This is a review I found in
The Scottish Review and thought I'd include it here for you to read.
This is a story of a major Scottish publishing and the authors they
dealt with.
This review is of the two volume publication but a third volume was
added later and I have made them available in pdf format at the foot of
this article should you wish to read them.
THE history of a great
publishing house is practically a part of the history of literature. The
two bulky volumes before us, therefore, though containing only a part of
the history of the publishing house of Messrs. William Blackwood & Sons,
have not only a commercial and a biographical interest, they have also a
measure of that larger and more permanent interest which belongs to
literature as the reflection of the thoughts, sentiments, and opinions
of the human mind which constitutes its chief value for the history of a
nation or of the race. In this latter respect these two volumes are
specially important. Almost from the first the history of the house
whose transactions they record, has been bound up with the history of a
great and popular Magazine which during a long series of years has been
conducted with remarkable success, and has had for its contributors some
of the most brilliant writers of the period, who, while seeking in its
pages to gratify the tastes of its numerous readers, have done much to
shape their opinions. As indices to the thoughts and sentiments of a
nation there is perhaps none surer than that which is afforded by the
magazines it reads. With few exceptions, they are first, if not chiefly,
commercial undertakings ; they may aim at a high standard of literary
excellence; but their success and their existence are measured precisely
by the extent to which they meet and satisfy the tastes and literary
requirements of the public for which they cater; and perhaps there is no
surer guide to the literary history of the English speaking race during
the greater part of the present century than the pages of Maga when read
in the light thrown upon them by the two volumes to which we are now
referring.
There is another and
pathetic interest attaching to these volumes. They were begun with
enthusiasm and in hope, but unfortunately the accomplished authoress,
who for so long a time occupied an honoured and conspicuous place in
English letters and for forty years had worked incessantly for the
Magazine whose story she was recording, was not permitted to complete
the work she had in hand, or even to put the necessary finishing touches
to what she had written. While still in the act of revising, and before
the revision could be carried beyond the first volume, death arrested
her hand and closed a 'long and strenuous literary life' to which there
have been few equals. From the first she seems to have been drawn
towards the Blackwoods by feelings of affectionate regard, and there are
few passages more touching or beautiful than the one in which she
records her interview with the heads of the firm when her own fortunes
had reached a crisis. It is one of the last she wrote, and goes back to
the winter of 1860, when she had just buried her husband in Italy and
temporarily settled in Edinburgh with her little family of three
fatherless children.' 'I was poor,' she says, 'having only my own
exertions to depend on, though always possessing an absolute-foolish
courage (so long as the children were well, my one formula) in life and
providence. But I had not been doing well.' The contributions to the
magazine which she had kept on sending from Italy were not always
inserted. They had been, ' as I can see through the revelations of the
Blackwood letters, pushed about from pillar to post, these kind-hearted
men not willing to reject what they knew to be so important to me, yet
caring but little for them, using them when there happened to be a
scarcity of material, and after my return things were little better.'
And then, after remarking ' several of my articles were rejected and
affairs began to look very dark for me,' she continues—
'Why I should have formed
the idea that in these circumstances, when there was every appearance
that my literary gift, such as it was, was failing me, they would be
likely to entertain a proposal from me for a serial story, I can now
scarcely tell ; but I was rash and in need. At the time I was living in
Fettes Row, in a little house consisting of the ground-floor and the
basement below, a rather forlorn locality, but commanding a wide
prospect — only, it is true, of houses and waste land, but also of a
great deal of sky and air, always particularly agreeable to me. I walked
up to George Street, up the steep hill, with my heart beating, not
knowing (though I might very well have divined) what they would say to
me. There was, indeed, only one thing they could say. They shook their
heads : they were very kind, very unwilling to hurt the feelings of the
poor young woman, with the heavy widow's veil hanging about her like a
cloud. No ; they did not think it was possible. I remember very well how
they stood against the light, the Major tall and straight, John
Blackwood with his shoulders hunched up in his more careless bearing,
embarrassed and troubled by what they saw and no doubt guessed in my
face, while on ray part every faculty was absorbed in the desperate
pride of a woman not to let them see me cry, to keep in until I could
get out of their sight. I remember, also, the walk down the hill, and a
horrible organ that played " Charlie is my darling," and how one line of
the song came into my mind, 'The wind was at his back." The wind, alas !
was not at my back, I reflected, but strong in my face, both really and
metaphorically, the keen north-east that hurries up these slopes as if
it would blow every fragile thing away.
'I went home to find my
little ones all gay and sweet, and was occupied by them for the rest of
the day in a sort of cheerful despair—distraught, yet as able to play as
ever (which they say is a part of a woman's natural duplicity and
dissimulation). But when they had all gone to bed, and the house was
quiet, I sat down—and I don't know when, or if at all, I went to bed
that night; but next day (I think) I had finished and sent up to the
dread tribunal in George Street a short story, which was the beginning
of a series of stories called the Chronicles of Carlingford.'
These stories, she adds,
' set me up at once, and established my footing in the world.' To the
present generation of readers they are probably not so well known as
they deserve to be. They may not in all points be equal to George
Eliot's Scenes of a Clerical Life; but they have excellences of their
own, aud in their own way are unsurpassed. The present writer very well
remembers the sensation their first appearance created and the eagerness
with which succeeding numbers were looked for. They did indeed '
establish' her ' footing in the world,' a footing which she never lost,
and began a career to which the Annals of the Publishing House, to whose
chiefs she owed so much and was so gratefully attached, would, had she
been permitted to finish them, have formed, as she herself felt, a
fitting completion, while, as they stand, with all the melancholy
interest attaching to a posthumous work about them, they show that up to
the last her hand had not lost its cunning nor her heart its fervour.
William Blackwood, the
founder of the firm of William Blackwood & Sons, a shrewd man of
business, a genial friend, a good letter writer, intensely interested in
whatever he took in hand, proud of ' ma Maga,' Ebony, as both he and his
Magazine were frequently and indifferently called, was the son of an
Edinburgh burgess, and was born on the 26th November, 1776. In 1790 he
was apprenticed to Messrs. Bell & Bradfute, a firm of Booksellers in
Parliament Square, Edinburgh, beside the Law Courts, where he had
frequent opportunities of coming in contact with the judges and
advocates and with the professors of the College in the immediate
neighbourhood, who seem to have been in the habit of dropping into the
shop to turn over the new books and to discuss them. He made no heroic
attempts at self-culture by attending classes in the University during
his apprenticeship, but gave his attention wholly to business. Constable
was then at the head of ' the Trade ' in Edinburgh, and combined with
his publishing business that of a dealer in books old and new.
Bibliomania was then in the air, and young Blackwood was soon smitten
with it. Messrs. Bell & Bradfute's was a favourable place for its
development, and by keeping his eyes and wits about him, noting what was
said and done by the more important customers, over which volumes the
great men of the College pored, and which the general public in their
lighter examination tossed aside, he soon learned to know what was
really curious and valuable, and to make that astute distinction between
what is likely to be popular and what is not—a rare and invaluable gift,
which in after life formed one of his chief characteristics, and has
descended to his sons—a gift that does not, as Mrs. Oliphant observes, '
depend on mere literary perception and taste, for sometimes the public
will prefer the best and sometimes the worst, and very frequently,
indeed, picks up something between the two, by some fantastic rule of
selection which lever has been fathomed by any man but a heaven-born
publisher.'
At the conclusion of his
apprenticeship, young Blackwood was sent to Glasgow to act as the agent
of Messrs. Mundell & Co., an Edinburgh publishing firm which is now
forgotten, though its failure, in after years, created almost a panic in
' the Trade,' and brought down with it several smaller houses.
