but accepted the results of the long and severe contest
waged by the people of Scotland."
"Let anyone scrutinize the list of
names of distinguished men in our annals; names of men eminent in public
life from Presidents down; men distinguished in the Church, in the Army,
in the Navy, at the Bar, on the Bench, in Medicine and Surgery, in
Education, trade, commerce, invention, discovery—in any and all the arts
which add to the freedom, enlightenment, and wealth of the world, and to
the convenience and comfort of mankind; names which have won lustre in
every honourable calling—let him scrutinize the list and see for himself
how large a proportion of these names represent men who have this blood in
their veins" (Dinsmore, p. 5). The proportion of men of this race who, the
world over, have reached high distinction, is phenomenal. Nowhere has the
influence of this people had greater scope than in the United States and
in the British Colonies. In this country their impress is
everywhere on the industries, the commerce, the inventions, the
educational, philanthropie, charitable, and religious institutions of the
country. In these pages it is obviously impossible to mention every Scot
who has achieved distinction—to do so would require a large biographical
dictionary. We can only here select a few prominent from the earliest to
the present day. |