Incidentally we learn that Messrs. Mundell & Co. were the publishers of
Campbell's Pleasures of Hope, and that the price Campbell received for
it was fifty copies of the printed work ! While in Glasgow, young
Blackwood is supposed to have attended classes in the University, which
he may have done, since'the premises of Messrs. Mundell & Co. were
within the precincts of the Old College ; but whether he did or not,
while attending to the business of his agency, he seems to have been
doing a little on his own account. In the first of his known letters—a
letter addressed to Mr. Constable—he assures his correspondent that it
is not a trouble, but a pleasure, ' to pick up books,' and sends him a
list of some he has managed ' to pick up.' They are all more or less
curious, and, with some exceptions, are priced. Among them is Sir David
Lyndesay's Ane Dialog betioix Experience and ane Coarteour, Imprentet at
the Command and Expensis of Dr. Machabeus in Copenhagen, of which he
says, ' It is a small quarto black-letter. It is certainly a great
curiosity, and though I was not sure of its value, 1 paid pretty high
for it.' The last in his list is Gildae de Excidio et Conquesta
Britanniae, etc., Epistola, 18mo, J. Daius, Loud. 1568, to which he adds
the note : 'This, I believe, is a scarce little book, but I cannot see
it in any catalogue, so I leave the price to yourself.' Constable was
still buying and selling libraries, and undertaking their arrangement
and regulation, when he began the publication of the Waverley Novels.
After a year's stay in
Glasgow, young Blackwood returned to Edinburgh. At first he went back to
his old employers, but was soon in partnership with a certain Robert
Ross, ' a bookseller and bookseller's auctioneer' — a description, as
Mrs. Oliphant observes, which explains some of the early catalogues he
put forth. This partnership lasted only a year, at the end of which he
went up to London and joined the establishment of Mr. Cuthill, who was
famous for his catalogues, and remained there three years, probably
assisting Cuthill in the compilation of his catalogues, and doubtless
extending his own knowledge. Probably, as Mrs. Oliphant remarks, ' he
had dreams already of publishing, of finding some man of great genius to
attach himself to, and of making the welkin ring with the name of
Blackwood, then so humble and so little known.' If he had, we suppose he
was not unlike other aspirants in the publishing business, whether
ancient or modern.
In 1604 he returned to
Edinburgh for good, and started business on his own account on the South
Bridge, a situation which, being not far from either the College or
Parliament House, was not badly chosen. He both bought and sold books,
and undertook commissions to arrange and classify and value gentlemen's
libraries. Constable, as we have seen, was doing the same, and had been
for many years. Apparently it was regarded as one of the shortest cuts
to fortune. The book-hunter was then abroad both in Scotland and in
England, ' often,' as Mrs. Oliphant phrases it, ' in the most unlikely
places, hungry for his prey.' Heber was prowling about Edinburgh in any
place that promised discovery of a forgotten volume, and Dibdin in
England was busy with his work on the purchase of old books and their
value and classification.'
On his marriage in 1805
to Miss Janet Steuart, the daughter of Mr. Steuart of Carfin in
Lanarkshire, Mr. Blackwood set up house in one of the streets on the
South-side of Edinburgh, but within a year removed to a house of his
own, ' in one of the leafy roads of Newington, with a wide view from the
windows over the surrounding country, a pleasant garden, and those large
rooms and airy passages which are the charm of Edinburgh houses.' Here
his children were born. The pleasantness of the home over which he here
presided is proved, Mrs. Oliphant remarks, ' with a very tender pathos
by the many pilgrimages made to it still (1895) by the last survivor,
Miss Isabella Blackwood, to whom the image of "my Father" still seems to
smile benignant over the mists of eighty years.'
As for business in these
early years, it was quiet. Book-hunters and others, and among them no
less an individual than Sir Walter, began to gather around the young
bookseller in increasing numbers; but there was no great rush of
success. Still there was steady progress and hopeful prospects. Rivals
there were in plenty, all of whom were 'somewhat rash in the rush of new
energy which had revolutionised " the Trade,' bold in their ventures,
and entertaining a faith in literature which has been much subdued since
then.'
'In those days there was
a certain spirit of daring and romance in "the Trade." The Revival of
Literature was like the opening of a new mine ; it was more than that, a
sort of manufactory out of nothing, to which there seemed no limit. You
had but to set a man of genius spinning at that shining thread which
came from nowhere, which required no purchase of materials or "plant "
of machinery, and your fortune was made. We remember that, later,
Constable went gravely to the Bank of England to negotiate a loan upon
the sole security of the unwritten books to be drawn from the brain of
the author of "Waverley." This confidence had seemed justified by long
experience, and it was the very breath of the eager booksellers, on
tiptoe to find in the first young gentleman who came into their shop
with a manuscript in his pocket another Scott, or perhaps a Byron, ready
to take the "world by storm. " Abandoning the old timid and grudging
system, he stood out as the general patron and payer of all promising
publications, and confounded not only his rivals in trade, but his very
authors by his unheard-of prices/' says Lord Cockburn, speaking of
Constable. "Ten, even twenty guineas a sheet for a review, £2000 or
£3000 for a single poem, and £1000 for two philosophical dissertations,
drew authors out of their dens, and made Edinburgh a literary mart
famous with strangers, and the pride of its own citizens." It was in one
great case a sort of madness while it lasted, and brought its natural
catastrophe : but the result in others was much prosperity and success,
and in the first stage it stimulated every brain, and half convinced the
world that Poetry, Romance, Philosophy, and even Criticism, were the
first crafts, and the most profitable in the world."
In the midst of this
excitement Blackwood alone of the Edinburgh booksellers kept a
comparatively cool head. No doubt he had his hopes and expectations, and
was always looking for the ' man of great genius ' to turn up ; but he
was not rash like Ballantyne or Constable, and was the only man ' who
may be said to have permanently mastered fortune.' One of the first of
his publications to call attention to his name was a catalogue of which
he was himself the author. It contained some 15,000 volumes, and was so
admirably arranged that it brought not only orders, but a number of the
most friendly letters. Sir Walter Scott wrote from Abbotsford, " I am
greatly obliged to you for your attention in forwarding your curious and
interesting catalogue. I am here ruining myself with plumbing and
building; so that adding to my library is in fact burning the candle at
both ends. But I am somewhat comforted by observing that the increased
value of books has nearly doubled the prime cost of my little collection
and proved me a wise man when I had much reason to account myself a
fool.' Dibdiu also wrote, and, like Sir Walter, enclosed an order, while
from Mr. John Murray there came a letter in which he said : ' Your
Catalogue I hear incessantly praised by Heber as the head of many
others; it does great credit to you in many respects.'
Some months before that,
however, Blackwood had received a letter from the great publishing
magnate in London of a much more important nature. In it he was
appointed Murray's Edinburgh agent in room of Ballantyne, with whose
mode of doing business Murray, after a short trial, had become
thoroughly dissatisfied. In Edinburgh the appointment was regarded as
one of the prizes of 'the Trade,' and its acquisition by Blackwood may
be said to have formed one of the critical moments in his business. The
relations between the two firms did not always work smoothly;
considering the characters of the two men it was scarcely to be expected
that they should ; still the association at once raised the young
bookseller—for such was the name by which publishers were then known—to
the first rank and, as the saying is, was 'good for his business.' He
had already begun to publish cautiously on his own pount, the most
conspicuous of his early publications being McCrie's Life of John Knox,
a work which, chiefly on account of the new point of view from which
Queen Mary was represented, caused at first much commotion, and though
somewhat one-sided and antiquated and not always to be trusted, is not
yet entirely superseded. To the London agency was soon added another,
the news of which Blackwood communicated to Murray in the following
letter :—
'John Ballantyne has
transferred to me all his retail customers, and makes me his retail
publisher here. This will be of very great use to me, as it interests
Walter Scott deeply in all my concerns. I have, of course, a stock of
all their books, and will therefore be able to supply you with any new
book of theirs 5 per cent, below sale. If you want any 8vo "Rokeby" when
ready, please write me. They have just published a very pretty poem, "Triermain,"
which Jeffrey talks of in the highest terms, and is to review in the
next number of the "Edinburgh." I have sent you 20 copies by yesterday's
smack, and enclosed "Widow's Lodgings," a novel which they have also
just published. I have not been able to hear who he [the author] is, nor
yet who is the author of "Triermain." . . . You maybe sure it is not Mr.
Terry.'
It was three years—to
Murray as well as to Blackwood three long and impatient years—before
this connection with Ballantyne bore any of the desired fruit. Waverley
and Guy Mannering had appeared, the first being brought out by Constable
and the other by Longman, and both Blackwood and Murray were as eager as
any others in ' the Trade ' to secure the publishing of any further work
which the Anonymous Author might produce. Both of them made some wild
guesses as to who he was, and both of them had a suspicion that he was
no other than Sir Walter—' either Walter Scott or the Devil' wrote one
of them—while it would appear from the above letter that Blackwood was
not without hopes that 'Walter Scott' might turn out the 'man of great
genius' for whom he was waiting. However, Ballantyne at last, after many
hints and promises, offered to Blackwood 'by instructions from the
author,' a work in four volumes to be called ' The Tales of My Landlord
;' each volume was to contain a separate tale, an arrangement which was
afterwards altered, and the work was thus to be of more than usual
importance, as including a succession of books. The terms were curious,
and involved the taking over of £600 of John Ballantyne's not very
saleable stock; but curious and hard as they were, they were eagerly
accepted by Blackwood— Murray taking a share in the business—and after
many delays and much vexation of spirit to the two publishers, they
issued the Black Dwarf the first of the 4 Tales.' Two editions were
sold, and a third was moving off, though much more slowly than was
expected, when Blackwood was unexpectedly informed by Ballantyne that he
had a fourth ready. Some angry letters were written, and some very
plausible excuses were made, but the matter was finally arranged by
Blackwood and Murray taking the edition over. So far good, but there was
worse to come. While Blackwood had 1200 copies of the fourth edition,
and Murray some hundreds more on hand, an advertisement suddenly
appeared that a fifth edition was about to be published by Constable.
This came upon the two publishers as a bolt from the blue. They
expostulated, and even talked of law, but it was of no use ; the thing
was definitely settled, they were told that no change would be made, and
no change was made.
This curious and painful
episode has never been explained, nor does Mrs. Oliphant contribute much
towards its explanation. It may be, however, that Scott had taken
offence at some plain spoken criticisms and suggestions as to the
winding up of the story which Blackwood had sent to him, through
Ballantyne, after reading the manuscript when first put into his hands.
At a later period Sir Walter himself criticised the tale, and, according
to Lockhart, ' completely adopted honest Blackwood's opinion,'
1 but at the moment he was in no mood to listen
to criticism. Immediately on receipt of Blackwood's letter, he wrote to
James Ballantyne :—
'Dear James,—I have
received Blackwood's impudent letter, God - his soul! Tell him and his
coadjutor that I belong to the Black Hussars of Literature, who neither
give nor receive criticism. I'll be cursed but this is the most impudent
proposal that ever was made.—W.S.
This certainly betrays
very considerable irritation, and if, as Mrs. Oliphant suggests, and not
without good reason, this was not the only note, and there were
suspicions that the work had been shown to others, the irritation would
not be merely passing : and it may be, that Scott at once resolved to
cease dealing with Blackwood at the earliest moment. But even this does
not account for Constable's unexpected advertisement and the way in
which the connection was severed. Mrs. Oliphant concludes her narrative
of the incident as follows :—
'As for Scott, for whose
spotless reputation everybody is concerned, my own opinion is that his
venture with these two new publishers [Blackwood and Murray] was
tentative, and it was quite on the cards that they might have secured
him, but for this irritating check: while on the other hand it was also
quite natural that he should have found the burden of James Ballantyne's
mediatorship unbearable, and felt that, without an additional disclosure
of his secret, which, whether wisely or foolishly, he was determined not
to make, his simplest method was to return to the man who did already
know, and with whom he could arrange at first hand, without any
interference of a fussy, though bland, go-between. Neither Murray nor
Blackwood throw any individual blame upon him, and he was, strictly
speaking, within his rights in transferring the book, as he had
expressly limited the arrangement to certain editions. The offensive
announcement of a fifth edition before the fourth was exhausted was no
doubt due to Constable, who thus celebrated his triumph over his
rivals.'
The conjecture which is
here made, is quite possible, but it is only a conjecture. Lockhart
gives a fairly long account of or, as he was called, Signor
Aldiborontophoscophornio. On October 4th, 1816, he sent the
following:—'Our application to the author of Tales of My Landlord has
been anything but successful, and in order to explain to you the reason
why I must decline to address him in this way in future, I shall copy
his letter verbatim :—My respects to our friends the Booksellers. I
belong to the Death-head Hussars of Literature, who neither take nor
give criticism. I am extremely sorry they showed my work to Gifford, nor
would I cancel a leaf to please all the critics of Edinburgh and London
; and so let that be as it is. They are mistaken if they think I don't
know when I am writing ill, as well as Gifford can tell me. I beg there
be no more communications with critics." Observe—that I shall at all
times be ready to convey anything from you to the author in a written
form, but I do not feel warranted to interfere further.' The reference
to Gifford may, as Mrs. Oliphant suggests, be due to the above being
probably an amalgamation of two notes.
the affair, which on M or
two points .Mrs. Oliphant correct but as to the transfer of the
publication of the book, all he says is, ' Circumstances ere long
occurred which carried the publication of the work into the hands of
Messrs. Constable.'* What these ' circumstances ' were he does not say,
nor do the numerous letters cited by Mrs. Oliphant throw sufficient
light upon them. Mr. Andrew Lang, in his Life of Lock-hart, has nothing
of importance to say about them, while in the Murray Memoirs the affair
is passed over as if there had never been any trouble about it, though
when replying to some query addressed to him ou the subject by Lockhart,
Murray speaks of having 'a vague notion that I owed the dropping of my
connexion with the Great Novelist to some trashy disputes between
Blackwood and the BalIantynes.' But as Mrs. Oliphant has presumably had
all the existing documents, which bear up the affair, in her hands, the
probability is that no explanation can now be given.
Meantime Mr. Blackwood
had removed from the South Bridge to 17 Princes Street, 'an address soon
made memorable as the headquarters of a literary group unequalled in
Edinburgh or within the limits of Great Britain.' Meantime, also, he had
added to the Murray agency that of Cadell & Davies, London, ' and had
shaken from his fingers for ever the dusty traces of old books.' As a
publisher his business grew apace, and his disappointment over losing
the connection with ' the man of great genius ' had hardly begun when he
discovered a woman of genius, in the person of Miss Ferrier. At first
her correspondence with him seems to have been under an assumed name.
When returning her manuscript, Blackwood writes to her in the most
enthusiastic way, telling her, in reply to her modest request for
suggestions, that ' The whole construction and execution of the work
appear to him so admirable that it would almost be presumption in any
one to offer corrections to such a writer,' and ' begs to assure the
author that unmeaning compliment is the furthest from his thoughts,' and
that ' he flatters himself that at no distant period he will have the
high delight of assuring the writer in person of the heartful sincerity
of the opinion he has ventured to offer.' The work in question was
Marriage, and on its completion Mr. Blackwood, notwithstanding the
extremely high laudation he had passed upon it, offered and paid her
only £150 for the copyright of the book, 'or rather, I think,' says Mrs.
Oliphant, ' of the first edition.' For Inheritance, however, he paid her
£1000; but Destiny, her third book, he apparently declined to publish.
Cadell gave her £1700 for it. The account which Mrs. Oliphant gives of
Miss Ferrier, though long, is worth quoting, inasmuch as it contains her
opinion on Miss Austen as well as upon Miss Ferrier :—
'Everybody now knows
something of the witty and delightful "Sister Shadow," to whom Sir
Walter paid so beautiful a tribute. She came from the same original,
genial, sagacious, and humourous race, that strata of Scottish gentry
deposited in Edinburgh, and owing, perhaps, some readiness and flow of
social gifts to the associations of the northern capital, and the
constant intercourse and sharpening of its wits—which produced Sir
Walter himself, and was his sister spirit in more than writing. She was
afterwards connected with the circle of wits who inspired the magazine
through her nephew, J. F. Ferrier, the well-known metaphysician, and his
witty wife, the daughter of Professor Wilson : but these were all
"unborn faces" at the time of Susan Ferrier's literary beginning. There
was as yet no Magazine; and Wilson was an unknown young university man,
known at least only for athletic feats, and an inclination towards
poetry of the sentimental kind, "Marriage," came out of the cheerful and
critical centre of Edinburgh society, as ''Sense and Sensibility" came
from the serene levels of English country life, with no warning,
floating upwards like the tiny balloons which were one of the wonders of
that day, carrying each the little circle of a new undiscovered world to
the bigger universe around. Miss Ferrier was as Scotch as Miss Austen
was English ; but the Edinburgh lady had not that fine and pointed
cynicism with which her contemporary touched the lines of the minute
all-embracing picture. There was much fine sentiment and ideal
portraiture mingled with the broader humour and larger laugh of the
Scot, and perhaps her superfine Marys and Gertrudes took away a little
of the unmingled effect of the other ; though Miss Girzy, on the other
hand, is as amusing as Miss Bates, although she has a much sweeter
attraction. The two writers may, however, be now said to occupy a very
similar level, and there are very few names which can be placed beside
them. We feel disposed to believe that part of the divine element which
had gone to the making of Scott, being left over, had framed these other
secondary yet not inferior souls. It was Mr. Blackwood, ever thoughtful
of giving pleasure to his friends, who sent to Miss
Ferrier "The concluding
sentence of the new 'Tales of My Landlord,' which are to be published
to-morrow." This consisted, if the reader perchance may have forgotten,
of the following words:—"If the present author, himself a phantom, may
be permitted to distinguish a brother, or perhaps a sister, shadow, he
would mention in particular the author of the very lively work entitled
' Marriage.' " '
At first ' Miss Ferrier,
like her contemporary, Miss Austen, shrank with a horrified femininity
from any betrayal of identity/ On one occasion her packets of proof 'are
directed,' Mrs. Oliphant tell us, ' under cover to a friend, as if they
had been clandestine love-letters.' Strange to say, ' in her old age she
was so completely occupied with religious questions as to dislike and
disapprove of the delightful works of her earlier days.' This, however,
has not affected their popularity, or her position as a writer of
fiction. There she still retains a high aud quite individual place as '
one of a baud of women who form a sort of representative group in their
way of the three countries, which, it is to be hoped, no unpropitious
fate will ever sunder or make to be other than one.'
After his disappointment
in respect to the ' Tales of My Landlord,' Mr. Blackwood, we are told,
became 'impatient of bookselling and of the moderate risks and rewards
of a humdrum publishing business' and set all his faculties on the watch
'for an opportunity to step forth from the usual routine and make a
distinct place for himself.' He seems to have corresponded on the
subject with Murray, who, in one of his letters, gives him some good
fatherly advice, and among other things suggests that, having laid the
foundations of a solid retail business, he should go on to improve it,
until it could be ' consigned to the care of attentive clerks,' and that
he himself should gradually rise 'into the higher duties of cultivating
the young men of genius of the day, whom your present situation and
literary attractions and attentions of all kinds will indisputably draw
around you.' Some parts of this letter Blackwood, in all likelihood,
resented, but the suggestions just mentioned he adopted. Upon one of
them, indeed—the latter —he had been acting for some time; for just as
Murray had thrown open his drawing-rooms in Albemarle Street to the
literary loungers of Loudon, so Blackwood, always on the Iook out for
the ' man of great genius' whom he was to help to fame, and who was to
help him to fortune, had had a room in his premises in Princes Street
fitted up, where 'the young men of genius ' of Edinburgh were already
wont to congregate. As to the way in which to cultivate and use them, he
had a brilliant example before him in the Edinburgh which was then
wildly careering in the first flush of its triumphant success. The
Quarterly had been started in opposition to it, but although often
brilliant enough and fierce enough, was usually grave, and was not
answering the famous Whig Review in the way it was expected, or, at
least, in the way in which Blackwood thought it might and ought to be
answered. Accordingly, after much cogitation, though very little is
known about its genesis, he set up the Edinburgh Monthly Magazine under
the editorship of, and apparently in a sort of co-partnership with
Messrs. Pringle & Cleghorn. Great things were expected from it, but from
the first it appears to have been doomed to failure. Blackwood
complained of the editors, and the editors complained of his
interference, and with the sixth number it ceased, but only to appear in
its seventh number under a changed name and under different guidance.
While the necessary notice to Messrs. Pringle & Cleghorn was running
out, Blackwood wrote to Messrs. Baldwin, Cradock & Co. in London : 'It
is most vexatious stopping the magazine. ... I have, however, made
arrangements with a gentleman of first-rate talents by which I will
begin a new work of a far superior kiud.' Whether this 'gentleman of
first-rate talents' was Wilson or Lockhart; whether the phrase was used
for both of them; or whether it was used by Blackwood after the fashion
he subsequently used 'the editor' or 'the gentleman who has charge of
the department,' need not be inquired. As all the world knows, Blackwood
had lighted upon two men of genius, and to them mainly Mag a owed its
first success. Mrs. Oliphant gives a vivid description of them in their
young days when they formed part of the company in 17 Princes Street:
'Among the frequenters of
this lively company were two young men who would have been remarkable
anywhere, if only for their appearance and talk, had nothing more
remarkable ever been developed by them,— one a young man of grand form
and mien, with the thews and sinews of a athlete, and a front like Jove,
to threaten and command. Jove is not often portrayed with waving yellow
locks and ruddy countenance, yet no smaller semblance would be a fit
image for the northern demi-god with those brilliant blue eyes which are
almost more effective in penetrating keenness than the dark ones with
which that quality is more frequently associated. He was a genial giant,
but not a mild one. Genius and fun and wit were no less a part of his
nature than wrath and vehemence, and a power of swift and sudden
slaughter, corrected in its turn by a large radiance of gaiety and good
humour—sudden in all things, ready to fell an intruder to the earth or
to welcome him as a brother, swift to slay, yet instant to relent.
' The other, who divided
with him the honours of this witty meeting, was John Wilson's opposite
in everything. He was slim and straight and self-contained, a man of
elegance and refinement—words dear to the time —in mind as in person,
dark of hair and fine of feature, more like a Spaniard than a Saxon, a
perfect contrast to the Berserker hero by his side. They were both of
that class which we flatter ourselves in Scotland produces many of the
finest flowers of humanity, the mingled product of the double
nation—pure Scot by birth and early training, with the additional polish
and breadth of the highest English education : Glasgow College, as it
was then usual to call that abode of learning, with Oxford University to
complete and elaborate the strain. Wilson of Magdalen, Lockhart of
Balliol, a Snell scholar, the best that Scotland could send to England.
The career of both had been, perhaps, more brilliant than studious ; but
both had left Oxford in all the glories of success, first-class men, the
pride of dons and tutors.
' . . . . They were both
newly fledged advocates, members of the numberless and jocular band who
trod the courts of the Parliament House, waiting for the briefs which
there, as elsewhere, are so slow to come. Little recked these young and
laughing philosophers of the absence of fees and steady work. They were
young enough to prefer their freedom and boundless opportunity of making
fun of everybody to all that was serious and useful. Lockhart was a
caricaturist of no small powers. Both of them were only too keen to see
the ludicrous aspect of everything, and the age gave them an
extraordinary licence in expressing it—a licence incomprehensible to us
nowadays, and which is nowhere so tempting, as it is nowhere so
dangerous, as in a small community where everybody knows everybody, and
personal allusions are instantly taken up and understood. This pair of
friends met almost daily at Mr. Blackwood's saloon in Princes Street, or
came together arm in arm from Parliament House, in their high collars
and resplendent shirt frills and Hessian boots. The boots form a
splendid feature in the caricature-sketches, in which Lockhart
represents himself stiff and straight, with the little tassels bobbing
at his knees. Such was the costume of the day, and such were the heroes
of Edinburgh youth, men of endless faculty and inextinguishable mirth,
men neither ungenial nor ungenerous, yet unable to deny themselves a
jest, and tempted to find in the outcries of their victims rather a
relish the more to their sometimes cruel fun than an argument to give it
up.'
The secret of the new
magazine which was to take the place of the unfortunate Edinburgh
Monthly and fight the Edinburgh Review leaked out. Blackwood blamed
Pringle and Cleghorn, and believed they had disclosed it in revenge for
their three months' warning. However the preparations went on and Mrs.
Oliphant draws a lively picture of what may be imagined to have taken
place in the saloon in Princes Street, 'the bustle and commotion,' 'the
endless consultations and wild suggestions'—
Lockhart, pensive and
serious, almost melancholy, in the fiery fever of satire and ridicule
that possessed him, launching his javelin with a certain pleasure in the
mischief as well as the most perfect self-abandonment to the impulse of
the moment; Wilson, with Homeric roars of laughter, and a recklessness
still less under control, not caring whom he attacked nor with what
bitterness, apparently unconscious of the sting till it was inflicted,
when he collapsed into ineffectual penitence ; Hogg bustling in, all
flushed and heated with a new idea, in which the rustic daffing of the
countryside gave a rougher force to the keen shafts of the gentlemen.'
Blackwood also was there
admiring, enthusiastic and indomitable. As the time of publication drew
near he was not without his bad moments. When he carried the new number
home on the eve of its publication, he for once took no notice of the
children, who rushed out of the nursery to meet him, but went straight
to the drawing-room, Mrs. Oliphant tells us, ' where his wife, not
excitable, sat in her household place, busy no doubt for her fine
family; and coming in to the warm glow of the light, he threw down the
precious magazine at her feet. There is that that will give you what is
your due— what I always wished you to have," he said, with the
half-sobbing laugh of the great crisis. She gave him a characteristic
word, half-satirical, as was her way, not outwardly moved, with a shake
of the head and a doubt.' ' He was always sanguine,' Mrs. Oliphant
continues; ' but she had no bee in her bonnet. Sometimes he called her a
wet blanket when she thus damped his ardour—but not, I think, that
night.' Evidently all parties concerned in the venture were that night
worked up to a high pitch of excitement.
The contents of the
number and the effect they produced are matters of history, and need
hardly detain us. As for the first the most memorable was the Chaldee
MS., of which Mrs. Oliphant gives a good account, and which from the
second edition of the number was withdrawn. The two other notable pieces
in the number were a virulent attack, quite uncalled for, upon Coleridge
and his Biographia Literaria, ' which,' as Mrs. Oliphant remarks, ' was
of tenfold deeper guilt than the Chaldean vision;' and a ' still more
virulent and most unpardonable assault upon what the writer dubbed The
Cockney School of Poetry signed with the initial Z.' This Mrs. Oliphant
characterises as ' the most offensive of all,' and adds, ' we are
obliged to allow that it was an attack for which there is no word to be
said, and which can only arouse our astonishment and dismay that the
hand of a gentleman could have produced it, not to speak of a critic.'
Of the editor who could admit it, nothing is said. There were, of
course, other pieces in the number, but these were the more notable, and
we have preferred to let the annalist herself describe them. In
Edinburgh the Chaldee MS. alone seems to have attracted attention. There
was enough in it to set the whole town by the ears. Describing its
effect Mrs. Oliphant says : ' Edinburgh woke up next morning with a roar
of laughter, with a shout of delight, with convulsions of rage and
offence. ... It ran through every group of men and into every company
like wild-fire.' Copies, we are told by Mr. R. P. Gilles, 'were handed
about with manuscript notes identifying the principal characters.' The
result, however, was much more serious than was probably anticipated.
Actions were raised in the Court of Session, Baldwin and Cradock
withdrew their names from the title page, and Blackwood, as Sir Walter
Scott said, was 4 sent to Coventry by " the Trade." ' But in spite of
all, the first number served its purpose, and for a time Maga kept on as
it had begun, though there were no more Chaldee M.SS, prospering almost
beyond the most sanguine expectations of its founder.
The question of
responsibility has often been discussed, but it is here practically
settled. According to Sir W. Scott, as cited by Kirkpatrick Sharpe in a
letter to Constable, Blackwood averred that the Chaldee MS. had been
inserted 'against his will,' and in a letter to Laidlaw Blackwood wrote,
'I anxiously hope you will not be displeased by the Chaldee MS. There
were various opinions as to the propriety of publishing this. The editor
took his own way, and I cannot interfere with him.' And again, when
excusing the article on the ' Cockney School of Poetry,' he professes
his want of ' control over the measures of my editor,' and says, ' my
editor has written to the author, etc.' To Laidlaw he wrote on another
occasion, referring again to the Chaldee MS.:—
'No one can regret more
than I do that this article appeared. After I saw it in proof I did
everything I could to prevent it, and at last succeeded in getting the
editor to leave it out. In the course of a day, however, he changed his
mind, and determined that it should be in. I was therefore placed in a
terrible dilemma ; and as I must have stopped the magazine if I did not
allow the editor to have his own way, I was obliged to submit.'
Excepting the
mystification about ' the Editor,' there is no necessity for questioning
the accuracy of this. Searchings of hearts there would certainly be :
but it sounds strange beside the assertion of Lockhart: ' The history of
it is this : Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd, sent up an attack upon
Constable the bookseller, respecting some private dealings of his with
Blackwood. Wilson and I liked the idea of introducing the whole panorama
of the town in that sort of dialect. We drank punch one night from eight
till eight in the morning, Blackwood being by with anecdotes, and the
result is before you.' 2 In a note to one of
the above cited letters to Laidlaw in which ' The Editor' occurs Mrs.
Oliphant says :—
' This title is often but
vaguely given to some undiscoverable person in the early days of the
Magazine, the convenient partner who was always responsible and ever
regrettably inclined to take his own way. As a matter of fact the
Magazine was, as might be said officially, in commission, with a
governing body of three, no individual of which was supreme, though the
publisher lamented the self-will of the editor, and the editor
vituperated with much force the obstinacy of the publisher.' (Vol. I.,
150).
And again, when
discussing the matter formally she says :—
'I do not think that the
reader, after the glimpses into the Blackwood correspondence, which I
have been able to give, can have much doubt that the Magazine was, as I
have said, in commission, the committee of three occupying
intermittently the supreme chair—one number sometimes in one man's
charge, sometimes in another's, now one judgment uppermost, but the veto
always in Blackwood's hands.'
The present writer must
own to very grave doubts indeed as to the correctness of this commission
theory; and the last phrase just quoted—' the veto always in Blackwood's
hands' —is conclusive evidence against it. Its real meaning is that
Blackwood's judgment was always uppermost. He might listen, and did
listen, like the shrewd man he was, to the opinions of others, but it
was he who always gave the final and unappealable decision. It was he,
too, who carried on the formal correspondence, and, so far as we can
make out from the correspondence, discharged all the other duties of the
editor. This, we take it, was Mrs. Oliphant's opinion when not
theorising. Wilson and Lockhart, we know, were never the editors, either
jointly or severally. It was always Blackwood who said what should and
what should not be in. Amid the recklessness and rollicking mirth of
Wilson and Lockhart he always kept a cool head and had a sharp eye to
business. Even in this matter of the Chaldee MS., as. Mrs. Oliphant
says, ' William Blackwood was too sagacious and too completely a man of
the world not to know exactly what effect' it ' would produce. If the
fun went to his head, as to the heads of others who produced it, it
never did so sufficiently to make him unaware of the risk he was
running. . . . We cannot doubt for a moment that he knew what he was
about. He was not a man to be carried off his feet at such a critical
moment—or rather he permitted himself to be carried off his feet,
casting prudence to the winds by the inspiration of that other prudence
which sometimes sees it the wisest thing to set every thing on the turn
of a balance, and or, as it is put on a subsequent page, his ' keen eye
saw the advantages to be reaped from the very disadvantages, the
reckless imprudence and dash, which are instruments in a cool and steady
hand as good as any. ... He withheld and subdued, when it was necessary,
with great unconscious skill, with the constant steadiness and sense
which always have their influence—and which were strengthened even by
his enthusiasm, by the flow of wit and genius, the only things that ever
went to his head.' On the whole it seems to the present writer that the
theory of a commission is inadmissable, that the real editor was
Blackwood, that the responsibility lay with him, and that his references
to the Editor were mere attempts, doubtless justifiable, to conceal his
identity. In Wilson and Lockhart, he had got his ' young men of
genius,'" who were to lift him to fame, and having attached them to his
chariot, he assumed the reins, and while listening to advice, would
brook no interference in the actual management of the chariot. Wilson
was his chief assistant and Lockhart his second, but longo intervallo,
though more reliable.
The blame for the
misdeeds of the Magazine fell, as every one knows, on Wilson and
Lockhart, but chiefly on the latter ; and justly so, Mrs. Oliphant seems
to think.
' "The scorpion which
delighted to sting the faces of men," she remarks, ' was no undeserved
nickname, but seems to describe his peculiar character with considerable
insight. He was not a swashbuckler like Wilson, making his sword whistle
round his head, and cutting men down on every side. His satire was
mischievous, virulent, not so much from hate as from nature. It was as
if he had a physical necessity for discharging that point of venom,
which he emitted suddenly without warning, without passion or
excitement, proceeding on his way gaily with perfect unconcern where the
dart was flung. It is impossible to imagine anything more unlike the
roaring choruses of conviviality which were supposed to distinguish
Ambrose's than this reticent, sensitive, attractive, yet dangerous
youth, by whose charm such a giant as Scott was immediately subjugated,
and who slew his victims mostly by the midnight oil, not by any blaze of
gaiety, or in the accumulated fervour of social sarcasm. From him came
the most of those sharp things which the victims could not forget.
Wilson hacked about him, distributing blows right and left, delivered
sometimes for fun, though sometimes with the most extraordinary impulse
of perversity, in the impetus of his career. Lockhart put in his string
in a moment, inveterate, instantaneous, with the effect of a barbed
dart—yet almost, as it seemed, with the mere intention of giving point
to his sentences, and 110 particular feeling at all.'
This is the traditional
view and we have no intention at present of challenging it, though, it
seems to us, that while responsible for whatever he wrote, the
responsibility for its appearance in the Magazine must be laid on other
shoulders than his. On this point much might be said, but in reference
to it, in fairness to Lockhart himself, and with reference chiefly to
the remark made by Mrs. Oliphant, that the ' risk ' of publishing the
Chaldee manuscript was Blackwood's ' alone ' and ' would not touch those
dashing young men any more than any other excellent joke would do,'* the
following words of Lockhart may be cited. They are given by Mr. Andrew
Lang, who remarks, 'it was an ill day for Lockhart when he first put his
pen at the service' of Maga, and occur in the letter Lockhart wrote in
reply to one he had received from Haydon the painter, complaining of his
early cruelties.
'I cannot be indifferent
to your severe though generous reflections about my early literary
escapades. You are willing to make allowances, but allow me to say, you
have not understood the facts of the case. They were bad enough, but not
so bad as you make them out. In the first place, I was a raw boy, who
had never had the least connection either with politics or controversies
of any kind, when, arriving in Edinburgh in October 1817, I found my
friend John Wilson (ten years my senior) busied in helping Blackwood out
of a scrape he had got into with some editors of his Magazine, and on
Wilson's asking me to try my hand at some scribbleries in his aid, I sat
down to do so with as little malice as if the assigned subject had been
the Court of Pekin. But the row in Edinburgh, the lordly Whigs having
considered persiflage as their own fee-simple, was really so extravagant
that when I think of it now, the whole story seems wildly incredible.
Wilson and 1 were singled out to bear the whole burden of sin, though
there were abundance of other criminals in the concern ; and, by-and-by,
Wilson passing for being a very eccentric fellow, and I for a cool one,
even he was allowed to get off comparatively scot free, while I, by far
the youngest and least experienced of the set, and who alone had 110
personal grudges against any of Blackwood's victims, remained under such
an accumulation of wrath and contumely, as would have crushed me
utterly, unless for the buoyancy of extreme youth. I now think with deep
sadness of the pain my jibes and jokes inflicted on better men than
myself, and I can say that I have omitted in my mature years no
opportunity of trying to make reparation where I really had been the
offender. But I was not the doer of half the deeds even you seem to set
down to my account, nor can I, in the face of much evidence printed and
unprinted, believe that, after all, our Ebony (as we used to call the
man and his book) had half so much to answer for as the more regular
artillery which the old Quarterly played incessantly, in these days, on
the same parties, ... I believe the only individuals whom Blackwood ever
really and essentially injured were myself and Wilson. Our feelings and
happiness were disturbed and shattered in consequence of that
connection. I was punished cruelly and irremediably in my worldly
fortunes, for the outcry cut off all prospects of professional
advancement from me. I soon saw that the Tory Ministers and law officers
never would give me anything in that way. . . . Thus I lost an
honourable profession, and had, after a few years of withering hopes, to
make up my mind for embracing the precarious, and, in my opinion,
intolerably grievous fate of the dependent on literature. It is true
that I now regard this too with equanimity, but that is only because I
have undergone so many disappointments of every kind, crowned by an
irreparable bereavement, that I really have lost the power of feeling
acutely on any subject connected with my own worldly position.'
This was written by
Lockhart while he was still suffering under the blow that struck at his
heart, the loss of his first wife. It does not exonerate him from all
blame, but, as his biographer says, 'his pleas of youth, of association
with an elder friend who should have set him a different example, and of
freedom from personal malice, may be accepted even by severe judges.' At
the same time it shows that in publishing the Chaldee manuscript,
Blackwood, contrary to what is stated by Mrs. Oliphant, was not the only
one who ran any risk, but that whatever the consequences of it were to
him, to others, and especially to Lockhart, they were serous, more
serious, we imagine, than either Wilson or Lockhart ever dreamed they
might or could be.
After narrating the
establishment of the Magazine, which, having sowed the wild oats of its
youth, gradually assumed that air of gravity which it still maintains
under the beard of Buchannan, one would naturally expect that the Annals
would begin to lose their interest; and so they might, but for the
extraordinary skill with which Mrs. Oliphant weaves into her canvas a
remarkable portrait gallery of the principal contributors to Maga. This
gallery contains bright and almost inimitable sketches of many of the
chief literary men of the early part of the century. Wilson and Lockhart
have of course the largest space. After them come Hogg and Maginn, the
Captain Shandon of Thackeray; De Quincey, John Gait, of Annals of the
Parish fame, and John Wilson Croker; Croly, author of Salathiel, now
well nigh forgotten ; Gleig, the Chaplain-General, who published his
novel The Subaltern in the pages of Maga in 1826, and was still a
contributor sixty years later, and Thomas Doubleday, 'a Radical
politician, poet, dramatist, biographer,' now forgotten ; Mrs. Remans,
whose name is still remembered, and Miss Catherine Bowles, who
afterwards married Southey; Mr. Alaric A. Watts also appears, as a
chronicler, but chiefly of smaller beer. In what may be called a second
series or section of the gallery, we have Warren, author of The Diary of
a late Physician, Ten Thousand a Year, etc., afterwards a Commissioner
in Lunacy, Michael Scott, the author of Tom Cringle's Log, John
Sterling, the gentle Delta, the Rev. James White, Frederick Hardman,
Bulwer Lytton, Sir Edward Hamley, George Henry Lewes, and his '
mysterious friend,' George Eliot : Sir Theodore Martin, Wytoun, and
Laurence Oliphant. One of them, though by no means the most elaborate,
we will venture to transcribe as a sort of specimen.
'The other contributor
was the young naval officer who, both in his stirring fiction and in his
letters, was a complete type of the dashing and dare-devil seaman
familiar to the imagination of these times, Tom Cringle —in the world
and among ordinary men, Michael Scott. He appeared in the Magazine, in
two works, "Tom Cringle's Log" and the "Cruise of the Midge," full of
spirit and humour and the genuine breath of the sea, but had a very
brief literary existence, disappearing after these productions without
further sign. His letters are full chiefly of revisions and corrections
of detached portions of his stories as he sent them, and he seems to
have made his publisher in many cases the medium of the corrections,
denoting how a line is to be changed at the foot of page 30, or a new
reading substituted for the end of a chapter, with a delightful
indifference to the fact that he was writing to a man much more closely
occupied than himself and whose business it certainly was not to correct
proofs. " I never would have ventured to bother you thus, but you see
you have spoilt me, old man," the careless sailor writes. Even the
manuscript itself he seems to have sent in the most chaotic state,
describing how he has " spun the within" (that is, written the enclosed)
when on a visit, composing it "By fits and starts as I could steal time,
but the pain of copying it out fair—I am such a bad penman—is too much
for me to face." Thereupon he beseeches Mr. Blackwood "To select out of
your pandemonium some champollion of a devil, skilful and patient enough
to decypher my hieroglyphics." "Get some one," he adds, "to correct my
French faults—I say, see that when the natives or me [sic] speak French
that it be grammatical [sic] ; as for Bang's, let it stand as I write
it." The confidence which this reckless young writer feels in the man
who had at once divined his merit and superintended his work is
touchingly and simply expressed : " Tom Cringle to W. Blackwood. Now, my
dear sir, make some one write particularly how you come on. I am more
distressed than I can tell you at your continued indisposition. When you
were well and at the helm, I used to carry sail fearlessly, for I knew
you would always keep me in 'the right course.'"
'Very few have been the
editors, still fewer the publishers, thus addressed ; nothing could be
more true than the benefits to which this simple acknowledgement bears
witness.'
Interspersed between
these lively and thoroughly enjoyable pictures are chapters biographical
and publishing. Mr. William Blackwood died on the 16th of September,
1834, after a career as a publisher of almost unexampled prosperity.
Though very nearly a 'heaven-born publisher,' there were some instances
in which his judgment was at fault. Notwithstanding the enthusiasm with
which he wrote about Miss Ferrier's first work, he does not seem to have
had any conception of their enduring character, and, as we have seen,
declined to publish her third book. Though continually on the look-out
for ' young men of genius,' he was not always successful in their
detection. When Thackeray offered him his ' Irish Sketch-book' he
declined it. 'These sketches were not in these days,' Mrs. Oliphant
remarks, ' considered good enough for the Magazine'! A similar blunder
was made when the great ' Hoggarty Diamond ' was declined. Pen Owen, on
the other hand, which he declared to be ' a very extraordinary work,'
did not at all fulfil his expectations. He had sent one £500 for the
work; and 'We think,' says Mrs. Oliphant, 'it was Mrs. Blackwood who was
the more wise in this transaction, when, " as a good wife and the mother
of eight children," she demurred to the despatch of the second £500 to
follow the first before this anonymous book was ever published/ Acute
man of business as he was, Blackwood was sometimes carried away by his
enthusiasm. Nor did he always get his own way. His rule as Editor was
gentle, but somewhat autocratic, and even Lockhart, though they always
remained friendly, is known to have grumbled against it. In money
matters they did not always see eye to eye, but those were the palmy
days of magazine contributors. They were not then as plentiful as
blackberries, and contributors like Lockhart were able to make their own
terms. With Murray, as already hinted, Blackwood did not always get on
well. They were always friendly, but there was always more or less of
irritation or bickering between them. Blackwood refused to sell ' Don
Juan;' Murray refused to take M'Crie's Life of Melville, because,
forsooth, it had been published in Edinburgh before it had been
published in London. Murray, who had invested £1000 in the Magazine,
wanted a regularly appointed and responsible editor, Blackwood did not.
While Blackwood was pleased with the Magazine, Murray was not, and, as
remonstrances were of no avail, he withdrew his money. Altogether, the
correspondence between the two publishers, while instructive, as it
could scarcely fail to be, is entertaining.
Of Blackwood's seven
sons, two went out to India, one, William—whom we shall hear of
hereafter as the 'Major'— before his death, and the other, Archibald,
after it. Six of them stood around his grave—the eldest twenty-eight,
the youngest a child of eleven—and the business fell under the direction
of Alexander and Robert. Of these, Alexander was 'the more literary,'
and Robert, 'the more energetic and enterprising in all things connected
with the trade.' It is of the first that we hear most. When nineteen,
his father adopted the very sensible plan of sending him up to London to
learn the minutiae of his business, and very conscientiously the young
man seems to have devoted himself to it, ' collecting' ' with the blue
bag on his shoulder,' and anxiously trying to keep |his Rounts square.
Hisfcttefrs home are among the most interesting in the volume, full of
trade and literary gossip, often amusing, and always full of anxiety
about home and business. ' There will be a famous opportunity for
publishing this season,' he writes, 'as both Constable and Murray are
taken up about other matters, and I hope you will get something very
good.' He hears that Lockhart is not happy about the contributors to the
Quarterly, the Editorship of which he had just assumed, and 'is
delighted to report,' says Mrs. Oliphant, ' that Mrs. Hughes had
whispered in his ear, " You will be better without him."' He was the
first to advise his father of the catastrophe which was about to fall
upon the publishing trade both in Edinburgh and in London, and '
involved consequences more noteworthy than even the ruin of
Constable—the catastrophe of Scott and the heroic struggle that
followed.'
'There is a dreadful
scarcity of money in the city just now,' he writes, ' and I have heard
it rumoured that Whittaker and Knight Stacey were both on the point of
crashing. If Whittaker goes, Waugh & Innes must go ; therefore 1 hope
you will not give him any accommodation, as you might just as well throw
away your money at once. I have learned that Hurst & Robertson's bills
have been returned to-day. Later he writes: ' Everybody seems to be
distracted just now, and even Longman's people are said to be in great
difficult}'.' Still later he writes, referring to the ruin of Constable
: ' This business will make you the first bookseller in Scotland and I
think the Whigs will feel this most dreadfully.'
When he and his brother
Robert took charge of the business, though young, they were, as Lockhart
said, 'men in mind and character.' They conducted the business on the
old lines and worked together as one mind. Unfortunately Alexander was
somewhat of an invalid, and had frequently to give up business in order
to go in search of health. The next of the brothers to enter the
business was John, whom Mrs. Oliphant describes as ' perhaps the most
gifted of Mr. Blackwood's sons.' As a boy, he is said to have been '
idle and thoughtless,' and according to the family report was ' never so
far up in school as he ought to have been.' His father described him as
a very quick and thoughtless creature,' and says: 'His memory is
capital, and he can give an account of whatever he reads,' ' even,' he
adds, ' if it be some chapters of the Bible.' His brother Alexander
calls him ' a perfect biographer,' ' a very idle scholar, but,' says
he,' reads history from morning to night.' Like his older brother, John
was sent to London to learn the business, and, like him, became
acquainted with the mysteries of the blue bag. Afterwards he took charge
of the London branch of the business, in Pall Mall, when it was first
opened, and became acquainted with most of the literary men about London
with some of whom he struck up an intimate acquaintance, as, for
instance, Delane of The Times, and Thackeray, Hardman and Phillips,
Warren, Lord Lyttoo, and G. H. Lewes. On the death of Alexander in 1845,
after superintending the removal of the ' Branch' to Paternoster Row, he
returned to Edinburgh, and took his brother's place as Editor of the
Magazine. By this time the business had been greatly extended. Duriug
the lifetime of William Blackwood it had already been removed to the
more convenient premises, where it is now carried on, in George Street,
and after his death, on the initiative of Robert, the firm added to the
publishing business that of printing; and while John took in hand the
Magazine and the general literary work, Robert superintended the other
branch of the business. This arrangement, however, did not last long.
Four years after Alexander's death, Robert succumbed, and the 'Major'
was recalled from India to take his place. The head of the firm is now
Mr. William Blackwood the second, the Major's son.
Scattered throughout the
Annals are abundant notes of the works which from time to time were
issued from this great publishing house in Edinburgh. Besides those
already mentioned are many others, the bare enumeration of whose titles
would make up a considerable catalogue. Among the earlier was Irving's
Life of George Buchanan, which, Mrs. Oliphant remarks, ' came with
special appropriateness from the publisher, who, as Hogg said, 'cared
for nothing that did not come under the beard of Geordie Buchanan,'
meaning the
Magazine, upon the front
cover of which is the familiar face of the great Scottish humanist.
Others were Scott's Malachi Malagroiother, the Highland Society's Gaelic
Dictionary, Wilson's Isle of Palms, etc., and Hogg's Queen Hyncle,
besides ' a phalanx of serial publications,' and Henry Stephen's Book of
the Farm, ' which for a great many years was as a small but very sure
landed estate to both author and publisher.' Pollok's Course of Time, a
poem now we fear very little read, was an ' immense success.' It '
became one of the most popular of books, passing through edition after
edition until it reached that desirable phase of becoming a prize book
for the diligent -scholars of Sunday and other schools—than which
nothing-could be more advantageous, from a material point of view.' The
Statistical Account of Scotland was another great undertaking. But the
great 'stand-by' of the house for many years was Alison's History of
Europe. Its success was extraordinary. Edition after edition was issued.
' When everything else was languid, it continued to sell. " A number of
people," says young John Blackwood, then just beginning to take an
active share in the business, "seem to say to themselves every two or
three days, 'Come let's have a set;'" and a set was no small matter, not
lightly to be undertaken by those who had a limited purse or limited
bookshelves. It became a work which no gentleman's library could do
without.' Its fame has since considerably fallen, though it has still
its readers. Among novels issued with the Blackwood imprint in these
early days one of the most popular was Captain Hamilton's Cyril
Thornton. Another was Gleig's Subaltern. But the fame of both was
exceeded by Warren's Diary of a Late Physician and Ten Thousand a Year,
etc. These seem to have taken the public by storm, and to have had an
immense vogue—a circumstance extremely gratifying to Warren's
complacency. In fashionable circles they are now almost forgotten, and
their readers are few; but in some circles their popularity is still
maintained. Only the other day we were shown a copy of Now and Then,
belonging to a public library, which was simply worn to tatters, and had
been set aside to be replaced, and were assured by the official in
charge, that ' all Warren's are immensely popular.' Among other
successes in the same line were Gait's Annals of a Parish, etc., and
Lord Lytton's The Caxtons, My Novel, and Ernest Maltravers. A more
important undertaking was Billings' Baronial Antiquities, the cost of
production being estimated at the enormous sum of £10,450. Later than
these came Hamley's Story of the Campaign, the campaign being the
Crimean, and Kinglake's History of the Crimean War. The publication of
this last, however, is here only hinted at.
Among the brightest
chapters in the Annals are those which narrate George Eliot's connection
with the publishers. Like Miss Ferrier and Miss Austen, she shrunk, at
first, from discovering her identity, and her writings, as every one
knows, were introduced to the Blackwoods by G. H. Lewes. Lewes described
her ' as of a timid temper, one whom it was impossible to persuade that
his production was of any value or importance, and quite unaccustomed to
the mode of writing in which he now made his first essay.' After reading
'The Sad Fortunes of the Rev. Amos Barton,' Mr. John Blackwood was of
opinion that it would 'do,' but desired to see more, and concludes one
of his letters to Lewes by saying, ' I am glad to hear that your friend
is, as I supposed, a clergyman. Such a subject is best in clerical
hands, and some of the pleasantest and least prejudiced correspondents I
have ever had are English clergymen.' He was anxious, of course, to
break through the incognito. Major Blackwood paid a visit to the Lewes
pair at Richmond, hoping to do so, but wrote, ' I saw, " a Mrs. Lewes,"'
but ' G. E. did not show; he is such a timid fellow Lewes said.' The
fictitious character, indeed, was kept up for three years, and was then
only removed in consequence of the impostor Joseph Liggins claiming to
be the author of Adam Bede. In George Eliot, however, the Blackwoods
found an author of a somewhat different character from Miss Ferrier and
Lord Lytton. She desired neither their corrections nor their criticism,
but decidedly objected to them. Her letters exhibit a remarkable talent
for business, and in one of them she roundly takes her publishers to
task for not advertising one of her books as she thought it ought to
have been. Her business letters, however, though written by herself,
proceeded in reality from Lewes, who was always at hand to direct her,
and in all matters of literary business, had few equals.
Here, with a word of
praise to the compiler of the index to the volumes, we must reluctantly
lay down our pen. The work is of enduring interest, and one cannot but
regret that the hand which penned the two volumes now before us is not
with us still to complete the work.
Volume 1 |
Volume 2 |
Volume 3
And as Blackwood's Magazine was so popular
we've found a pdf of Volume 2
for you to read (129Mb) |